Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the MannKind Corporation 2014 Year-End Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later instructions will be given for the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, this call is being recorded today, February 24, 2015. Joining us today for MannKind are President and CEO, Hakan Edstrom; and Chief Financial Officer, Matthew Pfeffer. Also joining for the question-and-answer period is Executive Chairman, Alfred Mann. I would now like to turn the call over to Matthew Pfeffer, Chief Financial Officer of MannKind Corporation. Please go ahead, sir.

Yes, good afternoon, and thank you for participating in today's call. We're going to break with tradition in few places on the call with Hakan leading off the discussion after which I'll provide a discussion of our financial results for the fourth quarter and full-year 2014 as reported this morning. But as usual before we proceed further please note the comments made during this call will include forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. It is possible that actual results could differ from these stated expectations. For factors, which could cause actual results to differ from expectations, please refer to the reports filed by the company with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. This conference call contains time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of the date of this live broadcast February 24, 2015. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this call. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Hakan.

Thank you, Matt, and good afternoon. Let me start my comments today by reviewing our accomplishments with AFREZZA and our plan for leveraging our existing strength to develop new therapies. First, let me recap all that we accomplished in 2014, which was pivotal year in this company's history. First and foremost, we achieved the approval of AFREZZA, a novel rapid acting inhaled insulin treatment and currently the cornerstone therapy of MannKind. Soon after we entered into the global licensing agreement with Sanofi who we believe is the best possible strategic partner for AFREZZA. This partnership puts AFREZZA in the best position for commercialization. And this brings me to the fourth quarter which was a very important and busy quarter for us. We finalized all the partnership arrangements with Sanofi, established joint management committees, prepare the transfer of the IND, and plan for the post-marketing studies agreed with the FDA as part of our approval. The AFREZZA, NDA, and IND, have been transferred to Sanofi, and Sanofi with MannKind's assistance will be responsible for conducting the post-marketing studies and managing the ongoing quarterly and annual report. Commercial manufacturing got underway in the fourth quarter in preparation for launching in early February. We provided the commercial loan supply in January following an integrated production plan issued in October of 2014. As we did throughout the year, I'm happy to report that all those activities were executed with excellent results and all key milestones were reached. In fact, our manufacturing startup has been outstanding. Our deals have been better than projected and we have consistently stayed ahead of our very ambitious delivery schedule. Installation of additional capacity remains on schedule and will come in line during the second quarter, more than tripling our manufacturing capacity. Consequently, we are prepared to supply additional commercial…

Thank you, Hakan. So turning now to the financials. The net loss applicable to common stockholders for all of 2014 was $198.4 million or $0.51 per share compared with a net loss applicable to common stockholders of $191.5 million or $0.64 per share for 2013. Operating expenses increased year-over-year from $169.4 million to $179.6 million or $10.2 million, primarily due to a $19.7 million increase in G&A expenses, only partially offset by a $9.5 million decrease in R&D expenses. Increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to increased professional fees of $15.4 million associated with the closing of the collaboration and license agreement with Sanofi, which we announced earlier; the amendment of the financial facility with Deerfield; and a significant expansion in our program to identify, screen, and fully evaluate new product opportunities that will best take advantage of the unique advantages of our Technosphere drug delivery technology. The outcome of some of this work was discussed just shortly earlier by Hakan. Other G&A expenses increased by $4.3 million, primarily due to stock-based compensation, earned compensation for the achievement of significant corporate milestones in 2014, as well as severance expense related to reduction in force in the fourth quarter of 2014. R&D expenses decreased in 2014 with the completion of the Affinity studies in 2013 resulting in decreased clinical trial related cost of $14.7 million, partly offset by increased spending on commercial readiness of $4.4 million, and an overall increase in stock-based compensation expense. Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year totaled $120.8 million compared to $70.8 million at December 31, 2013. As of December 31, 2014, as previously announced, we had earned $50 million from two milestone payments in connection with the satisfaction of manufacturing milestones specified in the Sanofi agreement. This amount is…

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. The first question is from Adnan Butt with RBC Capital Markets.

Good afternoon. This is Jeff on for Adnan. Thank you for taking our question. A question on the pipeline, I know you mentioned the three areas of focus. But are there any updates or plans in the near future for the inhaled GLP-1? And also is there an upper limit capacity for Technosphere technology to deliver proteins to the lungs?

In regards to your question on GLP that certainly is a topic that's under discussion with our current partner Sanofi. So I can certainly acknowledge the fact that that is also a potential development project that we have in conjunction with them. On the second question, you're looking at the size of the API in terms of the ability to deliver with the Technosphere?

Yes, since insulin and GLP-1 are both pretty small. I was just wondering if there was like a upper limit capacity for a larger protein.

Yes, there is. However I have to say that I'm not say skillful enough in the technicalities of the product I could give you a specific molecular weight and so on and so forth. But I mean we are looking usually at like small molecules and relatively potent dry symptoms of the API to be able to deliver it through the lines. However one also need to realize that by avoiding the first type metabolism sometimes you could significantly reduced the amount of API and still we get a good metabolic effect because of the fact that you delivered through the line.

Yes, this is Mann, I was hoping that Hakan might remember, I know, I've heard that figure stated before, but I can't recall what it is the size limits, but that was certainly part of the screening criteria that was being used by us and our outside advisors to help us select products both as far as the molecular size and weight of the API but also the quantity needed, if you get into new quantities, you just start running into practical problems for how big cartridges get or whether you can fit them in there without significant redesign. Thus all taking into consideration as we selected the API and the choice as we -- to these indications we did.

The next question is from Cory Kasimov with JPMorgan.

Hey, good afternoon guys, and thank you for taking my questions. First one is I am wondering if you can comment on how reimbursement negotiations have been going for Sanofi on the AFREZZA front. And how easy it is for patients to get AFREZZA relative to the analog at this stage? And then I have a follow-up.

It's a little premature to say. I mean typically most of those discussions don't happen until it's been out in the market for some number of months. I know those discussions are ongoing; it's a very active area. We had a joint advisory committee meeting, joint AFREZZA advisory committee just yesterday, in fact. And kind of an update on that they are working diligently at it. So it's coming along. In the meantime, you can still get it. Some places, it depends on the particular insurer. Some of them will just stick it in Tier 3 automatically as a new product. Some will want prior authorization, which isn't usually very complicated to get. It just requires the doctor to request it. Most times it's just a form they check off and say, I think this patient should get it. So yes, an extra step, it makes a little bit more complicated initially and slows down the process in the first few months, but so far we haven't heard there has been a particular barrier.

Okay, and then Matt, in your comments you alluded to inventory having a potential affect this year. Can you comment at all on kind of what the early inventory build in the pipeline has been for AFREZZA?

Not with much specificity. I just -- I see it in our budget and projections for the year. So I wanted to get it on the table. We're hoping not to be holding too much as we transfer to Sanofi and let them hold it instead as we produce it. Right now we have not had a material amount of inventory build. We don't have a lot of -- the way it generally works, we take it, if you remember the packaging, we'll take it to the foil over wrap stage in our inventory, and then hold it in that form, and then it once it gets combined in the different kinds of packaging, as determined, like it will be may be a mixture of 4 and 8-unit cartridges for example, and later 4, 8, 12, or whatever happens to be it goes into a secondary package or and that's where it's really technically finished goods. In our hands it is more like semi-finished goods. And we don't do too terribly much of that. But we do have some obligations to hold some measured in number of months and to the Sanofi contract.

Okay. I appreciate you taking the questions. I will hop back in the queue.

Thank you.

The next question is from Jay Olson with Goldman Sachs.

Hi, thanks for taking the questions and congrats to Hakan on his new role as CEO. I had a couple of AFREZZA questions and then may be a pipeline question, if I could. Could you tell us what the sample configuration is? Is it 90 cartridges? And also how many sample packages have already been distributed?

Well the sample packaging, is, if you're talking about the real samples that have active drug I believe it's a 10-day supply, so that would entail 30 cartridges. There's also a demo gets flirting around out there would be dummy inhalers and cartridges just for demonstration purposes or show what the patients or perspective patients what they look like. The second part, I forgot the second part of the question.

How many of the 10-day supplies samples have been distributed?

Not enough. Or as I mentioned in my -- I mean, we've been asked by Sanofi to look into increasing the number of sample packages. So I couldn't give you a number, I only know at this point in time that demand has been higher than they had initially anticipated.

Okay. And then on the new product development front, I guess you mentioned pulmonary disease, pain, oncology support. I am guessing it sounds like an anti-emetic. It seems like may be these are more moving in the direction of PRN dosing as opposed to chronic dosing. Is that correct, and if so, can you give us some color around how you chose to move the new product development in that direction?

You're correct in regards to the fact that most of these are certain, not say, chronic type of diseases ad hoc. The benefit there of course is that we have a significant safety package around AFREZZA, because it's addressing such a kind of common disease and the long-term disease where patients are on it. So that certainly makes sense. And then there are other areas where our technology is certainly very beneficial in terms of again avoiding the first type pass metabolism. So in working with a number of consulting groups, physicians, and hospitals, and hospital groups out there, in identifying areas where the cancer patient are suffering from a lot of side effects from the therapy and where most of the say reprieve that they get are say in-hospital type of the treatment which is very costly and very inconvenient. So those are the types of areas which is being focused on specifically and have opened up actually quite new avenues for us that we really did not even consider only about six months back.

Yes. Some of the, that just comes from the criteria that Hakan was talking about earlier where we're looking for much quicker regulatory path and getting a jump start into the market much more quickly than we've experienced before. So may be AFREZZA would be a extreme example of that but there's a lot of ways we could dramatically shorten that pathway, make it go much more quickly, and frankly it costs less. So those are amongst the criteria that were used in some of the screening and some of the same criteria lead to some of the effects you're talking about.

The next question is from Keith Markey with Griffin Securities.

Hi. Thank you for taking my questions. I just had a few related to accounting. I was wondering if you could break out the current liabilities and also discuss a little bit about the prepaid expenses going up -- most of them are significantly higher than last year.

Yes, well -- it's a little similar to the accounting nuances. In the prepaid expenses we had a pretty large advanced payment for inventory, which is what caused that go up, it was $15 million for inventory and shipments that we've received or are receiving this year, and that's the key thing there, other than cash of course -- excuse me other than, yes, it's pretty much the big things and of course the receivable from Sanofi is $50 million so that cash and both well, you asked specifically prepaid. That's really mostly insulin. As far as current liabilities, a lot of that have to do with where things are being classified now, for example, things have moved up the notes that are due in August of 2015 are now current, so they're shown in current liabilities as supposed to long-term. And then the other -- the biggest change their -- I'm sorry that you'll see all this when the K gets filed, would be. Remember going back to the strange accounting for this whole collaboration causes us to take the whole $200 million essentially that were going from Sanofi and hang it up as a liability. So sitting in current liabilities, which is an odd place to find it, but its deferred payments from Sanofi essentially, so it's not going to the P&L yet.

Okay, and well that that sort of leads to my next question. That is, how are you going to actually present the results of your partnership with Sanofi in your upcoming quarterly income statements?

Well, if you remember the last call, I talked very awkward but you won't find it in our quarterly income statement nor our cash flow statement, you have to tease it out of the balance sheet and the other disclosures we will make. It's kind of awkward but that's the way the accounting world seems to be these days. So really anything that would be a source of revenue is going to be hung up on the balance sheet for a while. We will make disclosures about what -- to make sure there is no misunderstanding we will make disclosures about what the profits or losses from a collaboration are. And you can see there is a movement on the balance sheet but that’s not a very good disclosure. So we'll make sure it's specified in the MD&A at the very least, and probably in the press release as well. Well I also talked about things that I think investors will find important like levels of sales. Sanofi will probably previously disclose that anyway so they typically have their calls before ours, but we'll make sure it gets in there, even though it doesn't direct on -- it doesn't reflect it on the face of the financial statements.

Okay. Great, thanks. And I was just wondering if the 12-unit dosage form that was filed in December is the same formulation as the 4-unit and 8-unit dosages.

Yes, it is.

It is.

Exactly the same, yes.

Okay.

That's just simple as it's just been a little more powder in the cartridge.

Okay, and finally, you talked a little bit about the new drugs coming out fairly quickly. Do you think that something could be launched later this year or is it -- is that way too early?

That is way too early. Yes, I mean you need to go through proof of concept and go on those efforts. We certainly hope to have started all or at least the most of the development projects during the course of this year, but yes, no you will not see a launch in 2015 that's not possible with the regulatory pathway even though we are looking at an expedited regulatory pathway for most of these product opportunities because they are -- kind of known API. So from that point of view they tend to have a good safety profile around them already and they are -- they're well known substances.

Your next question is from Arlinda Lee with MLV & Co.

Hi, it's Ben Shim for Arlinda Lee. Thank you for taking my questions. For AFREZZA I was just wondering if you were going to contemplate any other packaging sizes for example, pediatric, is there anything like that that you have in store for the future?

We are aware of the fact that as part of say a pediatric, say range of product, we may have to go to a lower say dosage size, than we have currently. And those are part of the development discussions that are people are having with Sanofi at this point in time. I don't have a decision at this point in time, but it certainly been recognized that for younger children that that may be a necessity.

Okay, thank you, Hakan. Just a housekeeping question for Matt. Matt, can you tell us a little bit about what happened to the convertible notes? Not the corporate converts but I think the Deerfield notes? It looks like they went down. You just mentioned an amendment to the loan agreement. Can you tell us what happened there?

They haven't gone down recently. I mean the last, there was some conversions early in 2014 which caused them to go down, but there has been nothing since then. There was -- it was one of the reasons for the fluctuations in the P&L which is just a non-cash charge because we had some amortized discount that we had to flow through when those portion of the notes went away, so I don't really think of it as a loss, but from a P&L standpoint it is. But since that time there is nothing that's changing and then the discount continues to be accretive a little bit. And then -- there's no conversion rights left with the Deerfield notes, it's just straight debt now.

Right, okay great. And just on the year-end share count, the 406.1 basic shares, that's before the $9 million stock loan arrangement, right? Or is that inclusive?

That is not, does not include the $9 million because those will come back to us, they're not considered to be circulating for that purpose.

That was the last question for today. I'd like to turn the call back to Hakan Edstrom for closing remarks.

All right. Well thank you for joining us today and next we are certainly looking forward to sharing with you the first quarter 2015 information which will happen in early May. So again thank you.