Hello, everyone. Thank you for attending today's Planet Labs PBC First Quarter and Fiscal 2025 Earnings Call. My name is Sierra and I'll be your moderator for today. All lines will be muted during the presentation portion of the call with an opportunity for questions and answers at the end. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to pass the conference over to our host, Chris Genualdi, VP of Investor Relations. Please proceed.

Thanks, operator. And hello, everyone. This is Chris Genualdi, Vice President of Investor Relations at Planet Labs PBC. Welcome to Planet's first quarter of fiscal 2025 earnings call. I'm joined today by Will Marshall and Ashley Johnson, who will provide a recap of our results and discuss our current outlook. We encourage everyone to please reference the earnings press release and earnings update presentation for today's call, which are available on our Investor Relations website. Before we begin, we'd like to remind everyone that we may make forward-looking statements related to future events or our financial outlook. We also may reference qualified pipeline which represents potential sales leads that have not yet executed contracts. Any forward-looking statements are based on management's current outlook, plans, estimates, expectations, and projections. The inclusion of such forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by Planet that future plans, estimates, or expectations will be achieved. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties and assumptions as detailed in our SEC filings, which can be found at www.sec.gov. Our actual results or performance may differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements, and we undertake no responsibility to update such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. During the call, we will also discuss historic and forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures. We use these non-GAAP financial measures for financial and operational decision-making as a means to evaluate period-to-period comparisons. We believe that these measures provide useful information about operating results, enhance the overall understanding of past financial performance and future prospects, and allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in its financial and operational decision-making. For more information on the non-GAAP financial measures, please see the reconciliation tables provided in our press release issued earlier this afternoon. Further, throughout this call, we provide a number of key performance indicators used by management and often used by competitors in our industry. These and other key performance indicators are discussed in more detail in our press release and our earnings update presentation, which are intended to accompany our prepared remarks. At this time, I'd now like to turn the call over to Will Marshall, Planet's CEO, Chairperson, and Co-Founder. Over to you, Will.

Thanks, Chris, and hello, everyone. Thanks for joining the call today. Planet delivered a solid quarter to start the year. For the first quarter of fiscal year 2025, we generated a record $60.4 million in revenue, representing 15% year-on-year growth, driven by the strength in the government sector. Non-GAAP gross margin for the quarter was 55% and adjusted EBITDA loss was $8.4 million. These results were all in line with, or better than, the guidance provided on our last earnings call. Q1 marked our fourth sequential quarter of quarter-over-quarter improvement in adjusted EBITDA as we progress towards our target of achieving adjusted EBITDA profitability by Q4 of this fiscal year. We also launched the Planet Insights Platform in April, which extends our market reach and empowers our customers and partners to easily access and build solutions with our data. Let's go into more detail in Q1, starting with the continued strength that we're seeing in the government sector. Higher security needs, increased sustainability requirements, and global climate risks are fueling government customer demand for our broad area monitoring capabilities and solutions. In the defense and intelligence sector specifically, revenue grew approximately 25% year-over-year. We're pleased to share that the National Reconnaissance Office, NRO, has exercised a priced option of the EOCL contract with Planet, which includes PlanetScope monitoring, SkySat high resolution tasking and access to our data archive. As a reminder, a portion of our five-year base period contract with the NRO had price options that could be exercised by them at the two-year anniversary of the award. We're pleased to have secured this important renewal and are proud to continue serving the US Government's needs. We see meaningful opportunity to expand our relationship with the US government as the EOCL contract continues and we bring new solutions and capabilities…

Thanks, Will. To kick things off, I'd like to share a quick reflection from my first couple months serving as Planet's president. First of all, the go-to-market product and engineering teams at Planet are some of the most innovative and driven professionals I've had the privilege to work with during my career. I'm impressed every day by the work they are doing and the passion that they put behind it. In collaborating with these leaders and examining many of our key operating metrics together, we also see opportunities to enable these teams to work in ways that are better aligned to the markets and customers we're serving. We are focused on driving operational efficiency and efficacy to re-accelerate our growth and continue our path to profitability. We'll share more on these efforts over the course of the year. Now turning to the quarter, revenue for the first quarter in fiscal 2025 came in at a record $60.4 million, which represents 15% year-over-year growth. As Will mentioned, revenue growth in the first quarter was led by government customers while we continue to face headwinds in the commercial vertical, largely driven by contractions among agricultural customers. Our product and go-to-market teams are focused on fueling the momentums we're seeing in the government sector, while shifting our investments in the commercial sector toward lowering our cost to acquire and serve these markets by leveraging our partner ecosystem and Insights Platform. From a geographic perspective, during the first quarter North American revenue grew approximately 15% on a year-over-year basis. EMEA revenue grew approximately 11% year-over-year and Asia Pacific grew approximately 10% year--ver year, while our team in Latin America drove revenue growth of over 50% year-over-year. As of the end of Q1, our end-of-period customer count was 1,031 customers. Recurring ACV, or annual contract…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question today comes from Trevor Walsh with JMP. Please proceed.

Great. Thanks team for taking my questions. Maybe I'll start, Will, with you. If -- can you just give a little bit of your thoughts around the Tanager-1 launch and where you might think the kind of immediate impacts to the business might come from that from a revenue perspective and maybe just keeping it simple breaking it out kind of between defense and intelligence, civil government, commercial kind of just between those three buckets where you think you see kind of the immediate demand coming from?

Yeah, absolutely. I'm actually very excited that that sounds like the launch time. We're looking forward to that launch scheduled for July. And yeah, we have an early access program with folks across defense and intelligence, commercial like oil and gas, agriculture as well as civil government. And we believe that there's strong interest there. It is early days. But breaking it down by fractions, it's going to be impossible at this point. But remember that it won't be starting from complete zero because of that early access program trying all the synthetic data that we're developing. And as we mentioned last time, we do have a contract already that involves providing data on the methane side that we have revenue to recognize there when we are delivering data. So it's not starting in scratch. So what I would like to say is that day one it will be 100% back because that's the deal we have.

Great, thank you. I appreciate the color on that. Yeah, absolutely. Thank you. Ashley, maybe just switching gears a little bit, understood the kind of softness around commercial customers and especially in the agricultural space. I guess two-part question there. One is from a numbers perspective. It looked like the percentage of the business in the quarter ticked down in commercial from about 29% to 22% just looking at your investor deck charts you have there. Is that a combination of both the strength in the D&I business compounded by the kind of contractions in the agricultural space are just broadly within commercial or is it one outweighing the other there in terms of the contribution? And then second question, can you maybe just double-click a little bit in terms of what's happening within that agricultural arena to kind of have customers either reducing spend or shifting gears a little bit on that front?

Yeah, I'm happy to take that. I'd say quarter over quarter we definitely saw a downtick in the commercial sector, driven primarily by some of the larger agricultural contracts that we've referenced earlier where we've seen our customers really facing their own challenges. Several of them are public companies, but you can see more directly the headwinds that are hitting them. And so we obviously really value these relationships. We believe in the long-term opportunities for the agricultural sector. So we work with these customers to figure out how to reduce the scope of what we offer to them and maintain that commercial relationship but also maintain our pricing so that we have the opportunity to grow with them as their business returns. Actually I’ll turn it over to Will to talk about kind of how we see the outlook in the agricultural space because we do see this as an important sector for us in the medium to long term.

Yeah, exactly. I very much believe in that market opportunity. I mean fundamentally our data can enable improvement in crop yield and decrease in inputs which enable real efficiency gains across that trillion dollar sector. They're having struggles in general as a sector, facing pretty strong headwind. But fundamentally, those facts remain true. The problem, if there was any, is that they were using digital ag platforms that they were largely giving away, which wasn't an aligned incentive model. And it's the kind of thing they can't win their having part time. Actually, now we're finding several partnerships, some of which we've talked about, in fact, several of the big ag companies have even released videos and things showing use by data in these ways. But they're reforming their digital ag platforms such that they align incentives. That is, when the [indiscernible] benefits, they get the money. When they get the money, we get the money. When you rely on incentives like that, we can really imagine that scaling. So as Ashley was saying, we're keeping those relationships strong so that they can come back up. I was just also noting, when you were asking about the commercial sector slightly more broadly, we still see a lot of strength in that market more broadly. Agriculture was our biggest sector. But just to touch on a couple of other examples from the last quarter was ZEP-RE, which we previously mentioned, just as an expansion, They're doing these automatic drought insurance products in Africa and they got to their five year milestone within the first two years of getting to I think 1.6 million pastoralists, which is huge. BSS, to talk about an ag customer, did an expansion to do the sustainable agriculture monitoring. PG&E, outside the ag sector now, talking about they were using our data for better serve encroachment in power lines and they did an expansion also in Q1 and also showed some pretty good breakthroughs in the number of fires that were being started. It was something like a 70% reduction in fire that started because of their efforts to reduce vegetation near their power lines. So these are really important value propositions for these customers. A lot of that small, I think that we, in terms of the outlook in agriculture, is probably going to be still relatively soft this year, but perhaps we can expect to see something grow more from that seed corn in next year.

Great. Thank you both. Appreciate it.

Next question today comes from Kristine Liwag with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed.

Hey, good afternoon, everyone. Will and Ashley, in terms of the government opportunities you highlighted, you mentioned last quarter pursuing NGA's Luno program and it looks like since they've announced Luno B and the A and B portions of the programs could be like about $500 million in ceiling combined. So I guess how big of a focus is this for you? How do you think about positioning? Is this one of the big defense opportunities you had referenced and when would you expect to make a decision or hear about a decision?

Yeah, that's certainly an opportunity we're steering. You're right, the track budget, that's right. They recently announced that they increased that budget from $290 million to $490 million. So obviously the NGA has a strong interest in this sort of analytics and AI on top of satellite imagery. We believe we're in a unique position with our daily scan to be able to search large areas that no one else can do, frankly. And that's very exciting. So we're definitely competing for that and we'll keep you up to date.

Great. If I could sneak a second question here. It's great to hear that you've been making progress on AI. That's clearly a big driver of growth. A few months ago, we saw Spire announce a collaboration with NVIDIA to advance AI-driven weather prediction. I guess, can you provide more context regarding the AI opportunities you're pursuing? And is there an opportunity for you to also collaborate with NVIDIA, and what could that look like?

Yeah, I'm very excited by all the prospects in AI. Obviously, we use it in some of our core products today. We've mentioned previously some of the incredible results of our roads and buildings. Road detection enabled us to work with Brazil on the [DPCP] (ph) workstation. And some of our new products, like you were asking about Luno, of course, they're interested in the use of AI on top of our forward scan, which is unlocking new potential there. So both present products and new products that we're working on involve AI. We're very excited about collaboration with a lot of different large players. We've got nothing to announce today regarding NVIDIA.

Great. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Our next question today comes from Jason Gursky. Please proceed.

Hey, good afternoon, everybody. Well, I wanted to start on Tanager. I'm not sure if I heard exactly your answer there as it relates to revenue generation on Tanager. So can you confirm that you get Tanager up and running and that on a quarter-on-quarter basis you're going to be generating higher levels of revenue? I just want to kind of try to better understand exactly what Tanager is going to add to the revenue next year.

I mean, foundationally it's providing a huge data stream that can drive a lot of different use cases. As we mentioned, defensive intelligence, biodiversity monitoring, emissions, and so on. It is an amazing market. As I mentioned, we do have this early access program. So that enables those customers to get up and running when we're producing operational data. So that system has the potential to be operational from the first satellite, so that's exciting, but we are in a nascent market there, so we're obviously going to be building that at the time. The way we're doing that is you're doing the early access program to get those folks going, but also, as I actually mentioned last time, we have a $20 million contract with Carbon Mapper in order to buy some of the data to get going on the emission side of things. So that helps us to get going. Obviously, therefore, it's going to be incremental revenue. And we think it's an exciting area long term, but it's a nascent market. Are you going to add, Ashley?

Yeah, just a reminder that that contract is for outer period. So obviously, it's contingent on one. Yeah, certain milestones around the data generated by the satellite. So we don't expect to see revenue from that contract in the next couple of quarters, but we'll keep you posted as we get to our first site with this exciting new satellite.

Okay, yeah that is helpful. Yeah I appreciate that. And then on the DoD side of things and the three pilots that you've been working on, two have been completed. Is there a possibility here that what we could be adding that a revenue would be something at the scale of your annual EOCL contract? Can you just kind of help us better understand what you think you've got here on the horizon potentially?

Yeah, I mean we're very excited about those pilots because they're generating real capabilities already for the Defense Department, in this case, we're seeing interest around the Defense Department and internationally. They're producing capabilities that they don't have a peripheral vision enabling them to monitor large areas for threats. And that's the combination of our daily scan PlanetScope AI. I do think it's scale operations. So yeah, we believe there's large opportunities there and yeah, these pilots we believe will build -- we expect to do more pilots and then eventually build into operational contracts there. But yes, we believe they are scale opportunities and I just noticed that they are all dependent on this PlanetScope data scan. So we again believe we're in a pretty unique position to go after that.

And just to remind you, it's incredible the pilots that we're seeing. They can scale across multiple dimensions. So the scope of the pilot, how much area we're monitoring, the amount of services that we're providing on top of it, and then also time because we've been doing time-bound pilots. But to speculate exactly how they will scale and getting the budgets lined up to support those operational opportunities is where we don't have the visibility at this time. And so, we're very excited about the early results from the pilots, but speculating as to whether this could be as big as an ESDL-type award would not be prudent for us to do at this time.

Will, you did the word, large, here. So maybe you can just baseline things for us out here in the investment community. When you use the word large opportunity, is that a five-figure deal, a six-figure deal, seven, eight, nine? How about that word large in your vocabulary?

[That's already seven figure deal as it was, pilots,] (ph) right? So it's definitely going to be bigger than that.

Okay, great. Will, can you give us an update on Pelican and where we go to from here based on the recent tech demo that you did?

Yeah, I'm very pleased with how that tech demo continues to perform, testing all the technology aspects of that. And so far, it's very good. And as I mentioned in my remarks, it's feeding into the ability to do the Tanager emissions. They use the same bus. So there's no need to go into that. And as I mentioned last time, we are building towards operational satellites that we expected in 12 months of when I mentioned that last time, so it's still holding to that sort of timeframe. We are very pleased with the progress of that program.

Okay. So we're going to have some more launches coming in the next 12 months. Is that the right way to think about it?

Yeah.

Okay, great. And then what about international demand in the D&I area? Are there any opportunities for you all, [indiscernible], Japan, the Middle East, is there any of our allied nations that might want something similar to any OCL kind of construct?

Yeah, I mean there are absolutely opportunities with governments around the world and we have to be pursuing them. And we have existing relationships with many US allies around the world. We talked about several of them before, a longstanding relationship with Japan, for example, Germany, for example, and others. So yes, and there's a lot of expansion and opportunity there. They are absolutely looking at both what is happening in Ukraine, seeing the value of satellite data there, and being keen-eyed on that. And they're also looking to the US as leaders in this dimension and following it. And in some senses, they're in an even more eager position because the US has more capacity of its own. Those countries have less. And so ours enable them to get there without the degree of billions that the US government is spending. And they get a lot of those capabilities at lower cost. So there is a strong demand signal and I've been to several of those countries in recent times and I'm actively working with the sales team on maturing those partnerships.

Okay, great. And then two last quick ones for me. The European regulations around deforestation and some of the basic products coming into the EU and the supply chain needing to demonstrate that they're not leading to deforestation. And I know there's an acronym associated with this regulation. I can't remember off the top of my head. [indiscernible] But can you just give us a little bit of an update on the company's involvement in helping those that are importing those goods into the EU, demonstrating that their products aren't leading to deforestation? Has that been any kind of catalyst at all for demand for Planet?

Yeah, we are seeing interest there and we've been approached by several governments for example that have been affected by this where companies outside the EU that have a lot of commodity producers for the EU and are frankly scrambling to try to put together systems so that industries aren't adversely affected by this and help provide their industries with centralized systems. So we're working with civil government. We have discussions with companies that are interested in this too. Just slightly more broadly, another thing we had launched this last quarter was an initiative with Salesforce and ERM and NatureMetrics, which is meant to be a solution to help biodiversity monitoring, which is also coming up as a question that you asked about, the deforestation piece. So biodiversity is also coming, so more broadly, and that's to help companies track their nature-based targets as well as their carbon ones. So yes, we do see this happening. Is it big? Not yet, but we believe this is really driving the market long term for us.

Last one for me, actually I can't let a quarter go by without asking you about cash flow breakeven and when do we get there?

Of course. As I said on the call, we are continuing to make progress on getting to our target this year of EBITDA profitability, which is the first step to cash flow profitability. And obviously, we're a business with gross margins that can support continued scale and expansion so that we can get to cash flow profitability ahead of needing to raise an additional cash flow. [indiscernible].

Our next question today comes from Ryan Koontz with Needham & Company. Please proceed.

Hi, thanks for the question and nice to hear the great progress in the government side and understand there's some strategic resets sound like going on the commercial side and I know you've talked in the past about some of your efforts there on commercial are going to be with partners and we've heard some partner announcements in the past and what if you get -- give us an update there and any kind of milestones that we should look out for -- that we should look for with your partners as far as first deals or first sizable important strategic deals that we might look for from some of your commercial partners either in ag or otherwise? Thanks.

I think it's very important that a lot of our business, commercial and otherwise, in-built partners. It's really about leading to a partner first model to enable us to scale that side of the business. And as we talked about on the prepared remarks, a big part of that is enabling partners to be able to self-serve and build solutions on top of our data. And our strategy is focused on enabling all of that through our platform. So making it easier for partners to work with our data, test our data, so giving them a sandbox environment, giving them more of a self-serving experience in working with our data to test their solutions and then enabling them to more easily scale on top of the platform, which also one, reduces their total cost of ownership of working with Planet because they don't have to then download and extract the data and try to predict where their end customers are ultimately going to need data, but rather they can access the data and work inside a Planet environment. The benefit to us is that it also gives us the visibility to the end customer through that motion. So we can see as the partner is engaging and expanding the business, not only the revenue benefits, but the type of usage data that will enable us to provide feedback into our own product development life cycle. So I'd say partners has always been a very important part of our strategy. As we've talked about before, we think that this is a really important way for us to scale the business profitably. And the investments that we're making around the platform are really about enabling that to scale and serve the needs that we're hearing from our partners that will make their life easier and then make it easier for them to build their own solutions on top of that data.

I may add that we did have some milestone this last quarter including the launch of the Planet Insight Platform and our first on the road event in Berlin where we're talking to our partner ecosystem. We had thousands of people come to our launch of the platform, we had hundreds of our partners join that first regional planning on the road. And we're doing another one next week in Washington DC, so North America and the market. We really believe in those partners, and the ecosystem approach is how we're doing it, enabling them simple ways with pricing and packaging that's appropriate for them on our platform. And it's very much the thesis of our acquisition and synergize to do that. And I think it enables us to do the expansion into those commercial markets in a low-cost way.

That's really great. And on that new platform you're announcing here, where are we in that kind of roadmap of having a product that the sectors or customer verticals you're chasing after that you feel that platform is fully featured enough to be widely adopted? Do you feel like we're there with this first version one or is this a roadmap where -- go ahead.

Yeah, I mean, it's never fair. There's always more things to be adding, but it is there in the sense that it's already operational and customers are using it and it has core capabilities. I think it's less measured in how many vertical markets can be succeed with on that platform because that's more or less to the partner solution department in that case for the platform but it is a more about the foundation tools that enable all of those to work and that's what this is about. I mean in some cases it's really just pulling off the boring bits so that they can focus on their solutions in that particular vertical market. And we have seen already that central hub users, they had thousands of users on their platform, started to now get access to Planet's data on it through that after that launch. And we've seen Planet's customers start using accounts from Central Hub so that they can get the tools to apply to the data they already have access to. So in both ways, we've seen it be a success and sort of influencing pipeline.

Got it. Super. And just a quick clarification on your UK announcement. Is this for -- again, is this for a platform partner that it will be a channel for you or is this a contract win for this customer to share your data with their customers? I'm a little confused as to the structure of the deal.

Yeah, that partner in this case is helping the UK government to build that platform for the government internal use is my understanding.

Got it. All right, that's all I have. Thanks so much.

Thanks, Ryan.

Our next question today comes from Jeff Van Rhee with Craig-Hallum. Please proceed.

Great, thanks. Just a couple of cleanups for me. Ashley, on the gross margin, obviously considerably better than you expected, given you guided most of the way through the quarter. What changed? I wasn't clear how that came in so much better.

A couple of factors. So, as I said, one was seeing more savings from some of the initiatives that our development team has been working on in cloud infrastructure than we anticipated. I'd say that was one of the biggest drivers that the improvement in gross margin versus our expectations. And then, as I mentioned before, it's also just a mix of revenue. So, in terms of what that meant in terms of partner fees, I think we came in roughly close to what we had said on that front, about 3% from partner fees. But I think that we can give ourselves a little bit of buffer there just not being 100% sure of what the next business would be on the quarter.

Okay. And on ag if I could, would you say that the challenges in ag are more macro related or go to market friction related?

It is macro for sure.

Yeah, I think as Will talked about, a lot of it is the focus of that market has been around these digitalized platforms and using it almost as a loss leader. And as the macro has had impact on the margins of our customers, they've had to look at things like these types of initiatives and pull back and really rethink how they want to deliver these types of solutions to their end customers in a more aligned way.

And in many ways, that was a journey they were already on, but this is now forcing them to reset and do it. And we have already some partnerships in that line, the incentive line, but it's not got to the scale that we were at even in these more free digital ag platform pieces. But eventually it will drive decision ag, which enables all the things we talked about, which is sufficient for that trillion-dollar sector.

Okay, great. I'll leave it there.

Thank you. I guess that's the way it goes. It's not towards [ag] (ph).

Yeah.

Our next question today comes from Edison Yu with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed.

Hey, thank you for taking our questions. One, to come back to AI. I know it's a big buzzword right now. Everyone's talking about it, all the valuations, I'm sure you've noticed have been popping on it. How do we think about the end game for you guys of where you want to get to? Is it Queryable Earth demo you showed before? And if that is the ultimate goal, what are we missing or what do we need to happen to get there? Is it more faster, cheaper compute? Is it better algos? What's the -- what do we kind of need to do to get to that end state?

That's a great question. Again, AI is already powering a lot of our relationships, like the Brazil case and many others that are using that. It's powering a lot of our planetary variables. The carbon forest one is another one coming up that we're already seeing good adoption on that is powered by AI. And then there's these future capabilities where it's more to do with leveraging the foundations of large language models. Those are where we have these pilots, which is pretty narrowly focused at the minute on D&I but it's building up capabilities with horizontal applicability. So those large language models enable one fundamentally to search through our data stack and over large area and time which is a completely novel capability. But we need to work on accuracy and other things of course and to test quickly with tight collaboration with the government and the users so that we get to a point where it's really driving significant value for them. So that's the focus there. And then we are also working to enable our partners to be able to build their own AI models on top of our platform so that we can let a thousand flowers bloom in that sense across all the other markets. So think of it as a narrow effort focused on government clients and then aboard a platform tool capability. As for Queryable Earth, I mean, I think that's the enders game in that that's the generic system that enabled all of these, but that path to get there is what I just mentioned.

Understood. Appreciate the color. And one on the financials. I know you're not giving full-year guidance, but just directionally, should we think about the second half growth trajectory at the very least increasing or is there any -- I realize this could be a wide range of outcomes but just any kind of directional color on the second half growth?

Yeah. I mean as we're thinking about growth for the remainder of the year, each market that we're in has different dynamics. So on the D&I side, obviously blocking in the ESDL renewal was fantastic to have that stability and visibility. And obviously, they're an important customer also because of the other opportunities that we're pursuing and operating within the US government. And a lot of these opportunities translate into international opportunities as well. So very optimistic about the opportunities within D&I and the continued strength and growth we've seen there. Civil government can fluctuate quarter to quarter depending on consumption patterns, budget availability, those types of factors but it's been great to see steady solid growth in the civil government space and Sentinel Hub really enables us to sort of set market and some of the rural human agencies and other opportunities that synergize already had underway when we acquired them. And I think the big question is really around the commercial segment. So we do expect to see continued headwinds, but the ability to stabilize that for some of the initiatives that we're making in shifting to a more platform-led, product-led model and leveraging the partner community will really hopefully help us offset that. So, we're from my own side in trying to manage expenses and make sure that we hit that EBITDA profitability goal in Q4. Our assumption is that revenue growth is not going to accelerate beyond the range that we've provided for Q2, which really points to kind of a first half, second half page in what you've seen in other years. I hope that's helpful, color.

That's great. Appreciate it. Thank you.

Great. Thanks, Edison.

Our next question comes from Mike Latimore with Northland. Please proceed.

Great. Just on EOCL, can you clarify the amount you're getting on this renewal? Is the next 12 months from EOCL similar to prior 12 months?

Yes, so basically just to remind you, the way the contract was structured was for the first five years, there was a committed amount, base amount of about $19 million. So that's per year over the first five years. And then there was an incremental award of about $25.5 million per year that was committed for the first two years. And so that's the portion that was up for renewal. And we did secure that full renewal. So the next 12 months should look as secure as the same amount as prior 12 months.

Okay, thanks. And on the AI pilots, sounds like they were successful you concluded them. Is the next step looking for more pilots with the same customer or is it potential commercialization of the use case?

Yeah, we are expecting more pilots with the same customer as well as other pilots with other customers in the US government and international interest as well. Eventually our clients of course convert them to large operational contract vehicles like we have spoken about and there's really large opportunities to go after across the board there. And it's our job to execute them on. So this is why, as Ashley was just saying the previous question, with operationally planning, like the growth rate that we currently have, and certainly we're not satisfied with that and getting these big deals in where we're really mind, especially attention is to try and mature those opportunities.

Great. And then a pilot, how long does a seven-figure pilot typically last?

I'm not sure that we can speak to typically, but these have been short-term pilots within a single quarter. But depending on the size of the pilot, a seven-figure pilot could also be over a longer period of time. It really depends on the scope and what exactly we're piloting.

On agency [indiscernible].

Exactly. What's great is, as you know, securing operational budgets, that's a procedure that takes time. What's an exciting for us is the pace at which we've been able to find funding for these pilots, which really points to the fact that there is a real need for the type of capability that we're offering.

Yeah, incredible demand.

Yeah. Great. Thank you.

Thanks, Mike.

Thank you all for your questions. That is all the time we have for Q&A today, so I will pass the conference over to Will Marshall for closing remarks.

Yeah I'll just close by saying that we feel very strong about the position for the year ahead. Obviously you saw the significant growth in the government sector in particular. We're very pleased with the platform launch and the fact that that has enabled a low-fuss approach to getting towards our commercial business. And now we're just focused on operational efficiency and the big deals that are in front of us and closing them. I'm very proud of the team and where we’ve come into the last quarter. Thanks very much and see you next time.

That will conclude today's conference call. Thank you all for your participation. You may now disconnect your line.