Hello everyone, and welcome to OUTFRONT Media’s Third Quarter 2024 Earnings Call. My name is Lydia, and I will be your operator today. After the prepared remarks, there will be an opportunity for you to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] I’ll now hand you over to Stephan Bisson, Vice President of Investor Relations, to begin. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and thank you for joining our 2024 third quarter earnings call. With me on the call today are Jeremy Male, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Matthew Siegel, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. After a discussion of our financial results, we’ll open the lines for a question-and-answer session. Our comments today will refer to the earnings release and the slide presentation that you can find on the Investor Relations section of our website, outfront.com. After today’s call is concluded, a replay will be available there as well. This conference call may include forward-looking statements. Relevant factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements are listed in our earnings materials and in our SEC filings, including our 2023 Form 10-K and our September 30, 2024 Form 10-Q, which will be filed later today. We will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures on this call. Any references to OIBDA made today will be on an adjusted basis. Reconciliations of OIBDA and other non-GAAP financial measures are in the appendix of the slide presentation, the earnings release and on our website, which also includes presentations with prior period reconciliations. Also, please note that given the June sale of our Canadian business, our consolidated third quarter results do not include any Canada results, compared to the comparable prior year period. Detailed historical financial results of the divested Canadian business can be found on Slide 25 of our slide presentation and detailed historical U.S. Media financial results can be found on Slide 24. Given the sale of our Canadian business, our remarks today will focus primarily on the results of our U.S. Media segment. Let me now turn the call over to Jeremy.

Thank you, Stephan, and thanks to everyone for joining us on our call this morning. It's a pleasure to report our third quarter results today, our first period as a fully domestic company. As Stefan just mentioned and similar to last quarter, our remarks today will focus almost entirely on our U.S. Media segment. As you can see on Slide 3 which summarizes our headline results, our U.S. business grew revenues over 5% driven by an acceleration in our billboard growth and high single digit growth in transit. U.S. Media adjusted OIBDA grew just over 11% driven by the revenue growth I just described, combined with U.S. Media expense growth of just 3%. Together, U.S. Media incorporate adjusted OIBDA was up 6%. Consolidated AFFO grew nearly 7% to $81 million and puts us well on our way to achieving the high end of the growth target we laid out earlier this year. Our AFFO growth is impressive given that we are comparing against the seasonally strong quarter from last year that included our since divested Canadian business. On Slide 4 you can see our U.S. Media revenues in more detail. Billboard revenues were up 4.8%. Our strongest markets continue to be those that are more locally skewed, such as those in New Jersey, Texas and Michigan. Every region was up except the West, which improved sequentially but remained flattish due to some weakness in Los Angeles. Transit revenue was up 7.3% versus the prior year, driven by growth in all markets including the New York MTA. As has been the case all year, our improved transit revenues were the result of solid performances from both our local and national teams. The breakdown of local and national revenues in our U.S. Media business can be seen on Slide 5. Local remained the primary driver of our growth, up almost 7%. National revenues improved from Q2 levels and were up a little over 3%. On a consolidated basis. Our best performing categories in the third quarter were Retail, Tech, Utilities, Telecom, Legal and Government Political. On the weaker side were also Health, Medical, Alcohol, and Education. Slide 6 illustrates our solid U.S. Media billboard yield growth, up almost 7% year-over-year, reaching just under $3,000. The drivers of this yield growth remain dour digital conversions, rates, occupancy and higher automated transaction revenue. Slide 7 highlights our strong U.S. Media digital performance with revenue growing 10% in the quarter, representing over 32% of our total revenues, up from 31% last year. US digital billboard was up over 11% while transit was up just over 8%, again driven predominantly by the MTA. Automated revenues comprised nearly 17% of our total digital revenues in the quarter. About 7% of our digital transit revenue came from automated channels, up from just under 2% last year, reinforcing our belief that the MTA's digital network is well aligned for automated selling. With that, let me now hand it over to Matts to review the rest of the financials.

Thanks Jeremy and good morning everyone. As with Jeremy's remarks, most of my comments will focus on our U.S. Media segment as these are the primary operations going forward. For a deeper dive into our financial statements, please turn to Slide 8 for a more detailed look at our U.S. Media expenses. Total U.S. Media expenses were up just under $10 million or just over 3% year-over-year. U.S. Media billboard lease expense was up 1% versus last year. Small increases on a portion of our inventory on fixed rates were partially offset by lower revenues on the portion of our inventory operated on leases with revenue share arrangements primarily located in New York and Los Angeles. U.S. Media transit franchise expense was up 2% versus the prior year principally due to higher MAG payments to the MTA and higher revenues on contracts operated under revenue shares, partially offset by the non-renewal of a loss making contract and small benefits from amendments to the existing transit agreements. U.S. Media posting, maintenance and other expenses were up about 10% versus the prior year primarily due to higher compensation related expenses and an increase in business activity driving higher posting and rotation costs. U.S. Media SG&A expense grew less than 3% or just over $2 million during the quarter due to higher compensation related expenses partially offset by lower professional fees and smaller provision for doubtful accounts. Slide 9 provides additional detail on the sources of U.S. Media OIBDA. Total U.S. Media OIBDA was up 11% to just over $133 million. U.S billboard OIBDA was up 8% to $136 million, which represents a margin of 37.8%, up 110 basis points year-over-year. Transit OIBDA improved by about $3 million to a loss of just under $3 million. The improvement was primarily due to the…

Thanks very much, Matt. So, before we jump into revenue guidance for the fourth quarter, I want to mention a couple of recent developments which will impact comparability for the prior year, particularly as it relates to our billboard business. First, as many of you may have seen last month, we recently exited a billboard contract with the New York MTA, creating a revenue headwind for Q4. Importantly, and as implied by our full year AFFO guidance, we expect a de minimis impact to our OIBDA and AFFO this year. For 2025, it will continue to be a revenue headwind but also be very much margin enhancing. Secondly, the storms in the Southeast will also present a small headwind as we proactively removed advertising copy for safety reasons and it took some time to replace given some of the damage in the area. We're immensely proud of the team in the region who responded to storms in such a safe and expeditious manner. So with that said, looking ahead to the fourth quarter and based on what we are seeing in the business as of today, we estimate that reported Q4 U.S. media revenue growth will be around 3% with billboard in the low single digits and transit again growing high single digits, led by the New York MTA. Before turning it over to Q&A, I wanted to speak a little bit more about the billboard contract in New York that we exited as it's illustrative of our broader strategy with regards how we approach contracts and partnerships with any counterparty, municipal or private or any property type, both billboard and transit. This particular contract exit reflects our focus on improving margins and the economic returns associated with these partnerships. When bidding on new or legacy contracts, particularly those with revenue shares and minimum annual guarantees, we strive to submit proposal that reflect the value brought to such a partnership by OUTFRONT, requiring an attractive return to the company and its shareholders. So with that operator, let's now open the lineup for any questions.

Thank you, Jeremy. [Operator Instructions] Our first question today comes from David Karnovsky with JPMorgan. Please go ahead. Your line is open.

Hey, thank you. Maybe just following up on the Q4 guide. I don't know if you can size the impact of the MTA versus the storms you called out in the Southeast. And then I think the company that had won the MTA contract or bid for the MTA contract had flagged some strategic benefit as a result of that. Is there kind of, was there any consideration on that front from your side? Just like to hear more on that.

Yes, thanks, Dave, for the question. So as to sort of scale, around about a point and a half of growth in that sort of range and as I say, then there's a small piece for the storms that we mentioned. Look, with regards to strategic benefit, every company has to make their own decision. When they bid these contracts? I wouldn't want to comment on, active competitors bidding strategy, but what I can say is that, from our point of view, as the contract, we bid it on the basis that would work for us and that's kind of all you can say in these situations.

Okay. And then just on the property lease expense down, we would have thought maybe this would have firmed up a bit with the better result national. So I'm curious if you could walk through national by market, what you're seeing in places like LA and New York relative to the other regions. And you mentioned the west flattish. I don't know if you can kind of walk through that and what you're seeing with the media vertical. Thanks.

Matt you go.

I'm sorry, this is Matt. As Jeremy mentioned in his prepared remarks, we're still seeing a little bit of weakness in LA and a little bit in New York Nationals, not back to where we'd like it, still stronger right now in transit. So our billboard lease expense not up as much as we've said in past years. It slipped around. When New York and LA over-perform or over-perform their peers, you see a little higher lease expense. We're seeing the opposite throughout most of this year.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Cameron McVeigh with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thanks. Just may be an update on the MTA integration of some of the programmatic ad tech capabilities down there, how the timing shaping up and potential impacted transit results going forward?

So thanks for the question, Cameron. You heard the call out there that 7% of the revenue generated in Q3 on the MTA came through automated channels. Basically, we've now hooked up our live boards, which are all of the screens that you see on platforms. We've also hooked up the urban panels that are the panels that you see above the subway entrances. What we haven't yet done is hook up on the mobile panels which are on train on the subway and also Metro North and Long Island Railroad. So we'll get that benefit as we go down the track, and that's going to be over the coming months. We're also in the process of hooking up our assets in Boston and D.C. and San Francisco. So, we'll get a bit of benefit also there in 2025. We've been growing transit very nicely this year. It was good for Matt to be able to talk about the MTA in terms of the whole sort of being cash positive as we go forward. So that's a great milestone for the business and we are excited, I think, by the growth opportunity that the transit business will give us as we go through 2025.

Got it. Thank you. And then just secondly, are you able to size the political ad spend and impact? Maybe how that had trended over 4Q. Thanks.

I can take that for the year. In 2024, we got about $15 million of political I can compare that to 2020 when we had about $10. So a little more effort, a little more involvement of our government affairs team I think led to increase about half of that amount is in the fourth quarter obviously primarily October.

Our next question comes from Lance Vitanza with TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Thanks for taking the question. I wonder if you could talk in a little bit more detail about the increased spend at Corporate and I'm just trying to get a sense for how much of that can we think of as being one time or non-recurring and the higher professional fees was that just for the Canada sale? That's easily dismissed if that's the case. But the management consulting project and higher comp sound a little bit more nebulous and or recurring and then particularly I'm not clear on exactly what happened with the benefit plan I think you mentioned that is unfunded but yet required some incremental expense as well. So appreciate your help there.

Sure. It's Matt again, I'll break it down. The benefit plan is an unfunded deferred comp plan, you know I think tied to the S&P 500 or another equity index. So basically when stock markets go up in a quarter it's a higher expense. When they go down it's a good guy. So there's almost always and the line item is relatively small so it sticks out so there's always going to be some volatility from that and we just try to make people aware, up or down or order of magnitude. The professional fees in Corporate is a nationally recognized management consulting firm we've been working with most of the year helping us really look at our assets and generating more revenue and more EBITDA off the assets that we have. We think the investment this year will add some benefit this year but a lot more in the future. So we're learning some new techniques in improving our already strong performance around our markets. I think those are the two big ones we called out comp in 2024. It's mostly we were a little bit off last year in our numbers where we're crewing closer. As we mentioned we're at the high end of our ASFO guide. I think we're accruing closer to 100% of our short-term compensation plans versus last year we were a little bit under our 100% targets. Hopefully that's helpful.

Very helpful. And if I could just squeeze in one more I was actually if anything seems like national came in a little bit better than I would have than I might have thought. And I'm wondering if you're seeing that continue in the fourth quarter or is that sort of. Was it a kind of a flash in the pan and maybe we see softer performance going forward.

Yes. Thanks Lance. National was certainly better in Q3 than we'd seen for the first two quarters. And as we look at it, as we look at it now, we'd expect national to be up in Q4.

Thanks very much.

Our next question today comes from Ian Zaffino with Oppenheimer. Your line is open.

Great. You guys maybe give us an idea of what conversions look like for the remainder of the year and how you're thinking about it into 2025. Thanks.

Sure, Ian. I think we will get our conversions usually target a little higher number. Probably Digital is about 100 to 150, may be on the low end of that, fewer acquisitions this year, fewer management agreements, and around the same number of conversions. So we'll be adding fewer digitals this year. I think the number in 2025, I'm not prepared to give a precise guidance range, but we're pretty confident it's going to be higher in 2025 than in 2024.

Okay, thanks. And then also, if I could speak in one more on the MTA, and I don't know if you could per se answer this, but, as far as the rates going up, I guess ridership is still kind of well below where it was pre-COVID. Are you seeing either advertisers returning or kind of what's driving that rate? Just given that a lot of the ridership is just sort of stalled. And any kind of view on what ridership might be doing going forward? I guess a lot of companies are kind of calling people back five days a week. But any thoughts there would be helpful. Thanks.

Yes, thanks, Ian. I mean, we said right the way along that we anticipated we'd be able to get our revenues back up to pre-COVID levels without the audience growing back to or ridership growing to pre-COVID levels. And that's basically because we just have a much better product. We've undertaken this sort of huge digitization program. So now you can be more timely, you can be more creative, and it's just a very exciting product. And I think that's really what's drawing advertisers back. And as we look at it, I think we really feel very positive, as, from the question that we had earlier with regards to, automated revenues that that will, you know, keep, keep driving a very pretty solid digital growth story on our transit assets and particularly on the MTA.

Okay, thank you very much.

Our next question comes from Daniel Osley with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning. Maybe just one on National. You've talked in the past about the headwind from the media and entertainment vertical. So just wondering how that vertical specifically is trended early in Q4, and do you expect the strong films later in the quarter to give you a further boost? Thank you.

Yes, thanks for the question. I think it's fair to say that this year we did expect that the median entertainment category would sort of bounce back more strongly than we saw. It certainly seems to have taken, I mean, not just for us, but I mean, for the industry as a whole, longer, I think, to get over the impacts of both strikes last year. Where we stand right now, I think we feel okay about the movie category as we look into the fourth quarter. And there are other areas of entertainment that are doing well for us. tech:

Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Patrick Scholl with Barrington Research. Your line is open.

Hi, good morning. Thank you. I just had another question about the MTA. To the extent that you do get some recovery in ridership, I guess, is there any sort of concern you have in, like the baskets of out of home spending for advertisers and that may be being reallocated from kind of the billboard side to the transit side?

Typically when you look at what we do have, a good crossover coming between people that users, on the billboard side of the business and the transit business? We also have some very specific advertisers in transit who are buying transit from different reasons. The commuting audience on Metro North, is not necessarily the same audience you get on the Cross Bronx Expressway. So, that I think has always been the case. We have sort of, very high end audiences, say in various parts of parts of the MTA system. And, I think most commentators believe that, ridership continues to creep up in cities. I think we do. But what, we're kind of doing just fine without it. Because whichever way you look at it, 4 million sets of eyeballs every single day or more than that is a huge, huge audience for advertisers. And I think people are just beginning to re-appreciate that.

Okay, and then maybe on the automated buying side, I guess you said that that's helped bring in new advertisers. What sort of impact has that had on pricing?

So when we look at the pricing that we achieve on a CPM basis through our programmatic channels, about a dollar higher than the CPMs that we achieved through our direct sales force. So in general, do you know what I mean? Programmatic is a very positive part of our business right now. Not all of the dollars that we get on programmatic are necessarily absolutely new. Some of them might have come through a different channel. So I should make that point. But also, I mean, we take getting revenues from a bunch of advertisers that frankly, we never would have expected and in some cases haven't even heard of. So, it really is extending the number of different advertisers on a weekly basis on our digital platforms.

Okay, thank you.

Thank you. We have no further questions, so I'd like to turn the call back to Jeremy now for any closing comments.

Thanks, Lydia. And thanks to everyone for joining us today. I'm sure I'll be seeing many of you at the various conferences and events this winter, but for those that I don't, looking forward to presenting our full year results to you in February. Thank you very much indeed.

This concludes our call today. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your line.