Welcome to the Impinj Second Quarter 2025 Financial Results Conference Call and Webcast. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mr. Andy Cobb, Vice President, Strategic Finance. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Asha. Good afternoon, and thank you all for joining us to discuss Impinj's Second Quarter 2025 results. On today's call, Chris Diorio, Impinj's Co-Founder and CEO, will provide a brief overview of our market opportunity and performance. Cary Baker, Impinj's CFO, will follow with a detailed review of our second quarter financial results and third quarter outlook. We will then open the call for questions. You can find management's prepared remarks plus trended financial data on the company's Investor Relations website. We will make statements in this call about financial performance and future expectations that are based on our outlook as of today. Any such statements are forward-looking under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Whereas we believe we have a reasonable basis for making these forward-looking statements, our actual results could differ materially because any such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. We describe these risks and uncertainties in the annual and quarterly reports we file with the SEC. We do not undertake and expressly disclaim any obligation to update or alter our forward-looking statements, except as required by law. On today's call, all financial metrics, except for revenue or where we explicitly state otherwise, are non-GAAP. All balance sheet and cash flow metrics, except for free cash flow are GAAP. Please refer to our earnings release for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial metrics to the most comparable GAAP metrics. Before turning to our results and outlook, note that we will participate -- go for it, Tracy.

This is Tracy Moran with Investor Relations. Before turning to the results and outlook, note that we will participate in the 14th Annual Needham Virtual Industrial Tech, Robotics and Clean Tech 1x1 Conference on August 19; the Jefferies Semiconductor, IT Hardware and Communications Technology Conference on August 26 in Chicago; the Evercore 2025 Semiconductor, IT Hardware and Networking Conference on August 27 in Chicago; the Goldman Sachs Communacopia and Technology Conference 2025 on September 9 in San Francisco; and the Piper Sandler Growth Frontiers Conference on September 11 in Nashville. We look forward to connecting with many of you at those events. I will now turn the call over to Chris.

Thank you, Andy, and thank you, Tracy, and thank you all for joining the call. Our second quarter results were strong with revenue exceeding the upper end of our guide range. Adjusted EBITDA also exceeded our guide range while setting a new quarterly record. Endpoint ICs, reader ICs, readers and gateways all outperformed our expectations as category and use case expansion and 800 adoption and pull for Gen2X more than offset headwinds from tariffs, inflation and supply chain disruptions. We expect these same demand drivers to deliver sequential revenue growth in the third quarter. Our solutions strategy, focused on using our platform to solve enterprise challenges, is central to our strong results and outlook. The examples are many. In the second quarter, a leading apparel retailer began deploying overhead reading, delivering reader IC revenue and, looking forward, endpoint IC share gains. We won 2 new use cases at the visionary European retailer that delivered meaningful reader revenue in the second quarter and will again in the third. We also won new use cases at the second large North American supply chain and logistics end user that will deliver meaningful reader revenue in the third and fourth quarters. And retail loss analytics, derived from the loss prevention solution we developed for the visionary European retailer, drove second quarter demand for our readers and endpoint ICs and should again in the third quarter. At all these accounts, we either have or are focused on winning high endpoint IC share. M800 and Gen2X play a starring role in our strategy. In addition to the aforementioned wins, multiple item-level food accounts today use M800 for its superior performance on hard-to-read items, and we are piloting Gen2X for further readability improvements. Apparel, accessories, jewelry and myriad other item categories see faster handheld inventory counting using…

Thank you, Chris, and good afternoon, everyone. Second quarter revenue was $97.9 million, up 32% sequentially from $74.3 million in first quarter 2025 and down 4% year-over-year from $102.5 million in second quarter 2024. Second quarter endpoint IC revenue was $84.6 million, up 38% sequentially from $61.2 million in first quarter 2025 and down 5% year-over-year from $89.4 million in second quarter 2024. Excluding licensing revenue, endpoint IC product revenue grew 12% sequentially and declined 8% year-over-year, exceeding our expectations, albeit still at the low end of typical seasonal growth. We expect third quarter endpoint IC product revenue to increase sequentially, in line with typical seasonality. Second quarter systems revenue was $13.3 million, up 2% sequentially from $13.1 million in first quarter 2025 and up 1% year-over- year from $13.1 million in second quarter 2024. Systems revenue exceeded our expectations, driven by reader strength. Looking forward, we expect third quarter systems revenue to increase sequentially, led by strong reader and gateway demand. Second quarter gross margin was 60.4% compared with 52.7% in first quarter 2025 and 58.2% in second quarter 2024. The sequential increase was driven primarily by licensing revenue. The year-over-year increase was driven primarily by endpoint IC product mix, specifically a richer mix of M800 and by licensing revenue. Excluding licensing revenue, second quarter product gross margin was 52.6% compared with 51% in second quarter 2024. Looking forward, we expect third quarter product gross margin to increase sequentially. Total second quarter operating expense was $31.5 million compared with $32.6 million in first quarter 2025 and $32.8 million in second quarter 2024. Operating expense was below expectations as our team exercised good fiscal discipline. Research and development expense was $17.5 million. Sales and marketing expense was $6.7 million. General and administrative expense was $7.3 million. Looking forward, we expect…

[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Harsh Kumar with Piper Sandler.

Yes. First of all, Andy, we like working with you a lot. We hope you're okay, and you're simply overcome with emotions with the great results you're putting up. So I hope you're well. Question for Cary. Cary, as you look at your results of the strong beat you put up in the June quarter, you didn't have turns in there before. So I guess my first question is I want to understand how much of the beat in 2Q was turns related and how much of it was just tremendous strength that you saw? And then you're saying that you have minimal amount of turns in the third quarter guidance for September. And I want to just understand how much you're building in? If you can give us a percentage or maybe just some color if you don't want to give us a percentage? And then I've got a follow-up.

Yes. Sure, Harsh. Thanks for the question. So we continue operating in a very dynamic and rapidly changing market. In the second quarter, we did see more turns than we expected, but we also saw adjustments to delivery timing and location as our partners continue to optimize their geographic production strategies. This dynamic may continue into the third quarter. So we're deploying a similar approach in building our guidance, and we've assumed no additional turns at the midpoint of our guide. Now given our stated lead times and our inventory position, we could fill up a few more weeks of turns order in the third quarter. So this approach should give us enough room to absorb any potential request for order adjustments.

Great. And then you are talking about the margins being up quite substantially or they were already up and you're saying you had the benefit of M800 proliferating through the revenue stream. And then you talked also about some kind of wafer costs. Could you maybe elaborate on what you mean by that? And then I guess, maybe just give us a sense of which is a bigger factor? Is the wafer pricing better for you dramatically? Or is it mostly M800 coming through for you? Or is it something else altogether?

Yes, Harsh. So the M800 continues to ramp. It ramped nicely in the second quarter, and we expect it to do so again in the third quarter and again in the fourth quarter. So we are starting to see the benefit of the M800 cost advantage in our gross margin. We saw some of it in Q2. We'll see more of it in Q3. The comment as it relates to wafers is we are in an environment where we are back to normal ASP declines, where those ASP declines go into effect in the first quarter of the year. And typically, we support those ASP declines with wafer cost downs. The wafer cost down pricing also goes into effect at the beginning of the year. However, because we want to ensure supply to our customers, we carry approximately 6 months of forward- looking inventory. So we have to sell through that inventory first before we get to the wafers that are costed in 2025 pricing terms. So that's what we're seeing. Now we're 6 months through the year. We're starting to see the benefit of those cost downs on the wafer side that we achieved in the first quarter.

The next question comes from Christopher Rolland with Susquehanna.

So just as I look at some of your channel partners, so a large North American partner described kind of slower apparel and general retail growth, but faster or solid food and logistics growth. I guess, first of all, would you concur with those takes, agree with those takes? And then secondly, a partner out of Asia had softer 2Q sales. Are you seeing anything there with that partner as well?

So Chris, the answer to your first question is a simple yes. We feel good about our market position and good about our partnership with that North American partner, and the things that they're seeing in the market are basically what we're seeing in the market. That said, we don't always line up exactly with them. This year, for example, we saw first quarter supply chain and logistics correction and some mix shift changes separate from what they saw. But overall, in terms of the comments they've made, we're seeing the same thing out in the market. In terms of the Asian partner, we obviously have very good relationship with them as well. They're one of our -- also one of our top partners. They deliver very well into the market, and we expect continued strength from them going forward. Every company has corrections that they have to go through. We went through one in the first quarter. They're seeing a little bit of one right now. But in terms of their overall market position, in terms of how we engage with them, we continue to engage with them as a very close partner. And we feel great about where they're headed and about all of them. Just at the highest level, feel good about the market. Despite the macro headwinds, despite the tariff-related uncertainties, despite the things that are going on, you can see strength in the market. And the reason I highlighted our solution strategy is I feel good about our position in the market with that solution strategy driving strength for us overall.

We feel good about it, too. I wanted to ask you on the economics of Gen2X. I think it's just available on M800 ICs and then there's like a software or firmware update for readers. But is there any other kind of better economics associated with Gen2X like ASP or gross margin? Or is this just really all about like a faster transition to M800?

But right now, it's focused on a faster transition to M800. But perhaps more importantly, it's focused on enabling our enterprise customers with solutions that we couldn't solve previously. So we introduced Gen2X for all the reasons I said in the prepared remarks, improves readability and lower footprint and other things, and we're using Gen2X to enable enterprise solutions, which turns around and provides that virtuous cycle of pull for M800. So that's where you should focus. You should focus on us using Gen2X to enterprise solutions that we couldn't do previously.

The next question comes from Blayne Curtis with Jefferies.

Ezra Weener on for Blayne. I guess 2 quick ones. One, in terms of your overhead reading and other solutions that you are talking about bringing to market, can you help size the impact of what that means from both a reader but also from an endpoint IC perspective? And then secondly, can you just talk about what you're seeing from channel inventory? I know you had talked about 2 extra weeks for supply chain optionality, but you also talked a little bit about inventory coming down in the quarter. So can you talk about the moving pieces there?

So thanks, Blayne. I'll take the first question, and I'll let Cary take the second one. So in regards to the opportunity with these enterprise customers and really where our focus is, let me just start by saying the overhead reading opportunity is primarily a reader IC opportunity. We're supporting a partner there, not a direct reader and gateway opportunity. With that said, our ability to enhance the performance and then demonstrate further performance enhancement benefits with Gen2X, we're using to drive our endpoint IC market share. In general, the enterprises that we engage directly with have high or very high Impinj endpoint IC market share, and that is our goal of engaging with these enterprises from our perspective. So we're monetizing the relationships by selling readers and gateways, of course, but primarily in the recurring revenue stream from the endpoint ICs. At the same time, when we commit to an enterprise end user, we truly commit to them. So what you're seeing in these recurring engagements is us committing to them, them committing to us and us working in partnership with the enterprise to drive further use case, they become core partners for our learnings, they become reference customers for us, and they allow us to advance our position in the market, all while maintaining high endpoint IC market share. So that is essentially our solutions focus, and you can see it in every account, every enterprise account that we work directly with.

Ezra, this is Cary. Regarding your channel inventory question, we anticipated a modest channel inventory build in Q2 as our partners continue building geographic production optionality. However, we actually saw channel inventory come down even as they built that optionality. Overall, we believe channel inventory is healthy compared to our inlay partner demand, and we expect the weeks of channel inventory to roughly stay in this range for the foreseeable future. So we feel really good about where we are from a channel perspective.

The next question comes from Troy Jensen with Cantor Fitzgerald.

Congrats on another great quarter here. I want to talk -- well, maybe 2 verticals here. So specifically, logistics, obviously, you've done well. You kind of commented on 2 customers there. Can you just talk about the pipeline or the opportunity? Is there more big deals in the logistics vertical in the coming quarters?

So Troy, yes, there are more opportunities in the logistics space. But what I'd like to do right now is kind of get you to think about broadening that aperture a bit because there are straight supply chain and logistics customers. And then there are a variety of retailers and others who manage their own supply chains. And right now, given the tariff situation, all of those enterprise end users or enterprise customers are looking to improve the resiliency and flexibility of their supply chains. So even when we talk about food opportunities and other things, we're still talking, in many cases, about supply chain resiliency and flexibility. So you should expect us to continue talking about supply chain and logistics, but broadening the aperture beyond just pure SC&L or e-commerce companies to kind of just everybody who has a supply chain, which is essentially every one of our customers.

Great. Okay. And then for Cary, are you allowed to give us what the license revenues were in Q2?

Yes, you'll see it in our 10-Q, it was $16 million.

Was that up from $15 million or up from $15.5 million? Or where was it last year? I'm curious.

Up from $15 million last year.

The next question comes from Jim Ricchiuti with Needham & Company.

I joined a little bit late, just going through the transcript. But Cary, I was hoping if you didn't give this and I just haven't gotten to it. The improvement you're expecting in product gross margins in Q3. I mean it sounds like you're looking -- you're more optimistic not only on the endpoint IC business, but also on the systems portion of the business. I mean, it sounds like these are multiple drivers that impact your Q3 gross margins and then presumably, as you look at Q4, you get a better mix of M800 and maybe more systems business. But I'm just wondering, is there any more color you can provide if you haven't on gross margins?

Yes, Jim, I think the biggest drivers of the gross margin increase on a quarter-over-quarter basis for Q3 that we're signaling is, first, the M800 mix. It's continuing to ramp. I expect the M800 to achieve volume running status at some point this year. I don't think it blends for the full year, and I don't think it reaches its terminal mix in 2025, but we're starting to hit our stride on the M800, and you're seeing that benefit come through in Q3 gross margin, and we signaled it again in the fourth quarter gross margin. Then the second factor that's helping us is we're finally getting to the lower-cost wafers. So this goes back to Harsh's question earlier on, where, yes, we're back in a normal pricing environment where we deliver ASP declines to our customers that go into effect at the beginning of the year. We support those with wafer cost downs. But because we carry 6 months of forward-looking inventory to ensure supply to our customers, it takes us 6 months to get to those lower-cost wafers. We're starting to see that benefit now.

Okay. And you also signaled -- sorry, go ahead.

Yes. I just remembered the second part of your question, you asked about OpEx. I expect OpEx to increase in the third quarter.

Okay. And maybe just a follow-up on that inlay partner in North America. The messaging also being more optimistic about food, they seem to call out proteins and as being another opportunity. And Chris, I'm wondering, as you think about the opportunity has been talked about has been bakery departments. You've talked about some other areas, but how quickly could we see this adoption as it relates to proteins?

Yes. So Jim, first, I look at bakery, proteins and fresh. At the pallet and case level, there are active deployments ongoing. At the item level, I would still characterize what's going out on in the market as pilots. Of course, they're food size pilots, which means they're large, but I would still call them pilots. Both our close partner and we are very excited about all of those opportunities. And we see and we're guardedly optimistic that those pilots are really going to turn into full-fledged deployments because as you heard in some of the other prepared remarks from others, the ROI is positive. I will say that given the size of the food category and given it's -- we're in the early innings, that don't expect things to ramp just instantaneously. It's going to take time. As I've always said, the bigger the category, the longer it takes. But with that caveat, I'm about as excited as I could be about the food opportunity because the pace at which we see enterprises either piloting or being interested reminds me of what happened in the early days of retail apparel once we got over the hump of having the right level of products that worked and everything like that. There was a rapid surge in interest and demand, which then turned into the market we have today. I'm seeing the same thing in food. I'm excited, I'm bullish but that said, it takes time.

[Operator Instructions] The next question comes from Scott Searle with ROTH Capital.

Great job on the quarter, guys. Chris, maybe to follow up on Jim's question to dive in a little bit deeper on the food front. You've talked about the 2 larger customers and pilots that have been ongoing in bakery, fresh proteins and private label. I'm wondering if you could give us more of a 30,000-foot view in terms of the level of engagement across the industry? And then the time lines, maybe digging in a little bit more on that front. Next year, do we start to see more accelerated push into not just the categories you talked about, but getting a little bit broader, getting down to the item level, and what does it take to get down to the item level? It sounds like Gen2X is certainly a key component of that but does it also require the holy grail, the $0.01 tag to start to tag everything within the foodservice opportunity? And then I had a follow-up.

Yes. Okay. I'm going to do my best on this question, but there's a lot of pieces to it. So the close partner that we've mentioned a couple of times so far on this call already cited in their prepared remarks that one of their customers is seeing a positive -- a more positive ROI in Big 3 than they had expected. And I think -- and I'm not surprised by that. I think it really highlights the opportunity that RAIN RFID brings and the fact that enabling those enterprises to track their items using expiration dates, the value proposition that it brings in food freshness, reduce food waste and increase sales to their consumers. So I am -- like I said to Jim, I'm very excited about the food opportunity. I am not overestimating how quickly it's going to go. But I do believe that given the state of the pilots that are happening now, the positive results that we've seen and the readability on items that food is going to go at the item level. We're already seeing it at a palette and case level. It will go at the item level. I believe that what we should do over the next couple of quarters is focus on those categories where expiration date matters. So bakery items, deli items, proteins, things that expire quickly and they're useless if you don't sell them before they expire. I think that's where the return is we're going to see over -- for a good while before food migrates to other categories. I could be proven wrong in the out years, but I suspect for right now, we're on the right track, and that's where you see the adoption happening. So we'll keep talking about food in upcoming calls, and I'm sure others will as well. And as you poke around a little bit more and try to owners some stores and things like that, you might actually see items tagged in some of the stores where you buy things even today. I don't know if I answered your question.

You did. I apologize, it was very amorphous and wide open. But let me ask this. So in the second half of '26, is there a number of commercial deployments you would expect at that period of time? Or is there a number of units that you would be willing to believe that foodservice will be a part of 5% to 10% of units exiting next year? Or is that too difficult to determine at the current time? And then just one other question from a systems level perspective. A lot of, I think, engagements or discussions going on with other big box retailers leveraging the Walmart supply chain. I'm wondering any updates on that front? It sounds like the systems outlook is pretty healthy. I'm wondering if you could dive down a little bit into that in terms of where it's coming in terms of new customers, what that opportunity pipeline looks like.

Okay. Thanks. I'll do my best. On the food opportunity, item level food, I look to 2026 as to driving meaningful volumes. It's -- like I said, we're in the pilot phase now. Anything on the food size is large, but in terms of really meaningful volumes and actually seeing those pilots turn into full-fledged ramps, we're looking at next year. That doesn't take away at all from the excitement. In terms of big box expansion in general merchandise, we are seeing the large North American retailer continue to push forward and continue adopting in the categories they've already announced. We also see them piloting and doing R&D on additional categories. The pace and timing of which they continue to roll out is clearly going to be up to them, but they continue moving forward, and we're excited to be supporting them. We do see those general merchandise categories beginning to trickle down to other retailers and significantly big box suppliers but there haven't been any big announcements that I am aware of. And I can't say when there will be one, but there are some trickle-down effects that are going on. And then fixed reading versus handheld reading versus what we're seeing out in the environment. For the fresh stuff in retail -- I'm sorry, for food freshness, let me be clear. For food freshness, we're seeing that predominantly being driven by handheld readers, employees going out in the store and finding they're about to expire items. In other parts of the industry, including in food for item -- I mean, for case and pallet level, we are seeing a resurgence of autonomous reading, which is where a lot of our demand for our readers and gateways is coming from. The autonomous reading, whether it's overheads, dock doors, front store, back store, store exits, loss prevention, loss identification, it's all driving demand for fixed reading, and that's where we're seeing that resurgence in fixed reading, and we are putting a significant focus on it as a company. Did I get it all?

Yes, you got it all.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Chris Diorio, Co-Founder and CEO, for closing remarks. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. I'd like to thank you all for joining our call today, and thank you for your ongoing support. Take care. Bye-bye.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.