Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Paylocity Q2 2018 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call may be recorded. It is now my pleasure to hand the conference over to Mr. Ryan Glenn, Senior Director of Finance and Investor Relations. Sir, you may begin.

Good afternoon, and welcome to Paylocity's earnings results call for the second quarter of fiscal 2018, which ended on December 31, 2017. I am Ryan Glenn, Senior Director of Finance and Investor Relations; and joining me on the call today is Steve Beauchamp, CEO of Paylocity; and Toby Williams, CFO of Paylocity. Today, we will be discussing the results announced in our press release issued after the market closed. A webcast replay of this call will be available for the next 45 days on our website under the Investor Relations tab. Before beginning, we must caution you that today's remarks in this discussion, including statements made during the question-and-answer session, contain forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to numerous important factors, risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ from the results implied by these or other forward-looking statements. Also, these statements are based solely on the present information and are subject to risks and uncertainties that can cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. For additional information, please refer to our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the risk factors contained therein and other disclosures. We do not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statements. Also, during the course of today's call, we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures. We believe that non-GAAP measures are more representative of how we internally measure the business, and there is a reconciliation schedule detailing these results currently available in our press release, which is located on our website at paylocity.com under the Investor Relations tab and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The nonrevenue financial measures we will discuss today are non-GAAP unless we state the measure as GAAP. Please note that we are unable to reconcile any forward-looking non-GAAP financial measure to their directly comparable GAAP financial measure because the information which is needed to complete a reconciliation is unavailable at this time without unreasonable effort. In regards to our upcoming conference schedule, Steve and I will be attending the JMP Securities Technology Conference in San Francisco on February 26; Toby and I will be attending the Raymond James Institutional Investors Conference in Orlando on March 6; and Toby will be attending the William Blair Technology One-on-One Conference in Boston on March 14. With that, let me turn the call over to Steve.

Thank you, Ryan, and thanks to all of you for joining us on our second quarter fiscal 2018 earnings call. We posted strong results in the second quarter of fiscal 2018, with total revenue of $86 million, an increase of 25.3% versus the same period last year. Recurring revenue grew by 25.7%, driven by new client additions, improved HCM product penetration and an increase in interest income on funds held for clients. Adjusted EBITDA expanded from $9.9 million or 14.4% of revenue in the second quarter of fiscal 2017 to $15.2 million or 17.7% of revenue in the second quarter of fiscal 2018. The increased leverage in the business continues to translate to improved operating cash flow, which more than doubled versus the first six months of last fiscal year. We did receive a number of awards and accolades during the second quarter. We were very pleased to be recognized as Number 29 on Glassdoor's Annual Employer of Choice Award in the large employer category. This is the third time we've been recognized as an employer of choice in Glassdoor's annual rankings and the second time in the large employer category. Paylocity was also recognized as one of the 2017 Best and Brightest Companies to Work for in the nation by the National Association for Business Resources. Finally, we were once again ranked on Deloitte's list of 500 fastest-growing technology companies in North America. This is the fifth year in a row that we've been included on the Fast 500 list. The second fiscal quarter is an important time of year for our sales organization as many medium-sized businesses look to change providers at the start of the calendar year. We had good sales execution in our core target market albeit with a slightly smaller average client size, including another…

Thanks, Steve. Total revenue for the quarter was $86 million, which represents a 25.3% increase from the same period in the prior year. For the second quarter, our total recurring revenue of $83.1 million was up 25.7% from the year ago quarter and represented 97% of our total revenue. Recurring fees were up 24.4% in the quarter, and interest income on client funds was up 143.9% year-over-year as a result of balance increases, increased average interest rates and because we are currently investing approximately $100 million of client funds in high-quality marketable securities. Implementation services and other revenue was $2.9 million for the second quarter, up 13.7% from the year ago quarter. Our adjusted recurring gross profit on recurring revenues was $61.5 million or 74% in the second quarter, up from $47.9 million or 72.5% in the year ago quarter, which is a 150-basis point improvement. Adjusted gross profit in the second quarter was $53.6 million, representing a gross profit margin of 62.3%, as compared to $41.2 million or 60% in the year ago quarter, which is a 230-basis point improvement. The improvements we saw in adjusted recurring and adjusted total margin are primarily a result of the natural scale in our business and the increasing penetration of our HCM products, which carry lower implementation fees. If I turn to our operating expenses. As Steve mentioned, we have continued to make substantial investments in research and development. In order to understand our overall investment in R&D, it is important to combine both what we expense and what we capitalize. On a combined non-GAAP basis, total R&D investments were $11.7 million or 13.6% of revenue in the second quarter compared to $9.7 million or 14.2% of revenue in the year ago quarter. On a dollar basis, our year-over-year investment in total…

Thank you, sir. [Operator Instructions] And our first question will come from the line of Justin Furby with William Blair. Your line is now open.

Hi guys. This is actually Vinay on for Justin. Steve, I had a quick question for you. Just on the demand environment and pipeline, is there anything that you'd want to call out that you're seeing in this calendar quarter? And then if you can provide any commentary on productivity in the sales force, that will be helpful. And then I have a follow-up for Toby.

Sure, yes. I think, as I said in the prepared comments, we were pretty pleased to be able to be increase guidance a little bit and continue to gain momentum. It's a pretty important time of year. We get a lot of new starts in January. And so, we had a successful selling season. Certainly, we always love to see more productivity if possible, but I think we were pretty happy with being able to give a slight increase to guidance and be able to hit our numbers for the quarter.

Got it. And then Toby, if you could provide any additional commentary on the cash flow performance. I know some of the leverage went through, but is there anything else to call out there?

I mean, I wouldn't say so. I think most of what you're seeing there is just from a - result from operations. I mean, I think there's a little bit of noise from tenant improvement allowance in the quarter. But I think that's really - that's the only thing that I'd call out there, nothing else.

Got it. Thanks.

Thank you. And our next question will come from the line of Scott Berg with Needham. Your line is now open.

Hi, Steve and Toby, congrats on a good quarter, and thanks for taking the questions. Quick piggyback, Toby, on the last question there on cash flows. Is there any reason not to see the improvement that you saw in the first half of the year carried forward into the second half of the year? Just because the growth was so big in the first half.

Yes, I mean, we're guiding towards not the same type of leverage on the back half of the year from an EBITDA perspective. So, I think you're not going to see that same type of percentage increase just because a lot of that EBITDA translates into cash flow. So that's probably the one thing I would mention. Anything else?

No, I agree with that.

Got it. And then Steve, I wanted to see if you can quantify your comments on sales and marketing investments here in the back half of this year and next year. Is that more driven in a particular area or product - maybe it's more inside sales, to drive some upsells a little bit more efficiently? I just wanted to maybe get some color there.

Sure, yes. I think any time that we have a really strong front half of the year from an adjusted EBITDA perspective, we look at investment opportunities on the back half. So, I think that's kind of normal cadence for us. And we typically will target those investment opportunities in terms of hiring people for the sales force, getting them on as early as we possibly can. We won't finalize what our headcount is until we're going into the year but we certainly can get a good start on that. So, I would say some of it's people-oriented in terms of headcount. And I think the second thing are marketing opportunities, where we think we can maybe have an impact from a lead gen perspective that will ultimately translate through the sales funnel to increased sales. So, it's all booking a ramp going into fiscal 2019.

Got it. That’s all I have at the moment. Thanks for taking the questions.

Thank you. And our next questions will come from the line of Nandan Amladi with Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open.

Hi, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. So, Steve, you touched on this a little bit, but this is about the time of year you begin to hire a new sales headcount in preparation for next fiscal year. Do you feel like you're on track? And will the team growth be relatively consistent with historical trends?

Yes. So, I think our process is as we get through year-end and we start the planning process really kind of more in the spring time frame for next fiscal year, we start to try to look at what's the number of headcount we think we need to be able to hit our revenue targets for next year. And as I just mentioned earlier, we'd certainly like to be in a position where we give our sales team the go-ahead to start that recruiting process earlier than we've kind of come to target. So, I don't think we have the right target. We increased headcount last year about 25%. We're certainly focused on continuing to go after our long-term model of 20%-plus growth, and I think when we put all that into the hopper, we'll come up with the right number. But I think the important point is stronger performance from an EBITDA perspective on the front half of the year gives us the ability to start that process right now, and there's no question. We've historically seen the earlier we get these people on board, the faster we get through that ramp-up period and the bigger impact they can have next fiscal.

All right. And a follow-up on the seasonality. Is there anything unusual about this upcoming March quarter? Because you said you staffed up ahead of the inbound call traffic that you were expecting. The average customer size was a little bit smaller, but you have more product to sell them. Or the ACA stuff has probably anniversaried now. So, we shouldn't see anything. But any other onetime factors we should keep in mind?

No, just the normal seasonality, where we have a little - a boost to the revenue in terms of W-2 revenue. So that's obviously all been factored in and doesn't have any impact on a year-over-year basis, but there would be no real other color besides that.

Okay, great. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question will come from the line of Siti Panigrahi with Wells Fargo. Your line is now open.

Thanks for taking my question. Just piggyback on that last question on the education you did see in January, where most of your - no, majority of your customer, they switch platform. And you talked about average customer size - customer client size is smaller. So, could you give some color in terms of comparison that last year, last few years? And the other thing is ADP talked about getting good traction of their Workforce Now product this quarter. Are you seeing any kind of impact from that in this quarter?

Yes. So, I would say, in the prepared remarks, I highlighted the fact that six months into the year, we feel like client growth is in the same range that it was last year at this time. So, we feel really good about that. As we scale the sales force, being able to bring on clients is a very important part of our growth formula. I think the second part of the comment was we are seeing good penetration rate of our new products, and that is driving a higher average per employee per year attach rates for those new customers. So that's positive. I think that's just slightly offset. When you look at the client size, we're just seeing more demand kind of in our core marketplace. Our average-sized customer is around 120 employees. And if you remember, probably 1.5 years ago, we talked about 50% of our clients being less than 50. So that's where most of the customers are. We're having traction there, but on the flip side, sometimes that has a little bit of an impact to that average revenue per customer with the size being a little bit smaller. But for us, really hitting those unit numbers is positive.

And then on that expense management and recruiting, that's now more than a year old. Just wondering, like what's the penetration of those modules within your installed base right now? You usually talk about like 10% to 20% in one or two years.

Yes. I'd say just to give you a little bit of color on that, we feel good about both those modules. I think recruiting is probably a little bit ahead from a pace perspective and is getting into that kind of target range of 10% to 20% within a couple of years. I think expense management is on the right track. It's probably just a little bit behind where recruiting is but both - really good reception on both of them and also importantly, really good feedback from the customers that are using the platform. We've got dedicated agile teams that continue to enhance those products. So, we also feel like there's opportunity for us to increase those penetration rates over time.

Perfect. Thank you. I appreciate the color.

And our next question will come from the line of Terry Tillman with SunTrust Robinson. Your line is open.

Hi Steve and Toby, congrats on the quarter as well for me. Steve, just the first question, it's a little bit related to in your prepared remarks around maybe with the new units a little bit more leveraged to less than 50 employees. I guess what I'm curious about is - because you did call it out and so it must have been a little bit of a shift. And I'm curious, is that - was that just related to your channel and your partners that maybe they were more exposed to 50 employees and below? Or was it more in the direct side? And do you actually think that, that could stay consistent like that? Or do you think that can actually just swing around a lot?

Yes, I think the positive side of the equation is broker referrals were once again above 25%. So that was pretty consistent, and I think we said in the past they do tend to refer a slightly smaller customer than our direct channel. So, I wouldn't say they're a driver because it's been pretty consistent, but what we're seeing is the demand kind of - in this kind of sub-100 employee marketplace where the broader platform does seem to be growing. We're pretty happy with the fact that customers are looking for something that goes beyond payroll, and they're really spending time evaluating the HCM modules. I think on the flip side, there's an opportunity for us to continue to execute at the top end of our target market so that we don't have the same type of average client decline. So that's something that we're going to focus on going forward. But I'm very happy to see the unit growth be similar to last year. I'm really happy with the penetration rates on the products.

Okay, that's good to hear. And I guess my second and last question is just as it relates to the actual hiring environment for salespeople. And also, how tough is it? I mean, there's a war for talent. How tough is it in terms of hiring now versus maybe the last couple of seasons in terms of your hiring? And then secondly, as it relates to the people that actually have to help deploy the software, is there any kind of governing kind of factor on your growth in terms of - are you able to keep finding a lot of people to help make these deployments successful?

Yes, it's a fair question. I think if you go back three or four years ago, really, our gating factor on growth was really implementation resources and finding those people, getting them trained internally and getting them up and running. I think now that you see our growth kind of in this 20%-plus range, the gating factor is definitely more on the sales side in terms of bringing on the people, getting them productive. We've been able to bring on a number of implementation resources across the product platform and do that very successfully in addition to, as we grow, we're able to grow that talent from within. So, I think that's not necessarily an area of concern for us.

All right. Thanks.

Thank you. And our next question will come from the line of Corey Greendale with First Analysis. Your line is now open.

Thanks. This is Ken Wang on for Corey. Thanks for taking my question. Just wondering if you can speak to whether revenue growth, the split between new customers and upsell, has changed during the quarter. And do you have any expectation for any change for the remainder of fiscal year 2018?

Sure. I certainly don't know what's going to happen the rest of the year. We incent our sales force to go and get annualized, new revenue. But from a first six months of the year perspective, unit growth is very similar to last year. We are seeing higher product penetration rates so that ARPU number is positive, but it is offset a little bit with slightly smaller client sizes. So, we definitely are focused on that. We like the fact that there's receptivity down-market. That's where most of the customers are, but we still think we have an opportunity to execute at the top end of our target market. And so, we think that remains an opportunity for us to make some improvement. But overall, in terms of looking at the mix between units and products, if you take out this client size, slight difference, it's pretty similar.

Okay. Thanks. And then just on the compensation management and survey modules, so I know it' s still very early, but have you seen any change in your client conversations as a result of releasing these modules?

No. What I would say to you is thematically, as we've released more capability and more capability for the managers and the employees to be using, a lot of these conversations do move away simply from automating manual processes. And they get to conversations that are more about engagement, employee interactions, employee engagement. And so, things like surveys and the ability to be able to take temperature checks of the employee base, gather feedback, analyze the data, are really becoming pretty important elements of that conversation. We just have another feature that's been growing pretty quickly in terms of the ability to journal conversations and do performance management on an ongoing basis instead of waiting until annually. So, I would say just thematically, those conversations become a little less transactional and much more about engaging with your employees and driving recruitment efforts and retention efforts in the employee base.

Got it. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question will come from the line of Brian Peterson with Raymond James. Your line is now open.

Hi, and thanks for taking the questions. So, I wanted to hit a bit on the bookings dynamic in some of the customer segments you mentioned and how that may impact revenue. So, if your mix is shifting more towards clients that are smaller, does that actually mean that you recognize revenue or the implementations for those clients are quicker? Or is that maybe offset because you could be having more modules with those clients? How should we be thinking about that?

I think Steve's point on the modules, he's kind of hit that, but I think I wouldn't see any material impact in terms of recognizing the revenue faster. I mean, I think there's not enough of a - we're not seeing enough of a shift that would say the implementation times are being changed in any material way.

Got it. And just one question on sales productivity. I know you guys managed to kind of - revenue dollar bookings. But if you think about potential productivity improvements for your sales force, do you think there's a bigger opportunity from potentially just selling more clients? Or is there bigger opportunity to expand per employee per month?

Yes, we're obviously always trying to focus on making improvements across the board. I would say the receptivity down-market certainly gives us some optimism that we can continue to drive unit growth. On the flip side, the additional products that we're releasing, as those products continue to strengthen, we think that also helps us upmarket a little bit. And so, I would tell you I think from a longer-term perspective, we're going to focus on both of those areas and would be very happy if we can drive improvements in both categories.

Great. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question will come from the line of Brad Reback with Stifel. Your line is now open.

Great. Thanks very much. Steve, as you think about the increased sales and marketing spend that you mentioned, without getting too specific on numbers, as you look into 2019, do you think revenue grows faster than sales and marketing? Or does sales and marketing grow faster than revenue?

We're not there yet in terms of our planning processes. At this point in time, we're just focused on taking advantage of the strong first half performance on adjusted EBITDA and making those investments as early as possible. And so, we've obviously forecasted that into the guidance that we've given as well. So, you can kind of get a sense of order of magnitude in terms of what that looked like. We're just talking about investing a little bit earlier probably has more of an impact on the fourth quarter than it does on the third. And then we'll see what we think going into next year, but I'm just not in a position yet to give you any color on next year's sales and marketing spend.

Great. And if I may, just one more question on this smaller customer size. Does that have anything to do with competition a little further up market? Or was it just where the pipeline fell out this quarter?

I wouldn't say this is a long-term trend. We saw this in the first half of the year. I thought it was important just to call out because when we get to the end of the year and we look at ARPU, we're going to have to dissect between average customer size and product penetration for the first time. We've still got six months here on the back half of the year. So, we'll see if that trend does continue. I don't think at this point in time, we believe it's competitive-market-driven. It's probably just our own execution and where most of the businesses are and most of the opportunity is in front of us.

Great. Thanks very much.

Thank you. And our next question will come from the line of Ross MacMillan with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now open.

Thanks a lot. Sorry, Steve, just to kind of beat the dead horse here. But just January is on the small - slightly skewed towards smaller in the first half. Is that consistent with your marketing program? So, when I think about lead gen that ultimately all your sales folks are taking their lead from, is that also skewing down-market? Or was that less skewed and it just so happened that your sales folks ended up closing more business in these smaller average customers?

Yes. What I would say to you is I think if you look at the 600,000 businesses in our target market of 20 to 1,000 employees, you're going to have a natural skew kind of in the sub-100 and there's even more in the sub-50 and so on. So, I think you've just got a lot of businesses down at the lower end of our market. And as we continue to grow the sales force and grow kind of our lead gen channel, there is some logic to the fact that you're going to get more lead activity at the lower end of that space. And so, from our perspective, this probably wasn't necessarily a target approach. It's probably a function of us growing new organization and staying focused on the same target market we have been historically focused on more than any type of difference in lead gen activity.

And then you've talked a lot historically about you don't - your dollar comp - dollar quota is, rather, based on just dollars. They're not dissected between units or customers or employees, employees per customer nor number of modules per customer. It's just a quota. So, from that regard in the quarter and you think about your plan - I'm sorry if I missed this earlier, but were you on? Were you at target in terms of that hitting your bookings plan?

Yes, I don't think we get into the specifics around booking. Obviously, we felt like the quarter was strong enough that we were able to raise the year slightly from a guidance perspective. And the biggest variable for us on beating or hitting our guidance is driven by the sales organization. So that certainly will give you a flavor on performance. But I think to your point, we're - we still think there's a huge opportunity in front of us. We've got an opportunity to continue to grow units aggressively. And we also believe with the investments we're making in R&D and the penetration rates that we're seeing that we have an opportunity to grow product penetration. And ultimately, we think we have a really strong value proposition across our target market from 20 employees all the way to 1,000.

Great, thanks so much. And congrats.

Thank you. And our next questions will come from the line of Pat Walravens with JMP Securities. Your line is now open.

Oh, great. Thank you. Steve, so competitively, if you look at sort of the traditional service bureaus, the Ceridian, ADP, Paychex, are any of them getting a little bit better?

Well, definitely, it's always been a competitive market. It certainly is a competitive market today. And I think everybody in this marketplace understands that this is a software sale that's largely occurring. There's clearly a service component, but this is the platform in terms of where the valuation is made. And everybody is investing in the platform. So, what I would tell you is I feel really good about our pace of innovation, not only the modules that we're adding but the features that we're adding. And although many of our competitors are making improvements, we do feel like for our target market, we are very well positioned and able to win. So, I think part of the answer is yes. Everyone kind of gets better over time and you kind of have to, to be able to compete. And so, it's probably more important to look at your pace of innovation relative to others, and we feel good about that part.

Great. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question will come from the line of Shankar Subramanian with Bank of America. Your line is open.

Hi, thanks for taking the question. Congrats on the quarter. I have a question on the 1,000 employee or 500,000 employee and above. Last quarter, you talked about the increased interest in - from that customer segment at the end of your annual event. Can you talk about the conversations you're having with those clients and what are they interested? And when do you kind of expect that part of the market to kind of drive the - your unit growth?

Yes, I don't think or I didn't intend to communicate that we have a focus on 1,000-plus employees. I think when asked the question, I said over time, as we continue to invest in the product portfolio, it's possible that we can become a little bit more appealing to those clients that are larger. And I think that's absolutely the case. But our clear focus is to be a dominant player in that mid-market. And then we do have clients over 1,000 employees. And oftentimes, they go through an evaluation process and they find that what we have is a great fit for them and we can be competitive in those situations. We definitely win business there. It's just not necessarily our primary focus. We're definitely focused on the 20 to 1,000 space. When it works over 1,000, we absolutely would bring those customers on. And I think that's kind of how we look at the opportunity.

Got it. And then another question on the PEPM. I think last quarter, you mentioned your PEPM opportunity is $320. Now given the investment you are making in R&D, which is growing pretty rapidly, how do you - how should we think about the growth in PEPM? Do you see, kind of fiscal 2019, see exponential upside in terms of PEPM opportunity as going to be a steady growth?

Yes. I think I would look at our history of growth. So over four years, we've gone from $200 per employee per year to $320 per employee per year. That's probably the best way to kind of look at it. A lot of the increased investment in R&D goes to a variety of things, and that's making the feature set stronger. We don't just build the product and then we're done. We talked about recruiting and expense. We have teams dedicated to making those products better based off our client feedback over time. So, I would look at our history in terms of kind of - our PEPY increase is probably the best predictor of what we're doing going forward.

Thank you. That’s all I have.

Thank you. And our next question will come from the line of Mark Marcon with Robert W. Baird. Your line is now open.

Good afternoon. Let me add my congratulations and thanks for taking the questions. With regards to the PEPY, can you talk a little bit about what you're seeing on the down-market in terms of, like, the change in behavior in terms of how many modules they typically are becoming interested in? Because it does seem we're - the world is getting more complicated and there's probably more diverse needs.

Yes. So, I would say if I were to call out a category where we're seeing increased level of interest in maybe slightly smaller clients, it would be the talent category for us. So, whether that's our recruiting product, our onboarding product, we're definitely seeing what we think is higher levels of interest in those products. Compensation and surveys is still relatively new. So - but pretty good, early traction early on. But I think as the economy continues to grow, the war for talent gets a little bit more challenging. We see our customers wanting to make sure they have the most modern platform to really engage with their employees in a way that makes them competitive.

Great. And so, with those smaller clients, what sort of increase are you actually seeing in terms of the PEPY that if there's a way to dimensionalize it in terms of relative to not necessarily last year, but a few years ago, just thinking broadly?

Yes. I would say hard to kind of give you numbers around that. We'll - obviously, at the end of this year, we'll give you the number of clients that we have. You'll be able to look at what our overall penetration rates look like in terms of per employee per year because we'll give you an average-sized customer. I think the point I was trying to make on this call was you know what our revenue growth is. Units are pretty similar to last year. It kind of gives you a sense of how we're doing from an ARPU perspective.

Okay. And then can you - this is also a time of the year when clients turn over. And just wondering, can you talk a little bit about client satisfaction, retention rates? I know that at the end of the year, we'll get the full color, but it sounds like things have been getting better.

I would say our operations team did a fantastic job this year-end, managing the increased volume. As I mentioned in the prepared remarks, going in staffed is always very important. And so, we were able to get W-2s to customers' hands efficiently, manage the tax law changes, produce 1095s and handle all the extra questions that we get at this time of year. So yes, we've had very consistent performance from a revenue retention above 92%, and we definitely had above 92% again this quarter when you look at the trailing 12 months.

Great. And then a quick question for Toby. Can you talk a little bit about the client fund balances and how that structure is going and what you would expect over the current - the next 12 months in terms of the balance growth?

Sure. So, we had average daily balances around the $875 million mark in Q2. I think we saw a boost there or benefit from the balance increases, increased average interest rates. And because we're investing a portion of the client funds in, as I said in the prepared remarks, the high-quality marketable securities. I think everybody understands the interest rate environment that we're in. Guidance doesn't reflect that. But I mean, to the extent that there is further rate increases, we would certainly get the benefit of that. I think it's a little bit hard to map it exactly just because we don't - I think as Steve has said before, we don't always get the benefit immediately upon a rate increase, but that's generally how we think about it.

Do you think the balances will end up growing commensurate with revenue just in terms of the unit growth?

I mean, it will...

Maybe you'd look at unit growth rather than revenue growth as being a better predictor?

Yes.

Now remember, the federal tax law change will lower balances from a federal perspective a little and then you've got to look at what all the states are doing but - so I think that has a slight impact. So, you would think it would be slightly less than unit growth [indiscernible].

Great. Thank you.

Thank you. And our next question will come from the line of Abhey Lamba with Mizuho. Your line is now open.

Yes, thanks. This is Parthiv on for Abhey. Just a follow-up to a prior question. On the productivity ramp for new hires maybe that have come onboard in the past six to nine months, is that ramp generally in line with expectations in your internal blend?

Yes, I would tell you that, that's always the key variable that we're focused on. I mean, we bring on a fair number of reps, last year 25% more reps, and we've been kind of around that number, even a little higher at times in the last four years. So, we're always focused on improving productivity. I think we feel like we've got the right training and development program in place, but the reality is the earlier you get them on, the better it is. And so, going into the back half of the year, we really like the opportunity to bring on as many hires as possible. We think we've kind of got a proven track record of ramping people, but it is something that we're constantly focused on improving because that can really impact the following fiscal year if we can move that needle at all.

Okay, got it. And then on the topic of non-payroll attach rates, you just talked about the revenue retention rate in the 92% range. That's on a gross basis, I believe. What - can you talk to maybe what that metric looks like on a net basis once you bake in upsells and expansion activity?

Yes, sure. So, we do focus on and disclose the calculation specifically. So, you can go look at that, but it is more of a gross basis. We'd still tell you that we don't do a kind of upsell. I'll go back to comments I made prior. We have a small team who's focused on upselling back to the client base, and there are times that our sales reps will actually upsell back to the client base as well. But most of that average revenue per customer increase is coming from selling more product to new customers. We do think there's an opportunity to continue to gradually increase that. So that is something that we will do. We did this past fiscal year. We'll look at that again going into next year, but that's more of a gradual process than some sort of big change. So, I think the consistency of our revenue retention, the consistency in terms of the way we calculate it, we feel really good about being in mid-market and having greater than 92% revenue retention for really as long as we've been measuring it.

Okay, prefect. Thanks for taking the question.

Thank you. And there are no further questions in the queue. So now it's my pleasure to hand the conference back over to Mr. Steve Beauchamp, Chief Executive Officer, for some closing comments and remarks.

Well, I just wanted to take a brief moment to thank everybody for logging on and all of their interest in Paylocity and to give one last thanks to all of our employees whose dedication and hard work made us have a really positive experience for our clients through year-end. Thanks, everybody.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation on today's conference. This does conclude our program, and we may all disconnect. Everybody, have a wonderful day.