Good evening, all and thank you all for attending the Procore Technologies Full Year ‘24 Third Quarter Earnings Call. My name is Brika, and I will be your moderator for today’s call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to pass the conference over to your host, Alexandra Geller, Head of Investor Relations, to begin. Thank you. You may proceed, Alexandra.

Thanks. Good afternoon, and welcome to Procore’s 2024 third quarter earnings call. I’m Alexandra Geller, Head of Investor Relations. With me today are Tooey Courtemanche, Founder, President and CEO; and Howard Fu, CFO. Further disclosure of our results can be found in our press release issued today, which is available on the Investor Relations section of our website and our periodic reports filed with the SEC. Today’s call is being recorded, and a replay will be available following the conclusion of the call. Comments made on this call include forward-looking statements regarding, among other things, our financial outlook, go-to-market transition, products, customer demand, operations, stock repurchase program, and macroeconomic and geopolitical conditions. You should not rely on forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. All forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are based on management’s current expectations and views as of today, October 30, 2024. Procore undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect new information or unanticipated events, except as required by law. If this call is replayed or viewed after today, the information presented during the call may not contain current or accurate information. Therefore, these statements should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any subsequent date. We’ll also refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures to provide additional information to investors. A reconciliation of non-GAAP to GAAP measures is provided in our press release and our periodic reports filed with the SEC. With that, let me turn the call over to Tooey.

Thanks, Alex, and thank you, everyone, for joining us today. So I’d like to start with some highlights from the quarter. In Q3, revenue grew 19% year-over-year. Procore wins because we have the most connected platform in the industry, and our partnership with construction is simply unmatched. Let me be clear, we are the undisputed leader in construction software, which is reflected in our consistently high win rates against our main competitors, all of which have much smaller construction software revenue than Procore. As expected, non-GAAP operating margins were 9%, which is lower than Q2 due to various onetime and seasonal investments, but we are on track to expand operating margins by 900 basis points for the full year, at the high end of guidance, and we intend to continue expanding margins next year. In Q3, we began communicating as well as implementing the go-to-market changes we previously announced. The two primary focus areas of our go-to-market evolution are: moving to a general manager model that’s going to localize our go-to-market motion and better serve the regions in which we operate and introducing new technical roles to support all buyer personas and realizing the full value of the Procore platform. We believe this evolution will position us to become a multibillion revenue company while building deeper, lasting partnerships with our customers. We have received overwhelmingly positive feedback from our employees, customers and partners. Our sellers tell us that these changes are exactly what they’ve been asking for. Our international teams have long been advocating for a local go-to-market approach to drive a more connected customer experience. Our sellers in all regions are thrilled to have technical product experts to help them convey the ROI of our platform to a diverse group of buyer or personas. Our customers tell us that…

Thanks, Tooey, and thank you to everyone for joining us. The main topics I would like to cover today include our Q3 financial results, additional color on the business and our capital allocation philosophy. Total revenue in Q3 was $296 million, up 19% year-over-year, and international revenue grew 26% year-over-year. Our Q3 international results were slightly impacted by currency headwinds. On a year-over-year basis, FX contributed approximately 1 point of headwind to international revenue growth. Therefore, on a constant currency basis, international revenue grew 27% year-over-year. Q3 non-GAAP operating income was $26 million, representing a non-GAAP operating margin of 9%. Our key backlog metrics, specifically current RPO and current deferred revenue, grew 16% and 18% year-over-year, respectively. Now let me share some additional color on the business. As our guidance indicates, we expect to deliver 900 basis points of margin improvement, at the high end this year. This includes various onetime and seasonal investments in the second half of the year. These investments range across technology and marketing including our annual customer conference, Groundbreak, and will result in operating and cash flow margins in the second half of the year that are lower than the first half. Investors should not assume our second half margins represent our expectations for fiscal ‘25. Instead, please refer to our margin guidance for next year. Note that we will be expanding margins on a full year basis in fiscal ‘25. Moving to our go-to-market transition. At this stage, we are focused on communication, change management, enablement as well as onboarding new sellers. We are pleased with the positive feedback so far from employees and customers. Our hiring plans are on track and our progress further reinforces our belief that these changes will enable long-term growth for the business. Since we are early in this…

[Operator Instructions] We have the first question from DJ Hynes with Canaccord. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. Thanks for the early look at ‘25, I appreciate that. I think maybe that’s a good place to start. So I don’t know if this is for you, Tooey or Howard, but look, I know calculated billings and CRPO-based bookings aren’t a perfect indicator for you guys. But if I look at the growth rates there year-to-date, it doesn’t look like we’re setting up for 11% growth next year. So I guess the question is, what are you guys seeing in the business that these metrics might not be picking up that gives you reason to guide growth as you have for 2025?

DJ, this is Howard. Thanks for the question. Look, I’m going to reiterate that the fiscal ‘25 guide that we provided, both on the top line and the bottom line, but specifically on the top line, it’s an early guide, right. And so we are applying that incremental conservatism there. We’ve always talked about in-year guide on our revenue is something that we have high confidence that we can achieve. And there’s incremental conservatism on top of that. And remember that it’s not only an early guide, we’ve got our biggest quarter that we still have to get through in Q4, and we’ve just gotten into the early stages of this go-to-market transformation. And so the early guide, coupled with those pieces, really makes it such that we want to provide something that’s a little bit more conservative. And the other thing on that is, look, when we get into next year, we’ll have a better sense of what this transformation is going to hold.

Yes. Okay. Maybe that’s a good segue to the follow-up. I think it was in Q3 of last year that we really first started talking about customers showing up to Procore with more conservative commitments. Now that we’re starting to anniversary those deals, like how have those customers fared relative to the lower commitments that they were making at Procore?

Yes. We talked about the cohort data that we were seeing in the first two quarters of the year. And the third quarter cohort has remained largely consistent with what we saw in the first half of the year. And so when we look at folks in the cohort from Q1 and Q2 and into Q3, those that expanded continue to expand, those that remained flat started to expand a little bit more and so forth, and that has remained consistent. Keeping in mind, though, those expansion rates are still not at the levels that we had seen historically prior to this downturn.

Yes, okay. Alright, great. I’ll hop back in queue. Thank you, guys.

Thanks, David.

The next question comes from Joe Vruwink with Baird. Your line is open.

Great. Good to be on the call and thanks for taking my questions. Just on the early view on 2025, when you say the go-to-market changes you’ll see the benefits more in the back half, does that also translate to revenue growth rates that are likely higher in the back half? And relatedly, is there anything you would point to during the first half that we, on the outside, can be watching as evidence things are moving in the right direction?

At this point, I’m not going to comment about the shape of anything in terms of from a quarterly basis. But what I will say is that in fiscal ‘25, it does represent conservatism. But we’re doing this such that it’s going to eventually result in better top line growth as well as bottom line growth. The other thing I’ll just add on top of that is we recognize that fiscal ‘25 is a transition year, and the P&L and our guidance reflects that. The thing that I would note, that is, going into fiscal ‘26, the P&L is going to look better than it does in fiscal ‘25. And that’s the way that I would think about fiscal ‘25. In terms of some of the things that you’ll start to see, the progression of that really internally is going to be things like pipeline generation. It’s going to be velocity through the pipeline. It’s going to be conversion rates. And that’s ultimately going to result in higher AE productivity, better retention metrics. And then eventually, as those flow through, it will show up in our financial results. The last thing I’ll add to that is, keep in mind, we’ve always talked about this transition causing a disruption to our go-to-market, and that’s going to dovetail into fiscal ‘25. And again, that’s why we talk about fiscal ‘25 and view that as a transition year. As we then exit fiscal ‘25 going into fiscal 2016, you’ll see a better P&L.

Thank for that. And then I appreciate most of your opportunity in inbound leads are still greenfield, but when the largest company in the category announces a go-to-market change, that doesn’t go unnoticed by competition. Very clear and appreciated the comments on competitive win rates year-to-date, maybe what’s your expectation going forward and how that might play out?

Yes. So this is Tooey. Look, I’m going to start by saying that we released those competitive win rates because we actually wanted, once and for all, to just put to rest the question around how are we doing in the competitive environment. And I think that those numbers speak for themselves. And if you’ve been following us for a while, that we’ve been saying these are consistent numbers quarter-over-quarter. And so what I can tell you is that getting more customer-centric and being a better partner to your customer, and putting your salespeople up for success, will set us up, we believe, for a tremendous amount of success in ‘25 and ‘26. So we think, from a competitive environment, that we are setting ourselves up for even a better position going forward.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from Brent Thill with Jefferies. Your line is open.

Thank you. This is Luv Sodha on for Brent Thill. Thank you, Tooey and Howard for taking my question. Maybe first one for Tooey, Tooey, appreciate your traction on the large customer side. Could you just dissect what you saw in terms of the macro this quarter across the customer base? And I appreciate some of the alternative data that we track tends to be mixed. So what are you seeing out there that gives you hope that ‘26 will be better than ‘25?

Yes. By the way, Luv, great question. I think the key word in there is hope because I do talk to many, many folks in the industry all throughout the quarter. I will say that though kind of the overall sentiment is very similar to what it’s been over the last few quarters, which is, in the short term, pretty conservative, a little uncertain. Look, we’re facing election. I think people are hoping for more interest rates drop. So there’s still a lot of uncertainty. But there is, I would say, a slightly elevated amount of hope because those things are going to come to fruition. At least the election is going to come and go, and then hopefully, there’ll be some more interest rate cuts. So from a macro environment, I think long term, it’s looking better. But again, it’s still mixed because of just the overall macro headwinds.

Got it. And Howard, I know you don’t obviously guide quarter-by-quarter for next year, but you are guiding to some margin expansion next year. Could you just talk about maybe how that will flow through throughout the year? And will you be through making the go-to-market changes by the end of this year? Thank you.

Yes. First of all, we are really happy with how we’re progressing in terms of the foundational aspects of the transition and the changes. So those are all on track. Remember, we also talked about the disruption that this is going to cause and we’ve anticipated those and it’s playing out as we expected. And we’ve also always talked about how this transition and the impact of this transition moving into fiscal ‘25, and that still holds and we still believe that. In terms of the margin profile in our initial guide, again, which is early for next year, at 13%, we do believe that there is room to continue to execute to that and continue to have a cadence of beat and raise on that. Remember, though, that it’s still very early at this point. And so our intent in providing both the margin guide and the revenue guide for next year is really to address the variability that we’re seeing, particularly on the top line, to make sure that folks get better clarity in terms of where our expectations are given that it’s quite early at this time. So that’s the best that I can tell you at this point.

And Luv, I want to add, I think I heard in there are we going to be done with this transition by the end of the year. We are in the early stage. We’re one quarter in to this. And as I mentioned in my opening remarks, we’re pleased with where we are in the process. But this is really around hiring. This is really about enabling. This is onboarding. This is ramping. This is putting together, assembling the teams, getting the comp plans and territories in place. But all of those comp plans and territories are not going to be released until sales kick off, which is going to be in January. So I like to tell the team internally, the real work starts then because that’s when the machine has actually started. So it will definitely not be done this year, but Phase-1 of getting us ready will be done.

Got it. Thank you.

Thanks a lot.

We now have Saket Kalia with Barclays. Your line is now open.

Okay, great. Hey, Tooey. Hey, Howard. Thanks for taking my questions here.

Hey, Saket.

Hey, guys. Maybe just to stay on the go-to-market transition. Sorry if I missed it in the prepared remarks, but can we just talk about how many salespeople you brought on this quarter, where you want to be by the end of the year, broad brush, of course, and how you’re sort of planning on minimizing that disruption? I think we’re doing the really smart thing of sort of manhandling estimates for next year, but from a tactical perspective, how do you minimize disruption next year?

Yes. So Saket, I’m probably not going to go into the detail of how many heads and which roles and all of that, there’s just too many to annotate here. But as I mentioned in the opening remarks, it’s a couple of hundred net new. And so it is a considerable amount of change and there’s a lot of work that goes into it. But how we manage it, I think Howard is going to add something to this, but how we manage it really starts with a great plan and then communicating that plan effectively and so people understand not only what is happening, but why we’re doing, what we’re doing, but.

Yes, absolutely. Communication is definitely a part of that, Saket, making sure that folks are brought into the process of enablement, compensation planning and the actual design and organization of the GM structures and the technical roles. That’s what we’re doing right now. Keep in mind that a lot of these changes, particularly around things like territories and comp plans, are not going to take effect until January. And so it’s really human nature to want to look ahead. And so part of what we’re doing to make sure that we communicate early, bring folks into the fold and to participate in this evolution is to really balance looking ahead and being prepared for that but also making sure that they’re focused on delivering Q4, which we still have to get through 2/3 of, which is the biggest quarter of the year. And so really focusing on those communications enablement is key for us.

No, I think that’s really prudent. Tooey, maybe my follow-up for you on a totally different topic, but I’d love to just touch on Procore Pay? What’s been the reception and how you’re feeling about it? I’m sure we’ll hear more at Groundbreak, but can you give us a preview?

Yes. I’m not going to divulge too much because there is going to be a lot at Groundbreak to talk about. But as you remember, last Groundbreak is when we announced Procore Pay. And I think the last thing that we told you all about was in Q1 that we had over 100 customers on the platform. I would say that the enthusiasm has not waned by any measure. It is still a very big bright spot in Procore, which we’re all happy about. And it’s just another reason why we win.

And Saket, I got to say that it’s still very, very minimal in terms of the financial impact for both this year and next year. But we are excited about it.

Makes sense. Thanks guys.

Yes. Thank you.

We now have Brent Bracelin with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead, when you’re ready.

Thank you. Good afternoon. Howard, I really appreciate the preliminary look on next year. As we think about the 11% guide here, I’m curious how much weight did you put on the internal challenges given the go-to-market overhaul versus external being challenging? Just trying to think, is it 50-50? Is it 80-20? Any sort of color as you think about headwinds next year. You have two majors. How did you bake that into the preliminary look here?

Yes. In terms of the external environment, we are right now still anticipating that the challenging demand environment that we’ve seen this year continues through next year. So that was what we’ve contemplated in that guide. But the major factor beyond that from an internal standpoint is that now we’ve got another quarter under our belts. We’ve got just over a quarter of how we’re executing to the foundational pieces and how we’re tracking against that, which is good. And then really, it’s the early guidance being several months earlier, making sure that we apply an incremental level of conservatism in that in terms of how we’re progressing, which is what we expected to. It’s really considering it that way in terms of the fiscal ‘25 guide. And I’ll just say again, it is a floor that we have had confidence that we’ll achieve incremental and above what we would typically do within a fiscal year.

And then Tooey, I guess, just as we take a step back here, you have these external challenges. You got some internal challenges as you make the go-to-market overhaul. But you’re still going to grow double digits next year. You still have a best-in-class gross retention, 94%, 95% here. What’s your best guess windy cyclical headwinds turn into potential tailwinds? I mean do we wait another year? Is it another 2-years? I love the framework of folks that you’re talking to are slightly more hopeful. But walk us through your best guess at this point when you can actually start to see some headwinds turn to tailwinds for you? Thanks.

Yes, Brent, I wish I knew that answer because I would be probably doing a different job if I knew the answer to that. Let me tell you what I think I know about this industry having worked in it my entire life, nothing rapidly changes in one direction, one way or another, really. And so the optimism that’s there, and I should always kind of couch this with it, it is incremental optimism, it’s not exuberant optimism, right. So, I would say if you got a couple more rate cuts, and we get past this election, that the optimism level will have increased a little bit more. But I don’t think our industry moves at such a fast pace that it’s going to make a huge difference in a short-term or short period of time. But I will say, during the COVID time, when the wind was at our back, we know what an optimistic market looks like, and we are hoping someday to get back to something that looks a little bit something like that.

Helpful color. Thanks guys.

Thanks Brent.

We now have Adam Borg with Stifel. Your line is open.

Awesome and thanks for taking the question, and I do appreciate the early look into next year. Maybe for Tooey, in the past, a lot of growth has come from ACV and we have talked a little bit earlier about how things have been kind of status quo this quarter versus earlier in the year. And I think – as I think about kind of the go-to-market evolution and then we think about the opportunity to further penetrate module adoption, how do you think about how that mix evolves over time and the incremental opportunity to sell more of the platform to your customer base?

Well, that is one of the big driving forces behind why we are making this change, Adam, is that we believe that demonstrating the value of our adjacent products to project management, when we do it effectively, we sell a lot of products. So, for us, changing the way we do our go-to-market to really be more customer-centric and then create these tiger teams that are really effective at helping share the value of different products, because remember, we used to sell to just project managers, right, we are selling now to the CFO, we are selling now the head of the VDC department. We’re selling now to the head of safety for an organization. So, these sales motions are all unique and they require specialists. So, for us, the mix will definitely move more towards new product when this new model comes to fruition because we were really heavily weighted towards volume increases for a long time, and we believe that that’s going to change.

That’s really helpful. That’s it for now. Thanks so much.

Sure. Thanks Adam.

Thank you, Adam. We now have Dylan Becker with William Blair. Please go ahead.

Hey guys. Appreciate the question. Tooey, maybe starting for you since you called it out kind of the ample opportunity on the owners side of the equation, not to front-run Groundbreak here either, but could you dive a bit deeper there, because I do think the general perception is that’s kind of largely bucketed as developers, but it feels like there is ample opportunity as we think about kind of global CapEx from other large enterprises.

Yes. No, absolutely. By the way, this is one of my favorite topics because people don’t give us enough credit for the owners business that we have built. I am very proud of our owners business. So, yes, when people think of owners, they usually think of real estate developers. And that’s such a small portion of it. A great way to think about owners, the way I do is, I can tell you 1,000 of them right now, the Fortune 1000 are all owners, right. All of those represent some form of opportunity for Procore. And then you get into hospitality, you get into university, you get into the pub sector, where those folks are owners as well. Every project has an owner. And frankly, every owner has more money than the contractor they are working with. And to me, it’s just a very, very large opportunity in an area where we have already demonstrated tremendous success across all of those sectors. But yes, it’s just an area where doing more is going to yield, I think great results.

Okay. That’s really helpful. And then maybe sticking with you too here, as we talk about kind of the cadence of hiring, right, getting more aggressive as we think about bringing these teams onboard, I guess can you give us a general sense of where these people are coming from and maybe, more importantly, how you are ensuring that you are kind of bringing those right people onboard to sustain maybe the differentiated culture that you guys have done such an exceptional job of building and maintaining over the years? Thanks.

Yes. Dylan, by the way, I am really glad you brought that up because I have been heavily involved in this process. I meet with every new onboarding class, get to know a lot of the folks that are in there. And the caliber and the quality of the folks that we are able to attract has just been remarkable. But you are right, it all starts with our hiring process and our hiring process always starts with our values. And we make sure that we are hiring people that will live to the Procore values and people who are hungry, humble and smart and people that are very, very interested in solving the problems for the industry that we serve. And so we have been very fortunate. So, a lot of these folks, some of them come from industry, some of them come from other sales organizations elsewhere. They kind of are coming from all over. We really are looking for the best and the brightest. And so I am very happy with how we have gotten through our hiring numbers, but more excited about the quality and the caliber of the talent that we brought in. I also should say too, this isn’t just those 200 net new, Larry has done a wonderful job building out his general manager team. Those folks are all in place now. And their teams underneath them are almost all in place and will be done by the end of the year. And so getting the right leadership in place as well as bringing in the right folks that are going to be doing the frontline work is all part of the game, and it is progressing to plan, and that gives me some optimism.

The only other thing I will add, Dylan, is that the process from a culture standpoint, in terms of caliber standpoint, doesn’t stop when these folks step foot in the proverbial door. There is a tremendous amount of enablement that we provide and have orchestrated around this transformation that is critical and integral to the success of the organization and to the individuals that we bring in. And so it’s not just one component, it’s all these components put together.

And Dylan, by the way, I have made my entire leadership team and myself go through all of the sales enablement that we make all of our new hires go through. So, we are eating our own dog food [ph].

That’s great. Thanks guys.

Thank you.

We now have Jason Celino with KeyBanc. Please go ahead.

Hey Tooey. Hey Howard. Thanks for fitting me in. So, maybe one question on the quarter, you saw a 16.4% cRPO growth, it really didn’t budge from last quarter. So, with these go-to-market changes, I guess any way to quantify how disruptive they were because the numbers themselves looks pretty good?

Yes. Look, we are seeing the disruption, Jason, that we anticipated. The cRPO may not be, from a sequential standpoint reflective of that. There is going to be some noise in that, but we are seeing the disruption that we anticipated, and that’s going to continue into Q4. And as I talked about before, it’s going to continue into fiscal ‘25. But things are progressing as we expected, and we are addressing those things proactively to make sure that we still focus on Q4. But it’s progressing as expected in terms of the impacts.

Okay. Excellent. And then we know that RPO and an out-year revenue growth, those are correlated, they tie together. So, your initial outlook for next year, this 11% growth, this floor, is it appropriate to think that this is maybe also kind of a framework for how to think about Q4?

I think you can take that 11%, and re-extrapolate it to what that would imply in Q4. I think that’s the right way to think about it. And I think the main thing you said is what we reiterated, which is that it’s a floor.

Okay. Thank you.

Thanks Jason.

We now have Nick Altmann with Scotiabank. Please go ahead.

Awesome. Thank you. Tooey, in your prepared remarks, you guys talked about how you are seeing some encouraging signs on the go-to-market changes, how it’s resonating with reps and international leaders. But can you maybe share how it’s resonated from the customers’ perspective? I know it’s kind of early days and maybe it’s a little bit more of a 2025 dynamic, but maybe just kind of share how it’s resonating with the installed base?

No, I am glad you asked that question because I have obviously talked to our customers a lot about this and get their feedback. A lot of our customers are just really excited about the customer centricity. We have a customer on site today that was talking about the fact that we surround them with resources, and this is one of our test cases that we are running, and have what a difference it makes that we bring the right people and at the right time to help them be successful. And it’s just a much more coordinated and kind of purposeful engagement. So, the customers are really excited about it. Yes, I have not heard anything negative, but you can imagine, from their perspective, they are getting more resources and they are going to be able to realize more value out of the dollars they are spending with Procore every day, which is great for Procore and it’s great for them.

Great. And then I wanted to circle back to the two of the top five customers being owners. I found that really interesting. When you think about the go-to-market changes, is there any particular stakeholder where you think the changes can be a little bit more impactful in the near-term? And then just going back to Adam’s question on what has historically driven the customer expansion, is the opportunity on the owner side for module up-sell to drive the expansion maybe a little bit more prevalent than the GC side or the sub side? Thanks.

Sure. So, when you talk about stakeholders, no, there is not one particular stakeholder that’s going to benefit any more than the others because customer centricity starts with the customer. It doesn’t matter if it’s an owner, GC or a specialty contractor. And then when it comes to cross-sell, I wouldn’t look at any one of the stakeholders as being any more susceptible or more interested in buying more products from us than maybe other ones. Our products are very – we make them available to all the different stakeholders. And there is a lot of reasons why our stakeholders should buy more Procore products. And it’s kind of our responsibility to help them understand the value that we are offering.

Hey Nick, this is Howard. The way I think about it is there is different cross-sections of our business across geos and segments and stakeholders that are maybe at different stages in terms of their digitization and adoption. And so the typical progression that you will see is you will start to see new logos start with maybe a small set of products and then they will then transition into expanding volume, and then they will eventually transition into additional modules. And when you look across the business, there is different cross-sections that are at different stages, and there is opportunities across all of them.

Great. Thank you.

Yes. Thanks Nick.

Thank you. We have our final question from Siti Panigrahi with Mizuho. Please go ahead when you are ready.

Hi. This is Sameer calling in for Siti. Thanks for taking the question. Just wanted to get a sense of the GTM roles that you were hiring for, you mentioned you are 25% along in the plans. Are you like able to hire the talent as you need or any challenges you see in especially the technology side of things? And second part to that is, when do you expect these new reps to be like fully productive? You mentioned that you will have all sales quotas and territories assigned in Q1. But how long does it take for the sales reps to be like 100% productive? Thank you.

Yes, sure. So, we are not seeing, Sameer, any challenges in any particular roles that we are trying to fill. That’s a very big bright spot for us. On the technical roles, interestingly enough, a fair number of people we are hiring for those technical roles come from industry. So, they actually understand at a very fundamental basis that the problem space in which they are helping to solve for. In a lot of cases, they are Procore users, so they actually understand the solution to that problem as well. And they are very, very effective at speaking to prospects about and customers about these products. So, in general, no, no particular challenges on the hiring front.

Yes. We have seen a tremendous amount of enthusiasm and receptiveness to these roles as we have gone out to hire. So, I don’t think there is an issue there. To your question about when these folks will be ramped, it’s going to depend on the segment that they are in. Obviously, when you start to get into the enterprise and above segments, those ramp times are going to be a little bit longer, and they get shorter as you go mid-market and down. And part of that is the reason why we wanted to get started as early as possible in the middle of this year to make sure that we get those folks onboard and they get started on the ramping, so that more are ramped as we go into the start of next year.

Great. Thank you.

Sure. Thanks Sameer.

Thank you. Thank you all for joining. I can confirm that does conclude today’s question-and-answer session and today’s call. Please enjoy the rest of your day and you may now disconnect from today’s call.