Hello everyone. Thank you for standing by and welcome to Neonode’s Fourth Quarter 2013 Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions) Thank you. At this time for opening remarks and introductions, I would like to turn the call over to Daniel Gelbtuch, our Senior Vice President of Corporate Finance and Investor Relations. Daniel, please go ahead and start the conference.

Thank you. Welcome and thank you for joining us. On today’s call, we will review our fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2013 financial results and provide a corporate update. Our update will include details of our design wins, technology developments and new customer agreement that we recently announced. The prepared remarks will be provided by Thomas Eriksson, our CEO and David Brunton, our CFO. Before turning the call over to Thomas and David, I would like to make the following remarks concerning forward-looking statements. All statements in this conference call other than historical facts are forward-looking statements. The words anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, tend, will, guide, confidence, targets, projects and other similar expressions typically are used to identify forward-looking statements. These forward statements do not guarantee the future performance that may involve or subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that may affect Neonode’s business, financial position and other operating results, which include, but are not limited to the risk factors and other qualifications contained in Neonode’s annual report on 10-K, quarterly reports on 10-Q and other reports filed by Neonode with the SEC to which your attention is directed. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expected or implied by these forward-looking statements. Neonode expressly disclaims any intent or obligation to update these forward-looking statements. At this time it’s now my pleasure to turn the call over to Thomas Eriksson, Chief Executive Officer of Neonode. Thomas, please go ahead.

Thank you, Daniel. Good morning everyone and welcome to the call. To start with, I’m very pleased to announce that we just received Microsoft Windows 8 touch certification for our new zForce Plus technology. This major milestone for Neonode has ultimate [club gates] for several mutual updates from Tier One PC OEMs admitted to integrate our solutions into Windows 8 ultrabooks, monitors, all-in-one computers and different PC accessories. With our solutions’ high performance low cost and easy high-yield manufacturing, we expect to garner incremental Tier One licensees and wins in the near-term. Moreover, we still expect to generate revenues from the PC segment this year with an accelerating ground occurring in 2015. One of the key markets for Neonode is automotive segment also development of product cycles is much longer than consumer electronics applications. Once traction is received, the revenues are linear consistent and long-term. Neonode is working with all major OEMs and ODMs in the automotive sector with success that was [envisioned] in the coming year. Neonode’s technology is currently being showcased on the industry leading entertainment system at the Geneva Multi Show. This implementation also proves the diversity and quality of Neonode’s zForce technology as automotive compliance and testing on among the most stringent and demanding of any testing requirements today in any industry. Our fourth quarter GAAP revenue of $1 million excluded approximately $713,000 of revenue due to our new revenue recognition policy, which recognized revenues on customer reporting rather than on earnings period. Our soft comparisons were due to the weak e-reader market, as retail ASPs are still well above $100, which is increasingly uncompetitive relative to color tablets. However, on the positive side, we signed a new contract with a major Tier One eReader OEM, so hopefully starting second half should help us recapture the…

Thanks Thomas. Earlier today we released our fourth quarter and year ended December 31, 2013 financial results press release and filed our annual report on Form 10-K. Both of these are available for download from the investors section of our website at neonode.com. For the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2013 revenues decreased 57% to $1 million compared to $2.3 million for the same period in 2012. Our revenues for the three months ended December 31, 2013 included $867,000 from license fees plus $142,000 of non-recurring engineering or NRE fees compared to $2.2 million of license fees plus $160,000 of NRE fees for the same quarter in 2012. One of the reasons for the decrease is that in the fourth quarter 2013, we determined that it's appropriate to recognize licensing revenues in the period in which customer royalty reports are received rather than in the period in which the products are distributed or to which the license fee relates. The effect of this chain is that $713,000 of licensing fees will be recognized in revenue in the first quarter of 2014 rather than in Q4 of 2013. On a full year basis, revenue were $3.7 million a 48% decrease from $7.1 million for 2012. For 2013 78% or $2.9 million of our revenue was generated by licensing fees, compared to 87% or $6.2 million in 2012, while remaining revenue for both periods was related to engineering fees. On a previous call, we discussed that in the fourth quarter of 2012, Amazon discontinued shipping its (inaudible) that used our touch technology. Amazon accounted for 32% of our revenue or $2.2 million in 2012. We also previously discussed that in 2013, several new customers such as Leapfrog, Volvo and Oregon Scientific began shipping products in markets other than new leaders. The license…

Thanks very much, David. To recap Neonode continued to gain momentum and visibility in the market that will allow the company to further accelerate growth in 2014 and beyond. We are not only securing new design wins, but we are aggressively investing in our business to meet our customers demand and to remain in the leading edge of touch and proximity solutions. I would not take this opportunity to thank all our customers, partners, investors and our very talented and dedicated employees for the trust and support. This concludes the prepared remarks and I will open the call for questions. Thank you very much.

Great. Congratulations on the Windows 8 certification.

Thanks.

Thomas, now that you have certification and you mentioned in your press release and prepared remarks that you have projects underway, what’s left to do in terms of getting PC products to market? And do you have a sense of when we might see the first ones reaching the channels?

Rob, this is Daniel. The technologies obviously going to always be improved and tweaked and we’re adding features to it like our native proximity sensing features and stuff like that. But as it stands right now, the technology is ready and we’re working with Tier One OEMs, multiple Tier One OEMs on hopefully many projects. So right now, we’re in a very sensitive stage of (inaudible) the many different opportunities (inaudible) know in the very near term exactly what we’re going to be working on. And we still believe that we will have PC related revenues within the next 12 months to18 months. So, hopefully within that period of time we should have PC revenues.

So, it’s too soon to tell whether it’s this year potentially?

Again, we hope to have PC revenues very soon. It’s certainly possible; we’re going to have to figure that out over the next few weeks.

Okay. And then just a point of clarification, you mentioned the first printer model is in production, more to come and you also described a new contract win for a low cost printer. Is that with the same customer or a different customer?

It’s with the same customer. Yes, as we mentioned, we’re at the latter stages or our customer at the latter stages of pre-inventory -- pre-launch build and things are going very well. And we hope to have and we hope to see products on the shelves in the very near term. And these new wins which are at -- particularly at the lower end of their business line are very good validation for our technology at even lower costs to show that -- demonstrate that we can even replace [buttons] at this point and in a very cost effective way.

Okay. My final question has to do with the smartphone cases; you mentioned demonstrating that recently at Mobile World Congress. I guess one of the hurdles is developing applications that would take advantage of that technology. Can you provide any color on potential partnerships there or maybe a case could be bundled with an app? Thanks.

Yes. We’re talking to several game companies for using this as a platform but this iPhone case is really to showcase our single side sensor which we really today calls zForce [air] that means you can touch enable any surface. So this is one application really to showcase what we can do with the technology. It’s not the product we develop, in fact it’s a reference design that case manufacturers can take at starting point of their design and use our technology. So, it’s a complete reference design we have developed together with Texas Instruments.

Just to add to that along those lines, there are number of case manufacturers for both tablets and for smartphone; it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s just for a smartphone, there is some tablet case manufacturers that are interested in a purely as a [mouse type] function which doesn’t really exist, a virtual [mouse type] function. So the killer apps are still, some of them already exist in theory on the [mouse] side for a tablet but again we’re working with some software application developers to create more killer apps for.

Great, thanks guys. I’ll jump back in the queue.

Our next question comes from the line of Mike Malouf with Craig-Hallum Capital.

Great, thanks for taking my questions. And let me give you my congratulations on Windows 8. That’s a big hurdle, and that’s great.

Thank you.

My question is, if you could give us a little bit of clarity on your competitive position within Windows 8. When you talked to OEMs, it sounds like you’ve talked with them pretty extensively over the recent period. What kind of difference with regard to a bill-of-materials are you offering up an OEM versus what they can get from either the ITO, traditional ITO or the new emerging metal-mesh providers?

So, Mike it’s an excellent question. But as you can imagine right now, we’re in very extensive negotiations and discussions with our customers. So we really can’t give you a precise bill-of-material. But what I will say is that from what we understand the cost for traditional ITO is right now in the $30 range, the metal-mesh guys are in the $20 to $30 or even higher. And we are considerably below that level or fraction of that level.

Great. And…

And on other note, just to add to that as our light guys improve, as LED prices continue to reduce, and as our controller continues to evolve, our internal costs will continue to go down, excuse me, not our internal, the system cost for our solution, total system costs continue to decline. So we have a very good path for consistent cost reductions going forward going forward.

Great. And those cost reductions would go directly to the OEM and your license would remain hopefully static over that time?

Absolutely, that’s exactly. We move in the same direction or at the same interest for our customers. So they benefit a 100% from the system cost reduction.

Great. And then I’m wondering, as you have gone through this Windows 8 certification, have you been able to seeing any performance difference from the usability standpoint? I mean is the customer going to know whether or not this is a Neonode touch sensor or a traditional ITO? Is it going to act different, is it going to be either slower or faster or better at some things or worse at some things?

The technology optical that means [Technical difficulty]

Hello?

(Operator Instructions). Our next question comes from the line of (inaudible).

Hello, can you hear me? Hello? I guess not. Hello? [Technical difficulty]

Ladies and gentlemen, this is the operator, I apologize that there will be a slight delay in today’s conference. Please hold and the conference will resume momentarily. Thank you for your patience. You may proceed.

Yes, sorry about that. Mike, can you hear me? Hello, is Mike Malouf there?

Can you hear me?

Yes, sorry about that. There was some technical difficulty, our line dropped. Can you ask that question again? You were asking about, excuse me, performance difference.

Yes, my question was, let me just rephrase it or start over is, as you look on the usability of your technology versus the traditional ITO or the metal-mesh technology, is there any difference in how a customer, an end customer would perceive using a Neonode test sensor versus some of the others? I mean is faster or slower, or does it do better at some things than others, trying to get a sense of in the -- when someone’s at the retailer, will they either, is there a difference on a choice there? Thanks.

Hello. Yes. First of all, the technology is optical; it means that there is no need for any conductive object like the [positive] touch. So, in fact you could use a nail or finger or any object to control touch screen, so also plastic pen and other objects. So, it’s going to be a feeling of a very smooth operation and also the touch screen in some situation can be very fast. So, for one or two finger tracking, we’re looking at 200 or 300 frames per second, which is quite much better than competing solutions today.

Great. And then just a couple of follow-up questions, when you talk to the license of the OEMs; and obviously touch has been pretty low penetration so far versus expectation, are you getting any kind of feedback from these OEMs on how many devices that they would like to roll touch out to over the next couple of years?

Well, they don’t give us exact numbers, but again they are very much focused on getting this out as soon as possible and trying to get it across everything that’s Windows 8 provided that the cost and the yield and the easability or the pragmatic -- or the way of making it easily is -- it’s all pragmatic. If it makes sense, they want to have it across their product lines. So, again there are a number of estimates out there, which I think are very much predicated on ITO still being dominant or being the only solution, but now that there is an alternative, I think that dramatically or should dramatically change the landscape over the next 2 years. Again, if we have a cost effective product that’s easily manufactured at a high-yield, there is no reason why they wouldn’t use it across all product line.

Great, thanks a lot. I appreciate it.

Your next question comes from the line of [Nick Celentano] with Wavelength Asset Management.

My question was just asked and answered.

Your next question comes from the line of (inaudible).

Do you hear me now?

Yes.

Okay. First, I missed part of the call. Did you provide any financial guidance in terms of revenues, net income or cash flows for the year?

No, we do not provide guidance at this point. As you can understand right now, we’re in a very interesting period where we have initial ramps of new markets like printers and children’s tablets and of course PC is coming right into the fray right now, and we’re going to probably have much better understanding of that over the next few weeks. And so therefore visibility is very much something that we can’t predict and we’re just not giving guidance at this point.

All right understood. And then a separate question about the non-recurring engineering development costs. When I compare the 10-K and the 10-Q, looks like you divided the total payments made in 2013 under the TI agreement from 304,000 to 270,000 and I’m trying to understand what caused the revision?

Yes. So, can you just repeat that? I didn’t understand exactly what you’re asking.

Yes. In the 10-K you have a section on the non-recurring engineering development costs and in that section it says that the payments for 2013, the total payments under that agreement were 270,000, but in the September 10-Q, the number was 344,000, so I am wondering what happened there, why was the number revised down?

That’s a good question, but we’ll have to take this offline and we’ll try to get back and answer for you. But again remember that those non-recurring engineering payments go to TI that is for development of the controller chip. And again I will try to reconcile that, hold on a second. Here is Dave Brunton our CFO.

Yes. The difference is that at Q3 we included the [VAT] tax because the pay down of our subsidiary in Sweden and there is VAT included. And at year-end when we went through the audit, we determined that the VAT which is 25% in Sweden we should not have included the VAT tax because that goes to the government not to TI.

Understood. So basically when I look at this number right now, so this 270,000 I should be able to imply the number of chips by simply using the numbers in the agreement like the number of A6 that have been shipped?

You’re asking about -- paid in cash, right? So there is also some -- there is a table on the book. So yes, but you are right. There is a group at $0.05 and a group at $0.08. So you have to do math. But yes…

Right. So the expense basically, the expense is net of value-added, that’s right, the expense is a clear number.

270 is, the 344 was not.

Right. But the expense not the payment, the expense for the year is clear number. Okay. That’s it from me.

(Operator instructions) Your next question comes from the line of Mike Adams with Millennium Partners.

Yes. Hi, how are you? Can you comment on the 879 patent first?

Yes. Again, I wish I could. Right now, it’s something that we are obviously working on very diligently and it’s something that’s in a very sensitive state. As you have seen in our prepare remarks, the (inaudible) that we have across the Board went up to about 31 patents issued, I think it’s 87 that are pending, which is a considerable jump. And what’s in those 31, a number of them are actually UI related, they strength in dramatically our UI base. And again, we are working diligently on the monetization part. But at this point we cannot comment, it’s a very sensitive subject at this point.

Right. Anything, when do you think we’ll hear something about that?

Well, I hope as soon as I can -- a number -- the options here are I guess are fourfold, either we could do nothing with them for a variety of reasons or we could theoretically sell them or we can partner up with a [tool] or we could theoretically if we lost our minds, we could try to sue by ourselves. But, so you can imagine we have a number of options, again we are not shirking our responsibilities in terms of looking for the best options. And we are trying to figure out; we’re at the latter stage to figuring out the latter stages of figuring out which one is the best option of the four, really the three.

So, you think we'll hear something on the next call?

I hope so, but I can't give you that level of guidance. That's something that we're working on. But again that's a very sensitive subject.

Thank you.

And there are no further questions at this time. Are there any closing comments?

Yes.

Yes. We want to thank you all for joining us on the call. We will keep you posted on our progress in 2014 and in the future. Have a very good day and thank you everyone.