Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the MSCI Inc. second quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question and answer session where participants are to ask one question at a time, then add themselves back to the queue for any additional questions. We will have further instructions for you later on. I would now like to turn the call over to Jeremy Ulan, Head of Investor Relations and Treasurer. Sir, you may begin.

Good day, and welcome to the MSCI Inc. Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Earlier this morning, we issued a press release announcing our results for the second quarter of 2025. This press release, along with an earnings presentation and brief quarterly update, are available on our website, msci.com, under the Investor Relations tab. Let me remind you that this call contains forward-looking statements which are governed by the language on the second slide of today's presentation. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements which speak only as of the date on which they are made, are based on current expectations and current economic conditions, and are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements. For a discussion of additional risks and uncertainties, please see the Risk Factors and forward-looking statements disclaimer in our most recent Form 10-K and in our other SEC filings. During today's call, in addition to results presented on the basis of U.S. GAAP, we also refer to non-GAAP measures. You'll find a reconciliation of our non-GAAP measures to the equivalent GAAP in the appendix of the earnings presentation. We will also discuss operating metrics such as run rate and retention rate. Important information regarding our use of operating metrics, such as run rate and retention rate, are available in the earnings presentation. On the call today are Henry Fernandez, our Chairman and CEO, Baer Pettit, our President and COO, and Andy Wiechmann, our Chief Financial Officer. With that, let me now turn the call over to Henry Fernandez. Henry?

Thank you, Jeremy. Good day, everyone. And thank you all for joining us. In the second quarter, MSCI Inc. delivered another strong financial performance, including revenue growth of over 9%, adjusted EBITDA growth of over 10%, adjusted earnings per share growth of almost 15%, and free cash flow of over $300 million. Year to date, we have repurchased $286 million worth of MSCI Inc. shares at an average price of $557 per share, demonstrating our long-term conviction in the value of our franchise. Our second quarter operating metrics included total run rate growth of 11% fueled by record AUM levels in ETF products linked to MSCI Inc. indices, and asset-based fee run rate growth of 17%. Among client segments, we recorded double-digit subscription run rate growth with banks and broker-dealers, wealth managers, hedge funds, and asset owners. Despite the well-known ongoing pressures on active asset managers, MSCI Inc.'s subscription run rate growth with its client segment held steady at 6%, while rotation with active asset managers stayed high at 96%. Across all client segments, MSCI Inc. is rapidly developing innovative use cases for our existing solutions while developing new solutions for our increasingly diverse client base. Turning to our product lines, MSCI Inc.'s Q2 performance affirmed that index in general and our asset-based fee franchise in particular, is a key growth engine for us with enormous opportunities. Most notably, our strong ABF run rate growth reflects the vital importance of MSCI Inc. indices to global investing, especially in non-US market exposures. In fact, MSCI Inc. captured more indexed equity ETF cash flows than any other index provider during the quarter. Total equity index ETF AUM linked to MSCI Inc. indices surpassed $2 trillion for the first time, driving total index ETF and non-ETF AUM balances tracking MSCI Inc. indices to…

Thank you, Henry, and greetings, everyone. During the quarter with rapidly moving markets, MSCI Inc. benefited from both traditional and newer product offerings, deepening our role in the global investment ecosystem while further diversifying our client base. Among banks and broker-dealers, we delivered subscription run rate growth of 10% with strong traction in index and analytics. We are supporting these clients with MSCI Inc.'s equity derivatives and trading solutions amid market volatility, which is helping to fuel new wins in index. In Q2, for example, MSCI Inc. completed a large deal with a bank in the US for ETF-linked custom index datasets. This deal captures not only our work on customization but also rising capital markets activity tied to the ETF ecosystem, which is creating demand for advanced data on our index content. Meanwhile, another US bank signed a global deal to use our equity analytics solutions for sell-side market making and quantitative investment strategies to support their clients' increasing interest in deploying capital to international markets. Deals like that helped MSCI Inc. drive equity analytics growth of nearly 13% with our total run rate reaching almost $244 million across client segments. Supporting the asset liability program within banks is another opportunity for MSCI Inc. Most notably, we completed a large deal with the Treasury Division of a US Bank for our fixed income portfolio management solutions. Turning to hedge funds, we achieved subscription run rate growth of 12% driven largely by analytics, which posted a record quarter in recurring sales with that segment. Long-short equity managers and multistrategy hedge funds alike demand best-of-breed equity models, data, and risk insights to support their various alpha generation strategies across all market conditions. MSCI Inc. is focused on growing our footprint with this fast money investors community. For example, in Q2, we…

Thanks, Baer. Hello, everyone. Our second quarter results demonstrate the strong momentum of our business model. The compounding impact of our investments is particularly evident in index, where asset-based fee run rate growth was 17%, benefiting from broad investor appetite for global market exposures. We experienced another quarter of strong flows into ETFs linked to our indexes. Equity ETFs linked to MSCI Inc. indexes experienced $49 billion of inflows during the second quarter, capturing 29% of all inflows into indexed equity ETFs and representing the largest level of quarterly inflows since 2021. Fueling this strength were ETF products linked to MSCI Inc. developed markets ex U.S. indexes, which captured $32 billion, more than 50% of all flows in the DMXUS index ETFs in the quarter. We also saw solid inflows in the equity ETFs linked to our factor indexes, capturing $9 billion of inflows with strong traction in quality and value and growth products. Index subscription run rate growth was 9%, reflecting a continuation of the dynamics we have seen in recent periods. We saw 16%, 14%, and 129% index subscription run rate growth from wealth managers, hedge funds, banks, and asset owners, respectively. Asset managers delivered index subscription run rate growth slightly below 7%, supported by steady performance in our DM and EM core index modules. Custom index subscription run rate growth remained in the teens, with traction across asset managers, banks, and hedge funds. Our custom indexes are enabling our clients to create custom benchmarks, develop structured products, research markets, and backtest strategies. We're also directly seeing the commercial benefits for ongoing investments in new product innovation. Year to date, we've generated over $4 million of total sales from new product areas released in the last six months, such as our ETF link custom index module, constituent AUM…

Certainly. And as a reminder, ladies and gentlemen, if you have more than one question, get back in the queue as time allows. Our first question comes from the line of Alex Kramm from UBS. Your question, please.

Yeah. Hey. Good morning, everyone. I think I'm gonna ask the same question that I asked last quarter, which was really about the potential help you should get as assets flow more into international markets from the US. Obviously, you're starting to see it on the ABF side. We can all track that. But I think we're seeing it on the active side already too. In terms of flows picking up there. So just wondering what's your conversations with clients over there have been and then what you and how you expect that to hopefully manifest itself in an acceleration of the subscription side and index as well? Thank you.

Yeah. Alex, thanks for the question. So clearly, the rotation of assets from the US market to the international to the non-US market is a huge boost to our asset-based fee business. And just as a reminder, there are $6 trillion of our clients' assets that are indexed to our indices to MSCI Inc. indices, $2 trillion in ETF and $4 trillion in non-ETF AUM. And we've seen the flows going into there. In states. And that's the comment that Andy made about almost $50 billion inflows, almost 30% market share during the quarter. On the subscription side, for sure, the rotation is going to help significantly. It is still a little bit too early to tell how the subscription run rate picks up or the sales pick up on it. But we don't believe that this is just gonna be a huge sort of short-term catalyst in our subscription. Because when you look at our client base, we already have a large client base in APAC which is invested globally. We have a large client base in EMEA, which is invested globally. And a large client base in the US, which is invested globally. So what we're hoping for is that the rotation to international markets brings other asset managers to launch funds and enhance their products and that's where we'll see the incremental demand. But it's gonna be incremental on top of an already high installed base of our data and our analytics, our data or indices analytics with global investors. But, as I said, it's certainly gonna help a great deal. It's just gonna take time, and it's not gonna be like a galloping type of boost.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Manav Patnaik from Barclays. Your question, please.

Thank you. Henry, you talked a lot about your asset manager base kind of staying stable in that mid-single-digit growth range. It sounds like, for you guys to get back to faster growth, you need to get that growth accelerated again. And I was just wondering, based on your conversations, clearly, budgets, spend, etcetera, is tight there. Like, is it innovation, or how do you think you can get that piece of the puzzle growing faster again?

Manav, that truly is the crux of the question on the subscription business. Right? When you look at it from a client segment perspective, not just a product perspective. And as a reminder, we have $2.35 billion in run rate in subscription run rate of which about 50% is active asset managers. And the other 50% is broken down into banks and hedge funds and asset owners, wealth managers, and others. So just going through the facts a bit, and then I'll answer your question is, that 50% of active asset managers basically stock pickers, is growing at a little over 6%. And the other 50% is growing at 11.5%. So therefore, in order for us to accelerate the total subscription run rate two things will need to happen. One is which we're working really hard on is the 50% that is non-active asset managers need to grow at a faster pace than we've had in the past. As I said, right now, it's 11.5%. And we're creating a lot of new products, relocating sort of people and salespeople and consultants into these client segments in order to grow faster. The most promising part of that is what we call the fast money segment. So, banks and hedge funds and market makers and people like that because they feed off the indexed AUM ecosystem. And there's a huge amount of liquidity, a huge amount of flows that they can make money off. So we're very focused on that. For sure, as I said we said in the past, we continue to be very focused on asset owners. And, of course, the wealth segment, which is in all in the last quarter, the wealth segment grew over 17% and the asset owners grew over 12%. So that's the first thing that…

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Toni Kaplan from Morgan Stanley. Your question please.

Thanks so much. Maybe this sort of dovetails on the last part of the last question. But just hoping to get an update on consolidation that you're seeing and how much that you're aware of will impact your results in sort of the upcoming quarters if there's any way to sort of quantify that and talk about if you're seeing that trend maybe start to dissipate or if that's an ongoing thing that we should expect over the next number of quarters? Thanks.

So, Toni, I think the consolidation is there are periods in which we see two, three deals happening, large deals, in a particular year and periods in which we don't see a lot happening. So on a trended basis, it will continue but we are not yet worried that that is going to accelerate and that will hurt us a lot. And, therefore, we're not putting that into our forecast. We're not putting that into our pipelines and things like that. Obviously, we could be surprised by two big asset managers acquiring one another or merging with one another. And the like, we are already assuming that they will continue to be a secular trend to some level of consolidation. What we're excited about is that the industry needs to transform. And a big part of that transformation is the movement that I was mentioning before from non-listed mutual funds to and every kind of exchange-traded fund whether it's a market cap, which is what we've been doing, passive market cap, or a passive non-market cap with some themes around it, whether it's fixed income and now for sure on active asset management. So we are beginning to see early signs of a major transformation in the industry. By those participants reconfiguring their product line into active ETFs.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Ashish Sabadra from RBC Capital Markets. Your question, please.

Thanks for taking my question. I just wanted to focus on the retention, which was a bit soft, overall level, particularly on analytics and sustainability. I was wondering any color on that front. And as we think about the rest of the year, any puts and takes on retention going forward? Thanks.

Sure. Sure. This is Andy here. So as you know, cancels can be a little bit lumpy quarter to quarter. If we look at Q2 and dive into what drove the lower retention in this Q2 versus Q2 a year ago. As you alluded to, we had lower retention in analytics. That's an area that tends to be lumpy. And actually, the year-ago period had quite high retention for the segment. And then, we had slightly lower retention in sustainability and climate. Which you alluded to. And I'd say the main drivers of cancels continue to be client events. And some financial budget pressures that Henry alluded to. If we take a step back and look at where retention rates have been over the last year or so compared to where it was back in 2022, which is when we saw kind of all-time high retention rates. It's mostly lower in real assets and sustainability and climate. If we look from a client segment lens, it's really from hedge funds. So, we've seen some elevated cancels from hedge funds, which as you know represent a larger portion of our run rate now. We've also seen some higher cancels from corporate advisors. Within the sustainability and climate segment. And so, I'd say the place where we've seen the slightly elevated cancels being real assets sustainability and climate and then with hedge funds, which is naturally to run at a slightly lower retention rate, we would expect those dynamics to continue in the near term. I would highlight that to the prior question, retention rate with asset managers continues to be quite solid at around 96%. But in some of these other areas, we're seeing slightly lower retention rates relative to where we were a couple of years ago.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Owen Lau from Oppenheimer. Your question please.

Good morning, and thank you for taking my question. I do want to go back to the sales environment in the second quarter and also far in the third quarter. I think it was $44 million in the second quarter and down a little bit year over year. But I do think you had a one-off item in the second quarter of 2024. So if you can unpack a little bit more on the sales environment and the outlook, that will be great. Thanks.

Sure. Yeah. As you alluded to, in the second quarter of last year, we had a meaningful contribution from the Moody's ESG partnership that we signed. We didn't quantify that, but we did say that it was a meaningful contributor to the sales a year ago. And so, obviously, we didn't have that in the second quarter. Just taking a step back, and looking at the overall environment, the markets are in a good spot now, but it was a volatile quarter. The first half of the second quarter, we saw heightened uncertainty, volatility, general cautiousness from clients, as you all know. We're now in a position where the markets are hitting new highs, and we're clearly benefiting on the ABF side. I'd say fortunate that most of our clients don't change their buying decisions in the short term based on market swings up and market swings down. So overall, I characterize the environment as remaining fairly consistent with what we've been seeing in recent quarters. As Henry alluded to, if we see sustained favorable market dynamics, and momentum on the international front continuing, that can be constructive for us. We continue to be overall encouraged by the client engagement that we were seeing. As you heard us talk about the healthy pipeline of products that we have. But I'd say at this stage overall, we're seeing consistent dynamics with what we've seen in recent quarters.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Alexander Hess from JPMorgan. Your question please.

Hey, everybody. Maybe you could just help us puzzle in the various moving pieces here and understand a bit more, especially with Henry's comments to lead off the call. If asset managers are going to remain tricky, does that mean that sort of that 10% revenue low double digits, excuse me, ABF revenue growth target is sort of now a bit of a stretchier target. And then I have a follow-up question on that as well.

Look. I think the way that we look at the totality of the company and we actually encourage you to look at that. Is that a very meaningful part of our company, over 20%, 22, 23%, in asset-based fees. Is on a tier. And not only cyclically, but secularly. I think the trend to do systematic investing in the form of either non-listed products or listed products like ETF is just stunning. We started with market cap. We're now going to non-market cap, going to fixed income. We're going to active ETFs. Active fixed income. And all of that. So frankly, I think people are not focused on that. In the success of the company. And that will continue to grow on a secular basis, on a trended basis, significantly. Over the years and decades to come. The other part of the business is subscription. Which is, as I mentioned, half of it is active management. Half of it is dependent on the active management industry, and the other half is dependent on other client segments. The other client segments like wealth management, GPs, for private assets, the fast money segment as we told the market makers, those people are on a tier. They have enormous capital, and then the fast money segment hedge funds and market makers and all of that. And they leave a lot of our products. The wealth management industry is expanding because of the wealth accumulation in the world. And the professional management of assets. And now even the defined contribution management of assets in a lot of private equities, in a lot of segments. So we have enormous potential in all of that. So MSCI Inc. started life in which we have two, three different product lines. Look. Act act benchmarks and equity analytics…

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Faiza Alwy from Deutsche Bank. Your question please.

I wanted to ask about the demand environment for custom indexes. Because there was a slight slowdown in custom indexes subscription sales. And I would have thought that given the Foxbury acquisition and some of the technology advancements that you've talked about, that we could see potentially accelerating growth. So just wanted to hear more about what's going on there.

Yeah. Thanks for that. Look. Fundamentally, there's no change. Right? I think that the direction that we're headed with this, we're very confident about it. I think the nature of these types of quarterly numbers there can sometimes be a slight change or hiccup depending on what's happening with specific deals. But our outlook remains exactly the same. We're very positive on this. We're building out capabilities. And so long story short, the story is unchanged. And this remains a very important growth opportunity for us. Unequivocally.

And our next question comes from the line of Kelsey Zhu from Autonomous. Your question, please.

Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. Henry, I'm glad you mentioned active ETFs a few times in prepared remarks and in the Q&A. What we really see is there's been a wave of active ETF launches globally since the start of 2024, and a lot of them are based in the US. I understand it's a very big market for MSCI Inc., but maybe not the strongest market. So just curious to hear more about how MSCI Inc. is positioned with active ETFs and if you could talk a little bit more about the economics of the products and services you provide there, that would be really helpful as well.

So this is a significant growth opportunity for us. The dialogue with pretty much every active asset manager is high. The active ETF product line with our clients is a range from almost like enhanced indexation to targeting a particular universe with stock picking to a little bit more unconstrained and stock picking. Which is what typically happens in mutual funds nowadays. So, therefore, we can play a large role across all of that. In an unconstrained service stock picking environment, we can sell more of our data and our benchmarks and all of that. At the other end, on an almost, like, enhanced indexation or with overlays, our business model is not dramatically different from the passive model in which we license our universe, we license our indices, and we get AUM fees on that. And similarly, in between. When they do that. So when you look at what's typically happening in active ETF is people are looking for a theme. They're looking for an investment thesis, and we are doing the work for them in quantitatively coming up with investment thesis, and putting it into an index so that they can pick from and go out and build their active ETFs. So we have a lot of dialogue in the US. As I said, we have 50 clients all over the world. There is a lot of dialogue in Europe about this. Many of the captive, the bank-owned asset managers and wealth managers want to play a large role in here. Some of them with their own proprietary products, some of them with third-party products, and the like. So I think that gradually, the active asset management industry, the mutual fund industry, is gonna revive itself under this type of category, and it's gonna create growth. And that growth is gonna be very beneficial to MSCI Inc.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Craig Huber from Huber Research Partners. Your question please.

Great. Thank you. Andy, I wanted to ask you, what's sort of the puts and takes here? How we should think about getting to the high end of your outlook for cost for the year? Versus getting to the low end of the guidance range there? And then with that, if you could answer the question, please. About I think three months ago, you guys said you were assuming stock markets would gradually increase over the course of the year. Obviously, these last three months, they were quite strong. What are you guys assuming right now as for your base case you think about your internal investment spending and cost overall? Thank you.

Sure. Sure. Yes. Thanks, Craig. As you know, we're continually calibrating the pace of spend. We do look at a wide range of factors. And it has been a volatile market backdrop over the last quarter or so. As we stated, our expense guidance ranges remain the same. So we're still committed to delivering within that range. And there are still a lot of moving pieces at this point in the year, but maybe to provide a bit more color on where we are and what we're seeing. As you alluded to, we mentioned last quarter that if AUM levels remain around their then-current levels, we would have been towards the lower end of our expense guidance ranges. Again, that was just giving you a reference point as to based on that factor, not necessarily our forecast for the year, but if AUM levels remained at that level, we would have been towards the lower end of our expense guidance ranges. I would say that if AUM levels remain around the current levels, which as you know are quite a bit higher than they were a quarter ago, for the remainder of the year, we would expect to come in towards probably the middle of our expense guidance ranges. Again, I would caveat that by saying there are a whole host of other things that feed into expense growth beyond just the AUM levels from business performance to FX movements, comp adjustments, severance, and other expense variations. But, all else equal, if AUM levels remain around their current level, we'd probably be towards the middle of our range.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Scott Wurtzel from Wolfe Research. Your question please.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. I wanted to touch on some of the emerging growth opportunities, in particular fixed income and wealth management and seeing the run rate growth accelerate, up to the high teens this quarter versus last? And just wondering how you guys kind of view the sustainability of those growth rates as we look out over the near to medium term here.

Sure. So look, we're clearly pleased with the results in both of those categories. And fixed income had nice growth in analytics and the wealth numbers that I mentioned in my prepared remarks. So while I don't want to reference a particular percentage, I think we've been pretty consistent in saying that these are important investment areas for us. We continue to add to our capabilities. We're very focused also on not merely just product capabilities, but the go-to-market capabilities in terms of marketing, training all our client coverage people, etcetera. So we believe that, allowing for the broad way that we've characterized the environment in both the challenges some of those challenges by segment, that's more of a comment on fixed income. But in terms of wealth, we're confident that we're making the right steps. So I think generally, the answer to your question is we are both planning to see these growth rates continue and assume that they will do so.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of David Motemaden from Evercore ISI. Your question please.

Hey, thanks. Good morning. Totally hear you on the asset managers and the steady growth there. One of the other areas of opportunity, just that you had mentioned was on hedge funds. And I was surprised to hear the subscription run rate growth continue to decelerate. I think it was 12% this quarter. It's, like, 14 or 15 the past few quarters. Can you just unpack about what's driving that deceleration?

Sure. Sure. Yeah. So listen, the hedge fund segment is by its nature lumpy. I alluded to this earlier, but it tends to run at a lower retention rate. And so we can see that growth rate skewed by a cancel here or there. And actually, in the current quarter, we did have a client event-driven cancel on the index side. That fed into the index hedge fund growth rate. More generally, we can have large sales to hedge funds on both the index and the analytics side. It can also be driven by the pace of new content and modules that we release. So, in the past, we've had periods when we release things like our free float dataset, which was in strong demand from hedge funds, drove the acceleration there. We have a number of product offerings that alluded to in the prepared remarks that we are releasing now that similarly should be helpful to that fast money community including hedge funds. And so, it will vary period to period. As Henry alluded to, we continue to have conviction this is an attractive long-term growth opportunity for us. We've seen strong momentum across our equity models, much of our index content, and as the index ecosystem continues to grow, this trading community between hedge funds market makers, broker-dealers. We continue to see a number of opportunities, and it's an area where we have a lot of innovation taking place. But it will be lumpy period to period, so I wouldn't read too much into a slowdown in one quarter there.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of George Tong from Goldman Sachs. Your question please.

Hi, thanks. Good morning. Henry, you talked about a goal of accelerating your non-active subscription growth beyond 11.5% by creating new products and relocating sales and consultants into this segment. Can you comment on how long it would take to see meaningful acceleration here based on these initiatives? And how much faster non-active subscriptions can grow?

Yes. Sure, George. It's hard to predict, in the next few quarters. Right? On it. But when you look at the set of opportunities that we have, they're very significant. Very significant. So we talked about what we call the fast money segment, market makers, hedge funds, and all of that. And that will accelerate at some point. And continue to grow because when you have $6 trillion, and about $1.718 trillion of all benchmark, either active or passive, that generates an incredible flow of capital that needs to be understood in terms of how it flows, needs to be people have to buy into the index, balancing portfolios and all of that. So we talked a little bit about that. The other one is wealth management. The wealth management industry is institutionalizing, so to speak. The wealth management advisers are looking for institutional quality portfolio construction tools, portfolio management software, models, and all of that. And that's why this, MSCI Inc. Wealth Manager, which is a software platform that puts in all of our data analytics and all of that. We're very excited about that. We had a large sale this quarter. And it has significant growth in there. The same thing that these people also buy enormous amounts of ETFs as we know well. As a basis for their portfolios. And many of them are going into direct indexing and need those custom index capabilities that we built. That's the wealth management segment. The GP remember that when you look at our private capital solutions business, excluding real assets, just the private capital solutions part the vast majority of that run rate comes from institutional limited partners. So there are two major initiatives that we have underway there. One is to make the wealth managers also a limited…

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Jason Haas from Wells Fargo. Your question, please.

Hi. This is Jimmy on for Jason Haas. So you touched on this briefly, but can you maybe give some more color on how adoption is trending for private capital solutions in the US and also internationally where I think you're more underpenetrated and what you're doing to grow that adoption. Thank you.

So let me take a crack at that. So we closed on the Burgess acquisition, two and a half or so years ago. The first year plus a year and a quarter, year and a half, we were intensely focused inward in making sure that we integrated the datasets, the technology, the people, and all of that in a way that was not gonna be disruptive to our client. And, we focused an enormous amount of effort there. Another big focus of ours was how do we ramp up AI in terms of data capture but there is a massive amount of data that we collect from private assets. So documents and emails and reports and tables and all of that. So we've been very busy in doing all of that. So about a year ago or so, we started the process of building a business plan and how do we expand the business. So that took about six, nine months. We went through all of those business plans at the beginning of this year. Let's say, the first quarter. And now we're in the process of implementing that. None of that is at this point, shown on the numbers. That we can see. So everywhere we go, every asset manager on the planet wants to allocate more assets to private assets. They always tell us the same thing. The reason we have a lot of assets in the public market is because of two reasons. Transparency and liquidity. And in order for us to go bigger in private assets, we need transparency and liquidity. So our answer to them is, we're gonna give you all the transparency in the world. We cannot give you the liquidity because we are not a market maker, but we will give you an assessment of values. So we're working on creating evaluated prices across some of these asset classes starting with private credit. In order to give them a sense of value so that there's more transactions among LPs and all of that. So all of that is ongoing. So, you see that we've had consistent growth on this private capital solution over the last couple of years, but the acceleration of the growth is gonna come as we begin to roll out all these business plans, all these new product developments, and all of that, and that's gonna take a little bit of time. But so we're at the cusp of beginning that.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Wahid Ahmed from Bank of America. Your question, please.

Hi. Good morning. Could you talk about how you're thinking about the pricing environment as you begin having conversations with your clients? Especially more so now since the macro is still uncertain. Just sort of what the conversations are like, and are there any areas where people are more not as receptive compared to prior years?

Yeah. I'd say no major changes. In our approach consistent with what I alluded to earlier that we're seeing a fairly consistent environment and our approach to pricing remains the same. I would say the contribution of price increases to new recurring sales is roughly in line with what we've seen over the last four quarters. So consistent with what I've mentioned recently. It does vary a bit across product lines and client segments. So maybe compared to the second quarter of last year, we saw a slight increase in the contribution from price within analytics. I think that's intentional and reflects how we were monetizing many of the enhancements and added capabilities that we've been bringing to market. We do see a slightly higher contribution from price and sustainability, really driven by the overall drop in sales there. But across MSCI Inc., it's been pretty consistent and our approach has not changed. We are continually seeking to align the pricing of our solutions with the value that we are delivering to clients and the ongoing enhancements. And we do factor in as well the overall inflationary environment, pricing environment, our cost, and client health. And so, we'll continue to calibrate the appropriate price, but we are, at the same time, always trying to be a strong long-term partner to our clients while maximizing the value we can unlock from the solutions we deliver to our clients.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Russell Quelch from Rothschild and Company. Your question please.

Yes. Thank you for having me on. You mentioned earlier you're not relying on partnerships with the GP for private fund data. But if I'm not mistaken, you are restricted from selling aggregated LP data without GP permission. So can you update in your thinking here any progress with GPs around opening up on the data side? What products you might be able to offer to GPs that would drive greater engagement and growth from this potential customer base?

Yeah. Just to clarify, when we work for the LP, the LP instructs the GP to give us every piece of information and data that is given to the LP. So that puts us at an incredibly advantageous position of capturing massive amounts of data in the underlying portfolios and the funds and all of that. Now the flip side of that is that data is proprietary to the GP and obviously, the LP that invests in those funds is entitled to that data. But if you have an LP that is not invested in those funds, currently, they're not entitled to see that data. Our contracts call for fairly generous anonymized rules, aggregated rules to put all that data together and show it to people that are not invested in those funds. Which we do, and it's pretty valuable to a lot of those people. That is a system that has worked well for the institutional market because a lot of the relationships are one-to-one. That system is not gonna work well for the wealth management space because there are tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of wealth managers that will wanna see the data ahead of time even if their clients are not invested in those funds. So we're having discussions with the GPs about liberalizing those data rights so that can be shown to that client base or detail of the LPs, the smaller LPs. And given the enormous interest in capital raising by the GPs that are in the wealth management space and in the long tail institutional LPs, sooner or later, they will liberalize those data rights so that we can show the more specific parts of those data to a wider audience. So that's work in progress. But we're pretty hopeful that will be a great avenue of success for us.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Gregory Simpson from BNP Paribas. Your question, please.

Hi. Just on the asset-based fee side, the ETF licensing yield has been quite stable for a few quarters now. Has there want to check-in on what you're seeing around pricing trends of ETF issuers. Do you think we're more stable from here on? And are also asset-based fees quite stable on the or yields quite stable on the non-ETF passive side too? Thank you.

Yeah. So to your point, we've seen stable fees here the last several quarters on the ETF side. The fees have similarly been stable on the non-ETF side. Just put a finer point on the 2.43 bps we saw in the second quarter, there was a small impact from contractual fee changes as AUMs moved into higher tiers as certain products grew. We also saw offsetting that some positive mix shift from growth in international markets. And so, there are many international products that carry a higher fee load and our fees are higher on those. And so, the international rotation has been helpful. Listen, I suggest that there are major changes to the longer-term trends we've talked about in the past. We do think fees will gradually come down over time in the ETF area. But as Henry alluded to earlier, we believe there are massive secular opportunities for us to capture assets to more than offset that. And continue to have conviction that ABF is a growth area for us, a very strong growth area for us. On the non-ETF side, we've seen stability in fees for some time. That's an area where we are seeing strong traction. Of non-market cap weighted products, custom index mandates, passive mandates, and those can carry a higher fee load. So, the growth we've seen in the non-market cap weighted products in the non-ETF space has offset pressure on the market cap weighted side. And I think that's a dynamic that we've seen for some time here.

Thank you. And our next question is a follow-up from the line of Alexander Hess from JPMorgan. Your question please.

Hey, all. Thanks for letting me back in the call. I just want to touch on Henry and team. You guys discussed the massive sort of secular opportunity in ABF. Your largest client is out there saying that their MSCI Inc. World backed product, and I'm gonna quote, is the darling of ETF savings plans in Europe. Do you guys foresee sort of the ability for the MSCI Inc. World maybe over the course of the next, I don't know, decade to look a bit like your competitor has here in the US, where you sort of have that deep ecosystem? Is that something you guys are actively trying to build towards? I'm just trying to think if we're gonna be leaning a bit more on ABF going forward. What that vision might look like in particular.

Yeah. Certainly. For sure. When you look at our global all-country or most countries benchmarks MSCI Inc. World, which obviously the developed world, but also MSCI Inc. ACWI, which is the developed and emerging world. This sort of broad global benchmarks are increasingly becoming the core foundational portfolio. So I was just in Japan, a couple of months ago, and the MSCI Inc. ACWI is used by one of our clients, and they raised I think, $75 billion of AUM, on a mutual fund. I actually, they declined wanted to develop a book, like a travel, like a tourist travel book that will have all the different countries and the stock that they will be investing in. So we work together on the publish or on the supported them on the publishing of that book. So that's an example of a big client in Japan who's benefiting from that and all the other competitors of them are very jealous and trying to catch up to them. So I think we see enormous potential of this as the world globalizes, no matter what people say, the world will continue to globalize especially in the capital markets. People are looking for global exposure, not just regional, not just country, not just the US, but global exposures. And I think the role that these benchmarks play is gonna be larger and larger as time goes by.

Thank you. This does conclude the question and answer session of today's program. I'd like to hand the program back to Henry Fernandez for any further remarks.

Well, thanks, everyone, for joining us today. As we have demonstrated here, by our remarks and our financial results, MSCI Inc. is an all-weather franchise. Delivering very strong performance. Sometimes in one part of our business, like ABF. And sometimes in another part of our business in subscription or by the subscription, is we're benefiting from a very balanced approach to our business model. And when one part of it is growing strongly and the other one is not, it gives us incredible benefit. So our footprint is growing fast with all client segments. Existing products with a lot of the existing client segments. And a lot of new client segments that we're very focused on that are part of the whole investment industry that we're expanding on. So our franchise remains great. And remains undervalued in my view as a large shareholder of the company. And we are looking forward to continuing to be a long-term compounder of earnings and growth in the years and decades to come. Thank you for listening to us.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. Good day.