Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. And welcome to the Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2018 Ocean Power Technologies Conference Call. My name is Sabrina and I will be your coordinator for today. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. I would like to turn the presentation over to your host for today’s call, Mr. Steven Calk, Investor Relations for Ocean Power Technologies.

Good morning. And thank you for joining us for Ocean Power Technologies conference call and webcast. On the call with me today are George Kirby, President and Chief Executive Officer and Matthew Shafer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. George will provide an update on the Company’s operating highlights, and then Matt will review the fourth quarter and full fiscal year 2018 financial results. Following our prepared remarks, we will open the call to questions. This call is being webcast on the Company’s website at www.oceanpowertechnologies.com. It will also be available for replay after this call. On July 17, 2018, Ocean Power Technologies issued its earnings press release, and filed its full year report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2018 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All our public filings can be viewed on the SEC Web site at www.sec.gov or you may go to the OPT Website, www.oceanpowertechnologies.com. Now let me now reference the Safe Harbor Provisions of the U.S. Securities Laws for forward-looking statement. This conference call may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including the future operating and financial performance of Ocean Power Technologies or OPT. Although, OPT believes that the expectations reflected in its forward-looking statement are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Important risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements are included in OPT’s filings with SEC. The information contained in this call is accurate only as of the date discussed. Investors should not assume that the statements will remain operative at a later time. And OPT undertakes no obligation to update any information discussed in this call. Now, I am pleased to introduce Mr. George Kirby, President and CEO of Ocean Power Technologies to begin the discussion. George?

Thanks, Steve and good morning everyone. I’d like to open the call with some comments on the industry outlook and offshore development activity where we see the opportunities for Ocean Power Technologies and what we’re working on now. Then I’ll pass the call to Matt Shafer, our Chief Financial Officer, for a review of our financials and then we’ll open the call for questions. We’re seeing what we believe to be signs of building demand for our PowerBuoy solutions compared to just six months ago. In particular, we’re addressing many more new requests for proposals and information predominantly within the offshore oil and gas market, which would use our PowerBuoys in their operations. Despite what appears to be signs of stabilizing oil prices, the offshore oil and gas market continues to aggressively cut costs in offshore operations to competitively meet demand along with onshore oil and gas, while also addressing alternative forms of energy. New technologies, such as unmanned stations and subsea drones enable safer, cleaner and less expensive remote land based operations over traditional methods, which use more expensive offshore vessels and crew. Likewise, the security and defense markets are constantly searching for new technologies to augment their operations. Our business development team received significant interest from a number of military and defense contractor participants at recent conferences like the Offshore Technology Conference in Houston and the Sea and Aerospace Exhibition in Washington D.C. over these past few months. While the team is busy tracking down these opportunities, we’re also excited to progress our work with the Office of Naval Research upon receipt of next phase funding. Interestingly, the Department of Energy is turning its focus to autonomous ocean wave power. Recently the DOE solicited input to a draft maritime market report where wave energy devices maybe used to…

Thank you, George and morning everyone. First, the quarter, we recorded $222,000 in revenue during the fourth quarter ended April 30, 2018, while revenue in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 was $250,000. The decrease over the prior year was due to the timing of our start date on Eni contract versus the timing of our work with Mitsui Engineering and Shipbuilding, and Department of Defense, Office of Naval Research. The net loss for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 was $3.3 million as compared to a net loss of $2.6 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. The uptick in the net loss was mainly attributable to additional hiring of needed personnel, costs associated with our new headquarters in Monroe, the decrease in gains from the change in the fair value of the warrant liabilities and impacts from foreign currency exchange rates. These were slightly offset by increased interest income. Now, for the full year, revenue for the full fiscal year 2018 was $511,000 as compared to revenue of $843,000 for the 2017 full fiscal year. The net loss for the full fiscal year 2018 was $10.2 million as compared to net loss of $9.5 million for the full fiscal year 2017. The increase in net loss was primarily driven by the decrease in gains from the change in the fair value of warrant liabilities and gross margins. And also partially offset by the increase in the income tax benefit, interest income and foreign currency exchange impacts. Turning now to the balance sheet. As of April 30, 2018, total cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities were $12.3 million, up from $8.9 million on April 30, 2017. As of both April 30, 2018, restricted cash was $726,000. Net cash used in operating activities was $10.7 million during the 12 months ended April 30, 2018 as compared to $10 million for the prior year. During fiscal 2018, our net cash burn rate was approximately $900,000 per month. With that, I'll turn it back now to George.

Thanks, Matt. Before we move onto Q&A, I must say that I’m both proud and humbled by the strong team we built over the past year at Ocean Power Technologies. The depth of our engineering talent is unrivaled. Over the past year, we’ve strengthened our cutting-edge technology by implementing reliability enhancements, such as next-generation controls logic and enhanced power takeoff capabilities. We also developed and integrated a power and communications umbilical system for customer subsea equipment, such as for Eni. Our sales and marketing team continues to find new opportunities for our innovative solutions around the world. We're ushering in new sales and marketing processes and we’re pursuing new channel strategies, all of which will accelerate commercialization and transform our business toward a culture of commercial excellence, while maintaining OPT as the market leader in offshore wave power. Likewise, our support services have built what we believe our world-class policies and procedures to both enable growth, while maintaining strict compliance. In short, we are executing on our communicated strategy and we believe we've turned the corner toward sustainable revenues. As always, thank you for your time and support as we continue to build Ocean power Technologies to deliver to our customers. Operator, we’re now ready to take questions.

Thank you. We would like to open up the call for questions [Operator Instructions]. And our first question will come from the line of Peter Ruggiere with Dawson James. Your line is now open.

I’ve got a question for you, because there has been lot of conference calls we’ve been talking it on. How close do you feel like actually signing a meaningful, maybe three to four or five buoy -- 10 buoy contract?

Well, we believe that the Eni and Premier Oil contracts are extremely meaningful to us. They’re meaningful to those companies and they’re meaningful to us in terms of having commercial contracts in a brand new market segment that we didn’t have before. And we’re deploying for these customers in different parts of the world. In terms of a multi buoy order, we’re addressing RFPs on a daily basis. I can tell you that they’re not all for one buoy or two buoys. I think that what we’re going to see, Peter is an acceleration here now that we have a couple of buoys that are going in the water, we anticipate later this year at least that’s the plan, other companies are going to see the value in this, it’s a race to be second, which is typical with new technologies being deployed. And we’re going to start seeing more and more companies we believe come to the table to ask to use our buoys to help offset their operational cost. So we believe it’s coming, we believe it’s in the near future.

Because you guys have been around a long, long time in that and I don’t hear anything negative about you. I mean, the stock price is one thing, because I mean I think you don’t have debt, but I mean that’s the only negative is we’re all down to the shares…

Well, it wouldn’t make sense for us to necessarily have debt right until we have revenues to offset the debt coverage. And I will tell you that if you look back over the last three years, we have built products which the Company has never had before. We have developed markets around that product, which the Company never had. And now, we have launch customers that are at the table that want our products, they want our expertise and we feel that we have really turned that corner.

I have a client in mind that knows people at Premier and he’s surprised that the stock didn’t move when you actually when forward with it actually. The Premier, it looks like a multibillion dollar company, right?

I don’t exactly know off the top of my head what they’re worth, but they’re definitely a player in offshore oil and gas.

I have a question on something, I’ve read this through your 10-K. There was something with this Tide Runner Marine on --. What’s the story with that?

Tide Runner Marine is a New Jersey marine operations company out of Atlanta City that we have used in the past for deployments for our research and development purposes. And very plain and simple, we have a dispute over payments so we’re going to work it out with them through the quarters, really not much more that I can say about that.

And as far as the navy goes, what are the deadlines for that or maybe advancing to another phase? I forget off the top of my head.

We’re waiting for funding right now. The navy has been vocal with us that they like what we have done. We've achieved all necessary objectives in prior phases. And it's really just a matter of rolling out funding. We’re ready to move forward.

Any idea where that might take place?

Your guess is as good as mine. Right now, we’re in constant communication with them to understand what are the drivers and what are the triggers, and really know insights that that anybody else might have.

I think the stock price just trade -- your cash balance is right now is trading as if you have nothing, which is ridiculous to me anyway…

It really is. I mean, we believe that we’re undervalued. We’ve got great intellectual property. We’ve got burgeoning markets. We’ve got our customers that we’re working with and that are asking to potential work with us. So we are extremely optimistic here. We’re excited. There’s a buzz of energy here. We’re building buoys. It’s a really exciting time for us, because we're doing something that this company has never done before. And the entire organization has their hands in building this company, and it's just a really exciting time right now.

How many buoys do you have built so far?

We have four built. We've got two more that are being built…

Thank you. And the next question comes from the line of Robert Littlehale with JP Morgan. Your line is now open.

George, can you give us a sense of the timeline when you described sell, build, ship; how long that potentially takes?

Sell, build, ship is a -- it has become a mantra within our Company. It’s really become a battle cry internally. Before I address your question, if you think about the cultural change that a small established company like ours has to go through, in terms of switching our mindset from a totally R&D mentality to one of product focus, and most importantly customer focus. That battle cry, sell, build, ship, is all about what we want to focus on. And if you look at our internal processes, we’ve got a sales process that we’re looking to refine. And the more that we refine that, both internally as well as understanding our customers’ buying process, we’re able to condense the time to get to a sale. Likewise with build, when I say build, it's not just physically building buoy but it's all the engineering that has to happen with individual customers in customizing that buoy for that customers’ need. So for instance, with Eni, we had to design an umbilical that goes to the seafloor. And umbilical is nothing more than an extension cord that provides power and communications to the seafloor for their purposes. But we had to design and integrate this into the PowerBuoy and then we have to physically build it, and then ship naturally is what it is. But the timing for that we believe is going to accelerate. Right now, we are selling, building and shipping. And when I say sell, it could be either renting a buoy or it could physically selling. And we are looking at selling, as well as continuing to rent power buoys. So that timeline is going to condense more and more. Right now, sales processes vary depending on the market that we're looking at. So for instance, it took…

It does. The Eni and Premier Oil are both leases. And have you announced what the lease terms are in terms of the length of the lease?

Yes, we have but I will reiterate it. So for Eni, the initial project is two years, its six months of upfront engineering, buoy build, ship prepared for deployment and then deploy and install, and then the actual deployment is for a year and half. And that’s not to say that Eni doesn’t capture the information that they need earlier than a year and half. But the project is scheduled for a year and half deployment. At which time, it could be either continued for another year and half. They may decide to buy the buoy. I mean, as time marches on in these deployments, it makes more economic sense for our customers to actually buy the buoy outright then to continue to lease it, but it also depends on what their operational objectives are as well. And likewise with Premier Oil what we have ultimately is an initial nine-month lease. We have an upfront three-month trial period where Eni is looking very hard at, does the buoy do what we say it will do. We’re all confident on both sides, both Premier and us, we’re confident at will. But we’re putting buoy in the North Sea. It’s designed to operate in that type of harsh environment. It’s going in the water in the mid to late fall in through the winter time. We feel confident that it’s going to operate very well. In fact, it’s those types of conditions where power generation is at its optimum. So during that first three months, we’ll work with Premier, at which point once we prove that the Bouy does what it says it will do, it will continue on for another six months. And then there is an option to extend and also to buy the buoy after that. There are -- with both parties, we’re also looking at other opportunities to use PowerBouy’s within their operations. So this naturally opens up discussions for other opportunities.

The uses of the two lease contracts are different between Eni and Premier. Can you just quickly review that for us?

In our commercialization presentation that we gave a few months ago, I laid out three discrete areas or applications that we’re looking to address, one is subsea charging; so delivering power to the sea floor for operations that are happening on the sea floor; equipment that needs to be powered; data that needs to be collected, et cetera. And that’s what the Eni project is doing, subsea charging. Ultimately, they would like to use our PowerBouy with subsea charging of autonomous underwater vehicles. So essentially creating -- charging cages that these AUVs can go into charge their batteries, upload data back to our buoy, which we can then send to land. And then download new mission profiles for the autonomous underwater vehicles. That way you’re not sending ships out to recover the AUVs, charge their batteries and deal with data, everything is happening real fine. With Premier Oil, and the second area of applications is surveillance and monitoring, and that’s really what Premier oil is all about. They have these platforms that need to be decommissioned. After a certain amount of time of use, just like any capital equipment, it needs to be decommissioned. And this actually becomes a construction project, if you will, that’s offshore and they need to create safe zones around these construction projects where they’re taking down these platforms. They can have any vessels coming within any near proximity of the platform, as well as the subsea equipment. So historically, offshore oil and gas has used vessels. They will actually put vessels out there, 24/7, for weeks sometimes months at a time, switching them on and off with crew, in order to protect these zones. Well, the value play that we bring to the table is unmanned platform that’s what our PowerBouy is. We have power.…

Thank you. If there are no additional questions, I would like to turn the call back to Mr. George Kirby.

Thank you, operator. And again, I want to thank everybody for joining the call. I want thank everyone for your support. Please follow us all the great things that we’re doing and we look forward to talking to you next quarter.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This concludes the program and you may all disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.