Welcome and thank you all for standing by. At this time all participants are in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions]. Today's call is being recorded. If you have any objection, you may disconnect at this point. I'll now turn the meeting over to Ms. Martie Zakas. Ma'am, you may begin.

Good morning, everyone. Welcome to Mueller Water Products' 2016 First Quarter Conference Call. We issued our press release reporting results of operations for the quarter ended December 31, 2015 yesterday afternoon. A copy of it is available on our website muellerwaterproducts.com. Discussing the first quarter's results this morning are Greg Hyland, our Chairman, President and CEO; and Evan Hart, our CFO. This morning's call is being recorded and webcast live on the Internet. We have also posted slides on our website to help illustrate the quarter's results as well as to address forward-looking statements and our non-GAAP disclosure requirements. At this time please refer to Slide two. This slide identifies certain non-GAAP financial measures referenced in our press release, on our slides and on this call and discloses the reasons why we believe that these measures provide useful information to investors. Reconciliations between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures are included in the supplemental information within our press release and on our website. Slide 3 addresses our forward-looking statements made on this call. This slide includes cautionary information identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those included in forward-looking statements, as well as specific examples of forward-looking statements. Please review Slides 2 and 3 in their entirety. During this call, all references to a specific year or quarter, unless specified otherwise, refer to our fiscal year. Our fiscal year ends on September 30. A replay of this morning's call will be available for 30 days after the call at 1-800-756-6991. The archived webcast and corresponding slides will be available for at least 90 days in the Investor Relations section of our website. In addition, we will furnish a copy of our prepared remarks on Form 8-K later this morning. After the prepared remarks we will open the call to questions. I'll now turn the call over to Greg.

Thanks, Martie. Thanks for joining us today as we discuss our results for the 2016 first quarter. I'll begin with a brief overview followed by Evan's more detailed financial report. I will then provide additional color on the quarter's results and developments in our end markets, as well as our outlook for the 2016 second quarter. We saw strong growth in sales of Mueller Company's core products and continued improvement in its operating performance. Domestic net sales of Mueller Company's valves, hydrants and brass products increased 9.2% year-over-year in the first quarter. Mueller Company's adjusted operating income increased 17.1%, or 250 basis points, and its adjusted EBITDA margin improved to 22.4%. Anvil's net sales for the first quarter decreased $17.5 million year-over-year to $79.6 million, primarily due to lower shipment volumes to the oil and gas markets, as we expected. While the downturn in the oil and gas markets has not yet abated, we believe year-over-year comparisons should ease through the balance of 2016. Net sales and adjusted operating income for Mueller Technologies were each slightly lower year-over-year. However, backlog and projects awarded at both Mueller Systems and Echologics are up substantially. Mueller Technologies' focus remains on accelerating growth of its higher-margin AMI and leak detection technologies, and improving operating performance over the course of the year. We continue to expect growth in demand for our products in our addressed water markets in 2016 driven by both municipal and residential construction spending. Adjusted net income per share for the quarter was $0.04 versus $0.03 a year ago, and we believe we are on track to meet our expectations for the full year. With that, I'll turn the call over to Evan.

Thanks, Greg, and good morning, everyone. I'll first review our first quarter consolidated financial results and then discuss segment performance. Net sales for the 2016 first quarter of $242.7 million decreased $19.1 million, or 7.3%, from 2015 first quarter net sales of $261.8 million, due primarily to lower shipment volumes at Anvil, the divestiture of our Canadian municipal castings business in December 2014 and unfavorable Canadian currency exchange rates. Gross profit was $68.7 million for the 2016 first quarter compared with $71.3 million for the 2015 first quarter. Gross margin increased 110 basis points to 28.3% in the 2016 first quarter from 27.2 % in the 2015 first quarter. Selling, general and administrative expenses were lower year-over-year, due primarily to personnel related expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were $53 million in the 2016 first quarter, compared with $55 million in the 2015 first quarter. Adjusted operating income for the 2016 first quarter decreased $600,000 to $15.7 million as compared with $16.3 million for the 2015 first quarter. Although Mueller Company improved its results by $3.5 million, or 17.1%, this improvement was more than offset by a decline of $3.5 million at Anvil and $400,000 at Mueller Technologies. Adjusted EBITDA for the 2016 first quarter decreased to $28.7 million compared with $30.6 million for the 2015 first quarter. We again experienced lower interest expense this quarter, down $3.3 million from last year. We benefited this quarter due to lower interest rates and lower amounts of debt outstanding following the refinancing we completed in November 2014. Interest expense, net for the 2016 first quarter declined to $6.1 million, as compared with $9.4 million for the 2015 first quarter. Income tax expense for the 2016 first quarter of $2.6 million was 29.5% of income before income taxes, and included a benefit of…

Thanks, Evan. I'll now provide summary comments on our 2016 first quarter results and end markets, and provide an overview of our expectations and outlook for the second quarter and full year. I will begin with Mueller Company. We were pleased with the 9.2% growth in domestic sales of valves, hydrants and brass products, which was driven by both residential construction and municipal spending. As we noted, net sales of Henry Pratt's water treatment valves declined in the quarter. A substantial portion of this business can be choppy, depending on the timing of projects in its backlog. As you may recall, we pointed out on our last call that sales of Henry Pratt's water treatment valves were very strong in the 2015 fourth quarter and we expected to see a drop off, both sequentially and year-over-year, in the 2016 first quarter. Mueller Company's net sales during the first quarter were also impacted by unfavorable changes in Canadian currency exchange rates. We will also remind you that starting with our 2016 second quarter, we will no longer have a negative comparison due to the divestiture of our Canadian municipal castings business since that transaction closed in December 2014. Mueller Company again delivered impressive operating performance. Higher shipment volumes, a favorable mix of higher-margin products, lower raw material costs and improved operating efficiencies helped drive a 250 basis points improvement in adjusted operating margin. Looking at our latest 12 months, Mueller Company's adjusted EBITDA margin was 26.5%, a 190 basis points improvement from the prior trailing 12-month period. Turning now to Anvil. As expected, sales into the oil and gas markets declined approximately 65% in the first quarter. Anvil's sales into these markets have generally correlated with rig counts, which were also down approximately 65% year-over-year in the first quarter. Overall, Anvil's…

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. And your first question comes from the line of Mike Wood from Macquarie Security Group. Your line is now open.

Hi, good morning. Just hoping you can confirm what you said about that price increase in February. Was that, the 7% and 12% price increase, is that for 2016 and are you implying that the pre-buy would be a negative impact because it will be less than the pre-buy that occurred last year?

Mike, it’s 7% on valves and hydrants effective February 12th and 10% in Canada effective February 1st. Actually what we’re implying is we think that we’ll probably see about the same order dollar value that we saw last year. And our expectation is that the distributors will generally not want to at least knowingly carry higher inventory levels than they did at the end of the second quarter last year entering the construction season. As we said in our prepared remarks, we saw a significant year-over-year increase in the bookings ahead of our price increase last year. So when we look at it, we think it's probably unreasonable for us to expect that they would even have a -- bring in sales or bring in valves and hydrants that would give them a higher level of inventory. We think what they have last year probably is what the max that they want to have entering the construction season. So that’s why we said that when we look at valves and hydrants for our shipments for the second quarter domestically, we’re seeing that into the low to mid single-digits. But as we also said, we believe that in our outlook that we believe our distributors will be able to -- will turn that inventory a lot quicker this year because last year a number of them were impacted by the heavy rains in May and June that certainly curtailed construction activity.

Okay. And just the guidance for the next quarter of up slightly, Mueller Co., that's less than what you had said for the full year, mid-single digits. I'm just trying to understand what causes the quarter to be at a lower run rate than your full year?

The causes the lower run rate certainly is we think that we’re not going to ship a whole lot more in the second quarter this year than what we did last year because of the significant pull forward that we saw last year. We accept a similar pull forward this year. However, when we get to the second half of the year; one, we think there is stronger market growth than we have last year; two, if you take into account the impact of the rain as I mentioned and the curtailment construction activity, that inventory is going to turn a lot quicker and we’re going to replace that inventory in the third and fourth quarter. So in essence we’re saying that, hey, if you look at what we shipped last year and we’re shipping what was in the second quarter. We’re shipping this and going into inventory because in most parts of the country there is not a lot of construction activity. That we’re shipping probably just about max that distributors who want to carry going into the construction period. We just think that’s going to turn a whole lot quicker this year than it did last year.

And you had the favorable comps against the destock as well, I guess.

Yes, we think, yes.

The other question, now it looks like you're on a forward basis here under 2 times net leverage. I've got to imagine, just given your muni more stable business exposure you can add at least another turn of debt, maybe $200 million or more. I'm just curious what your views are in terms of your urgency of deploying that capital? How ripe is your pipeline and if you're more likely to invest in technology businesses or more traditional businesses?

Great question as you point out our net debt leverage is down to 2 times plus given our outlook and our expectations for the business we expect to see greater cash flow generation this year than what we did last year. I think if we see an acquisition that’s a good strategic fit we would certainly evaluate it. We are particularly interested in expanding in water infrastructure, both I think in terms of the breadth and depth of products and services. And we would look at emerging technologies also. So right now, I couldn’t say, hey, we would rather do it in more traditional products, we'd rather do it in our emerging technologies. It all depends on the opportunity. We’ve said that we probably think it's unlikely that we could add to our gate valve and our hydrant product line, but we have the opportunity to add for our valves product line to give us a broader product line going into water treatment we think that that’s certainly an opportunity. On the other hand, if we see an opportunity that makes sense on leak detection and/or on our AMI technology, I think that will be something that we would consider or take a very close look at. And then we have other options. We’ve always said in the past calls that our first alternative is to find ways to grow the business. If we find an acquisition that just -- we don’t have acquisition opportunities that are value enhancing for our shareholders, then we’ll look at other options for the cash that we’re generating. But certainly with our current net debt leverage and given the cash flow that we expect to generate in this fiscal year we have a lot more flexibility.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Kevin Maczka from BB&T Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Greg, a couple questions on tech. I guess with the news the other day that the American Water contract went to a competitor, can you just address that? I think that may have been an AMR product that you were de-emphasizing anyway. It's lower margin than your AMI. I'm just wondering, was that all contemplated in your initial guidance? Was that a surprise or was that an intentional de-emphasizing of a product?

Yes, thanks, Kevin. As you pointed out over the past three years Mueller Systems has provided meters and what we refer to and American Water refers to as meter interface units or radios. And over the last two years that's been on average about $26 million in revenues for Mueller Systems. That breaks down roughly about 55% of those revenues were in meters, about 45% of those in radios. Since August of 2015 American Water has been engaged in a new RFP process for the next three years. This is our understanding of the status RFP based on information we receive directly from American Water. First American Water informed us that it is its intent to know longer purchase integrated meter and radio units. It appears that American Water is positioning to sell -- and it's positioning its metering and infrastructure so it has the ability to migrate over time from lower functionality AMR or drive by radio communication through two-way AMI functionality in the most cost effective manner. Second we understand American Water has awarded the meter portion of the new RFP. We understand several meter manufactures will provide meters to American Water going forward. But we will not be providing American Water with meters going forward other than our remote disconnect meters. We decided not to chase the meter portion of the new contract. As we've discussed on previous calls and as we have pointed out, we are focusing on growing our meter interface business primarily our more profitable AMI business. We've seen a clear uptick in our AMI business over the past few months and given a limited production capacity we want to focus on the portfolio of products that is most important to the future of the industry. Which brings me to the third point. Our…

Got it. I appreciate all that additional detail. Just a couple of follow-ups on what you just said, Greg. The first half in Mueller Tech, sales are going to be down, but you still feel like you have good visibility with your backlog and shipment timing such that the full year can be plus 10% to 15%? Because, again, after a negative first half, it seems like a pretty high bar.

Yes. As we figure today, at Mueller Systems our backlog is up about 58% on our AMI and as we've said today that given the schedules of those projects and we’ve mentioned on a number of times on our previous calls that they can flip. They can flip a couple of months with movement from one quarter to the next quarter or from one fiscal year to the next fiscal year. And as we look at that backlog today, the schedule of that backlog, that gives us our confidence of being able to see the 10% to 15% uptick of the increase that we recognized. And that’s what the mix really drives the $7 million to $10 million margin, operating income improvement. So yes, we recognize the hurdle that it potentially creates, but as we look at our backlog the projects that we continue to close as we sit here today, so we think we can offset -- not only offset the loss of the meter portion of American Water but also grow our overall revenues.

Got it. Just one last one from me on this topic. Well I guess first, you said 58% increase in your backlog? And second, you just addressed -- you mentioned introducing the longer-range radios.

Yes.

Where are you in your product development effort there on the AMI side? Are you to the point where you feel like you have a best-in-class product offering? Is that why you're winning more business and showing this big backlog growth?

We do. We think the utility has -- they'll have a decision, whether or not that, based on their topography and so on, if they go to what we'll say a fixed network that is the receivers, the radios are perhaps mounted on towers or on the communication towers or the water towers. In that case, there's other technology we think is better than ours. However, in a number of applications that we think the mesh technology is the better choice. Today, we think we have the best choice both for large and small utilities. What's important is, some of our wins recently have come from smaller utilities where our previous technology was just too costly. The infrastructure was too complex. We needed much larger infrastructure than what we do today. So, yes, we introduced that in June last year, and I think that's what's contributed in the July, August and September time frame to our winning of orders and our building of backlog. So we think, as we sit here today, we do have a technology that puts us in a much stronger competitive position in the AMI market. We've also worked on this technology and, what I referenced in our prepared remarks is that, we see utilities that maybe are not quite ready to make the full scale investment in AMI, but are looking to position themselves to make an easier transition. And we're calling that an almost AMI-light type of radio that would act -- that in the short term, that would have the same functionality as an AMR radio, but then could be moved to AMI. So, yes, we think that over the last couple years as we've learned more about the technology, we've made some investments in the R&D side. We've talked in the last, on our last call or last several calls, the LoRa technology has made this available -- made this possible and we think we're a lot better positioned today than we were certainly at this time a year ago.

Great. Thanks for all detail.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Seth Weber from RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

First question is a big picture question, Greg. I'm wondering if you heard anything on the municipal front, as far as fallout related to the Flint, Michigan situation? Whether you've heard anything about municipalities either delaying projects, reallocating CapEx or if there's anything that you've been hearing through your checks?

Thanks, Seth, good question. We look at it both in the short term and intermediate term. On the short term we haven’t heard too much of having a material impact on utility plans. That being said, we think some utilities could switch maybe some projects that were planned to other projects. So generally, in our discussions with our end users in the water utilities once they have their budget approved and they’re in the middle of that cycle right now, they want to spend that money. So we do expect that they could in some cases decide, hey, until they learn a little more, they may postpone one project but we expect that they will put that money into another project in upgrading their infrastructure. On a more intermediate term, we think that in situations like the one at Flint, it just gets the media attention and it gives greater visibility to the deteriorating condition of water infrastructure around the country. We have quoted in the past that the EPA estimates a $384 billion of additional investment in drinking water infrastructure is needed through 2030. So we believe these types of events or catalysts will increase spending as the public becomes more aware of the issues. In fact we talked more specifically about Flint about six months ago. They contacted our Echologics group to come in and do pro forma condition assessments on a certain pipe in their system. So I think relative in the short term we don’t expect to see a material impact as we've had discussions with other, that's not to say that we may see a project here and there that's delayed. And again I think that most of the response has been, hey, our budgets are approved. We may shift it from one project to the next, as they learn a little more. So in the short term, we think very little, in the long term we think just making the issues aware to the public is going to make I think funding that much more readily available.

That makes sense. Thank you. And then I guess just more specifically on the business, on Anvil in particular, so you reaffirmed their outlook for the year. You're starting in a pretty deep hole here. I'm just wondering, what you see? It sounds like you're kind of expecting a pretty big hockey stick here in the back half of the year. I recognize comps get easier on the oil and gas side, but are you expecting the fire protection business or industrial or maybe just give us some color where you think the strength comes from outside of oil and gas?

Yes. When we look at the second quarter and we've always -- we talked about our business, about 10% of our business historically has come from a product area of engineered, we called our engineered pipe supports or engineered hangars. We were awarded last year a nuclear plant it's being built in Thailand. We were awarded those engineered pipe supports, we will be shipping that in the second quarter. So that certainly helps us make up a little bit of what we saw in the down fall in oil and gas. Secondly when we look at the first quarter, our fire protection orders or revenue was up about 5% year-over-year -- I said Thailand it's Taiwan, sorry. But as I said our fire protection revenues were up about 5% year-over-year. However, we were disappointed because we saw our mechanical actually down and some of that or most of that was because we saw a fall off in the industrial segment, which we think it was affected still by oil and gas. So we think general industry in the U.S. those tentacles go deep on the oil and gas market and does impact manufacturing in a lot of areas and we saw a downturn in industrial spending. So as we look at the second quarter and then the impact the rest of them have certainly we think the project of Taiwan helps make up some of that downfall. We do see positive momentum on the fire protection side, I would say right here as we sit here today, still some questions on how much impact on the mechanical side. So we look at those all -- all those factors right now, we feel comfortable and I think a big help will be when we get to the second half of the year, the comparisons to do become easier and we don’t expect to see anywhere near the drop off as our drop off in the oil and gas. But I would -- when we look at the field -- at the full year the forecast for Anvil, what has changed that our expectations or the guidance we gave is are we going to see a continued fall off in our industrial side or our mechanical business, and right now I think that's a question mark.

Thank you. If I could just ask one other quick one. On the technology business, it sounds like you should end the year at about a low $30 million run rate for revenue, maybe a little higher. Would you expect to be profitable at that revenue level?

I'm sorry. Seth, would you repeat that. Are you talking about for the quarter the $30 million?

Yes, your kind of run rate coming out of the fourth quarter for the technologies businesses.

Obviously it will always be lumpy depending on what percent of our revenue comes from AMI. The $30 million level especially with what we expect in AMI that would be a profitable -- that business to be profitable.

Okay. Terrific. Thank you very much.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line [Indiscernible] from D.A. Davidson. Your line is now open.

I've just got a quick question here. On the treatment of valve products, really, how do we think about the impact to margins from lower sales this quarter? Did it really help you guys out in the margin front?

I am sorry, I wonder if you could maybe just speak a little bit louder and repeat the question.

Basically did the lower sales numbers help you out on the margin front, on segment margins?

For Mueller Co.?

Yes.

Actually what helped us out there is we had our Pratt, as we talked about our Pratt business which is our treatment valves it was down year-over-year. That certainly is a lower margin product than our valves and hydrants and our valves and hydrants had nice 9% growth. So that is a much richer mix for us. We'll have much higher conversion margins when we have a stronger mix of our valves and hydrants. So that certainly was one of the drivers for our improved year-over-year performance. As well as, just some of the -- our efficiencies and our manufacturing improvements that we always focus on, as well as overall lower raw material costs.

And also just one quick one here. Really for Mueller Co., what portion of the product portfolio are you seeing favorable price-cost tailwinds?

Well, we’re certainly seeing favorable price cost tailwinds on our valves and hydrants and our brass products, and I would say that certainly when we look at our water treatment -- our water treatment products, those sometimes can be large projects that go out for quotation and the pricing can vary project by project. We’re seeing positives there in that business also from lower raw material costs. But depending on the project, we may not see as much benefit from pricing.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Walter Liptak from Seaport Global. Your line is now open.

Good morning. I wanted to ask about the oil and gas business now that you got more than a year of declines under your belt. If you could size the business for us, how much is it down now kind of on a 12-month basis? And maybe talk about cost reduction, too? [Is it a very high] breakeven level for it, et cetera?

Well, let me go a little bit in history, if we look back in 2014 it was about 7% of total Mueller Water Products sales or about $80 million. We look at our fiscal year '15 that was down to 4% of our sales or about $50 million. So we saw about $30 million decline in '15 over '14. Certainly we talked about the decline we saw at Anvil this year, that was another -- I mean this quarter about $12 million, I am rounding that, around $12 million. And we expect another further decline at Anvil in the fourth quarter. So if you look at 2014 when that market was stable and where it's running today, it's down from probably about on an annual basis $80 million to about $35 million and so it's obviously down substantially. If this market is at least on a year-over-year basis stable for the second half of the year, we should be around that level of sales on an annualized basis. We have been taking cost reduction throughout the last several quarters. Our headcount in Anvil in total is down over 11% from a year ago but most of that headcount has come out of our oil and gas related businesses, about 50% to 60% headcount in our manufacturing facilities, in those facilities that manufacture oil and gas related products. When we look at the SG&A, especially on the selling side, we have a very small sales force that focuses on this product, I’d say four or five sales people. We really don’t want to touch those. We still think that it's important to maintain relationships because history has told us when this market comes back, it comes back very quickly. And we want to maintain those relationships. I would say any further manufacturing activity, let me say any reduction in cost on the manufacturing side would be -- we would have to close our combined factories. And right now and I think I said this on one of our previous calls, the only option for us right now will be move that factory -- those factories from Texas up to the North East and that doesn’t make sense to manufacture oil and gas products in the North East. But I’d say right now that we’ve probably taken most of the cost reduction actions that we can.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Joe Giordano from Cowen and Company. Your line is now open.

Hey guys this is Tristan for Joe this morning. I believe this is the second quarter in a row that we don't see any buybacks. Is there any reason for this?

When we -- you point out we did not purchase shares, we still have remaining board authorization for about $45 million of share repurchases. At this point we have not implemented a formulaic repurchasing plan, rather we are approaching it quarter-by-quarter as we consider all capital allocation options. But we are evaluating if we should put in place a 10b5-1 plan and if we do so we will disclose that when we do so.

Perfect. Thank you, guys.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Seth Weber from RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Hi. Sorry. Just a quick follow-up for Evan. Is it possible to give us the impact from currency to both revenue and operating income?

Yes. Seth, it's really related to Canadian currency and on the revenue side it's roughly about $2 million in the quarter and just a little over $0.5 million on the operating income side.

Perfect. Thank you, Eric.

Well I see we've gone about an hour so we will end the call. We are available in our offices as always for any additional questions. So again thanks for your interest in Mueller Water Products.

Thank you, speakers. That concludes today's conference. Thank you all for participating. And you may now disconnect.