Welcome to MasTec Second Quarter 2014 Earnings Conference Call, initially broadcast on August 12, 2014. Let me remind participants that today’s call is being recorded. At this time, I’d like to turn the call over to Marc Lewis, MasTec’s Vice President of Investor Relations. Marc?

Thank you, Anna, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to MasTec second-quarter 2014 earnings conference call. The following statement is made pursuant to the Safe Harbor for forward-looking statements described in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In these communications, we may make certain statements that are forward-looking, such as statements regarding MasTec’s future results, plans and anticipated trends in the industries where we operate. These forward-looking statements are the company’s expectations on the day of the initial broadcast of this conference call, and the company will make no effort to update these expectations based on subsequent events or knowledge. Various risks, uncertainties and assumptions are detailed in our press releases and filings with the SEC. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize or should any of our underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may differ significantly from results expressed or implied in these communications. In today’s remarks by management, we will be discussing continuing ops financial metrics as discussed and reconciled in yesterday’s press release and supporting schedules. In addition, we may make certain non-GAAP financial measures in this call. A reconciliation of any non-GAAP financial measures not reconciled in these comments to the most comparable GAAP financial measure can be found in our earnings release, our 10-Q, our 10-K or in the Investors and News sections of our website located at mastec.com. With us today, we have Jose Mas, our Chief Executive Officer; and George Pita, our Executive VP and Chief Financial Officer. The format of the call will be opening remarks by Jose, followed by financial review from George. These discussions will be followed by a Q&A period, and we expect the call to last about an hour. We have a lot of important things to talk about today. So, I’d now turn the call over to Jose. Jose?

Thank you, Marc. Good morning, and welcome to MasTec’s 2014 second quarter call. Today, I will be reviewing our second quarter results, as well as providing an outlook for the markets we serve. Before getting started, I’d like to remind everyone that on June 1 we issued updated guidance for the second quarter. At that time, we identified two areas that were causing some short-term pressure. The first was wireless projects being deferred from 2014 to 2015, and the second was some softness in pricing in our oil and gas business. Since that time, we have worked hard to understand both the short and long-term impacts of those unexpected changes. While we are very disappointed with the short-term impact and the corresponding stock price movement, we strongly believe in these two markets, and their ability to provide MasTec with strong growth opportunities for years to come. We believe that over the course of the last few years, we have built a very solid brand in all of the markets we serve. I’m encouraged by the number and scale of our current opportunities, and I strongly believe that our best days are ahead of us. Now, some second quarter highlights. Revenue for the quarter was $1.1 billion, a 13% increase over the prior year second quarter, EBITDA was $106 million, earnings per share were $0.40, and cash flow from operations was $76 million. In summary, we had a quarter in line with our June guidance. Today, our organization is focused on getting through 2014 in the most efficient and profitable manner possible, while at the same time, preparing for 2015 and beyond. As many of you know, over the last couple of years, we have made significant investments in both people and equipment to position us to take advantage of the…

Thank you, Jose, and good morning, everyone. Today, I’ll cover second quarter financial results, Q3 and full-year guidance, along with our cash flow, liquidity, and capital structure. As in our previous calls, when we discuss our financial results and guidance, we will be discussing non-GAAP continuing operations adjusted earnings and adjusted EBITDA. Full reconciliations from GAAP results to adjusted results are included in our Form 10-Q and press release tables. Consistent with prior quarters, our continuing operations adjusted results exclude the first quarter 2013 loss on extinguishment of debt related to refinancing our senior notes due 2017, the final Sintel Spanish litigation charge recorded in the second quarter of 2013, and they also exclude non-cash stock-based compensation expense for all periods. Before I get into detailed results, here are some highlights for the quarter. Second quarter results were in line with our guidance issued in early June despite pressure in our Communications and Oil & Gas segments. We had strong cash flow from operations during the quarter, and reduced our DSOs when compared to Q1 2014 by nine days. We improved our capital structure during the quarter, increasing our financial flexibility and reducing our future financing costs on a rate basis, and we completed a strategic acquisition of Pacer in Canada. Now, let me cover some details regarding second quarter performance. Second quarter 2014 revenue was $1.1 billion, up $127 million or 13% from last year. Highlights include a 6% increase in Communications, a 23% increase in our Oil & Gas segment, and a 49% increase in our Power Generation segment. While the Communications segment, as Jose already noted, grew, second quarter Wireless project revenue increased 12%. We initially anticipated that revenue growth levels in these projects would approximate our first quarter growth levels of almost 30%. Thus, when Wireless…

Thank you. (Operator Instructions) We’ll go first to Noelle Dilts of Stifel.

So I understand that it's somewhat early, but I do want to dig into some of the drivers of improvement in 2015, given that I think that's what is most important to investors at this point. So in the press release you state that you anticipate wireless revenues returning to a normalized level in 2015. But I'm curious as to kind of how you are thinking about normalized, given the strong growth we've seen in that business over the past few years, ranging, by my estimate, from around $600 million to $866 million from ‘10 to ‘13. And I think you were looking for revenues of about $1 billion this year. So some thoughts on what you mean by normalized would be great. And then, when do you anticipate seeing a rebound? Is it going to be early in ‘15, more back-half loaded? Curious on your thoughts there. Thanks.

Sure. We’re not in a position obviously to talk about 2015 guidance. We spent a lot of time over the course of the last month really trying to understand all of our wireless businesses, all of the customer opportunities that are out there. It’s obviously a dynamic field, where there is a lot of changes happening, the Sprint/T-Mobile acquisition falling apart, and what Sprint, I think, is ultimately going to do and the investment that they are going to make in their networks, I think, is a big positive for us and something that hopefully we can take advantage of. If you go back to our original outlook for 2014 and where we were expecting our Wireless business to be, we were actually probably expecting our Wireless business to be closer to about $1.2 billion. We’ll probably end up somewhere in the $900s-million, maybe the low $900s-million, and if I had to guess today and if things go our way and with the outlook and what we see today and what we think 2015 is going to look like, we would hope to try to get it back to the levels that we expected to get to in 2014.

And then second question, just looking at the Pacer acquisition, can you talk a little bit about how much accretion you are now including for Pacer in your ‘14 guidance, and how we should think about accretion on an ongoing basis? And then, could you comment on, when you are looking at the soft oil and gas margins in the quarter, was that diluted by, maybe, breakeven or a loss at Pacer, given that you closed on the acquisition in the quarter?

No, I mean Pacer didn’t really generate a lot for the second quarter. When we look at the full year from Pacer, we’ve got a lot of amortization expenses especially flowing through in 2014, so it’s slightly accretive, but it’s not massively accretive in 2014. As we look beyond 2014, it’s a solid company, we are excited about what they are doing, they are growing their business, they’ve made some investments in joint ventures as well. So, if you look at Pacer and you look at the purchase price that we paid, I think there is two important things to know. One, they had a lot of working capital relative to the size of their business and part of it, we think, we’re going to get back in terms of improving working capital, but there is also a portion of that which was investments in joint ventures of companies that they own, minority positions in, or, let’s say, say 50% positions in, which we think our businesses are going to grow over time, but they are performing very well, they have a very bright outlook, and obviously if you look at our 2015 numbers, we are going to get a full year of Pacer. We’ll probably see, from that, about $150 million pop in ‘15 versus ‘14 based on a full year, so we’re excited about it.

Thank you. We’ll go next to Alex Rygiel of FBR.

Thank you, Jose, and thank you for a lot of the detail on a conference call. I do appreciate it. Couple of questions. First, for a number of years your full-year EBITDA target has been getting ratcheted up. And most recently, I think, your past target was 10%. You are going to fall a little bit below that this year. But could you talk about sort of your company-wide full EBITDA target? Can you get to 10% to 2015? Can you get a lot higher in 2015? If you could address that topic, please.

Sure. If you go back to the beginning of this year, we were obviously hoping to be better than where we’re going to end up. I think we had an internal target of in the low-11s. So if you look at 2015 and where we’re headed, we definitely think we can get to 10%. We think we’ve demonstrated that in the past. But I think as the market improves, as we see growth in our Pipeline business, as our Wireless business comes back to normal, the opportunity for margin improvement is there and we hope to take advantage of that.

Secondly, it sounds like you have got a lot of confidence about many of the opportunities ahead of you. You did mention Canada a number of times as it related to Pacer, and as it related to other opportunities. Can you sort of address the Canadian opportunity over the next two to three years in a little bit more detail?

I think in the last year we’ve made a lot of investments there. We obviously bought Pacer, we bought Big Country last year. We are very bullish on the oil and gas sector in Canada and what’s going to happen there both in the short and long term. There has been a lot of, obviously, press and dialogue on what’s happening in the transmission market in Canada. It’s a market that we haven’t necessarily penetrated. We think Pacer helps us with our ability to do that. So we are very encouraged in both of those markets. I think they offer an enormous amount of potential for the industry and we hope to take advantage of our share there.

Thank you. We’ll go next to Andrew Kaplowitz of Barclays.

Jose, so your oil and gas backlog rose. But if you exclude Pacer, it was probably down, which means it essentially has been flat or down in each quarter for a year now. And you have talked about that, so that's not unexpected. But you have also talked about larger bookings starting to hit late this year and next year. And you also know about all the chatter that has been out there regarding MasTec's relationship with certain large pipeline customers. So, maybe you could talk about your confidence level that backlog in the business is going to increase going forward, and maybe talk about timing?

Sure. The challenge for us in oil and gas has always been when -- last year, we were an early beneficiary of the long-haul construction starting. We obviously were awarded large contracts, which obviously moved the needle significantly on backlog. I think that’s how it’s going to happen. I think we’re going to get some very large award that’s going to increase the backlog in a sizable way. You’re going to work that off over time, and you get another sizable award and it ratchets it up again. So I don’t think you’re going to see consistent predictable growth in backlog in that sector, because I don’t think that’s the way it’s contracted at least in our business. So we’re going to have sizable awards, it’s going to move the needle. We are going to work off some of that. Hopefully, we’ll be able to continue to replace that and grow that over time, and that’s how we expect it to happen. Our outlook on that has not changed. We expect the backlog to be down as we work through some of the larger jobs we were doing in 2014. We expect to replenish that in the short to near-term, and really our outlook on that hasn’t changed one bit.

Okay, fine. And then, Jose, it looks like you have guided to about a 20% drop-off in revenue in 4Q versus 3Q versus the usual drop-off, around 10%. And you gave good color around those communications being a little lower in 4Q, the same thing with oil and gas in terms of timing. Is that all this is? I guess the issue that we have is that -- can Communications, can that business pick up pretty quickly as you go into the first half of next year, because maybe 1-gigabit really starts up pretty quickly next year, because it looks like you have to pick up pretty quickly from, probably, some weather-induced 4Q issues as well.

The short answer is yes. When you look at our Wireless business, we were on pace to obviously have a very good year and to have a year just like what we were expecting. With a lot of the deferrals that happened, it’s obviously impacting the second half of the year much greater than it’s in the first half of the year and it’s impacting the fourth quarter probably more than any other particular quarter of the year, and the reason is, we’re working as much of the work as we can now. As we finish that work to the extent that that work doesn’t get replenished in calendar year ‘14, it creates an issue for us and you are seeing that in the fourth quarter. So the biggest driver of our fourth-quarter drop is the fact that we’ve got a considerable reduction of Wireless revenues both of where we’ve been on a year-over-year basis, and more importantly, where it was versus original expectations. So that’s by far the biggest driver in Q4. We expected our oil and gas business to be down slightly in Q4 on a year-over-year basis when we first put our guidance in the year, so that’s not unexpected. It’s maybe slightly lower than what we were originally expecting, but the reality is that our biggest driver in the fourth quarter is what’s happening in our Wireless business. When we look at 2015, we think two things are going to happen in Wireless. We think it’s going to be a much more consistent year, a lot more similar to 2013, so if you look at our Q2, Q3, Q4 of last year in Wireless, it was a very consistent trend from a revenue perspective. We think we’ll get back to that in the Wireless business, and we think we’ll get back to that in a bigger business. We think it will be a bigger business that will be more consistent. It won’t be front or back-end loaded. It would just be a more consistent year, which we think is really important for us, not only from a revenue perspective, but also what we think we can do with that from a margin perspective.

Thank you. We’ll go next to Dan Mannes of Avondale Partners.

A quick follow-up on wireless, and maybe just a clarification for me, as you look to the guidance for the second half of the year and the way you are thinking about ‘15, the margin contraction you are seeing, can you maybe help us out with how much of that is your maintenance of overhead in anticipation of a recovery versus maybe the loss of maybe some of the higher-margin work you have historically done? Can you maybe help us understand that a little bit more?

It has nothing to do with higher-margin work versus lower-margin work. That’s not really what’s driving the results. What’s driving the results is our anticipation of 2014 being a significant growth year on the wireless side, our reaction to that in terms of gearing up for that potential increase. So there is no question that when you look at 2014 versus 2013, we significantly added cost in the first half of the year to prepare ourselves for what we thought was going to be substantial growth, that growth isn’t there. We’re trying to manage those costs as best as we can. So we have done a lot in terms of right sizing the organization. Are we fully there? Probably, not. But at the same time, we’re trying to manage that with what we think happens in 2015. So we’re not going to right-size the business to 2014 levels, because we are very confident that 2014 levels are not reflective of what our Wireless business is going to look like long term, so we’re not going to make a short-term decision that affects our ability to execute in that business over the mid-to-long term. So we’re going to take some pain in 2014 to be in a position to hopefully execute on the opportunities that are there and demonstrate that in 2015. The sad part about all this is we’ve done that consistently year over year over year. We’ve had phenomenal growth in that business, back all the way to 2008. We’re having a very tough year both from a comp perspective and from what we’re doing on a growth perspective in terms of adding cost, but we are highly confident that come 2015, we are going to be able to demonstrate that we made the right decisions.

And just to follow up on that point, obviously you are showing a lot of commitment to this business and the expected growth there, recovery in spend by your primary customers. I know in the past you talked about, I guess, the TCAP program and things like that. Any commitment they are showing to you, or guarantees, or anything like that in terms of their plan for a spending recovery that enhances your confidence?

Obviously, our opinions and where we are at any given point in time is based on discussions that we’re having with all of our customers. So again we feel very strongly that 2015 is going to be a very good year for us in Wireless, both from a revenue perspective and where we think we are going to be able to do from a margin perspective. So we are not -- I mean we’re not saying this in a bubble. This isn’t just our opinion. We’ve got enough data that helps us get there and we feel strongly about it. Are we 100% certain, can I guarantee it? Obviously, I can’t. We are in the position that we’re in ’14. So we are taking everything with a grain of salt, we’re managing it as close as we can, but we are highly confident of what’s going to happen in 2015.

Thank you. We’ll go next to Jason Wangler of Wunderlich Securities.

I know it's a stuff that's hard to talk about, but as far as that, the 1-gigabit work, is that just one client, or is there multiple clients involved in that? And maybe also just is that one contractor, or is that a lot of different areas that you'd be working?

So, couple of things. When we talk about 1-gigabit, I think the most important part of the discussion is the size of the opportunity globally in the market. I think you are going to have a number of different carriers that are going to be very active in doing their 1-gigabit work. I think it’s going to create enormous opportunities for the industry. I think the opportunities are much greater than people quite understand. I think we are in for an incredible cycle in that business that’s going to help the whole industry, and quite frankly us and all of our peers. Specifically about our awards, we’re really not going to get into a lot of detail on that. The only thing I’ll say is we do expect further awards as the year rolls on in 2014, so I think this is the start of something that will ultimately be a lot bigger and we’re really excited about that. It really moves the needle in that business for us.

And then, maybe for George, obviously you got the first tranche of the converts done, looking into December, and you talked about all the cash that you guys would be generating. Is there still a thought process of looking at that from an aspect of taking those out? I know that you've talked in the past about share repurchases and things not necessarily being something to look at, but I guess it could almost be de facto in that nature. Is that still something that's on the table as we get to December?

We have all the flexibility as we mentioned before. We can convert those typically either in all-cash, all-stock or any combination thereof, and certainly we are evaluating all alternatives for the second half of this year. So we do have that flexibility and we will continue to evaluate it and proceed in what we think is the best manner for ourselves and our shareholders.

Thank you. We’ll go next to Tahira Afzal with KeyBanc. Tahira Afzal – KeyBanc: Good morning, folks, and good quarter, given everything that's happening. So I guess the first question is on the pipeline side, Jose. You folks have started some lending abilities or borrowing abilities or transactions on the Bessel side. And based on our channel check, it seems like some of the large Mexican pipeline stuff is now sort of headed into bidding. So as you look at your actual prospect list for the second half of the year, how would you kind of split it up in terms of what you see in U.S., Canada, and perhaps Mexico in terms of awards?

What’s exciting is that all three markets are really strong and all three markets offer tremendous opportunity. I think you will see us take advantage of those opportunities in all three markets. Especially, when you look at the next couple of years, it’s going to be very active. We are excited about it. We’re really excited. We think obviously the U.S. has been our bread and butter, and we think we are going to perform really well there. We’ve made a lot of investments in Canada that we think will really pay off, and we are very bullish on what’s happening in Mexico, and we think we are going to be a player, and we are very engaged in that process right now.

And second question is back on the gig of fiber side. Your comments that it is potentially bigger versus what is currently being perceived, to a great extent, how would you sort of - how do you get comfortable around that? Is that really based on the discussions you are having across the board, so not only with one or two first initial movers? Is that what it's kind of based on?

Every time you pick a publication in the telecommunications sector, it’s got a carrier talking about building out 1-gigabit capabilities and what you are seeing is, you’re seeing multiple markets today where you have multiple carriers building in the same markets, which is really going to stress those individual markets and the workload and the capacity of work -- capable of people performing in those markets. I think that’s a very, very positive trend in our industry, and I think it’s going to continue. I think it’s going to continue for a long time, and those that are engaged in that business are going to benefit from it.

Thank you. We’ll take our next question from Adam Thalheimer of BB&T Capital Markets. Adam Thalheimer - BB&T Capital Markets: Jose, I wanted to dig in a little bit on the outlook for Wireless next year. The outlook there, is that -- some of the work that you came into 2014 thinking was going to happen with the cell site of the future and that type of program from AT&T, is the growth in ‘15 just if that specific work gets pushed into ‘15? Or is it that there will be other work from AT&T, or maybe you picked up more territories from AT&T, or maybe it's the Sprint ramp?

We’ve said a couple of things over the course of the last year, one, we wanted to diversify our customer base. We think we made good inroads in that in ’13. Obviously, we think we are doing well in that in 2014, but there’s been a lot of industry challenges relative to what’s happening in the industry and the shakeup in the industry. I think in 2015, you are going to see more of that from us. I think we’re going to have the opportunity to work for multiple customers, because I think multiple customers are going to be extremely busy. I think that’s going to be part of our driver. Obviously, we think we have a great relationship with AT&T who is our primary customer in that business. We are encouraged about their go-forward plans and the things that they need. We’ve been supporting them for a long time and we are going to continue to do so. So we’ve really never talked about one specific technology. I don’t think the cell site of the future has ever even come out of our mouths. So I think that’s something more about stuff that’s just written out there. We’re excited about the opportunities with all of our customers in that business. We are excited about where we think spend levels go. Again, all of these carriers, the differentiation of their products have a lot to do with their networks, which I think is going to drive a lot of investments in those networks over time. It’s what we do. We will play a role in that, an important role in that, for multiple carriers and that’s what’s going to drive our business. Adam Thalheimer - BB&T Capital Markets: And then on the $250 million award, is that from an existing customer or a new customer? And what are your thoughts about margins on 1-gigabit work versus wireless work?

I’ll answer the second part of it first. Wireline margins for us have dragged our Communication margins for a long time. If you go back into the mid-2000s, our wireline margins were probably as good as any business that we had, and then you have the downturn of the real estate market, which really negatively impacted wireline work in general from a volume perspective, which ultimately drove it from a margin perspective. So we feel real good about that business coming back. We think that as utilization levels improve and you get a lot of work in certain markets, it’s going to give you the ability to really generate nice margins. We’ve performed well on our Communications margin. We would probably go into a thinking that they are going to be slightly less than our full segment margins, although we obviously would hope to get there over time. So we’re encouraged by it. There is going to be a lot of work. Pricing will change over the long term as more capacity gets eaten up in that business. We’re excited about it. We’re going to be working 1-gigabit work for multiple customers over the next couple of years, and at this point, we’re really not going to get into customer breakdown on that.

We’ll go next to William Bremer of Maxim Group. Mr. Bremer, your line is open, please go ahead. And we’ll move on to Vishal Shah of Deutsche Bank.

Jose, you talked about pricing challenges in the oil and gas segment. Are you still seeing that? Has that made an improvement in that segment? And the second-half transmission segment growth, is it going to come from large transmission? Are you also seeing growth in some of the other areas? And how should we think about the margins in that business in the second half?

Sure. So when we look at oil and gas, our margins in the second half are getting better than they were in the first half. Part of that is driven by a slight improvement from what we saw earlier in the year from pricing environment. So we have seen improvements, the answer is yes. With that said, it’s still a competitive market out there. There is a lot of capacity. Again, there is a lot of work coming, and I think that capacity is going to get sucked up in rather short order, but until it does, I think it does impact some of the shorter-term work, in the meantime which I think we’ve seen and will continue to see through year-end.

On transmission, we would expect continued improvement in the second half over the first half level. I mentioned in my comments that we expect to not to be quite as high as Q2, but we would expect improvement from the first half levels in the Transmission EBITDA margins.

And yes, we are seeing increase in some of the larger work. It’s becoming a larger percentage of what we do. It will change quarter-to-quarter. We are still active on some of the smaller projects. Quite frankly it’s where we’ve struggled more from a margin perspective over the last couple of years. So we’re definitely emphasizing the larger project work where we’ve been better from an economic standpoint, but we will continue to play in both markets.

And then you mentioned you could get back to the $1.2 billion run rate in communications next year. Given the mix impact, what do you think the margins could look like, given the 1-gigabit opportunity is going to be lower-margin business than some of the wireless?

Look, I mean when you look at last year, we ran just over 12.5 points in EBITDA margin. We’re obviously talking about being couple of hundred basis points below that on a full-year basis in 2014. So, I think the opportunity will be there to definitely get back to those levels and over time especially as the 1-gigabit opportunity increases, I think we could potentially see margins improving.

Thank you. We’ll go next to Veny Aleksandrov of FIG Partners.

My first question is on the wind. You said that the pipeline is building. Can you give us a little bit of details how these projects are shaping? Is it going to be starting late ‘14, but really impacting ’15 and ‘16? What is the regulatory framework right now?

Veny, I missed the first part of it, which business are you talking about?

Wind.

Wind. So, we’re obviously having a very good year this year. We talked about doing $400 million of revenue in 2014, which is consistent with what we’ve been saying probably for the last year. So we are up nicely in that business in ‘14 versus ’13. We are very encouraged about 2015. In our commentary, we talked about already having just over $200 million of backlog for ’15. The activity for projects, both through the end of ‘14 and ‘15 is extremely active right now. So we’re in a much better spot at this point in time relative to ‘15 than we were at this point in time relative to ‘14 last year. But I think it’s still too early to tell. So we’re not really ready to talk about ‘15 in a big way other than to say we expect ‘15 to be just a strong gas ’14, if not, better.

And then installable home, you haven't talked about this business for a while. With everything happening in the industry, what’s happening? Was this business stable? Has it been growing so far in ‘14? The new areas that you were going? Kind of a little bit more details there, if you could.

Yes. So we said it’s up 7% year-over-year. A lot of that growth is driven by our security initiatives, which is really where our growth is coming from. So we feel good about that. We think that’s going to continue to grow. Obviously, AT&T has announced the acquisition of DIRECTV. We expect it to close some time in the middle of 2015, and we’re working with both customers and I think that will accelerate our involvement in that over the course of the next six, seven months, but we feel good about it. So the business for us is always, it’s a stable business. I think that growth is going to be driven by how aggressively they go after customers. I think we are somewhat hopeful that DIRECTV -- that AT&T will take a little bit more of an aggressive position than DIRECTV has over the last couple of years in terms of customer additions and if they do that, that should bode very well for that business.

Thank you. We’ll go next to Will Gabrielski of Stephens.

The CapEx cuts are pretty material, half on half. I'm just wondering which business you are pulling back in most around CapEx; or have you just achieved the plan you thought you would get to more quickly?

We’ve talked a lot about in the last year the investments that we’ve made in equipment. We’ve also talked about our ability to manage the business at a much lower CapEx rate than we’ve been generating. Obviously, we’ve been trying to get ready for growth, nothing is changed. The oil and gas business as it comes back, we are in a very good position to man that with both resources and equipment, and depending on the growth profile of the business and how much we win and how fast it grows, then we will temper that CapEx based on what we need. But we feel good about what we’re spending. We think it meets all of our needs. We are in a good position relative to the growth opportunities ahead of us, and to the extent that we can manage that, we are going to manage that.

When you think about the growth, you are talking about potentially in wireless next year, the comps are still pretty tough first half of ‘15 versus first half of ‘14. So is that growth going to be second-half weighted, or is it too early to say?

Obviously, our second half comps next year are going to be a lot better than our first half comps. So you’re going to see more growth in the second half than you will in the first, but we would expect with what we know today the first half to be not dramatically different than what the first half of 2014 was.

And then just lastly, in terms of pricing on the oil and gas side, during your update mid-quarter you talked about it basin-specific, maybe some more pricing weakness in some specific basins, has it spread outside of where you were seeing it?

We’ve seen competition everywhere, so the different basins which is where a lot of the shale work is today, which is where a lot of people are trying to working as some of the long-haul work comes to fruition, I think it’s broad-based. I think obviously some shales are more effective than others. We think across the board, competition has been high across the shales and more so than it had been in previous years. So really no change in what we were seeing. Earlier this year, with the exception that we’ve probably seen a little bit of uptick in pricing in pricing.

But is it new entrants? Or is it lack of demand?

It’s a combination of everybody.

Thank you. We’ll go next to John Rogers of D.A. Davidson.

Jose, I just wanted to follow up on the oil and gas side. Your optimism relative to the project opportunities coming for you in 2015, first of all, when do you have to start to book that work to fill up your schedule for ’15, and is that something we will see this year?

We’ve said all along probably since last year that we expected awards for ‘15 to start in late 2014. I don’t know that our views have dramatically changed on that. Could it slip into the beginning of ’15? It could. But our view hasn’t really changed in the last 12 months. There is a lot of dialogue going on. There is a lot of projects that are on the board that are being discussed, and we think there is going to be a lot of activity. So really our view hasn’t really changed on that.

And is it your hope, expectation that this is the long-haul pipe that we will see that presumably is a little less competitive or fewer qualified contractors?

Again, we’re going to see a massive increase in that portion of the business. I do think there is less players there obviously, and I think as they fill up, it affects everything because as the bigger contractors get fuller than their participation in the shale and their interest in the shale somewhat weans, which improves all the shale business too. So it really affects the whole business, the whole market and we’ve talked about that for a long time. We’ve talked about what we think the pricing pressure is across the entire industry. It starts with long-haul being active and as long long-haul gets active, I think it’s good for the whole industry, and I think we’re on the cusp of that happening.

At this point we are over time, and our final question comes from William Bremer of Maxim Group.

Could we just go into a little more granularity on the backlog per segment? Maybe give us a little insight of the makeup a little bit there, if you don't mind, in some of the pricing components. Your backlog in some of the segments have grown very, very nicely, and just want to get a little color in terms of the overall pricing and the makeup there.

The biggest change in backlog was not in our communications sector, the anticipated reduction in wireless revenues for the balance of 2014. That’s really what drove our reduction in communications backlog. The way we calculate backlog and MSAs is we take the current run rate and kind of annualize it for 18 months, which is what we’ve done. We don’t think it’s a true reflection on what the backlog of that business is, but that’s how we calculate it, so that’s how we calculated it for this quarter, which led to the decline. In oil and gas, as previously mentioned, we obviously had the addition of Pacer’s backlog in that business. Outside of Pacer, it was down slightly as expected, because as we work off big projects, until we win the next big project, we want see a sizable increase there. We think that’s coming. Outside of that, I think backlog was pretty much in line with where it’s historically been and we wouldn’t expect many changes to that as we go forward.

And then just a quick follow-up on long-haul, can you give us a sense of what you are seeing in terms of the bidding opportunities, not just domestically, but Mexico as well as Canada? And would you need to perform some type of acquisition to execute in the Mexican region?

We don’t think so. So we’ve talked a little bit about Canada, the investments that we’ve made. We’re again very bullish on that market. We think the U.S. market is going to be very active for a long time and we’re very encouraged about what’s happening in Mexico. There is a number of big projects that are in play currently, and we think we’ve got a real good opportunity to win some and be active down there. We think we can do that. We’ve worked real hard down there. We have had a presence down there now for a good period of time and we think we’re in a really good position to execute. So, we expect all three markets to be very good for us. Obviously, the bread-and-butter markets for us are the U.S. and Canada, because we’ve got so much investment there, but we are incredibly encouraged about what’s happening in Mexico and our ability to perform there.

Thank you. With no further questions, I’d like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Jose Mas for any additional or closing remarks.

So again, I just want to thank everybody’s participation. I know we did this call a little bit later than usual. We look forward to getting back on to our normal schedule starting next quarter, and look forward to updating everybody. So thank you.

That does conclude today’s conference. Thank you for your participation.