Good afternoon. My name is Paul, and I'll be your conference operator today. I would like to welcome everyone to the Insperity First Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] At this time, I would like to introduce today's speakers. Joining us are Paul Sarvadi, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer; and Douglas Sharp, Senior Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. At this time, I'd like to turn the call over to Douglas Sharp. Mr. Sharp, please go ahead.

Thank you. We appreciate you joining us. Let me begin by outlining our plan for this evening's call. First, I’m going to discuss the details behind our first quarter 2021 financial results. Paul will then comment on the key drivers behind our Q1 results and our plan for the remainder of the year. I will return to provide our financial guidance for the second quarter and an update to the full year guidance. We will then end the call with the question-and-answer session. Now before we begin, I would like to remind you that Mr. Sarvadi or I may make forward-looking statements during today's call, which are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. In addition, some of our discussion may include non-GAAP financial measures. For a more detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements and reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures, please see the company's public filings, including the Form 8-K filed today, which are available on our website. Now let's discuss our first quarter results. We achieved $1.82 in adjusted earnings per share, a 7% increase over Q1 of 2020. Adjusted EBITDA increased 3% to $104 million. These results reflect the average number of paid worksite employees in line with our expectation, pricing above targeted levels, upside in each of our direct cost programs and ongoing management of our operating costs. As for our growth metric, as expected, the average number of paid worksite employees in Q1 of 2021 declined by 2%, compared to Q1 of 2020 and included the loss of the one large enterprise account that we referred to in our previous earnings call. Excluding this account, paid worksite employees would have been relatively flat sequentially from Q4 of 2020 to Q1 of this year. It…

Thank you, Doug and thank you all for joining our call. Today I will start with some comments on our strong first quarter results and the momentum driving our outperformance leading us to raise our forecast for the year. I will follow with our view of the small and medium-sized business marketplace, including recent trends in hiring and business owner sentiment we're seeing in our client base. I'll finish my comments with how we believe we're on a solid path for return to double-digit growth and profitability. We are pleased with our strong first quarter results and the excellent execution driving many key metrics in the business from sales and retention to pricing and direct cost. In addition, hiring momentum within the client base is accelerated and appears a small and medium-size business community is primed for growth. This quarter, our paid worksite employees from prior bookings reflected our solid fall campaign sales and came in at 93% in the same period in 2020, which was largely pre-pandemic. As a reminder, sales booked in a given quarter generally become paid worksite employees in the subsequent quarter as new clients and their worksite employees are enrolled, paid and then flow into revenues. Our sales team is off to an impressive start to the year, achieving 102% of our budgeted bookings in this quarter. The number of trained business performance advisors was up 7% and this team increased discovery calls by 16% and business profiles by 21%. The number of new clients held also increased 16% over the same period last year, which is notable since most of Q1 last year was pre-pandemic. However, the average number of worksite employees per client was down reflecting the pandemic related downsizing that’s occurred over the last year and also a light quarter for our…

Thanks, Paul. Let me provide our guidance for the second quarter and an update for the full year 2021. Based upon the details that Paul just shared, including our successful start to the year and some improvement in the overall level of uncertainty, we have raised and narrowed our range of growth in earnings expectations for 2021. We are now forecasting 4% to 6% worksite employee growth for the full year, an improvement over our initial guidance of 2% to 6% growth. This increase is based upon a higher starting point going into Q2. The recent improvement in hiring trends and continuing momentum in sales and client retention. We're forecasting Q2 paid worksite employee growth of 5% to 6% over Q2 of 2020, a period which was significantly impacted by the onset of the pandemic. We now expect 2021 gross profit to be considerably higher than our initial budget based upon our Q1 outperformance and the recent positive trends in both pricing and direct costs, although there continues to be some uncertainty as we come out of the pandemic. Our forecasts in these areas includes a slight improvement in our workers compensation costs trend, lower unemployment tax costs upon the receipt of lower than estimated rates in Q1 and a benefit cost trend consistent with our initial budget. Our operating costs continue to reflect our 2021 plan of balancing our growth initiatives with the ongoing management of costs as our growth accelerates. So when taking into account these factors, we're forecasting adjusted EBITDA in a range of $250 million to $280 million, up from our initial guidance of $225 million to $275 million. As for full year 2021, adjusted EPS we are now forecasting a range of $3.83 to $4.40, up from our previous guidance of $3.27 to $4.20. As for Q2, we are forecasting adjusted EBITDA in a range of $44 million to $49 million and adjusted EPS from $0.60 to $0.70. As a reminder, our historical earnings pattern generally results in the decline from Q1 to Q2. This Q1 results are typically higher than subsequent quarters as we earn a higher level of payroll tax surplus prior to employees reaching their taxable wage limits and benefit costs are lower in Q1 and step up over the remainder of the year as deductibles are met. Additionally, the Q2 year-over-year comparison is impacted by the onset of the pandemic in Q2 of 2020 and its favorable impact in our benefit plan in the prior year's period. Now, at this time, I'd like to open up the call for questions.

[Operator Instructions] The first question is from the line of Tobey Sommer with Truist Securities. Your line is open.

Thank you. I wanted to ask what you're hearing from customers, your survey work, etcetera, about what net job growth could be in the existing customer base because I can recall just 2 or 3 years ago, we were getting, gosh, almost 4 or 5 points worth of work setting play growth off of that measure. Do you think there's an opportunity for that to come back?

Yes, Tobey, I really do. I think, what I'm hearing right now is that there's definitely a growth mindset and there's a lot of energy and business owners are ready to move on, and they're moving on. And I think there's room to recover the 8% or so the climb that you had in the average employees per client over that pandemic period. So I think those will recover, and then you'll start to get new growth as well. So we have -- we budgeted in the balance of the year for what we saw in the first quarter and move things up, some not up to the levels you're talking about that we saw back in the period you were discussing. But yes, it's definitely we've seen an uptick now in that average number beginning to move up again. And I think there's room for that to recover.

Okay. What kind of changes did you make to the traditional employment package that provided kind of such a kick start, after you did your internal presentation to the sales force?

Yes, so what we did basically is we looked at what was in the package that wasn't getting much utilization or wasn't really adding as much value as we thought based on what the customers were telling us. And so we took some of those things out, made them add ons that allowed us to reduce the price of the -- of that particular service. And by doing so, I think we just hit a price point that was more comfortable for the -- for our BPAs as they compare this set of services to our comprehensive solution. So a lot of energy around it right now. And, hopefully, we're going to build on that and really start to see that strategy make a difference for us.

Thanks. Last one for me. Could you talk about your pricing or can you kind of give us context for whatever the rate of change is versus recent quarters or years? And maybe if you could also speak to the normalization of health care utilization, and what you're hearing and seeing about acuity as well? Thanks.

Sure, well, on the pricing side, as you recall, coming out of 2019, we were or actually last half of 2019 and throughout 2020, we were a little more aggressive in pricing to make sure that we had a good balance between price and cost trend for benefits. And we were very successful throughout the course of last year in maintaining that even though as you know the cost side of the benefit program was lower because of the impact of the pandemic and lower utilization. So we continued to build in the normal trend into our pricing, and then the same has gone on for this year. So we're backing that for this year, we're in a very normal price, passing on price increases that fit with what that trend is implied over these last couple of years. I think we reported that last time, that's about 3.5% a year or so. So that's what we would have built in. Of course, we build in a little more than that in pricing to make sure there's a cushion there. So the 7% is a cost side, the 3.5% for year. So back to your second question, Doug, if you want to talk a little bit about the trend compared to the cost and utilization?

Yes, I mean, I think what we're seeing is utilization is returning more toward normalized levels, and we saw that a little bit in the prior quarter in going through to the first quarter. But still probably not up to all the way up to the expectations. I think we expect that to continue to normalize further and over the second half of the year. And we are seeing some obviously COVID costs as it relates to vaccine treatment and testing costs, which to some extent offset some of that lower utilization that occurred this past quarter. So all things combined as soon as we went into the 2021 year and put a budget together on our expected benefit cost trend. There was reasons to be somewhat cautious with the uncertainty out there as it relates to both of those factors. I think at the end of the day as it relates to Q1, our benefit costs came in a little bit below that -- below our budget. But for the full year, I think we still see things trending consistent with the budget that we put together in the 2021 costs in the 6% to 7% range over 2020.

Thanks very much.

The next question is from the line of Josh Vogel with Sidoti. Your line is open.

Thank you. Good afternoon, Paul and Doug. Thanks for taking my questions. The first one, net gains from hiring were strong in Q1. You also saw 7% increase in revenue per worksite employee. Does the higher revenue per worksite employee generally reflect higher compensation? Are you seeing more hours worked in overtime? I guess, it's just surprising to see net hiring gains, but also such a strong increase in revenue. I'm curious, are those trends sustainable?

Yes, I think most of that revenue per employee comes from the fact that we have some components that go up faster, like the health care component, faster than inflation, or even than wage inflation. But there may be also be a little bit of a mix of higher paid employees, because a lot of the layoffs were in lower paid employees. So you may have a mix change that affects that as well. And keep in mind, we make our money more on a per employee per month basis. So that revenue per employee doesn't really make that big a difference to us.

That makes sense. Thank you. Building off I guess one of the earlier questions on pricing, your workers comp program continues to see favorable trends, and you mentioned the positive claims frequency from the work-from-home status. As things return to more to normal, these clients employees go back to the office setting [technical difficulty]. Is it fair to assume that frequency can and will [technical difficulty], but also on the other side of it, as clients may install a permanent work-from-home setting or go hybrid, that should continue to depress claims activity. I'm just curious, does that change your strategy around pricing worker's comp or the dialogue you're having with those clients?

I don't think it changes our strategy any. We are watching to just see what goes on in terms of behavior changes in the marketplace, and see if that affects things in the long run. But for the near-term, it's all priced by what type of risk there is with given roles that employees play in a company. And our whole book of business is very much more white collar than blue or even grey collar. And so, we really don't have any need to make any changes there, but we're keeping an eye on anything that may change.

Okay, great. And two more quick ones. Just curious, are you still mostly remotely selling? And when you think about things getting back to normal, will it become a hybrid type of approach on your end? Are you going to go back more exclusively to face-to-face?

So first of all, we are certainly still mostly through remote selling. However, we are starting to see more requests and opportunities for face-to-face visit. So, we're hoping that continues because I think we are -- I know we are more effective that way, if this is a trust-based sale and trust is built more effectively face-to-face. I also expect us to be very proactive and how we integrate face-to-face and remote selling into our sales motion on a going forward basis. I think it makes a lot of sense to hold our initial discovery call remotely where we can gather information and do introductory and discovery call, accomplish those objectives. I think you can accomplish those pretty effectively remotely. And that also would make your face-to-face call, more effective when you -- the first time you're in the room together more specific to that client's needs. So, if you do that that way, and then maybe you can close it, maybe it takes face-to-face, maybe you can do that remotely. But in any event, I think you can squeeze the timeframe some, we get it right. And we can see more prospects, if we -- if this sales motion works. So, we're going to be very proactive about trying to lead the client to this is how we should do this. So it should take this amount of time between face-to-face in remote selling visits.

Sure. It makes sense. And lastly, I apologize for missing your prepared remarks. Did you talk about BPA hiring plans in Q2 and the balance of the year?

Yes, I think based on where we are right now, we're having our plan to add BPAs at a pretty good clip over the balance of the year starting in the third quarter. We're at the point today, though, I think we're basically saying go and push that button. And let's start getting more BPAs in as soon as possible. I think it makes sense because we're -- everything's in shape and in line for our growth acceleration. And so now you're talking about investing in BPAs to make sure that a year from now, you're getting the right level of effectiveness for 2023.

Yes. Makes sense. Well, thanks for taking my questions.

Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] The next question is from the line of Jeff Martin with ROTH Capital Partners. Your line is open.

Thanks. Hi, Doug. Hi, Paul. Hope you're both doing well.

Hey, Jeff.

Thank you, Jeff.

I wanted to -- hi. I wanted to dig in on the growth acceleration that you outlined for the worksite employee base. As we move into the second half of this year and then as we transition into 2021, it appears to me as though you've got multiple levers driving that. I was just curious, if you could kind of that which are the more impactful among them? One being getting back to selling workforce acceleration. Two, being the BPAs are more efficient and effective. Three, the sales efficiency numbers have picked up nicely recently. And four, you've got improved client retention here. I'm guessing the loyalty that's created from last year's efforts will continue to pay dividends for several years. Out of those four buckets or maybe I'm missing one, what are the most impactful to this growth acceleration in worksite employees as we move into next year?

Sure. I think in the model, of course, the better your retention is, the fewer new employees you have to bring in from new sales or even from growth in the client base. But -- so we always -- that retention number improving -- the underlying retention number without the large customer that went away, unusually large customer. An improvement of 15% in retention is significant. And I do believe that this has been driven by the heightened awareness and appreciation for the services we're providing, then a better understanding of the breadth and depth of the services and the level of care that we've provided. And so, I just think going through the next year end transition, I'm confident we will do well. We don't have those large lumpy customers that could kind of disrupt that. They just don't -- we don't have any like that at this point. So, I would say that's the first one. But secondly, I mean, the growth machine is the sales machine. And so it's very important that these -- so I gave you some info about the underlying metrics and the rate at which we're getting discovery calls and proposals, that's the pipeline and the activity levels are good, the attitudes are great and they're effective -- very effective and we're working on how do we -- what can we do to help them more and increase their sales efficiency. So, my expectations are built around hitting the metrics that we've been able to rely on in the past. We did tilt the budget a little bit, just slightly accelerating efficiency through the year. There's a normal pattern to that already. But we're hitting those basic metrics and not relying on an improvement in efficiency. We're always trying to work for sales efficiency gain, but I don't want to rely on that in budgeting and forecasting. And let that leave that to the upside. So, the other thing, though, that's given us confidence right now is the early boost from worksite employees and the client base that they're adding. And when I look at the underlying commissions we're paying to the sales staff of our customers, that insight into their sales pipeline is showing that they're doing well, and they're acting on what they're saying in their optimism and they're expecting to grow. So, 53% are expecting to add employees and only 3% expecting to reduce employees. That's a big number. And so, it's the hardest one to predict, because you don't know how many and when, and how fast you can find the right people. But generally speaking, we just felt we had to factor in some higher level of hiring than we have factored in our original budget. So, all those factors are important. And we're definitely in an all systems go kind of mindset and expecting growth acceleration in these subsequent quarters.

That's helpful insight. I appreciate. My other questions is surrounding some of your investments that you called out, your sales force investment I believe is still early in a couple year process, wondering how that rollout is going if you're seeing any efficiencies in the early stages out of that. And then secondly, if you could touch on, or elaborate a little more on your lead generation initiatives?

Sure. So first of all, on the sales force implementation, we wouldn't expect to see any benefit yet, because we're basically just completed what they call -- what do we call that, a bedrock phase where it's an amazing amount of work that has been done by a significant number of people across the company all across the company, that have helped provide the information to detail out exactly how this implementation takes place and the coding has begun. So we're right on track where we want to be on that front and pleased to be able to report that this group we're able to really deeply and detail -- at a detailed level, put together this plan, so that the whole company will be on the same page of how we look at customers, how we -- all the different fields that relate to every customer and how we'll be able to all look at the same data the same way and be able to use the data much more effectively. So we're -- confidence is up with that -- we are going to be able to accomplish that because this phase is so important. If you don't have the right blueprint for success, you won't be able to have that successful implementation. So we're well on our way, and like where we are on that front. So on your question on the marketing side of the business, we did just release some new TV ads that just launched this past weekend. I think they're really great and their help with some of the messaging about what the difference -- of what a company is able to do when we're in place in that firm and it's done in a creative way. So I'm hopeful that that overarching marketing message from the broad TV approach will provide little air cover for our BPAs out there. But that messaging is going throughout our marketing, digital and all the things that work for us to bring leads in every day. So our lead production is in a good place. We're always trying to do more. And we will make some more strategic investments in that as we see fit to make sure you pour gas on the fire and take advantage of this opportunity to accelerate growth.

Thank you, Paul, for that and good to see the momentum in the business.

Thank you, Jeff.

The next question is from the line of Mark Marcon with Baird. Your line is open.

Good afternoon. Congratulations on the results and the momentum that's building up. I’m wondering if you can talk just a little bit more with regards to the health care costs trending with initial expectations. You gave some commentary on that. But the guidance range was pretty wide in terms of like what was framed as the initial expectations. So wondering if you could just narrow that down a little bit, or give any additional color both for the remainder of this year, and then how we should think about things for next year?

Well, I think the main thing to focus in on there is of course our position in terms of battle of matching the price and the cost. And that's why we're very comfortable. We know we have built into the budget some expectation of what you'd call a little bit of a bubble of costs that may come from more utilization that was pent up through the pandemic. And although to the degree that we haven't seen -- we've seen things normalize, but we haven't seen it go beyond, what you would expect. And therefore, since it's still below that normal level, it's offset some of the extra COVID cost that we've built in. But it was modest in the first quarter. So we did come out under the expectation and costs. But it's pretty modest in this -- compared to the size of the plan. There wasn't really any need to change our view of what to expect for the balance of the year. That bubble of cost most think it's still out there. Although we haven't heard anybody yet point to specific evidence of it. But it makes sense that there's pent up utilization and possibly some deferral of care that could cause some higher cost types of care in the coming months, so I think it pays, it's we should be conservative there and we are and how we've forecasted that. But in any event we have built in our pricing to be able to accommodate that. And so now we're at that tweaking phase, again, if it's a little higher, you can build costs a little faster. If it's a little lower, well, maybe you don't have to build pricing quite as fast. So we're just in an optimal phase for matching price and cost. Still uncertainty out there on that cost side, but I think we've been appropriately conservative.

That's great. And then can you talk just a little bit more, I mean, it sounded very hopeful with regards to how WX is doing in terms of workforce acceleration and Q1. Just can you give a little bit more specificity with regards to like, okay, how uniform was it across the various regions? Were there any distinctions between the types of BPAs that were selling it more? How much did it end up boosting their productivity by having that arrow in their quiver? To what extent is the success that they're seeing filtering through to the rest of the BPA? How should we think about that?

Those are great questions and questions that I'm still asking over here. There's a lot of potential there. And so I'm always wanting to kind of dig in, and it's kind of like you plant the seeds and if you plant seeds in the ground, you got to dig them up to see if they're growing, you've kind of ruined it. So you have to kind of give this kind of thing time to really develop a bit. And because we kind of took a backseat there for the COVID period, and this is more of a restart, I don't have a lot of deeper information to really be able to pass on to you. But as we see that, we certainly will. I'm just happy, we've got momentum again, and it's on the radar is -- it was quite prevalent across the organization, I can say that, which, that's part of what you're looking for that people are on board with the strategy, and see how it's going to benefit them in the long run. So that part is good, and we'll pass on more detail as we get it.

Great. I mean, would you say that, maybe 5% 10% of the incremental activity during the quarter was on acceleration or any sort of color that just even from a small sample size?

Yes, I don't really have it broken down that way to give you anything that I would want you to rely on. So, I'd rather wait to see it, develop a little further and give you some numbers that would be a trend that you can gain a better understanding from rather than a case of one quarter and one point in time.

Got it. And then can you talk a little bit, Paul, about just the competitive environment, and how you see the investments unfolding across the industry with regards to the PEO space. Obviously, you came through and really helped a lot of clients, and you've got a lot of success stories there. So I'm wondering -- and others have expressed the same thing. So now that the economy is really opening up, to what extent can you fully leverage the way that you were able to help other companies and really show the further penetration of the PEO concept across the U.S?

That's a great question. And Mark, and I will, I believe, the PEO option really showed well during the pandemic for all the companies out there providing the service, and you've seen a better retention rates, you've seen -- there's definitely the demand for the service is really out there. But I think where we have room to increase the rate of penetration in the marketplace is just in the building of awareness. And there's, I think that's really the only thing between going from 7% to 8% penetration to some significantly higher number. So it's all about opportunities, it's about educating the marketplace. And I think as that we -- the messaging is so good right now that it's worth investing in that and I believe investment will return in number of leads at the right level of interest where you can close the business. So there's really, to me, the only impediment at this point is broad awareness. And it takes seeing customers one-by-one to actually convert them. So there's an investment to get the awareness up and then the investment to follow through on that. But we're in a good position for that. I think the whole industry is in the same shape as that it's worth investing. So maybe we'll see that awareness, build and see that penetration go up some substantially over the next several years, that would be our hope.

Our last question is from the line of Tobey Sommer with Truist Securities. Your line is open.

Thanks. I just had a follow-up. With respect to your -- the additional health care coverage that you got for sort of extraordinarily large claims. How was that experience gone, and is that something you're likely to change at all on a go-forward basis.

So, I think we -- it was a good decision to make, if you look at the economics, you pay a lot for it. And it's normally, it's kind of a trick back because you don't want to have to -- you don't want it to be bad, because your costs go up next year. But if your results are really good, then you may be spending too much money on it, but you've limited risks. So in our case, I think it's come out within the range that for the first year that you feel like it's been a good deal for both companies. So that's probably the best place to end up. We will evaluate as we go through this year. We bought the coverage at the same level, the million dollar level for this year. And we're going to evaluate whether there's -- it makes any sense to have a different attachment point at a lower level than that or not. But at this point, I think we're in pretty decent shape there. And we'll look at it as we go through the year to decide what to do for next year.

Thank you very much.

Thank you.

And that concludes the Q&A session. I will now turn the call back to Mr. Sarvadi for closing remarks.

Once again, thank you everybody for participating in today's call. We appreciate your interest. And we look forward to communicating with you in any other type of one on one or conference setting. And we're certainly here and available. If you have any questions, you can certainly give Doug a call we're happy to set up a time to talk. Thank you again.

Thank you.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect.