Good day, everyone, and welcome to Nutanix First Quarter 2026 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question and answer session. You will then hear a message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, simply press star, one one again. Please note this conference is being recorded. Now it's my pleasure to turn the call over to Nutanix Vice President of Investor Relations, Rich Valera. Please go ahead. Good afternoon.

And welcome to today's conference call to discuss First Quarter Fiscal Year 2026 financial results. Joining me today are Rajeev Ramaswamy, Nutanix's president and CEO, and Rukmini Sivaraman, Nutanix's CFO. After the market closed today, Nutanix issued a press release announcing first quarter fiscal year 2026 financial results.

If you'd like to read the release,

please visit the press releases section of our IR website. During today's call, management will make forward-looking statements, including financial guidance. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control, which could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those anticipated by these statements. For a more detailed description of these and other risks and uncertainties, please refer to our SEC filings, including our most recent annual report on Form 10-K, as well as our earnings press release issued today. These forward-looking statements apply as of today, and we undertake no obligation to revise these statements after this call. As a result, you should not rely on them as predictions of future events. Please note, unless otherwise specifically referenced, all financial measures we use on today's call, except for revenue, are expressed on a non-GAAP basis and have been adjusted to exclude certain charges. We have provided, to the extent available, reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures on our IR website and in our earnings press release. Nutanix will be participating in the UBS Global Technology and AI Conference in Scottsdale on December 1, the Raymond James TMT and Consumer Conference in New York on December 8, and the Barclays Global Technology Conference in San Francisco on December 11. We hope to see some of you at these events. Finally, our second quarter fiscal 2026 quiet period will begin on Monday, January 19. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Rajiv.

Thank you, Rich. And good afternoon, everyone. In our first quarter, we saw solid demand for our solutions, with bookings that were slightly ahead of our expectations, and continued progress with our partners. However, the solid performance of the business didn't translate into revenue within the quarter as previously expected. Late in the quarter, we saw more business than expected with start dates outside of the quarter. This resulted in some revenue being shifted out of Q1. As we evaluated the impact of this recent change in our business mix on our fiscal 2026 outlook, we now expect to see more revenue deferred than we had previously planned, driving a reduction in our full-year revenue guidance. Rukmini will provide more details on these changes in her comments. But there are a few key points I'd like to make. First, our view of the fundamentals of our business and bookings growth expectations for the year remain unchanged. Second, these changes do not impact our free cash flow expectations for FY '26, which we are modestly increasing. And finally, this is solely a timing issue, and the amount of revenue we expect to recognize over time from business booked in FY '26 remains unchanged. With that said, in our first quarter, we delivered quarterly revenue of $671 million within our guided range and grew our ARR 18% year over year to $2.28 billion. We also saw another quarter of healthy new logo additions and solid free cash flow generation. We continue to see success in the marketplace in Q1 with our cloud platform. Our most notable wins, a few of which I'll highlight, demonstrate the appeal of our solution to businesses that are looking to modernize their IT footprints, deploy modern apps and AI, and adopt hybrid multi-cloud operating models. One of…

Moving on, we also continue to make progress on our initiative to support external storage with our platform, including selling our solutions supporting Dell's PowerFlex to another global 2,000 customer in Q1. During this quarter, we also announced that Nutanix plans to support Dell's PowerStore, with general availability expected in 2026. And we remain on track to deliver our solutions supporting Pure Storage FlashArray within this calendar year. Finally, we continue to receive industry recognition in Q1. Nutanix was named a leader in the 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Distributed Hybrid Infrastructure. Our inclusion in the leaders quadrant, along with several leading public cloud providers, reflects the evolution of our offering to a true hybrid multi-cloud platform. In closing, our business performed solidly in the first quarter, including bookings that were slightly ahead of our expectations, ARR growth of 18% year over year, another healthy quarter of new logo additions, and solid free cash flow performance. The change to our revenue guidance relates solely to the timing of revenue recognition. I believe the fundamentals of our business remain healthy and unchanged. We remain focused on delighting our customers while driving sustainable profitable growth. And with that, I'll hand it over to Rukmini Sivaraman. Rukmini,

Thank you, Rajiv, and thank you everyone for joining us today. I will first discuss our Q1 2026 results followed by Q2 2026 guidance, and our updated fiscal year 2026 guidance. In Q1, we reported quarterly revenue of $671 million within the guidance range of $670 to $680 million, representing a year-over-year growth rate of 13%. While bookings in Q1 were slightly ahead of our expectations, we saw a larger than expected proportion of land and expand bookings with future start dates late in the quarter, resulting in a shift of some revenue from Q1 into future periods. As a reminder, under US GAAP, revenue recognition generally begins when the license starts, which means bookings with future start dates shift revenue recognition into later periods even though cash collections may occur earlier. This is solely timing-related and does not change the overall revenue expected to be recognized over time. If land and expand bookings had come in with the proportion of future start dates that we had assumed, Q1 revenue would have been above the high end of the guided range. ARR at the end of Q1 was $2.284 billion, representing year-over-year growth of 18%. NRR, or net dollar-based retention rate, at the end of Q1 was 109%, flat quarter over quarter. Note that this ARR and NRR are under our updated methodology that started with Q1 2026, as previously discussed on our last earnings call. In Q1, average contract duration was 3.1 years. Non-GAAP gross margin in Q1 was 88%. Non-GAAP operating margin in Q1 was 19.7%, towards the lower end of our guided range of 19.5 to 20.5%, primarily due to lower revenue. Non-GAAP net income in Q1 was $121 million, or fully diluted EPS of $0.41 per share, based on fully diluted weighted average shares outstanding of…

Thank you so much. And as a reminder, to ask a question, simply press 11 on your telephone. And wait for your name to be announced. To remove yourself, press 11 again. We ask that you please keep your questions to one and one follow-up. One moment for our first question. It comes from Matt Hedberg with RBC Capital Markets.

Hey, guys. This is Simran Daswal on for Matt Hedberg. Thanks for taking our question. So just to start with 2026? Yes. Hi, Simran. I can take that. So on NRR, we had talked about, as you said, some puts and takes there. Where we knew logos generally don't affect NRR directly. Because if you think of all the components that add up to our ARR growth, the first one is, you know, good retention, making sure we're retaining as many of our customers as we can. And then there is this expansion component, which is reflected in NRR. And then the third element is new logo, which then add to make up the full ARR number. New logos in general don't affect NRR. I think the point we had made in the past was that as our average deal sizes for new logos have gone up over time, potentially in some customers, we might be doing a complete migration of their estate onto the Nutanix platform. Even at the get-go. That doesn't happen all the time, to be clear. Right? There are bigger customers where it would be a migration over time. We talked about that a little bit in the prepared remarks as well. There are puts and takes here. Overall, we saw the NRR for Q1 as reported stabilize. It was flat quarter over quarter.

Okay. Okay. Got it. And then could you also provide a little bit more color on fed? How did it perform relative to expectations ninety days ago? And the impact of the government shutdown?

Yeah. Thank you. Let me talk a little bit about US Fed. So first, I'd say, as a reminder, we don't report US Federal as a percent of our business. Just to give people an idea. But what we have said is that US Fed has been 10% or less of our annual revenue. With the seasonal strength, of course, seen in our fiscal Q1, the quarter that we just reported. Which is fed fiscal year end. In this Q1, specifically, our U.S. Fed business saw double-digit year-over-year growth off of admittedly, off of relatively easy comparison last Q1. But we saw nice growth there. And going forward, we continue to expect a higher than historical level of variability in the US Fed business given, you know, recent personnel changes, some policy changes, of course, we just came out of the government shutdown. So given all of that, we expect some variability there. But overall, we remain optimistic on the opportunity for this business to benefit from our platform's focus on modernization, and lowering TCO, which we believe TCO being total cost of ownership, which we believe is well aligned with government objectives as well. And we have factored through all of this into our Q2 and updated fiscal year 2026 guidance. We have factored this overall uncertainty into the updated guidance.

Okay. Great. Thank you. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of James Fish with PSC. Please proceed.

Hey, guys. Look. Let's get right to the point here. If bookings came in better than expected and granted it's apples and oranges slightly, why did RPO bookings that you know, I'm happy that you guys are finally talking about RPO because I think it's a more meaningful metric. But why did RPO bookings themselves only 6%? Can you guys help us with what that bookings growth rate was? And and Rupini, it really shifted out of fiscal Q1, why does it seem that so much is pushed into fiscal Q4? Because if I look at your your commentary here of seasonality, it it means we have a pretty large ramp into fiscal Q4 versus fiscal Q3 then So help us out here.

Hi, Jim. Yeah. Thank you for those questions. So as you pointed out, you know, we've started this quarter providing RPO remaining performance obligations in our earnings release. When before we were providing them in our filings, so in our 10-Qs and K's. We believe that this is an additional relevant metric because, Jim, as you, I think, are alluding to, RPO cap bookings activity in the period. That is expected to be future revenue. And it includes a deferred revenue, which, of course, is also on the balance sheet, and it also includes noncancelable backlogs. Those are the components of RPO. I'll also remind folks that RPO is a TCV or total contract value-based metric. And so it is you know, it has it has all of the revenue, meaning it has duration in in as well. As opposed to ARR, which is an annualized metric. Now to your question, Jim, on RPO and why we saw a small decline in our backlog component, which is part of the RPO or subset of RPO, in our first fiscal quarter. And I would say that's consistent with our historic seasonality if you look at sort of what backlog does. And then there's a small component that that is not visible, which is noncancelable That is a smaller sorry, cancelable backlog, which is a smaller proportion. And so that also typically does translate into revenue. So overall, look, I mean, look at RPO. We are pleased with overall year-over-year growth in RPO. Which is 26%. In in Q1. Your second question, Jim, I think, was on the seasonality point. So when we look at the full year, what I would say is we we still see a mix that is similar to what we've seen in fiscal year 2025 last year, for example. Example. So you look at fiscal year 2025, our revenue mix first half versus second half was 49.51 And for '26, the updated guidance we just gave you at the midpoint of Q2 and full year, it's just a touch more weighted. Towards second half. So it's not meaningfully different from what we saw last year.

Good. Got it. And then I I think anyone that's been following you guys for a while you know, will recall the time frame when it was out of your control. The supply chain issues a few years ago that led to you know, what we'd all call push outs. So can you walk us through in terms of what you're seeing that's similar versus different on how we should think about this sort of push out time frame? Thanks.

Yeah. So why don't I start on that, Jim, and then I welcome Rajeev to to add in here as well. And maybe, Jim, it's it's a broad question. Right? So I start with first maybe broadly talking about three relevant factors that are related to the recent dynamics that we see. Our land and expand business specifically. So first, with the growth of Broadcom migrations, we're finding that these customers want to commit to us. But often need more flexibility to help them match their license deployments with their migration timeline. We have seen some of this in the past as noted in prior earnings calls. Although the impact then was minimal relative to our expectations. We saw this become pronounced late in Q1, and we now expect this trend to continue, which is why we're expecting more revenue than previously expected to be shifted out of '26 and into future periods. That was the primary factor in the Q1 revenue performance. The second one is a growing proportion of our business is coming through our third-party OEM partners. For which we only recognize revenue when our partners ship an appliance. Third, and perhaps more directly to your question, Jim, we don't believe supply chain shortages or longer lead times were a meaningful driver. Of the revenue performance in Q1. However, based on what we have been hearing anecdotally about component shortages, and the potential for longer lead times. We believe supply chain tightness could impact the business going forward. So we believe now that we have more refined insight based on recent trends on, you know, orders with future start dates, partner shipping timelines, and the extent to which these factors impact timing of revenue. Now with all that said, I'd like to reinforce a few important points or reiterate a few important points that we said in the prepared remarks. We believe the underlying value of our business remains unchanged. Demand and booking expectations for the year are unchanged. Free cash flow outlook is higher. Revenue is expected to be unchanged over time. But starting later. And our guidance philosophy is unchanged. Rajiv, anything you would add to that?

Yeah. Let me provide a bit more color on the supply chain aspect. I think you covered the other aspects well, Rupini. So on the supply chain, as you said, I mean, we didn't believe that supply chain constraints were a meaningful factor in our Q1 results. But as we all know, there is a big massive AI build-out being done by a handful of large companies. And that has a potential, and it still seems to be starting to cost supply shortages in the industry. Now we don't see this directly. But we are hearing anecdotally about component shortages and the potential for a long lead times. Now this could impact our land and expand business. Going forward. Renewal talent. Affected. So we are monitoring this closely, and and we have factored in a modest tightening of the supply chain into our updated outlook. Now again, in terms of looking at the supply chain per se, while, you know, again, we don't control the supply chain supply chain ourselves, but we have done a few things to help mitigate supply chain issues. I'll say three things. There are four things, actually. First is we do have more server partners now than we've had in the past. Notably, we've added Cisco as a server partner. So our customers have a choice of settlement vendors to pick from. And, you know, they can do do that based on who's got the best supply. Second, we have continued to expand our hardware compatibility list. So that we can include more existing server configurations that customers have already deployed. Run our infrastructure. If they're, for example, looking to get it with their existing software and putting our software on, we can run that more on the existing hardware that they've deployed. Third, we've also added additional external storage options. Such as Dell and Zoom Pure Storage. That mitigate the need for customers to purchase new hardware to run our software. And and finally, we also have more offerings in the public cloud including now NC2 on Google Cloud, our Kubernetes offerings, etcetera. So these are all I I think the the overall set of things that we are doing on our end too, to provide broader applicability of a software across different hardware.

One moment for our next question, please. It comes from Matthew Martino with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed.

Yeah. Thanks for taking my questions. First one for me, like on the revenue that slipped from Q1 into future periods, like how much of that was tied to customer requested future start dates versus OEM shipment timing? Versus simple deal slippage? And I guess, like, what evidence more broadly do you have that this is timing only rather than emerging demand softness? And then I have a follow-up.

Hi, Matt. Thanks for the question. Let me start. So in Q1, the revenue performance in Q1 think I I wanna be clear, was primarily related to the proportion of orders that we saw with these future start dates. And as we said, bookings in in Q1 were ahead of what we had expected going in. And so it's that bookings view, Matt, that gives us that that we were alluding to when we said that, look. We have seen bookings to come in Q1 in slightly ahead of what we had planned. And our view for the full year on bookings also remains unchanged. From before. But the primary factor of Q1 revenue coming where it did, which was within the range, and as we as we said, it was proportion had come in as we had assumed, it would have been above the high end of the range.

Got it. And then for a follow-up, just given the commentary on deal deal recognition landing in later periods, I mean, how should we think about the duration and the timing there as we kind of think about framing our models for 'twenty seven, kind of given the commentary that you expect unchanged bookings growth but a delay in that rev rec?

Yeah. So when we think about '27, think it's part of your question, Matt, which is what is this change for 'twenty six imply for fiscal year 'twenty seven, if I were to paraphrase? Your question. Look, we have given you our view and of revenue for this year. Revenue growth in '27 is you know, as in any year, is dependent on three factors. Business deferred from '26 into '27, business booked in '27, and then how much we book in '27 that might get deferred into future years. So there's a net effect that, as you can see, along with actual bookings performance itself in '27. We look forward to providing more color on that really anything beyond fiscal year twenty six during our Investor Day in April, Matt.

Okay. The only thing I'll add to that, Upani, in terms of the demand side of this equation you talked about, of course, bookings coming in slightly ahead of expectations. The other thing you could look at, Matt, also is the fact that our cash flow is fine. Right? In fact, we're actually slightly taking up our free cash flow guide. And we're still collecting cash on all those bookings mostly upfront.

One moment for our next question that is from Samik Chatterjee with JPMorgan. Please proceed.

This is MP on behalf of Samik Chatti from JPMorgan. I I just wanted to ask on the customer spending plans, we have seen hardware cost particularly impacted by the increased component and component cost. So like, does that anyway impact the overall propensity of, like, customers and terms of spending towards IT? And, also, like, if you could help us understand FY '26 guide adjusted for the timing issues. So I'll talk about the first one. I mean, I'll we about the supply chain. I think look. I mean, hardware, again, prices could change. Prices go up. Prior lead times could go up, and like I said, our you know, approach is to provide fundamentally, to provide more diversification to customers. So that so that they can try and arbitrate amongst all the hardware providers and provide be providing the broadest flexibility to run our platform, right, on run our software on, you know, as many hardware platforms as they can. That's our approach of dealing with the hardware issues. We don't control the hardware directly. Right? Now we have it to your question. We haven't seen any drop in demand in terms of customers saying, oh, yep. Prices have gone up. Therefore, we're not going to buy as much. We haven't seen that at this point at all. Rupin, you wanna talk about the guide?

Yes. So I think the question was for the full year '26 guide, what did it what would it have been if not for the timing of of revenue? And, look, I think a reasonable starting point to look to look at that is what we've guided last quarter. Which was $2.09 to $2.09 4. And our current guide is $2.08 2 to $2.08 6. And as I said, the the reason for that is we're expecting more revenue than previously expected to shift out out of fiscal year twenty six and the factors like we talked about. Right? One is this the this the fact that more customers want to commit to us but are looking for more flexibility to help them match their migration timelines with one they need licenses from us. Second is the growing proportion of our business that's coming through third-party OEM partners, for which we only recognize revenue when our partnership and appliance. And the third one, which we, you know, we really haven't seen thus far, it was not a factor a meaningful factor in Q1 revenue, is that these some of the supply chain shortage or longer lead times, were exciting to hear about. Anecdotally and which you alluded to as well.

Thank you. Oh, and my follow-up question would be, like, have you seen any increased competitive increased competitiveness across the space over the last ninety days or something? Like, overall view around the competitive environment.

I would say, nothing has changed really on that front. We're seeing the same set of competitors as we've always competed with, and we really haven't seen any any major change. In the dynamics. Like I said, I think the the migrations that we're seeing customers do onto our platform, Right? I mean, they tend to be staged over time. Right? It's not everything coming upfront. And we're seeing as as we see more of those migrations and explained, I think that's driving, you know, the customers to need more flexible start dates. Right? In terms of, you know, when they actually want to activate their licenses so that they can activate those whenever they're ready to actually do the actual migration. So that I think is is is what we've seen, and I don't don't the competitive side of the equation really hasn't changed.

Our next question comes from the line of Wamsi Mohan with Bank of America. Please proceed.

Hi. It's Ruklu filling in for Wamsi today. I have two questions, one for Rajiv. When you look at the rest of fiscal twenty twenty six, how do you see the pipeline of large deals and the impact from that? And you talked about a growing proportion of revenue from the third-party OEM partners. So Rajiv, what percent of revenue this year is coming from those third-party OEMs? And can you give us any updated expectation for revenue from Dell and Cisco specifically? And I have a follow-up for Rukmini.

Okay. So first on the large deals, second on the OEM. So look, I think we continue to see our share of large deals. At any point in time, we have a pipeline where we have a a good number of large deals with you know, this uncertain timing. And when you have these deals, larger deals, it takes longer to to to really prosecute them and a little less clear when. Right? So we don't factor in all those deals into, you know, a forecast about some likelihood of some subset of them hitting. I would say we're seeing quite you know, it's a good mix. Right? We're seeing you know, we did more million-dollar deals last year. Than the prior year. We probably will do more this year as well as we go through the year. It's still early in the year. So we certainly have the pipeline. Of several deals out there that we should be we are working currently. On that front. Now on the OEM side, I will say that we haven't broken it down yet. In terms of what percentage of revenue is coming from it. But it's clearly growing. Right? You know, Cisco has now been out there for a while, and they are continued to ramp along nicely. Dell is still early in that in that life cycle. But I think if we've now got PowerFlex on, we will have PowerStore on sometime next summer. And so in general, our alignment with Dell is getting better. And and so I would expect that to continue also growing. And we've also had historically Lenovo, although they're a smaller OEM partner. That's been there for a while, it's business as usual on that front. But I would say I would expect the mix of Cisco and Dell both to grow for us over time. We haven't quantified it yet.

Okay. Thanks for the details there, Rajiv. Rukmini, one for you. Sounds like there's a structural change in the business where more bookings going forward will have future start dates. I guess the first thing is like how what is giving you that confidence that this is a permanent change and not something just specific to the near term or fiscal twenty six. So am I reading this correct that this is a structural change? And then second and part of this question is, on Slide 10, it says that we're going to balance prudent investments for continued growth with a focus on margins. And you're keeping free cash flow more or less same up $10 million at the midpoint. Is there any risk that investing less now can hurt future revenue growth? In outer years. So if you can just comment on that.

Thank you, Ruplu. So on the on the first point you made in terms of the the change to future start date and why we think going to continue. One thing we said earlier was that one of the factors we think that's driving this, right, primary factor has been sort of this growth in Broadcom migrations. And we're finding that these customers they want to commit with us. They often need more flexibility, though, to help them match their migration timelines and so on. And so that dynamic, as we've talked about for a while, we expect those migrations to be sort of a multiyear journey for us. And so on. And we're always looking to balance customer needs with our own business goals, and so we'll continue to do that. The reality, though, is for some of these migrations, typically the larger ones, where the customer might say, look. I need these licenses over time rather than all up upfront depending on their own migration timeline. So that's the underlying dynamic around that. Second, to your question around we're keeping margins the same margin guidance the same margin guidance same as before, while we've taken revenue down relative to before and same on free cash flow. I think when we take free cash flow up, slightly, I think, relative to last what we told you last quarter. So if you think, would say, right, on the operating margin side, we we do wanna balance those two things, which is continuing to invest, investing prudently in growth while looking to to grow margins over time. Would say a few things on this. So one is with revenue getting deferred or shifted out of '26, there's some commission expense that gets deferred with that. We're also seeing slightly higher partner payments. These nonrecurring partner payments we've talked about before, they're slightly higher than what we had assumed when we gave you the guide three months ago. And then overall, we're always looking to manage the business efficiently. Right? So when I think about all of that, we feel good about the balance between investments and growth. And then, again, on free cash flow, the one other factor I'll say on free cash flow is that while we're seeing this more revenue, shift out of 26, we still typically invoice on bookings and collect cash upfront. Regardless of when the license deployments occur. So that's another thing to keep in mind when you think about free cash flow and cash collections.

Let me add one more thing, Rupini. Sorry. On that front. So when you talk about structural change, to the business, I think one element of it is structural, which is you know, more of our business is going to our OEMs. Like Cisco and Dell. And there is a structural of that in the sense that in that case, what we do is we give them our software, and then they put it along with the hardware. They create an appliance kind of model, and then they sell that. Right? So for us, fundamentally, at that point, we only recognize revenue when they ship. Right? We don't recognize revenue when we just provide the software to them, but only when they ship to their customers. So that, I think, do expect that side of the business to continue growing. Right? And that means that from the time we get a booking to the time that, you know, they we we could get revenue for that, I think. Is is gonna be fundamentally delayed. Right? And and so the more the mix the more of that we'll see.

Okay. Okay. Thanks for all the details.

Thanks, Rupul. Thank you. Our next question comes from Nehal Chokshi with Northland Capital Markets. Please proceed.

Thank you. I do have a couple of questions. First one, Rukmini, you said that bookings came in ahead of expectations. Did you actually state, how much were bookings up on a year-over-year basis?

We did not. No. We don't typically report or give you specifics on bookings. So we did not call that out specifically.

Okay. And so that that's why you were talking about the different components of bookings, those being RPO and cancelable cancelable orders as well then. Is that correct?

Yes. So just to be clear. Right? So RPO, it it captures a lot of things. RPO has deferred revenue, which is obviously coming as a waterfall from prior periods as well. The majority of deferred is is support. Ratable piece of our business, and then there's some that's licenses that are coming from prior quarters, and that's proportion that's increasing. And then we also have in RPO, the other component of our RPO is noncancelable backlog. And what I think what I was answering the prior question or the one before earlier from Jim, think, was around the fact that RPO does give you a sense of what is expected revenue in future periods. We give you CRPO as well, which is next twelve months. That is coming off of either the balance sheet or from this noncancelable So it does give you there is embedded in there is Some proportion of the bookings that we had in Q1. But did not yield revenue in Q1.

Okay. Canceled backlog, that that that you have said something about cancel backlog in one of the other questions. What what did you actually specifically say about that?

Yeah. I was just saying that there's a that's a there's a small component of cancelable backlog. Relative to the RPO number. It's small. That, we don't put out. But that's also eventually, most of it does turn to revenue over time.

Understood. Okay. Rajeev, for you, in your best estimate, what market share do you think Nutanix is picking up of VMware migrations?

Look. I that's a little hard to estimate. Right? I mean, if you look at the customers who are doing the migrations, I mean, the choices are us, Red Hat, and then I would say public cloud, which is being I I would say a minority. Right? And I can give you some qualitative color. Quantitatively, it's very hard for us to to really say. I would say, look. I mean, the proof of the pudding is we've got 2,700 customers plus who we we added last year. And we added another product six forty or so this quarter as well on top of that. And those are all customers who are doing migrations. You know, perhaps the one that might be pertinent is Red Hat. Right? And if you look at it, I think we are winning a good chunk of business of compared to Red Hat in terms of these customers migrating. Red Hat tends to be playing primarily where containerization is the main thing. Our platform is very solid when it comes to virtualization, the ability to run mission-critical workload, and the flexibility to to provide you know, both virtualization virtualization solutions as well as container solutions. We see some significant events, some of which are public. Right? So take finance informatic as an example. Large bank in Germany, all the regional banks, And, you know, for example, they had IBM and Red Hat a significant existing deployments, and, of course, big VMware shop and migrating their VMware workloads over to Nutanix. And that's just one example of a win. So I don't have an exact quantification to your question on the number, by the way, but we do believe you're winning a significant portion of those migrations.

Okay. And then, you know, with respect to this container versus mix environment, is it fair to say that increasingly organizations are looking for the modernized container only solution? Or is it more organizations are looking for a mixed solution?

Most companies that we talk to, most customers that we talk to have a mix with the majority of the rest is still very much virtual machine-based. And the newer stuff everything that's new, net new being built is being built on containers. So almost everybody we talk to at least, it's a mixed environment. With more of the existing asset being virtual machine-based. Okay.

Thank you.

Thank you so much, Suzanne. As a reminder, ladies and gentlemen, please leave me your questions to one and one follow-up. Our next question is from Jason Ader with William Blair. Please proceed.

Thank you. Good afternoon. So I think, Rajiv, what you guys have been saying is that the push outs on the license start dates are due to the complexity of migrating off VMware. It just takes a while. And we kinda knew that, but you you've been doing these migrations for almost two years now. I guess, why do you think this push out issue didn't pop up sooner What what what makes this current time period maybe special? Forget about the OEM part of the business, but just on the the flexibility question, do you think it's it's a budget issue, a macro issue, or or some other issue?

Yeah. First of by the way, to your point there, it's not entirely new. Right, Jason? We seen this in the past too. We've talked about how you know, on on some prior large deals, we've had to provide this kind of flexibility to to align with the migration timelines. Now I think in the past, there were a smaller portion. Right? Of our business. Now we've got, you know, growing set of broad migrations. Right? So and and as as that grows again, we're finding that again. There's more of this that that requires that flexibility. And that's really, I think, is the is the the infection that we saw. And and we saw this very late this Q1 as well on this front. So would say it's just the fact that we have more of this coming. Now. That's the primary driver. Rukmin, do you wanna add any color on this one?

I agree, Rajeev. I think you covered it.

Okay. Great. And then as a follow-up, for you Rajiv also, One of the comments we've heard from the channel is that you know, when people compare the renewal from from Broadcom compared to the the upfront pricing, including hardware. From Nutanix, it's, you know, it's not that different. And I know that you guys you've talked about this. But I guess the question is, should you be more aggressive on the upfront pricing to win business? And then is it is it is it gonna be more problematic on on that delta between, you know, the renewal for the customer versus, you know, the the full hardware refresh with the NAND pricing going up as much as it is. So that I guess that's that ties into the supply chain. Question that we discussed earlier. How how do you think about sort of upfront pricing and how that might change over time?

No. That's a very good question. Right? And I think and and a lot of it is also do they need to buy new hardware or not? Right? Tied to that. Because, you know, look at it from a software perspective, we're not leading with price. But we aim to be very, very competitive, right, with Broadcom. Otherwise, we will not win the account. And and especially when we are landing a new customer, I think we will be aggressive. Now I think the big barrier is they do need new hardware and they have to purchase new hardware. Now there again, that's why this hardware timing. Timing hardware refreshes it's it's a very important question. Right? So now of course, so on our part, we've been doing a lot to try to get our software to work on as much of the existing hardware. That our customers have, whether it's external storage, with Dell and Pure or even know, their existing servers that that may have running, for example, VMware vSAN or their their equivalent of hyperconverged. So so we've been trying to reduce that hardware portion of the outlay for the customer. And that will help us also for the more that we're able to do there, the the easier it is for us to insert. So those dynamics haven't changed really I think on our part, we've been working to again again, make our software, you know, more broadly applicable so that our customers don't have to go reinvest in hardware. Now when they do reinvest in hardware, by the way, I think the other point that we should not forget is that a lot of the VMware deployments 80% of it is still three-tier storage. And if they move from three-tier storage to HCI, including the hardware, there is a significant benefit. As long as they're ready to go replace their hardware, there is a significant TCO benefit there too. So so we monitor this. We look at every deal. We look at the of the customer and then decide our strategy there. Thank you. Thanks, Jason.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Mike Sikos with Needham. Please go ahead.

Hey, thanks for taking the questions here guys. I just have a quick one and then a follow-up. I wanted to add, though, just to make sure I was clear on it, for the first question. When I look at some of the guidance commentary here, and specifically the second point around the growing proportion of business through third-party OEM partners. Is the point here that you're dependent on those partners as far as their timeline to ship those appliances. Or does that default back to, again, the flexibility that these customers are requesting? And the the the heart of the question is, is there anything you can do on your side to help those OEM partners move boxes out the door?

Yeah. I'll start, Mike. It's more the you know, the the point you made about our revenue recognition is tied to when they ship the hardware, at which point, you know, then our our license provisioning is tied to that. It's less so, we believe, tied to this customer dynamic, which is why we call them out separately. Mike. It's more the ability of the OEM partner to to get the the to get the hardware shipped from their side. Then our license deployment is kinda linked to that, leading to our rev rec. Rajiv, do you wanna add anything to that or, you know, on what we can maybe help them with?

In terms of the I mean, they're not really. Right? I mean, we don't quite control when they ship Right? So it's up to the the OEM partners to to ship their hardware. And so we don't quite control that.

Understood. Thanks for the the additional color there. And then for the I was just hoping to ask an Ravini, I understand there's a complexity of layers as far as how you put the guidance out there. But if I look at some of the the the delta here that we're talking to between the bookings, and the timing of revenue how much of the if I look at the full year guidance reduction here of about $80 million at the midpoint, How much is based on what we saw exhibited in Q1 versus what is now expected to transpire as we get to q's '2, three, and '4. I I just wanted to see if there's any way to triangulate or conceptualize the different moving pieces there. And I know that's a complex one, but I again, just trying to get little bit more of a firmer understanding.

Yeah. So I think what we said for Q1, Mike, was that you know, if our assumptions had played out, as we had expected from when we gave you the Q1 guide. That our revenue for Q1 would have been above the high end of the range. And in in instead, it was $6.71. Right, which is what the reported revenue number was. So and and then that gives you a, I guess, a bit of sense of much we were expecting in in q '1 before we saw this late in quarter dynamic that we've that we've talked about here. And so that's maybe I'll leave it there, Mike. We're not sort of breaking it down more than that, right, in terms of specific quarters or so on. And then the other comment I made, I'll you know, say again is around seasonality, like, first half, second half. Where for fiscal year twenty six, if you take the first half Q1 actuals, q '2 guide, and then compare it to what second half will be, that mix is no. It may not meaningfully different from what we saw. Last year. So that would be the one other way to think about the contributions.

Very helpful. Thank you very much. Thanks, Mike.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ben Bolling with Cleveland Research. Please proceed.

Good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for taking the question. Rajeev, I I think you've touched on this a couple of times. Indirectly. I'm I'm interested your thoughts. On the progress you're making with large customers in making this transition from Broadcom to Nutanix. What you're doing to make that process easier, either you know, reducing the duration of the POC or aiding in the reengineering and the replatforming and the training. You talked about the hardware relationships. Some interested in your thoughts on some of the things you're doing to improve that process or make it easier for customers. And then I have a a follow-up.

Yeah. I mean, it's a very good question. And these large larger customers tend to have more complex environments. Right? So this typically, if you wanna go win them, there's, of course, a POC phase. And we do actually a pretty good job with the POC. It's not really a technical issue. Right? So the POC is rarely actually sticking point. So we we get through that usually easily. Num There are all these other factors that come into play. Right? The commercial relationship and the dependency that they have. Potentially across multiple products with Broadcom. Right? That's a that's a big dependency. The the hardware piece, which again is you know, we try to do, you know, support as much and more of their hardware as we can. So that they don't have to go to fresh hardware when they switch to us. The third thing that we've been working on, of course, is making sure that we can support the baby of applications that they have. Now I would say this is kind of the eighty twenty rule. We support the vast majority of applications in being certified on a hypervisor. There's always gonna be maybe a handful of outliers. That aren't fully supported. I'll give you one example. This is Cisco's unified communication appliances. And and and those until recently, were not they used to work on our platform. But they were not officially certified by Cisco. And so customers would be reluctant to run those on a Nutanix platform. But now it's certified. Right? So we are working on getting it certified Cisco officially said they're certifying it now. So that's a barrier that we have to overcome in some cases for specific applications. Then, of course, the migration itself in terms of professional services required.…

Okay. That's really helpful. And I guess the follow-up would be when you look at the enterprise footprint you are working with, obviously, AI is soaking up a lot of mind share and and dollar share. I'm interested how you think enterprise investments in AI may or may not be influencing your opportunity to go out there and capture bigger footprint. You know, they're trying to do too much at once. They gotta pick their priority. Just how you think about that. Thank you.

I mean, it's a very fair question, Ben. Mean, almost everybody that we talk to has got AI at the top of their minds. But I would just say, that it's not I mean, the vast majority of our customers are, I would say, more experimenting with AI right now than really deploying it at some massive scale. There are exceptions. There are some subset of customers that are, you know, further along the journey. But most of our customers are still very early, so it's not like they have devoted the bulk of their AI as they have spent. To AI. And so we haven't quite seen that yet. Our subset of customers. And keep in mind, our customers are in the AI native companies. Right? They are the typical, you know, industrials and financial services and and manufacturers and retailers. Who are all wanting to use AI. But still fairly early in their adoption.

Thanks, Rajiv.

Thank you. One moment for our next question, please. And it comes from Param Singh with Oppenheimer. Please proceed.

Hi. Thank you. I really appreciate you taking my questions. I have a couple. So, Rajiv Rukmini, and and sorry to harp on, again, on the migration piece, but you know, really wanna understand the impact. Right? I would have assumed that, you know, with migrations, you'll probably have larger deal sizes. Because migrations from VMware are much bigger. So that should layer on and impact your RPO in a much more positive way rather than just a seasonal you know, impact to RPO this current quarter. We really haven't seen that please if you could help me understand that. And and if it is true that, you know, you are gaining all these migrations, I would assume since migrations take multiple years, you get more and more migrations, your revenue would technically start accelerate into next year. Right? Like, this year's revenue to next year. Plus whatever else you get. So you would you you will see an accelerating trajectory to 2027. Am I wrong in this?

Yeah. So let's first start with the first question, Param. Thank you for those questions. So on on the migrations, you're right that, you know, in general, it's for the typically for the bigger ones where they will say where customer might say, look. Let's can I have these licenses phased out over time versus all upfront? And so what we're saying is that in Q1, we did see bookings come in slightly higher than our expectations. And the the mix of orders that came in with these future start dates that we saw late in Q1 meant that more of that revenue got pushed or shifted out into q q two and beyond than we had previously. Expected. And so so that's the point on around just migration and so on. Now if you look at I think you were trying to tie that to RPO. And so if I look at RPO, like I said, includes, you know, revenue waterfall, which is pretty standard. Right? And you can see in the balance sheet. And it also includes this noncancelable backlog, which what I said earlier was that in Q1, seasonally, you do expect that portion to to be lower quarter over quarter. And that's what we saw in Q1 as well. And if you look at RPO growth, it's quite significant year on year. time. Which is which is a good thing. Right? And when you look at total RPO Mhmm. Growing meaningfully over So that's, I think, the first piece of the answer. And then I think the second part of your question was around, again, fiscal year twenty seven. And why wouldn't there sort of be maybe an acceleration in '27? I think it's how you'd how you'd phrase the question. Param, so what I would…

Thank thank you for that, Rukmini. And really quickly as my follow-up, you know, strategically thinking about this, right, obviously, you know, there's an opportunity to take share from VMware here. Why not be more aggressive for the rest of the VMware business here? Know you're going through a reference architectures. But is there a way to accelerate that? Or or maybe not or you don't wanna compete in that. I don't know how you're thinking about it. On the stand-alone virtualization side and how aggressive you wanna be attacking that market. So anything you could share is appreciated.

That's another good question. I think on the stand-alone virtualization, again, we look. I mean, we have been adding. Right? And we have been investing fairly aggressively to you know, expand the support for third-party storage. Right? So we have now Dell PowerFlex, The number two coming on board very shortly is Pure. We have Dell PowerStore. And, yes, there will be more. Right? Now at the same time, we have to also balance those investments versus investing in our future. Right? Where Kubernetes and cloud native and AI Mhmm. Right, on the other side. So we have to strike that balance. Right? We don't wanna go too far backwards in time. To go support everything that's out there. We wanna support the big ones. And if you look at it, once you've got Dell and and Pure, I mean, that's a big chunk of the market. Right? And we'll probably get the other big ones too out there. So we'll focus on, again, getting sort of the big picture, big ones. Out there, and then not trying to go meet everything. And then also balance it out with investing in cloud native and AI.

Understood. Thank you. Thank you so much for answering my questions, Rishi, for Appreciate it.

Thank you, Pam.

Thank you so much. And with that, ladies and gentlemen, we conclude our Q&A session. And conference for today. Thank you all for participating. And you may now disconnect.