Aaron Christiansen
Analyst
Yes, John, that is another thoughtful question. There are a few elements in your question; I will try to unpack them one at a time. Starting with manufacturing costs, the year-over-year comparison reflects a combination of timing and normal volatility with no single underlying driver or trend. As both Susan, Dan, and I already discussed, we experienced meaningful operational disruption late in the quarter from winter storm Fern, which included temporary production outages at multiple U.S. plants. That created some short-term fixed-cost absorption pressure as well as some variable costs that came with the event. In addition to the timing of the weather—the winter storm late in January—labor-related inputs, in particular benefits, continue to be an area of cost pressure for us, which is not uncommon in the industry. We have seen that flow through our results. I will add here, our repair costs continue to stabilize, directly related to your prior question and the ongoing reinvestment of capital into our asset base. Turning to transportation, we operate in markets that naturally fluctuate, and recent periods reflected a more balanced freight environment. That being said, we tend to view freight performance less through the lens of spot conditions and more through execution and how we take advantage of those spot conditions. I want to thank and recognize our freight and logistics team for the great work they do to align the right carrier partnerships, network design, and operating discipline to consistently meet customer service expectations—wildly high on-time performance that commonly exceeds 90%. Maintaining strong on-time performance while managing freight costs requires daily coordination across the organization; that remains a core operational focus for us regardless of market conditions. We would always be better than market conditions through our operational execution. On packaging input costs, inputs have been relatively stable overall, with offsetting pressures across different materials and sourcing categories, including tariffs. I will remind the audience that a very large portion of our packaging materials are domestically sourced. We are less exposed to tariff costs than many competitors. Our focus here, as elsewhere, is on structural capability—standardization, specification, diversification where appropriate—and supplier engagement and partnership. Rather than short-term commodity movements, we are focused on long-term strategy with the right partners. Those efforts help us manage variability over time, but we do not view them as eliminating exposure to broader cost dynamics. Overall, we continue to manage the business for reliability, service, and long-term operating resilience, recognizing that cost inputs will move differently across categories and time periods.