Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the NRG Energy second quarter earnings conference call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that this is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Brendan Mulhern, Head of Investor Relations. Dear sir, please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, and welcome to NRG Energy's Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. This morning's call is being broadcast live over the phone and via webcast. The webcast presentation and earnings release can be located in the Investors section of our website at www.nrg.com under Presentations & Webcasts. Please note that today's discussion may contain forward-looking statements, which are based upon assumptions that we believe to be reasonable as of this date. Actual results may differ materially. We urge everyone to review the safe harbor in today's presentation as well as the risk factors in our SEC filings. We undertake no obligation to update these statements as a result of future events, except as required by law. In addition, we will refer to both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. For information regarding our non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, please refer to today's presentation and earnings release. With that, I will now turn it over to Larry Coben, NRG's Chair, President and Chief Executive Officer.

Thank you, Brendan. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for your interest in NRG. I'm joined this morning by Bruce Chung, our Chief Financial Officer. Other members of the management team are also on the line and available for questions. Also with us, and I'd like to welcome Brad Bentley, who joined last week as our new Head of Consumer. Brad is on the call today but will not be taking questions, unless you want to ask him why he's so excited to be here. In that case, he is more than ready, and I encourage you to do so. So let's begin with the key messages shown on Slide 4. First, we delivered strong second quarter results, completing an exceptional first half of 2025. We are reaffirming our full year financial guidance across all key metrics and are currently trending at the high end of the ranges. Second, we are announcing long-term retail power agreements with a data center operator for 295 megawatts with the potential to grow up to 1 gigawatt over time. This validates our strategy and provides evidence of the growing interest in gas-fired power for data centers. Third, the T.H. Wharton project has closed its Texas Energy Fund loan. Construction is well underway, and we remain on track for a mid-2026 completion. Finally, our Texas Residential Virtual Power Plant is off to a fast start. Early results have exceeded expectations, and we are increasing our 2025 target by more than sevenfold. Turning to Slide 5. Adjusted earnings per share for the second quarter were $1.73, reflecting an 8% growth year-over-year when normalized for asset sales and retirements. For the first half of '25, adjusted EPS was $4.42, representing an increase of 48% on the same basis. Our performance was driven by expanded consumer margins, strong…

Thank you, Larry. Turning to Slide 10. NRG delivered another solid quarter of financial and operational performance with $1.73 in adjusted earnings per share and $909 million in adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted net income was $339 million and free cash flow before growth was $914 million. Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income for the quarter were down year-over-year. However, this was primarily driven by the absence of earnings from the Airtron sale in 2024, expiration of the Cottonwood lease in May of this year, deactivation of Indian River Unit 4 and higher phantom stock expense as a result of NRG's increased share price. When adjusting for these items, second quarter 2025 adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income would have been approximately $90 million and $70 million better, respectively. NRG recorded the highest adjusted earnings in the company's history through the first half of 2025 with $4.42 of adjusted earnings per share and over $2.35 billion of adjusted EBITDA, a year-over-year increase of 40% and 11%, respectively. Our exceptional financial performance over the first 6 months of this year reflects strong execution in each of our segments, driven by a mix of expanded margins, favorable weather in the first quarter and excellent commercial optimization. Our Texas segment produced $512 million of adjusted EBITDA in the quarter and $811 million in the first half of 2025, an improvement of over 13% and 20%, respectively, from the same periods in 2024. These results were driven by strong performance at the plants, increased retail margins and favorable weather in the first quarter. These contributed adjusted EBITDA of $99 million in the second quarter and $573 million through the first half of 2025. Performance in the first half of 2025 outpaced the same period for 2024, largely driven by higher margins from our natural gas business…

Thank you, Bruce. We've just completed the strongest first half in NRG history. Our core business continues to exceed expectations, our people continue to perform at a high level, and our opportunities have never been greater than today. This is an exciting time for our company. We announced the acquisition of premier natural gas assets in the leading C&I virtual power plant platform. We launched a new residential VPP offering, advanced our large load strategy and signed long-term power agreements with a data center operator. We secured a Texas Energy Fund loan, closed on the Rockland transaction and made meaningful progress across our organic growth initiatives. As my namesake, Larry David would say, keep good. We are well prepared for the balance of summer and confident in our ability to continue to deliver value to our shareholders. Operator, we are ready to open the line for questions.

[Operator Instructions] And now we're going to take our first question, and it comes the line of Julien Dumoulin-Smith from Jefferies.

And again, I got to say, another quarter nicely done, Larry and team.

Thank you, Julien. Appreciate it.

Look, I'm speaking of delivering on new and novel topics. This 295 megawatts, can you talk a little bit about the structure here? I mean this is kind of a novel subject for the industry. How do you think about the margin profile? I get it's a little bit commercially sensitive to talk about, but how do you think about this contributing to the bottom line or EBITDA? I mean is this more like a residential contract in terms of margin contribution or some kind of provider of last resort C&I kind of contract? How would you frame the economics?

In general, and we're not going to get too specific as we said, Julien, as it is commercially sensitive. I think we view it closer to a C&I contract with premium margins. That's how I would think about these types of transactions. Obviously, longer duration than the average C&I contract. But as you know, we have numerous C&I customers of this size and greater. So I would think of it as a C&I contract with a premium margin, and we have a variety of mechanisms to protect that margin, including things like indexing, hedging and a whole slew of other things that we've developed in order to make sure that, that margin over time is maintained.

Awesome. Excellent. And can you talk a little bit more about this partnership opportunity? I mean look, it's been a little quieter on that front in recent quarters. You guys have had a lot going on. But can you talk about where you are? You guys have been, obviously, Larry, actively marketed that for over a year now. I mean is there more to come beyond this gigawatt? Can you talk even about the specific sites that are contemplated in this gigawatt arrangement and what that scaling up might like look like if you think about like the timing?

When you're talking about a partnership, which one -- are you talking about the data center agreement we announced today? Or are you talking about the Kiewit part? We have a lot of great partnerships [indiscernible].

You're right. You're right. I'm thinking about it. Yes. No, the data center, leveraging your existing sites, right, the 295 getting larger, right? And is there more even beyond that as you think about your commercial activity?

Look, Julien, as I said, I think this is just the beginning. As you know, these transactions are somewhat complicated and complex, and we're working our way through it, but we're super excited about this one and super excited about the potential to expand it as well as the pipeline that we put on the right side of the slide. From a point of view of what we're going to say about where and what, as you know, even with our regular C&I clients, we don't disclose those contracts or who they are. If the clients choose to do so, we're happy to support them and confirm it. But that we feel that part of our client services, it's really up to them to talk about themselves and their plans for the data center. It would not surprise me if at some point, these folks put out a release, but I don't know if they're going to do so.

Yes, absolutely. And the 4 gigawatts of LOIs and all that as well, if any thoughts there? And I'll leave it.

I think it's great to have them. Obviously, LOIs, they're not all going to come to successful conclusion. So I wouldn't model like you like to do, Julien, 150% of that for tomorrow. But kidding, Julien, kidding.

No, no, I get it.

Look, I mean, those are things that we're super excited about. But due to the complexity, not all of them will get to the goal line.

And the question comes from line of Nicholas Campanella from Barclays.

And it's all been incentive, comp incentive. So I guess just taking a further step on the backlog, just what is your line of sight to kind of convert some of the 4 gigawatts to actual ESAs? Like are you expecting to have more ESAs by the third quarter or the fourth quarter? How would you kind of frame expectations there? And then...

No. We're not putting -- obviously, if we have letters of intent, we're spending serious time, effort and time on this. It's always difficult to put timing on it, but some of these things are in our control and some of them are not. Some of them have to do with when an interconnection study gets finished. And if somebody delays an interconnection study 2 months, there's not a darn thing we can do about it. So we are pushing -- the reason we want to have a backlog of this size is to make sure that we have significant transactions to continue to tell you about. We're super optimistic, but I don't want to predict quarter-by-quarter. That's just too difficult. And I've been in the development business too long. Every time in my career that I've tried to put out a development time line, I've been wrong. And I don't really like being wrong.

Fair enough. So it just seems like on VPP, the adoption rates are coming in better than initially thought in Texas. And just I'm curious if you can kind of -- now that you've had a little bit more time after you've announced this transaction on the first quarter, how do you think the PJM opportunity is shaping up?

I think we need to see the Texas opportunity a little more. I mean remember, it's only been about 3 months that we've been in market. And the results are great, but we want to make sure we have a complete shakedown cruise and know everything there is to know. And then we will look at certain parts of PJM that we think are particularly ripe for this type of offering. But I wouldn't expect it to be this year.

And the question comes from the line of Angie Storozynski from Seaport.

So first about the Big Beautiful Bill and its impact on -- and the tax shield it basically brings with it, that deal and the Rockland transaction and how that impacts your free cash flow per share growth trajectory.

Angie, it's Bruce. So needless to say, the OB3 certainly is a good outcome for us as it relates to those particular transactions. We're still in the process of going through the purchase price allocation and won't obviously be done with that until we close. But based on early estimates, we would expect potential cash savings to be above and beyond what we had originally assumed in our underwriting to be close to $1 billion, if not a little bit more than that, primarily realized over the course of 2027 to 2030.

Okay. That's good. Secondly, I mean, again, I was clearly hoping that you would say that there's a meaningful uptick in the above 14% FFO per share growth trajectory that you were putting on the back of the deal.

I didn't say one way or another, but we'll -- look, I mean, obviously, when it comes time for us to update you guys on that, we will do so.

Okay. Then secondly, yes, you have a big transaction pending, but we do still see some asset sale in -- especially in Pennsylvania. And I'm just wondering if in light of the fact that you have a pending transaction, does it preclude you from actually potentially bidding for other assets in PJM? You still have a relatively small footprint in this power market.

It does not preclude us, Angie. I mean I don't think we could take a bite of the same size that we did a couple of months ago. But if there's an attractive asset at the right place and the right price, you will find us there.

And then lastly, the asset that just got the TEF commitments and the other assets that are still waiting for that. I mean could we expect data center contracts for these TEF assets, either the ones, again, already awarded the loans or the future ones?

The TEF assets are required to go into the grid. Existing assets, of course, that we already have could be directed from a fungibility point of view, but you could not direct TEF assets to a data center. They have to go into the grid.

Even if -- I mean, you could have a front-of-the-meter contract, right, where the power does flow through the grid, just that...

Absolutely, Angie. I mean look, I think we can supply a data center from all of our existing plants in Texas without a problem. We simply cannot direct a TEF plan as if it's a behind-the-meter deal or being dedicated solely to a data center.

Okay. And then just one question. And again, maybe I'm confused. So what is it exactly -- what is the difference between the contract that you just signed and the other C&I contracts? I mean besides a higher margin, obviously, you're not leasing the site, right? It's not like it's colocated with one of your power plants. Why is it different than any other large-scale C&I contract?

Angie, we haven't said whether it's colocated or not. So we're not going to be doing that going forward just as a rule. So I just want to be clear, unless when our customer wants to announce that it's colocated, that's fine. I think people are willing to pay premiums at data centers for assurance that they can have 10 to 20 years of power at a price that they know what it's going to be so they can plan accordingly. I mean I think the premium is, in large part, a result of being able to sign up for 10 years.

And the question comes from the line of Michael Sullivan from Wolfe.

I had another one on the data center deal you announced today. Just any more color on maybe why the load ramp is a little bit slower than maybe we would think for something in Texas? And then I get the sensitivity, but you kind of introduced PowLan and Menlo on the last call. Like any reason to think they wouldn't be the ones associated with this?

I'll let Rob take the first part of that, and then I'll grab the second. Go ahead, Rob.

So like on this particular transaction that we announced today, this data center design is more modular, and so it comes in, in pieces. It's not -- to compare that to the things you guys are thinking about are, the 100-megawatt clips that kind of come in on like a gigawatt site. These are design -- these are edge-type data centers. So they come in, in smaller sizes. That's why the ramp looks different than what you might have expected. Does that make sense?

It does, yes.

Okay. The second, PowLan...

PowLan. Look, PowLan and Menlo are still in that 4-gig letter of intent number that we put out there. We're still working with both of those entities under letters of intent. Just things are taking -- we're not ready to announce a firm deal with either one of them, but we are still working actively with both of them.

Okay. That's really helpful. And then just in terms of how you're thinking about the cadence of updating your outlook, should we be thinking about like Q3 as a stand-alone update for just '26? Are you thinking about the long-term plan? And then when do you like officially pull LS in there? Do you wait for that to close or give any incremental updates along the way?

I mean I think you'll get NRG alone in the third -- on the third quarter call. I think until we own LS, we can't really put it into our numbers. So I would expect that to be maybe on our first -- on our year-end call, assuming the transaction is closed by then. If not, it will be on the first quarter call.

Okay. And the NRG that's stand-alone, is that for '26 only? Or you're doing like a long-term refresh with Q3?

I mean I think, Sully, we'll probably -- we'll certainly do '26. Whether we update the outlook or not is going to be a function of what we see at the time. But certainly, you'll get '26.

It may make more sense to do it after LS is closed. That's probably the more likely time, Sully. I think I just made my finance people very happy that they don't have to do a double update by the next quarter or 2.

And the question comes from the line of Carly Davenport from Goldman Sachs.

We wanted to just ask a couple of follow-ups. First on the VPP opportunity, obviously, raising the '25 target there. I guess any more you can expand on the drivers of that strength? And if you see any sort of read-throughs to the potential longer-term glide path?

Yes. I mean I think it's still early days, and so we're still early analyzing the speed of the take-up. I mean we were always super optimistic, but it's been faster than we expected, and we need to see whether this is just early start-up momentum or sustainable before we think about changing any kind of numbers or guidance. But what we are seeing is tremendous amount of uptake of the program as well as equally interesting people who are taking additional Vivint Smart Home pieces and products and putting them into their homes. So it's great cause for optimism. And I hope in maybe the next call or the one after that, we'll be able to give a little bit more clarity on what the drivers are. I'm a little reluctant to do it after only 3 months in the market.

Got it. Okay. Fair enough. That all makes sense. And then any updates to share on the partnership with GE Vernova and Kiewit on the gas assets to kind of start up in that '29, 2030 time frame? I guess how is development progressing there? And are those plants part of the discussions that you're having with potential data center customers?

Yes. I mean those -- that partnership is very closely related to the pipeline that we put on the right side of the slide there. So as though some of those letter of intent and joint development agreements advance, we bring GE and Kiewit along with us for the ones where their power would be required to execute.

[Operator Instructions] And now we're going to take the question from David Arcaro from Morgan Stanley.

Congratulations. Let's see, I was wondering just on this data center agreement here. Could you clarify, is the margin fixed over the cost of supply for this agreement such that it's indexed to the market? Or is this a long-term fixed price agreement for the customer, maybe with escalators? Just any clarity there would be helpful.

I mean we've done a bunch of things to lock in the margin, David, to keep it at the level so that we will maintain a level as if we were pricing it at the numbers that we said today. We're not going to tell people how we do that because it's part of our secret sauce. But the margin, if you look at what we put out as a pricing number and you can -- you know pricing in Texas as well as anybody, you can see what the margin is, and that margin is well protected over the course of the agreement.

Got it. Understood. Okay. That's helpful. And then let's see, a little bit related to the prior question, but just what are you seeing in terms of interest in additionality in the market in terms of the portfolio of solutions here for data centers? We've seen them go a bunch of different directions. But what's the current appetite and push for bringing additionality here?

Look, I think there's still a tremendous appetite for additionality, partly for assurance from people that they can have power and partly because grids are tight. And both of those are factors that's going to lead to a stronger and stronger push for additionality going forward. We feel very good about the fact that we have the agreement with GE and Kiewit in order to -- GE Vernova and Kiewit in order to bring that additionality to bear. We think it will be well received both by regulators and by end users.

Yes, absolutely. And you're in a unique position there. And if you don't mind, Rob, can I bug you for just your current outlook for power prices in Texas? I mean we're seeing continued acceleration in data center activity load growth from different angles. But how are you expecting power price to trend as you see it today?

So I'm going to sound like a broken record, David. The power prices, we've seen an upward movement in the off-peaks, which would be driven by kind of the support of large industrial loads, C&I, AI, all those things. The forward curves still don't reflect what should be reflected in them. And the reason for that or at least one potential reason for that is we're waiting on data points. We're waiting on load to get announced and show up. And so the back of the curve is going to see that and then move or because of the work that got done with SB6, ERCOT's forecast will start to reflect reality again. And if the ERCOT report says 200 gigs of load, the market doesn't move. If a real report said 30 gigs of load, this market would jump $10. So we still see plenty of upside in the curves in Texas.

Dear speakers, there are no further questions for today. I would now like to hand the conference over to Larry Coben for any closing remarks.

I want to thank you all for your interest in NRG and for being a part of this call. Again, we are super excited about where we stand and even more excited about where we're going. So thank you for your interest, and look forward to seeing you all soon.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today's conference. This concludes the program.