Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the North American Construction Group Ltd. Fourth Quarter and Year Ended Results Conference Call and Webcast on Thursday, February 16, 2023. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Following the management’s prepared remarks, there will be an opportunity for analysts, shareholders and bondholders to ask questions. The media may monitor this call in listen-only mode. They are free to quote any members of management, but they are asked not to quote remarks from any other participants without the participant’s permission. The company wishes to confirm that today’s comments contain forward-looking information and that actual results could differ materially from a conclusion, forecast or projection contained in that forward-looking information. Certain material factors or assumptions were applied in drawing conclusions or in making forecasts or predictions that are reflected in the forward-looking information. Additional information about those material factors is contained in the company’s most recent Management’s Discussion and Analysis, which is available on SEDAR and EDGAR, as well as on the company’s website at nacg.ca. I will now turn the conference over to Joe Lambert, President and CEO.

Thanks, Julie. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining our call today. Similar to previous calls, I am going to start with our operational performance before handing it over to Jason for the financial overview and then I will conclude with the operational priorities, bid pipeline, outlook for 2023 and our capital allocation before taking your questions. On slide three, our trailing 12-month total recordable rate of 0.53 represents a significant improvement from the start of the year and the Q4 rate of 0.30 was the best quarter of the year. The 0.53 achieved is slightly above our industry-leading target frequency of 0.5 and we will be focusing our efforts in 2023 on prevention of high potential injury events, implementing our active safety program, auditing critical tasks and further advancing our use of developing technology in areas such as collision avoidance, fatigue management and drone use for remote safety monitoring. On slide four, we highlight some of the major achievements of 2022. I am not going to go through this list individually, but I would simply summarize that, we resolved our first half issues, executed well on our winter works programs, safely and efficiently closed out the year and are focused on carrying our momentum forward into 2023 and looking to take advantage of the opportunities presented in this continuing strong demand market. Slide five shows the cumulative financial results for the year and I am proud to say all four of the noted metrics of revenue, EBITDA, EPS and free cash flow are company records. As you can see on the following slide six, the trend for continuing improvements is consistent. More than doubling both EBITDA and EPS in just four years is an impressive pace that we are eager to maintain. The next two slides represent two areas…

Thanks, Joe. This quarter’s financial review begins on slide 10, with a few of our key performance indicators. Combined revenue of $320 million represented the highest level of revenue this company has ever had in a quarter and is a step change for a variety of reasons that we will briefly touch on. This revenue culminated with trailing 12 revenue exceeding $1 billion and conveniently occurred in the last quarter of our fiscal year. The $1.054 billion mark exceeded our previous company record of $1.016 billion but under a much different margin profile. From this gross margin perspective, we realized 17.8% in the quarter, which is more in the range of what we expect and is based on the improved context that Joe touched on and is much discussed throughout this quarter’s materials. Moving to slide 11. On a combined basis, revenue was 36% ahead of Q4 2022. Revenue generated primarily by our core heavy equipment fleet was up 30% quarter-over-quarter with the drivers of this increase being equitable contributions from adjusted equipment and unit rates as well as improved equipment utilization. In Q4, we had a full quarter of revised equipment and unit rates, which were updated in late Q3 to reflect the inflationary cost pressures experienced in the Fort McMurray region. Equipment operating hours were up over 15% in the quarter and stable operational and maintenance headcount yielded utilization of 75%, which was significantly higher than Q3 2021 utilization of 64%. Vacancy rates related to the Heavy Equipment Technician roles were steady in the quarter and combined with increases in third-party vendors were the primary factors in the overall equipment utilization achieved. Wholly owned business lines, primarily being DGI Trading and the external sales of equipment -- of rebuilt haul trucks, each posted strong revenue in the quarter…

Thanks, Jason. Looking at slide 17. This slide summarizes our priorities for 2023. I have previously discussed our leveraging of technology shown in item two, but wanted to highlight the other three areas that will be particularly important to progress in 2023. The first area of focus and core to our culture and values is our ongoing efforts to ensure each and every one of our employees return home safely at the end of every workday. I mentioned earlier how we are using technology to improve safety through implementation of collision avoidance systems, fatigue monitoring and using drones for assessing and monitoring remote work areas. With that said, we are likewise focusing on the workforce. We feel our growing workforce requiring increased new hires and an industry supply low end experience will be best served with an increased focus on further developing our front run supervision and expanding our green hand training programs. Jumping over item three to item four, we continue to prioritize increasing our skilled trades workforce. NACG has an extensive and comprehensive program to expand both our Acheson and field based maintenance workforce. We have likewise used our procurement team to bring additional vendors from other provinces and countries to support our maintenance needs as the existing vendors and OEMs have struggled to support the increased industry demand. There’s a slide in the appendix on page 31, which we have expanded to show both NACG and vendor maintenance workforce numbers for those interest in seeing how we have built up the skilled trade workforce over time. The ongoing priority will be to continue adding to both internal and vendor capacity until we have maximized our mechanical availability and fleet utilization, and then continuing hiring and training internally to replace higher cost vendors. As stated previously, we expect…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Yuri Lynk from Canaccord. Please go ahead.

Good morning, guys. Great quarter.

Thanks, Yuri.

Just on the utilization, I think you said, you are targeting 75% to 85%. So should we think about that as the seasonally weaker quarters are at the lower end of that range and quarters like Q4 could be towards that mid-80s level. Is that the way to think about it for this year?

It’s certainly getting to that point where we are consistently in that range. I would expect the Q4 and Q1 to be on the higher end and the Q2 and Q3 is on the lower end of that range. And that’s really what we need to demonstrate in this Q2 and Q3 is that we can get into the lower ranges of that.

Okay. And that’s -- the main driver there is that small fleet of construction equipment that’s exited the oil sands, is that right? And where have you put that to work, like is it on kind of small- and medium-sized jobs or is it on larger?

It’s -- I’d split it into a few things, Yuri. It’s -- there’s still 100-ton, 150-ton trucks in oil sands that stay very busy during the winter that have not in the past half a dozen years had high utilization during summer civil construction. So during the winter, they are usually very well engaged in reclamation activities, but historically, it slows down in summer. And then in addition to that, our progress on utilization outside of oil sands, which really is -- we are forecasting the completion of the Northern Ontario Gold job, and with that, we have got that fleet transitioning. And I’d say, conservatively, we have it coming out of that mine and going into oil sands and having lower utilization, and obviously, a period of non-use while it’s demobing and being transported. So there is upside opportunity on those assets as well.

Okay. Suncor is out there talking about looking to trim their contractor headcount or use of contractors for a variety of reasons. But is that an opportunity for you guys or a threat or how do you think about that?

We haven’t seen that coming in the earthworks side. So I guess our impression, Yuri, that it’s mostly happening on plant site side and they are consolidating vendors, which makes a lot of sense. We have got a lot of work consolidated in the earthwork site already. So I don’t think this is an area that they are looking to reduce contractors. And from what we see in the demand and the volume requirement side, we don’t see any reduction in that demand for a long time.

Okay. I will leave it there, guys. Thank you.

You bet.

Your next question comes from Aaron MacNeil from TD Securities. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Joe…

Good morning, Aaron.

Hey. If I compare your Q4 slide deck with the Q3 one, it looks like that large oil sands bid got pushed out a couple of quarters, am I right in interpreting that correctly and how should…

It -- when I would -- it was actually -- it’s supposed to be put on the commencement dot and we put it on the tender dot in the previous one. So it -- these contracts run through the end of 2023. So the dot was always supposed to be on January 1, 2024. So the dots are supposed to be when the work commences. And so it hasn’t -- that side of it hasn’t changed. We just made a mistake where we put it in Q3.

Yeah. No problem.

And the tender process has pushed out from last year to this year, but obviously, there’s plenty of time to have it awarded before next year.

And I guess just as a quick follow-up on that, how much of that work would be like work you currently have versus incremental work?

I’d say probably half of it is work we are currently doing. The difference being that, obviously, right now, our backlog reflects one year left of it and this would be five years of -- so we are going to peak in every cycle of five years in backlog with those oil sands awards and then they are going to work their way down over the five years and then get awarded again. So we are kind of at the low level of our backlog right now and that awarded that work. And I’d say, probably, half that is what we are currently doing.

Got it.

And the other -- but not work that we have five years of scope on work we are doing this year, I’d say. Is that clear, Aaron?

Yeah. No. That’s perfect. Joe, you mentioned in your prepared remarks that, Q2 and Q3 have the most uncertainty around utilization. You are guiding to a relatively flat year, next year on a year-over-year basis. There’s obviously some puts and takes. So I thought it might be a good opportunity for us to kind of just get a bit more context around the various moving parts, like from what I can think of, I am sure there’s other ones, too, but you have had the negative impact of inflation in 2022 versus 2023. You have got a full year of Fargo-Moorhead in 2023, and then offsetting that, you have got the maybe the negative impact to the Côté Project in 2023. So, I guess, could you frame how material all three of those impacts are and then...

I think you have almost finished answering your own question there.

I just…

That’s exactly what I would have said is that, where we place that Côté fleet, there’s actually opportunity even on the same site and in the same regions that could have great improvements on utilization from forecast. The Fargo-Moorhead ramp up, but it is lower risk, lower margin work at Fargo, with the big infrastructure work, which I think we have always said. And then there are some areas in projecting the improvements in utilization and projecting the benefits that we are achieving in telematics, where I’d say, we are cautious to project trends that are going very up very quickly without a lot of data points. And we certainly want to get a few more dots on the map or data before we confidently project things higher than where we currently are. So I think those are all opportunities that we will see really out of Q1 and what we see happening in Q2 and get a little closer to it.

Maybe I will ask the question a bit differently. I am wondering on materiality. Like if you take those three factors and forget everything else, like, net-net, are those…

They would all be positive.

Okay. So there’s potential for upside revisions to your guidance to the extent that…

Yeah. I -- yes. And I -- what I would say, we are -- you have heard me use the term stronger for longer in the commodity marketplace. I have been in mining business for 40 years now. This is the strongest across all commodities from a demand side and one that looks like it’s going to run a long cycle because of the EV metals. Certainly, I have seen -- while we are talking about energy, coal, met coal, thermal coal, base metals, precious metals, lithium, graphite, this is generational kind of demand cycle we are seeing in commodities, certainly for my generation anyways, I have never seen it. And I think that’s an overall driver that gives us confidence that demand there, it’s getting the mechanical availability and utilization out of our fleet and executing…

Okay.

…and that’s what we do.

Thanks, Joe. I will turn it over.

You bet.

Your next question comes from Jacob Bout from CIBC. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning. This is Rahul on for Jacob.

Good morning, Rahul.

Good morning. So I just had a question on 2023 guidance and the current backlog. So guidance, if we look at the EBITDA guidance, it implies an improvement over 2022, but the backlog levels are lower both quarter-on-quarter, year-on-year. If you just talk about backlog duration and whether you expect to use more from backlog this year compared to last year?

No. As I stated a couple of times in the presentation, we expect our backlog to be over $2 billion by the end of the year. It’s just a cyclical nature where we have got a regional contract, which is a line, four main producing sites and they are on a five-year cycle. So you are going to have -- you are going to peak every time they are awarded and over the next five years, those are going to draw down. So and I am just talking about half the business that’s in the oil sands right now. So the decline quarter-to-quarter would be expected because these contracts are only awarded every five years. As soon as -- we thought it might -- it originally came out and looked like it was going to be awarded last year, but because of all the inflationary pressures and because they can, they pushed it off until this year. And so we expect that to be five years of our -- about 75% of our work in oil sands is going to get committed to a five-year contract. And so the quarter-to-quarter decline in backlog from three to four really didn’t matter. That’s -- every time after these awards occur, that’s going to happen in oil sands. And we have had significant wins outside even like the big infrastructure project in the states, that’s got a six and a half year operating construction in 29 years of operations and maintenance, that number is just going to draw down over that six and a half years of construction more than anything else. Did that cover off what you are looking for, Rahul?

Okay. Yeah. Yeah. That’s helpful. Thank you. And maybe just on the Fargo-Moorhead project. So has that project been fully ramped up or would you say there’s still more runway from a quarterly contribution perspective over the next couple of quarters?

No. We -- it just -- we just opened it up in roughly September of last year. We just started earthworks, and the earthworks side of it, we will get pretty close to peak this year. So we will get full year operating. We had roughly a quarter last year. Well, the full year contribution this year. And really this year and next year are getting to where we will peak, peak production, peak workforce on those sites. Generally, it will happen during the summer, but they run all year long. So they have been operating -- they are operating today, they were operating last week and they will operate continuously now for the next six years.

Great. And maybe just last one for me, so when we look at your guidance ranges, I guess, the question is, what determines the low and high end, and does this assume a relatively quick transition of the Côté Gold Mine fleet?

We have got a pretty conservative estimate of that fleet coming out of Côté, taking a reasonable amount of time for transportation and then going into a lower utilization aspect. But if we had a very quick transition and got it into a 24x7 high utilization, which is what we would like to do and what [Audio Gap] So it’s not a huge amount. It’s not going to change that range. But there’s a lot of other contributing factors, predominantly our utilization and whether our fleet mechanical availability. As I have told people before about every point of utilization is worth about $1 million a month in topline. So continuing to add and if you look at last year’s averages versus this year, if we can continually add and get better and get into that range of 75% to 85%, it will have positive impacts going forward.

Great. Thank you. I will pass it over.

Thanks.

Your next question comes from Tim Monachello from ATB Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Hey. Good morning, guys.

Good morning, Tim.

Good morning.

Congrats on blowing the roof up on this quarter. It’s been a long time coming.

Thanks.

I also got to say, you got to be quick on the trigger finger to get a question in this queue. These analysts, I don’t think I could win in a duel.

Yeah.

For some of these guys work out [ph]. Anyways, a lot of my questions have been covered off. One of them, though, the maintenance headcount slide, it’s interesting detail that you provided here between third-party vendors and your NACG headcount. It looks like the gap between that is widening out a little bit. But it seems to be within your historical range, you made some comments in your prepared remarks that you are hoping to ramp both of those two lines higher and then try to close the gap basically and convert or just sort of reduce the amount of third-party vendors. Where would you like to see that ratio of NACG headcount to third-party vendors and what could that mean to your margin profile if you were to close that gap?

I don’t know if I have calculated that one, Tim. I could take a stab at it. But we would probably want a good 90% of that workforce to be our own internally. We have always got some around generally you want for any kind of warranty work, as well as some technical support, if you need it. And I’d have to sit down with Jason to calculate that number. But external guys are probably roughly twice as much as internal guys in the expense side. You are carrying obviously, a lot of another company’s cost and overheads in not just the direct labor and they are not doing it for free also. So we have been good. We have dropped them out when we have needed to. Obviously, you will see during the pandemic. Last year, it dropped because they couldn’t give us guys. That’s what that trough is and we had to build up more vendor support just to get to where we needed to. But as we increase our own and approach that high utilization, then we will start pulling vendors out.

Okay. Got it. And, obviously, it doesn’t seem like it’s much of an issue anymore having trying to staff. So maybe you can just put in context, like, what does the market look like now for heavy equipment mechanics compared to what it looked like in the middle of 2022?

All right.

And is there any…

Yeah.

…growth that you weren’t able to complete in Q4 just given mechanical equipment availability?

We could have done more. I’d say that we weren’t anywhere near the top end of our mechanical availability of our fleet even with that utilization and we had demand that would have kept every piece here running that we could get running and we could put operators. It’s not over, Tim, and this is not going to be an issue that even goes away in years’ time, because this is going to be an ongoing issue of skilled trades in Canada and that’s the way we are looking at this. This isn’t a seasonal. This isn’t a year. This isn’t a cycle. We are changing the way we do this business and looking at how we do our premises, looking into how we bring in vendors, how we bring more equipment down here and do more work in regional shops that we can get more people at, continuing to expand our facilities. This is going to be something that is a long time, we will be talking about it 10 years from now, because it’s not going to get easier and we definitely want to be on the leading edge of this, because it’s -- as you have seen, it drives utilization and utilization is key to our business.

Okay. That’s great. One other thing that I wanted to touch on, I think, Yuri asked about it was just around that utilization range that you are alluding to in the 75% to 85% range and thinking that you might be able to get to the bottom end of that range in Q2, and historically, your Q2 has sort of maxed out around the 60% range in terms of 60% to 65% range in terms of utilization. How do you get that extra 10 points of utilization in Q2 in the oil sands?

Well, it’s availability of our big truck fleet that we know we have demand on is the biggest driver. That’s the one we can control. And then what we are looking for is some increased demand on the smaller end of the fleet with increased civil construction works over the summer and those are the drivers. So we got to have the demand first and then it’s in our hands to make the equipment available and put operators in the seat. So we have the demand on the big equipment year-round. We are looking to see if there’s increases further in the small stuff or even moving some of that outside of oil sands again to improve utilization and then it’s up to us to execute on the maintenance and the maintenance planning to get mechanical availability over and above what our needs are there. So it’s -- that’s why I said committing to those kind of numbers and projecting it, we got to put a few more runs on the board. You can’t draw a line with a single data point, we need a few. And I am very pleased with how we have progressed and we have exceeded our expectations so far. But there’s a lot of moving parts in this, and Q2 and Q3 will be great tell-tell signs if we can get into that range and even on the low end in those quarters. I feel a lot more confident projecting it year round.

Where would utilization be in Q1 so far?

We are in the 70s.

Actually, we are in the high 70s.

I mean that’s -- again you are talking Q1 and that’s a January number. So it’s continuing from where it was in December.

Okay. That’s really helpful. And then what would be the utilization that you are assuming for the year in your guidance range?

I don’t have that number off hand. I’d have to get back to you, Tim.

Okay. No worries there. And then the other question that I had was just around the free cash flow guidance. I noticed that there’s a $25 million deferral. I think that has to do with just sort of distributions from the Fargo-Moorhead project and then it wasn’t added back or it seems sort of flat from -- in 2023 from 2022. So I am curious like, if you were to include the cash being held in the Fargo project or any of your JVs is not being distributed, how much free cash flow -- what would this free cash flow profile look like for the entire business year-over-year?

I can take that one, Tim. It’s a bit of a loaded question. I don’t know if you are asking to normalize 2022. But, yeah, between $20 million and $25 million is the impact we have seen between earnings and then cash distributed. So whether you want to add that $20 million or $25 million to 2022 or 2023 is up to the reader. I would say for 2023 purposes in our range, as you noted, we left the range the same. We have modestly increased kind of the core business cash generation and then kept the expectation from our JVs the same as we had planned out in October of last year. So we have left it the same. We understand the volatility of JV distributions and we are in the kind of $40 million to $45 million of distributions coming from the JVs. That was our expectation last quarter, continues to be our expectation. If we are -- if the JVs are able to exceed that, we would see upside. But clearly, with the impact we had in 2022, we didn’t want to over promise for 2023. And so $85 million to $105 million is still a very strong cash flow generation and other step change in our capital allocation flexibility, but there clearly is volatility with free cash flow.

No. Absolutely. I am just trying to sort of understand better, I guess, the underlying operational free cash generation of the business rather than and I understand -- and why you would only talk about the distributions out of the JV, but I think from a -- to understand the value proposition here, we need to understand the cash flow -- cash generating aspect of those JVs as well, so that’s what I was trying to touch on. Anyway, I will turn it back and thanks very much for the details.

Yeah. Thank you.

Your next question comes from Bryan Fast from Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Yeah. Good morning, guys.

Good morning, Bryan.

Just on the inflation adjustments midway through the year. Is it safe to say that that was fully reflected in Q4 or is there any lag there?

It was fully reflected in Q3 already, Bryan. So, yeah, there’s no lag and no lag or retro in Q4 either, so.

Okay. Thanks. And then I appreciate the color on the telematics, but are you able to quantify maybe the returns or payback relative to your investments just on that installation?

I’d say it’s already -- savings already exceed cost operating even in its first year, last year and we expect that to continue. I think that we would expect it to double this year and we aren’t adding any people or cost. The operating cost per machine hour is less than what we had forecasted and the savings are higher. So and it pays for itself very quickly.

Okay. That’s it for me. Appreciate the color.

Thanks, Bryan.

Your next question comes from Maxim Sytchev from National Bank Financial. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning, gentlemen.

Good morning, Max.

Just a couple of quick ones for me, if I may. Joe, I guess, do you mind providing a bit of color on your initial perception around Fargo, how that’s ramping up sort of any changes? I think you made some comments a number of months ago, like in terms of how inflation could be potentially impacting the economics. Just wondering if you have some refreshed math as, obviously, some of the things have normalized. So, yeah, maybe any color on that, please?

Sure. It’s ramping up well. We have been hitting our productivity numbers. We peaked for the year coming up in the summer. But on the earthwork side, which is what’s being executed right now, it’s progressed very well. So equipment and people and everything is working fine. We will start getting into some of the bridge work with our partners. We don’t actually execute that side of it, but our partners will be coming up this summer and commencing that. We did our initial kind of forecast reviews and where we were on inflation and the impacts on our risk assessments and those initial items said that the increases incurred were within our risk matrix, and we are covered off by that and that our project margins and schedule remained intact. And our next -- will probably be towards the end of this year, beginning in next year, where we do kind of the full-on, full-blown forecast of the whole job for the first time after everything has commenced and that will be our first real test of how did the project sit versus how it’s being executed, and hopefully, we have some positive impacts with our -- what we see in our earthwork side over the summer and we are able to beat our targets in the big ramp up the year this year. So I guess it’s a stay-tuned kind of a message, but the other side of it is we have gone through and modeled that inflationary pressures in and we haven’t seen a reduction in our expected project margins.

Okay. Super helpful. Thank you so much. And then last question, pertaining more to capital allocation and some of the earlier comments, Joe, that you made around sort of EV battery metals and how it’s such a robust market. Do you mind maybe, I mean, painting a bit of a picture in terms of how that potentially could fit sort of the preference for M&A or just maybe any color from that perspective? Thanks.

There -- to put some color on when you look at that bid map and those dots on that map, the blue dots and there’s some significantly large ones. Those are areas of iron ore, copper, nickel, gold and opportunities that we see that have -- what we tend to call a high go win percentage that they are going to go forward and that we have a good opportunity to win them. So from a bidding perspective, the work outside of oil sands in the other commodities been as strong as we have seen it. We continue to look at other markets around the world for M&A opportunities and that’s when we will look at -- and this fits in just with the overall capital allocation, Max. Obviously, we addressed our dividend. We are looking at the debt because of the high interest rates, but we also see some opportunities in the M&A side. Obviously, we have had success in vertically integrated bolt-ons like ML Northern and DGI. Those have been great value and we see them continuing to be. So if opportunities come up like that and they are great returns or even the bigger ones do, we are going to pursue them, and we have consistently seen the small ones and we do think there’s some opportunities for some bigger ones that have historically struggled to be accretive. But if -- they have to have the returns we are looking for, otherwise, we are going to look at deleveraging, which there’s nothing wrong with that either, right?

Yeah. No. Absolutely. And maybe-- one maybe providing a bit of sort of read-through on how the expectations of sellers changed or maybe not over the last kind of nine months, has it been static or have you seen sort of a reset of expectations on that side as well?

Yeah. I don’t know if I have ever seen anything consistent in that regard anyways. I think it’s opportunistic. You find sellers in the right spot at the right time when you are looking at something. So I just think we found great fits and timing with sellers on our DGI and our ML Northern and great fits in those cultures. They have made for extremely smooth integration into our business and those -- I wouldn’t call those normal. I think it’s just been a great opportunistic setup for us. But every seller is a little different, and I don’t think there’s a consistent trend there. But when we see opportunities where the integration of the business and the culture and there’s synergy and there’s opportunities to learn from one another and grow off each other, they tend to be the ones that provide the best financial side as well. So that’s what we look for is things that vertically integrate in our business, have a good return for us, help us lower our costs, while giving us opportunity to expand in external services or other businesses similar to us, we think we can increase our diversification geographically and in commodity and customers and have good accretion numbers. Those are the ones we are looking for.

Yeah. Makes sense and I appreciate all the comments. Thanks so much.

No worry. Thanks, Max.

Thanks, Max.

This concludes the Q&A section of the call and I will pass the call over to Joe Lambert, President and CEO, for closing remarks.

Thanks, Julien, and thanks, everyone. I really appreciate you joining us today and look forward to talking to you again next quarter.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes your conference for today. We thank you for joining and ask that you please disconnect your lines. Thank you.