Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Matrix Service Company conference call to discuss results for the first quarter ended September 30. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host for today, Mr. Kevin Cavanah, Vice President and CFO. Sir, you may begin.

Thank you. I would now like to take a moment to read the following. Various remarks the company may make about future expectations, plans and prospects for Matrix Service Company constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, and in subsequent filings made by the company with the SEC. I will now turn the call over to John Hewitt, President and CEO of Matrix Service Company.

Thank you, Kevin, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us on the call this morning. Before discussing our first quarter results, I want to provide some brief comments related to Hurricane Sandy and our operations on the East Coast. First of all, our best wishes, thoughts and prayers are with our employees, family members, friends and the local communities in which we work as they recover from the destruction caused by Hurricane Sandy. Many of our employees in the northeastern U.S. have been working around-the-clock in response to Hurricane Sandy, the health and safety of those individuals and all our employees has been our top priority. All of our offices on the East Coast are up and running and many of our clients are beginning to return to normal operations. I want to thank our employees and all other storm response personnel in the area for their hard work and dedication to improving the condition of those impacted by the storm. Regarding our operations, we continue to execute on our strategic objectives and are satisfied that the business is responding as we expected. The performance in the first quarter was strong and reflects the company's hard work. Our strategic focus areas are beginning to gain traction, supported by continued strength in the markets we serve. Matrix Service Company booked nearly $250 million of new work in the first 3 months of fiscal 2013. Our consolidated backlog continues to increase and was $534.6 million as of September 30, 2012. The company continues to see a strong bid pipeline and new opportunities opening up in connection with our strategic objectives. We have laid the groundwork for this growth in several ways: Key talent additions throughout the organization, re-segmenting to improve both internal and external visibility of our business and launching…

Thanks, John. The revenues for our first quarter were $209.6 million compared to $169.3 million in the same period last year. The 23.8% increase in revenues was due to strong growth in our Electrical Infrastructure, Oil Gas & Chemical, and Storage Solutions segments. As a result of the higher business volumes, we increased our quarterly net income to $4.7 million and our fully diluted EPS to $0.18, as compared to net income of $3.5 million and fully diluted EPS of $0.13 in the first quarter of the prior year. As expected, first quarter earnings include $0.04 per fully diluted share for activity related to our strategic investments, including the rollout of our new brand and support of our storage businesses. Consolidated gross profit increased from $18.1 million in the 3 months ended September 30, 2011, to $22.2 million in the 3 months ended September 30, 2012. The increase of $4.1 million or 22.7%, was primarily due to the higher revenues in the first quarter of the current year. Gross margin of 10.6% were consistent with the prior year. SG&A expenses were $14.3 million in the 3 months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $11.5 million in the same period last year. The increase of $2.8 million was consistent with our plan, with the exception of a $700,000 bad debt charge. SG&A expense as a percent of revenue remained unchanged at 6.8%. The Electrical Infrastructure segment revenues increased from $22 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 to $33.3 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. The increase was primarily due to the increased high-voltage work in the northeastern United States and unexpected storm restoration work in the aftermath of hurricane Isaac. Our gross margins were 14.1% in the first quarter as compared to 12.7% in the same period…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question today comes from the line of Rich Wesolowski from Sidoti & Company. Richard Wesolowski - Sidoti & Company, LLC: When you look at the profitability for your oil and gas and the electrical business lines, they were comfortably above the average expected ranges, the long-term ranges offered by management last quarter. Can we interpret these as seasonally strong results that are going to be watered down by other periods or will we look back from next year's September quarter and say that there is some great onetime jobs in there that shouldn't be expected to be repeated?

I think that when you look at these segments, there's 2 different answers. So if you look at the Electrical Infrastructure segment, we talked about -- we mentioned the storm work from Hurricane Isaac, that had a positive impact, so depending upon what storm restoration work, you might have a recurrence. But if we look long-term on our segment there, we've been operating in that 12% to 13% range the last 1, 1.5 years, so that's what our expectations are right now. On the Oil Gas & Chemical side, it was a very strong quarter from a man-hour perspective. As we've grown geographically, we have seen our man-hours increased during those summer months, we've done a lot of work up in Alaska, and that is contributing to better absorption in that segment. So if we can continue with those volumes, we'll be at the upper end of that margin range and it could exceed at some quarters. I don't believe when you look at the -- for either segment as within the storm work, if you look at any of the projects that we have, there was just some exceptional profits on really high-margin work, it was just a large volume. Richard Wesolowski - Sidoti & Company, LLC: You mentioned on your tank margin, as you did last quarter, that the spread away from Cushing would be in it clients are still offering smaller tank packages, on the latter, where have you seen movement from customers toward large tank passages, have any been bid out and the company has been unsuccessful or mostly being pushed toward the right?

Probably -- maybe some clarity on those couple of words, is that what we're seeing is sort of a trend to smaller tanks and smaller collective packages. So what's that doing is, in some cases, in some of our markets, opening up the door for sort of smaller local contractors that they are able to bid those projects and it makes those projects a little more competitive, but we are seeing in our pipeline many more large volume multi-tank packages, and that's giving us some comfort that we think some of the margins will begin to return to more historic levels. Richard Wesolowski - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Did the company already have bids outstanding for some of those larger packages?

Yes. Richard Wesolowski - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Okay. And then last one, would you remind us where the mining and material handling business is included within your segments?

It's in the Industrial segment. Richard Wesolowski - Sidoti & Company, LLC: Right. And you mentioned in the call that -- excuse me, a project that was won I think after the quarter, and last call, you had mentioned $40 million to $60 million in revenue, is that still valid or is that something that's maybe going to straddle fiscal '13 and '14?

I think we are still targeting that, that range of revenue is possible in this fiscal year and that we would hope that sometime within the next couple of weeks, we'll be able to provide a press release on the project that we mentioned here in the call.

Our next question comes from the line of Mike Harrison from First Analysis.

Just kind of building on the last question on the Industrial business. At a $40 million to $60 million revenue run rate, where would you guys expect operating income to shake out for fiscal '13?

For fiscal '13, I think at some point during the year, when we ramp up the volume, we will flip to where we're earning profits in that business. For the full year, obviously, the operating income percentage will be low, gives that a negative number for this first quarter. So I think longer term, as we look at this segment when we're at a volume where we're at that $60 million run rate for a full year, I think you would expect the operating margins to pump up to the 5%, 6% range.

Okay. And as I look at the sort of the implied SG&A costs in that Industrial segment, it looks like there really was quite a jump this quarter, was that where the bad debt expense was or is that just the kind of start up costs associated with some of the material handling business?

It's 2 things. One, it was where the bad debt charge was recorded. And secondly, when you're looking quarter-over-quarter, if you think about the first quarter of last year, we didn't really -- we were just starting on material handling, and we didn't have anything on Mining and Minerals in there. So we didn't have our Salt Lake office or Tucson office in those numbers. But the $700,000 bad debt charge was in Industrial. It wasn't related to mining and it wasn't related to material handling.

Okay. And then in terms of the impact of Hurricane Sandy, I'm glad to hear that everything is back up and running on your side and that you're seeing customers return to normal, you've got obviously the negative impact of some downtime and then potential positive impact from the emergency repair business and storm related repair. Should we assume that the storm is a net positive for you in the fiscal second quarter?

I would say obviously the assumption would be -- it would probably be a good assumption, at a minimum it would be maybe a neutral, net neutral. Today, we're only a couple of weeks into this cleanup from Hurricane Sandy, and so majority of our focus has been in our -- as we had open the call up, with the safety of our employees and those that are working to do that repair work, we are making sure that they're working in very safe conditions. And as we get more visibility down through the month, as the repairs start to -- and the cleanup begins to get to an end, we'll have more visibility on the impact to our quarter. But I would say the assumption would be that this would be, should at least, would be a neutral impact.

All right. And then last question for you, on the M&A front now that we have some certainty around the election results, are you expecting to see some M&A opportunities move forward before the end of the year, given expected potential tax increase?

I would tell you that the -- there is a -- we've got a shortlisting, a handful of M&A targets that we're in some discussions with now. And that has not been a priority for those business sellers to complete a transaction by the end of the year. So whether they are not concerned about it or realize that at this point in the year, they can't get done anyway, so we're not seeing -- we're not necessarily seeing that pressure by potential targets.

Our next question comes from the line of Tahira Afzhal from KeyBanc.

I guess I just wanted to ask you a [indiscernible] question, several of your peers have talked about good things in particular. Number one, potentially, a lot of petro chem and possibly a very large gas liquids project being built and if you look at the components, there seems to be a lot of work both on that and on the petro chem side that it can be Matrix could take part in. So if you could just give me any kind of color you can outside of LNG as you look at petro chem and you look at GPL, are there any other opportunities for you, and whether you've been approached by sponsors or other companies to joint venture with?

So we think the market, the oil and gas market and NGLs, and in general in chemicals and refining is going to be continue to be strong through the course of the year. There are project opportunities that we have -- are bidding or have been in our pipeline or in our radar screen related to those markets that we are tracking or that we are bidding. And so I would expect that all of those would have some impact on our revenue and backlog as we go through the course of the year.

On the electric T&D side clearly that market is picking up very close to your headquarters, even in Texas, I know you've had more of a presence on the managed side but any comments on whether you'd like to reach really through your footprint?

I think I might have understood your question. We're continuing to focus our footprint for the high-voltage T&D work and substation work in a union environment. We want to continue to strengthen our market presence on the East Coast, and we are looking for opportunities in other union-related areas within the country to expand our service area. At the moment, movement into Texas, I think you asked about Texas or Oklahoma or Gulf Coast for our T&D is not on our radar screen.

Our next question comes from the line of Martin Malloy from Johnson Rice. Martin W. Malloy - Johnson Rice & Company, L.L.C., Research Division: In terms of the acquisition opportunity, you mentioned you were actively pursuing, can you maybe talk a little bit perhaps about what industries or geographic areas that they're in?

I would tell you that what we're pursuing is in 2 of our segments. One is oil gas and chemical and in Electrical Infrastructure. So there are -- both the acquisitions that we're looking at will support either in providing more depth on our services or more geographic reach in either one of those 2 segments. Martin W. Malloy - Johnson Rice & Company, L.L.C., Research Division: Okay. And then on the storage solution side, I guess -- there's a lot of talk about pickup in the construction of Liquids Pipelines in '13 and '14, can you talk a little bit about storage terminalling opportunities that would maybe go along with those projects?

So like we said, the market there has been very strong for us outside of our traditional Cushing hub. Western Canada has been very strong. We are tracking and bidding several terminal opportunities, some of them are just -- not only in Western Canada but in other parts of the U.S. So we're looking at not only the tankage piece but also in some cases, the complete terminal. And there are areas in Louisiana, down to Texas, in Oklahoma as well, up into Wisconsin and Western Canada. So the market continues to be very strong and we're seeing several other projects we would call for us would be large sized tankage and with multiple tank packages.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Matt Duncan from Stephens.

This is actually Stephen in for Matt this morning. Just drilling back down on margins for a second. I just want to make sure I'm understanding you, so out of the E&I and the Oil Gas & Chemical side, I know you noted some kind of a benefit from Hurricane Isaac and from higher utilization of the workforce, did the turnaround work at Oil Gas & Chemical. I guess, going forward, so you expect those 2 segment gross margins to kind of come back down to the normal ranges? I guess E&I was what, 11% to 13%, and Oil Gas & Chemical is 9% to 11%, is that correct in my thinking? And how should we think about that progressing through the year?

So when you look at the Electrical Infrastructure segment, we've consistently been in the 12% to 12.5%, 12.7% range, the last number of quarters, last 5 and 6 quarters in that segment. This quarter, we got some benefit, our traditional business that the margins we expect on that business haven't changed. So short of anything you need, I would expect those margins to be back in that range of 12% to 13%. When you look at the Oil Gas & Chemical, we had a range of 9% to 11%. If you'll recall, the 9% was when we had a low-volume of work going through that segment. Our volume has increased significantly in that segment. And so in that -- I would expect us to be operating at the upper end of that range going forward and that's something we'll be considering whether we need to move that margin guidance for that segment in the future.

And I guess just one other question. On the back log, can you comment on the mix within that backlog? I think the Storage Solutions side, nice sequential pickup in backlog. Are you seeing an improvement in mix there?

I think the backlog story was good for just about every segment. Both Electrical Infrastructure and Storage Solutions segments have a book to bill of over 1.2, Oil Gas & Chemical was pretty much flat for the quarter, and industrial was up, and as we mentioned on the call, we've got a significant Industrial award that will basically double the size of that backlog, so the good thing about backlog story this quarter is that it was good for all 4 segments. So we're seeing positive trends throughout our business.

I'm showing no further questions in queue and would like to turn the conference back over to Mr. John Hewitt for any closing remarks.

I want to thank everybody for participating today, for the good questions and we look forward to talking with you all in the future. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program and you may all disconnect. Have a great rest of the day.