Yes. No, it's a good question. We're -- as I indicated in my prepared remarks, we're really early in the process, Insoo. And if you've looked at other rate cases, and specifically, in Oregon, this is not an unusual pattern that when the first round of testimony comes out from staff and, to some degree, interveners, it has a lot of items in there that, over the period of time, will hopefully be reconciled. And it's normal items. The good news is, on our rate case, it's a fairly straightforward rate case. It's really more about rate based and expenses. There's not a lot of policy-level items in there. So typically, with the first round of testimonies come out, people are questioning CapEx, and they're questioning rate-based levels, they're questioning expense levels. And we're just, right now, in the process of going back and making sure people understand this is the numbers we filed, this is the level of rate base we have, this is why it's in the rate case and things like that. So at this juncture, it's fairly early. It's obviously -- we'd like it to be going a little bit quicker than it already is, but this is just part of the process that you go through. And we'll continue to move through and work through the parties, which include meetings this week and continue the process. And hopefully, our goal, frankly, would hopefully be able to settle. But in the event that we can't settle, then we'll go to full route as we have in the past with the commission.