Earnings Labs

PennantPark Investment Corporation (PNNT)

Q2 2024 Earnings Call· Thu, May 9, 2024

$4.64

+2.09%

Key Takeaways · AI generated
AI summary not yet generated for this transcript. Generation in progress for older transcripts; check back soon, or browse the full transcript below.

Same-Day

-1.49%

1 Week

-1.22%

1 Month

+3.92%

vs S&P

-1.25%

Transcript

Operator

Operator

Good afternoon, and welcome to the PennantPark Investment Corporation's Second Fiscal Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. Today's conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Mr. Art Penn, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PennantPark Investment Corporation. Mr. Penn, you may begin your conference.

Arthur Penn

Analyst

Good afternoon, everyone. I'd like to welcome you to PennantPark Investment Corporation's Second Fiscal Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. I'm joined today by Rick Allorto, our Chief Financial Officer. Rick, please start off by disclosing some general conference call information and include a discussion about forward-looking statements.

Richard Allorto

Analyst

Thank you, Art. I'd like to remind everyone that today's call is being recorded. Please note that this call is the property of PennantPark Investment Corporation and that any unauthorized broadcast of this call in any form is strictly prohibited. An audio replay of the call will be available on our website. I'd also like to call your attention to the customary safe harbor disclosures in our press release regarding forward-looking information. Today's conference call may also include forward-looking statements and projections, and we ask that you refer to our most recent filings with the SEC for important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these projections. We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements unless required by law. To obtain copies of our latest SEC filings, please visit our website at pennantpark.com or call us at (212) 905-1000. At this time, I'd like to turn the call back to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Art Penn.

Arthur Penn

Analyst

Thanks, Rick. We're going to spend a few minutes and comment on the current market environment for private middle market credit, provide a summary of how we fared in the quarter ended March 31, how the portfolio is positioned for the upcoming quarters, a detailed review of the financials and then open it up for Q&A. For the quarter ended March 31, our GAAP and core net investment income was $0.22 per share. We are pleased to announce that the Board of Directors has approved an increase in the monthly dividend to $0.08 per share. The increase will be effective beginning with the June monthly dividend, which will be payable on July 1 to shareholders of record as of June 14. This represents a 14% increase in the monthly dividend. GAAP and adjusted NAV increased 0.5% to $7.69 per share from $7.65. As of March 31, our portfolio grew slightly to $1.2 billion or 2% from the prior quarter. During the quarter, we continue to originate attractive investment opportunities and invested $188 million in 6 new and 43 existing portfolio companies at a weighted average yield of 11.7%. For the investments in new portfolio companies, the weighted average debt-to-EBITDA was 4.3x. The weighted average interest coverage was 2.1x and the weighted average loan to value was 40%. We added 2 new investments to nonaccrual status and removed on investment. Nonaccruals represent 3.7% of the portfolio at cost and 3% at market value. For the quarter ended March 31, PIK income remained low at only 2.9% of total investment income, which we believe is among the lowest in the BDC sector. As of March 31, the portfolio's weighted average leverage ratio through our debt security was 4.4x, and the portfolio's weighted average interest coverage was 2.2x. These attractive credit statistics are…

Richard Allorto

Analyst

Thank you, Art. For the quarter ended March 31, GAAP and core net investment income was $0.22 per share. Operating expenses for the quarter were as follows: interest and credit facility expenses were $11.9 million, base management and incentive fees were $7.2 million, general and administrative expenses were $1.9 million and provision for excise taxes were $0.8 million. For the quarter ended March 31, net realized and unrealized change on our investments and debt, including provision for taxes, was a gain of $1.8 million or $0.03 per share. As of March 31, our GAAP and adjusted NAV was $7.69 per share, which is up 0.5% from $7.65 per share in the prior quarter. As of March 31, our debt-to-equity ratio was 1.4x, and our capital structure is diversified across multiple funding sources, including both secured and unsecured debt. As of March 31, our key portfolio statistics were as follows: our portfolio remains highly diversified with 138 companies across 30 different industries, the weighted average yield on our debt investments was 12.5%, PIK income equaled only 2.9% of total investment income, we had 2 nonaccruals, which represent 3.7% of the portfolio at cost and 3% at market value. The portfolio is comprised about 58% first lien secured debt, 5% second lien secured debt, 10% subordinated notes to PSLF, 4% other subordinated debt, 6% equity in PSLF and 17% in other preferred and common equity. 97% of the debt portfolio is floating rate. Debt to EBITDA on the portfolio is 4.4x and interest coverage is 2.2x. Now let me turn the call back to Art.

Arthur Penn

Analyst

Thanks, Rick. In closing, I'd like to thank our dedicated and talented team of professionals for their continued commitment to PNNT and its shareholders. Thank you all for your time today and for your continued investment and confidence in us. That concludes our remarks. At this time, I would like to open up the call to questions.

Operator

Operator

[Operator Instructions] And we will go ahead and take our first question from Brian Mckenna with Citizens JMP.

Brian Mckenna

Analyst

All right. I just had one question on the dividend and coverage. So great to see the 14% increase in the monthly distribution, but that equates to $0.24 on a quarterly basis. And so probably looking at NII in the period that came in at $0.22. So I'm curious, why set the new dividend above the 1Q NII run rate? Does that imply you expect some healthy growth in core earnings moving forward? And ultimately, where do you think you'll shake down on dividend coverage over the next several quarters?

Arthur Penn

Analyst

Yes. Thanks, Brian. It's a good question. First, it's important for everyone to know we have a lot of spillover, probably about $1 a share of spillover that we're going to need to be to pay out a significant portion of that anyway. Now then you turn to what's our recurring ongoing NII. And we believe that based on the performance of the portfolio based on continued growth of the joint venture that, that $0.24 is achievable on a recurring basis anyway. So that led us to -- those 2 factors are the key factors that led us to the dividend increase.

Operator

Operator

And our next question will come from Robert Dodd with Raymond James.

Robert Dodd

Analyst

Can you give us a rundown on Flock, obviously, the nonaccrual, on what your -- the situation there is there and what your plans are. I mean, at what point does it make sense for a business like that, that's a lending business to just keep it as a portfolio of company, run it and operate it as a specialty finance lease business yourself?

Arthur Penn

Analyst

Yes. So the company's name is Flock Financial, and it's involved -- it's a specialty finance company involved in financing and purchasing busted consumer receivables. It's an area that Robert, you, focus on as well as BDCs. We think it's a really interesting vintage where we recapitalized the company. We converted some debt to equity, and we put some more capital in to fuel the growth of the company because we think it's a very good vintage for that space to be adding on assets and growing that company. So we're going to grow the company. We've added excellent management to that team. And you're right, once you kind of get that company in a good position, it's a company that we could sell. It's a company that we could hold, it certainly generates a very attractive yield. So first things first, we got to get the company on the right track. We've reconstituted management, brought some ex managers in back into the company, added some board oversight and put some capital into the company so that they can deploy into this attractive market. That was the biggest nonaccural. We also put Walker Edison, which is a much smaller position that's been marked down for a number of quarters. We proactively put that on nonaccrual as well.

Robert Dodd

Analyst

Understood. Just on Flock, at what point do you think Flock, one way or the other, whatever the path is, could -- what point do you think that capital could become income producing?

Arthur Penn

Analyst

Certainly, we think within the next year, that's our goal. We think it's kind of a -- we're building in a one-year horizon to start clicking yield again. Again, we've added to the management. We just want to kind of get things stabilized and then also moving in the right direction with growth.

Robert Dodd

Analyst

Got it. I appreciate that. On the JV, obviously, the same kind of assets are on balance sheet. You still want -- you want to -- still want to grow that. It is an extremely attractive return on capital through that structure. Can you give us an update on how -- obviously, it depends on the market environment, but how large would you like that to be, say, a year from now?

Arthur Penn

Analyst

Yes. So as of March 31, it was $924 million. Based on -- with the current capital, we can get that to $1.1 billion. And we are in discussions about potentially growing that joint venture, and we're open to doing other JVs. It's been a terrific structure for PNNT. It's been a good structure for PFLT. When you're generating an upper teens return consistently, it's something that we like. It's very good for shareholders. We're managing more assets. We're not increasing our base fees. So it's attractive yield and returns for shareholders on a cost-efficient basis. So we're going to look to potentially upsize this JV and who knows, maybe we'll do other JVs over time.

Operator

Operator

And moving on to Mickey Schleien with Ladenburg.

Mickey Schleien

Analyst

Art, just to follow up on the JV. You've already funded your commitments to the capital structure of the JV. Pantheon still has some unfunded commitment this target of $1.1 billion, does that assume Pantheon finishes funding their commitment? And what's stopping that from occurring?

Arthur Penn

Analyst

Yes. It's a good question and Rick may know off the top. I think we've all funded. If we haven't funded, we're going to be all funding shortly. Right now, it's a 60/40 split between PNNT and Pantheon. So we're a quarter or max 2 quarters away of capping out to that $1.1 billion. And then the question is, is that where we stand or do we upside? Do we do another JV? So all options are on the table. Clearly, we like the structure. Pantheon's a terrific partner, by the way. And we're optimistic that we can do more over time.

Mickey Schleien

Analyst

So Art, as that JV grows, how are you going to manage the nonqualified asset bucket, which is already at 22%?

Arthur Penn

Analyst

Yes. So we're constantly watching the 30% bucket. You may see that at quarter end, we've been purchasing T bills on the balance sheet of PNNT, which is qualifying assets, which can help expand the 30% bucket.

Mickey Schleien

Analyst

Okay. I appreciate that. And the leverage of the JV is running around 2x. Is that where you want to see it? That's counting the notes to the members as debt. Is that about where you want it to be?

Arthur Penn

Analyst

Notes to the members, we -- it's all part of the junior capital. So we're kind of looking at 2:1, $2 of external debt to $1 of junior capital, which would include the subordinated notes that we and Pantheon own along with the equity. So to us, that's junior capital and we leverage that 2: 1 or so.

Operator

Operator

And the next question will come from Mark Hughes with Truist.

Mark Hughes

Analyst

Yes. Thank you. I think you've addressed a lot of this. I was going to just ask about the sustainability of returns in the JV. You talked about high teens here recently. Is that something that's sustainable with that structure, just assuming kind of the reasonable returns in the underlying investments?

Arthur Penn

Analyst

Yes. We believe it is. Obviously, if rates come down, if and when rates come down, yields will. These are floating rate assets, of course, yields will come down. We do finance the JV with floating rate liabilities, either credit facilities or floating rate securitization CLO financing. So it's matched, albeit when rates are higher, you get a higher ROE. And then, of course, it's about credit performance. And can we continue to have very strong credit performance. I think we can. The portfolio -- as a senior portfolio that we do here is well constructed conservatively underwritten I think we've been sharing with you that the senior loans we're doing today are 4.3x debt-to-EBITDA was last quarter, interest coverage of 2.1x and loan to value of about 40%. So that's kind of what's populating that joint venture and then we leverage that with the floating rate credit facilities and the floating rate securitization. So we're optimistic, although if rates come down, it may be hard to retain that. And of course, we got to keep underwriting credit well and try to minimize the nonaccruals.

Operator

Operator

And we'll take a question from Casey Alexander with Compass Point.

Casey Alexander

Analyst

I'm just curious, in the schedule of investments, Flock is listed as a sub-debt position. So I'm just kind of curious why you guys -- who is ahead of you? And why would it be you guys who is making the decision to put management in?

Arthur Penn

Analyst

Yes. So great question. So this is a specialty finance company. Regions Bank is the senior lender. We are mezzanine lender, subordinated debt. As part of the restructuring, we're converting some of the mezzanine debt to equity, and we're doing some additional mezzanine debt, which is junior to Regions Bank. So this was a nonsponsored deal. So it was a founder that was running the company. And when the company needed extra liquidity, we're the ones who provide the liquidity. And between the liquidity you provided, and the conversion of debt to equity, we're in a majority equity position.

Casey Alexander

Analyst

Okay. Great. That's excellent color. Just as a matter of course, is there any Flock or Walker Edison that is also in the JV?

Arthur Penn

Analyst

I think -- no, actually, no. There's no Walker Edison in the JV or Flock.

Casey Alexander

Analyst

Okay. Great. And lastly, I think you mentioned it, but I think I wished it. What was the company that came off nonaccrual in the quarter?

Arthur Penn

Analyst

Yes. The company historically was called MailSouth. Its name changed to Mspark. It's been marked at 0 for the last few quarters. It got sold, and we realized that 0, unfortunately. But it's now off the SOIBs, the company got sold.

Operator

Operator

And moving on to Kyle Joseph with Jefferies.

Kyle Joseph

Analyst

I apologies if I missed this, but just wanted to get a sense for competition and spreads. It looks like your yields for the quarter were fairly stable. Just give us a sense of what base rates versus spreads there and it looks like the yields on new investments were a little lower. But just kind of been hearing kind of mixed messages about banks either exiting or entering the space and just kind of what you're seeing in terms of competition.

Arthur Penn

Analyst

Yes. It's a good question, Kyle, and we did not cover that earlier. Spreads have contracted about 50 basis points over the last 6 to 9 months in the core middle market, which is where we focus under $50 million of EBITDA, and that's just what the market has been. The M&A flow has been a little light. We've been busy, as you can tell, a lot of our business comes from both new platforms and existing companies, but spreads have tightened a bit to average 550 over the risk-free rate in our space, that along with what we think are attractive credit statistics like 4.3x debt-to-EBITDA, interest coverage of 2.1x, loan-to-value of 40%. So we still think those credit stats along with, call it, 550 over risk-free rate average is very attractive, very attractive risk reward. Unclear what happens between now and year-end. We are optimistic. We believe there's going to be a lot of activity between now and year-end, a lot of deal flow. And there may be a scenario where supply demand widens spreads again, no guarantees, but you can certainly see that if a lot of supply hits the market, which we think is a possibility, spreads may widen again. But either way, we're -- most important for us is we are credit-oriented. We're focused on credit, and we're okay taking a little lower yield if the credit is well underwritten.

Operator

Operator

And that does conclude the question-and-answer session. I'll now turn the conference back over to Mr. Art Penn.

Arthur Penn

Analyst

Thanks, everybody, for participating. We really appreciate it. Next time we'll be doing the call in early August for the June 30 quarter. In the meantime, wishing everybody a terrific spring and summer. Speak soon.

Operator

Operator

That does conclude today's conference. We do thank you for your participation. Have an excellent day.