Good morning, and welcome everyone to the Provident Financial Services, Inc. Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to turn the call over to Adriano Duarte, Head and Investor Relations Officer. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Christophe. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for our fourth quarter earnings call. Today's presenters are President and CEO, Tony Labozzetta; and Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Tom Lyons. Before beginning their review of our financial results, we ask that you please take note of our standard caution as to any forward-looking statements that may be made during the course of today's call. Our full disclaimer is contained in last evening's earnings release, which has been posted to the Investor Relations page of our website, provident.bank. Now it's my pleasure to introduce Tony Labozzetta, who will offer his perspective on our fourth quarter. Tony?

Thank you, Adriano. Happy New Year, everyone, and welcome to the Provident Financial Services earnings call. The fourth quarter of 2024 was characterized by a more favorable macroeconomic environment with continued growth, additional interest rate cuts, improved performance in the banking sector and an optimistic outlook. The Provident team maintained solid core performance and profitability, thanks to the excellent asset quality, good deposit growth and the increasing contributions of our fee-based businesses. During the quarter, we reported net earnings of $48.5 million, or $0.37 per share. Our annualized adjusted return on average assets was 1.05%, and our adjusted return on average tangible equity was 15.39%. Our adjusted pretax pre-provision return on average assets was 1.53% for the fourth quarter. We are pleased with our core financial results and are confident in our ability to build on this momentum going into 2025. At the end of 2024, our capital levels remain healthy and comfortably exceeded levels deemed to be well capitalized. Normalizing for changes in AOCI, our tangible book value per share grew $0.34 to $14.71 and our tangible common equity ratio was consistent with the trailing quarter at 7.67%. As such, our Board of Directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $0.24 per share payable on February 28. During the quarter, our deposits grew $248 million or 5.4% annualized. The average cost of total deposits decreased 11 basis points to 2.25% and the average cost of interest-bearing deposits decreased 15 basis points. Our total cost of funds decreased 14 basis points to 2.48%, which remains favorable relative to our peer group. As a result, our core net interest margin expanded 4 basis points. However, our reported margin compressed 3 basis points to 3.28% due to a decrease in purchase accounting accretion. During the fourth quarter, our commercial lending team closed…

Thank you, Tony, and good morning, everyone. As Tony noted, we reported net income of $48.5 million or $0.37 per share for the quarter. Excluding charges related to our merger with Lakeland Bancorp, core earnings was $62.9 million in the current quarter or $0.48 per share with a core ROA of 1.05%. Further adjusting for the amortization of intangibles, our core return on average tangible equity was 15.39% for the quarter. Note that all merger-related charges have now been recognized with no further merger expense to be recorded in 2025. Excluding merger-related charges, pretax pre-provision earnings for the current quarter were $91.8 million or an annualized 1.53% of average assets. Revenue totaled $205.9 million for the quarter, and our core net interest margin increased 4 basis points from the trailing quarter to 2.85%. Including 43 basis points of purchase accounting accretion, our net interest margin was 3.28% for the fourth quarter. We currently project the NIM in the 3.35% to 3.45% range for 2025. Our projections include two additional 25 basis point rate reductions in September and December 2025. During the quarter, we reclassified $151.3 million of non-relationship equipment lease loans to held for sale. Excluding this transfer, period-end total loans were essentially flat for the quarter as growth in multifamily and commercial loans was largely offset by reductions in CRE, construction, residential and consumer loans. December closings were strong, however, and our pull-through adjusted loan pipeline at quarter end was $1 billion with a weighted average rate of 6.98% versus our current portfolio yield of 5.99%. Deposits increased $248 million or an annualized 5.4% from the trailing quarter to $18.6 billion at December 31, with growth driven by municipal and consumer noninterest-bearing and money market balances. As a result, our loan-to-deposit ratio decreased slightly to 101%. The average cost…

[Operator Instructions] And your first question comes from the line of Mark Fitzgibbon with Piper Sandler.

First question I had, Tom, I guess, I'm curious how you hit that $26 million fee projection in like the third and fourth quarter when insurance revenues declined seasonally. What -- what's kind of the offset there? I mean what are some of the other items that you anticipate being higher to mitigate that seasonal decline in insurance?

Yes, that's an average over the course of the year, Mark. So we're going to see seasonal improvement in the first half of 2025. In addition, there are some volatile items in there, as you know, regarding gains on loan sales, swap fee income, SBA loan sales --

Insurance contingency in the first quarter, which makes it higher than $26 million.

Right. And also BOLI death benefit claims, we don't model those, but there's an actuarial component to that where we see some recognition of income there. So overall, we expect the $26 million a quarter is a reasonable number.

So for the BOLI number, is it a normal run rate, excluding debt benefits sort of $2.3 billion? Is that the right number?

Is that on top of what we were -- I think so.

That's correct. Yes, this quarter it had none. So that's a typical run rate, Mark.

Yes.

Okay. Great. And then I guess your expense guide looks like it assumes some pretty heavy lifting. I guess what are some of the bigger pieces of that? Where do we have cost synergies coming? Is it residual stuff from the Lakeland deal? Or is there other things where you think you can sort of reduce expenses on?

Yes. I mean we kind of worked off of the beginning -- reported expense for this quarter, Mark, back after the nonrecurring items, and I mentioned a few of them in the comments, took into account the additional payroll -- employer payroll taxes in the first quarter, work through the full cost savings, which were realized at the end of Q4, so we took full benefit for that in Q1. We get to -- I'm getting about $113 million, $114 million for the first quarter. So the $112 million to $115 million guide seems reasonable. We'd expect to see that stabilize, maybe even trail off a little bit in the back half of the year.

Okay. And I think you said that you're assuming 225 basis point cuts and rates. What is each 25 basis point cut mean for NII or the margin?

To be honest, not a whole lot. The balance sheet is so neutral that we ran a number of scenarios, both with growth and different rate cut environment. And very tightly clustered in terms of NIM. And the difference in net interest income is almost a couple of million dollars up or down, a couple of hundred basis points even.

Okay. And lastly, Tony, I guess I'm curious, from your perspective, what are sort of the top 2 or 3 priorities for the company right now?

So to view no Provident -- we're pretty good at the risk management and our balance sheet is pretty strong. So as we move into 2025 and beyond this year, in no particular order, I would probably say the -- continuing to build on our culture and nurture the team dynamics of bringing 2 companies together. Our growth and growth is still going to be our biggest focus for this year in all sectors. I think some of the things that we're excited about is the changes that are happening in our commercial bank and treasury management and seeing some good dynamic growth there in deposits. Our fee-based businesses are still drawing. And lastly, I would say, huge focus about deepening share across the channels. That's big. And I think with the Lakeland merger being able to deploy some of that is also going to be very accretive for us. And we want to do this while -- I know you mentioned it while we're maintaining operational efficiencies. So that's really the focus for me and the team as we move into 2025.

And your next question comes from the line of Billy Young with RBC Capital Markets.

I guess, first, just kind of like a bigger picture question. Kind of looking at your adjusted returns for the quarter and your 2025 return targets, just kind of how do you think about -- how do you think those returns kind of stack against your longer-term franchise goals? Do you see room to kind of optimize and do better than that longer-term?

I think there's the continued ability to gain efficiencies and scale, which should continue to improve the returns metrics overall.

Yes. I would add to that, that we've done [indiscernible] a lot of effort this year in building the foundation for an organization that could be some good strong growth. We've done much, and I think we're prepared. And I think as we continue to build, we won't have to scale up at the same level, so we can take advantage of that. We've put some good dynamics for loan growth in this coming year. And we'll continue to look at areas to become even more efficient. So I think it's really growing our businesses and being able to handle the scale without adding to the operating expenses.

Got it. And then just switching to loan growth a little bit. I think we've spent the last couple of quarters talking about kind of improving activity and better customer sentiment hasn't really shown up in the bottom line numbers yet, but I kind of understand there's some moving parts this quarter. It feels like payoff activity was a little bit elevated this quarter. It's been a little bit of a headwind. Kind of, do you need to see that moderate a little bit to kind of get to your 5% growth target for 2025? Or -- what is it that gives you confidence that you'll get there?

Well, I think if you remember, last quarter, we gave a little bit of caution in that we might see some pre-prepayments, and we saw some of that. This quarter, we also had about 50% of the $328 million that I mentioned was just maturities or -- and loans and sale of the underlying property. So that's just something that you can't really gauge and about half was refinancing away from us. So the way I feel comfortable about it is we've made some good dynamic changes in our Commercial Bank. We have a good leadership team there that across all our segments that could really build our business. We're seeing activity. If the operating environment cooperates and the rate cycle, I think that we're going to really jump ahead, right? So there's -- those small headwinds that I mentioned, but we have the appropriate complement to be able to produce growth in excess of the numbers that we're guiding you guys on. And if -- just to give you a sense, the $712 million that we closed this quarter, we really need to be somewhere at the size of the bank that we are now between $24 billion and $25 billion, we need to be closer to about $800 million to $900 million of production. And then you take about 40% of that, and that's what really affects -- goes to your outstanding, that's sort of the algorithm or calculus that we do. And so we're able to see that the $712 million in this environment. So again, the only thing I would caution is the operating environment. In terms of Provident's capacity and having the right complement, the right leadership, the right go-to-market strategy, enhancing our treasury management, I'm pretty excited about that. And I think '25 is going to demonstrate that. But we've had some headwinds have changed. Obviously, John retired, our CLO, we've got new changes there. We see opportunities coming from even the legacy organizations as some of those change agents have come to us from. So, long-winded answer to say, I know it hasn't shown up in our results in the last couple of 3 quarters, but we're feeling pretty good about the foundation to build as we move forward.

Yes. If I could just add a couple of thoughts, Tony. I think our market position currently is very strong. I know some of our competitors have some other internal issues that they're dealing with. And so I think we have the ability to be a real dominant player over the next year. I think Tony referenced a little bit some of the distractions we saw with integration and core systems conversion, all of that's behind us now. So I think there's a full focus on moving forward. And then in Tony's prepared comments, he did reference Bill Fink joining us as Chief Lending Officer and some other ads on the revenue-producing side that we expect to see really generate some growth. So pretty optimistic.

Yes. So I would say one last thing. If you -- on that. We've been historically very strong on growing the CRE side of the business. If you look at the real underlying sort of silver lining in our commercial growth -- in our production is that most of the growth we've seen has come in the C&I space and our specialty lending businesses, which have done really well. If our creed, which I think we can amp up, we have some noise around pre this year. If we could amp up our creed to the traditional levels, which I think that's probably easier for us to do than the other side that we should achieve the numbers that we're guiding to and maybe overachieved.

And your next question comes from the line of Tim Switzer with KBW.

My first one is on kind of looking for a little bit more clarity on the expense outlook. It's kind of a wide range there. And you're talking about $113 million to $114 million for the first quarter, but then maybe trails down a little bit in the back half of the year. What would be driving that improvement later in '25? Is that like seasonality or some initiatives you have that would may be coming offline?

Yes. Typical seasonality, Tim, with the employer payroll tax thresholds being achieved and some of the utility maintenance kind of cost that you see in the colder months of the year being a little bit more elevated in the first quarter.

Okay. And what would maybe drive you, I guess, to the higher end of your range, if you're thinking $113 million, $114 million in Q1 and then down from there?

Only additional investments in terms of core operating expense, I mean, things that come that I consider to be outside of operations would be decisions made around resolutions of nonperforming assets as an example where you might take a loss that's not reflected in these core or projections.

Okay. And sorry if I missed this earlier, but is this quarter a good level for purchase accounting accretion going forward?

Yes, I think it's a good base, Tim. It's a little bit unpredictable because of the volatilities in the cash flows. I mean what happened to us this quarter is we saw fewer prepayments of loans that had acquisition discounts, and we actually saw some prepayments of loans that had acquisition premiums in the SBA book that was acquired. There's not a lot of premium loans left in there. It's about -- total of about $2.4 million, but that was about $800,000 of reduction in the current quarter.

Wow. Okay. And I think we've asked before. But are you guys considering securities -- just given the change in the yield curve and with some of your lower yielding assets, it seems like you could give you a nice earn back relative to click?

No, Tim. I think we continue to feel that it's appropriate to hold the assets. We don't see again, an inefficient market. We don't see the earn-back in a short enough time frame to warrant that. We did do the restructuring in connection with the acquisition of about $550 million at the Lakeland acquisition because there it made sense, the hit to equity was already baked in through the purchase accounting.

I might want to add that we're thinking about this thoroughly since we made the announcement on the leasing you might want to expand on that.

That's true. I mean, we did decide, as you saw in the earnings release, to exit the non-relationship portion of the equipment lease financing business. So I consider that a restructure. It's not a big spread business, and we think there's -- it's just not attractive from a building franchise point of view and better use of capital.

And your next question comes from the line of Feddie Strickland with Hovde Group.

I was wondering if you can update us on the opportunity with upcoming CD maturities and what you're seeing on repricing CDs today.

Yes. CDs repricing over the next 12 months total about $3 billion, $1.2 billion in the first quarter, about 57 basis points of pickup in the first quarter. When I talked about how neutral our balance sheet is, it's fun. If you look at floating rate loans, they're about $4.8 billion and the maturing CDs and borrowings are about $4.3 billion over the next 12-months.

And then the flexibility on the rest of the liability side of things.

We also have a slight repricing downward on some of the specialty pricing deposits for the non-CDs account.

Yes, that makes up the rest of the different from why I say that regardless of the rate environment, really the impact on the NIM is fairly minimal.

Got it. And then wanted to dig into fees really wealth in particular. Two questions on that. Number one, is there an opportunity to move that average fee higher from that 73 basis points or so. And then the second portion of that is do you see -- what are the opportunities to go to the non-advisory portions of the wealth business?

I don't think that there's a lot of ability to up the fee rate. The 73 is pretty strong relative to the industry and the peer group.

Exactly. I think the game for us in the just of the AUM and if we can keep the fee at that relative level, I think that will be the success in that space. The second part of that question was with -- is that the -- I didn't get the second part.

Could you repeat --

[Indiscernible] like just growing the non-advisory portions of the business?

Yes, I think that's been growing. For us, I think we -- this year, I think we did think $300-and-something million of new mostly outside bank growth in that business. It's not what I would call a material segment of our space, but it's a good contributor. And ultimately, I think I would love to see more graduation from that space and into as assets build and into more of our Beacon Wealth business. So having more of a synergy there. But ideally, I think from my perspective, I see the greatest promise for us is to continue to synergize across the channels and have our AUM growth on the Beacon side is going to be the greatest path for improved profitability.

Yes. I'm not sure if we understood. Feddie, let me just check the question. I think Tony was referring to the non-deposit investment products outside of Beacon, but I think you might have been asking about non-advisory services provided by Beacon. Is that correct, things like the tax state, that kind of?

That's correct. I was just wondering whether that, I guess the pie grows a little bit for those sections relative to the non-advisory -- relative to the advisory part of the business?

It does, but it's a relatively small portion. Really, the money at Beacon has made through the advisory services.

Got it. And just last question. I wanted to touch on credit. I know there's not a ton in terms of NPAs, but could you talk about potential opportunities to resolve some of the nonperforming loans over the course of 2025?

We continue to work with the customers. We look at node sales, see where they make sense. On the REO side, we're trying to work through a couple of resolutions on the remaining, I think it's about $9.6 million left in real estate owned. We expect to see some of that continue to move. We do a pretty good job of retaining those nonperforming assets for a relatively short period of time.

I think we have a good group in the resolution area, and they have good active strategies, so on the best path out for all the things that are moving into. So we're pretty comfortable, but things don't stay there forever, and it was a good exit strategy.

And our final question comes from the line of Manuel Navas with D.A. Davidson.

Can you speak a little bit more to the kind of the wild cards around the NIM range? What could get you to the top and what could get you to the bottom?

Really, the biggest driver is the shape of the curve so long as the longer end stays somewhat anchored on the 10-year side of things, especially, that's where we see a little bit of a pickup rates down versus rate up. Rates up is that we see more benefit to the wholesale funding cost and a little bit on deposits, but at deposits, you get to a level where I think the beta starts to drop more. But that's really the primary challenge there is just that the shape of the curve changes materially. The other thing would be the accretion, which has volatility and growth overall, right? We talked about last quarter, I believe, and we're going to continue to execute on that adding some to the securities portfolio. I'd like to see that get up to about 15% of assets. The spread on that is a little lower. So it could drive the NIM down a bit, but still give us greater net interest income.

That's great. You've been able to lower deposit costs pretty well. Is it -- is there any difference in the first 75 basis points versus December cut. And -- is that -- is there still going to be some deposit costs fell into the first quarter beyond CD repricing?

Yes. You'll see cuts that were effective January 1.

Okay. Any difference in the difficulty of those cuts or pushback?

No. When the initial cuts came through, the communication was pretty clear that there were going to be continued movements in line with the Fed for the most part. So I would expect --

A lot of the communications happened between the relationship managers and a lot of our customers. So not only did they inform about the rate cut, but they informed about prospective rate cuts and what the impacts would be. So -- it should -- since the stability is there, we haven't -- we're pretty comfortable that the clients are well informed and their behaviors. One of the things we saw this quarter, which wasn't clearly pointed out, we also saw some good consumer deposit flowing. Most of that growth happen in the consumer side, both non-interest bearing and interest bearing and also some municipal. So our business deposits were actually cycling down through the payments of bonuses taxes, et cetera, which we didn't see any account closures. So most of that will -- we expect to kind of recycle back in. So with the consumer activity coming back, which has been the outflows over the last -- since COVID, I think that, that is probably a good indication that, that flows in. And if our commercial deposits come back in, it should bode well for our growth as we move forward.

I appreciate that. Can you expand a little bit more on the -- just kind of shifting gears to the opportunity geographically? You brought up Pennsylvania and Westchester. Just could you add some more color on maybe sizing or timing of that opportunity?

Sure. In my spoken comments earlier, I mentioned that we had more complements to our current lending teams in our present markets. In addition to that, we've also expanded by having, I think, a 4-person team into Pennsylvania, and I think 2 more individuals into the Great Basin and Pennsylvania. And so that will help us grow the -- we have a sort of a more focused strategy in building out our Eastern Pennsylvania marketplace, which we have a good presence in. And I think those both will help us build that in tandem working with our retail side, we're looking at building not only the commercial, but the treasury management and deposits as well in that market. And then we've added some complements in the Westchester New York, now Westchester Pennsylvania to be able to build out some of the lending in that space. So we're pretty comfortable, and I think they'll think coming on board, perhaps I hope build out his team from folks that follow him. And it's a pretty exciting time. I know it's not showing up in the balance sheet just yet. But I'm pretty comfortable that we've set the foundation for good growth as we move forward.

That concludes our Q&A session. I will now turn the call back over to Anthony Labozzetta for closing remarks. Tony?

Well, I just wanted to say thank you to everyone, and appreciate the good questions this quarter. I'm pretty comfortable and optimistic for Provident's future. I wish you all a good 2025 and look forward to having conversations with you in the near future. Thank you.

This concludes the meeting. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect.