Hello and welcome to the EnPro first quarter 2022 earnings call and webcast. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star, zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to James Gentile, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, James.

Thank you Kevin, and good morning everyone. Welcome to EnPro’s first quarter 2022 earnings conference call. I will remind you that our call is being webcast at enproindustries.com, where you can find the presentation that accompanies this call. With me today is Eric Vaillancourt, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Milt Childress, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin today’s discussion, a friendly reminder that we will be making forward-looking statements on this call that are not historical facts and that are considered forward-looking in nature. These statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including impacts from the pandemic and related governmental responses and their impact on the general economy, as well as other risks and uncertainties that are described in our filings with the SEC, including our most recent Form 10-K. Also during this call, we will reference a number of non-GAAP financial measures. Tables reconciling these measures to the comparable GAAP measures are included in the appendix to the presentation materials. We do not undertake any obligation to update these forward-looking statements. Please note that during this call, we will be providing full year guidance which excludes changes in the numbers of shares outstanding, impacts from future acquisitions, dispositions and related transaction costs, restructuring costs, incremental impacts from inflation, geopolitical variables including the conflict in Ukraine, sanctions and trade tensions on market demand, and costs subsequent to the first quarter, the impact of foreign exchange rate changes subsequent to the end of the first quarter, increases in interest rates differing from assumptions outlined in guidance, impacts from further spread of COVID-19 or other variants, and environmental and litigation charges. It is my pleasure to turn the call over to Eric. Eric?

Thanks James, and good morning everyone. Thank you for joining us today as we provide a strategic and financial update for our first quarter of 2022. 2022 marks our 20th anniversary as an independent public company. Over the last two decades, thanks to the hard work and dedication of the EnPro team, we have built a strong foundation for sustainable growth and value creation. As we charge forward, our enhanced cash flow models will enable us to continue to drive organic growth investments, expand in our key end markets, and selectively pursue acquisitions that fit our strategic and financial criteria. I am proud of how far we have come and I have never been more excited for the future of EnPro and all of our stakeholders. Now onto our first quarter highlights. Our teams’ agile execution produced strong results in our first quarter despite significant inflationary pressures, geographical uncertainty and resulting global macroeconomic headwinds. I would like to thank our entire team for their hard work, resilience and flexibility under challenging circumstances as we continue to deliver to our customers and all of our stakeholders. I am particularly excited about the opportunities arising from our acquisition of NxEdge as we are already realizing the significant benefits of combining the commercial and technological advantages across our advanced surface technologies platform. Our teams are coordinating closely and the combination is demonstrating solid strategic and cultural fit. For the quarter, we delivered strong top line results with organic sales growth of 13.5% with demand for our products and services largely broad based. Amid a challenging environment, our supply chain, operations and commercial team continue to collaborate to secure supply, improve processes, and pursue pricing actions to offset rising material costs, freight and labor costs across the company. That inflationary environment also continues to…

Thanks Eric and good morning everyone. As Eric stated, we had another good quarter even as aggressive inflationary forces persisted and geopolitical issues in Ukraine drove macroeconomic uncertainty and supply chain variability globally. Reported sales of $328.7 million in the first quarter increased 17.7% year-over-year and, as Eric mentioned, 13.5% organically. Positive momentum in the semiconductor, general industrial, heavy duty truck, aerospace, food and pharma, oil and gas, and petrochemical markets, as well as the first quarter contribution from NxEdge drove sales growth, partially offset by the reduction in sales due to last year’s divestitures as well as a continued lag in our automotive market residing in the engineered materials segment due to supply chain related customer delays. Adjusted EBITDA of $67.9 million increased 30.6% over the prior year period, driven primarily by the addition of NxEdge, net of the impact of divestitures completed in 2021. Operating leverage on organic sales growth and strategic pricing initiatives in the quarter were largely offset by increasing raw material costs, rising labor, and freight expenses. Despite these inflationary headwinds, we delivered adjusted EBITDA margin of 20.7%, an increase of approximately 210 basis points compared to the first quarter of 2021. Corporate expenses of $13.4 million in the first quarter of 2022 increased from $11.6 million a year ago, driven primarily by costs incurred from recent acquisition and divestiture activities as well as corporate restructuring charges, partially offset by lower incentive compensation accruals. Adjusted diluted earnings per share of $1.83 increased 33.6% compared to the prior year period, driven by the acquisition of NxEdge and solid demand year-over-year, partially offset by higher interest expense and inflationary forces experienced largely in our heavy duty truck and automotive markets where price initiatives lagged. Moving to a discussion of segment performance, sealing technology sales of $153.6 million…

Thank you Milt. We are committed to strong environmental, social and governance practices that support our objectives to create a more sustainable future for our communities and foster a culture that embraces diversity, champion safety, and empowers our teammates. We established ourselves as a dual bottom line organization many years ago focused both on enterprise-level profitable growth and professional and personal development for our colleagues. These efforts are underpinned by our three timeless values of safety, excellence and respect. Stewardship of our core values sustains our culture daily and is reflected in the ways we work together and engage with our communities, customers, shareholders and suppliers. In 2022, I am pleased to share our five key initiatives to further our ESG related framework: one, build a comprehensive climate action plan, including collecting our energy, water and waste usage of our manufacturing facilities and working towards calculating a greenhouse gas and baseline by year end; two, further our efforts on diversity and inclusion; three, continue enterprise-wide ESG training and increased communication; four, integrate ESG topics into EnPro’s risk management approach; and five, integrate ESG considerations into product and life cycle management. Our ESG initiatives are supported and monitored by the board of directors as our multi-faceted, multi-year framework is implemented. We expect to report progress to all of you on these initiatives on a regular basis. We start 2022 on solid footing as our teams navigate challenging macroeconomic conditions. As a leading industrial technology company, we will continue to invest in our portfolio of businesses that enjoy secular tailwinds, technological differentiation, strong recurring revenue streams, and solid cash flow returns while safeguarding critical environments with compelling products and services for our customers in each of our businesses, and our 20th anniversary as an independent public company, we are building upon our strong foundation as we continue our transformation and lean into our best growth opportunities across the company. With the sustained benefits of our portfolio reshaping actions and our cultural and economic differentiation, I am proud of how far we have all come and incredibly excited for the future. The future at EnPro is bright. Thank you for your time today, and I’ll open the line to questions.

[Operator instructions] Our first question today is coming from Jeff Hammond from Keybanc Capital Markets. Your line is now live.

Hey, good morning guys.

Good morning Jeff.

Just trying to get a better sense on what’s holding back a raise in the revenue or EBITDA guide. It seems like first quarter, very strong start, and certainly sounds like business momentum has continued into 2Q.

Hey Jeff, we did have a good first quarter relative to expectations coming into the year, so the year’s off to a little faster start. We’re seeing some concerns from the global economy - you’re reading the same things that we are, with GDP growth globally being reduced on a couple of occasions, coming down in the U.S. also, not just globally, so we think it’s a little early in the year to be adjusting our guidance even though we had a strong first quarter. That’s really our thinking. We feel like we’ll know more three months from now when we’re on our call talking about our Q2 earnings. We feel like we’ll have a little better outlook for the balance of the year, seeing how the economy develops.

Okay. On sealing tech, I just wanted to--I know you talked about this transitory dynamic with truck and getting price, so I’m just trying to get a better sense of how you’re thinking about margin cadence sequentially into 2Q as some of that pricing comes through and if you think margins all-in for sealing tech for hold flat for the year.

It’s Eric, Jeff. I do think margins will hold flat and maybe even improve throughout the year in sealing. The challenge is we just implemented a price increase March 1 that took effect May 1. We have about a 60-day backlog as well and so we have to work through the backlog before you start to see that price increase, so we’ll start to realize that towards the end of the second quarter somewhere - it will start to filter in middle of May and continue on and build more towards July. We will see momentum in price throughout the year and I expect this to finish flat or slightly even ahead of where we were.

We’ll also have some costs that continue to come back into the company as travel picks up, so overall Jeff, I would say we’re expecting our EBITDA margins as a company to hover around that 20% mark through most of this year.

Okay, and then just last one on AFT, it looks like you had some added investments around Alluxa and for the semi expansion. I’m just wondering if those continue through the year, it looks like if you back out NxEdge, the margins were maybe a little bit lower than the prior year run rate for the base.

Yes, if you exclude NxEdge, you’re right, Jeff - we did have some margin contraction, and it was really attributable to several factors. We are investing in growth, so it’s a good news story. There are some operating costs, [indiscernible] costs that are associated with investing for growth, not only capacity but new product development, so that’s one thing, and we saw that really across the board in the segment. In the optical filter business, we saw it in semiconductors. We continue to ramp up for the three nanometer launch, which by the way is going well, there’s positive momentum there and we expect that to pick up as the year progresses, which will have a beneficial impact on margins and earnings growth in the segment. Then we also have some ongoing investments that we’re making to prepare for the ramp-up that we expect in the United States in the coming years, and we’re continuing to get the new building, the new capacity in Taiwan up to full speed as well, so there’s ongoing growth but it’s all what I would call a good news story - you know, we’re adding expense here in advance of growth that we are very confident about as a team. That’s a big part of it. Now, we did have some mix, product mix that affected margins a bit. We had some cost pressures, even though the cost pressures are more evident in the sealing segment, in the engineered segment. We did have some cost pressures ahead of some pricing initiatives, but overall we’re very positive about the future and the balance of the year for AST.

Okay, great. Thanks guys.

Oh, one other thing I would mention, specifically if you look at LeanTeq, we had a very strong quarter. It was kind of a high water mark in Q1 of last year, so there’s a little bit of a year-over-year comp that we see there. You see it in a couple other places in the company too. You saw it in engineered because we had a very strong first quarter last year as automotive rebounded sharply from the pandemic low, so that’s a little bit of a theme this quarter too compared to last quarter.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Steve Ferazani from Sidoti. Your line is now live.

Morning everyone. Milt, you talked a little bit about economic headwinds, but I just want to get a sense after a very strong quarter, and I think the one area you noted weakness was automotive, but that’s really on the supply side than it is demand, so I’m just trying to get a sense even anecdotally, are you seeing any kind of economic headwinds that are impacting demand from customers at this point?

The short answer is our backlogs are still really strong. At the same time, if you look at spot truck rates starting to drop, they’ve dropped, I think, as much as 20% or 30% in the last few weeks, and that’s usually a leading indicator of what that economy could be doing, so we remain optimistic about our businesses. At the same time, there are some indicators that things are slowing.

Yes, just as an example, the last forecast I saw for GDP for the U.S. for 2022 has now dropped to 2.5% - I just saw that this weekend. Now, that’s not across the board from all sources, but it’s just the indicators, the spot rates, it’s more of the global economic indicators that are affecting us, our decision to hold guidance despite the fact that we had a good first quarter.

Completely understandable, I just wanted to get a sense at this point if you are actually seeing it, and the answer sounds like not yet.

By the way, backlogs are strong and we’re watching order patterns and will continue to watch that, so. We spend a good bit of time at our company with our commercial team, with our supply chain team and watching the indicators, but things are generally favorable as we see them right now.

Then capex was pretty low this quarter. One, I guess the question would be on what you’re expecting for capex this year, and then also given what’s based on your guidance another strong year projected for free cash flow, at what point would you consider returning cash to shareholders or do you still see a really healthy M&A pipeline out there?

Yes, those are good questions. Capital spending was lower than we would have expected in Q1, and we chalk that up to COVID and labor being out, especially early in the quarter, and that made it challenging to move forward with certain projects that are planned for the year. At this point in time, we’d stick with the 3% to 3.5% of capital spending for the full year, and as we’ve said previously, that does not include investments that we may make to support on-shoring of chip production in the U.S. We’ll provide more guidance on that investment as the year progresses. In terms of free cash flow, yes, we expect to have a good free cash flow year. It’s likely that we will have some capital that we’ll be spending to support the semi growth in the U.S. - as I mentioned, we’ll talk more about that as the year progresses, so outside that and outside perhaps we’ve disclosed previously the various environmental matters and progression on environmental matters, specifically with Passaic River, and so we expect there could be some cash outflow to bring that situation to full resolution as the year progresses. But other than that, if you exclude those two items, we would expect free cash flow for the year to be about equal to adjusted net income for the year, so that’s favorable, and I think our cash flow is more predictable with the portfolio of companies that we have today versus what we had a few years ago.

Great, thanks.

In terms of the use of that capital, that cash, right now our focus is paying down debt. We want to reduce our leverage and then we also want to use some of our capital for ongoing investment. We have organic growth investments to support and we could have some inorganic opportunities that are strategic as the year progresses, so that’s our primary--our expectation for the primary use of cash this year.

Great. Eric, Milt, appreciate all the color. Thanks

Thanks Steve.

Thank you. As a reminder, that’s star, one to be placed in the question queue. Our next question is coming from Ian Zaffino from Oppenheimer. Your line is now open.

Great, thank you. I just wanted to maybe touch upon the pricing environment a little bit more. Are you bumping into any, let’s say, elasticity, and also as far as pricing, are you able to go back into the backlog and re-price the backlog, or is most of the price action you take just on new orders? Thanks.

I don’t think we’re bumping into elasticity in general. The pricing actions are going through and customers are supportive. It’s more around demand and they want to make sure they get what they have on order. We aren’t really able to re-price the backlog; at the same time, we do limit it, so we’re limiting it, for example, if we give 60 days’ notice we’re limiting customers to buy an average usage for that 60-day period so that they can’t take advantage of a longer runway than what really exists, so we do limit it in that regard. I’m not sure, does that complete your--I’m not sure, I missed part of the question.

No, that was the question, and that was helpful, thank you. Then maybe for Milt, on the debt stack, what’s the sensitivity now as far as interest rate increases as it relates to interest expense increases, and how much again is fixed versus floating? I know you broke it out a little bit, but just remind us again, thanks.

Yes, we’re roughly 35% fixed, 65% floating, roughly Ian, and we do expect--we’ve changed our assumption, as I noted earlier in the prepared remarks. We’ve adjusted our assumption on interest rate increases from where we were a quarter ago, just given all the expectations in the markets, and so we essentially now have--we have four 50 basis point adjustments in our model, but one of them is at the end of the year, that doesn’t really affect this year, so in essence we have three 50 basis point improvements--increases, and if the economy slows and the Fed decides--I think it’s almost a certainty that we’ll see a 50 basis point increase in May and then depending on what happens to the economy it could be less than that, but we’ll adjust our model as we know more.

Great, thank you very much.

Thanks Ian.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Justin Bergner from Gabelli Funds. Your line is now live.

Good morning Eric, good morning Milt, good morning James.

Good morning.

Yes, hey Justin.

Nice start to the year. My first question relates to the general drivers of the outlook. You kept your adjusted EBITDA guide unchanged but you’re noting more material investments in advanced surface technologies, at least in terms of the specifics you’re sharing in your press release and presentation today. Is it safe to assume that within your adjusted EBITDA guide, which has stayed the same, that maybe there’s a slightly better revenue outlook but then slightly higher expenses associated with investment in advanced surface technologies, or was this sort of always envisioned to be the plan?

Yes, I think the best way I would describe it, Justin, it’s fluid and it’s always moving, it’s always adjusting. We know a little bit more now than we did three months ago on how some of the growth investments would develop throughout the year. I do think it’s safe to say that we have baked into our guidance a little bit more specificity than we had a quarter ago on the impact, so yes, there are some expenses that we are baking into our guidance that we just did not have clarity on a quarter ago. The same thing will be true next quarter - wherever we end up with on our guidance, it will take into account our latest thinking there, but it’s a good question because yes, there are some additional expenses incorporated into our outlook for the year for those growth investments.

Okay great, that’s helpful. Are these growth investments mainly a 2022 phenomenon, or would you expect them to--I mean, I guess outside of the U.S. semiconductor capacity expansion, would you expect some of the growth investments this year in advanced surface technologies to continue into next year?

Well, you hit the big one - the big one that we’re expecting is what’s happening in the U.S. semiconductor industry, so if you exclude that, the way I would describe it is we’ll always be investing in growth ahead of the growth, so there’s always going to be some element of that. It just happens to be a little bit more significant given where we are currently in the segment, so I think that’s the way I would describe it.

Okay, great. That’s helpful. Switching back to costs, how would you describe where we stand today the relative headwinds associated with the three major cost components - you know, inflationary cost of materials, labor and freight? How has the view of those different headwinds maybe evolved over the last three months?

Well, I’ll just add context and then I’ll invite Eric to jump in. I’m going to give you a little walk-through from where we were last year. Last year, we had really good experience more than covering cost increases during the first half of the year, and then in Q3 we still were fine, Q4 we were--it became a little bit more challenging, and then I would say in this quarter, the challenge was more significant overall because we’re seeing not only material costs increase but we’re seeing the effects of wage increases and continued freight increases. Now with what’s going on in China and the ports being locked up, and what’s happening in Ukraine, we think it’s likely that those pressures will continue to affect the economy, which is one of the reasons why we have not adjusted guidance, as I mentioned earlier. That’s kind of a little bit of a look back at last year and the trends this year.

Think about it this way - we implemented price increases on January 1. In the heavy duty truck market, we did it again in March and we have another announced for June 1 and the rest of our businesses July 1, so I think we’ve caught up in general other than the heavy duty truck market, and I think we’re caught up now as long as things don’t go crazy again in the next quarter. The other thing that’s happening and is a smaller effect is just a little bit more inefficiency, and it’s really just due to supply chain. Things aren’t available, you’re not as efficient as you were before, so you’re moving around the plant more often and not able to have as large runs or things like that, so there is a little bit of inefficiency that’s piled in there that’s not price. We’re trying to capture that - as supply chain improves, that will improve as well.

Great, that’s very helpful color. One last question, you called out corporate expense being up, and I wasn’t sure if you were trying to suggest this is sort of a new hire run rate or that you’re trying to suggest it’s not a new hire run rate. Then in the description, you mentioned acquisition and divestiture expenses and restructuring expenses, but I thought that’s not part of corporate in your adjusted EBITDA calculations, so just any clarity there?

Yes, I’ll take the last question first because it’s a good question and can create some confusion. Corporate expenses, when we report, we report the GAAP--you know, the total number, and it is correct that the M&A portion that goes into corporate expenses that resulted in some increase year-over-year is adjusted out for adjusted EBITDA. But when we talk about corporate expenses, we’re talking about all expenses, and so we did not exclude that for that specific purpose. Is that clear, Justin?

Yes, that is clear.

Okay, all right. Then we did have--we cited some restructuring charges at the corporate level as we reduced some of our overall headcount and expenses in conjunction with some of the stranded costs from the divestiture activity, particularly CPI, and so we had an opportunity to adjust our cost structure a bit - I would say it’s on the margin, but a bit that made sense as well, that resulted in some restructuring charge there. Once again, that restructuring charge is excluded from adjusted EBITDA, but it’s included for purposes of talking about overall corporate expenses.

Great, thank you.

Thank you. We have reached the end of our question and answer session. I’d like to turn the floor back over to James for any further or closing comments.

Thank you for your time this morning and have a great rest of your day.

Thank you. That does conclude today’s teleconference and webcast. You may disconnect your line at this time and have a wonderful day. We thank you for your participation today.