Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Osisko Gold Royalties Q1 2018 Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. Please note that this call is being recorded today, May 4, 2018 at 10:00 AM Eastern Time. Today on the call we have Mr. Sean Roosen, Chair of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Osisko Gold Royalties; and Mr. Bryan Coates, President of Osisko Gold Royalties. I would now like to turn the meeting over to our host for today's call, Mr. Sean Roosen.

Welcome everybody to the first quarter conference call of our financial results for the first quarter of 2018. We're going to be following the PowerPoint that's found on our website called Q1 Results. There is a disclaimer page on the front of this PowerPoint. We will be making forward-looking statements, and I would refer you to that statement to -- for the disclaimers required. So, we want to start the call today a little bit different than usual. Given that our friends from Barkerville have published their main resource yesterday, the best question of the day will be receiving a pair of Barkerville gold cuff links. So on to the main event. For the first quarter of the year, we had 20,000 ounces of GEOs, gold equivalent ounces, which fits in with our annual guidance of 77,000 to 80,000 ounces of GEOs. Cash operating margins were at 91%, the highest in the Precious Metal sector. And we generated $29.5 million of additional cash operating, and we also had from our off-take agreements a $2.4 billion delivered. Record cash flows from operating at $23.3 million, a 94% increase over Q1 2017. We also executed the investment of $148 million of Victoria Gold Eagle Project in the Yukon. $98 million of that purchase a 5% royalty, which will deliver 10,000 ounces per year of gold thus a very significant add to our asset base and a Canadian asset, fully permitted, under construction as we speak. We were also able to convert the Matilda Gold off-take to a royalty of 1.65%. It's a dream start. And we monetized about $25.6 million of equities, realizing a -- a realized gain of $15.5 million. And one of the things that I do want to highlight today is that from the investment in our accelerator companies…

Thanks, Elif. So obviously balance sheet is in great shape, we have quite a bit of liquidity, quite a bit of firepower on our balance sheet. So, we are able to continue on and provide a look our actions 2018. And we are in a position to execute if we see fit, on any investment that looks like it meets our criteria. On Page 10, we are on our 15th consecutive quarter of returning capital to shareholders. We believe that this brings a level of discipline to how we run our business. And we are very proud to be one of the companies that paid a dividend in the second quarter of existence when we started this company in June 2014. One of our priorities was to be a top-end dividend payer within the space. And we are currently yielding 1.6% to the market, which is within the top five companies in this space in terms of dividend yield. So not only do we have good underpinning asset value, we are also paying everybody to stay with us in a very aggressive fashion compared to the rest of the space. Page 11. I want to go through the acquisition that we executed with Victoria Gold, our new partner. We currently own 50.5% of the company, and we have a 5% top line royalty on the asset. That's an asset that is fully permitted and is currently under construction. John McConnell and his team are highly capable people. They've built lots of mines in the North before. I met Mr. McConnell when I worked at Nanisivik back in the '80s. And he was my manager then, which was on Baffin Island. Couldn't be a better GM to operate in the Yukon than John McConnell and his crew. We financed the company…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Kerry Smith with Haywood Securities.

Sean, just one thing, one question kind of on a more strategic level. With competition is pretty fierce for the sort of things in [OR] royalties in the gold and silver space. Do you see much opportunity for you to find royalties, or creating royalties in, say the [coal boil] lithium, graphite space and kind of esoteric mine or metals, but it just seems like the competition is pretty stiff for the precious metals stream? I just wondered what the deal flow might be like in those other specialty metals.

Good question, Kerry. Obviously, we're the first one to press a deal on our royalty, 5% top line royalty of Victoria this year. So, competition being what it may, we've been in the front. In terms of alternative metals, we look at them from a strategic base quite often. We haven't executed anything in that space to date, but we are active and aware of it. And as you will know, a lot of the crude that was for Osisko Gold Royalties came from [Cambior]. They built [indiscernible] and they have a fairly good view on specialty metals. So, we are aware and gainful about operating within that space. And we will take them as they come, but we have not executed anything yet. But that doesn't mean that it won't happen in the future.

Okay. And just a second question. Can you remind me the timing of -- how the buyback works on the Pretium stream and the offtake? Just remind me of the timing on that if it's going to happen [indiscernible].

No. The Pretium offtake, they have several conditions on the offtake that are important to remember. They can't execute the offtake until December 31, 2018 at which point they would be paying us $116 million. Once again there, they have to retire all of the debt held by Orion. So, until the debt deal is done, they can't execute the buyback. And there is a second day, December 31, 2019, at which point in time they pay us in excess of $130 million, same conditions apply. Two things noteworthy, we also own an offtake agreement for 50% of the gold that's produced by the mine that we market. We have a six day look back window on those gold purchases. And if you look at our offtake win, we had about $2.4 million of gain to the offtake agreement. A lot of that came from the Pretium offtake. Another note on the Pretium buyback is that should the company be sold before those buybacks are executed, we would split a, I think it's just over 13% of the gross sale value of the company between ourselves and the other offtake agreement. So, we have many ways to get recurrence on Pretium between here and now. If those offtakes do not get executed and the company does not get sold, we would start to receive -- we would try to receive our stream in 2020. Quite happy to fill you in on more detail on that. If anybody wants to send in a note, we're -- all the information is public. But we'll give you a summary on how the deal works if that helps. But we think that Pretium, it's always been a question of the stability of the resource. We think that Pretium is going to have quarter-by-quarter sort of up and down because of the way the ore body works, but in the overall basis, this is a world-class asset. It's going to perform. And a lot of the value back gets executed or not, we're strongly rooted to the Pretium project. We think that there's lots of upside in the Valley of the Kings and in the Golden Triangle in general. And we think that, this is the very beginning of the redevelopment of the Golden Triangle. So, we're quite keen on the asset, quite keen on the overall camp play there.

Your next question comes from the line of Carey MacRury with Canaccord Genuity. Your line is open.

You mentioned the 150,000 ounces by 2023, I'm just wondering if you can give a bit of color on which assets do you see coming into production to drive that.

Sure. Obviously, we have in the shoot right now, we have the ramp up at Amulsar that is scheduled to happen in the fourth quarter of this year as they finish their construction. We have Pretium, we have Back Forty in there and we have Eagle, which is under construction as we speak. So, all these projects are fully financed and underway for the most part. And we expect to see those assets in the food chain between now and 2023.

And then second one. Victoria. We've seen a lot of the transactions that involve streams. I am just wondering was there something particular about why use the NSR model there rather than a stream?

I think at each company has their preferred model. For us, royalties are more [indiscernible] and efficient. And we prefer them for their simplicity. And I think from a management standpoint, the royalties are quite straightforward, and the Yukon asset. So, most of these deals are tailored around the jurisdictional regulation that makes the most advantage. So, in terms of where it fits for us, it's a 100% margin gold. So, it's obviously very good for us and for the company. It's the most efficient way to get to capital as they require to build this asset. And we partnered up with cash flow and finance. Orion and ourselves delivered a full package of $500 million here. So that, I think in terms of how you look at project financing at the end of the day, it's about the asset, and all of the financing is related to the asset. And this was the combination of what's the best for this situation.

Your next question comes from the line of Dan Rollins with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open.

Sean, just on that last question, when you speak about Brucejack, are you including the stream or you assuming that's been bought back and it's just the offtake in that 150 sort of number?

If you look at our presentation Dan, we've always shown it assuming that the Brucejack buyback has occurred, which represents about 20,000 ounces a year by the time we get to 2023. If it doesn't happen, then we would add 20,000 ounces to our assumptions.

Perfect. And then just with respect to the deal flow going forward, if we look at more a precious metal-focused opportunity, what do you see out there in the pipeline? I guess, three to six months ago, it would have been more development-stage opportunities. Obviously, you pulled the trigger on Victoria there. But do you see the pipeline still pretty good right now? Or are you starting to see a bit of a wane in the opportunities?

Well, obviously, the performance of current equity markets that set the stage for royalty and streaming. I don't think anybody can achieve much very good financing through equity offerings at this point in time. As you would be well aware Dan, the amount of equity deals that have been executed in 2018 are close to zero. So, the only thing that's getting done right now, I believe, are equity associated with stream and royalty deals, debt deals and just try to take back loans is really the only sorts of financing for development projects right now. So, we see it very much as a development market. And so, the equity market held us back up. But we know that there are probably 100 companies that need to do equity deals right now and that haven't been able to get any traction on equity at the office. So, we focused on combining with our partners to do full financing offers, where we're providing everything that we need to do. We're seeing an awful lot of discussion about M&A that often requires the injection of cash in the transaction to make it work. So, we see both M&A and project financing being the business of 2018. And I don't think there is any shortage of opportunity. If I had a dollar for every call that I got to be in an equity deal this quarter, I'd probably be golfing with you, Dan.

And then just with the -- you mentioned your partners and the full financing package. Before, the royalty stream would have been there with equity, with the debt component, the equity component is not there. Do see yourselves working with Caterpillar in the future, potentially, Orion in the future and maybe other parties to offer this full-fledged financing package? And how would you compare your ability to do that relative to your peers right now?

I think we're in pretty good shape, Dan. The -- our traditional relationships have been with SCSQ, Canada [indiscernible], CPPIB and obviously Orion is now a big shareholder of Osisko. And then we've had good partners in terms of everything we've done with BlackRock Fidelity, LNG. [indiscernible] especially is a very great supporter. And also, Franklin out of California. So, we think that, on a debt provisional basis, we have several partners we can work with. We want to be part of a full solution because there is no use of having a royalty on a partially financed project. You need 100% financing sort of royalty to have value. And as you know, we also -- we like to partner up with groups in technical support. And our technical team is still very much intact and reactive to the accelerator companies. We've been able to preserve all of our technical capacity. [indiscernible] is leading the charge over at Falco, but we have mine building, and we operated the largest exploration program in the world last year with 41 rig strength. So, we have quite a bit of depth on the bench in terms of drillers and exploration transitional to develop a staged project. As you saw, we just drilled out at Barkerville and we are currently -- Windfall has been drilled down. And we're getting ready to announce the resource sale. We delivered the feasibility study on Falco. So, you'll ask about a lot of fronts, and we've kept our technical integrity alive. And I think that we're a catalyst investor that debt lenders and people who are maybe not as technical as us would like to have in the mix for project financing. So that's where we see our niche is that we can be an elite on a project financing. We can provide technical oversight for the group as the lead financier in these segments. And for the companies that we're investing in, it gives them some peer review as the best on the bench for any technical services that they may as a single-asset company not have available to them. So, I think we're pretty happy with how our business is set up, Dan. It's taken a little bit of while for the market to adjust to it, but I don't think there is any debt at this point in time that's close to what our model is coming to bear, especially the downtick market like we're in right now.

Your next question is from the line of Mike Jalonen with Bank of America.

Sean, but I just -- a lot of my questions were answered, but actually one that's kind of struck me on Page 12, 13, your geographic diversification. Obviously, you have a couple of assets. Few in South America, 1 in Armenia, but you are obviously very North American-centric. Is there any thought process to go in afar and like some of your -- like Franco's quite into Australia now? So just -- and Wheaton is into LatAm a little along with Franco. Just wonder what your thought process is there.

Well, Mike as you know, we've had quite a bit of success in Canada. And I think that we -- two of our accelerator companies have generated significant opportunity within Canada. Our accelerator companies collectively control over 10,000 square kilometers of mineral licenses in Canada. So that's the best where we start. Every investment aside of that is really about the operator. I know -- I'm not too concerned about the jurisdiction, but if we're with the right partner who understands and can manage that jurisdiction, we are quite willing to go with them. And I'd certainly love to see companies that are operating in those jurisdictions who are quite willing to participate financially as long as the corporate has the integrity for the jurisdictions that they are in. So, we'll be looking more at that. But as you know, we just did another Canadian deal in Q1. We led the charge. I don't think there's been another significant royalty deal done so far this year. So, we're first out of the gate, again. We did the biggest deal [Indiscernible] last year. And we got a good start on 2018, and again, with Canadian assets. So, we will stay on the Canadian team, but once we leave Canada, it's really about the operator.

Okay. Maybe just one follow-up. How many more companies would you add to your accelerator line-up there? I think you have around 10, if I'm counting right. What's the optimum number, because you said you get that call everyday now?

I think where we are, Mike is that, as long as we see value and we can contribute -- we don't do these incubator or accelerator companies unless we have market participation alongside of us. So, we'll follow a bit the market, what they want us to do. As you saw, we created Osisko Metals last year to participate in the zinc plays. We are -- we've also added Minera Alamos in Mexico to our portfolio. And now, we've added Victoria, where we own 50.5%. As long as there are good companies with good management teams, with good ideas, we're going to be there all day, every day. And I don't think there is a limit to how many we would do, but there is a limit to how much our equity book would be. I don't think that we want to see our equity book expand much further in terms of dollar value than what it is now. So, what I would say to you is that we're probably at a sell something to buy something stage with our equity book at this point. And we want to recirculate that cash. So just to reiterate, if you look at our equity book right now, we have $382 million invested. But in the last three years, we've already have realized gains of $70 million. And the royalties that we earned in that we invested $90 million in [indiscernible] royalties, because generally speaking, the only time we own an equity is if we've done a royalty or streaming opportunity. And the value of that $90 million investment into royalty streams that we've earned on the way into this is well in excess of $200 million. So, in -- the way we look at it, Mike, is that our accelerator model has…

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.