Greetings, and welcome to the Pebblebrook Hotel Trust Third Quarter Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Raymond Martz, Co-President and Chief Financial Officer. Thank you. You may begin.

Thank you, Donna, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to our third quarter 2023 earnings call and webcast. Joining me today is Jon Bortz, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Tom Fisher, our Co-President and Chief Investment Officer. But before we start, a reminder that today's comments are effective only today, October 27, 2023, and our comments may include forward-looking statements under federal securities laws. Actual results could differ materially from our comments. Please refer to our latest SEC filings for a detailed discussion of potential risk factors and our website for reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures referred to during our call. Now let's turn our attention to our Q3 results. We are pleased to report that despite 2 negative weather events and continuing entertainment industry strikes in LA, we were able to achieve same-property hotel EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted FFO at the top end of our outlook due to a continued recovery in corporate group and transient demand across many of our urban markets, and solid cost controls and gradually moderating expense environment. Washington, D.C. led the rebound with hotel occupancy surging an impressive [ 13 points, 68% ] and RevPAR increasing 21.4%. This was closely followed by San Francisco, which climbed over 10 occupancy points, 72%, with RevPAR up 13.1%. In Los Angeles, our occupancy improved nearly 6 points to a healthy 78%, with RevPAR growing 5%. Significantly, weekday occupancies at our urban hotels, a good bellwether business travel demand, rose to a solid 75.4%, up from 72.3% in the prior year quarter and a meaningful recovery over last year. Our urban properties also gained from a resurgence in leisure travel, particularly during the summer, bolstered by concerts and other leisure cultural events. Consequently, weekend, urban occupancies elevated to an impressive 82.3%, almost surpassing our weekend resort…

Thanks, Ray. I'd like to touch on 3 topics this morning. First, our observations on industry trends. Second, I intend to discuss our ongoing strategic capital allocation program and our continuing pivot from a heavy urban and business travel focused investment company to a more balanced portfolio, more evenly split between business and leisure and between urban and resort. And then third, I'll talk about our outlook for the fourth quarter. In terms of industry trends, it's fair to say the industry has seen a flattening out of the recovery in demand on an overall basis. In fact, the industry was unable to successfully absorb even the smallest amount of supply growth in Q3, with overall industry occupancy declining, albeit slightly in every month in Q3, a trend that continues from Q2. We were surprised that this trend did not reverse in Q3. However, the revenge travel related to outbound international and cruising this year seems to have overwhelmed improving demand in business travel and international inbound travelers. We believe business travel, both group and transient, continues to gradually recover. Leisure on the other hand, has declined slightly as international outbound travel and cruising rebounded to above pre-pandemic levels. An international inbound travel, especially leisure has only gradually returned. The leisure softness has primarily been reflected at resorts, while urban weekend occupancies have continued to recover. We believe next year, leisure will normalize at higher levels of domestic travel as we lap this revenge travel and international inbound continues its gradual recovery. The resurgence in business travel we've seen is evident by the improving occupancies in the urban and top 25 markets, specifically during weekdays. This trend is particularly strong in the luxury and upper upscale segments, hotels, which are predominantly located in major cities. The STR data for Q3…

[Operator Instructions] The first question today is coming from Dori Kesten of Wells Fargo.

I think operating expenses, if you hold to the site, energy taxes insurance is in the 3% to 4% range for Q4, do you think that's fair as a run rate for the medium term?

Dori, yes, I mean, I think that's certainly in the ballpark. And obviously, the more volume we do, either in occupancy or food and beverage or other revenue activities. But there'll be expenses that are tied to that, and we'll see growth in expenses at a higher level. But as a baseline for sort of a stabilized operation, I think that's reasonable.

Okay. And just within that, would you expect your total RevPAR to continue to outpace RevPAR?

Yes. Yes. We think -- and in particular, we think as group continues to recover that volume will be apparent in our food and beverage revenues and many of our other revenues, and that should also help with the margins on the F&B side.

The next question is coming from Bill Crow of Raymond James.

Jon, hopefully, you can hear me better than I can hear you.

Sorry about that.

Could you talk about, group for next year and the outlook and which markets might be the better markets, which ones might be the worst markets?

Sure. So currently, our pace for group for next year is positive. Let me see if I can pull it up here. So we're currently sitting at a revenue pace advantage of about 14.4%. That is about 10.5% for group. It's almost 30% for transient. Again, those are small numbers in terms of how much transients on the books, so the percentages should be ignored. But in total, we're up 12.2% in room nights, 1.9% in ADR, 14.4% in total pace. Group is up 8.7% in room nights, 1.7% in rate and revenue on the books is up 10.5% year-over-year. The stronger markets next year include Chicago, San Diego and Washington, D.C. Boston will be probably flat on a year-over-year basis, but actually, it's at a very high level for this year. And then we see San Francisco, which is up in the first half of the year will be down substantially in the second half of the year with some of the cancellations that occurred over the last 12 months. So that's, I think, how they generally break out within our portfolio.

And then, Bill, just a little color on the convention calendars for '24. In D.C., the room nights on the books '24 versus '23 is up about 32%. San Diego is up about 17%. Chicago is up 13% and Boston and L.A. are flattish. And as we know San Francisco is down mostly in the second half of '24.

I just wanted to follow up on the question that Dori asked earlier about the expense normalization, I know she cut out property taxes, insurance and energy. But that's kind of like cutting up food and housing in CPI. So where is expense growth? Where do you think it's going to be next year? Are we looking at another year of, call it, 5% expense growth. And I guess the question I keep getting from investors is, at what point does 3% RevPAR growth translate into growing margins and EBITDA?

Well, you should ask them what their predictions are for inflation because that's really what's driving the increases in the industry that we see. I think the intent of cutting out those 3 categories was not to say they're not important. It was because they tend to be more volatile on a year-over-year basis, particularly property taxes, which are volatile, not because of volatility on the part of cities raising the tax rates, but because we tend to be unsatisfied with the initial assessments that we get because the cities are trying to keep as much revenue as they can, as you and I have talked about before. And as a result of that, it takes us 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years in some cases to fight through the process to get successful appeals and reduced assessments. And when that happens, tends to have a multiyear effect on property taxes for those properties in terms of true-up because we're accruing them at the levels generally that we get the bills at and then we have reductions when we get those bills reduced. And so because of how long it takes, we also generally don't know, and it's hard to forecast when those things are going to occur. So as it relates to that one, when we look at next year, Bill, it will be likely a headwind for us from a expense growth perspective because we're going to be coming off 3 quarters, the first 3 quarters of this year where property taxes actually declined in our portfolio significantly because of productions we got and true-ups that we got. So it doesn't represent a run rate because it's being impacted by these true-ups. Now we hope we'll get some true-ups next year. We don't know when those processes will be successful. And we expect to get true-ups over the next 3 or 4 years, frankly, from these pandemic years when the assessments didn't come down. But as we all know, the values have come down dramatically. So we'll have to come up with those numbers as it relates to the run rate on the property taxes and look at what percentage impact that will have on the overall revenues. But it'll have some -- it's going to have some impact on an overall basis. Insurance, Ray, I mean, you can speak to that.

Yes. So Bill, we know insurance. The good news is we pretty much know what the cost is going to be here over the next couple of quarters because as part of our renewal on June 1 that those rates did increase. So over the next couple of quarters through the second quarter, we know we'll continue to have this as a headwind, and we'll have to see what happens at the renewal. Now if you look back to what happened after [ Katrina ], same thing happened where the rates got jacked up, the year following Katrina, that stayed elevated for 2 years, it was a pretty benign storm environment, and then they started declining double-digit rates for a number of years. We refer those as the good years, by the way, as opposed to our insurance carriers. So we'll have to see what happens this year. Typically, proper insurance unlike other expenses tends to go up and down. So we could be looking a year from now, property insurance being lower than it is now, unlike things like wages and other costs that tend to be stickier and stay up there.

Okay. All right. But it sounds like when you put all together, it's likely that margins are probably going to have a tough time being flat next year just with all these [ fed wins ]. I mean maybe I misunderstood, but that would be my takeaway.

Yes. I think that's -- it depends what revenue growth we see. We're going to need to see 4% plus revenue growth, I think, to get to flat margins next year, and we're going to need to be higher than that. Now we have some tailwinds related to the fact that we had a significant disruption this year and lost revenues and that will help provide a tailwind for that growth rate next year. And then it will depend upon how much share we gain next year through the investments we've made and then, of course, what the macro environment looks like.

The next question is coming from Floris Van Dijkum of Compass Point.

Appreciate taking my question. So I know we can get bogged down in the minutia of insurance, and it's an important aspect and same thing with the property taxes. But as I'm just thinking about this bigger picture, you guys have invested nearly $300 million of revenue-enhancing investment capital into your portfolio to upgrade and enhance your portfolio over the last couple of years. There have been obviously -- and a big chunk of that has actually been invested since last year. You haven't had the benefits of any of that. And you've had the detraction of, call it, $12 million to $13 million of renovation disruption this year in terms of EBITDA. Again, what I'm trying to get at is to get a run rate for adjusted EBITDA going forward that should be significantly despite all these concerns about margins, et cetera, you should theoretically have, call it, $30 million to $40 million, maybe even $50 million higher EBITDA than what you had this year. If I just do the math on the capital that you've invested in your portfolio and next year sort of being a first full year of stabilized or putting earnings, if you will. Maybe if you can talk a little bit about the run rate of earnings power of your portfolio going forward?

Yes. I mean, I think that's what we've tried to lay out in our investor presentation and some of our prior calls for us that there's significant upside. Now some of that some of the share gains from the investments we've made have occurred. But others, as we've shown in the investor presentation with the bridge that we have are in the future, that will be next year, that will be the year after, that will be the year after that and probably some in the year after that. These major repositionings tend to take 3 to 4 years, and they -- we gained share more quickly in good years and strong years and otherwise takes longer if the environment is flatter. So there's significant upside from the investments we've made. The dollars are out the door. We -- that impacts our balance sheet, obviously. And that's the good part is the investments have already been made. And as you say, the investment side, the return side is still to come. And so -- it's hard for us to lay out exactly what that looks like from a timing perspective. And we haven't even started our process with our property teams about what next year looks like. But we do have a good pace going into next year. We're encouraged that the macro side is at least any slowdown has been deferred. Who knows, maybe it gets eliminated, but I think more likely deferred or softer. So we're -- you can tell we're a little cautious given the macro environment. But when we get through this overhang of when is the recession coming or when is the slowdown going to be here, I think we're going to be more confident about the timing of when we're going to see the significant returns from those dollars that have been invested. But definitely next year, we have the tailwind of not having all that disruption within the portfolio.

And Jon, if I can maybe just follow up on that. Typically, the returns that you would expect to get from this revenue-enhancing CapEx would be minimum of 10%. I mean, what historically -- what's the range been in terms of that -- the returns on that investment on a stabilized basis?

Yes. On a stabilized basis, we tend to get to 10% plus depending upon the extensiveness of the redevelopment. Generally, the larger the redevelopment, the higher the returns on those. And look, it's not perfect in terms of every property, some end up being lower, some end up being higher. Some of that gets impacted by the market and competition, et cetera. But we've averaged out at 10% plus.

The next question is coming from Aryeh Klein of BMO Capital Markets.

Maybe just following up on the expense question. When you look across the portfolio, are you still seeing cost savings opportunities out there given all the streamlining that's already been done since COVID? And then just on the insurance side, aside from the rate increases, has your coverage changed in any kind of meaningful way?

So on your first question, Aryeh, the effort to be more efficient is continuous. I've been in the business in the hotel business since 1984. And over the course of that lengthy period, we've continued to find efficiencies every year within our portfolio. And I think the industry generally has as well. We operate these properties with far fewer people today than we did 10 years ago and way, way fewer than 15 or 20 years ago. And we think that's going to continue as technology continues to develop as the industry begins to adopt uses that come out from AI. See I got that in there, AI, AI, AI. But we do think there's opportunities in a number of areas. And yes, it's a continuous effort within the portfolio. Curator, which has 100 hotels today has over 100 vendor partner agreements, master service agreements, which have also helped to bring down our costs in our portfolio by millions and millions of dollars on an annual basis. They continue to pursue additional contracts, reducing costs on a per unit basis. New technologies, the Curator team reviews new technologies almost on a daily basis. Many of them are geared to reducing costs. We see a lot of technologies related to reducing energy costs over the long term. Water usage in particular, is seeing a lot of focus within the technology industry. And we'll see adoption of that over time as those become more widespread and available. So we do think efficiencies are going to continue. And again, if you go back and look historically at our margins at the LaSalle margins all the way back to the late 1990s, what you'll see is gradual improvement in those margins over the long time. And obviously, they're cyclical, they go up and down, and we tend to get more costs eliminated when things are difficult. And I would say we're still in an environment which has its challenges, because of inflation. So we continue to focus on reducing costs.

And then, Aryeh, on the second part of your question on the insurance coverage. We have the same amount of overall property coverage today than we did last year. So it's $500 million, which takes a lot of storms and different events. Here and there, we'll have the higher deductibles at some different parts of the layers of the insurance structure. It looks like it's a quote of different programs that are in there. But overall, with the same amount of coverage that we did before. So I think that speaks to the benefit we had is compared to if you're a smaller owner operator with the relationships on the insurance carrier side, when push comes to shop in markets like this, the carriers that you have relationships with, they'll stick with you. So we're able to maintain those levels of coverage, probably more than if you are a smaller owner or didn't have the long-term relationships that we had. But look, overall, insurance market, it goes up and down. The property market is tough. The GL market is better. Cyber has gone a little better. So there's varying phases. Right now, we're going through a rough patch here in the property side. But as history has showed, we go through a period where there's less storms and then it comes back down because a lot more carriers will come back to the space.

The next question is coming from Smedes Rose of Citi.

So Jon, in addition to AI, you need to be able to work in [ Ozempic ] in your remarks.

Wait, you're talking about corporately not personally, right?

I think he's saying something.

All right. Operator, can we move to the next. No, I'm just kidding. Go ahead, Smedes.

I just -- I wanted to just ask you a little bit about kind of what you're seeing on the transaction market. It looks like you have 2 more properties on the market and certainly in the media, there's been more than that, that have been sort of popping up. But just we've all seen what's happened with interest rates and just kind of curious if it's still deals under $100 million or easier to get done? Or kind of what are you sort of seeing in terms of the ability to transact in this market?

Smedes, it's Tom. That's obviously a great question. I think it continues to be kind of a bifurcated market in terms of those assets that have cash flows and then those assets, for example, like the ones we're selling maybe in those assets that are in recovery markets. So I would say, overall, the transaction market is pretty challenging. I would say that the deals and the things that we're selling, obviously, the things that are trading are below $100 million, that continues to be the trend. I think deals are taking longer. I would tell you that at the end of the day, our perspective is there's a lot of strong interest. We're seeing a lot of interest. We're just trying to translate that into conviction, in terms of the investors given the effect of the macro market. So I think that there's still some headwinds there. I think the higher for longer narrative from the Fed is not necessarily helping on the financing side. But you will see some deals that with high cash flow, the CMBS market is open, you'll see some deals north of $100 million that will trade. But again, they have some, again, high cash flow, et cetera. I do think that in some of these recovery markets, we're transitioning not necessarily from a return basis, but we're looking -- the investors are looking at a price per key and they're looking at it from the perspective of if they believe in a market, they want to get in early in a cycle because the price per key is compelling, especially relative to replacement cost and also given the backdrop of very limited supply in a number of these markets moving forward.

The next question is coming from Duane Pfennigwerth of Evercore ISI.

I wonder just to follow up, if you could talk a little bit about your outlook for asset sales into 2024. Of course, it will depend upon the environment and depend upon conditions. But like in your ideal optimal scenario, how many assets would we be talking about? And how would you be thinking about shaping the portfolio?

Yes. So from a strategic perspective, I think it will -- ideally, it's going to be -- depends what happens with the trading of our stock and the relative value opportunity between the public market and the private market. I think we've said before, we were asked how many of your 47 properties would you sell given the arbitrage opportunity to take advantage of it, and I think I've said 47. So we wouldn't sit here and say we have a sales target for next year of 5 properties and $300 million or anything like that. We don't really work that way. We don't need to sell any of these properties. We feel like we've transitioned the portfolio to a more favorable leisure business mix as I talked about. So it's really going to be opportunistic, and that will be driven by not just the overall macro. Obviously, it will be driven by the debt markets. It will be driven by what the view of investors is related to the future of both of those. But I think where we see the opportunity for fairly significant value improvement is as interest rates come down, we get past this macro view, we have an environment, as we've said in our markets, cities, resort markets, probably 4 years to 5 years of very, very nominal supply growth. And that's going to lead -- assuming we have a good macro environment, it's going to lead to pretty strong RevPAR growth. And that will ultimately get built into buyers underwriting fairly early on as we start to see an acceleration in the growth rate of RevPAR. So it's really going to depend upon how that market plays out, how the macro environment plays out and then the relative value opportunity between what we can sell for on any given day and where our stock is trading, the opportunity to buy that back and create value for the shareholders.

Thanks for those thoughts, Jon. And maybe just take a rifle shot on LaPlaya. When you think about the timing of getting that asset completely repositioned and completely renovated and launched, do you think you have enough time to catch the heart of the season in the first quarter? Or is it a little bit late and it would be more about kind of the second half of 2024.

Sure. Well, we're working really hard to catch the season. And there's an intense effort at the construction and project management level to get this project done and open. Of course, the one unknown continues to be how quickly we can get the county to respond. And I think we're down to 1 last permitting approval, though we'll have obviously continuous inspections. And there, you may lose days, but you're not going to lose weeks. Right now, we're losing weeks waiting on a permit. But I think from a ramp-up perspective, I mean, we've been trying to ramp up. We have a lot more money going into sales and marketing efforts. We have a pretty good group booking pace right now for the property. We have had to unfortunately move some business out of January that we can't accommodate without having the Beach House building. But going into the prime season of really President's Day on, we're starting to build a pretty good base. And the nice thing is we have a lot of people who want to come back to Naples, who're having common vacation there for a couple of years. And a lot of the business tends to be annual because they have family in the marketplace. So we're hoping we don't miss the season. We don't control everything as it relates to the reconstruction of that Beach House building, but we're getting pretty close now, and we're feeling better.

The next question is coming from Anthony Powell of Barclays.

Question on get cash flow for next year and the year after. In terms of your CapEx, where do you think your CapEx spend could go next year, given you finished up a lot of these projects and also the dividend. You got some NOLs this year, you have an impairment. So I'm curious if you have enough NOLs to maybe not pay a dividend next year even as RevPAR improves?

Sure. So on the CapEx, as you know, we talked about this where we're investing about $150 million this year to the property. We would expect in '24 that number should be $100 million or less. We just -- we haven't even started our budgeting process with our teams, and we'll go through that. But it should be substantially less next year and then trending at a low level for a number of years, but for if we ever decide to get approval on, say, Paradise Point in San Diego, for that conversion there. But overall, as we commented before, the major renovations of our portfolio have been made. Therefore, the amount of CapEx we're going to need going forward will be much less than what we've had the last couple of years. So we should assume that for '24 and beyond. And then regarding the dividend, yes, we still have an NOL that we could certainly burn through. And also as we make progress on sales, it's good for the cash and take advantage of the public private arbitrage on that. But as a result, for example, for Brazil, we -- the completion of that sale, we will incur a tax loss, which we can add into our NOLs. So for most likely, we would have -- don't have a need in '24 to increase the dividend to -- for taxable income purposes, we may choose to otherwise. But you should not assume that in '24, we have to increase the dividend. Beyond that, we'll have to see where the world plays out, what the macro is and additional sales that we complete.

The next question is coming from Michael Bellisario of Baird.

Jon, just on the top line, can you just walk us through the puts and takes compared to last year. I know there are a lot of moving pieces last year. You mentioned the convention calendars being stronger this year. But could you maybe remind us of the good and bad in both periods to kind of help us get a better feel for what the underlying kind of true run rate is in the fourth quarter?

So we had a -- we did have a couple of renovations last year that started, I think, November, December, which had a fairly mild amount of impact. I don't recall it being great. I mean, we can get back to you with what that number was. But I would think it was relatively small, $1 million to $2 million or something perhaps, perhaps might not even have been that much. So it's pretty clean on the revenue side. The expense side, the biggest negative impact is we had a nice true-up in property taxes of over $3 million in Q4 last year. And so that without any expected true-up this year in Q4, that will show an increase in quote expenses, if you will, for property taxes. Outside of that, I don't think there's any major item on the revenue side.

For last year, no, nothing that's notable. And we did comment about this earlier, but fourth quarter of this year in terms of the pluses here, very good convention calendar in San Francisco, it's about 4x what it was fourth quarter last year. San Diego, the convention center room nights are almost more than double than it was last year. And in Boston is also double what it was last year. The only market [ that -- and DC ] is also up. The only convention market that was down year-over-year is Chicago. So in the fourth quarter, we have -- what one of the reason why we have the group case going in is very favorable, and we're starting out. So those are the positives this year, less anomalies last year, at least on the revenue side.

And Mike, the one other thing is related to LaPlaya, which is not in our reporting numbers, but obviously, is in our numbers overall. I think LaPlaya was negative, slightly negative in Q4. and there was some impact in Key West and LaPlaya in Q4 this year should be $2 million to $3 million positive.

Got it. That's helpful. And then just sort of along the same lines, just on 4Q because last year, you had a big shortfall on the bottom line. Maybe we're all just on our side, bad at modeling 4Q this year. But there's been a lot of portfolio changes. Is it just post-pandemic changes in demand patterns? Or is there something else going on in the fourth quarter that's causing profitability to be lower than we sort of all remember it to be?

Well, the thing that happens in Q1 and Q4 is when you lose volume, obviously, your fixed costs are still there. And so it tends to have a worse flow compared to more normal volumes pre-pandemic. And so there tends to be less ability to absorb that shortfall in 1 and 4, whereas in [ Q1 and Q2 ], you have a lot more volume, you have a lot more occupancy, you've got higher rates in those quarters, and it's a little easier to absorb that flow, that shortfall from pre-pandemic in volume than you can in 1 and 4. I don't think it has much to do with the change in the portfolio on an overall basis.

Yes. And Mike, also just to remind again on the energy, property taxes and property insurance, those 3 items alone caused about 160 basis point impact to margins in the quarter, which was not in fact, from last year, and that's harder to forecast. That's not related necessarily to hotel operating, operations. So the good news is there's less pressure on the labor side. So that's less of a headwind there than it has been. But these 3 items that -- these are items that were not in play last year. We didn't have property insurance increases going up 50%, 60% last year. And then as Jon noted, some of the unusual timing of property taxes and we know what's going on energy market. So those 3 items have a big component of it. If you look at our guide of down 100 basis points plus, -- it reflects a 100 basis points headwinds from those 3 items.

The next question is coming from Gregory Miller of Truist Securities.

This question is about your 2 W Hotels. As Marriott is nearing completion of W renovation in New York's Union Square and to my understanding, using the hotel as a flagship for the new direction of the brand. Do you anticipate any major operating changes or any forest renovations to your Boston or Los Angeles properties to meet new brand standards.

No.

Okay. I can't argue with that. And then just since others are asking a second question, last one as well. This one is about the so-called hidden fees. Have you noticed any changes to booking trends for hotels that are already presenting the total hotel charge early in the booking process relative to hotels and alternative accommodations in the same market that have yet to present total hotel charges?

That's a really good question, Greg. And the answer is, we haven't seen anything anecdotally. It's probably a better question for Marriott, since they've been the one who've completely switched over and have some time period now to do some data measurement to see whether they're losing share or not. We've not seen it with our Marriott's. But I can't tell you we've dug into the detail into minutia to see if there's been change in share within our Marriott properties, what might it be related to. So I mean, obviously, the whole industry is going to go there. We as an industry at the association level, which includes owners, operators and the brands are supporting legislation that does incorporate all charges interestingly except government charges into the upfront -- into the upfront rate, and that's the way searches would occur. But that would apply across all kinds of lodging accommodations and that's really been the focus of the industry to make sure it's a level playing field. I think we have -- and the thing that we've seen, and I think it's been helpful and we'll really over -- we'll eliminate any long-term impact is the weather, you call it a destination fee or a resort fee or an urban amenity fee, it's been adopted by most properties within the urban and resort markets. And certainly, the major cities have adopted it. So I don't think from a competitive standpoint, ultimately, it's going to make a difference. By the nature of your question, certainly possible, it could make some minor difference in the near term where there were not everybody is doing it. But I think in the short -- in short order over the next 12 months, I think you'll probably see it adopted everywhere. And it's already required in California. It will be required for next year, I forget whether when in the year kicks in, but I think it's pretty early.

Yes. Yes, I was thinking about that one as well. I appreciate it, Jon.

Our final question today is coming from Chris Darling of Green Street.

Jon, going back to the discussion around dispositions, Boston and Washington, D.C. stand out to me as markets where you've kept your portfolio fairly intact since COVID at least. Maybe I'm reading too much into it, but just curious to understand how you're thinking about the long-term prospects for those cities relative to some of the other urban markets where you've sold out of.

Yes. I mean I think of those 2 markets, we probably feel better from a long-term perspective about Boston than we do about D.C. We just think D.C. will take -- D.C. is more of the same -- some of the same issues that the West Coast cities have, whereas Boston for a number of reasons, doesn't really seem to have those in a significant way. We also -- we like the fact that most people have gone back to work in Boston. And in D.C., for whatever reason the federal government can seem get people to come back to the office. So it's just going to take longer in D.C. I would also say our -- the other way to think about it is, look we have a pretty small position in D.C. today. We sold quite a number of properties when we bought LaSalle out of that market. So -- and we were never a big investor in D.C. at Pebblebrook. So we're going to carry a much smaller position in D.C. in all likelihood anyway than what we carry in Boston, which, while maybe the number of properties are similar, the sizes are quite dramatically different as are the EBITDA numbers. So we're big fans of Boston. We're big fans of San Diego and L.A. We believe in San Francisco, but we've been reducing our position there. And there are some other markets, obviously, that we've been reducing our position.

Okay. That's helpful. And then just one quick one, related to the entertainment strikes in Los Angeles. Historically, when you've seen those strikes come to an end, how quickly does business pick back up?

It depends on the time of year. So there are quite a number of productions that are just -- they would start the next day, the studios and the production companies have their plans in place. But the deeper we get into the fourth quarter, the entertainment industry tends to shut down a good bit between Thanksgiving and the second week in January just through its culture. And so whether they buck that trend and do a lot more than they normally do to get things done or in the work so they can have a season in the spring next year. Not sure. I don't have enough insight into that. But historically, they're pretty anxious to get those productions going. It's just if this runs much further and deeper into November, I'm not sure we're going to see a whole lot get done in the last 4 to 6 weeks of the quarter.

Thank you. At this time, I'd like to turn the floor back over to Mr. Bortz for [ closing comments ].

Well, thanks, everybody for participating. And hats off to [ Jimmy Buffett ]. I'm sure he's having a Cheeseburger in Paradise somewhere right now. We'll talk to you next year.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation. This concludes today's event. You may disconnect your lines or log-off the webcast at this time, and enjoy the rest of your day.