Good day, and welcome to PFG's Fiscal Year Q1 2026 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the call over to Bill Marshall, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations for PFG. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, and good morning. We're here with George Holm, PFG's CEO; Patrick Hatcher, PFG's CFO; and Scott McPherson, PFG's COO. We issued a press release this morning regarding our 2026 fiscal first quarter results, which can be found in the Investor Relations section of our website at pfgc.com. During our call today, unless otherwise stated, we are comparing results to the results in the same period in fiscal 2025. Any reference to 2025, 2026 or specific quarters refers to our fiscal calendar unless otherwise stated. The results discussed on this call will include GAAP and non-GAAP results adjusted for certain items. The reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the corresponding GAAP measures can be found at the back of the earnings release. Our remarks on this call and in the earnings release contain forward-looking statements and projections of future results. Please review the cautionary forward-looking statements section in today's earnings release and our SEC filings for various factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements and projections. With that, I'd now like to turn the call over to George.

Thanks, Bill. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining our call today. Performance Food Group is off to a great start in fiscal 2026, building upon the momentum when we saw exiting 2025. All three of our operating segments are contributing nicely to our profit performance, and we are seeing a nice combination of revenue performance and margin expansion. This morning, Scott, Patrick, and I will share an update on our company's progress and provide our thoughts on the industry and external environment. We finished our first quarter with excellent results, including double-digit top line growth, acceleration in our independent restaurant case volume and gross margin expansion. Our diversified approach to the food-away-from-home market continues to pay off as we are seeing broad-based market share gains. Our success is a direct result of our team's ability to execute in the current market environment. Within our Foodservice business, independent case growth exceeded 6%, propelled by market share wins and increases in customer penetration. We have continued to see case performance in our independent business gain momentum since early in the calendar year. Also, during the final weeks of the quarter, Core-Mark began shipping to Love's Travel Stops. The first of two large new account wins that we are onboarding in the Convenience space during the fiscal year. Scott will share more details on our progress in the Convenience segment in a moment. Our Specialty segment continues to navigate the economic backdrop by driving efficiencies through the business leading to double-digit adjusted EBITDA growth in the quarter. We are seeing pockets of strength in our Specialty business, including vending, office coffee, campus, retail and e-commerce fulfillment channels. Our teams are capitalizing on our PFG 1 approach, which encourages collaboration across our business segments to drive revenue and profit growth. We believe we are in the early stages of this initiative, but have already begun to see the benefits due to market share wins, sales growth and margin expansion. We are investing in our people and technology to support our growth profile. In the first quarter, our Foodservice salesforce head count increased about 6% compared to the prior year. We are committed to adding talented salesforce head count. The slight deceleration from the fourth quarter to the first quarter was due to normal fluctuation in hiring across the organization. We continue to attract high-caliber sales associates and believe this will be an important contributor to our growth in the years ahead. Before turning it over to Scott, who will provide more detail on our results. I'd like to reinforce how pleased I am with our organization and the efforts from our 43,000 associates. Their hard work and dedication directly reflect our company's success. Our diversified structure across the entire food-away-from-home market is well designed to succeed, and I'm excited for the future with PFG. With that, I'll turn it over to Scott. Scott?

Thank you, George, and good morning, everyone. Let's jump in and review some highlights of our first quarter results. As George mentioned, we are very pleased with our start to the fiscal year and are seeing contribution across the organization due to our team's solid execution. Starting with Foodservice, the segment built upon its momentum by accelerating independent case growth compared to Q4 and maintaining chain case growth in the low single digits. Total Foodservice cases were up 15.6% in the quarter, including incremental sales from Cheney Brothers, which we began lapping in early October. On an organic basis, Foodservice cases grew 5.1%, fueled by 6.3% organic independent case growth. Our independent case growth was driven by a 5.8% increase in new customers year-over-year and an increase in customer penetration. We were encouraged to see our lines for drop increase in the quarter, which is a key driver of long-term profitability. Our chain business grew cases 4.4% in the quarter as we continue to benefit from new account wins that were onboarded last year. Our pipeline of potential new chain business remains robust. In total, sales for our Foodservice segment increased 18.8% in the quarter, with organic top line growth increasing 7.7%. Shifting to margins, positive mix shift, low single-digit inflation and procurement efficiencies drove gross margin expansion. Cost inflation during the first quarter was 2.5%, roughly in line with the fourth quarter and a modest deceleration from what we experienced over the full year of fiscal 2025. Double-digit inflation in beef was largely offset by lower poultry and cheese prices in the period. Taking a look back at the quarter, the balance of growth, margin expansion and operational execution led to very strong segment adjusted EBITDA growth of 18.1%. Excluding the contribution from Cheney Brothers, our Foodservice segment adjusted…

Thank you, Scott, and good morning. Today, I will review our financial results from our first quarter, provide color on our financial position. I'll review our updated guidance for 2026. To echo both George and Scott, we are very pleased with our start to fiscal 2026, which helped us maintain our solid financial position. In the quarter, we achieved net sales above the top end of our guidance range we announced in August and adjusted EBITDA at the upper end of the guidance range. As a result of the strong performance, we are raising our sales guidance for the full year and reiterating our adjusted EBITDA targets, which we have a high degree of confidence in. We also remain on track to achieve the 3-year sales and adjusted EBITDA targets announced at our Investor Day in May. Before I give more details on our outlook, let me highlight our financial results for the quarter. PFG's total net sales grew 10.8% in the first quarter due to strong underlying trends in our three operating segments and the addition of Cheney Brothers. As a reminder, we started lapping the José Santiago acquisition at the beginning of the first quarter and closed on the Cheney Brother acquisition in the second week of October last year. This means that Cheney will be organic for 12 of the 13 weeks of the second quarter. Total company cost inflation was about 4.4% for the quarter, which is slightly higher than what we experienced in the prior quarter. Foodservice inflation of 2.5% was in line with the prior quarter and roughly in line with our model. While certain commodities have been volatile, headline inflation in the Foodservice space remains in the low single digits, which we view as a normal level for our business. Specialty segment cost…

[Operator Instructions] We'll take our first question from Mark Carden with UBS.

So, to start, you guys posted another quarter of solid top line results against what's been a pretty uneven backdrop in the restaurant channel. Just curious, how did your independent case growth progress by month? How is it trending quarter-to-date? And then related, is it simply the strength that you've seen to date that led you to bring up the top of your guidance? Or are you any more optimistic about the go-forward as well?

Well, we saw consistent growth through Q1. We had a very strong October. The last few weeks, kind of since, the shutdown, we've seen a little softening. And as far as our confidence to raise it, we have some additional new business coming in primarily in the Convenience area. We've got some business in the national count within our Foodservice area that we thought we had kind of over the hump to come with us and they want to sit on the fence until it's determined what happens in our clean room. But you add all that together, and we have real good confidence in bringing up that annual sales growth number.

Got it. That's helpful. And then, you talked about the slight deceleration on sales force hiring, but it seems to be in line with normalized fluctuations. Just curious, does the heavy commission focus that you guys have ever make it any more difficult to attract talent if the environment remains challenging over an extended period of time? Any impacts from just any uncertainty related to U.S. or what you're seeing with Cisco having passed through some of the hiring challenges in the past?

Well, first off, I'd say that I think our commission structure has been a great tool to attract great talent and people that want to grow their business. When I think about the hiring pace, we came out of last quarter at 8.8%. That's pretty rich. We feel really comfortable in that 6% to 8% range. This quarter, we were at 6%. So, if you look at the two-quarter stack being at 7.5%, we feel really good about that hiring pace. The other thing I'd say is if you just look at how we're structured from a decentralized state, we really rely on our OpCo presidents to make those hiring decisions. And George and I don't go out there and say, you've got to hire at a pace of 6% or 7% or 8%. We really let those folks make those decisions. Clearly, they're finding great talent on the street, and we've been able to continue to hire at that pace in that 6% to 8% range.

I would also add that we're very committed to having a commissioned sales force. But we also have a structure in place where we compensate them above the commission for a period of time, to make sure that we keep good people. And once we realize that someone's talented that they'll put in the effort, that they're committed to getting on commission, then we become very patient people.

Our next question comes from Alex Slagle with Jefferies.

You talked about some of the big chain business wins in Convenience. I imagine that remains a big needle mover there. But just kind of curious if you could fill us in on progress you're making, some of the smaller chains and independents just in terms of sort of winning new accounts and finding ways to accelerate the penetration of the Foodservice programs to those customers and how we should kind of think about that through the course of the year?

Yes, Alex. When I think about Convenience in particular, we're really happy with what they've done from a growth standpoint. And we're specifically talking about those two big accounts just because they're sizable. But our Convenience segment has done a great job picking up regional accounts as well. And I think through Service, everything you hear in the Convenience industry did today, we just returned from the big Convenience show, and there's so much focus on Foodservice. And if you look across the Convenience landscape, the chains and the customers that are performing well are the ones that are deeply ingrained in Foodservices. So, we think that's a huge competitive advantage for us. We think that was a prevailing reason in us getting some of these big and regional chain wins, and we expect that to continue.

Got it. And then, on the guidance. Can you ballpark interest expense and depreciation at all just to help us calibrate our models. It seems like these were a bit higher than I expected in the quarter, but any help there would be appreciated.

Yes, Alex, I'll take that. I mean, what I would do is take this quarter and use that as a strong run rate. I mean again, we continue to invest in the business. So, we've added some new buildings that are increasing depreciation. We continue to add fleet, but continues to increase deflation. And obviously, as you saw in the quarter, we invested a lot in inventory. So, maybe a little more borrowing than normal, but that should come down a slight bit. But I think if you take this quarter as a run rate, that will be a good indicator of the future quarters.

We will move next with Edward Kelly with Wells Fargo.

I wanted to dig in on the Foodservice EBITDA growth for the quarter. If you look at EBITDA growth relative to revenue growth, they were a bit more similar, which is not typically the case for you. It seems like OpEx per case was a little high. I'm just kind of curious as to what's happened with the OpEx side of the business within Foodservice that maybe prevented you from delivering a little bit better organic EBITDA growth in the quarter. And how we should think about that relationship moving forward the rest of this year?

Yes. Ed, we've invested a good bit in brick-and-mortar for one. And in these new distribution centers, you tend not to be as efficient in the early going. And obviously, you got a little bit more expense. We've had higher expense in our acquisitions, particularly in Florida, because we're investing, and we're investing heavily, and we're doing that during their slow time of the year. We're just so satisfied with these acquisitions and with the talent that we received, we're going to make sure they have the capacity available. We also are in the midst of a big freezer addition at our Jose Santiago building. With that, I'll turn it to Patrick too, to see if you have some other comments.

Yes. Just to touch a little bit more on that, Ed. One, again, if you look at all three segments, actually, we saw a really nice OpEx leverage organically, specifically to Foodservice, George already mentioned. If you take out Cheney, there was OpEx leverage. Cheney, just again, it's their slowest quarter. It's similar to Foodservices Q3. So they reduced some leverage there. And then as George mentioned, we're taking on some additional expenses. But those are really the reasons why you saw that this quarter.

Okay. Great. And then, I wanted to follow up on a response that you made on independent case volume momentum. October seemed good, especially at the start, but I think your compare was easier maybe with weather. It sounds like recently, there's been a little bit of slowing there. Could you just talk a bit specifically about independent case momentum for the industry, what you're seeing there in terms of like real time, I guess? And then, how are you feeling about sustaining a 6% or a better rate in Q2?

Ed, this is Scott. So, I think you hit it as we came out of Q1 and started into Q2. It continued to be strong over the first few weeks. But then we did have a little bit of choppiness over the last few weeks when we think about kind of lapping some of the weather from last year. So, it's a little tough to get a read on it right now. I wouldn't set a target for this quarter as far as independent case growth. Well, I would say is, we still feel good about the full year targeting 6%. And what's really driving that for us is just our independent account wins. As we mentioned, those are up 5.8%, and that's really what's driving our case growth.

Our next question comes from John Heinbockel with Guggenheim.

Can you guys parse out the 5.8%, that's a net growth in new accounts. When we think about sort of the gross wins, I don't think you've ever had real elevated losses, but the wins, the losses. How does that kind of shake out? Or how has it shaken out here? And then, you talked about the lines per drop. We were waiting for a long time, right, for penetration to pick up. Is it possible we're at the early stages of that and what may be driving that?

John, this is Scott. First off, I would say we don't call out a gross number. So you're right, the 5.8% is net. I would say that our customer churn hasn't really changed materially. So, we feel that our reps are out there doing a great job retaining customers, and really happy with the 5.8%. The penetration now has been a couple of quarters. So we're really optimistic about that. If the macro gets better, that really positions us exceptionally well. And so, that's something we're focused on. And for us, I think the differentiator out there has been our area managers. It's been our folks that are in front of our customers, working with them every day, growing those lines for drop, and that's been critical.

Yes. What I'd like to add, John, this is George. We continue to see SKUs grow faster than our penetration number into independent customers. So that tells me that they're probably in aggregate, running same-store sales declines still. And as far as lost business, we spent a lot of years working hard to get that number to single digit. And it's a rare month that we don't come in with single-digit loss in accounts. And I think when you look at the percentage of accounts that don't make it in our difficult industry, I think, we're doing a good job of making sure we don't lose accounts. So we always, and I mean always, have a nice spread between our lost business and our new business.

And then maybe as a follow-up. I know you guys have targeted the $100 million to $125 million of COGS savings. Just remind us maybe the cadence of that. I don't think it was quite linear. And then, when you look longer term, right, is there still, because you guys have now right been breaking out segment margins. And I know customized is a drag. But when you think about the opportunity beyond the next 3 years, would still seem fairly substantial, correct?

Well, John, on the COGS savings, yes, at Investor Day, we laid it out. And I think the way to think about it is just, we always are doing work here. So this wasn't something new. I've given you guys a target was maybe something we haven't done in the past. But, we look at that as being pretty evenly spread over the 3 years, and each year pretty evenly spread over the quarters. We're actively working on those savings, and we're seeing some good opportunities out there.

We will move next with Kelly Bania with BMO Capital.

I wanted to just follow up on the Specialty segment. The profitability was quite strong there despite what seems like a pretty still soft candy snack consumer backdrop. So, just curious if you can add more color on what drove your ability to achieve that? How much more that could continue if that backdrop remains soft there?

Yes. I mean, we've made real good progress with most of the channels. If you look at the margin aspect, our theater business has been down fairly substantially. A couple of account losses plus the theater industry is not very robust at this point. That is our lowest margin business that we have within our Specialty business. And then, the value area has also been slow, and that is our lowest gross profit per case. So, our improvement is somewhat expense control, but it's also really led by just a change in mix of business, which has been a real positive for us. And as Scott mentioned, we've got a real good sales fund when we've got some nice business coming in the back half of the year. So, we're feeling really good with Specialty. Now, if you look at inflation and you look at pre-COVID and you look at today, candy and snacks are way up close to the top as far as price increases. And it may appear that those are very discretionary purchases and not real price sensitive, but that's not the case. The big consumer of those products is very price sensitive. And they just got to get used to higher prices, and I think we'll see some comeback in that. When you look at the things that our Specialty area has been up against, they're doing exceptionally well.

That's very helpful. Also just wanted to ask, it seems like a growing number of complaints regarding the state of the consumer, particularly with younger consumers. And just curious if you could talk a little bit more about if you would agree with that as you look at your kind of diverse channels and customers that you serve, if you see that and if there's anything that you are doing to kind of help that either with private label or other promotional activity with vendors that you're working on to help those end customers?

Kelly, this is Scott. Certainly, we've heard that same message around the younger generation consumer. I wouldn't say that we've seen that specifically in our business. If I look across our chain segments, I mean, obviously, QSR remains highly pressured. I think that low-income consumer continues to struggle. I think for the last year, you've seen some of these fast casual concepts, I'd call them the high flyers that we're seeing double-digit same-store comps. They've kind of come back or normalized. And we've also seen some others sprout up. And I think really, right now, what we're seeing is that value proposition is what's really making the day for concepts. If they've got a really good value proposition that resonates, they're seeing reasonable same-store sales comps. For us, I think you hit it right on the head. We're focused on brands. We think that, that's the best value we can bring to our customers. We've seen our brand share grow with independents and chains. And so that's been -- I wouldn't say it's a positive for us. We'd like to see more store traffic and a more robust consumer, but we feel like we're in a really good position.

Our next question comes from Lauren Silberman with Deutsche Bank.

I want to start, if you could just clarify, are you guys seeing disruption in your salesforce or the ability to track new customers, because of the news of the deal? Just trying to understand and how much is seasonality versus influx of new hires and what's going on there?

Well, we've just -- this is George. We just had a couple of large events, which we have at the same time of the year every year. One is what we call Circle of Excellence, where we honor our top salespeople and sales management with most of our OpCo presidents at that event. And then, we do a food-centric where it's more customer focused, and we have some large particularly independent customers from around the country come. And we have every Opco President that's present at that. And what I would say is that morale is extremely high, particularly with the sales force. The only negative being some national accounts, like I said, sitting on the fence. And we're consistent with our people or as transparent as we possibly can be. And I don't really think that we're experiencing disruption. It doesn't seem to affect our hiring right now. It hasn't had any negative impact on our turnover. And I'll turn it over to Scott. He's a little closer to it than I am, but that's why I see it right now.

No. I think I'm totally aligned with George's comments. We have -- we've seen great availability of reps on the street. Hiring at 6% versus last quarter at 8.8%, like I said earlier, that doesn't concern me at all. We kind of bounce back and forth between that range of 6% and 8%. There may have been a handful of reps here and there that took a pause, because they were waiting to see what happened. But I would say, overall, I think I just look at our results, our independent case growth, our new account growth, and that gives me great confidence that our Opco presidents and our area managers are focused on the right things, and we continue to grow share and grow our independent business.

Great. On the OpEx side, what seems like some incremental investments in Cheney, should we assume some pressure on that line over the next few quarters? Or is this the bigger investment in this quarter, a bit more onetime? I know there's some seasonality, but just trying to understand the magnitude and how that is based?

Yes, do you want me to...

Yes. I'll take it real quick. And then you can add to it. I think that the seasonality change will help a lot in Florida. We have also seen the international traveler and Canadian travelers just haven't shown up in Florida like they typically do. But I think a lot of this will alleviate itself as we get into season. And they're very, very focused company and a great morale there as well. And we just feel like it's just a company that's going to flourish. Go ahead, I'll turn it to you.

Yes. I'll just add a couple more things. One, as George mentioned, there's a little reduction in leverage in the first quarter. And again, they're 1 year in. And so we've been also doing a lot of integration, but the integration that happened early on is usually around IT, HR. So, sometimes that can add some additional expenses. But when I look at how they performed in the first quarter, it was very much in line with our expectations, and it's very similar to prior year. So, we do expect that as we go a little further out, we'll start to see the synergies. As we've said, we'll really see the bulk of the synergies at the end of year 2. But we're doing a lot of integration work as we speak. So, it should dissipate as we go through the year most importantly, is what George said, though, as we get out of -- into the high season, it will definitely help.

Great. Just a final follow-up. The independent sales growth that you're seeing in October, understand started strong, a little bit slower with the government shut down. We've heard a bit of a range in restaurant world. I guess, are you guys still running in the mid-single digits? It's just hard to understand what's going on with the magnitude of a step down, particularly for the independents.

Yes. We're still running in that mid-single-digit range. Like we said, we've seen some volatility as of late, but we're still running in that range.

Our next question comes from Jeff Bernstein with Barclays.

Thanks. This is [ Pratik ] on for Jeff. You've talked about taking share for a while now. And I believe you mentioned that some of the segments like QSR and fast casual have been a bit more challenged of late. So, just wanted to unpack where you're seeing strength, what particular segments of the industry. ?And are your share gains coming from your larger peers or smaller operators? Or is it all of the above?

Well, I'll start with the last comment. We don't have a good method of knowing where our share gains come from. We have a tool report that we use that shows how we did and how the rest of the market does. So, we don't really know how anybody specifically does. So, I don't know that we can really comment that, on that. But just to give you an idea where it's slower and where it's done better. the shutdown, of course, has affected our Virginia and Maryland company the most, and both of those were on extremely good growth rates going into that. Not much anywhere else. The international tourism, it's been the upper Midwest, where we've seen -- I mean, I'm sorry, the Upper New England area, where we've seen the total market slow. But actually, our companies there have been gaining significant share. So, it hasn't had much of an impact on us. And of course, Florida and then Vegas has been affected quite a bit, and we do very little business in Vegas so that hasn't had much impact. Where we've seen market slowness the most has been the Midwest, the upper Midwest. And we have markets there where we're negative to last year and gaining share, which is a really unusual situation for us. So that's how I would put it. But we don't want to overdo this. I mean, we're still running good independent growth. And if the -- I think, if we didn't have the shutdown and the slower business in a couple of markets, we would be just as we were in the first quarter.

That's very helpful. And then Patrick, on the inflation outlook, you reiterated your expectation for low to mid-single digits. Anything that would cause you concern and would maybe push that to the upper end of the range? I know you mentioned some of the Specialty and snacks items that are seeing high degrees of price increases. But anything else on the commodity side or other product lines that may kind of push that to the upper end of the range?

Yes, great question. Honestly, a lot of the candy price increases we've already seen those and other suppliers taking price. On the commodity side, so I would again just reiterate on Convenience, we expect them to be in that 6 plus range, mid-single digits, Specialty a little bit lower, but staying very consistent for the rest of the year. And Foodservice, as we mentioned, is in the low single digits, and we do expect that to continue lots of commodities. And as everyone knows, beef and pork has been pretty high lately and inflationary, but we also over-indexed in cheese, and that's been deflationary. Poultry has been deflationary. So, the way we look at it, we -- that market basket of commodities should keep us in that low single-digit range.

We will move next with Danilo Gargiulo with Bernstein.

I was wondering if you just take a step back and we look at your very long-term strategy. How do you plan to strengthen your ROIC? And what do you think is a realistic timeline for the ROIC to be increasing by mid-single digits. So what would be the key levers to that?

Yes. Good question. We obviously look at ROIC very closely, too. And as you know, we've recently made some larger acquisitions. We've also been, as George mentioned earlier, we're investing a lot into capital for buildings and fleet. And all those things are really surrounded by growth. So, we've given you, obviously, our projections on EBITDA growth for the year, and we continue to work very closely on driving higher growth on income as well as managing our capital. So I would say, over the balance of this year, we should see improvement in ROIC.

Okay. And then, I want to follow up on the comments that you made on the M&A pipeline remaining robust. And specifically, the evaluation of strategic M&A and in light of the potential synergies that you might be having with a business combination with U.S. food. I was wondering if you can help us understand a little bit better what will you need to see in the data or in the strategic evaluation for the decision to have a positive or maybe a negative outcome? So what are the puts and takes on that?

Yes. On that, the process is ongoing. We've disclosed what we're doing in terms of the clean room. We really don't have an update to share at this time and just would ask that we keep our questions focused on our Q1 results and guidance.

Just adding on to the M&A pipeline. We talked about that. We're very active in the market. We talked about a small acquisition in our Convenience segment. And George and I continue to talk to a number of different people about opportunities primarily in the Foodservice space, but also across our other segments, we're always looking at opportunities. So, I still feel like that pipeline is robust.

And then focusing on the more near term. You mentioned the kind of market fluctuations that you're witnessing as we are in the overall restaurant segment. So, I'm wondering if there are any actions that you might be exploring in the near term to increase the capture rate of independent cases therein the better near term without necessarily compromising the quality of power, which has been extremely strong over the past few years?

Well, I would say, first off, philosophically on the street, we're decentralized. We let our OpCo presidents really drive their market area. And we're really happy with how we prepared our area managers from a training standpoint. I mentioned earlier, I think brands has been our calling card and is a big driver for us, especially in an environment where cost of goods is critical and menu pricing is critical. But I don't see anything philosophically that we're going to change materially in our approach. We believe in the partnership with our customer, and we believe in the strength of our area managers on the street.

[Operator Instructions] We will move next with Karen Holthouse with Citi.

A couple kind of more on the C-store side of things. Thanks for the guidance for mid-single-digit inflation. And I can appreciate that your suppliers are domestic. Have your conversations with them that are getting you to mid-single-digit number contemplated how tariff -- tariff-related inflation and more of like the packaging side of things might ultimately impact that number?

Yes. I think if I understand the question right, I mean, we talked about cost of goods being domestically sourced and not having a big impact there. But to your point, I think there are other inputs that could cause inflation, whether it's packaging, and for us, when we look at the broader picture of inflation, it's not as much cost of goods, it's probably share of wallet. And as we see consumers be pressured, whether it's other SNAP benefits going away or other things that are happening in the market that affect discretionary income, that definitely could have impacts. But to this point, we haven't seen anything material.

Okay. And then is there anything to consider as you're starting to onboard Love's and RaceWay (sic) [ RaceTrac ] in terms of margin profile of those businesses versus the existing business?

So first off, I would say the Love's piece, I do want to just take this opportunity to shout out to our Convenience segment. They onboarded over 600 Love's locations in September in the last couple of weeks. I did just an incredible job, including opening a new facility to help accommodate that. And it's actually RaceTrac. They are also the master -- they're the owner of the franchise RaceWay. So, you were right there, RaceTrac, we rolled out in December. So again, preparing for that, I feel like we're in a great position. And when I think about the margin profile, I would say it's consistent with the rest of our Convenience business.

And then one final one on Convenience margins. I think there was a comment in the prepared remarks about stronger performance in tobacco with growth of oral nicotine. Is that getting you to a point where like tobacco as a share of total Convenience sales is stable or even increasing?

No. I mean, I would say cigarettes, because of taxation are always the revenue driver. When you think from a margin standpoint, oral nicotine and the other alternative nicotines are really accretive to margin, but because of taxation, cigarettes are definitely a revenue driver.

We will take our last question from Peter Saleh with BTIG.

Great. I apologize if you guys covered this already. But just curious if you can comment, I know we've been seeing across the restaurant space that really casual dining has really been outperforming QSR and fast casual. And it seems like fast casual has really taken us a leg down in the most recent quarter or 2. Just curious if you guys can comment on if you're seeing the same thing within your customer base? And any thoughts on why the -- maybe why the customer shifted so much in the past couple of months?

Well, casual dining has been a big part of our business for many years, and we supply a lot of the large casual dining chains. And they're doing better versus the previous year in many instances, but they're doing much worse than they were doing in 2019. So, there's a little bit of the kind of bouncing off the bottom. I think there's some that have done some great marketing. They have their pricing to where their -- at least a similar value to fast casual with a higher touch with the customer. So, I think that's helping them. I don't know that there's a long-term change with what we're seeing today. Just got to watch it and see what happens, but I don't think there's a long-term change.

Thank you. And this concludes our Q&A session. I will now turn the call back to Bill Marshall for closing remarks.

Thank you for joining our call today. If you have any follow-up questions, please reach out to Investor Relations. .

Thank you. And this does conclude today's program. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at any time.