Martie Zakas
Chief Executive Officer
Very good question, certainly. And I think overall, we do have, as we all know, was passed a few years back. And I think importantly, that bill had bipartisan support. And in and around aging infrastructure and in and around specifically, water. I think just the growing awareness challenges that a number of cities have faced, you know, continues to emphasize the importance of the investment with respect to that. You know, the gap has been there. The gap is widening. And so I think that certainly does lend support for the continued need. On top of that, I know the lead service line replacements again, I think it continues to be an area where there is at least near-term focus and that's largely because consumers and communities really appreciate the health risk associated with that. You know, I think given the new administration and certainly given a number of the policy changes, certainly a great question to ask. I think our belief is that overall that municipal can will continue to be resilient. As you know, we have not our guidance doesn't assume a meaningful impact. From the infrastructure bill funding, we are continuing to watch it. I know Paul shared earlier on a call today that as we look at the number of projects and the, you know, documentation and support they're seeking around this. So I think you know, is there a near-term impact? Hard to tell if there will be, but as I said, we don't have any specific infrastructure spending. And I think when you assess the bipartisan support, as well as the need due to the impact on water and, importantly, health risk, I think, that even if there are a few short-term bumps, over the longer term, we think this will still be an area where we will see investment.