Good day, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to Noah Holdings Limited Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2018 Financial Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. After the close of the US market on Tuesday, Noah issued a press release announcing its fourth quarter and full year 2018 financial results, which is available on the company's IR website at http.//ir.noahgroup.com. This call is also being webcast live and will be available for replay purposes on the company's website. I would like to call your attention to the Safe Harbor statements in connection with today's call. The company will make forward-looking statements including those with respect to expected future operating results and expansion of its business. Please refer to the risk factors inherent in the company's business and that have been filed with the SEC. Actual results may be materially different from any forward-looking statements the company makes today. Noah Holdings Limited does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise except as required under the applicable law. The results announced today are unaudited and subject to adjustments in connection with the completion of the company's audit. Additionally, certain non-GAAP measures will be used in our financial discussion. A reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP financial results can be found in the earnings press release posted on the company's website. With that, I would now like to hand the call over to Shang Chuang, Noah's Chief Financial Officer. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. I want to welcome all investors and analyst friends to our earnings conference call today. For today's agenda, Ms. Wang Jingbo, Chairlady and CEO of Noah will first briefly summarize Noah's overall performance for the full year 2018 and discuss our core businesses, wealth management and asset management, as well as overall market and regulatory environment. I will follow up with the detailed discussion on Noah's fourth quarter and full year financial performance in 2018. We will conclude the call with a questions-and-answer session. Now I would like to turn Ms. Jingbo Wang for her prepared remarks.

Thank you, Shang. The recently passed 2018 was marked by a global macro environment that was full of uncertainty highlighted by China; US trade conflicts, geopolitical friction and global capital market volatility. Domestically, China is faced with rigorous economic downward pressure, resulting from the compounding effect of several economic cycles, such as the downturn of economic growth, the turning point of demographic dividend, as well as the decline of consumer demand and employment. Real economy enterprises are facing difficulties in operations, especially those small and medium sized companies with increased capital and cost pressures. In the financial market, the general economic deleveraging continued to ramp-up Asia market and increased policy uncertainty cumulatively resulted in a hugely challenging year for investors. In 2018, bond defaults in China reached RMB120 billion. The outstanding balance of peer-to-peer online loans exceeded RMB1 trillion at peak, of which 70% were at risk. And the total number of online lending platform decreased by over 50%. There were more than 400 listed companies, of which the controlling shareholders stock pledge rate exceeded 90%. Looking at short term, market risks appeared to have been fully exposed and investors' mentality is overall panic. However, from a medium to long term perspective, we can see that the market is actually brewing new opportunities. The best way to eliminate risk is to expose the risk and never waste a good crisis are the two phrases that helped us better understand the market situation in 2018, and also through this process can we truly witness the end of an era and the beginning of a new one. The crisis of 2018 allowed us to learn you reap what you sow and to experience a complete cause and effect cycle. Several core viewpoints that we want to share with the market. First, the…

Thank you, Chairlady, and hello, everyone. We are pleased with our solid financial performance for the fourth quarter and full year 2018 Net revenues in the fourth quarter increased 13.8% year-over-year to RMB822.1 million and full year net revenues increased 16.4% year-over-year to RMB3.3 billion. On the bottom line, non-GAAP attributable net income in the fourth quarter grew 29.2% year-over-year to RMB223.2 million and full year net income grew 20.7% to RMB1.01 billion in line with the guidance we previously provided reflecting our strong performance in 2018 despite macro headwinds. I will now discuss in more details about our fourth quarter financial results. We distributed RMB25.2 billion worth of financial products, which generated RMB242.9 million in one-time commission, substantially the same as the corresponding period in 2017. Recurring service fees for the quarter reached RMB448.4 million, up 13.1% year-over-year. Fourth quarter performances fees income was soft at around RMB11 million due to weak performance of secondary market equity products. Lastly, other service fees more than doubled reaching RMB126.2 million, primarily due to the growth of our lending business. Operating income increased 17.8% year-over-year to RMB159.7 million in the fourth quarter and operating margin was 19.4% compared with 18.8% for the corresponding period in 2017 due to improved cost control. Now turning to full year 2018, amidst challenging operating environment and market volatility, we distributed over RMB110 billion worth of financial products, slightly down by 6.3%. Revenues from one-time commissions were RMB1.03 billion and effective one-time commission rate was 0.93% compared with 0.94% in 2017. Recurring service fees grew more than 26%, reaching RMB1.8 billion, as Gopher AUM continued to grow, up 14.1%, and Gopher's effective growth management fee rate increased from 0.62% in 2017 to 0.76% in 2018. More than half of our total revenues continue to come from recurring…

[Operator Instructions] We will now begin the question-and-answer session. And our first question comes from Chang Shang of Nomura. Please go ahead.

Congratulations for the very good results in a very challenged 2018. I got two questions. Firstly, can you give us more color on the key difference between the non-GAAP net income and the reported net income, particularly the tax effect of government? Second, since the equity market sentiment next year is quite strong, your guidance on that non-GAAP net income is too conservative? Thanks.

Thank you. I will answer these two questions. First for our guidance, we've been now listed for around eight years, and I think our practice is to be prudent in terms of giving full year guidance. And we note that for the beginning of 2019, capital markets did improve quite a bit, but if people recall in the beginning of 2018, it's actually very similar situation. So I - still very early on in 2019, so we want to be prepared for any potential volatility. And as always, we will update the market accordingly, if our full year guidance changes. In regarding to the second question, for the reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP results, we primarily adjust for four items, one is share based compensation; second, is fair value change and unrealized equity securities; and the third is the actual sales of equity securities; and lastly, tax effect adjustment. The last item is new to our non-GAAP results adjustment and this in discussion with our auditor. We just want to make sure that for the non-GAAP results on a tax basis, it is consistent to GAAP net income. The detailed reconciliations could be found in the 6-K that we announced a couple of hours ago.

And our next question comes from Daphne Poon of Citi. Please go ahead.

Hi, thank you for taking my questions. So my first question is actually a follow-up to the previous question about like the market and the investor sentiment. So I guess, I'll pass on the Asia market rebound, we also see a lot of supportive policy coming out since late last year to call for more support like for the private sector or the SMB. So I was wondering if there has been any change in terms of the - your current risk appetite or sentiment reasons, given all these policy easing are they more or less --are there any like in terms of your transaction volume year-to-date, and especially on the PE product side, we know that 2018 has been a pretty tough year. So wondering if there is any recovery on that front? And the second question is about the management fee rate on the Gopher Asset Management business. We see that the fee rate was kind of based on both quarter-on-quarter and year-over-year, so wondering if we can have more color on that. Thank you.

Okay. Sure. Daphne, if you can allow us a couple of minute to translate your questions. Yes, I will answer the second question regarding Gopher Asset Management fee rate and Madam Wang will answer the first question regarding high risk appetite. So for Gopher, if you look, I think you're referring to Gopher's net management fee rate, which was down quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year. The decline year-over-year is mainly because of the - for certain product, the split between our asset management and our wealth management is slightly different. So if you actually look at Gopher's gross management fee rate, it's actually improved versus the same year for 2017. So the full year of 2017, gross fee rate is roughly about 62 basis points, whereas for the full year of 2018, it's about 74 basis points. So I would encourage analyst and investor to look at the fee rate on net basis, as well as the gross basis. And I want to remind people that for both our asset management business and wealth management businesses, they are both wholly-owned and depending on the product, the management fee rate on the segment reporting might be slightly different.

Yes. So year-to-date in 2019, we do note the pickup in Asia prices and there's a bit of euphoria now in terms of public equity investing. However, if you look at it more closely, a lot of the increases are more weighted towards smaller company or company that had yet really proven sustainable earning abilities. And so we're still a bit cautious in terms of guiding our investors to increase the equity investments. We are prudent in that. We work and select with high quality managers. These managers are more fundamental based in terms of their investing approach, and we will help our clients to look at a time horizon just two years to three years, rather the short term volatility either it's up or down. Now, there have been a lot of discussions and policies on the new innovative board that we will reform the way that private company can be listed, particularly those in the high-tech sector. This introduction is quite promising. Actually, it will be quite good for a lot of our venture capital and private equity investments. I know, last week one of the general partners that we're quite familiar with have lined up 16 meetings or for 16 of their portfolio companies to meet with regulators about potential listing on the Innovation Technology Board. With that said, in terms of long term risk appetite for our investors, I think is not yet fully recovered. There is some improvement. But again, I think it's too early to conclude whether this is going to be a sustainable market. And however, nonetheless, we will continue to maintain our advantages, particularly in equity investments. We strongly believe that China's equity capital markets will develop on a long term basis, similar to the US, so building and securing strategic relationship with quality asset manager is crucial. We believe the top 10% manager will generate the bulk of the return, and by building that long-term relationship and providing access to the managers, we'll be able to maintain our leadership position in terms of working with and investing in high quality equity managers.

Our next question comes from Xue Yuan of CICC. Please go ahead.

[Foreign Language]

Thank you. Xue Yuan from CICC. For the benefit of the audience, I'll translate your two questions. The first question is regarding transaction value for the fourth quarter. We note that it's slightly down year-over-year. It would be helpful if management could provide some color on transaction value for 2019? The second question is we have noticed that the banks - the large banks in China all have cited plans to set up asset management subsidiaries. And from the information that we have collected, these asset management subsidiaries can distribute various products to the public. So how do you think this will impact the wealth management industry, as a whole? Yes. So Mr. Zhao wanted to comment on the first question. So for the full year 2018, as well as for the fourth quarter 2018 transaction value, it's slightly down around 5% to 10% year-over-year. The main reason is because in 2018, we saw that the overall transaction value for private equity product or this asset class was down meaningfully around 40%, more than 40%. We performed probably better than the overall private equity fundraising market, as the overall industry fundraising was down more than 60%. Now with that big level of drop in private equity in 2018, we still manage on overall base of transactions - similar slightly down from 2017 because we have demonstrated or continuously demonstrated our ability to adjust product mix based on the changing economic and investing environment. So in 2018 you saw that our fixed income of products grew and we also distributed more insurance product in 2018 as well. This addressed our clients risk aversion and so safer product with higher sensitivity, more cash flow was more preferred. Now we continue to work on diversified product strategies, we believe this is important to…

Our next question comes from Katherine Lei of J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead.

Yes. Can you hear me?

It's a bit light. It'll be great if you can speak up or get closer to microphone.

Okay. Is it better now?

Yes, much better now. Thank you.

Okay. Sure. So I have two questions. One question is on the lending business because management - management and - that was the driver for growth in the 4Q. Can we have some more details on the reasons we were on the lending business and what is their strategy on that one? The second question is on WMP sales because we noted that the percentage of - the contribution from fixed income product has been increasing back to about 80% of the total WMP sales. What is management's guidance on 2019? Will that be a change in product mix? And if that is then would that be subject to change in fee rate because we understand that different products will have different -

Okay. Thank you, Katherine. Madam Wang wants to address your questions first, and I'll provide some support in terms of numbers.

Okay. Yes. So the first question is regarding our lending business. Historically, in terms of our wealth management business, credit has not been an advantage because we're not a bank. However, many years ago, we have already noted that on a long term basis, high net worth clients or wealth management clients would have short term lending needs or credit needs. So we started to test on a small basis lumbar lending, collateralizing our clients wealth management products and providing them with short term loans, then we expanded the credit business to - for property collateralization. The way that we approached our lending business or credit business, it's actually quite prudent. Over the last few years, the NPL, non-performing loan is nearly zero. Our - the way we look at our business is to provide lending to high quality borrowers with very sound collateral. And so, we will continue to expand this business with this approach. We want to blend to high quality borrowers. And just to give you a sense, for 2018, the average LTV is around 70%, the average ATR and the growth interest rate that we charge is around 10%. So both of these figures reflects the fact that we're working with - are dealing with very high quality borrowers and the average ticket size for the loans is around RMB1 million. Now, regarding the second question on transaction value for fixed income products. Now 2018, we did see transaction of our fixed income product to grow. This reflected the risk aversion of client sentiment and appetite in 2018. And we were able to grow our fixed income product because we started to build our expertise and abilities around asset backed securities many years ago, as early as three years ago. So we focus and work with…

And our next question comes from Edward Du of Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Thanks, management. I have two questions. The first one is a follow-up question to the distribution amount. And I think that I just found according to the China ventures data, which you've quoted before, we've seen the PE/VC market distribution in January this year was still quite muted. And can you just let us know more about your year-to-date, maybe to just march the progress of your PE/VC distribution amongst year-on-year growth and the overall trend. And did you see any clients overall risk appetite to rebound - regarding - given the rebound of the Asia markets. And can we know more details about how the technology innovation board, could help your PE/VC distribution business because I think the more - is more related to your product exits. How does it could help your product distribution side? And my second question is about the tax rate. I just noticed that in your 4Q last year, your tax rate just declined meaningfully to 16% compared to last like 12 quarters, the average at around 22% to 23%. May we know is this one-off reason? Or is there any reason to support continual trending going forward in 2019 and thank you.

Yes. Edward, if you will give us a minute, I'll translate both of your questions to Chinese for my colleagues. Hold on. Thank you.

Yes. So for the overall transaction value for venture capital and private equity for 2019 again, I think it's difficult to predict, but I think there are signs of optimism or there are ways that we can grow this particular asset class. For 2019, there's already plan by some of the very top tier, top performing GP to raise their new flagship fund in the second half of this year. So we have a very robust pipeline of fundraising for venture capital and private equity. And I think the demand, will it be a function of how quickly investor sentiment and appetite can we cover. But in regards of market, we want to continue to be a very active participant and a very active investor in private equity and venture capital. By maintaining our presence and investment, we're in a better position to secure long term strategic relationship with the top tier GPs. And we believe the top tier GP will continue to gain market share and will continue to generate and earn the bulk of the returns. Now, for the introduction and development of the technology Innovation board, this is certainly going to be beneficial not only for exits, but also for new fundraising. Is the Board is successful in generating real life return for serious funds? This will give a lot more confidence for - and - LP investor, particularly high net worth and individuals and family offices because they will be able to see more distribution. Now, a lot of our family offices, who are shareholders of the listed companies, I think they have now really recognize the benefits of investing in private equity. And I think the overall private equity industry is becoming more sophisticated. Some of the unsophisticated capital, they were chasing for short term gain are starting to exit the market. So I think overall valuation, overall expectation for the long term growth of the industry, it's a lot more reasonable. Yes, so that's the - the first question. Regarding the second question, on the effective tax rate for the fourth quarter. I think generally for 2018, I think there are two main reasons that has meaningfully lower, as opposed to 2017. Number one, there were some real life investments that had a lot much smaller tax rate because there was investment that we exited offshore. So that's number one. Number two, the tax rate will also be influenced by the split of our offshore business and onshore business, as the corporate tax rate for these two regions is different. But overall commenting on 2018, I think it's slightly on the lower end of our historical effective tax rate. So I think for 2019, I think it should be closer to that of 2017 rather than that of 2018, but it should be in that range.

Our next question comes from Emma Lou of Merrill Lynch. Please go ahead.

So last month, CSRC public and administrative measures sourcing the public opinion on the sales agency of public raised security investment fund. And we're not - and they are raising the barriers for - for these sales agencies to distribute public raised security investment fund, and we know Noah outright has the license. So I was wondering if these administrative measures will have any impact on our business. Thank you

Thank you, Emma. I believe that Madam Wang want to comment on your question.

Okay. Thank you, Emma. As always, we believe that upcoming regulation, particularly around our core businesses such as wealth management is very important. We maintain very disciplined dialog with the regulators. We have been actively providing comments to these draft regulations. The regulations that you quoted are draft versions, and the regulators are actively speaking with market participants on --we have had several rounds of discussion with the regulators. I think the background of the regulation for 2018, as well as going into 2019 is that over the last few years there has been a lot of --or some aggressive players that are less compliant and they've disrupted the overall market. So as a leading market participant and a compliant leader in the industry, we welcome more regulation. We think with more regulation, it will ensure that the market and the industry development are in a more healthy manner. People are more compliant and that should lead to overall industry control. Now we are very confident about our compliance as we are much - we hold ourselves too much higher standard and trust our KYC, AML as well as key reported. Now for the draft regulations there are some points which highlight them - the development or the need to promote more mutual funds or standardized product. And as mentioned in my earlier comments, I think this is a strategic initiative that we will develop or provide more resources to ensure that our product offerings will expand into a mutual fund and on a global basis. And lastly, I think that we based on our conversation with regulators, we expect there will be more detailed or more updated policy regarding private fund sale. As you mentioned the draft so far is mainly focused around public mutual fund. We expect there will be more details around how distribution private funds will be upgraded and regulated. Thank you.

Okay. Operator, is there any more questions?

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Shang Chuang for any closing remarks.

So that wraps our earnings call. And thank you again analysts and investors. Thank you very much.

The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.