Good morning and welcome to the Ormat Technologies’ First Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note that this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Josh Carroll with Alpha IR. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Hosting the call today are Doron Blachar, Chief Executive Officer and Assi Ginzburg, Chief Financial Officer and Smadar Lavi, Vice President of Investor Relations and ESG Planning and Reporting. Before beginning, we’d like to remind you that the information provided during this call may contain forward-looking statements relating to current expectations, estimates, forecast and projections about future events that are forward-looking as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements generally relate to the company’s plans, objectives and expectations for future operations and are based on management’s current estimates and projections, future results or trends. Actual future results may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risk and uncertainties. For a discussion of such risks and uncertainties, please see risk factors as described in Ormat Technologies annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q that are filed with the SEC. In addition, during the call, the company will present non-GAAP financial measures such as adjusted EBITDA. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures and management reasons for presenting such information is set forth in the press release that was issued last night as well as in the slides posted on the website. Because these measures are not calculated in accordance with GAAP, they should not be considered in isolation from the financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. Before I turn the call over to management, I would like to remind everyone that a slide presentation accompanying this call maybe accessed on the company’s website at ormat.com under the presentation link that’s found on the Investor Relations tab. With all that said, I would now like to turn the call over to Ormat’s CEO, Doron Blachar. Doron?

Thank you, Josh. Good morning, everyone and thank you for joining us today. We began 2025 with a strong first quarter, achieving a 2.5% increase in revenue, a 4.6% rise in net income attributable to the company’s stockholders, and a record quarterly adjusted EBITDA growth of 6.4% compared to the first quarter of last year. This growth was driven by robust performance and significant expansion in both our storage and product segments year-over-year. In our storage segment, our strategic approach to maintaining approximately 50% market exposure has yielded favorable outcomes. We benefited from stable contracted revenues due to the bottleneck tolling agreement, while on the other hand, capitalized on higher merchant prices and additional capacity in the PGA market due to the colder winter weather. This improved performance was supported by revenue generation from our expanded portfolio, notably our East Leamington, Montague, and Bottleneck energy storage facilities, which commenced commercial operation in 2024. Despite near-term uncertainty in energy storage project development due to tariff changes and IRA uncertainty, we believe we will continue to see a solid performance in our storage segment throughout 2025 and 2026 due to the progress in securing safe harbor and batteries with low tariffs. Despite a slight year-over-year decline in our Electricity segment due to curtailments in California and Nevada, our geothermal operations have continued to deliver consistent, solid performance and results in line with our expectations. We are optimistic about the growth potential of our geothermal business in 2025 and beyond, supported by potential easing of project permitting timelines, increased focus on geothermal exploration, strong demand for baseload renewable sources, and high PPA pricing. I am pleased to announce that we have signed an agreement to acquire the 20 megawatt Blue Mountain geothermal power plant from CERC Energy for $88 million, subject to standard…

Thank you, Doron. Let me start my review of our financial highlights on Slide 6. Total revenue for the first quarter was $229.8 million, a 2.5% increase compared to last year’s first quarter. This top line expansion was driven by strong performance in our storage and product segment offset by a reduction in the electricity segment. Gross profit for the first quarter was $72.9 million, down 7.5% from $78.8 million in the first quarter of 2024, resulting in a consolidated gross margin of 31.7% versus 35.2% last year. The decline was largely due to the electricity segment gross margin decrease, partially offset by improved performance in storage and product segments. Net income attributable to the company’s stockholders was $40.4 million, or $0.66 per diluted share compared to $38.6 million, or $0.64 per diluted share, in the first quarter of the prior year. Adjusted net income attributable to the company’s stockholders was $41.5 million, or $0.68 per diluted share, an increase of 4.8% and 4.6%, respectively. Adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter was $150.3 million, a 6.4% increase compared to last year. The strong year-over-year increase was driven by a better performance in our energy storage segment and improved profitability in our product segment, leading to a quarterly record adjusted EBITDA in Ormat history. Slide 6 breaks down the revenue performance at the segment level. Electricity segment revenues for the first quarter decreased by 5.8% to $180.2 million. This decline was due to the anticipated curtailment in Nevada from third-party transmission maintenance and curtailment in California due to wildfire. The decline was partially offset by the performance of the Bhiwadi power plant, which completed its upgrade in 2024 and is operating under improved PPA prices starting Q1 2025. Product segment revenues increased by 27.9% to $31.8 million during the first quarter…

Thank you, Assi. Turning to Slide 12 for a look at our electricity segment operating portfolio. Portfolio growth during the quarter was positively supported by the recent COD of the Ijen Geothermal Power Plant, which we jointly own with PT Medco Power Indonesia. As we noted during our fourth quarter call, the Ijen facility began operations of its first phase, delivering 35 megawatts to the Java grid with our share of the facility being 17 megawatts. We also recently signed a 10-year PPA with Calpine Energy Solutions for up to 15 megawatts of carbon-free geothermal capacity at favorable terms. This PPA will replace the current lower-priced PPA with Southern California Edison for MAMOS II in the first quarter of 2027. Let’s move to Slide 13 for an update on the operations of the electricity segment. At our Puna power plant in Hawaii, we are conducting maintenance work on one of the wells, which will result in a temporary decrease in electricity generation in the second quarter of 2025. This decrease is expected to negatively impact second quarter revenues and EBITDA by approximately $4 million and net profit by approximately $3 million. Additionally, we anticipate continued curtailment in the U.S. due to the maintenance work on the NV Energy transmission line, as previously announced. Despite these impacts, we do not anticipate any changes to our annual guidance for revenues and EBITDA due to the expected completion of the Blue Mountain project acquisition by the end of the second quarter and improved profitability and EBITDA in our product and storage sectors. Before moving on to the product segment, I would like to inform you of a recent management decision. Given the expansion in the number of power plants we own, our expected organic and M&A growth and the significant interest in drilling…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Justin Clare with ROTH Capital. Please go ahead.

Yes. Hi. Thanks for taking our questions. I wanted to start out here just on the storage project development pipeline. And I am wondering it sounds like you had all of the batteries for 2025 and 2026 projects already imported before the significant increase in tariffs. But when we look a little further out, how could your development of storage projects be affected? Are you slowing anything down and kind of waiting to see how the supply chain develops? Maybe you could just share a little bit about what you are seeing now.

Thank you. Thank you, Justin. So, first of all, we need to see how the tariff will settle down at what price. What percentage and how it will impact the different countries. But regardless of this, we see multiple alternatives to acquire batteries from different locations, not just from China. We are in contact with a few battery manufacturers that are building manufacturing facilities in the U.S. and are willing already to commit to sell batteries from the U.S., that would also have a potentially a benefit of the IRA, of the made in the U.S. benefits. So, we see that the market is getting ready to work on the dealing with this tariff. Internally, we are continuing all of our business development efforts, buying land as needed, interconnection, developing the project, getting them ready to project release once we have a better and clear understanding of the tariffs and the IRA issues. And the last element that we are doing is, we are developing projects also in Israel. We have two very large tenders that we won in Israel. Both the tenders are 300 megawatts, 1200 megawatt-hour, and our share is 50% of that. In addition to that, we have additional projects that we are developing in Israel. So, I think if you look at all around, we are continuing. We do believe that the energy storage market will continue to grow. It might be a different balancing point between cost and pricing, but we see that other developers, as well as all the battery manufacturers, are getting prepared to significant tariffs, but still maintain low pricing.

Got it. Okay. Very helpful. And then just wanted to check in on how the tariffs may affect your cost for geothermal. I believe that your equipment is manufactured in Israel and then would be subject to the 10% universal tariff, so just wanted to confirm that. And then just how much of the impact could that have on the total CapEx for geothermal plants?

All-in-all, the impact is not material, because when you look into the cost of the – CapEx of a power plant, it starts with the exploration, which is pure U.S., then the development and drilling, all of that is pure U.S. power. So, the power that comes from Israel might be 25%, maybe 30% of the total cost. So, if you add to that 10%, the general and worldwide tariff, it’s not very material. Israel had a 3% tariff before that. And all-in-all, it’s not that material. And on top of that, we see the increase in PPA pricing that more than compensates this increase.

Alright. Okay. That makes sense. And then just one final one on the EGS technology, just wondering if you could talk about potential timing in which that technology might be implemented. And then do you see that as more expanding the opportunity set in terms of where you could develop geothermal plants, or did I hear you say that you could actually enhance the performance of existing plants? Is that a possible opportunity?

I would say both. If we have power plants that have the capability to generate more electricity, so building an EGS – drilling some EGS wells, using EGS technology, what might increase the output of these facilities that we already have. On the EGS technology, I would say that, we are working with partners and others to develop some technology and we will have some more information to update as we progress with this. However, we need to take into account that there are still technological challenges. It’s not just a question of the cost of the drilling, it’s a question of how much water you use, how much water you lose during working on operating the EGS facility. How the rocks cool due to the water that is running on them, so there are still some technological issues. But if and when the EGS technology will be available, I see that as a very nice upside to Ormat. We will be able to develop much more power plants in more locations and not just be tied to specific locations.

Okay. I appreciate it. Thank you.

The next question comes from the line of Mark Strouse with JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Hey. This is Michael Fairbanks on for Mark. Maybe just ignoring potential changes to the IRA for a second. Are you hearing anything from a policy or a regulatory perspective that you think could help speed up the development of greenfield geothermal in the U.S.?

Yes, I think it’s a great question. A couple of weeks ago, the Ventura issued an executive order dealing with permitting on BLM land, basically issuing a new – I don’t think it’s exactly a new NIPA, but basically replacing the current process, a process that used to take us between 1 year to 3 years under the order. It should take between 14 days to 28 days. So, since the order was issued, we have been working to prepare all the relevant new documentation to file it and see how the process works. It’s the new process, so not everybody knows exactly how the outcome will be, but we are definitely pushing forward all of our greenfields that are eligible for this, but it’s only on Federal land., to move forward, getting the relevant permits, drilling permits to expedite the development of greenfields in the U.S.

Great. And then maybe just as a follow-up, given the strong quarter on storage and some of the headwinds in electricity, do you have an updated view on where gross margins should shake out for those segments for the year and maybe just how that progresses throughout the year?

So, as we said in our prepared remarks, storage margin this year is going to be on the – towards the higher end of 20%. Initially, we thought at the beginning of the year that it would be slightly less than that. We also said in the prepared remarks that the Product segment is moving up from 18% to 20% initially to 19% to 21%. I think on the Electricity segment we still need to finalize the numbers as it will move because of curtailment, but we are seeing few points lower versus last year.

Okay. Thank you.

The next question comes from the line of Noah Kaye with Oppenheimer. Please go ahead.

Hi there. This is Andre Adams on for Noah. Congrats on the Blue Mountains acquisition agreement. It sounds like you have a couple of value creation levers there. Could you give us some parameters on expected EBITDA contribution from the asset as it stands today, and what timing and investment costs might be on the capacity expansion and solar project, and what the contribution revenue and EBITDA would be once completed?

So, first, good morning, this is Assi. I will start by saying that this is a very important introduction to Ormat, because it shows how we can continue to grow in the U.S. and enhance assets. Second, we will provide more detailed information once we would own the asset, but as always, this asset’s EBITDA multiple is a lower-double digit. And once we complete the lower-double digit multiple and once we complete all the upgrade, we are expecting it to go down significantly anywhere from 30% to 40%, like we did in the prior transaction. I would also point out that it has a relatively short PPA, which is by the year of 2029. In this case, it’s a big upside, as the current prices are materially above PPA prices, all historical prices that we have seen in geothermal for many, many years. And therefore, that will be another upside that once we complete the transaction, and have a new PPA in 2029 and forward, 2030 and forward, it will be another upset to the number. I would say that on timing, the first step will be to enhance the facility and to add 3.5 megawatts. And that’s one we can start doing once we have the facility on hand and we don’t need any special approvals for it. On the other hand, in order to add the solar, which is the key component for additional performance of this asset, we will need approval from the off-taker. And we believe that over time we can get it because this off-taker in the past agreed for new PPAs that will allow solar. Hopefully that answered the question.

Yes. Thank you so much. And on the topic of PPA pricing and conversations, if you could just give us an update on PPA talks with hyperscalers in particular and how much of the post-2029 re-contracting opportunity you now have line of sight to for the existing portfolio.

On the re-contracting and the PPA pricing, they remain high. I would say that the current changes in the market hasn’t impacted the demand for geothermal. We see PPA pricing above 100 for microscalers, as well as from utilities companies, as well as from PPAs. I think it’s across the industry, PPA is above 100. We are negotiating multiple PPAs. Once we will sign a PPA, we will obviously issue a press release and announce it to the market. But I can say that all of our negotiations have advanced since the last time we spoke, and hopefully we will be able to announce one once we sign it soon.

Great. Thank you so much. I will pass it on.

The next question comes from the line of David Anderson with Barclays. Please go ahead.

Great. Thank you and good morning. It’s sort of more of a conceptual question. So, we are hearing about the hyperscalers and data center demand is increasing. And obviously higher PPA prices put you in a good position, but overall you don’t have a lot of contracting option, really over the next 5 years of all your assets. Just curious how you are – what are some of the leverage you have to capture some of that higher PPA? You mentioned the M&A, that takes a little longer. Are there other M&A opportunities out there? How are you thinking about greenfield? And then you have mentioned a few times EGS. I am just kind of curious where you are on that. So, how can we capture this sort of – this market dynamic today in your numbers?

Look, we have increased significantly our exploration activities over the last 2 years. And we see quite a few greenfields that are in advanced exploration stages and should get to the market in ‘28 and ‘29 and onwards. All of these greenfields will be under this new PPA regime. Of the higher PPAs, some of them will probably go to hyperscalers. Some will go to utilities. Others might be a three-way contract between Ormat, hyperscaler and the utility. But the most utilizing better the PPA will be through these new greenfields coming online, as well as reconstructing. Blue Mountain is one at the end of 2019, but we have Stillwater and Salt Wells that are also coming online, and we see this demand increase. Regarding EGS, as I have said, we are focusing on a few new technologies and new investments that we are looking into the EGS, as well as developing some specific with partners of EGS processes and technologies. And once we will have something more concrete, we will announce to the market.

So, on that exploration you are talking about, presumably that’s going to be developed with your binary cycle current techniques. I am just curious on the exploration side. I know you have an agreement with Schlumberger or a partnership, I am not exactly sure what it is. Perhaps you can talk about how you see them helping you get there. I am assuming there is potential for efficiencies and completions and all that. I am just – could you talk through a little bit on that exploration and how you get to commerciality?

Yes. So, exploration, as you said, all of our power plants that we build are built based on the binary on Ormat Technologies, so we build them ourselves to us. We do not use third-party technology. We believe our technology is superior to others. Regarding Schlumberger, we have a cooperation agreement with them on developing new projects that either us or them could bring to the table. Obviously, once a project will come from this collaboration, they will do the drilling. We will do the above-ground construction, and that will increase our product sales on one hand, and if it will be an Ormat project, and Ormat growth numbers, Electricity segment.

Interesting. Thank you.

Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] Your next question comes from the line of Ben Kallo with Baird. Please go ahead.

Hey. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. Just first, as we look at your ‘28 targets, there are several moving pieces with higher PPA prices maybe than you anticipated, and then maybe some uncertainty in energy storage. I am just wondering – I mean we are still in ‘25, but how you guys are thinking about your ability to meet those targets at this point? Then I have a follow-up.

Hi and welcome to join us.

Thank you.

When we looked at the 2028 targets based on the geothermal and the energy storage, we have a detailed plan internally that lists all the potential projects that will come online. We know what we ar edrilling today on the geothermal part, what exploration, on what sites we are doing exploration, Obviously, we know that there is not 100% success, so we are using some statistics over there to see which one will come online. And on the energy storage part, we have announced all the ‘25, ‘26 projects. We have now also mentioned the two Israeli large, very large projects that we are building. We have additional projects that we are building in Israel. And we are continuing to develop projects in the U.S. to be ready once the uncertainty of the tariff and the IRA will go away. I will tell you that the fact that there is uncertainty is not a mystery, and we are negotiating with some of our potential customers, taking into account this uncertainty and sharing the risk with our customers in order to continue and develop the project. But I don’t think that the energy storage in the U.S. is going to disappear regardless of the outcome of the tariff or the IRA. I believe it’s going to get to a new structure, maybe a new steady state. If CapEx will be a bit higher, then pricing will be higher. We do see a continuous reduction in battery prices. that offset some of the interest in the tariffs. So, I believe it will continue. But we do have a detailed plan how to get to the 2028 end of the year target that we put for both geothermal and the energy storage.

Thank you. I appreciate that. Just maybe if you could expand on the electricity restructure you mentioned like, what the change is operationally or financially or anything that you can give there.

Yes. Thank you. Over the last couple of years, we have increased our fleet through acquisition of the Enel assets and now the Blue Mountain assets and organic growth that we have and the growth that we see coming in the next few years. And in parallel to that, we increased significantly the exploration and drilling. This year we are planning around $150 million of capital only on exploration and drilling. We believe we will keep the same level in the coming years. And as such, and in order to respond to the great demand in the U.S., I thought it was right to have two separate management members focused and dedicated on these two. On one hand, maintaining and increasing the performance of the Electricity segment, and on the other hand, making sure that the drilling is efficient, resource is working across multiple sites at the same time, and also have the ability to focus on EGS in addition. So, it’s a way for Ormat to get more aligned with the market demand and to be able to respond to the market demand for renewable electricity.

Great. Thank you guys very much.

Thank you.

I will now turn the call back over to Doron Blachar for closing remarks. Please go ahead.

Thank you all for joining us on the call today and your continuous support. We see the increased demand for renewable energy. We see the increased support from the administration for geothermal, for developing geothermal across the U.S. And we are doing everything that we can in order to capture this potential and translate it into profitable growth. So, thank you all.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today’s call. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.