Good evening. My name is Kyle and I'll be your conference operator today. Welcome to PagSeguro Digital Earnings Conference Call for the Second Quarter of 2023. [Operator Instructions] This event is also being broadcast live via webcast and may be accessed through PagBank website at investors.pagseguro.com. Participants may view the slides in any order they wish. Today's conference is being recorded and will be available after the event is concluded. I would now like to turn the call over to your host, Eric Oliveira, Head of IR. Please go ahead.

Hello, everyone. Thanks for joining our second quarter 2023 earnings results call. After the speakers' remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. Before proceeding, let me mention that any forward-looking statements included in the presentation or mentioned on this conference call are based on currently available information and PagSeguro Digital's current assumptions, expectations, and projections about future events. While PagSeguro Digital believes that the assumptions, expectations, and projections are reasonable in view of currently available information, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those included in PagSeguro Digital's earnings presentation or discussed on this conference call, for a variety of reasons, including those described in the forward-looking statements and risk factor sections of PagSeguro Digital's most recent Annual Report on Form 20-F and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which are available on PagSeguro Digital's investor relations website at investors.pagbank.com. Finally, I would like to remind you that during this conference call, the company may discuss some non-GAAP measures, including those disclosed in the presentation. We present non-GAAP measures when we believe that the additional information is useful and meaningful to investors. The presentation of this non-GAAP financial information, which is not prepared under any comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles, is not intended to be considered separately from, or as a substitute for, our financial information prepared and presented in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB. For more details, the foregoing non-GAAP measures, and the reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable IFRS measures, are presented in the last page of this webcast presentation and earnings release. With that, let me turn the call over to Ricardo. Thank you.

Hello, everyone, and thanks for joining our second quarter 2023 earnings call. Tonight, I have the company of Alexandre Magnani, our CEO; Artur Schunck, our CFO; and Eric Oliveira, Head of IR. Before Alexandre and Artur share the main highlights for the quarter, I would like to share the most recent milestones in the first half of 2023. Going to Slide 3, we ended June with 29.5 million clients, which along the past years, found in our comprehensive set of payments in Financial Services Solutions. The opportunity experienced a simple, safe, seamless and digital way to manage their financial lives. By using our POS devices, our online and cross-border payment platforms or proprietary set of softwares in our digital bank, we were able to surpass more than BRL2 trillion in volumes processes. Interesting to point out that it took 16 years for the company to surpass the first BRL1 trillion in volumes and all in one year to surpass the [second] trillion. At the same time, we have maintained our consistent and disciplined throughout several scenarios such as pandemic, interest rate cycles and changes in the competitive and regulatory landscape. Still, our strategy to combine growth with profitability since day one, led to our solid financial position of BRL7.6 billion in accumulated net income and more than BRL10 billion in net cash balance. We kicked off August with S&P Global attributing the highest rating in the local scale brAAA to BancoSeguro, our subsidiary responsible for the issuance of PagBank certificate of deposits, one of our competitive strengths in our funding strategy. I would like to take advances to reinforce our commitment to our mission to make easier the financial lives of Brazilians by offering a one-stop shop solution through one app, one Internet banking and one customer care center. Now I pass the word over to Alex for the commentaries on the second quarter 2023 highlights. Thank you.

Thank you, Ricardo. Hello, everyone. I would like to present how the growth, profits and cash generation drivers behaved during the second quarter of 2023. Our earnings per share market BRL1.18, 7% higher year-over-year. Our strategy to grow in selected verticals resulted in higher margins with adjusted EBITDA reaching BRL849 million, 90 basis points higher than the second quarter of 2022, resulting in net income of BRL415 million in non-GAAP basis. Our cash earnings grew 24% year-over-year and our capital expenditures was 8% lower than the second quarter of 2022. Our one-stop shop solution has been consistently attracting more and more clients' engagement. Total payment volume from our Payments division reached BRL92.7 billion and PagBank cash-in of BRL50 billion driving up deposits on platform. In Financial Services division, the highlight was the sustain at breakeven point despite the expected impact related to the regulatory change on prepaid and debit cards in Brazil. Adjusted EBITDA improved BRL66 million versus the second quarter of 2022. In Payments division, our strategy for the last 12 months was to focus on key segments that kept us on track. MSMB TPV grew 10%, almost twice as much as the industry growth this quarter. Our merchant acquiring business remains solid and through the combination of our superior value proposition and the broad reach of our sales channels. We have been able to grow above the market in the MSMB segment as presented in Slide 5. During the first 45 days of 3Q '23, we noticed an uptrend in TPV growth to 8.5% year-over-year from 4% on the second Q '23. In MSMB, we have improved our sales on the online channel, which we expect to contribute to the TPV growth moving forward. HUBs presented further improvements in sales productivity and increased cross-selling of financial service through…

Thanks, Alexandre. Hello, everyone, and thank you for joining us tonight. Once again, PAGS presented another set of records for a second quarter in the company's history. TPV, gross profit, net income and cash earnings market all-time high figures. Total revenue and income grew 2% quarter-over-quarter, positively impacted by TPV growth and financial income, partially offsetting the impacts in top line related to the regulatory change in interchange cap on prepaid and debit cards that came in force in April 1. Our winning funding strategy has led down for the third consecutive quarter, the financial expenses despite no change in Brazilian interest rate in the second quarter 2023. Our additional leverage coming from lower losses and operating expenses led to EBITDA growth of 8% quarter-over-quarter with significant improvement in our EBITDA from payment units which grew 18% versus first quarter, led by lower transactional costs yield and also related to the regulatory change on prepaid and debit cards, neutralizing potential effects in bottom line from lower revenues. Earnings before tax also presented a strong growth of 13% quarter-over-quarter and 7% year-over-year due to the sustained adjusted EBITDA breakeven in Financial Services division. Better-than-expected Financial Services results led to a higher tax income rate, which did not imply headwinds for profitability. Net margin on a non-GAAP basis grew 60 basis points versus second quarter 2022, resulting BRL415 million in net income. Earnings per share increased again and achieved BRL1.18 in the quarter, 5% better than Q1 '23. Going to the next slide, we would like to deep dive in our revenue performance. This quarter, we had several moving parts. In Financial Services, we lost BRL74 million versus second quarter '22 due to interchange cap on prepaid and debit cards with negligible impact in bottom line given the natural offset in transaction…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Mario Pierry with Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Hi guys, good afternoon. Congratulations on the results. Let me ask you a question focused on your headcount reduction, right. You've talked about operating expenses declining year-over-year due to some changes in headcount that you made. However, we're hearing some of your competitors talking about expanding headcount going forward especially salesforce. So can you give us an idea of where your headcount reductions -- which areas they impacted and how do you think about headcount going forward? Thank you.

Hi, Mario, it's Artur speaking. Thank you for your question. Related to headcount reduction that we did, there is only one department that we didn't change anything that is related to commercial team. As you know, we have a little bit more than 300 HUBs, 3,000 people in the streets and there is no intention to increase any people in the sales force at this point. What we did is relocate some HUBs from one side to another side when we identify that there are many opportunities in other places that we don't have the HUBs at this point. And the reduction so was related to other departments, including IT, because other departments. And looking ahead, we do not understand that there is need to hire more people needed for commercial team. So the true HUB downside that we did this year is enough to our intention to going -- continue to growing the company for the future.

Okay, that's clear. And then if I may ask a second question related to volume growth, TPV growth of 4% year-on-year. We do see that the industry is decelerating, but can you give us a little bit more color on why we're seeing the slowdown in growth overall with it? Because card penetration in Brazil is already reaching like a mature level. Is it because we are seeing disruption from PIX? And how should we think about volume growth going forward?

Hi, Mario. Thank you. This is Ricardo. We saw that Q2 was -- we saw some decrease in card volumes in the overall economy. I think it's more related to macroeconomic variables than to the penetration of cards and things like that. Of course, if you look at peaks and if you look at the OpEx report, you'll see that debit is not growing year-over-year. If you saw debit and prepaid, you're going to see there is going to be some increase there, but probably PIX is cannibalizing the growth of debit. We don't see a cannibalization of credit. But if you look at our numbers and we had some number in the slide here, in the first 45 days in Q3, we grew 8.5% TPV. So we are seeing some acceleration in our TPV in the first half of the quarter was 8.5% and it seems that the worst was in Q2 2023 for the industry as a whole. So again going back to your question, it seems to be more related to macroeconomic scenarios, people without credit card limits and things like that then to saturation or other variables.

And going forward, how should we worked -- they think that they could see double-digit growth going forward in volumes?

Well, we're seeing 8.5% in the first 45 days. I think in Q3 its going to be close to that. Let's see what we're going to have in Q4. As far as you know from the industry, people are more optimistic about the second half. So probably in Q4, you're going to see acceleration again. I mean it's maybe too early to say, but the signs that are having in Q3 are encouraging with 8.5% growth year-over-year in the first 45 days of Q3.

Okay, guys, thank you very much.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Pedro Leduc with Itau BBA. Please go ahead.

Thank you, guys, so much. Good evening. Questions on the expenses or losses front. You expected credit losses with some of the release were close to zero. Understand you shrunk your loan book, but I don't know if it has anything to do with lower expected losses, lower origination, just to bring it, looking to review what the underlying driver for this nil credit losses? And then also on the same line chargebacks, again rose this quarter as it thought maybe 1Q levels were -- have more sustained. So just two questions on this side. Thank you.

It's Artur speaking. Thank you, Pedro, for your question. Regarding to provisions for credit losses, as you may know, last year we decided to shift our originations and the portfolio to secure products. Also in last year, we increased a lot of provisions to cover the NPLs performance that we identify with the legacy and all the legacy is 100% provisioning. So the new underwriting is related to secured products that requires less provisions than unsecured products. So this is the reason that we have this -- this almost net no impact in the provisions because it's not necessarily to increase provisions for credit. Regarding to -- regarding to chargebacks, Pedro, it's -- you're right that we see a small increase from Q2 compared to Q1, but something, let's say, it's not a one-time event, but it's something that is not going to be in this level for the future. It's going to be around 10 bps, 11 bps that what you expect for the future. So there's going to be some more increase here and there, but overall is going to be between 10 bps and 11 bps for the whole year. So that's what we expect. And there might be some quarters that you have to be more, to be less because you know chargebacks -- you can receive chargebacks up to six months after the transaction. Sometimes you have this time mismatch between the transaction -- the date of the transaction, the date of the chargeback, but still something that is crucial here and it's not a problem that we have in regarding chargebacks, just small variation to be honest.

Thank you, Artur.

Our next question comes from Jorge Kuri with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Hi, good evening, everyone. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to ask about the take rate contraction during the quarter. If you can walk us through what exactly drove the contraction? And how is third quarter moving along relative to that second quarter print that we saw today? And then the second part of my question is, what are you seeing in terms of price changes for prepayment rates, now that the Central Bank started easing cycle. You were a bit guarded in the first quarter conference call saying that you would benefit from falling rates, but that the elasticity would probably be tested by aggressive price competition and so peers to see if you are seeing anything positive or negative so far? Thank you.

Hi, Jorge, thank you for the question. Good to hear you. I will start with the second question and then Artur can answer the first one. Regarding prepayments, we didn't see any pressure in terms of prepayment rates at this point. Of course, we have a small -- very small part of our TPV where prepayments are related to the basic interest rate of the economy, it's related to CDI. So once CDI goes down for these clients, rates goes down automatically, but there is very, very small part of our TPV. For the other part, we didn't change our price. We don't see movements from the competition decreasing in price at this point. And remember that we had this decrease from 13.75% to 13.25%. So although it's -- 50 bps is not something that we think is, let's say, the structure for people to start changing the price at this point. So we don't see, if the rates keeps falling down, some competitors will start decreasing prices. As we said before, we don't plan to be the first one to keep decreasing prices. We try to keep the prices alive that we have as long as we can. But, of course, we're going to evaluate and look what the competitors are doing. But at this point, we didn't see pressure. Looking to the end of the year, the basic interest rates expect to come to around 11.75% or 12% and for next year around 9%, 9.5%. So we'll keep following the movements of competitors. But going back to your question at this point, we don't see pressures for prepayment rates decrease yet. So let's see. And Artur, would you like to take the first one?

Yes, Jorge, good to talk to you. Thank you for the question. And related to this take rates, there are many moving parts and we decided to include a slide, Slide 9, in the presentation that shows everyone what -- that the most clear way to show to everyone that there are moving parts and those moving parts related to Financial Services division and also payments. In financial divisions, as you know, may prefer to start the interchange cap on prepaid cards and debit cards that affected our revenues impact in Financial Services division. On top of that, we decided to change the underwriting. And also the portfolio from unsecured products to secured products that present lower yields, but longer durations, better for engagement to the clients when we move our originations to payroll loans, that also reduce the level of revenue that we have in financial services, but with lower expected credit losses. In terms of payments, we have a positive effect of our TPV growing 4% year-over-year that resulted in BRL141 million of revenues. However, we saw that in the second quarter, we have shorter duration on TPV credit card installments reducing the number of installments that affected our take rates, because as we have less installments, we have less take rates. And also we continue to changing the client mix in payments to SMB clients that has lower take rates, but good contribution in terms of gross profit and EBITDA. On top of that, we have this BRL22 million in other financial income that also contributed a little bit because of interest -- interest rate in accounting that was -- was higher than -- than before.

Thank you. That was very clear. Thank you, all. And just the last part of my question was, how is that take rates trending so far in the third quarter relative to the second quarter?

We are expecting our take rate reducing a little bit, not too much, but reducing because of this client shift mix.

Got it. Perfect. Thank you, Artur and thank you, Ricardo.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from John Coffey with Barclays. Please go ahead.

Great, thank you -- thank you very much for taking my call. I just had two short questions, which were somewhat overlap with the last caller. My first question was on Page 9, which I thought was a great slide and I find it to be very clear. As far as that 74%, which is a result of the prepaid interchange caps, I understand that and I see that that will -- I would presume continue at some level for the next three quarters before it lapse. But regarding the [171] which you're getting from the shorter duration on TPV for credit card installments. Could you give me some thoughts about when that lapse? Is that something that we should also expect for three quarters or have we seen this already in the past couple quarters and we should see that impact diminish? And my second question is if we do see 50 basis -- 350 basis points to clients in the SELIC over the course of 2023, how should we think about the different puts and takes on your P&L? Because you already seem able to mitigate the effects of SELIC increases just due to your strong balance sheet, how can you take advantage of this if you start to see these interest rate declines? Thank you.

Hi, John. Thank you for the question. I'll start backwards here if -- just to give a sensitivity analysis here. For every 100 bps decrease in SELIC, if we did not change the price and the -- keep the same capital structure and client mix, I mean, all variables equal, we're going to have something like close to BRL1,200 million EBT benefit for every 100 bps for one year, if everything else keeps the same. So, of course, we cannot predict how is going to be the other variables because we cannot control. And let's say if the client mix changed a little bit or if competitors start decreasing price and you may respond a little bit, we don't know how it's going to be the size of our response and things like that. But everything else equal, it's going to be BRL200 million, around BRL200 million EBT for every 100 bps. So that's the sensitivity to give a sense how is the P&L related to the SELIC. Regarding the order 171, that's something that may happen in some quarter, maybe the next quarter is going to be better. What we saw here is that the duration went down a little bit, but let's say in Q4, when you have some people using more debit, but we also have some people buy like holiday gift and things like that, the duration could go up. So it's hard for you -- for us to predict to say to you that 171 will keep going down in Q3 and in Q4. We are just putting here what happened in this quarter. It doesn't mean it's going to happen in following quarters. And also important to say that for the whole analysis for the P&L, so to say, we should look at the financial expenses and also the financial income because what the end of the day what matters is the net of these two lines, financial income minus financial expenses and here we are just talking about the financial income in this Slide 9, just we're explaining only the revenue part of the P&L. So, I don't know if it's clear for you or if you need any clarification.

No, that was very helpful. I appreciate it. Thank you.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Gabriel Gusan with Citi. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys, good evening. So a couple of questions. So maybe just a different way to ask this point about competition. So do you see any signs that competition or any other financial aspects to be more broader here, could make PAGS not enjoy the full benefit or the bulk of the benefit of the lower SELIC in its bottom line? And second question is CapEx increased quarter-over-quarter. So kind of expecting that first quarter level to be more of a trend. And so what's the background there? Why we are not seeing a lower level here given the lower additions of clients? Thank you.

Hi, Gabriel. I will start with the first one and then Artur can talk about the capital expenditures. To be honest, we are not seeing big changes in competition in the -- in the segments that we decide to play, which are -- which is essentially MSMB. We know there is some competition happening in the key accounts, but we are not part of that game. So we are more focusing -- most of our focus in MSMBs. And the competition -- the competitive environment we've seen in the past quarter is similar to what it will be seen in the last years, in the past year. So we don't see big changes. I know some players say they are going to increase salesforce and things like that, but to be honest, we don't see that hurting us in such a way that we need to change our strategy or to change the way they work here, so competition seems to be similar to levels that we had before. And answer to your question about how we can benefit about the SELIC went down, as I was saying before, we don't plan to be the first one who -- to pull the trigger and decrease prices. So we -- we try to offer better services for our clients in such a way they can use us and they are not that price sensitive. That's much more -- we can see that much more in the longtail and micro clients and we try to do that with the same for the SMBs by offering PagBank to them. So I mean it's hard to predict to you. If SELIC goes down, if some competitors start to decrease prepayment rates if you do the same, but we don't plan to be the first one. We will keep following the competitors. I guess, after these two years of pandemic and the SELIC with 13.75%, companies are not looking for growth at any price as they used to do in 2021. So every -- everyone is more rational looking for profitability. So, I mean, I don't think it's going to be irrational movements if we keep seeing SELIC going down, but we are going to be close to our clients to understand what's going on. Yes, that's pretty much the way that we think here.

Gabriel, thank you for your question. Nice to talk to you again. Regarding to CapEx, it's true. It was higher than Q1 '23, but it was lower than Q2 '22. But the good point is the CapEx that we are having right now is under control, in line with our budget, our annual budget. And the reasons that the CapEx was higher in this -- in this quarter was because we need to increase inventory levels because of higher POS sales. Looking ahead, what we are expecting is to have a similar or likely lower than 2022 CapEx.

Perfect. Thanks a lot.

Thank you, Gabriel.

Thank you, Gabriel.

Our next question comes from Neha Agarwala with HSBC. Please go ahead.

Hi, thank you for taking my question. Can we just talk about the dynamics of the SMB segment? You posted stronger growth around 10% for the SMB segment versus the entire TPV, but should we expect a strong -- stronger acceleration for the SMB segment? Is that your focus? And how the dynamics that you're seeing in that particular segment? And then can we talk a bit about the long tail segment? Your active merchants continue to decline as that probably are being more selective and focusing on profitability, but when can we see that stabilize? And do you see an impact from -- there are some new players who got their full acquiring license, have you seen any change in competition or with tone going down market, do you see more aggressive price subsidies for the POS or any other change in dynamics which is worth highlighting? Thank you so much.

Hi, Neha, I'm going to answer your question in two parts. First about SMBs and then we can talk a little bit about longtail. Well, what we're seeing in SMB is similar to what we've been seeing the past quarters. We understand that we -- we have a very powerful combination here, we have a very clear value proposition for the SMBs. To be honest, I didn't see any other competing in the market with the same combination of payments and digital bank that we have here. And also we have this instant settlement that other players don't offer for the SMB. So if you're an SMB and you use PagBank, you can have the plus zero right after a transaction, receive your money. You don't have PagBank with high-yield CDs. So for the SMBs, they understand the value proposition, we have this advantage, of course. Some of them don't understand or they prefer to work with the banks they already work. But at the end of the day, we think we have a strong value proposition with a very powerful combination. That's why we tried to leverage and to use our sales force to sell for the SMBs and we are doing -- we're doing very well, to be honest. As you could see, we are growing 10% TPV twice as much as the industry has been growing SMB. So that's first part. The second one about longtail. We know we have seen some net add losses in longtail, part of that is churn that happened one year ago, so we're not seeing this TPV for the past 11 months because they stopped working with us one year ago and then we are seeing churn right now. We try to always balance the subsidies that you have, the acquisition…

No, that's very helpful, Ricardo. Thank you so much.

Our next question from Kaio Prato with UBS. Please go ahead.

Hi, everyone. Good evening. Thanks for the opportunity. I have just one question here related to your mix shift strategy on payments. I understand when you mentioned that you are moving towards larger merchants and it is positive in terms of EBITDA growth. But what we are seeing is that actually your TPV is growing slightly below industry, I think, on a year-over-year basis. And more importantly, total revenues excluding transaction costs are declining year-over-year. So your EBITDA indeed increased, but seems to be much more related to expenses control rather than revenues. So having said that, just would like to understand your view about this dynamic, if we are missing anything here? And what is the strategy going forward in order to reaccelerate the revenue tax transaction costs split? Thank you.

Hi, Kyle. This is Alexandre. Thank you for your question. I think there is -- we are going through an optimization cycle since second semester last year where we started important repricing movement going up our price. And also we implemented very strict risk management policies in order to control and reduce our chargeback losses. Going over this cycle from last -- at the end of last year into the beginning of this year, these slowed down our growth in the acquiring business in general, affecting longtail and affecting large accounts especially. Obviously moving forward as we have all these risk management program in place and better balance as we have went through the repricing cycle and now we see opportunities to further growth in the future as we have been experienced these in the beginning of the third quarter. So moving forward, we see an acceleration. We didn't lose focus on keep growing longtail segment even though we grow SMB faster right now. And we see opportunity to keep growing faster till the end of the year, our TPV and consequently our revenues.

Okay, thank you very much.

Thank you, Kyle.

Our next question comes from Josh Siegler with Cantor Fitzgerald. Please go ahead.

Yes. Hi, guys, thanks for taking my question today. First of all, I'd like to talk a little bit about the potential long-term expansion on the payroll loan side of things. How are you thinking about the total growth opportunity?

Hi, Josh. I mean the market is very big. Our market share is very, very small. If you look what's going on in our credit portfolio, we are growing like -- in terms of mix shift, we're shifting like 8 percentage points from unsecured to secured credit portfolio every quarter. So -- and, of course, part of that is because we are growing in this payroll, but it's a huge market. And our -- to be honest, our market share is very, very, very small. So we see lots of room to grow. We found a way to bring these clients to us also through our app, through digital. And yes, that's definitely is going to be a credit portfolio or credit product they are going to increase in the future, but it's huge. The size -- the total addressable market is huge.

Understood. Looking forward to tracking that progress over time. And then secondly, how are you thinking about capital allocation as we progress through the back half of 2023? Do you expect to continue buying back shares at the rate that you've been buying it back or perhaps accelerated move forward?

Hi, Josh, it's Artur speaking. Related to capital allocation, we have three things that we're doing because we are generating a positive cash flow. The first one is reinvesting in the company. So we are not planning at this point to have any dividends or other type of firms to back to the shareholders this money in that way. The other point is changing to funding lines cheaper, so we can use part of this money to move from here and there and reduce the financial expenses that we have. In terms of buyback, yes, we are doing every quarter some buybacks. Now we have 7.5 million shares in the treasury. The plan is to continue doing that because of the low price that we're seeing in comparison to what we expect to have in the company. So we believe a lot that this company is a great company, especially for the future because it's a solid company, solid balance sheet and we are growing this company for the future, not just for one quarter.

Understood. Thanks very much for taking my questions.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Tito Labarta with Goldman Sachs. Please.

Hi, good evening. Thank you for the call and taking my question. A couple of questions also. Maybe just thinking little bit high level in 2024, maybe how you thinking about revenue growth. You mentioned your TPV growth maybe hit bottom and then can begin to accelerate. So, maybe take rates are coming down a little bit as you are shifting the mix. Just maybe PagBank starts to contribute more as also as you get past some of the impact from the prepaid interchange. Just high-level thoughts on revenue growth for 2024 would be helpful. And then my second question, just following up on the take rate impact from the shorter duration of the receivables, are you seeing any pressure from the banks there? Lot of talks about ending revolving cards and banks maybe pushing for doing less interest free instalments. Any colors on how you think that revolve? Are you seeing any pressure from the banks already offering less instalment period than in the past? Thank you.

Hi, Tito, this is Ricardo. I'm going to start backwards again and then someone can answer the first part. Regarding this discussion about the revolving credit card interest rates in Brazil, which is around 15% per month and compiled is going to be like 140% per year, there are many discussions at this point with Congress and politicians and so on. As a matter of fact, the text for -- for the law that is under discussion about this credit card was published today afternoon. There is no relationship or no mention in this law about installments or things like that. So we're not seeing any pressure at this point. Remember, we are a credit card issuer as well and then we are following the discussion. We are part of the discussion with the government and regulators. But at this point and the text of the law is focused on decreasing the revolving credit cards, which again in Brazil is close to 440% per year. But no updates at this point. I mean, everything is just being under discussion how it is possible to decrease this 440% to a lower level.

Hi, Tito, this is Eric. I'll breakdown the question related to revenues growth in two parts. Starting with the acquiring businesses, we do see an acceleration of TPV growth towards the second half '23 like we shared our guidance for the first 45 days of Q3. And we do expect to keep gaining market share over the next quarters and years. But we understand that as larger market share we have, the biggest -- the bigger markets are the markets where we have SMBs in large accounts, so lower take rates. But the combination with the financial expenses, potential decrease backed by lower interest rates and our funding strategy, the incremental gross profit tends to be very compelling in '24 onwards. For the financial services, we will have this interchange cap effect during until Q1 '24, so this will create potentially easy comps for second quarter '24 onwards. We also have the compounding effect on the payroll loans as we disburse upfront the cost to underwrite, but we have the compounding effect -- effects over the years. And as we keep growing our deposit base, naturally we also have additional float revenues and we also expect to grow our credit portfolio in the short-term and secured products. In mid-term, I think we are working here to further improve our onboarding end-to-end processing credit underwriting, onboarding risk assessment, underwriting and collection to restore and accelerate the underwriting of unsecured products. So this would be the main revenue streams for the both verticals.

Great, that's very helpful, Eric. And Ricardo, thank you for the color there.

Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, that concludes our question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the floor over to Mr. Ricardo Dutra for closing remarks. Please, sir, go ahead.

Thank you everyone for taking the time to participate in our call. See you next quarter. Thank you very much. Good evening.

The conference has now concluded. Thanks, everyone, for participating. You may now disconnect.