Good day, everyone, welcome to PAR Technology Fiscal Year 2024 Third Quarter Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded.. Now I will pass the call over to the Senior Vice President of Investor Relations and Business Development, Christopher Byrnes. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Carmen, and good morning everyone and thank you for joining us today for PAR Technologies 2024 third quarter financial results call. Earlier this morning, we released our financial results. The earnings release is available on the Investor Relations page of our website at partech.com, where you can also find the Q3 financials presentation, as well as in our related Form 8-K furnished to the SEC. During our call today, we will reference non-GAAP financial measures, which we believe to be useful to investors and exclude the impact of certain items. A description and timing of these items along with a reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP measures can be found in our earnings release. I'd also like to remind participants that this conference call may include forward-looking statements that reflect management's expectations based on currently available data. However, actual results are subject to future events and uncertainties. The information on this conference call related to projections or other forward-looking statements may be relied upon and subject to the safe harbor statement included in our earnings release this morning, and in our annual and quarterly filings with the SEC. Finally, I'd like to remind everyone that this call is being recorded, and it will be made available for replay via a link available on the Investor Relations section of our website. Joining me on the call today is PAR's CEO and President, Savneet Singh; and Bryan Menar, PAR's Chief Financial Officer. I'd now like to turn the call over to Savneet for the formal remarks portion of the call, which will be followed by general Q&A. Savneet?

Thank you, Chris, and thank you all for joining us today. Our Q3 results made available this morning represent the seventh consecutive quarter, in which PAR has delivered greater than 20% organic growth with limited operating expense. This continued sequential growth upscaled and demonstrated operating leverage efficiency has enabled PAR to a positive adjusted EBITDA for the quarter, a first since the company began disposing this metric earlier in management tenure. Our performance this quarter reflects the continued validation of our products as best-in-class standalone and even better together. This strategic focus on delivering a unified solution is improving user experience, furthering customer stickiness and expanding sales opportunities beyond that of a single product. The flywheel we've talked about is working and has generated the financial return we reported today. Digging into our results. Subscription services continues to be the growth engine of our company. Q3 exit ARR totaled more than $248 million and subscription services revenue for the period grew 91% when compared to Q3 last year. This revenue expansion was driven by 25% organic ARR growth compared to Q3 last year and contributions from our EBITDA accretive 2024 M&A activity including the company's acquisition of TASK Group which closed in July. Critically, our M&A activity is expected to continue to accelerate our overall growth trajectory into the future by unlocking new verticals and multi-product attachment. Operator Cloud ARR grew 41% to $93.4 million in Q3 when compared to the same period last year. This growth was driven by multi-product attachment of Data Central and PAR Payments and continued ARPU improvement, which increased 11% from the same period last year. Observed ARPU improvement was driven by price increases and PAR Payment service attachment. Our opportunity for new Tier 1 deals continues to be strong, and we believe ourselves to…

Thank you, Savneet, and good morning, everyone. Q3 was a successful quarter for PAR. Subscription services continue to fuel top line growth while we stayed fiscally responsible, managing our operating expenses. As a result, adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was a positive $2.4 million, indicative of an inflection point, driving growth with profitability. Before moving forward, and as stated in our Q2 earnings call, all 2024 and comparative 2023 results that we will discuss this morning, exclude any contributions from PAR government. As those results, including the gain on the respective sale of PAR government, have been isolated within our discontinued operations results. Total revenue were -- total revenues were $96.8 million for the 3 months ended September 30, 2024, an increase of 41% compared to the same period in 2023, driven by Subscription Service revenue growth of 91%, partially offset by a decrease in hardware revenue of 12%. Net loss from continuing operations for the third quarter of 2024 was $20.7 million, or $0.58 loss per share, compared to a net loss from continuing operations of $19.2 million, or $0.70 loss per share reported in the same period in 2023. Non-GAAP net loss for the third quarter of 2024 was $3.1 million, or $0.09 loss per share, a significant improvement compared to a non-GAAP net loss of $9.7 million, or $0.35 loss per share for the same period in 2023. Adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter of 2024 was $2.4 million compared to an adjusted EBITDA loss of $6.6 million for the same period in 2023. Now for more details on revenue. Subscription Service revenue was reported at $59.9 million, an increase of $28.5 million, or 91% from the $31.4 million reported in the prior year, and now represents 62% of total PAR revenue, excluding PAR Retail and TASK,…

Thanks, Bryan. We continue to see PAR as uniquely positioned in the food service technology sector with best-in-class software across key operational and engagement pillars. Our ability to guarantee better together experiences across our products while separately enabling a robust integration infrastructure keeps us ahead of single product competitors that only control one part of the better together equation and are dependent on third-party integrations. Put into other words, our products are winning on a standalone basis, but we continue to see a growing desire in the market for vendor consolidation. We believe the environment is ripe for continued M&A activity and PAR has shown itself uniquely capable of consolidating in the enterprise space while driving higher growth and profitability. We are delivering an impressive better together platform and are smartly investing to continue that track record, balancing our need for both growth and profitability. We look forward to sharing more about our longer term vision and strategy at our Investor Day on November 25th. Thank you to all PAR employees for your dedication and effort over the past quarter. Across the organization, our people have stepped up to ensure we deliver the outcomes our customers demand, while embracing the hard work necessary to build a company capable of delivering long-term shareholder value. And as I said earlier, we're still at day one. Chris?

Carmen, that concludes our formal remarks this morning. Can we now open the call to Q&A?

Thank you, Chris. [Operator Instructions] One moment for our first question. And it's from the line of Mayank Tandon with Needham. Please proceed.

Thank you. Good morning. Congrats on the quarter. Savneet, I wanted to just focus on the large deal activity. I think when we came into 2024, you'd called out record RFP activity and I believe there were seven large deals. I think you logged one or two, if I'm keeping count correctly. I just wanted to get sort of a status update on the other ones. Do you think you could still land a few more? What's the status on that? And if you were able to do it, could that potentially help accelerate your organic ARR growth? I know you've said mid-20s. Is that something that's conceivable if you were to win some of these larger opportunities in the pipeline?

I think we have a good shot of closing more before the end of the year. As far as accelerating our growth, it's hard to say. It depends on the rollout of these deals. It certainly won't hurt it. So I think our plan is built without even needing these mega-deals, but if they come they certainly would accelerate us. But it's hard to sequence the timing of a signing and a rollout.

Understood. Maybe I'll switch over to the M&A. It's good to hear that the progress on the acquisitions of Stuzo and TASK has been good. Could you give us a little bit more color in terms of what's surprised you positively and even negatively? And maybe it would be helpful to get any data points on your ability to cross-sale into these accounts and win new logos [ph]. I know it's early, but any additional color beyond what you said in your prepared remarks would be helpful.

Sure. On the PAR Retail side, [indiscernible] Stuzo, it's been -- that’s a fantastic experience we've seen. Really great receptivity by the end market for PARS involvement. I think at the same time, we've been able to add some go-to-market heft to the area. And most importantly, I think we're really excited about the product delivery we can push into that market. And so it's been fantastic. I think, culturally, it's been a tremendous hit. And I'm -- just crazy excited as we mentioned, we signed our next large customer in the quarter. And we think there's a lot more to come. And importantly, when we made this acquisition, it was a bit contrarian. The idea of C-Stores becoming food service businesses was still really not a thing. And if you look today, it's not become a narrative, it's become consensus, and that convenience stores are growing their food service businesses double digits across the industry. And for them to continue to compete with restaurants, they need tooling like we provide. And so I think we'll have the same playbook in this vertical as we did in restaurants. And obviously, it's great because we can leverage what we've done in restaurants in that market. So I think we feel really good, really excited. And it's a nice long-term place for us to be. On the TASK Group side, we are so early. We're a few months into it, but I think what we're looking at very quickly is the platform is special. It's one of those products when you demo, jaws [ph] aren't dropping, but the enterprise version of that. And we've seen really strong interest, not just in restaurants, but in these adjacent verticals, call them shoulder markets, like sporting stadiums, hotels, casinos. And I'm not saying we're going to go into that, but it certainly gives us suspicion of doing more than what we do today. And then I think importantly, as we've talked about, giving us that international arm that we've never had before is wildly important as our big United States customers are almost all growing more internationally than domestically. So, we're really excited for that as well.

That's helpful. Congrats again. Thank you so much.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. That is from the line of Samad Samana with Jefferies. Please proceed.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. And maybe we'll start first with Savneet. On the rollout of Burger King and Wendy's, I know they're adopting different products, but maybe what have you observed or learned from now that you're implementing at these larger customers, what the organization and the product is capable of? Is there anything that you've seen that maybe you could do better that they're asking for as you're rolling it out, or something that's gone particularly well, and how does that maybe inform you as you think about targeting additional large customers?

That's a great question, Samad. So, on the Wendy side, that's an enterprise rollout of Punchh. And I think our major learning is doing these at scale and getting it out. As we mentioned, it was our fastest large rollout ever and honestly, I think it just gave us confidence that why can't we do that again? And so from a business perspective, I think what it's shown is that we can operate in these large enterprises. And so it's making us a lot more creative about how we structure our deals with these large Tier 1 brands and not giving them the cookie cutter process we've had for the last decade or so. So I think it's kind of -- it's not changed. I think, how we operate, but certainly given us confidence in thinking about how we structure future enterprise deals. On the POS side with Burger King, we're still relatively early. I think the major exciting takeaway is, I think our experience has fully convinced us and I think we'll have this in our numbers over time, that "just doing POS is not the end game". And so I think what we're going to see more and more in these large rollouts is saying, hey, I know I said I wanted to upgrade my POS, but why don't we do POS in back office and XYZ after that all at once? And so it's created some really healthy conversations with us, with them, but also I think future brands are saying, let's not sequence it, let's do it together. And that's sort of the comments I had in the script about the combination of Brink and Data Central as one is kind of my major takeaway there. There's obviously tons of learnings around the logistics and coordination of such a huge rollout, but those are all things I think you'd expect us to learn.

Great. And I don't want to front run the Analyst Day too much since it's only in a couple of weeks, and I suspect you'll go through some of these strategic views there, but you've obviously demonstrated the ability to get the EBITDA positive for the core business, but you're also talking about a very robust pipeline, good demand, M&A. Is there any thought on maybe hitting the gas on hiring or investments that you've shown the market that you can be profitable? I'm just curious how you think about [indiscernible].

Yes, I think we're going to have to continue to invest because the opportunity is there. We wouldn't invest if we didn't think the opportunity was there. As an example, as I mentioned, we brought down R&D expense again. That obviously can't continue forever. And so, we'll certainly need to continue to invest as we deliver on this revenue growth. As I observed, there's very few software companies of our size that are still growing in the mid-20s and we really do feel we're at day one of this very, very large opportunity. And so you'll see us continuing to invest and candidly when that opportunity is not there, you'll see us stop and you'll see the cashless spigot accelerate tremendously. So we are trying to balance the trade-off and we think this quarter was really important to show you that we could still grow in the 20s while delivering nice EBITDA. And our mandate for our team, we're in the middle of budgeting right now, is we need both. This isn't a trade-off. We need growth and we need profitability. And so we push ourselves to get there, but we certainly will need to continue to invest because as we've suggested and you said, there's a lot of pipeline and we don't want to be pennywise, pound foolish just to deliver an optical number. We want to build something that's there for the very long run.

Great. Congrats on all the success, guys.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Will Nance with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed.

Hey, guys. Appreciate you taking the questions. Nice results today. Savneet, I wanted to follow-up on some of the earlier commentary you had on Data Central. I thought it sounded fairly upbeat, and I think you mentioned in your response to one of the prior questions, being more aggressive about trying to attach it to POS deals and sell more of a unified experience. And so, just kind of wondering, how are you guys -- how has the go-to-market changed? What's led to the success that you've seen in driving more attractive Data Central to these deals? And you mentioned doubling down on the strategy, I think in those prepared remarks, what do you kind of have in mind from that perspective over the next year or so? Thanks.

Yes, and you definitely read that through well. So we are really excited about what we're seeing at Data Central. To your question of what's driving it, it's two things. One is product. Being able to access Data Central reporting within the Brink platform is a really big unlock. Cutting two reporting systems to one gives our customers a huge advantage. It provides them a lot of confidence in the data, not having to go from one system to validate the next system. I think that connectivity of the platform is really powerful. And then the second part of it is, that allowed us to then consolidate into one sales and marketing team. And by going to market as two as one -- excuse me, versus two, we were able to prove that out. The other part of it, I'd say now we have demonstrable customer success showing the beauty of having both products at once. And so the reason why I think we're excited is that we've proven it to ourselves, we've proven it to our customers, and in our pipeline, it's quite remarkable how many deals we've been able to go into and say, hey, I know you're focused on point of sale. We'll absolutely deliver the best-in-class solution, but if you add Data Central, it will be better together. And here's our track record of proving that. And we've been really encouraged how many customers, and potential customers, excuse me, have resonated with that and said, okay, I think that makes sense.

That's great to hear. I appreciate that. And then just maybe more of like kind of a modeling, I think they should send in questions. So the 25% organic ARR growth, super impressive this quarter. As we think about looking out over the next couple of quarters, folding in some of the recent acquisitions into the base, I know those were growing a little slower. Is low 20s still sort of the right range to be thinking about absent, a acceleration and sort of large deal activity that you referenced in an earlier question? Thanks.

Yes, I think, we've sort of said for the last few years, our goal is to grow greater than 20% and when we buy a business, we want -- we sort of create a plan to get there. And I think what's exciting is that in every deal we have done, we have been able to accelerate the business first starting with pipeline and then deals. And so we're just beginning that playbook. I already see it happening on the PAR Retail side, and soon we'll see it on the TASK side. So that's our hope, and like I said, the market's still really strong. We're not seeing these deals push out, so we're very hopeful.

Awesome. Sounds great. I appreciate you taking the questions, Savneet.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Stephen Sheldon with William Blair. Please proceed.

Hey, thanks. Really nice work here. First, can you just talk some about the pipeline with convenience stores? Really nice to hear about another Tier 1 win there. And could it make sense to put even more sales resources towards that opportunity given the growth runway and some of the secular tailwinds you've been seeing?

We have. Short answer is we have. It's actually, I think, in our go-to-market team, the only place that has it for next year. We're planning to grow the go-to-market team there. So we completely agree in our adding. And like I said, I think it's funny, when we did this deal, people were a little bit confused. And now it's so consensus that the greatest threat to restaurants in America is convenience stores. And the greatest opportunity for convenience stores is restaurants. And so these formats are colliding and we get to be a little bit of an [indiscernible] supplier.

Got it. And then just on, now that you've reached positive adjusted EBITDA, can you talk about your expectations to reach positive free cash flow and any rough sense on when you think that could happen?

Yes, absolutely. What we've been telling people is we expect roughly a quarter lag. It may not be perfectly scientific. As you see, this quarter we were operating cash flow positive and the main delta will just be the interest expense. And so, as you know, we took out a note to fund the TASK acquisition, but we don't have lots of traditional, call it [indiscernible], and so I think there will be roughly a quarter-ish lag between the two.

Very helpful. Thank you.

Thank you. One moment for our next question. And it's from the line of Eric Martinuzzi with Lake Street Capital Markets. Please proceed.

Yes, the good ARR on the organic business says that all is well as far as the current state of affairs, but I was wondering from a macro perspective, are you seeing any change in the top of funnel pipeline, maybe [indiscernible] there and then gone or pulled back, any change up the funnel?

No, we haven't. We still feel pretty good. We haven't really seen much change at all from our last quarter as far as demand. The only change we see is relatively positive on the Data Central side, and that's really the combination of a Brink. So it's not like back office is exploding. It's that the attachment to Brink is what's gotten customers excited.

Okay. And then you talked about a growth rate in excess of 20%. But just taking that down in another layer, between engagement and the operator segments, what's the expectation there, or is there a difference between the growth rate that should be anticipating over the next 2, 3 years?

Yes, absolutely. I mean, I think historically, or not historically, the last kind of 12 months, you've seen tremendous growth in the Operator Cloud. That will continue. I think it's both a function of TAM. Operator Cloud is in a third of the sites, roughly, of Engagement Cloud, and so there's less market in front of it, and so you'll see more growth out of that side of the business. I think the other part of it is we've got more products to sell in that suite versus we [indiscernible] cellular back office payments, and hopefully more to come. But generally, I think it's just a little bit earlier in its TAM.

Got it. Thanks for taking my question.

Thank you. Our next question is from the line of George Sutton with Craig-Hallum. Please proceed.

Thank you. Savneet, you had mentioned and obviously we all know that the U.S quick service restaurant brands are growing faster internationally. I'm just curious if you can give us an update now with TASK under your belt a little bit. What kind of an opportunity are you seeing for really driving those U.S brands into the TASK system?

We're really early. We've started the connectivity, if you will. And it's funny, just the announcement of the closing of the transaction led to a couple of people inbound to us about potential partnership over there. I think what I can say 100% validated is that our customers and not just our customers, other big U.S brands are looking for a solution internationally. Now, we've got to prove that we can deliver on that going forward.

Got you. One other thing on the large brand opportunities in the U.S., obviously, with you rolling out, can you talk about your conversations with other brands as you're talking about really scaling up and scaling down that implementation capability? I'm just curious is that -- are you convinced you can take on other large opportunities like that?

We are right now, and I think that what I know for certain, we can take it down because you can take down that expense. Ramping it up, we feel like we did a really good job for Burger King and potentially could, but I think given the pipeline we have, we're likely to keep that going just because I think we're going to have, given the pipeline we have, we're likely to keep that going just because I think we're going to have more to roll out over time and hopefully this is our continued cadence.

Perfect. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Charles Nabhan with Stephens.

Good morning and congrats on the quarter. Just a quick one on subscription gross margin based on the disclosure on Slide 15. Now, if I look back over the past few quarters sequentially it's been increasing in the mid-single-digit range, I think 4 bps this quarter. I'm just curious if you expect that trajectory to continue and if you could remind us what specific products are accretive to that margin. I believe in the past you've said that Punchh is accretive, Brink is in line, payments and menu are slightly below. But if you could just remind us of that, those drivers, that'd be helpful.

Sure. So everything you said is correct. Essentially what's happening is Brink is now in line or has gotten close to getting in line, and I think over time it even has the potential to be more, but right now it's getting in line. Punchh is accretive, Data Central is very accretive. PAR Ordering and Payments are at the moment below that. And so what we're balancing is that PAR Ordering and Payments are the fastest growing part of the business. Right now, lower gross margin. So that hurts margin, but the larger products are having more efficiencies come out. And so you're seeing the balance of that. And obviously, as we fold in our acquisitions, we'll see the impact on gross margin. All of our acquisitions this year have been wildly accretive to the operating income side. As we get more disclosures out there, you'll sort of see their impact on the gross margin side. So in general, I think over time, that number will move its way up. Quarter-to-quarter, it's a little bit hard because you're sort of different growth rates for different products at different times.

Got it. And if I could follow-up with that on that topic. If I recall, when you had acquired Stuzo, you had indicated that their average ARPU was a bit higher than that of your existing product, which would indicate that there's potential for uplift from taking a competitor out of the market. It might be early, but I was wondering if you're starting to see some of that benefit from the Stuzo acquisition on Loyalty ARPU?

Yes, so it's not yet, it's too early, but I would say that the benefit is not so much taking a competitor out, but more of converting the Punchh product customers to the Stuzo platform, which is, it's called open commerce. And then I think over time, coming to market what we believe is the best solution, and then obviously upsell down the road. So you'll see this nice trend of the Punchh to store customers, hopefully coming over the open commerce platform at a higher price, and then we think we can convert them to more and more products over time.

Got it. Thanks again. Appreciate the color.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question is from Adam Wyden with ADW Capital.

Hey, guys. Congrats on a great quarter and reaching the milestone of $2.5 million of EBITDA. I think I remember in 2018 sitting in my office with Chris Burns and talking about how hardware sales go down, you're going to lose a lot of money. And it's just an entirely different business now today than it was 6 years ago. And so I think as you sort of said over the last few quarters, it's not about hardware. It's not about this stuff. It's about building 80% to 90% gross margin software and letting that sort of tell the story of profitability. So it's great to see that. I just had a couple questions. One is on Burger King. It doesn't, at least from where I'm looking at it, doesn't feel like you really started ramping up Burger King a lot. Can you sort of give us an update on sort of the Burger King rollout and then sort of making inroads in terms of the other brand? I know like on all the expert networks and stuff, the transcripts have said the relationship is really strong and they really like you. So maybe sort of expand on sort of where that rollout is and sort of how that relationship is evolving to the extent that it could be great potential for the other brands as well.

Sure. So, we're really limited what we can say. It's while we're a vendor to a business and so there's not a ton I can give you specifics around. I would say the relationship is really strong we are very close to the team both on a personal and a business level I think we feel like we understand each other well. We have a long way to go here and so I think the opportunity is great, not just with Brink, but with other products down the road. That's sort of a real excitement I have coming out of this partnership with them. But we can't say a lot without approvals and things like that. As far as the other brands, we're actively engaged with all of them. There's, I think, great respect for what we've delivered already. And I should mention that those other brands have experiences with other products, and that is incredibly helpful. And so we are, I think, looking forward to leveraging not just the experience we've had at Burger King, but with other products within those brands that help us as well. So I think we've got a good reputation within there. I think we've got now have a, hopefully their perspective is PAR Delivers. And so, I see no reason for us not to eventually do more.

And just in terms of like the rollout of Brink, I mean, I know they have a mandate internally to make the franchisees roll it out before some deadline. I mean, is it fair to assume that some of the 20, because the way I'm looking at it is your growth is like 25 without a ton of Burger King. So the way I'm looking at it is you probably would expect more Burger King in 25. Is that sort of a fair assumption?

We will definitely have a lot more in 20. I want to say definitely. My expectation is we'll have, I got a lawyer in the room, 25 greater than we have in 25 and 24.

Right, okay, yes. Now that's sort of my read through, is that you're picking up, you're sort of sustaining this 25% growth with not a ton of Burger King, which means that it's just like, it makes us more optimistic about your ability to sustain the growth rate. And then you talked about hoping to have some more announcements on other Tier 1s. Are you -- talk to me a little bit about M&A. I mean, obviously you've done TASK and Stuzo, they've done well. How do you think about being able to sort of add on more modules? I mean, you've sort of, Stuzo, you've now had, I guess, 8 months of it and it's gone really nicely. TASK is obviously a large public company, it's different, but in terms of what I would call industrial, what we would sort of call it both on M&A, sort of modules, not platforms. And if we think about TASK as sort of an international platform, I mean, could we do a couple of, I mean, obviously it's all cost of capital dependent and obviously what they want to pay relative to what you're trading at and whatnot. But I mean, do you think that you could do one or two bolt-ons next year to add product functionality? Because at least from our perspective, we're seeing a lot of businesses in the private markets that are sort of stranded, that have pretty nice products, but sort of don't have the distribution that you do. I mean, we spoke to a company just yesterday that's doing AI products, and I don't know how big it is, but it's probably in the single digits of ARR, but like they have no distribution. I mean, these are the types of companies that you would be able to plug into your platform and cross-sell. So I'm curious now with sort of, you know, private equity leverage and the IPO market sort of slow, like, you really don't have a ton of competition to buy these assets. I mean, how do you think about like sort of returning to that market to do some of these deals at some point and valuations and growth? I'm just curious, like, is that still possible or front of house?

So the M&A focus is definitely more on the modules, the tuck-ins, the bolt-ons than it is on a platform. So we are really focused on that because I think we can now prove to ourselves that when we've got one, we can push it through the distribution pipeline with limited to no cost. So that is definitely the focus. And I would completely agree with your comment on businesses being stranded.

Okay. Very good.

Adam, we got others in the queue. Okay. Last one.

I'm good. No, no, I just wanted to say, I would only just say that, look, to the extent that you guys can get your Tier 1 customers to be your advocates and allow you to announce it, I mean, look, having happy customers and letting them know that you're giving them great value. I mean, look, I know historically these customers have had a hard time letting you press release and what have you. I mean, Hooters has done a phenomenal job and Jeff Kaplan, if he's on the call, we appreciate all the missionarying he's doing for PAR. But to the extent that you can get your customers to speak on your behalf, that is the best sales engine that you can have. To the extent that you let your customers, A, be an advocate for you publicly, but also just with the press releases, I think it will help give everybody a sense that we -- our original thesis of this company is that there's no one else really penetrating Tier 1. It's playing out almost perfectly. And so, we see you guys as a one-on-one competitive asset with no competition. And so, I think to the extent that others can see that and you can let other people speak on your behalf and put out these press releases on the customers, I think that would help accelerate your cause. But no, this is great and congratulations.

Thanks, Adam. Thank you.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] One moment please for our next question. It comes from the line of Anja Soderstrom with Sidoti.

Hi, and thank you for taking my questions, and congratulations on the nice performance here. Most of my questions have been addressed already, but can you just speak a little bit about the M&A environment and if you see any changes there?

I think that it's a little bit what we just talked about, which is I think our focus on the M&A environment is on these bolt-on, tuck-ins, modules that we can push to our platform once fully integrated into one of our products. From an environment perspective, it's very robust. It seems like there's more companies for sale than there are historically. Definitely some larger transactions have happened. What we haven't seen is a lot of the smaller and medium sized transactions come through yet, and I think that's next.

Okay, thank you. That was all for me.

Thank you so much. And our last question, one moment please. It comes from the line of Mark Palmer with The Benchmark Company.

Yes, thank you for tucking me in here and a very nice job in the quarter. My question is about TASK Group and the potential of that platform. The initial thinking with regard to the acquisition of TASK was that it would enable PAR to follow its existing customers in the U.S. internationally, especially because there's more growth there. But are there any other benefits for TASK that you foresee, especially in terms of landing new customers beyond the ones that you're able to accompany in their international forays. Thank you.

Certainly. I think we are -- I hate [indiscernible] stuff, but we talked to a brand this week that we've never had a robust conversation with prior to who thinks of the TASK product as very unique, very special in international markets, and hopefully we can bring that forward to U.S. relationship over time. So absolutely, I think the TASK Group's delivered for customers that we don't have relationships to. And as I mentioned a little bit earlier, it's also delivered in markets that we're not in, things like stadiums and stuff that we'll take a look at as well.

Thank you.

Thank you. And this concludes our Q&A session for today. I will turn the call back to Christopher Byrnes for closing comments.

Thank you, Carmen, and thank you to everyone for joining us this morning. We look forward to updating you further in the coming weeks. In closing, we look forward to seeing everyone at our upcoming Investor Day on November 25 at the New York Stock Exchange. As space is limited for those intending to attend in person, please register via email at ir@partech.com. We kick off at 1 p.m. that day and we will also be webcasting our presentation with an accessible link on the Investor Page of our website. Have a great weekend everybody.

And thank you all for participating in today's conference, and you may now disconnect.