Good afternoon. Thank you for standing by, and welcome to Navitas Semiconductor First Quarter 2025 Financial Results Conference Call. Please be advised, today's conference is being recorded, and a replay will be available on Navitas Semiconductor's Investor Relations website. I would now like to hand the conference over to Lori Barker, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, everyone. I'm Lori Barker, Investor Relations for Navitas. Thank you for joining Navitas Semiconductor's first quarter 2025 results conference call. I'm joined today by Gene Sheridan, our President, CEO, and Co-Founder; and Todd Glickman, CFO. A replay of this webcast will be available on our website approximately one hour following this conference call, and available for approximately 30 days. Additional information related to our business is also posted on the Investor Relations section of our website. Our earnings release includes non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures with the most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in our first quarter earnings release and also posted on our website in the Investor Relations section. Non-GAAP expenses and operating margin exclude stock-based compensation, amortization of intangible assets, and other non-recurring items. In this conference call, we will make forward-looking statements about future events or about the future financial performance of Navitas. You can identify these statements by words like we expect, we believe, or similar terms. We wish to caution you that such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from expectations expressed in our forward-looking statements. Important factors that can affect Navitas' business, including factors that could cause actual results to differ from our forward-looking statements are described in our earnings release. Please also refer to the Risk Factors sections in our most recent 10-K and 10-Q. Our estimates or other forward-looking statements may change, and Navitas assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changed assumptions, or other events that may occur except as required by law. And now, over to Gene Sheridan, CEO.

Thanks to all of you for joining our Q1 '25 earnings call. Our Q1 2025 revenues came in line with guidance at $14 million and 38% gross margin. While the slowdown in channel inventory in EV, solar and industry continues to present some near-term headwinds in our business, I want to walk through a number of important recent market and product developments that I expect will set up for a strong 2026, as the market recovers and many design wins kick in later this year. In Q1, we announced the industry's first production release of a bidirectional GaN IC. As we described in our online launch event and available video, GaN Bidirectional Switches, or BDS, is a revolutionary new technology that creates an ideal switch that the industry has never seen in 40-plus years of power semiconductor developments. No other power semi device in the industry's history, across silicon, GaN, or silicon carbide, has achieved this ideal combination of capabilities. GaN BDS makes it technically and commercially feasible to reduce traditional two-stage converters that are used in over 70% of power electronics into one single-stage while enabling bidirectional energy flow. GaN BDS eliminates dozens of large and expensive components in that second-stage, resulting in size, weight, cost, and power loss improvements of 30% or more. When combined with our new IsoFast family of high-frequency isolated drivers, this chipset creates new opportunities to accelerate GaN adoption with these single-stage converters into EV onboard chargers, solar microinverters, charging and discharging of energy storage systems, motor control applications, and others. The first customer adopting our GaN BDS is in solar microinverters, and expects to ramp later this year. And we expect others to ramp throughout 2026 in a number of the applications mentioned. In addition, we announced our GaNSafe technology has now been…

Thank you, Gene. In my comments today, I will take you through our first quarter 2025 financial results and then I'll walk you through our outlook for the second quarter along with our current view on how recent market and tariff dynamics may impact our business. Revenue in the first quarter of 2025 was at the midpoint of guidance at $14 million. As expected, the sequential decline was due to seasonality and soft demand with associated remaining inventory correction. The decline compared to a year ago quarter was primarily the result of lower revenues in the EV and solar markets. Before addressing gross profit and expenses, I'd like to refer you to the GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations in our press release earlier today. In the rest of my commentary, I will refer to non-GAAP measures. Gross margin in the first quarter was 38.1%, which was down sequentially compared to 40.2% in the fourth quarter, primarily due to less favorable market mix. In the first quarter, we executed on further synergies and operational efficiencies associated with prior acquisitions and we reduced operating expenses sequentially to $17.2 million, which is ahead of scheduled cost reductions. Operating expenses were comprised of SG&A expenses of $8.3 million and R&D expenses of $8.8 million. Consolidating certain support and engineering functions and sites and further streamlining the business demonstrates our ability to balance operational efficiency while we continue investing in next generation GaN and SiC technology and in market developments primarily in the data center, EV, and mobile sectors. Adding all this together, the first quarter 2025 loss from operations improved sequentially to $11.8 million from $12.7 million in the fourth quarter 2024, with cost reductions more than offsetting quarter-over-quarter revenue decline. Our weighted average share count for the first quarter was 188 million shares. Turning…

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Ross Seymore with Deutsche Bank. Your line is open.

Hi, guys. Thanks. I'm going to ask a couple of questions. Gene, I guess, the first one is on the visibility into the second-half. And generally, the $450 million of design wins you talked about, any change in the timing or magnitude of those? I just hope you could kind of walk us through in a general sense. I know visibility is probably still somewhat limited in the second-half, but in a general sense, how you see those rolling out as we look into the second-half of this year and then 2026?

Oh, yes, definitely. Thanks for your question, Ross. And it's worth repeating the $450 million design wins was pretty extraordinary last year. Our focus this year is on converting those from wins to production orders. As a reminder, that's lifetime revenue, so it can span from one year on mobile to maybe a few years on the high-power markets. And that revenue kicks in over three years, either late this year, a good percentage of late this year, the vast majority in 2026 and a little bit of them in 2027. So, it does depend on the start time and the ramp time of them all. But we have a good outlook to converting those design wins into purchase orders, which is why we feel, despite some headwinds in the overall semiconductor downturn, a little bit of unknowns here with tariffs, as Todd described, we feel good about driving solid growth late in the year and setting up a really strong 2026, largely because of those design wins, which we expect will actually accelerate with some of the technology announcements we made in Q1.

Then I guess, one for Todd on the profitability side of things. Anything change as far as how long you're planning to stick at kind of the $15.5 million on the OpEx side and the goal to reach EBITDA, break-even sometime? I guess, the timing might be a little bit different, but the revenues are kind of going to be in, I guess, the mid to upper 30s per quarter. Is that still the bogey, and anything has changed on that front?

Yes, nothing really has changed there. We're still tracking to that target of $15.5 million on OpEx and expect to stay at those levels. And then, as we mentioned in the prior call, we're still tracking to that break-even in the high 30s, which we expect to happen in 2026.

Got it. Thanks, guys.

Thank you, Ross.

Our next question comes from the line of Jack Egan with Charter Equity Research. Your line is open.

Great. Thanks for taking the questions. So, because Navitas, there's a lot of applications like Automotive and Data Center that can use both silicon carbide and/or GaN, I was just curious, how do your total design wins and pipeline break down between the two materials? I mean, is it similar to how your actual revenue is today where it's predominantly GaN, or is it a bit more balanced?

Yes, great question, Jack, and that's a really important point because EV, specifically onboard chargers, are really ideal for a combination of silicon carbide in the first stage, GaN in the second stage. Almost identical situation for AI data centers, ideal, in fact, the 12 kilowatt, the 8.5 kilowatt. Almost all of our designs are using silicon carbide in the first stage for PFC, gallium nitride, where you want to go kind of screaming fast and high efficiency in that second stage. And then, we're really growing nicely silicon carbide into more commercial EV, higher power industrial. I really highlighted the high reliability, high voltage, and high power capability of our silicon carbide that's winning in its own right in certain high power markets, just like GaN is doing really well in the low power markets like appliance and the mobile, of course, as our traditional strength. So, when you apply that back to the pipeline, and it was $2.4 billion last year, $450 million design wins, lifetime wins. While we don't break it out by GaN, it's very well balanced between the two. It's going to vary, of course, by segment, but it's quite well balanced and not at all indicative of the near-term revenue split where we've seen that silicon carbide drop because of the industry slowdown and pockets of channel inventory, while GaN is kind of at all-time high. So, we see them much more balanced going forward based on that pipeline.

Okay, that makes sense. And then, I noticed that R&D declined quite a bit where SG&A was actually up, or MG&A was up a bit in the quarter. I mean, could you just discuss that a bit? Is that going to limit your ability to invest in next-generation tech at all?

Q1 was, I think, if you look at Q1 in a nutshell, SG&A is a little bit higher as we have one-time expenses related to sort of the cost reductions and audit fees. So, that's not our typical spend there. I think as you look forward into 2025 compared to 2024, you're going to see that split being around 55% R&D versus 45% SG&A. So, there shouldn't be a change in our split. We're just bringing the levels down proportionally from where we were before.

Okay, great. Thanks for clearing that up.

Next question comes from the line of Jon Tanwanteng with CJS Securities. Your line is open.

Hi, good afternoon. Thank you for taking my questions. I was wondering if you could give us a little bit more specific details on your exposure to China, maybe the ASP per unit you're selling into China, and if the tariff situation has been enough to cause customers to maybe dial back their plans or pause them or maybe even try to, I don't know, second source or design you out of prior design wins.

Yes, yes, thanks, Jon. Well, first, as Todd described on the GaN, we don't see much risk or impact. Taiwan manufacturing isn't a target or impacted by China tariffs. Our U.S. exposure there is pretty small, even if there was an eventual Taiwan tariff to kick in. So, I think the conversation is mainly around silicon carbide. As Todd described, silicon carbide today is a minority of our total revenue, but a majority of that minority, if you will, is silicon carbide shipping into China. So that's where the rest could be. Actually, the country of origin today defined by China tariffs is based on the packaging location. We have a very strong China-for-China strategy that I think serves us really well in these geopolitically complicated times. Most of our packaging is in China. So, as it's literally defined today, we shouldn't be exposed to tariffs and we're not having an immediate impact to tariffs. There is speculation, though, that if that country of origin should change to fab location, that could have an impact because our fab location is U.S. So, that's a little speculative, and that's why we emphasize it's dynamic. We're keeping an eye on it. Maybe it could have an adverse impact later in the year. Well, that's really what we're trying to judge. The flip side of that is actually a really good strength. We have U.S. country of origin manufacturing in the United States. That's a strategic region. We see a lot of growth in the future, and there, not only will we be avoiding tariffs, we see that as a really positive for U.S. customers.

Got it. Thanks, Gene. And maybe just to expound on the subject a little bit more in looking forward, but let's say the tariffs stay in place or they stayed fairly high. Is there any plans out on the horizon to maybe expand your foundry base to other places where you can produce SiC outside of the U.S., or again inside?

Yes, that's exactly right. Nothing to formally announce, but we have things well underway that could move us into different territories should that kind of worst case scenario happen that would work around those China tariffs over time.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Thanks, Jon.

Our next question comes from the line of Madison de Paola with Rosenblatt Securities. Your line is open.

Hi, guys. Could you guys just provide some more color on the traction that you're seeing in the data center vertical?

Yes, definitely, Maddie. Thanks for the question. We've come a long way from 2.7 kilowatts to 3.2, 4.5, most recently 8.5 and now today for the first time announcing 12 kilowatt, the details of which will be fully rolled out at Computex later this month. So, that's a lot of progress. On the one hand, we've been pleased that a lot of customers have adopted GaN or silicon carbide, even when they didn't really have to for performance reasons. I think even at the lower power levels, you don't have to have GaN or silicon carbide. Some have tried it out because they know that's the future and they better get on with learning the design, maturing the design, proving it out in their production. A lot of Blackwell has gone to production with 4 to 5 kilowatt designs. Many of those can be done with silicon today. Again, you don't have to have aluminum nitride and silicon carbide. So, I think that's probably slowed down what we hope to be a bigger ramp this year. On the other hand, once you get to 8.5, I think that's a real turning point; very, very difficult to design the 8.5 kilowatt with the density, with the efficiencies that are required without going to GaN and silicon carbide. And I would venture to say impossible to deliver the 12 kilowatt that we just announced without GaN and silicon carbide technologies and even uniquely ours, arguably. So, I think that gives you some color. I also mentioned the other way to look at this is rack power, not just the power supply itself. Each one of these power supplies I'm talking about, you can put six across the shelf or tray. Then you can have multiple shelves assigned to power. The rest of the rack or the rest of the shelves would go towards the processing, Blackwell, et cetera. So, while some of the Blackwells have started with 4 or 5 kilowatts, that might get you to a 50 or 100 kilowatt type of rack power. But if you listen to NVIDIA and anybody else where this is headed, we're very quickly going to 250 to 400 to 500 kilowatts and then maybe headed towards a megawatt over the next few years. Those are pretty crazy numbers. And it's hard to imagine achieving those without going to at least 8.5 kilowatt and now I think, frankly, 12 kilowatt, which, as I said, gets you really close to that half a megawatt. So, I think that sets us up really well for any new Blackwell or Blackwell Ultra designs. And of course, really well-positioned for Rubin, which would come late next year.

Okay, great. Thanks for taking my question.

Yes, thank you, Maggie.

[Operator Instructions] We will take our next question. It comes from the line of Richard Shannon with Craig-Hallum Capital Group. Your line is open.

Great. Thanks, Gene and Todd, for taking my questions. I guess I'll ask the first one on solar. Kind of a multi-parter here, can you give some better sense of when you're expecting to see this ramp at some point later this year? And as I recall, at least in the past when we've talked about this, this has been a design you expect to be multi-source. Maybe you can discuss where your position there is. And then, lastly, are you seeing any other microinverter customers moving towards scan and a possibility using Navitas?

Yes, yes. Thank you, Rich, for bringing it up. We didn't put a spotlight on it too much, but number 1, it's super exciting to see GaN going into three new markets in the next 12 months. AI data centers already ramping. Solar microinverters in particular, as you pointed out, ramping the second-half of the year, GaN going into EV early next year. So, we've got quite a sequence of events and opening up new mainstream markets. And not only is microinverters adopting GaN, it's adopting GaN bidirectional switches, which is, as I highlighted, really the most ideal switch the industry's ever seen. It can handle high currents and high voltages, delivering those currents and blocking those voltages inherently in both directions, but does it with super high frequency and high efficiency of GaN. That's pretty exciting stuff and makes a ton of sense for microinverters. So, yes, those are still on track for the second-half. We are seeing Q3 ramp a little lower than expected. More of that revenue starts in Q4 and the really big numbers are next year. I think we feel good. It will be multi-sourced, as you pointed out. Those final commercial negotiations are not done. They'll be done over the next quarter. But I think we feel good about our position being the first GaN bidirectional switch actually production-released in Q1, as I highlighted. That's another major first. We've got a really important advantage in our proprietary substrate clamp, which makes the part really reliable and really robust. So, I think all that positions us well to take a good share and ramp that up, as expected, late in the year. And again, pretty big numbers next year. We already have other microinverter companies that have approached us in the last six months starting new designs. I don't think any of them will get to production this year, but I expect to see other solar microinverter guys starting next year. And to the broader message, GaN BDS, again, will go into EV onboard chargers and other energy storage systems. And I think we'll see some of those going into production next year as well.

Okay. Thanks for that, Gene. My follow-on question here is just kind of getting a top-down understanding here of dollar growth as we go over the next year, year-plus. You kind of pick your time frame in 2026 as some of these new applications develop. But if we look at EV, solar, industrial, and I'm probably forgetting any other data center, like, is there ones that have a more disproportionate contribution to the dollar growth from the starting point of the second quarter?

Yes, it's a good question. Certainly, if you look at the pipeline, you look at the design wins. I know we didn't break it down in incredible detail, but it's really well distributed. I mean, solid wins. We gave the total $450 million of lifetime wins last year. That was pretty solidly distributed. We had 40 wins in data center. That's now up to 75 in total, as I mentioned in the call. We had 40 wins in EV e-mobility. We had 28 in appliance industrial. We actually had 100 in solar and energy storage, the biggest being that GaN BDS for solar micro converters, and another 180, which has a long tail, in the mobile consumer. So, they all have different dollar values, of course, but it points to the diversity. So, it's really hard to pick one. Clearly, we put a strategic focus on mobile, EV, and AI data centers, so I think those are the three that are going to be the biggest drivers, but you've got to give a lot of credit to that solar micro converter, which is going to be material. It's kind of the fourth driver for next year. So, hard to pick one to be far above the others; certainly, we expect the new markets to be growing even faster than mobile, which is why we expect greater market diversification next year and commensurate regional diversification as we continue to grow outside China faster with some of these other regions. So, hopefully that gives you a little color, recognizing, of course, we're not predicting next year's revenue or how that would break out by market or technology.

I just want to get a general sense, and that's very helpful, Gene. That's all for me. Thank you.

All right. Thanks, Rich.

Next question comes from the line of Jack Egan with Charter Equity Research. Your line is open.

Thanks for taking the follow-up. I was hoping you could update us on the at-the-market offering that was announced at the end of the March quarter. Your cash burn was about the same rate as it was last quarter. So, did you actually execute the offering, or was it just to have it on hand in case you need it? And then, will it be for anything in particular, or is it just to give Navitas more runway?

Yes. No, that's a great question. Correct. So, we have the offering out there. We have not executed upon it. It's there in case we want to use it for strategic reasons if we need some extra strategic capital. As you notice, our cash usage in Q1 was only $11 million, and we have $75 million on our balance sheet, so that provides us quite a runway going forward, seven-plus quarters, if we maintain this level. But as we expect revenue to grow in the second-half towards the end of the year, we expect our cash usage to go down. So, right now, we are just having the ATM out there for strategic purposes.

Okay, great. That's helpful. And then, I guess I'll just get a quick second one here. With bidirectional GaNs, which is ramping this year, Gene, could you just give us a general sense of the total revenue potential for next year for bidirectional GaN?

Yes. Again, we're not guiding, but certainly, revenue potential, I would certainly put it north of $10 million. I think that's a conservative view across the different applications and things. It's pretty dynamic. Obviously, it's new. We've got over a dozen new opportunities. Many dozens have been sampled. So, it's definitely growing by the day. I would put it certainly north of double-digit millions for next year.

Okay, great. Thanks, Gene.

Thanks, Jack.

Our next question comes from the line of Joe Moore with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Great. Thank you. Going back to the AI data center, I guess I just wanted to understand the timing. It seems like when you say Blackwell designs from here could use your technology. I would think a lot of the Blackwell current generation designs are done already. Just give us a sense for how that can layer in and how much of this is more of a Rubin play.

Yes, definitely, Joe. We're seeing a lot of different configurations, a lot of ongoing new Blackwell designs. Obviously, people have not moved on to Blackwell Ultra and Rubin sometime next year. So, we still see a lot of opportunity to intersect into Blackwell. Case in point, we had 40 wins last year. It's now up to 75, including things that are already starting to ramp minimally here in the first-half, including that 40 wins from last year. We see a lot of different configurations. It's still pretty dynamic. How many Blackwells are you going to put in the rack? How much do you want to upgrade that rack from 50 kilowatts to 100 or 100 to 150? And how much do you want to move away from traditional power supply designs that use silicon that might be 3, 4, 5 kilowatts to where you're pushing to 8.5 or now 12 kilowatts, which are inevitably going to use GaN and silicon carbide. I think it's quite dynamic. We still see a lot of opportunities for intersection with Blackwell. I think it'll grow from there to Ultra, and then I'm sure we'll see even better opportunities with Rubin.

Great. Thank you. And then, just going back to the balance sheet question you were just asked, in terms of there's a scenario where revenue picks up quite a bit, and you're fine, I guess, if we remain in a tariff malaise, things like that. Can you talk about contingency plans and the ability to improve the cash burn under different revenue scenarios?

Yes. Right now, we're keeping our cash pretty tight on the working capital elements there. Because of that and because of the reduction in OpEx, we're able to keep that cash really much smaller going forward, and we expect that to happen in a slower growth element, as well as an accelerated growth in Q4. We really don't see any concerns there today, given our cash levels and our ability to keep our working capital in check.

Great. Thank you.

Thanks, Joe.

We have a follow-up question from Ross Seymore with Deutsche Bank. Your line is open.

Hi, guys. Let me ask a follow-up. Just wanted to talk about the inventory burn in the general market, we've heard some green shoots from some of the industrial-led markets. Just, Gene, what's your view on the level of inventory in the channel for you? Are you seeing that starting to normalize so you could get growth? More the cyclical side of the equation than the company-specific design wins.

Yes, definitely, Ross. Certainly, it was more broad spread last year, and this is mainly a silicon carbide phenomena. The three markets slowed down simultaneously with a lot of capacity coming on, and it happened relatively quickly, creating a decent amount of widespread silicon carbide inventory in the channels throughout the globe. Now, we've talked about really specific pockets of silicon carbide inventory. It's definitely declined. We're seeing good sell-through and healthy channel inventory in many parts of the world, but we're still not there yet. We're not in the healthy place. We think it's a quarter or two away where I think this remaining overhang is behind us and just adds to our bullishness for resuming growth not only on silicon carbide but, of course, continuing growth on GaN later in the year.

Got it. Thank you.

Thanks, Ross.

And our last question comes from the line of Quinn Bolton with Needham. Your line is open.

This is Nick Doyle. I'm for Quinn. Thanks for taking my question. I just wanted to know how your customers are looking at the smartphone market in terms of unit growth in 2025, and how does that compare to your own mobile outlook? And really, have you seen any signs of pull-in or push-out related to tariffs? Thanks.

Yes, thanks, Nick. Yes, thanks for bringing it up. We obviously didn't put a spotlight on mobile. It continues to be an important, stable, and growing part of our business. Last year, we estimated the adoption rate around 10% globally. Of particular note, Xiaomi and Oppo jumped up quite a bit. I think they doubled their GaN adoption to around 30% of all of their phones, being with GaN, as they are pushing the power levels to 65 watts and higher, faster than the rest of the regions and suppliers. We think that same trend continues to suppliers around the world. We don't see huge jumps up this year. We got reflected that in our outlook. But mobile is prior dynamic. So, I think the end market, to your question, the end market is not growing a ton, and it doesn't need to, which, more than -- smartphones growing 2% or 5%, we want to know when are they going to double their GaN line-up to go from 10% share to 20%, or 20% to 30%. And this is never going to happen. At least for all chargers, we believe [technical difficulty] -- and higher, especially where we're in a very strong leadership position at 65 watts and higher. So, it's dynamic. I think the trends are strong. If we can confirm big jump ups later on the year, that would only add to our bullish outlook for resuming more solid growth later on in the year.

Thanks. As a follow-up, you talked about a channel slowdown in EV, industrial and ESS, is that more demand-related, or are we still seeing positive inventory like you kind of talked about earlier? Thanks.

Yes. Nick, I think it was a combination of both. And the typical semiconductor stuff, I mean when the classic semiconductor downturn, silicon carbide, like, a lot of things were growing like, crazy. They we in short supply. Once all the semiconductor capacity kicks up, the demand slows down. It's kind of a double-whammy. And it's hard for the entire industry to adjust quickly, and you get these inventory overhangs or channel inventory accesses. And then, the whole industry has got to work on working through those. And I think when you're at the end, as I said earlier, a quarter or two to go, and hopefully that's completely behind us.

Thank you.

Thank you, Nick.

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes the question-and-answer session. Thank you all for joining, and you may now disconnect.