Thank you for standing by, and welcome to Micron's Third Quarter 2025 Financial Call. As a reminder, today's program is being recorded. And now I'd like to introduce your host for today's program, Satya Kumar, Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, and welcome to Micron Technology's Fiscal Third Quarter 2025 Financial Conference Call. On the call with me today are Sanjay Mehrotra, our Chairman, President and CEO; and Mark Murphy, our CFO. Today's call is being webcast from our Investor Relations site at investors.micron.com, including audio and slides. In addition, the press release detailing our quarterly results has been posted on the website, along with the prepared remarks for this call. Before we begin, let me remind everyone that today's discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding our future financial and operating performance, including our guidance as well as trends and expectations in our business, market, industry and regulatory and other matters. These statements are based on our current assumptions, and we assume no obligation to update these statements. Please refer to our most recent financial report on Form 10-K and our other filings with the SEC for more information on these risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. Today's discussion of financial results is presented on a non-GAAP financial basis unless otherwise specified. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures can be found on our website. We encourage you to visit our website at micron.com throughout the quarter for the most current information on the company, including information on financial conferences that we may be attending. You can also follow us on LinkedIn, X and YouTube. I'll now turn the call over to Sanjay.

Thank you, Satya. Good afternoon, everyone. Micron's strong competitive position and solid execution delivered record revenue in fiscal Q3 with revenue, gross margin and EPS all exceeding the high end of our guidance ranges. Data center revenue more than doubled year-over-year and reached a record level, and consumer-oriented markets had strong sequential growth. We generated substantial free cash flow in the quarter, even as we continue to make strategic investments critical to sustain long-term growth. I'm thankful to all our Micron team members for their focus and execution, which made these results possible. In fiscal Q3, DRAM revenue reached a new record driven by a nearly 50% sequential growth in HBM revenue. We remain the sole supplier in volume production of LPDRAM in the data center. In NAND, we achieved a new quarterly record for market share across data center SSDs as well as client SSDs in calendar Q1. For the first time ever, during calendar Q1, Micron has become the #2 brand by share in data center SSDs according to third-party data. Looking ahead to fiscal Q4, we see a robust demand environment and expect to grow revenue by 15% sequentially to a record $10.7 billion at guidance midpoint. In June, we have completed a strategic reorganization of our business units around key market segments to capitalize on the tremendous AI growth opportunity ahead. As high-performance memory and storage becomes increasingly critical to enabling AI- driven innovation, this new structure enhances Micron's ability to engage more deeply with customers by shifting more resources to AI-focused opportunities across our portfolio. We are making excellent progress on our 1-gamma DRAM technology node with yields ramping ahead of the record pace we have achieved on our 1-beta node. We completed several key product milestones during the quarter, including the first qualification sample…

Thank you, Sanjay, and good afternoon, everyone. Micron delivered strong results in fiscal Q3 with revenue, gross margin and EPS all above the high end of the guidance ranges provided in our last earnings call. Total fiscal Q3 revenue was $9.3 billion, up 15% sequentially and up 37% year-over-year and a quarterly revenue record for Micron. Higher sequential revenue was driven by growth across our end markets, including record data center revenues and strong sequential growth in consumer-oriented markets. Fiscal Q3 DRAM revenue was $7.1 billion, up 51% year-over-year and represented 76% of total revenue. Sequentially, DRAM revenue increased 15% with bit shipments increasing over 20% and prices decreasing in the low single-digit percentage range, primarily due to a higher consumer-oriented revenue mix. Fiscal Q3 NAND revenue was $2.2 billion, up 4% year-over-year and represented 23% of Micron's total revenue. Sequentially, NAND revenue increased 16% with bit shipments increasing in the mid-20s percentage range and prices decreasing in the high single-digit percentage range. Now turning to revenue by business unit. Compute and Networking Business Unit revenue was $5.1 billion, up 11% sequentially and a quarterly record. This performance was driven by a nearly 50% sequential increase in HBM along with growth in our high-capacity DRAM and low-power server DRAM. Revenue for the Storage Business Unit was $1.5 billion, up 4% sequentially. This growth was primarily driven by an increase in consumer-oriented revenue. Mobile Business Unit revenue was $1.6 billion, up 45% sequentially. Sequential revenue growth was due to reduced customer inventories and strong demand from DRAM content growth. Embedded Business Unit revenue was $1.2 billion, up 20% sequentially, supported by growth in industrial and consumer embedded markets. The consolidated gross margin for fiscal Q3 was 39%, up 110 basis points sequentially and up 250 basis points versus the midpoint of…

[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Timothy Arcuri from UBS.

Sanjay, I wanted to ask sort of how you see the HBM TAM scaling with the accelerator TAM. One thing that's been clear over the past 3 months or so is that the accelerated TAM is definitely upsiding and growing a lot. And it seems -- if I take their projections and I take your HBM projections, it kind of seems like the HBM market is going to remain 15% to 20% of what the overall accelerator market is. I guess, how do you see the HBM TAM scaling with that market? And then is there some sort of limit or like asymptote that we begin to reach in terms of HBM attached to these GPUs and these custom ASICs?

With respect to HBM growth, we certainly see that HBM demand grows in the future. I'll tell you that in this year, if you look at calendar year '25, HBM is growing from last year about $18 billion in revenue to approximately $35 billion in calendar year '25. We see in calendar year '26, if you look at HBM bit demand growth, it will significantly exceed the overall DRAM industry demand growth. And of course, the transition from 8-high to 12-high in HBM in '26, transition to HBM4 as well, which is even a higher-value product, all of that essentially bodes well in terms of the value of HBM and the overall need for HBM in these accelerator platforms that are, of course, evolving fast. And of course, our customers are very much focused on working with us and looking at their platforms, assessing the mix of 12- high and HBM4. And then when we look at '27, that goes into HBM4E. '28 starts introducing customization in HBM as well. So the trajectory of HBM in terms of the value proposition in these accelerators continues to be strong and healthy. And of course, we are well positioned. We -- as we shared with you, we have already begun to sample our HBM4 products. And these -- again, we plan to maintain our leadership with respect to specifications here, and we have certainly demonstrated a capacity ramp-up as well. So we remain excited about HBM. We see this as clearly a strong growth driver as well as value driver for our business.

And our next question comes from the line of Vivek Arya from Bank of America Securities.

I wanted to talk about gross margins. So first, what is driving the upside sequentially? And then is this the new baseline for gross margins? And then what would be kind of the puts and takes as we look at the next few quarters beyond Q4?

Yes. Vivek, it's Mark. So in the third quarter, I think maybe start with what happened in gross margin in the third quarter. We had a strong sequential volume growth in the quarter. But versus the guide, the defining factor was we had -- prices were down, as I said in the opening comments, but we had better-than-expected pricing that drove the margin improvement versus expectations. I'll add, too, that we had good cost performance and all. But certainly, the price was better than we had expected. Now that carries on into rebaselining on the fourth quarter. So we provided an indication of the fourth quarter before when the market was in transition, and we said at that time that the inventory outlook that we would -- was improving when it weakened a bit late last year. And we had intended to work to inflect price. And as you know, a few weeks later, the situation with the Liberation Day tariffs, the environment got a bit more challenging. The condition of the market is better than expected since then, and it strengthened through the quarter. You saw that outperformance. And then we've executed well. And so what you see here from this rebaseline of the business, you see us add to that through favorable mix Q3 to Q4. That's more DRAM growth than NAND, so you have favorable mix there, and then more data center than consumer- oriented mix, which was weighing down the margins in the third quarter. So yes, so it's -- again, it's a continued good market backdrop. We're going to continue to focus on pricing. But third quarter to fourth quarter, we have favorable mix effects that is helping drive margins up to the current guide of 42%.

And anything beyond this mark? Any puts and takes as we look at the next several quarters? Is this kind of the new baseline? Or is it going to be entirely dependent on the direction of pricing?

Yes. We're not going to provide Q1 guidance. We are positive on the trajectory of the business. The market environment does remain constructive, particularly in DRAM versus NAND. Again, we're focused on pricing and making sure to put our bets in the right places. As we said in the prepared remarks, our inventories are very tight, particularly on leading edge and then now even pockets of some of the legacy and DRAM. So we're going to have some bit constraints going into first quarter, but we're going to mix to DRAM, higher- value DRAM and higher-value NAND products. And so we think gross margins can be up.

And our next question comes from the line of CJ Muse from Cantor Fitzgerald.

I was hoping to revisit your comments on HBM. So you're talking 23%, 24% market share. And it sounds like you're now calling not exiting the year but sometime in the second half. So that's coming in better. And so I guess first question is, should we be thinking that, that number is kind of a 22%, 23% depending, I guess, on seasonality of the $35 billion number? And then perhaps more importantly, as you think about HBM growth in calendar '26, how should we be thinking about the contributions to that growth, both from bits as well as higher ASPs as you go to next-generation products?

C.J., I didn't quite understand the question around 22%, 23%. What exactly did you say there?

Just trying to understand how you talked about getting to your DRAM market share, which I think you said 23%, 24% for the HBM market. And your previous comments were exiting the year. Now you're saying sometime in the second half. So trying to get an idea of kind of what that revenue number looks like.

We are already at -- if you look at our performance based on FQ3, we are already at more than $6 billion run rate here with our HBM and certainly continuing to ramp up our HBM output, shifting production to 12-high HBM as well. So yes, it could be that compared to what we said before in terms of toward the end of the calendar year, we expect to get to our HBM share in line with our DRAM share. So versus that, it could be that we do end up getting to our industry share for -- in line with industry share for HBM share earlier than that. So it could be. And that's really absolutely based on our very, very strong execution and strong execution in terms of output, in terms of yield ramp. We noted that our 12-high yield ramp is actually going faster than our 8-high yield ramp, of course, built on all the learning that we have had. The team has done an excellent job with capacity ramp as well. All of that is contributing to our strong performance on HBM. Extremely pleased with where we are and extremely pleased with not just execution today and our ability to ramp up yield and capacity successfully and built in the process trust with the customers, but very pleased with the road map that is ahead for us for HBM as well. So I mean these are things that will obviously play an important role in calendar year '26 as we work closely with the customers to understand their overall mix requirements for 2026.

And our next question comes from the line of Thomas O'Malley from Barclays.

Two here. So my first on the HBM side, you're obviously reaching your share target a little bit earlier. Going into next year, are you guys ready to talk about what you think that your normalized share will be? Obviously, there's difficulties with some of your competitors getting qualified. If that continues into next year, do you guys have a view of if you're able to increase capacity, and if you are, what that share may look like? And then two, on the NAND side, where does utilization stand today? And obviously, you're going through some of the transitions right now internally, which has allowed you to kind of keep some things offline. But as you move into next year, what is your plan for utilization? Is that going to be market dependent? Or at some point, do you need to start bringing on utilization just from the fact that there's a gross margin headwind?

So as I said, we are very pleased that we are executing well and with what we told you several quarters ago in terms of our share objectives with HBM that we are going to be able to achieve that goal for this year in second half of '26. Now our HBM is really at scale. It has a healthy share and we are successfully delivering. So going forward, of course, this becomes like part of our overall product portfolio and just like we manage the rest of the portfolio with respect to total I on ROI and profitability. And of course, HBM really positions us very well with respect to our profitability objectives. We will, of course, continue to manage the mix of our products in the portfolio, including that of HBM, including the share that sometimes can move around in different parts of the end market segments that we address. So I think that's how you have to look at it. Overall, really very pleased with our HBM products, 12-high as well as HBM4 built with our well-proven 1-beta technology, which also gives us cost-effective benefits. And of course, the packaging technology, well established. And company, of course, has been investing in expanding our HBM back-end capacity as well. We have talked about investments in Singapore, bringing assembly and packaging capacity there in line, starting production, targeting that for 2027 time frame. And I'll tell you that HBM, given that it uses our well-proven 1-beta technology, is really fungible capacity with the rest of the portfolio as well. So this gives us plenty of flexibility in terms of managing our business and extremely focused on really meeting customers' requirements and continuing to deliver and enhance our product capabilities to meet their growing requirements. And your second question around NAND in terms of utilizations, so we have said before that toward the end of fiscal '25, our NAND overall capacity would be down versus end of fiscal '24 by about 10%. And that's a structural reduction in capacity. And of course, as we have discussed before, that structural reduction was implemented to achieve capital-efficient next node transition for us like G9 node transition. So as that capacity has come down, of course, our underutilization has come down as well, although part of NAND continues to remain underutilized. I must note here that, of course, leading edge of NAND is fully utilized.

And our next question comes from the line of Harlan Sur from JPMorgan.

If I rewind back 1 year ago during your June earnings call, you guys did say back then that you were sold out on your HBM supply through calendar '25 and that majority of that committed supply was locked in from a pricing perspective. One year later, where are you on your negotiations for your calendar '26 HBM supply and pricing discussions? Is the team's supply outlook for next year fully committed, too? Or maybe a better way to frame it, right, because I know that the HBM3E and HBM4 12-high qualification cycles might be taken a bit longer, but maybe the other way to frame it is, if you look at your customers' calendar '26 forecasted demand for HBM, is it exceeding your forecasted supply capability?

With respect to HBM in 2025, yes, very pleased that what we told you back a year ago, we are continuing to deliver on that, as I said earlier. And yes, our HBM is sold out for 2025. And as I mentioned earlier, we are working closely with our customers as their platforms, AI accelerated platforms, both with GPUs as well as with ASICs, are continuing to evolve and move fast. And they themselves are working on overall their supply chain requirements and product mix with respect to HBM3E 12-high as well as HBM4. So we continue to work with the customers in those, and we are still in the middle of '25 and for 2026. As I said earlier, we see, with respect to bit demand growth, strong trend in 2026, bit demand growth for HBM significantly exceeding DRAM demand growth. And of course, we have a strong product road map. And we are working on continuing. As we said, we sampled HBM4, focused on getting these products qualified with the customers. And HBM3E 12-high is already in volume productions and doing very well with our yield ramp there as well. So very much focused on addressing the '26 needs for the customers and executing well and remaining extremely focused on our execution for 2026.

And our next question comes from the line of Joseph Moore from Morgan Stanley.

I wonder if you could talk in terms of your long-term CapEx plans and the sort of 35% of revenue levels. Is that kind of a reasonable guideline to think about for fiscal '26? Or are you thinking because of the opportunity here you need to invest ahead of that?

Yes. Joe, I mean we have a generational tech transition opportunity in front of us that Micron is exceptionally well positioned for. And we've talked about inventory levels for some time now, getting leaner, especially, being very tight on the leading edge. And with the silicon requirements of HBM and with trade ratio, we need to build greenfield capacity. So that's underway. If you look at our CapEx forecast, we had a little bit lower CapEx than we expected in the quarter at $2.7 billion, but you'll see by the guide that we're going to see that CapEx increase in the fourth quarter. So we stuck with our approximately $14 billion number. I think as we go forward, we're continuing to build out the greenfield capacity, and there'll be equipment installs on the new nodes. There's grants involved and construction. So the timing of that spend can be a bit lumpy. But we anticipate generating free cash flow in the fourth quarter. And you will see we'll just continue to build our capacity. I do want to note that we continue to make steps to improve the balance sheet further in the quarter. We're down -- net debt now down to $3 billion. We further reduced maturities in the short end of the maturity schedule, taken out the $900 million '27 notes and issuing $1.75 billion further out. And we continue to be in a great position with a flexible balance sheet to invest in the business, make sure we maintain technology leadership and then return capital to shareholders through dividend and opportunistic buyback.

And our next question comes from the line of Krish Sankar from TD Cowen.

I had 2 questions for Sanjay -- or 2-part question. One is, when you look into HBM4, given the double I/O count through silicon via, what kind of trade ratio should we expect for HBM4? And also, when you look at -- broadly speaking, is there a difference in HBM bits and margin profile between selling to GPU versus ASIC customers?

With respect to HBM4, its trade ratio is greater than 3. For HBM3E, previously, we have shared that trade ratio is approximately 3, and HBM4 has a higher trade ratio than 3. It has a larger die size. And of course, as you noted, it has a higher performance. We shared 60% higher performance given the high-bandwidth interface that this has. And HBM4E will have a ratio that would be even greater. So as we have shared with you in the past that as we are going from HBM3E to 4 to 4E, the trade ratio is going from about 3 towards 4 in that time frame. So of course, this puts -- HBM trade ratio and the growth of HBM absolutely puts a pressure on the non-HBM supply in the industry as well. And with respect to your question on the margin difference for GPU versus ASIC, of course, HBM commands high value, whether it's in GPU accelerators or ASIC-based accelerators. And that value proposition is only growing. When you look ahead over the years, the content with the future generation GPUs or ASIC platforms that will be out there of HBM continues to -- is expected to continue to increase as well. We have shared with you in the past that going from about 200 to 288 gigabytes in GPU accelerators today as well as in the ASIC- based accelerators in that range going to higher levels as we go from 8-high to 12-high capacity. So we don't -- so value proposition is strong, both for GPU accelerators as well as ASIC accelerators. And of course, we don't get into the specifics or differentiating the 2 here.

And our next question comes from the line of Chris Caso from Wolfe Research.

Just a clarification on one of the things you said in the prepared remarks. You talked about there may have been some tariff-related pull-ins by certain customers. I think overall, your comments suggest that you -- at least my interpretation is that you think that the customer inventory levels are getting a bit cleaned up here. Could you clarify the remarks a little bit, put it in context of what you expect that means for customer inventory levels and how that kind of affects your view of bit demand in the second half?

Yes. As we said, customer inventory levels have been healthy overall across our end markets. Some customers may have some level of tariff-related pull-ins. We think the impact of that is relatively modest here, and customers definitely continue to signal a constructive demand environment for the remainder of the calendar year. And of course, the demand trends are driven by strength in AI-driven data center demand, demand coming back in the automotive, industrial, resumption of growth there as well as distribution channels. And as we have discussed, smartphone and PCs, really, as AI penetration increases, the content increase story is there intact for AI smartphones as well as PC. We provided some details in our script there. So we see a constructive demand environment as our customers discuss with us. And again, the effect of the pull-in is relatively modest here. Our growth in Q3 as well as our exceptional record for FQ4 guidance is really driven by Micron's strong execution in the growing market for AI.

And our final question for today comes from the line of Vijay Rakesh from Mizuho.

Just a quick question on the HBM4. Just wondering how the qualification is progressing and if you continue to see that similar power performance leadership that you guys have had on HBM3E. Do you see that continuing on the HBM4 side as well?

So we have provided early units to our customers. We have sampled the products to our multiple customers with HBM4. Really very pleased with the execution and all the specs that we see our HBM delivering, as I mentioned, not only performance, but we plan to continue to focus on that power -- strong power position that we -- which is critically important in AI applications that we have established with our HBM portfolio as well. So of course, the qualifications -- the customer qualifications are ahead of us, and we will be ready to meet customers' demand in 2026 time frame. So HBM in terms of volume ramp is a 2026 product and meeting the time line requirements of customers with their next-generation platforms that will be implementing the HBM4 products. I want to again remind you that the HBM4 uses our well-proven, cost-effective, 1-beta technology node. And of course, it has internal advanced CMOS logic die, internally developed and internally manufactured advanced CMOS logic die, which positions us well as well. And all of our experience of HBM3E ramp-up, we are going from 3E 12-high to HBM3E -- going from -- sorry, going from HBM3E 8-high to HBM3E 12-high, we told you that, that ramp is going extremely well with our yields ahead of our plans, output ahead of our plans as well as yields faster than the ramp that we had experienced in 8-high. All of that gives us confidence and positions us well for HBM4 ramp as well. So we feel very, very good about our overall capabilities to address the HBM4 markets in 2026.

Got it. And on the SSD side, just quickly, with your focus on AI servers, are you seeing an accelerated pull-through on the AI server side for SSDs as well?

So we had mentioned on the data center side in SSDs in late Q4 of calendar '24 as well as early part of calendar '25, there had been some inventory digestion for the data center SSDs given that prior to this period that I just mentioned, there was a very strong demand growth for SSDs. And as we look ahead, we think second half of calendar '25 will be better than the first half of '24 -- I mean, first half of '25, which was impacted by some of that inventory digestion as well. And our data center SSDs are well positioned with some of these recently announced accelerator platforms as well. And that, of course, will be contributing towards the data center SSD future growth as well. We are very pleased with our record data center SSD share as achieved in CQ1 per the third-party reports. And we are now a clear #2 brand in terms of market share at the end of CQ1. So we plan to continue to leverage our SSD portfolio to continue to focus on shifting the mix of the products towards higher-value parts of the NAND market.

This does conclude the question-and-answer session as well as today's program. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for your participation. You may now disconnect. Good day.