Thank you for standing by. And at this time, I would like to welcome everyone to today's Provident Financial Services Third Quarter Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to turn the call over to Adriano Duarte, Head of Investor Relations. Adriano?

Thank you, Greg. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us for our third quarter earnings call. Today's presenters are President and CEO, Tony Labozzetta and Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Tom Lyons. Before beginning the review of our financial results, we ask that you please take note of our standard caution as to any forward-looking statements that may be made during the course of today's call. Our full disclaimer is contained in last evening's earnings release, which has been posted to the Investor Relations page on our website, provident.bank. Now it's my pleasure to introduce Tony Labozzetta, who will offer his perspective on the third quarter. Tony?

Thank you, Adriano, and welcome, everyone, to the Provident Financial Services earnings call. I'm happy to share Provident's third quarter results today, which demonstrated continued strong performance and advancement on several strategic initiatives. Looking back over the past 12 months, we have made notable progress driving consistent and diversified growth, while also improving operational efficiency across our entire organization. Our hardworking team remains focused, contributing to our strong results by expanding our loan portfolio and pipeline broadening our deposit base and driving record revenues for the second consecutive quarter. During the quarter, we reported net earnings of approximately $72 million or $0.55 per share, which is consistent with the previous quarter. Our annualized return on average assets was 1.16% and our adjusted return on average tangible equity was 16.01%, while we are pleased with the bottom line metrics, we are even more energized by the meaningful improvement in pretax free provision revenues during the third quarter, which grew to a record of nearly $109 million. Our pretax pre-provision return on average assets of 1.76% has improved substantially compared to the 1.64% in the prior quarter and 1.48% for the same quarter last year. We believe this improvement serves as a good indicator that we have consistently enhanced the underlying profitability of our business, even as we have accelerated and diversified our loan growth. One of our primary areas of strategic focus continues to be deposits. And during the quarter, our deposits increased $388 million or an annualized rate of 8%. It is worth noting that this growth was primarily driven by core deposits, which increased $291 million or 7.5% annualized. We continue to remain focused on efficiently funding our strong commercial loan growth and have made investments in people and capabilities to support quality deposit growth over the intermediate term.…

Thank you, Tony, and good afternoon, everyone. As Tony noted, we reported net income of $72 million or $0.55 per share for the quarter, with a return on average assets of 1.16%. Adjusting for the amortization of intangibles, our core return on average tangible equity was 16.01% for the quarter. Pretax pre-provision earnings for the current quarter increased 9% over the trailing quarter to a record $109 million or an annualized 1.76% of average assets. Revenue increased to a record $222 million for the quarter, driven by record net interest income of $194 million and noninterest income of $27.4 million. Average earning assets increased by $163 million or an annualized 3% versus the trailing quarter, with the average yield on assets increasing 8 basis points to 5.76%. Our reported net interest margin increased 7 basis points versus the trailing quarter to 3.43%, while our core net interest margin increased 1 basis point. The company maintains a largely neutral interest rate risk position, but anticipates future benefits of the core margin from recent Fed rate cuts and expected steepening of the yield curve. We currently project the NIM in the 3.38% to 3.45% range in the fourth quarter. Our projections include another 25 basis point rate reduction in December of 2025. Period-end loan sales per investment increased $182 million or an annualized 4% for the quarter, driven by growth in mortgage warehouse and other commercial and multifamily loans, partially offset by reductions in construction and residential mortgage loans. Total commercial loans grew by an annualized 5% for the quarter. Our pull-through adjusted loan pipeline at quarter end was $1.7 billion. The pipeline rate of $6.15 is accretive relative to our current portfolio yield of 6.09%. Period-end deposits increased $388 million for the quarter or an annualized 8%, while average deposits increased…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question today comes from the line of Tim Switzer with KBW.

My first question is on the margin. I think you guys have -- I understand kind of the interest rate impacts on the floating rate book in your deposits there. But I think you guys also have quite a bit of loan back book repricing as well. Can you maybe update us on the quantity of loans that are fixed rate repricing over the next 12 months or so? And then what kind of uplift you would expect on the yields just at current rates?

I think, I can give it to you in pieces, Tim. The total repricing is just under $6 billion to $5.9 billion. Within that, the floating book is about $4.950 billion. So the balance is either longer-term adjustable repricing in the period or fixed rate.

Got you. And do you have kind of like what the blended yield is on that fixed rate and adjustable portion?

I do not. I know I mean the margin projection reflects all of that. So you can see the increase based on the expected new loan rates of 6.15% that's in the pipeline. But I don't have it at my fingertips the current portfolio rate for that piece of that segment.

Got you. Okay. And there's been some discussion on other conference calls about increasing loan competition on pricing. Could you maybe discuss what you've seen in your markets and then kind of dissect that between C&I and then the CRE market?

Sure. Yes. I think that's a fair statement that we've seen some increased competition in the lending market for sure, mostly on the CRE side with what the either the private space or insurance the agencies are doing. In fact, some of our -- we had about $348 million of payoffs this quarter. Some of that had to do with that. Some of it have to do with loans just selling. But on the C&I side, we're not seeing the same level of competition that we are on the CRE side. But I would say it's a fair statement to say overall, the competition has grown stronger. However, I would like to end that by saying that our team is still building a pipeline that's kind of record high at $2.9 billion. So in our pull-through, I say we're closing about 65% of the things we touch, so those are good consistent metrics for us. We're careful about what the economy looks like. We're doing good loans to good sponsors under good terms, but we're aware that there's some pricing competition or structure competition out there.

Got it. That's helpful. And if I could get 1 more follow-up. Could you maybe add some color on how some of your new specialty verticals like ABL and health care are contributing to the loan growth?

I think as we might have mentioned on the written prepared comments was -- this quarter, the C&I reflected most of our growth, which includes health care, maybe our warehouse lending did very well for us this quarter. In fact, those were all double-digit growth in some of those categories, where our CRE was relatively stable because of some of the prepayments, unanticipated prepayment we saw was in that class. So again, those are good. That's the areas that we are strategically focused on scaling up. We're doing it very well. We're very proud of that. We have the good teams to handle that. It's also driving a good result on our CRE concentration ratio, as I mentioned, so it's having all the strategic effects that we desire. If CRE kicks up, I think, this quarter, while I said that loans grew 5% the effective production would have been somewhere around 7%, 7-plus-percent if the prepayments were not there in the CRE space. So I'm pretty proud of the productivity this bank has right now. And our focus will continue on those verticals, which we put in place strategically. We expect them to be high single double-digit growth because the scale of that book is not substantial, so that all the productivity is going to be substantial. And while CRE will run in that 5% space.

Tim, the other thing I could add, if it helps with the projected loan mix is the pipeline breakdown. Commercial real estate represents about 42% of the pipeline. The specialty lending category, which includes the ABL and health care, you were referring to is about 14% there's 5% in resi and consumer and the balance is the other commercial loan categories, middle market and other commercial lending.

And our next question comes from the line of Feddie Strickland with Hovde.

Good afternoon, everybody. Just wanted to touch on noninterest income, the guide seems to imply about a $1 million step down linked quarter. Is that just an expectation of lower loan prepayment fees, plus maybe some seasonality on the insurance?

Yes, you got it, Feddie. It's maybe a little conservatism in there as well. But the prepayment fees, again, subject to some volatility. They were about $1.7 million this quarter. So we scaled that back, but who knows what we'll see. Personally, I'd rather hold the loan and leave the fees out. But yes, that -- and the seasonality in the fourth quarter is not necessarily the strongest for insurance. We see well going into Q4 too. Q1 is where we see the pickup, right?

And I guess, along the same lines of noninterest income. Can you talk about the opportunity on the wealth side as we enter '26 and whether you're working to bring on additional talent there?

Well, absolutely. As I mentioned on the call, we've hired Anna Vitelli. She's the Chief Growth Officer. She's building -- she's charged with growing and service and retainage of -- in a way of extraordinary service in that space and deeply integrating it with the bank. So we think there's a lot of great opportunity. So Anna will build out our needs, adding more sales and production staff and organizing ourself in a fashion that will give us the things that we're looking for. But certainly, these investments are aimed at 1, growing new AUM and deepening connections that we have within the organization already.

Got it. And just 1 more quick 1 for me on capital. Just hoping to get your updated thoughts on how do you think about capital and about deployment via dividends versus buybacks versus organic growth, while still managing the CRE concentration piece as well.

Yes. I think our first preference remains organic growth at profitable levels. And again, recognizing the strength of our pipeline, that's where our energy has been focused -- that said, we are at comfortable levels of capital there. We're close to $11.90, I think, on CET1 at the bank level. So there's opportunities for us there. We certainly think we're trading at an attractive price at this point. With regard to dividend, we kind of like to get back to a 40%-ish payout ratio, somewhere in the 40% to 45% range. So I think that's when we look at that more carefully. The other thing is we're in the middle of budget season here, which is why we didn't give a lot of forward guidance. We want to wait until January to give everybody a full year update. But that will help inform our capital decisions as well as we get more confidence around our asset growth and capital formation projections.

And our next question comes from the line of Dave Storms with Stonegate.

I appreciate you taking my questions. Just wanted to start with some of the decrease in deposit costs and maybe get your thoughts on how much more room there might be to run here and what that looks like from a competitive landscape?

Decrease in deposit costs. Well, we saw growth in noninterest-bearing, which was helpful to us. The overall cost of funds was only up 1 basis point to 2.44% this quarter. So there was a little bit of shift in mix. While deposit costs were up it was still at an attractive rate in terms of funding advantage relative to the wholesale borrowings. So that's really what we try to manage, obviously, is the overall cost of funds. That all said, we do have -- we had the Fed rate cut at the end of September, the 17th, I think it was -- and then this most recent 1 is yesterday, I guess. So we're going to see the benefit of that of both of those cuts in Q4. The September cut was effective on October 1, and the most recent cut will be effective November 1, in terms of beta overall, I think we conservatively model something in the 30% to 35% range on deposits.

And then just 1 more, if I could. It looks like your efficiency ratio is hovering right around that 50% mark. Curious as to how much of a push there is to get that under 50% and maybe what that would entail?

I don't think it's necessarily a push, but rather our desire to continue to make prudent investments and build for the future. So I think where we are is a really attractive level. If you look at a pure overhead management, the OpEx ratio at 183% and that's inclusive of some fairly significant intangible amortization is really quite well managed. So I don't know that there's a lot of room we're going to look to take down on that just because I think there's investments that we want to continue to make to support growth.

I would argue that we've been steadily making the requisite investments in our business to build out the platform for our future. The efficiency ratio, we will see that come down further by enhanced revenue opportunities. And then you might see a blip up with further investments. And I know obviously, we'll get a positive operating leverage, and you'll see it move back down. And that's kind of the trend we've been watching, but I think Tom says -- it's in this area, it can go down another point, if we're building the revenue base and then represent factor in future investments.

Yes, Tony made a really good point. I was focused on the expense side, but I think the revenue opportunities are there. You saw 2 consecutive quarters of nice growth and record levels for us. We do project core margin expansion over the next several quarters of, say, in the 3 to 5 basis point range each quarter. So and again, we talked about some of the investments that we hope to see returns on in the fee-based businesses over the course of the next year. A lot of room there.

Our next question comes from the line of Gregory Zingone with Piper Sandler.

Quick question. How frequently are you bumping into private credit firms nowadays?

I'm sorry, Greg, could you say that again? We have difficulty hearing you.

I asked how frequent are you bumping into private credit firms nowadays?

Yes. We know that's out there. We're not -- it's not really been a factor for us, at all. Most of the business we're doing is relational. So clients are not that reticent to go to private credit for 1 transaction knowing that the whole relationship is important to them and us. So again, we're very cognizant of it being out there and the scale of it. However, it has not been a factor in us building our pipeline or getting our deals closed.

Awesome. And at first glance, your average fee in wealth management of 70 bps seems kind of high. Have you felt any pressure on pricing recently?

I wouldn't say recently, it has actually come down. I can remember us being as high as 77 basis points probably 2 years ago or so. But it's been pretty stable, sorry...

I was going to ask on top of that, where are new relationships coming on today?

I would say similar levels because it has remained steady at 72 basis points for quite a few quarters now.

And then lastly for us, M&A is picking up in the industry, it seems like a pretty good time to ask you guys. What are you looking for in your next potential acquisitional target?

Well, I would actually answer the M&A question a little bit differently, right? So I think our primary focus here is on the organic growth strategies that we outlined. We're pretty excited about build-outs and our advancement at the middle market space, we think there's a huge opportunity for us to create shareholder value and 1 that we think is most relevant. That being said, we're always evaluating opportunities that might be out there. I think we've proven that we have a great merger DNA, we can get stuff done. We have the right platform to do that. We'd love to see our currency trade at a place, where it's more reflective of what we're worth. So we'll always evaluate opportunities from every direction, but it's a wonderful place to have the optionality, and we're creating that by having an organic growth and focusing there first.

All right. And our next question comes from the line of Stephen Moss with Raymond James.

Good. Maybe just starting on purchase accounting here. I realize it's probably elevated from the prepays this quarter. But curious as to how you guys are thinking about that going forward. And also on the subject of prepaid, just kind of curious, do you think those will continue to be elevated in the near term? Or do we -- from the fee income, kind of we're going to moderate down to more [indiscernible] levels?

I think the prepays, usually, if we look at past trends, the third quarter seemed to have a heightened pickup, which is the summer months. We expect that to normalize and maybe $150 million to $200 million range, I would say, is more normalized, but you always have in that number that I gave, there's a lot of businesses that sold as much as it wasn't a huge, huge number of refinancing elsewhere, probably $90 million of it refinanced elsewhere. So there's always going to be activities, companies selling companies coming. We just have to have an organizational capacity to grow at a level to make up for that. But if I were to put a number on it, I would say $200 million, $150 million, $200 million is probably a good place to be.

And with regard to purchase accounting, Steve, I'd say our normal number runs about 40 to 45 basis points of the NIM. I would expect that to persist throughout the next 4 quarters.

Great. And then kind of on the theme of organic growth and hiring. I heard you guys' comments around the efficiency ratio. Just kind of curious how you guys are thinking about hiring for 2026. You've definitely made a number of investments over the last 12-plus months. Kind of curious if there's maybe another step-up in terms of bringing people over in the new year or just color around that?

Yes. I mean, so I think we have a pretty good visual to our strategic planning process of what our needs are to give us the productivity in future years, particularly in areas of focus. It is our expectation that we'll continue to invest. If you look at what insurance does, we hire roughly 10 to 12 new producers every year to keep pace with that. We're expecting that to happen in the Beacon space, our commercial platform continues to hire not only in new geographies, but in verticals that we're investing deeper in. I would expect more investment in the middle market space for us next year. All of those things we have clarity of what the positive operating leverage will be derived from that. So it is part of our process in terms of forecasting and strategic planning that. We'll build all that out for you in the first quarter and you'll get a better clarity of the investment against the returns.

And it looks like there are no further questions at this time. So I'll now turn the call back over to Tony Labozzetta, for closing comments. Tony?

Great. Thanks everyone for your questions and for joining the call. We hope everyone has an enjoyable end of the year and a holiday season. We look forward to speaking with you again soon. Thank you.

Thanks, Tony. And again, this concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect. Have a good day, everyone.