[Operator Instructions]. Good morning. Thank you for joining OFG Bancorp's Conference Call. My name is Britney, I will be your operator today. Our speakers are Jose Rafael Fernandez, Chief Executive Officer, and Vice Chair of the Board of Directors, and Maritza Arizmendi, Chief Financial Officer. The presentation accompanies today's remarks. It can be found on our Investor Relations website on our homepage in the What's New box or in the quarterly results page. This call may feature certain forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans, and expectations. These statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties outlined in the Risk Factors section of OFG's SEC filings. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated. We disclaim any obligation to update information disclosed in this call as a result of developments that occur afterwards. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. Instructions will be given at that time. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Fernandez.

Good morning and thank you for joining us. I wanted to start our call today thanking all our team members for the excellent work they've done through 2021. We are extremely proud of our achievements, particularly our focus on helping our customers achieve progress and financial well-being. So, let's start by turning to page 3 of our conference call presentation. Fourth quarter earnings per share diluted was $0.66 compared to $0.81 in the third quarter and $0.42 in the year-ago period. Fourth-quarter earnings were impacted by our strategic decision to sell $66 million of past due loans. These loans had already been partially reserved, but required $10 million in additional provision. As for our core business, we continue to demonstrate strong momentum as we ended 2021 and now entered 2022. Core revenues totaled $141 million, that's an increase of 5% quarter-over-quarter and 6% year-over-year. Asset quality continued to improve, resulting in a $3 million net reserve release, which reduced our total provision to $7 million. Non-interest expenses increased $8 million, primarily due to increased investments in people and technology. Pre-provision net revenues totaled $56 million similar to the third quarter, but 26% greater than last year. Looking at the December 30 balance sheet, we ended 2021 with $9.9 billion of assets, postponing the applicability of Durbin later in the summer. Compared to September 30, customer deposits declined $641 million to $8.6 billion. That reflects withdrawals at year-end by government-related and institutional commercial clients. This was partially offset by increased retail deposits. Even with the loans we decided to sell, we saw loan growth in loans held for investments in all 3 of our priority areas, an increase of 5% in commercial loans, ex-PPP, and increase of 9% in consumer loans, and an increase of 1% in auto loans. And new…

Thank you, Jose. Please turn to page 5 to review our financial highlights. Total core revenue was $141 million. That is an increase of about $6.2 million or about 5% from the third quarter. This reflects a $1.5 million increase in net income. NII reflected income from loans and cash, increased income from investment securities, and $1 million in lower cost of funds. The decline in total interest expense was mainly driven by a lower average rate. Growth in total core revenues also reflected a $4.7 million increase in total banking and wealth management revenue. That reflected the fourth quarter receipt of annual insurance commission. This totaled $4.3 million this year compared to $4 million last year. Non-interest revenue growth also reflected more or less increases in recurring banking services on mortgage banking activities. Non-interest expenses totaled $86 million, that is an increase of $7.6 million from the prior quarter. The fourth quarter included increased compensation, technology investments, and costs related to higher levels of business activities. The quarter also included $2.4 million for our legal reserve and to cover operational losses, and $1 million in lower gains on sales of real estate owned compared to the prior quarter. The higher non-interest expenses resulted in an efficiency ratio of 61.4% compared to 58.6% in the third quarter. As Jose mentioned, we will continue to invest in our people and in technology to further deploy our strategies. We now expect in 2022 our efficiency ratio to remain in the low 50% range. Return metrics continued to be in our target range. Return on average assets was 1.3%, return on tangible common equity was 14.1%. We continued to build capital, and tangible book value per share was $19.08. That is an increase of 2.6% from the third quarter and 12.4% year-over-year. Please…

Thank you, Maritza. Please turn to page 8 for our outlook. The macro situation continues to improve in Puerto Rico. We're seeing continued incremental business sector optimism, consumer demand also remained strong and Puerto Rico is at the beginning of an economic growth cycle. In addition, Puerto Rico is on the verge of exiting bankruptcy, we believe this will go a long way towards changing the mainland perception of Puerto Rico and continue to improve its standing in the business community. Within this environment, we will continue the strategies that have been working so well for us, mainly taking advantage of the economic momentum, deploying excess liquidity for loan growth, investing in people and technology, speeding our digital transformation and enhancing the customer experience. We at OFG are more than ready, thanks to our resilient team members for their continued dedication and commitment. With this, we end our formal presentation, thank you all for listening. Operator, let's start the Q&A.

[Operator Instructions]. And we will take our first question from Alex Twerdahl with Piper Sandler, your line is now open.

Hey, good morning.

Good morning, Alex.

First off, I have a bunch of questions here. I want to start with the -- the loan growth that you guys saw this quarter. I was hoping Jose can give us some commentary. We saw some nice commercial loan growth this quarter. Looks like a strong quarter for originations, obviously excluding PPP. But, you know, is this sort of the tip of the iceberg on commercial loan growth, or can you maybe comment on the pipelines, comment on the pay-down activity you are seeing, and give us some extra -- help us think about what our expectations should be for the next couple of quarters, starting with the commercial loan growth?

So what we're seeing this quarter is again, a confirmation of what we have been seeing in the last three or fourth quarters prior, inching up on the originations, inching up on loan balances particularly on the commercial side and the auto lending side as well, now lately in the consumer portfolio. So what I'm feeling right now is at the beginning of the year, last year I mentioned that I was very optimistic, my last 17 years of CEO, was the most optimistic. I think throughout 2021, we saw a confirmation that that optimism is turning into growth for the Puerto Rico economy. So I feel we're in the early innings of economic growth cycle in Puerto Rico now, maybe it's pretty much - the confirmation data is pretty much behind us from last year. So I feel that loan growth is here to stay for the next couple of years as the economy continues to grow. So what we're seeing here when we look at loan growth is production. We feel that the production, and let's call it loan origination, for 2022, the way I look at it is we're going to see higher consumer loan origination. We're going to see relatively similar auto loan origination, and a most likely similar commercial loan origination, which in itself it's a record year we had in 2021. So when we look at that scenario on the production side, I'm excited. And we are as a team very excited to look into deploying our liquidity here. Regarding the other components of the loan balances, we talked about origination, but we also need to talk about paydowns. On the mortgage portfolio, we will continue to have the repayments, and I think with interest rates now starting to inch up, we'll probably have slower repayments on the mortgage portfolio. That's good for us. We will continue to originate and sell, but we will also be a little bit more focused on non-conforming and retaining a little bit of non-confirming. That might be helpful, but we see the portfolio on mortgages, residential mortgage trending lower. On the commercial, we see a good opportunity for us to build that, particularly on the small and mid-sized commercial business clients. We're seeing good opportunities there. And I think line utilization is also going to start trending positively next year, we haven't seen that yet, but we're starting to trend positively. And then pipelines for 2022, we feel that on the commercial side the pipelines are strong and our expectation is that there's going to be opportunities for us to continue to build on those pipelines. So that's kind of my take on loan and loan growth, Alex.

That's really helpful. And then just the last piece of it, the PPP, do you expect the remaining $87 million, is that gone by mid-year? And can you let us know Maritza, do you have in front of you just the PPP fees that we saw this quarter, last quarter and what's remaining in terms of PPP fees?

So on the PPP forgiveness, our expectation is just they should be forgiven by the end of the first half of the year. So that's the answer there. I don't have the data, but Maritza does have the information on the fees on PPP.

Yeah, for this quarter the fees were $2.3 million vis-s-vis $3.4 million last quarter. We still have about $5 million in unamortized fees yet to be recognized.

I'm sorry, can you repeat that one more time you just broke up a little bit? I think you said $3.4 million last quarter $5 million left. What was it this quarter?

This quarter $2.3 million.

$2.3 million in 4Q. Okay. Thank you very much for that. And then I wanted to ask the big announcement yesterday from the bankruptcy judge, kind of signifying the end of bankruptcy. Certainly, you kind of addressed it a little bit in your prepared comments, sort of what the implications could be and certainly [Indiscernible] improve the sentiment around the island. But I'm just as you think out, are there any direct implications for you guys? Does it impact things like your capital plan and as you say that the island is no longer in bankruptcy?

So let me step back a second here on that question, because I think it's important. Let's think about this. The last 10 years prior to 2021 Puerto Rico's economy contracted at the average rate of 2% so as 20% for 10 years, so we had a 20% contraction. We went to bankruptcy, we had all the issues that everybody knows. So when we look at now 2021 and beyond, and I mentioned the growth cycle particularly because of all the stimulus that is coming in and now the rebuilding and the funds from the Maria and the here - and the earthquake's coming in. Puerto Rico it's in a great position right now. So now Puerto Rico has trans -- basically it has moved from a depressionary -- deflationary 10-year cycle into the early stages of a growth cycle. So how does the - how does the exiting of bankruptcy play into all this? Well, certainly very positively because first of all, we get rid of a bunch of debts that we had to pay in the last -- that we were supposed to pay in the last ten years. But more importantly, there are guardrails put in place for the government to invest in the infrastructure and use those federal stimulus and federal funds for reconstruction to build the infrastructure in Puerto Rico, invest in education, invest in the strengthening of the power authority and the privatization that is going on. So all those things are at the early stage. And to me getting out of bankruptcy is going to allow -- eventually, Puerto Rico if we do things right, to access the markets, and be able to expand that growth cycle that is beginning right now.

Great. And then just two more questions for me. One, with respect to your capital actions, capital plans, I know sometimes you announce it kind of an update to the dividend or the buyback at the end of January. Last you returned over a 100% of earnings when you add up the buyback, the preferred retirement and the two dividend increases, is there any reason why with 13.8% common equity tier-1, we should not expect another year of pretty large capital return in 2022?

There's no reason for it. I mean, there's no reason for you not to think about those things. I think you are correct. But let me tell you what our priorities are regarding capital. First and foremost, our capital -- we want to deploy it in good loan growth, and in good loans, and be able to deploy to help the communities and the customers that we serve. So that's number 1. Number 2 in the priorities is looking at the dividend and making sure that we continue to have a growing dividend and then also expect us to be active with the share repurchase. We finished the prior authorization, so more to come with that.

Great. And am I correct on the timing, sort of end of January, end of July, is the two times, so we could potentially get an update next week?

Yes, you're right on the timing.

Great. And then just my final question. I noticed you guys drop right below $10 billion at the end of the year. Does that effectively push Durbin out a full year?

So I tried to mention it in my remarks. Durbin, whereby above $10 billion by December 31st, Durbin would have triggered on July 1st. So you would have had a half-year impact in terms of fee income. We would have had half a year impact in 2022. Now, that half-a-year impact will not materialize, because we closed the year below $10 billion.

Fantastic. So that effectively takes the $10 million or so of interchange fees that you would have lost in the back half of '22 and early 2023 and effectively pushes that impact out a year, assuming you guys continue to grow.

I actually pushed it out. For 2022, it would have been $4.1 million or $4.2 million because it would have been half a year and for a full year, it would have been $10 million. So we actually pushed it all the way to July of 2023.

Thanks for taking my questions.

Yeah, thank you for your questions.

And we will take our next question from Brett Rabatin with Hovde Group. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning, everyone.

Hi, Brett. Welcome to our call.

Good morning.

One of the first --

I should say, welcome back.

Yeah. Thanks. It's good to be back. I guess, first question, I wanted to go over a little bit the loan sales for the quarter of the past two loans, if you could give us some more color on the loans you made, the loans that you sold, the decision to sell those loans and then of the 32-and-a-half million of the charge-offs for the quarter, it sounds like those were proprietary of or related to that. How much of the 32-and-a-half million went into those loans that you sold?

So, Brett, I understood clearly your first part of the question, but I couldn't understand the second part. Let me answer the first part, and then you can ask me the question again, if that's okay with you. So --

Sure.

Why -- what came about of doing the loan sales. These are Scotiabank of money as I mentioned. These are Scotiabank legacy residential mortgage loans mostly. And one commercial loan as part of the acquisition they were -- most of them were on the PCD bracket. And frankly, the residential loans had the several years of non-performance. So it was becoming too cumbersome for us to manage -- add resources, to try to get those loans out of the books. So we decided to sell on get it out of the way so we can focus on what's important. We're also trying to be efficient and not the end of the day. The strategic logic behind it is, how can we move some of our resources that are on the work outside and put them on the front side so we can bring in more loan business so that's also part of the thought process that we had there. And the commercial loan that we sold, it's, again, the same dynamic. It's a participation, and it's not necessarily been performing for a while and we felt that it was the right decision to get it out of the books also at the end of the year. So that's kind of the thought process behind it. Can you ask the second part of your question?

Yes, sure. Jose, the second part of the question was just I think in the press release you noted a significant portion of the net charge-offs of $32.5 million were related to the loan sales. How much specifically was going to the loan sales in terms of net charge-offs?

$30 million.

So out of the $30 million --

Out of the $32 million, $30 million were related to the sale.

Okay, that’s net charge-offs excluding that, were actually pretty modest. And then, as it relates to that, I did notice that the linked-quarter early delinquencies were up a little bit, was there anything that was driving that linked-quarter?

That's -- you'll see the auto portfolio we had a little bit higher early delinquency there. We're looking into it. We feel that we've got our hands around that pretty well and we should have that trending back again to where it should be. And it seems you're asking me about the credit. We continue to see credit very benign compared to what we have managed the prior 10 years, as you can imagine, so going forward, we feel that we have that as a background too. Certainly, we will have to deal with the -- on consumer book, we'll see the charges starting to come in some time in the near future as part of the normal process of getting back to a normal state of the economy [Indiscernible] all the stimulus that was put in. But we don't see that going back to the levels prior to the pandemic, we see those levels better than then. That's how we're seeing it.

Okay. And then I will say roughly, I'm curious, or maybe this is a better question for Maritza. Just thinking about the margin. I know at the end of last quarter for 100 basis point increase, the reported NIAF side was a little over 4% But it would does seem like that could be conservative with cash still being 25% of the balance sheet. And with the Fed possibly raising 3 or 4 times this year, it seemed like your margin is going to benefit throughout the year from Fed action. Maritza, can you talk maybe about how you think about Fed hike's impact on the margin and how you see the margin playing out throughout the year?

So, Brett, we -- as you've pointed out, we are asset-sensitive. We -- the cash will be impacted immediately, so all those things play in our favor. We also have quite a bit of variable rate lending on the commercial portfolio. So let me just give you some color on it but the specifics will come on the 10K when we publish it later in I think it's in early February. But we will be net interest income on a 100 basis points shock, impact of interest rates will be affected positively in the high single-digits. So that's how we're seeing it right now. As we continue to look at all the modeling all these scenarios, and we'll give you the specifics on 10-K, but that's how it looks like.

Okay. And then, wanted to ask about the expenses. There are obviously some hires. I guess, I'll first start with that, just what were the hires in the quarter? Did you add any lenders, maybe talk about the hires you made? And then thinking about the other bucket, is that a level that continues from 4Q or does that come back as we go throughout this year?

So we really -- let me just address that from a different angle with the great resignation that everybody is talking about. What we're seeing on our side is on the hourly employees and the where we're seeing more turnover. So we've had to go out there and recruit some of those to replace and make sure that we keep the house in order in terms of the customer service. We continue to attract good talent, particularly on the consumer side, on the retail side. We have a great team on the commercial side as well. And we've been building. Remember, when we acquired Scotia Bank, we also acquired a bunch of commercial bankers, so we're good there. But on the consumer side and on the retail side, I think we've done excellent hires in the past, and we continue to do so, attracting, and retaining, and developing our talent, so that's how we're looking at our people strategy. We want to make sure that we have the right talent for the future and develop that right talent with the potential they have. So that's kind of where we're coming from. We really lowered or have lower employees this quarter than the prior quarter, but it's pretty much coming from the hourly employees, where we're having higher turnover than usual.

Okay. And then on the G&A expenses, the other line item, that 39 core number for the fourth quarter, is that a good run rate going forward? I assume with the technology expenses and some of the other things, maybe that number could come back a little bit.

So that's why Maritza guided you guys with an efficiency ratio in the low 60s. We feel we're in a unique position here in the market we operate, we really are confident that our vision on how to get closer to the customer and doing better job incrementally on how we service that customer and how we add value to that customer, we feel we are in a unique position in this market and we need to continue to invest and actually increase the speed of the technology investments so that we can affect change faster. From that perspective is that we're coming in, we're looking at people, and we're looking at technology, not as a solution for everything but as a means to actually deploy and execute on our sales and service strategy and be able to take advantage of all the benefits that technology is providing us and the markets in general with data analytics and the cloud migration and be able to be more proactive, taking care of our customers. In the market we operate here in Puerto Rico, we need to be on top of that in order for us to continue our differentiation. And that's what we're doing. We're being very decisive in those investments, because we think is the right thing to do today, and they will bring those incremental differentiations into the future.

Okay, that's great color. I appreciate that, and congrats on the quarter.

Thank you very much

[Operator Instructions]. We will take our next question from Timur Braziler with Wells Fargo. Your line is now open.

Good morning and thanks for the questions.

Hi. Good morning. Welcome to the call.

And thank you. Maybe just starting with the deposit outlook. I know you mentioned you had some government-related which are all institutional client activity. I guess -- What are you thinking about deposits in '22? Does much of that come back online and then as far as government deposits, can you just give us a balance and then what's your expected to exit kind of the bankruptcy resolution here in the near-term?

So overall in deposits, we feel that we're going to have those -- most of those deposits come back and probably going to come back in the first half of the year. So that's kind of where we see that on the government side, I'll let Maritza give you the numbers because I don't have it up at the top of my head.

In general, just to make sure I get the question right, it's how much dormant [Indiscernible] deposit was withdrawn coming back or how much we have at this moment?

How much we have?

How much we have at this moment. We have about $200 million at this moment. And we haven't had much in our history, but we shall have some deposits there.

Historically, we don't consider --

Very much.

Yeah. The government deposits are not a core part of our business.

Okay. And then maybe transitioning over to Balance sheet mix and margin with the decline in deposits and the subsequent decline in cash balances, it looks like much of that happened at year-end and not really reflected in the average balances. Should we see the margin kick up pretty meaningfully here in the first quarter to reflect that mix shift or is there something else going on and might keep margin levels a little lower?

I think than training day, maybe there are seeing sort of margin changes during this quarter, we started to see a peak up there. We will continue with our -- best case scenario is that it will continue to spend positively of us. We'll continue to invest in the loan balance and the changing of deposit mix. So we saw it getting in the bottom in the third quarter, so our expectation is to gradually continue to increase during the quarter -- during the next of the year.

Okay. That's helpful. Thank you. Maybe switching to allowance. The allowance ratio is still pretty high at these levels. I'm wondering, was there an ability to fully absorb the charge-offs from the loan sales through additional reserve releases rather than provisioning for them? And then I guess how does that translate to the current 240s reserve level from here, how should do we see that trend?

I'll let Maritza go into details. But big picture, the answer is no, we couldn't because we need to follow the CSO methodology and that means the economics scenarios, we need to look at the balance of what loans, and we need to at charges, and then we look at the qualitatives and the [Indiscernible]. So I don't think we could have done that particularly or specifically in this transaction. At [Indiscernible], but I'll let Maritza answer the 2nd part of your question regarding how do we see the allowance trending into the future?

Thank you. And in general, Jose, I think that the element is coming into the model again. And we have 2.44% allowance coverage. And we see going forward the asset quality continue to transfer [Indiscernible] and normalizes there to continue going down and move forward day 1 CSO allowance coverage or maybe better. Our forecast is that it will be probably better because of scenarios. Economy scenarios are better down they won CECL implementation, so that's how we see it we need to move to continue mostly with conformation of our expectation on the asset quality trends that so far has been there as we have seen in the middle of this fourth quarter. And the expectation -- and I want to go down as we experience within the next couple of quarters.

Okay. That's helpful. And then last from me, just circling back to expenses, you called out $2 million of tech spend in the quarter, and then during your prepared remarks talked about accelerating some of the tech spend. The efficiency ratio guidance that you provided and just the overall mix shift within the expense bucket, is technology going to become a larger component of the annual tech spend and does the $2 million spent this quarter stick around in the run rate and get built on, or does it fall off at some point as some of these projects and initiatives come to completion?

Tech is going to have a larger component. To answer the question as specific as you want, is this $2 million going to translate into an ongoing number? It's hard to tell because it depends on how do we execute on some of the technology projects. And when they come out and how we start capitalizing those investments. So but they will start trickling in and that's why we feel that part of our strategy is to give you guys a heads up, that we're doing that. But again, it is with the objective of having a return on that investment, executing on our strategy.

Great, thank you very much.

Thank you for your questions and comments.

We do have a follow-up question from Alex Twerdahl with Piper Sandler. Your line is now open.

Thanks. Just a couple of follow-up questions. One on the efficiency guide to the low 60s, what's the assumption on interest rates there? And I guess that's the whole question.

We will -- my answer to that question is, Alex, let the Fed speak and we'll go from there. The Fed have spoken, they have given us guidance on what rates will be looking or how they will be looking, so that's our assumption here and then how that will affect our Balance sheet. We will update you in the 10-K with the shock analysis.

Okay, I guess just asking in a different way if we do get 5 or 6 whatever the forward curve is expecting at this point and you do get that high single-digit up. NII helping revenues is mid-50s efficiency ratio still feasible or what kind of f to stand?

Yeah, I'm glad you asked this question. No, I mean I think our targets remain to be at mid-50s efficiency ratio bank. We're talking about 2022 and so again, we're trying to take advantage of where we are positioned right now, as I mentioned, and accelerate some of these investments. But it is still longer-term. I'm meaning further than 2022, our targets of Mid-fifties, efficiency ratio still apply. So again, that's how we view this and how we're thinking about the low 60s efficiency guidance that we're sharing with you.

Okay. Understood. And then on the balance sheet optimization question. You guys did some securities laddering in the -- I think the third quarter rates are now at 50 basis points from there with the expectation for some of those deposits you cited coming back in in the first quarter and I'm sure you'll get a nice boost from the child tax credit also. Seems like you're still sitting on a huge amount of liquidity to do all sorts of things with. Is there a strategy to continue laddering some of that cash into securities?

Yes.

Any sense for how much you'd be willing to purchase in any given quarter?

We have to yet decided on how -- in terms of quantity. I don't have the number, but we need to think around and decide. But again, it's going to be incrementally increasing.

Great. And then just circling back on the reserve question, the charge-offs -- the 2% charge-offs this quarter, obviously the bulk of that related to the loan sale. When you think about the CECL model, does that get incorporated in your loss history or would the loss history and the CECL model be more like that 15 basis points for loan book that remains?

No. We exclude the -- it is excluded, the $30 million charge-off related to the sale.

Awesome. So you're looking more like a 15 basis point net charge-off or loss rate?

Yes.

Maybe that's a little bit low relative to where it will shake out over the next couple quarters, but still a lot lower than where it was and --

Yeah.

Much more comparable to a mainland bank while your reserve is still double. Got it.

That's why we mentioned the benign credit environment.

Great, thanks for taking my follow-ups.

Yes, thank you. Thank you for your question.

Thank you.

And we do have follow-up from Brett Rabatin with Hovde Group. Your line is now open.

Yeah. Just 2 follow-up -- quick follow-ups. One, the legal reserve that you guys did this quarter, can you maybe give any color on what that was related to?

Finishing up or cleaning up the legacy arbitration cases on the broker-dealer from the actually from the Puerto Rico municipal debt bankruptcy issues. So we've had to build up some legal reserves for that. And in the quarter we took some research for that. That's what it is all about.

And then, OFG USA, any update on what their pipeline looks like and how you think that might be a contributor to your growth this year?

So right, we will continue to execute the U.S. loan. We've been added for 4 years now. As you recall, we started in 2017 after Hurricane Maria. And frankly, we have been building a nice, good portfolio. We have great relationship with some of our partners in the States too. And we built a team around it. It's becoming incrementally more real. So we're very happy with that portfolio. We will continue to build on it. And as we have been doing 2021, we did and 2022, we'll be the same. So that's how we see that. And again, it's part of also deploying some of our capital and taking advantage of diversifying our risk geographically, so again, we feel that the pipelines are equally strong as what we're seeing in Puerto Rico.

Okay. And then maybe one last one, just on capital and just thinking about the relative levels and it would seem like if Puerto Rico is finally turning the corner, it seems like the regulators would be a more amenable to maybe less of a buffer for Puerto Rico relative to the U.S. Can you talk maybe about, if you think that might be the case and if so, besides buybacks, is there anything else that you're thinking about in terms of trying to further improve your relative profitability on the capital base?

I don't really think that the regulators would be -- would allow us to be very much more aggressive than what we have been. I think they are -- as we are all very close to what has happened recently in the recent past here in Puerto Rico. So I think it will take a couple more years for them to think about Puerto Rico, I would say from a risk perspective, similar to the U.S. jurisdictions. And that's my own opinion. I am here sharing my opinion. So we operate within rolling capital perspective. We operate with a view of we are having good earnings growth, we are having good momentum. We have excess capital. If we don't see opportunities to deploy that capital in the markets we operate, then we need to return that capital to shareholders. And then we do the numbers and more to come throughout 2022 on the same capital management strategies.

Okay, great for showing the color.

You're welcome.

At this time, there are no further questions. I will turn the program back over to Mr. Fernandez for closing remarks.

Thank you, Operator. Thanks again to all our team members for their hard work and dedication throughout the past year. We look forward to a great 2022. Thank you all -- to all our stakeholders who have listened in today's, goodbye.

This does conclude today's program. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at any time and have a wonderful day.