Earnings Labs

NVE Corporation (NVEC)

Q3 2015 Earnings Call· Wed, Jan 21, 2015

$77.60

-1.90%

Key Takeaways · AI generated
AI summary not yet generated for this transcript. Generation in progress for older transcripts; check back soon, or browse the full transcript below.

Same-Day

+1.65%

1 Week

-0.53%

1 Month

-8.44%

vs S&P

-12.44%

Transcript

Operator

Operator

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the NVE Conference Call on Third Quarter Fiscal 2015 Results. At this time, all participant lines are in a listen-only mode to reduce background noise. Later, we will be conducting a question-and-answer session and instructions will follow at that time. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to introduce your host for today, President and CEO of NVE Corporation, Dan Baker. Sir, you may go ahead.

Daniel Baker

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Thank you. Good afternoon, and welcome to our conference call for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, the third quarter of fiscal 2015. As always, I’m joined by Curt Reynders, our Chief Financial Officer. This call is being webcast live and being recorded. A replay will be available through our Web site, nve.com. After my opening comments, Curt will present a financial review of the quarter and fiscal year-to-date; I’ll cover business items and we’ll open the call to questions. We issued our press release with quarterly results and filed our quarterly report on Form 10-Q in the past hour following the close of market. Both documents are available through our Web site and the SEC’s Web site. We have also begun providing links to our earnings reports along with some less important information via Twitter at NveCorporation. Please refer to the legal privacy notice on our Web site regarding the materials on our Web sites and social media sites. Comments we may make that relate to future plans, events, financial results, or performance are forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including among others, such factors as uncertainties related to the future contract R&D revenue, risks related to our reliance on several large customers for a significant percentage of revenue, risks related to material weaknesses and our internal controls, uncertainties and risks related to future dividends and stock repurchases, as well as the risk factors listed from time-to-time in our filings with the SEC including our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2014 as updated in our recently filed quarterly report on Form 10-Q. The company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements we may make. Summarizing our quarterly results, net income increased 1% despite a 3% decrease in total revenue due to expected year-end customer inventory adjustments and we declared a $10 million cash dividend. Now, I’ll turn the call over to Curt to discuss details of our financial results.

Curt Reynders

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Thanks, Dan. I’ll cover quarterly results, year-to-date results, the balance sheet and our dividend plans. First, details for our quarterly results. As Dan said, net income for the third quarter of fiscal 2015 increased 1% to 2.79 million, our third consecutive quarterly increase in net income. The increase was despite a 3% decrease in total revenue to $6.29 million from $6.47 million in the prior year quarter. A 16-fold increase in contract R&D revenue offset most of a 9% decrease in product sales. The decrease in product sales from the prior year quarter was due to decreased purchased volume by existing customers and unfavorable order timing. As we expected and discussed in our last call, year-end inventory adjustments by medical device customers appear to have caused unfavorable order timing and negatively impacted revenue. This is not unusual and we currently expect product sales to increase from this level in coming quarters. Contract R&D increased significantly to $408,000 from $25,000 last year due to a new project. We hope this marks return to higher contract revenues. Dan will provide details on new contracts in a few minutes. Gross profit margin decreased to 77% of revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to 78% for the third quarter of fiscal 2014, due to a less favorable revenue mix with a higher percentage of revenue from contract R&D. Total expenses decreased 15% for the third quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to the prior year quarter due to a 23% decrease in R&D expense and a 2% decrease in selling, general and administrative expense. The decrease in R&D expense was due to the completion of certain product development activities and an increase in contract R&D activities, which caused resources to be reallocated from expensed R&D. Income from operations increased slightly to 3.59…

Daniel Baker

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Thanks, Curt. I’ll cover R&D contracts, patents, product development and review some of our accomplishments in 2014. Starting with contract R&D, in the past quarter, we successfully completed a project under a National Science Foundation grant to develop sensors for faster detection of food-borne pathogens. We successfully demonstrated Salmonella detection in a system based on our spintronic sensor, which was the major goal for the project. We were able to demonstrate the feasibility of each of the three key areas of the project; spintronic sensors, nanobeads with aptamers and microfluidics. We’re in discussions about commercial deployment with companies in the food industry. As Curt said, contract revenue increased significantly in the past quarter. This was due to a new R&D project with a major defense contractor to develop spintronic memory commonly known as MRAM. R&D contracts provide modest income but more importantly help us advance new technology, in this case MRAM. This new program could enhance the value of our intellectual property portfolio and help us develop new commercial products. Turning to patents in the past quarter, the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ruled in our favor and reversed an examiner’s rejection of an important patent application. The application was titled, Thin-Film Structure Magnetizable Bead Detector and relates to a system for detecting the presence of selected molecular species, which could be used in biosensors. The ruling was in response to an appeal we filed in 2011 and the application has had a long journey since it was filed in 2008. But we persistently believed in the patent’s merits and we were pleased the Board of Appeals judges supported our position. The patent will strengthen the value of our biosensor intellectual property portfolio. Also, in the past quarter, we were granted a…

Operator

Operator

Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. Our first question is from the line of Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open.

Charles Haff

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Hi. Thanks for taking my questions. Can you hear me okay?

Daniel Baker

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Absolutely. Good afternoon, Charles.

Charles Haff

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Hi. So, on the contract R&D side, the NSF grant, congratulations on proceeding with that. Is it going to go to the Phase II process now, now that you’ve completed this stage? And if so, what could be the revenue contribution from something like that and how long will it take to see that revenue contribution?

Daniel Baker

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

We’re looking at the possibility of filing an application for a Phase II grant. These are very selective grants that the National Science Foundation does. They’re held to very high standards. We haven’t filed an application yet and it’s not certain that we will. And then if we do, of course it’s not certain that we’ll win. But in any case, we’re pleased with the progress that we’ve made on this technology and we plan to pursue its commercial deployment with or without NSF funding. Curt, do you have a rough idea of the potential timing and potential funding might be on a Phase II?

Curt Reynders

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Yes. It could typically be six months from now and Phase IIs are generally in the $750,000 range.

Charles Haff

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Okay, great. Thank you, Curt. And then a couple more questions here. On the volatility in product sales, is that a function of NVE pursuing more non-healthcare short cycle businesses? Would you expect more volatility in future periods relative to what you’ve had in past periods? I’m thinking back a few years when things used to be less volatile on the quarterly fluctuations.

Curt Reynders

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Yes, Charles. Some of our customers, they tend to look at their inventory levels at the calendar year-end and sometimes make adjustments to their purchases. Customer inventory adjustments were more severe than last year, but overall our product sales are still up 14% year-to-date. Indications are that these customer inventory adjustments were completed in our third quarter. As you noted, it doesn’t happen every year but sometimes we do have those adjustments with some of our major customers.

Charles Haff

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Okay. So this volatility has been created by the inventory adjustments and it’s not really a function of pursuing non-healthcare business more now or short cycle businesses then?

Curt Reynders

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

No, not at all.

Charles Haff

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Okay.

Daniel Baker

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

But in fact I think part of what we’re trying to do is to broaden our business, rely less on the medical business. The medical business is an excellent business and it demonstrates the tremendous advantages that our products have and reliability in particular, but it can be a very lumpy business because there’s a lot of inventories in that channel. So, we have a number of initiatives to expand outside of life support business and there are a lot of reasons to do that, but one of them is that that business might tend to counterbalance or smooth out some of the variations that we tend to get quarter-to-quarter.

Charles Haff

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Okay, great. And two more quick ones here. On CapEx, Curt, for fiscal '16, would you expect that to be at a similar level to fiscal '15?

Curt Reynders

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

We’re probably at a historical low that we’ve had this year. We might be looking more in the range of – I would say the last two years were pretty low. If you go back far enough, probably more in the range of $1 million or up to that level, maybe more indicative of what would happen next year.

Charles Haff

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Okay. Thanks. And then on contract R&D with the robust performance there, would you expect gross margin then to be lower than the 80% that you’re doing now or would you expect 80% to kind of be the right baseline to use?

Curt Reynders

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Well, the more higher percentage of contract R&D that we have, that tends to, as you know, bring down the margins and we’re looking for at least out the next couple of quarters our contract R&D to be in excess of the year-over-year quarters. So, I think the first two quarters we had this fiscal year, we had a pretty low percentage of contract R&D, which tended to have the gross margin increase. This last quarter, it went down a little bit compared to the first two quarters of the fiscal year. So I’d maybe look more at where we were this past quarter, maybe a little bit higher.

Charles Haff

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Okay. Thank you. Congrats on deciding to do the dividend. I think that’s the right thing for shareholders. And I’ll jump back in the queue and re-queue for other questions. Thank you.

Daniel Baker

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Thanks, Charles.

Operator

Operator

Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. I have no one else in the queue. Would you like to continue taking questions from Mr. Haff.

Daniel Baker

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Certainly.

Operator

Operator

Okay. Your line is now open.

Charles Haff

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Thanks for taking my follow-up questions. Curt, you mentioned in the prepared remarks when you were talking about the dividend that you would be paying that out with free cash flow plus the proceeds from the marketable securities less contingencies. I’m wondering if you could maybe describe how we should be thinking about the contingency part of that?

Curt Reynders

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Well, I think maybe the best way to think about that is I mentioned a number in – the range that we’re looking at would be in the range of $3 million to $5 million on a quarterly basis.

Daniel Baker

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

I think the way we look at the contingency is we don’t want to cut it so close that if, say, receivables don’t come in or something else or some other contingency comes up that we’re in a position where we have to sell bonds or where we’re not paying receivables on time or something like that. So, our goal is to return quite a bit more than our free cash flow to shareholders each quarter.

Charles Haff

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Okay, great. That sounds good. And then just back to the product sales, I understand the order timing problems that you had with inventory adjustments and so forth and you made the comment that we should expect an increase in product sales in the next couple of quarters. Were you talking about year-over-year increases or a rate of growth that’s in excess of what you’ve done for the previous – that 15% that you’ve done in the first nine months of this year or what were you kind of getting at there?

Curt Reynders

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

I think what we were getting at was we expect the product sales to increase above the level in the most recent quarter and also above the year-over-year level for the fourth quarter.

Charles Haff

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Okay, great. I appreciate that. I think that about does it for me. Thank you.

Operator

Operator

Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. I’m seeing no other questioners in the queue at this time.

Daniel Baker

Analyst · Charles Haff from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open

Okay. Well, thank you for participating in the call. We were pleased to report increased earnings and our first dividend. We look forward to speaking with you again in May to report our fiscal year results. Thank you, again.