Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the O-I Glass First Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Mr. Chris Manuel, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Jillian, and welcome everyone to the O-I Glass first quarter 2022 earnings conference call. Our discussion today will be led by Andres Lopez, our CEO and John Haudrich, our CFO. Today we will discuss key business developments and review financial results. Following prepared remarks, we'll host a Q&A session. Presentation materials for this call are available on the company's website. Please review the Safe Harbor comments and the disclosure of non-GAAP financial measures included in those materials. I'd now like to turn the call over to Andres, who will start on Slide 3.

Good morning, everyone. I appreciate your interest in O-I Glass. We reported a strong first quarter results last evening. Adjusted earnings of $0.56 per share significantly exceeded guidance primarily due to better than expected shipments and productions levels. As illustrated on the left, earnings improved across all key measures with adjusted EPS up 60% from the prior year. Shipments increased nearly 6.5% reflecting a strong demand for healthy, sustainable glass containers and growth was most pronounced in Europe. The team did a great job increasing the speed and efficiency to boost production to meet demand amid historically low inventory levels. In the Americas, the business also rebounded from the impact of winter storm URI last year. As expected, higher selling prices across all markets more than offset elevated cost inflation and favorable performance reflected the benefits of our ongoing margin expansion initiatives. Our hearts go out to all those impacted by the tragic conflict in Ukraine. Keep in mind we do not have operations in Ukraine or Russia, so we have not been directed impacted. However, these developments have complicated an already challenging situation, even elevated cost inflation and supply chain issues. But I will discuss later. O-I continues to demonstrate increased agility and execution disciplines, delivering on its commitments despite elevated macro uncertainty. As we managed through a highly volatile environment, we continue to make very good progress on our transformation. Our multiyear margin expansion initiatives are off to a good start this year. We are investing in expansion. We are advancing MAGMA, ESG and our Glass Advocacy campaign. Likewise, we are optimizing our portfolio and addressing legacy liabilities. As announced yesterday, Paddock recently achieved another key milestone has voting asbestos claimants overwhelmingly approved the proposed plan of reorganization. Paddock is now entering the final phase of the Chapter…

Thanks, Andres, and good morning, everyone. I plan to cover a few topics today including recent performance, progress on financial priorities, as well as our 2022 business outlook. I'll start with a review of our first quarter performance on Page 7. O-I reported very strong first quarter 2022 adjusted earnings of $0.56 per share, which significantly exceeded our guidance and prior year results of $0.35 per share. Higher earnings reflected favorable net price. Strong sales volume and solid operating performance, which also benefited from the rebound of winter storm Uri last year. Segment operating profit was $231 million, up from $175 million last year. Favorable net price in increased segment operating profit by $15 million as higher selling prices more than offset elevated cost inflation. Volume and mix added $17 million, as shipments increased 6.4%. Finally favorable operating performance helped reduce operating costs by $26 million. Increased speed and efficiency boosted production levels 3.7%, which supported strong demand amid record low inventory levels. Segment operating profit improved significantly in both the Americas and Europe. The Americas posted segment profit of $129 million, up from $100 million last year, reflecting favorable spread, more than 3% sales volume growth, and improved operating costs. Higher earnings also reflected the rebound from winter storm Uri last year, and incremental benefits from our margin expansion initiatives. In Europe segment operating profit was $102 million, compared to $75 million in the prior year. Earnings benefited from higher shipments which increased nearly 10%. Very good operating performance, as well as higher selling prices, which more than offset elevated cost inflation. The segment also benefited from our ongoing margin expansion program. The chart provides additional details on nonoperating items. Overall, we are very pleased with our first quarter results, reflecting favorable performance across all key business levers. Let's…

Thanks, John. Let me wrap up with a few comments on this slide. We head off to a strong start this year. First quarter earnings significantly exceeded our original guidance, as the regions performed well across all key business levers supported by a strong demand for healthy sustainable glass packaging. Importantly, we are focused on a set of near-term catalysts to create value. Efforts to recapture the impact of cost inflation and our margin expansion initiatives are going well. We are enabling a strong demand with increased production speed and efficiency. Following decades of litigation we intend to establish a fair and final resolution of our legacy asbestos liabilities by midyear which have consumed over 40% of our cash flows in the last decade alone. Likewise, our Portfolio Optimization Program is moving swiftly and we expect to complete that program this year which will support our respective expansion projects over the next three years. O-I is a much more agile and capable organization, as we have demonstrated over this past year, through disciplined and effective execution and consistently meeting or exceeding our commitments. We remain optimistic about 2022 and expect higher earnings both in the second quarter, and full year that reflect our confidence in our team, and business performance. Thank you for your interest in O-I Glass and we welcome your questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from Ghansham Panjabi from Baird. Your line is open.

Thank you. Good morning, everybody, and congrats on a very strong start to the year.

Good morning.

Thank you. Good morning, Andres. I guess first off just sort of thinking high level in terms of what's been happening in Europe, can you just give us a better sense as to why volumes have started up so strong in the year? And then just in terms of the competitive backdrop, with plants being located in Ukraine and Russia, et cetera, just give us a sense as to what the current capacity situation is in Europe?

Thank you, Ghansham. So the situation in Europe is quite positive. The demand has been driven by pretty much every segment in which we are involved. Now mineral water, which decreased dramatically during the pandemic time is fully back and that is a substantial volume. As we've said before, Champagne, Bordeaux Wine, Prosecco, Italian Wine, they were also quite soft before the pandemic. As we entered the pandemic, and in the last year or so, these categories are becoming stronger and stronger and they're driven by local demand as well as by exports. Now, we are present in, and we have a very large presence in two markets in Western Europe, France and Italy, where beer is performing extremely well and is growing very fast and ahead of alternative packaging. And the factor that related to your question that is also boosting demand for multiple suppliers, [indiscernible] not your size, and you've seen it in our reports, is the fact that the capacity that used to go from Russia and Ukraine into Europe is not going anymore, and it won't go for any foreseeable future. So that is substantial amount of capacity. Now, some capacity also shut down because of the macro conditions and most likely will take a while to return. So those are specific to Europe. Now, there are factors that are common to all markets, including Europe. Consumers are focused on premium products. At home consumption remains, the performance of glass in off-premise and on-premise has been very strong. So channel ship is not really impacted, in fact, is favorable to glass. Inventories in the supply chain are very low and they will continue for a while because the market is totally oversold. The MPD activity is high and glass is local and that's very convenient for many customers.

Okay, thanks for that Andres. And then in terms of the asbestos settlement, obviously you're very, very close to that at this point. Can you just take us through the tax consequences? Is the full amount fully tax deductible? What year would that start to kick in? And just any other color you could share with us on the taxation of this?

Yes, yes, Ghansham, this is John. Just as in the past this type of payment would also be a tax deductible item. You know, obviously, taxes are complex, and there's net carry forward losses and things like that that need to be considered. But this does extend out that period of benefit for the organization. And there is a reasonable amount of tax shield associated with this. Of course, tax regimes matter. But it will probably be a couple of years before this comes into play considering the net loss carry forward position that the company is in right now, but it does extend that window.

Okay, awesome. Thanks so much.

Your next question comes from Mike Roxland from Truist Securities.

Hi, Andres, John, Chris, congrats on a strong start to the year.

Thank you.

Andres, I just wanted to follow up on your comments on the MAGMA rollout. I think the last quarter you referenced the three-month plus delay in projects activity and that was due to the supply chain and contract labor. It sounds now that this is also impacting the roll out of MAGMA. Can you just give us any more color on how you anticipate rolling out MAGMA? I think you were supposed to have 11 lines rolled out by 2024. How do you see that now playing out? And does that affect the EBITDA guidance or free cash flow guidance that you provided at your Investor Day in September?

Okay, so we are making very good progress developing MAGMA Gen 1, Gen 2, Gen 3, developing Ultra, which goes along with that, which is Light-Weighting containers, as well as designing for alternative fuels use in MAGMA. Now, as everything else in the project space, our development has been delayed is taking longer, as you mentioned. So it is depending on what equipment is involved, it is more standard or less. Now, all things have been also impacting the development of MAGMA. The COVID lockdowns has slowed down development, labor shortages and these lately times that we already mentioned. So we are increasing our focus and resources on developing MAGMA so we can record timelines. Now projects in general are exposed to the same pressures of the supply chain, and it is very high inflation in capital equipment and it equipment impacts. So we engage in an effort that we call capitalist function with a third-party support to analyze our whole plan implementation and the Reset Plan. And what we're doing is identifying projects, alternative projects that can be smaller or simpler or faster to implement or lower capital intensity, and can be geographically distributed. So they reduce risk, but allow us to meet the objectives we committed to. So the objectives are intact. The composition of projects will change and we're going to be able to share more details on that in the near future. But we are moving forward to meet the same objectives we laid out for you, including developing MAGMA and making sure Gen 3 is available for deployment in 2025.

And, Mike, for clarity on your later question there is, all of our earnings related outlook that we laid out on I-Day is very much intact. We're managing this as Andres said, to be able to achieve that, that means sales volume growth should be in place, earnings should be in place, the balance sheet should be in place. On the cash flow side it is going to be a little bit lumpier just because of the supply chain elements there. But the cash flow generation over the three-year cycle remains intact. It's just going be a little bit more lumpy and we will lay that out in the future once we got the plan off fully scoped out.

Got it, thank you. There's just two quick, there's two follow ups just on that, John. When do you think you will be providing an update on the revised plan, and what you're looking to do to achieve the financial metrics you laid out at I-Day? And then just quickly, any comments you have on early trends you're seeing thus far into 2Q? Thanks very much, and good luck on the quarter.

Yes, as far as laying out the update here, probably the next quarter we will be doing that, understanding that supply chain issues are the dominant factor here. So we'll lay out the new plan and the revised plan and everything like that. We just need to understand that we'll also have to continue to be agile going forward as supply chain issues continue to persist or change.

Yes, with regards to April and the second quarter, we are shipping in line with our forecast. The forecast reflects one less day in shipment, but it also reflects large furnace repairs that are taking place at this point. But demand is quite as strong across all markets and it continues that way. The operational performance is very strong. We just mentioned that our teams globally are very well organized, leveraging the capabilities they developed to be able to increase the speed and efficiency which are allowing us to serve even incremental demand. And so we are very optimistic about the year. We're very confident in our execution and this quarter continues to reflect that.

Next question, Ray?

Thank you. Our next question comes from George Staphos from Bank of America.

Everyone, good morning. Thanks for the details and congratulations on the quarter. And frankly, the clarity of the presentation continues to improve guys, so we thank you for that. I guess my question, when we go through your guidance, look at 2Q, look at the first quarter and just use midpoints and recognizing that simplistic analysis, it suggests that the second half of the year is perhaps down versus last year. And I'm just trying to understand gentlemen, to what degree you're just building in some cushion, because of the obvious unpredictability in Europe and elsewhere that you've got to contend with, both again, in terms of what's happening with the Ukraine and Russia and inflation and the like, and if we could extract that cushion assuming there is that in there, what would that amount look like? And then what would your guidance be, if not for the, for that? And then I guess the second question that I had related to that is, was there any effect of pre-buy from what you could see in the results? And then just a quick follow on to Mike's question with MAGMA. MAGMA is itself a model where you were trying to have smaller, more modular capacity that's more geographically dispersed. So I'm not sure exactly what you're getting at in terms of the adjustment to the plans since MAGMA is in itself a plan of using smaller, more modular capacity that's dispersed? Thanks, guys and good luck in the quarter.

Thank you. So let me just start with the first question. We are very optimistic about the year and we continue to see very favorable demand fundamentals. Operating performance is very strong. We are effectively pricing through cost inflation. So we are in a in a good position. Now, as we all know, there is a significant macro uncertainty which impacts all industries. It's not just glass, and it's not just wine. And that is characterized, for example, by input costs volatility, the supply chain risk, and potential recessionary pressures at some point, and it is difficult to determine when that point will be. But our operations are solid and we are optimistic for the year. But we also want to reprogram.

Yes, maybe to add on that, specifically to some of the number calculations you're doing George there to just give you our perspective and how we were thinking about it. We did increase the top end of the range by $0.10. As we look at it, the first quarter exceeded the top end of our original guidance by $0.13. But at the same time, we do have a few cents of added pressures, stronger dollar, higher interest expense, and things like that. So that kind of drove that net $0.10 number there. We have not made any further adjustments to our forward business outlook from what our original guidance was just reflecting those dynamics on the top end. So obviously, it's early in the year and we will continue to update our outlook as we navigate the market volatility. One thing to keep in mind in the second half of the year is, we do have probably about $0.13 of year-over-year headwinds associated with FX, divestitures, dilution, and additional interest on Paddock. So keep in mind, those are numbers are kind of just structural elements there, which really would indicate that operating performance we expect them to be good, and in the back half of the year from an operating performance standpoint.

Thanks for that, John, very fair. With regards to the pre-buy, strong shipments in Europe have been taking place for two quarters in a row. So that takes us to believe that this is not a pre-buy situation. And when we take into consideration the various factors that are common to all regions, as well as the individual factors impacting demand in Europe, we believe those are really the drivers. So pre-buy might be some. We believe it is very little if there is, and two quarters in a row wouldn't be a pre-buy situation. With regards to MAGMA, you're right. It allowed us to implement the smaller capacity and all that. However, most of the projects we had in our plan are very large greenfields, through MAGMA, but very large greenfields and the issue with them, for example, is lead times and inflation impact those kind of projects more than very small projects that are primarily lights and extensions and things like that. One reason for that is the civil infrastructure that needs to implement it. So buildings and steel and all that, that's going through a material inflation. So what we are doing with lots of agility, which is one more example of the change at O-I is reconfigured our plans that meet our objectives, which is really what are the drivers of value for shareholders.

And maybe one thing to add on that MAGMA component, the ultimate solution Gen 3 is the one that really allows you to scale down and go into the light manufacturing warehouse and things like that. Where we are in the development cycle the plans over the next couple of years here were really more like a Gen 1.5 or 2, which still rely on a lot of the larger infrastructure items. But ultimately, that's why we want to accelerate Gen 3 because it is a great solution for the situation that we're seeing now.

Thank you, guys.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from Mark Wilde from Bank of Montreal. Your line is open.

I'd like to add my congratulations, very good quarter.

Thank you.

Andres, can you talk about how you are managing the European energy pricing in the first quarter and whether energy prices in Europe, which looks like they're going to be much higher going forward, is sourcing changes, whether that's causing any long-term changes in your planning for the European market?

Okay, so the -- we had started our work to deal with the situation that we're going through today, a long time ago. And our capabilities in procurement, for example, allow us to manage inflation to a point. But our capabilities in the commercial space are also a big support to be able to deal with this. And we have started to plan all our work for price increases to be able to fully offset inflation not later than the middle of last year, and we've been executing according to our plan. So we plan very early and we plan well, and we're executing in line with that. We believe we have the right mechanisms to work through these from a procurement standpoint, from a commercial standpoint, but also the culture of the company, because this is a company that works very well cross functionally. And to deal with this kind of situation, you need a lot of cross functional work. You need the finance team in there, you need business intelligence, you need a lot of help from different functions to be able to do it. Is this having a long-term impact in the business? Can this change our perspective of the business? Not at this point. I think with what we know today, we believe we can navigate this well. If things change, if things deteriorate, we'll adjust accordingly. But so far, we feel very good about the way we've been handling to this.

I would add two points. I think that Mark real quick, is that you know, we are investing in other energy switching capabilities so that we would have the flexibility between energy, oils and other things like that from just increased flexibility. And then really over the long run with MAGMA to be able to run off of biofuels and hydrogen down the road. Granted, that's a few years out, those markets need to develop, but it gives you even more flexibility on an energy standpoint over the long-term.

Okay, and I want to just kind of following on that, Andres, can you give us some sense of what all of these cost changes have meant in terms of the relative costs of glass versus other substrates? And whether any of those changes are altering the behavior of your customers?

Yes, so the boy, for this period of time there was a gap between us and really one alternative packaging, if you will. That differential has decreased by 50%. So for all purposes, it is favorable to glass. Now, it is important to keep in mind that in some cases, and in particular, when we compare with aluminum cans, we play in different lanes. And they are driven by energy drinks or sports drinks, bottled water, hard seltzers, carbonated soft drinks, those products which are growing and are driving their performance. In our case, we're driven by or our demand is driven by premium products, in spirits, in wine, in food, in NABs, in beer. So we are in different lanes. We play in different segments. But if you want to compare a container for a given segment between the two, that gap has closed.

Okay, very good. I'll turn it over, thank you.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from Gabe Hajde from Wells Fargo Securities.

Andres, John, Chris, good morning.

Good morning.

Good morning.

So you guys, I think Andres you just confirmed kind of historically speaking, it's been a wise practice to forward by or hedge energy kind of beginning in the mid year or even before that. So I think as we kind of think about 2023 and rolling those forward, I want to say energy is around 20% of cost of goods, depending on what you're making. Would that then imply that you need another round of kind of high single digit price increases in Europe and I appreciate things are fairly volatile at the moment, but just sort of where freeze energy where it's at today?

Yes, so we've been executing as we promise, so last year we got the question very often with regards to, are you going to record inflation? And our answer was yes, we will. And we've done it and we had our first price increase inflation continued to go up. We implemented the second. So we will continue to monitor inflation. And if the situation presents itself with incremental inflation, we're going to take action.

And I would add Gabe that we take a very long-term structural approach to our procurement and financial management of the organization. We don't go, it's not a month to month or quarter to quarter type of practice with the organization, so we try to manage over the long-term.

Okay. And then I guess, down in Brazil, have you seen any change, either, I guess, on the consumer side, in terms of consumption patterns and or at your customers, I think it's reasonable to assume they're a little bit more economically sensitive down there. And given the inflation that they've seen on the consumer side, maybe a little bit more replenishment of the returnable fleet or anything like that, that you've seen versus runway?

Yes, so the -- there is a large scale expansion of premium beer taking place in Brazil and that is generating a very large volume, which is utilizing in full the capacity available for glassing in the country. Those products tend to be less impacted by this inflationary situation in Brazil. So at this point we are sold out. All the capacity is being used and this large scale expansion of premium beer continues. Now returnable containers are being emphasized and I encourage you to take a look at the latest presentations by large customers in that country and you will see how the emphasis is not only in glass, but in returnable glass. And that is also going through the system. You know that when inflation goes up in those countries, in those economies, returnable containers are a very good way to protect margins by our customers.

Thank you, good luck.

Your next question comes from Kyle White from Deutsche Bank. Your line is open.

Thank you, good morning. Thanks for taking the questions and congrats on a very strong quarter. Just hoping to better understand the volume cadence through the quarter, you know, up 6% for the quarter, but I believe volumes are tracking up 4% through February. So why is such an acceleration in March? Was this just all related to taking share from Russia and Ukraine or any other details you can provide?

Well, I think it's the multiple factors that we described are common to markets and the ones that are particular to Europe. So mineral water, for example, is accelerating in that period of time. when economies were still locked down or limited in activity, and the on-premise channel was partial capacity, the mineral water was lower, now it is fully up. The experts of champagne and Prosecco, Bordeaux Wine, Italian wine are very strong and thus driving that incremental demand. The year performance in the countries that I described in Western Europe, of course, the capacity in Ukraine and Russia that is not going into Europe, is a buffer for the entire system. So I think when we look at Europe, it is important to take into consideration that there is a significant buffer. So demand kind of slowed down quite a bit before that buffer is consumed, so that helps us to be confident about the demand in Europe.

If I could just follow up, do you have a sense of how much volumes from Russia and Ukraine, were a benefit for you, to you this quarter and you kind of expect for the balance of the year from that?

Yes, there are multiple dislocations taking place, but I would guess that if we highlight a gross number, it could be around 1 million or million tons.

So it's about a 20 million tonnes system over in Europe to give you an idea.

Well it's a very large buffer and that's not considering the drivers of incremental demand in the market. It's just these dislocations that create a gap of 1 million tonnes or so that needs to be absorbed by the local capacity.

Got it? And then on my second question, can you just provide an update on your inventory levels? You know, typically, I believe you guys use the first quarter to kind of build up inventories. Doesn't seem like that was necessarily the case given the strong demand this quarter. Will that impact maybe volumes or typical seasonality through the balance of the year or how should we think about it?

Well, so the -- our inventories have been reduced over the last two or three years. The reason why we can do it is because we changed the planning processes of the company and you might recall that we implemented IBP Integrated Business Planning, which changes how this business can be run. And as a result of that planning process, our supply and demand planning capabilities, which are very different than they used to be, and the flexibility in our manufacturing operations, when we combine all of that this company is able to work with much lower inventories and that's what we were saying. So our inventories are lower. Now, demand obviously, is very strong. So at some point, we're going to be limited by inventories. But I think it's important to highlight that we believe the levels we described for this year, we believe are sustainable. And we might be able in some places to still go even further down because of what I described before.

Yes, just to back that up with a couple of data points. On a year over year basis, our IDS inventory day sales was done about eight days. And on a sequential basis between the fourth quarter and the first quarter, they're done about two days. And you're right, usually you start to build some up there. But we do believe as Andres says, we are continuing to manage to lower inventories through the new technology. This summer we're putting in new, more new technology. So we're regularly doing this to be able to support this going forward. And keep in mind, we are also with this better speed and efficiency that we talked about before, building up good capacity additions to the business to be able to support that. So the combination of managing to continue to lower inventory efficiencies increased capacity is supporting the strong demand growth that we're seeing.

Yes and in some markets, we did some line extensions last year. So we highlighted that in previous calls. That's something that is supporting us to serve incremental demand in those markets.

Got it, thank you. I'll turn it over.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from Adam Josephson from KeyBanc. Your line is open.

Thanks, everyone. Good morning. Hope you're well.

Good morning.

Yes, good morning, Andres. John a couple of cash flow questions for you if you don't mind. The -- you raised your net income guidance by a little bit. Free cash flow language was the same I know inflation is getting more severe. And it seems like you've raised your volume expectations by something. So can you just help us with the extent to which your free cash flow expectations have changed at all? I know the language remains the same, but at or above 125 could be a very big range for all we know. So how are you thinking about free cash flow compared to three months ago? And how wide is the range that you're really thinking about that it could be this year?

Yes, yes, thanks for the question. And keep in mind, that's parallel to the, our earnings outlook. So you know, we have $1.85 to $2.10 is our EPS outlook. So $1.85, we do think that is kind of the floor. Well, the $125 million of free cash flow is the equivalent floor to that, to that earnings number. So to the degree that earnings outperforming continued to be on the mid to higher end of our guidance range, it would lead you to believe that that free cash flow also would continue to improve. So to give you a kind of a sense, you can kind of look at that range and get a feel for the magnitude of the opportunity there. You know, one thing I would say is, you take a look at the other levers of cash flow, besides EBITDA you know our cash flow, most of them remain pretty stable overall. We expect working capital to be a -- continue to be a modest source of cash going forward this year compared to the prior year, free -- our CapEx is pretty stable overall, obviously, we're changing your plans around a little bit, but the overall numbers are pretty stable. And you look at the other levers that we outlined at the year end, they pretty much are intact. So hopefully that gives you a sense of the range and possibility and how we're thinking about that guidance.

I appreciate it. Just one followup, I mean, could it end up being, are you thinking that the number could be considerably higher than that $1.25 or are you thinking no, what we really think is it's $1.25 or something maybe a little bit higher, but not dramatically. So?

Well, I think you could look at the range based upon the earnings range. And yes, and it's, by that picture, and that gives you at least a sense of the EBITDA movement. You know that the other thing that could be choppy is, capital investments could be choppy, just with supply chain issues and things like that. So those are the variables we're mostly taking a look at.

Yes, and whatever your conversion ends up being this year, John, are you thinking just based on your change CapEx plans for this year and perhaps beyond that your conversion will be similar over the next two years, as it will be this year or are you thinking that conversion could change in a pretty material fashion over the three-year period?

Well, what I would say is, that we primarily focus on conversion on adjusted free cash flow, taking out the strategic capital, because that will be lumpy. So, that guidance that we've provided during our Investor Day, I think it was 30 or 35, or something like that of adjusted free cash flow conversion is what we expect to generate over that period of time. Now to the other question of supply chains and they're affecting the capital timing and things like that. But let us come back a little bit later in the year, midyear, whatever, to give you a better sense of what that is. It really is again, it's driven mostly by supply chain things. Overall, we're seeing a little bit of spreading out of the capital expenditures, just things are always three to six months slower right now than then you'd like so. So that kind of needs to be flushed through the overall sequencing compared to what we are originally expecting.

I appreciate that. And just one last one, John, if I may, I think George was asking about, I think cushion or potential cushion and in your full year guidance given the outperformance of 1Q and given your second quarter guidance? Are you, just to be clear, are you thinking about it like that or are you thinking, now look, visibility is just, it's limited. And I mean, look at how much you beat your first quarter guidance by – visibility is very limited and this is really the best we can do. And we don't really think there's a whole lot of "cushion" in terms of the implied 2H guidance. Can you just flesh that out a little bit more?

Yes, I mean, I go back to the original guidance for the year that we gave heading into the year ahead at $0.20 range right on a relative sense of performance or so. Now we have a little bit of a wider range because we picked up the top end, I'm sorry, had a $0.15 now it's a $0.25 range. So, as we think about it what we've done is we've increased the top end of our guidance range, based upon what we've achieved in the first quarter. We really haven't rebased anything else for the balance of the year. So to the degree that the business has good momentum, we continue to see solid demand in the ability to get the creep capacity and to be able to generate more sales volume. Yes, there's probably some upside to that, but there's also all the uncertainties that we're talking about. So there's just a slew of different variables in place. So it's harder to identify a particular cushion or not. All I would say is that we're incrementally more positive on the operating performance of the things that we can control, but there's the uncertainties of the macros, and we're just going to have to work that through the next several months, I think that will be pretty telling on those elements and we'll update guidance as we get closer to midyear.

Thanks so much, John.

Your next question comes from Jay Mayers from Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning, everybody. Thank you for taking the time and squeezing me in here. Just one quick one from me here on the balance sheet. Congratulations first of all on coming close to the Paddock settlement. With regards to the $600 million delay draw term loan, just wondering if you can help me kind of think through that funding source. So first of all, it's kind of an option for you right now and then even if it is drawn relatively short maturity. So curious if you can help me think about how that becomes a permanent part of the capital structure versus kind of some considerations around CapEx, asset sales, et cetera? Thank you.

Yes, so our intent would be to use the delayed draw when we complete Paddock and we fund it, and to your point is, within our BCA, that delayed draw has a -- and it extends to the end of 2024. So we have something over a year and a half, to be able to address that on a long-term basis. Ultimately we would look to refinance that into longer-term debt. Of course, at the same token, you brought the point we continue to do our portfolio optimization, more cash is coming in. You know, we have a couple $100 million more still to come. And so, we'll be looking at the inflows of that and that the rebalancing of the delayed draw, and the rest of things in totality here, not to mention the cash flows of the business. So we would expect to be active in the capital markets sometime over the balance of the year in all likelihood, but let's see how those cash flows come through those other sources too.

Very helpful. Thank you very much.

Jillian, I think we have time for one more question.

Sure. Your last question comes from Anthony Pettinari from Citi. Your line is open.

Hi this is actually Bryan Burgmeier sitting in for Anthony. Thanks for the new volume growth guidance for 2022. Just given some of the supply constraints that you've spoken about, is there a cap on the level of volume growth that O-I could see this year? And then based on the level of volume growth already seen in 1Q and your guidance for 2Q it seems to be implying kind of flat or negative growth for the second half, I'm just wondering if you can explain that dynamic a little bit?

Yes, so we have multiple sources of incremental capacity to support incremental demand this year. One is we're not having a repeat of the storm Uri impact in the first quarter, so that's one. Liner sensors [ph] that we implemented last year, and are now available for us to get into incremental supply, increased productivity, which is quite impactful, and it's going quite well. Inventories, depending on the market and we have more available in inventories, but we continue to work on that. And then just exiting the year, we will have two large projects already available, which is the project in [indiscernible] and the project in Canada.

Yes, I mean, I think I could add a couple more context there. If you look at our increased productivity our increased level of production in the first quarter was just 3.7%. It fell into three buckets of that equal size. One was the rebound for winter storm Uri that's come and gone. The other one third is the capacity that Andres talked about, but the other one third is that increased speed and efficiency that we've been achieving. So the enduring element of that is probably your biggest incremental headwind to be able to -- I mean that incremental benefit, to be able to deliver more, say deliver on more sales out there, as well as how well we -- how efficient we can be with inventories.

Got it. Thanks for that detail. Last question from me, a large beverage producer that hasn't really used glass historically is conducting a returnable glass pilot in the U.S. right now. Can you just remind us from a wise perspective, how do the economics of returnable glass compare to the economics of one-way glass? And is it possible to say what percent of your current portfolio comes from returnable glass right?

Yes, so the returnable glass has very large presence in Latin America, it does not in the United States, because it makes multiple trips to the market, which is the best option from affordability perspective available in the market, because it's better for consumers, it is better for our customers too. There are some pilots and there is increasing interest in returnability in the United States. We got to watch them closely to see how they develop. But at this point, as I mentioned before, we're seeing incremental emphasis on returnable glass in markets like Brazil because of the higher inflation in those markets. Now from a sustainability standpoint, there is no better package than to returnable glass. It beats everyone else by a very large margin.

Yes, and just to underscore the economics there, let's say that you just use a baseline of $0.10 for a bottle obviously, it could be all over, but depending on the bottle and the market that you're in, but the equivalent returnable item on a pre unit of consumption is well below $0.01. I mean, these bottles usually make lifes, you know, trips 20 to 30 times even with collection and cleaning costs and stuff like that. They're well, well below anything out there that you can touch in the marketplace, whether it's glass, aluminum, plastic, whatever.

Got it, thanks a lot.

Okay, guys thanks. That concludes our earnings call. Please note, our second quarter call is scheduled for August 3. And remember, it tastes better in a glass, so make it a memorable moment by choosing safe, healthy and sustainable glass. Thank you.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.