Welcome, and thank you for joining Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation's Fourth Fiscal Quarter and Full Year 2025 Conference Call. Today's conference call is being recorded. I'll now turn the call to Clark Koury, OCSL's Head of Investor Relations.

Thank you, operator. Our fourth quarter and full year 2025 earnings release, which we issued this morning, along with the accompanying slide presentation, can be accessed on the Investors section of our oaktreespecialtylending.com. Before we begin, I want to remind you that the comments on today's call are forward-looking statements reflecting current views with respect to, among other things, future operating results and financial performance. Actual results could differ materially from those implied or expressed in the forward-looking statements. Please refer to the relevant SEC filings for a discussion of these factors in further detail. Oaktree undertakes no duty to update or revise any forward-looking statements. I'd also like to remind you that nothing on this call constitutes an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to purchase any interest in any fund. Investors and others should note that OCSL uses the investor section of its corporate website to announce material information. The company encourages investors, the media, and others to review information that it shares on its website. Now I will turn the call over to Matt Pendo, president of OCSL.

Thank you, Clark, and thank you all for joining our call today. I'll begin the call with an overview of our results for the fiscal year and fourth quarter. Armen Panossian, our CEO and co-CIO, will then share commentary on the current market environment. And Raghav Khanna, our co-CIO, will provide details on our portfolio and investment activity. Christopher McKown, our CFO and treasurer, will then review our financial results before we open the call for questions. The 2025 reflected steady improvement for OCSL, even as the macro environment remained choppy. As we will discuss in more detail, our team worked hard to turn around non-income producing positions, find interesting investment opportunities, and reduce our cost of capital. In the fourth quarter, we achieved adjusted net investment income of $0.40 per share, up from $0.37 the prior quarter. This sequential improvement reflects the return to more normalized prepayment fees, higher dividend income, and lower interest expense from our refinancings earlier this year, and lower base rates. Additionally, we continue to make progress reducing our nonaccruals, a key strategic focus. At year-end, nonaccruals were 2.8% of the portfolio measured at fair value, down 20 basis points from the third quarter and down 100 basis points from last year. Last week, the board approved a dividend of $0.40 per share for the quarter, consistent with our dividend policy, and fourth quarter earnings. While the Federal Reserve September rate cut did not affect fourth quarter earnings, lower base rates will impact net investment income in December. As we've said before, we have several levers at both the corporate and JV levels to help offset lower base rates and support net investment income. First, we can prudently increase balance sheet leverage to enhance earnings power and deploy capital into interesting investment opportunities. Our balance sheet is conservatively levered at 0.97 times and provides us with ample financial flexibility. Second, we can continue to optimize our JV. Finally, reducing nonaccruals and equity positions will improve our earnings power. We have line of sight into, one, putting a portion of our previously nonaccruing loans onto accrual status, two, monetizing a portion of our nonaccruals, and three, monetizing equity positions. Any proceeds we receive from realizations of nonaccruals and equity will be reinvested into income-generating assets. On an ongoing basis, we will continue to evaluate these levers and their potential contributions to earnings and our dividend. Now I will pass the call over to Armen for an update on the market environment.

Thanks, Matt. Turning to the current market environment, we see many conflicting themes. Private credit deal flow showed modest improvement during the quarter, although the overall quality of deals was mixed. We continue to see a steady supply of high-quality opportunities, alongside an increasing number of lower-quality deals coming to market. Sponsors are pursuing dividend recapitalizations more often as exit activity remains subdued compared to historical levels. Momentum in Europe slowed relative to what we observed in our third quarter given ongoing political and economic uncertainty. But we still see some interesting deal flow from that region. Ample liquidity in the broadly syndicated loan and private debt markets has driven sponsors to dual track financings. We have seen an increasing share of $1 billion plus LBOs opting for the broadly syndicated market and the tightening of the illiquidity premium. However, since the Fed rate cut in September, we have witnessed slightly more price discipline and are cautiously optimistic that private credit spreads have bottomed out at SOFR plus $4.50. PIK and looser covenants remain popular tools for private debt managers to win mandates and allocations, but we remain extremely disciplined in our credit documentation and acceptance of PIK. As a percentage of total investment income, PIK was 6.4% at quarter end. We prefer to use PIK judiciously and in situations such as financing a high ROE project or carve-out acquisition that requires the PIK option only for a defined period, after which a project or acquisition generates the necessary cash flow to cover the debt's full cash interest payment. Despite a mixed environment, our long-term outlook on private credit remains bullish. Issuers continue to value the speed and assurance of deal execution with a sophisticated partner. For investors, we think private debt will continue to deliver a premium spread relative to other floating rate asset classes and with lower volatility. To talk more about our portfolio and new investments, I will turn it over to Raghav.

Thanks, Armen. I'll start with a review of our investment activity in the fourth quarter. Our pipeline improved during the quarter, yet given heightened competition and tighter spreads, as Armen mentioned, we are taking a highly selective approach to new investments. We continue to prioritize senior secured loans to market-leading businesses with durable fundamentals, reliable cash flow, and strong downside protection. At the same time, we are focused on diversifying the portfolio, avoiding industry concentration risk, and limiting exposure to more cyclical sectors. Turning to origination and repayment activity for the quarter, new funded investment commitments, including drawdowns from existing commitments, amounted to $120 million, up 54% from the prior quarter. Prepayments from exits, other paydowns, and sales were $177 million. And the weighted average spread on deployments during the quarter was approximately SOFR plus 570. First lien loans represented 88% of our new originations. One notable investment during the quarter was Walgreens Boots Alliance, an integrated healthcare pharmacy, and retailer with a 170-year heritage. The company was taken private by Sycamore Partners for over $20 billion, and the sponsor subsequently split the conglomerate into four operating businesses. Each segment required its own bespoke lending solution, and the sponsor got lenders who could move quickly to underwrite the distinct challenges and transformation opportunities of the retail and pharmaceutical businesses. Oaktree strategies worked collaboratively to consider various capital structures. Ultimately, Oaktree funds acted as joint lead arranger for the $2.5 billion first in, last out, first lien term loan to support the US retail business. The FILO was priced at SOFR Plus 700 with 2.5 points of OID, which is attractive for the industry risk and complexity of the deal. Oaktree's deep expertise in inventory appraisal and long track record of investing in FILOs made us comfortable with the collateral coverage…

Thank you, Raghav. In our fourth fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2025, we delivered adjusted net investment income of $35.4 million or $0.40 per share as compared to $32.5 million or $0.37 per share in the prior quarter. The increase for the quarter reflects the return to normalized levels of fee income and interest expense following the one-time items that impacted the results in the third quarter. NAV per share was $16.64, down from $16.76 in the third quarter due to unrealized depreciation on certain debt and equity investments. Adjusted total investment income increased to $76.9 million compared to $74.3 million in the third quarter, primarily driven by higher prepayment fees and dividend income. Net expenses declined modestly compared to the third quarter. Interest expense decreased due to the refinancing of our syndicated credit facility completed earlier this year and lower reference rates. Additionally, as you may recall, our June results were impacted by noncash and nonrecurring interest expense related to the acceleration of deferred financing costs primarily in connection with the termination of the Citibank SPV facility. The weighted average cost of borrowings was 6.5% at September 30, down from 6.6% in the third quarter. Further, we waived approximately $1.9 million in incentive fees as a result of our total return hurdle. Our leverage ratio at quarter end was 0.97 times, up slightly from 0.93 times last quarter, and total debt outstanding was $1.5 billion. Our target leverage range of 0.9 times to 1.25 remains unchanged. Driven by our disciplined pace of capital deployment, we remain at the low end of the range. Unsecured debt represented 64% of total debt at quarter end, down slightly from the prior quarter. We have ample dry powder to fund commitments with liquidity of approximately $695 million, including $80 million of cash and $615 million of undrawn capacity on our credit facility. Unfunded commitments, excluding those related to the joint ventures, were $258.9 million, approximately $246.9 million of which can be drawn immediately as the remaining amount is subject to portfolio companies meeting certain milestones before the funds can be drawn. Turning to our two joint ventures, together, the JVs currently hold $513 million of investment primarily in broadly syndicated loans spread across 73 portfolio companies. During the fourth fiscal quarter, the JVs generated ROEs of 12.4% in aggregate. Leverage at the JVs was 1.7 times, compared to 1.3 times last quarter. In addition, we received a $525,000 dividend from the Kemper JV. With that, I'll turn the call back to the operator to open the call for questions.

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. At this time, I would like to remind everyone in order to ask a question, press 1 on your telephone keypad. And your first question comes from the line of Melissa Wedel with JPMorgan.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions today. Definitely noted the turnaround in the level of new net funding activity this quarter. I know that typically December is a seasonally busy quarter, but I'm just curious if you have any early insight into sort of expectations around investment activity in the December quarter this year? And any outsized repayments that should be thinking about?

Thanks, Melissa. It's Armen. In terms of outsized repayments, we don't expect any at this time for the quarter, December. As far as deployment, nothing really stands out either direction, either on the heavy side or the light side relative to past December quarters. You know, we certainly have seen some tightening in the spreads, and so we're judicious about how we're deploying. But I don't see us materially deviating from past quarters in terms of deployment or leverage levels for the quarter.

Okay. I appreciate that. One of the other things related to your comment about spreads tightening, I did notice that the yield on new investments this quarter was a step higher, about 60 bps higher, compared to last quarter. I'm assuming that relates to sort of the complexity of the Walgreens deal, the complexity and size of the Walgreens deal. I guess, one, is that right? And then two, what's your view on sort of a pipeline for transactions like that where there might be more complexity and pricing involved? Thanks very much.

Hey, Melissa. It's Chris. Thanks for the question. I'll start and maybe Armen can add a little bit in terms of pipeline. In terms of the quarter-on-quarter change, I mean, you're right in noting Walgreens. I think the other thing I would just note about June is that on balance, we had a little bit higher originations into your LIBOR indexed loans. So when you're looking at the absolute coupons, you know, June was a little bit lower as a result of that. You know, we do hedge all of that back to US dollars. There is a little bit of a pickup when you take into account that hedging impact, but that does create a little bit of noise, you know, kind of quarter to quarter. Armen, do you have anything?

Yeah. You know, we do have a very active origination function in non-sponsored direct lending. I think Walgreens stands out as a pretty high spread loan. I don't see anything that we would be originating in the December quarter that's quite that high in spread. But we do have a few things that we're working on that might be sort of higher than the 450 to 500 spread that's typical sponsor lending, but I think it's too early at this point to provide forward guidance. I just don't think that the Walgreens deal is not repeatable, I don't think, in the fourth quarter. Oh, sorry. The fourth calendar quarter.

Yep. Understood. Thanks. Our next question comes from the line of Sean Paul Adams with B. Riley Securities.

Hey, guys. Good morning. On the nonaccruals still on the books, it seems like there's still a heavy skew towards healthcare and pharma. Can you just share a little bit more color about what's going on in those particular segments?

Sure. This is Armen. You know, we have or we had a couple of sort of chunky positions in the life sciences space. It's not many in number, but there were unfortunately some larger positions that continue to be the subject of workouts. FIO2 being the, I would say, the most material of them, which is a name that we've talked about on past calls. But that's really what it is. We continue to sort of work out situations that at this point have been in the portfolio for several years. They're all sort of stable to maybe slightly improving, but still not at the position where we're either going to exit or move them into accrual status, unfortunately. We're not adding. We haven't added other kind of life sciences or healthcare names that have created problems in the recent quarters. But again, these handfuls, a small handful of positions that were put on a few years ago continue to sort of weigh on the nonaccrual bucket.

Got it. And as a quick follow-up, is there any workout strategies going on with those long-standing nonaccruals?

They were operational workouts. They have already been, from a capital structure perspective, restructured. But operational improvements are being made. We're working closely with management teams to drive that performance. And when possible, we are working with the management to sell assets and either fund cash burn or repay, or make distributions to our position. But there's nothing significant or monumental that would be happening in the near term with respect to those positions. It's just kind of blocking and tackling with an operational turnaround.

Appreciate the color. Thank you.

Again, if you would like to ask a question, press 1 on your telephone keypad. Thank you. I'm not showing any further questions in the queue. I would now like to turn it back to Clark Koury for closing remarks.

Great. Thank you, operator, and thanks to everybody for joining. Please reach out with any questions. We're happy to jump on the phone. Have a great day.

And that concludes our today's conference call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.