Good morning. My name is Phillis, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Q2 Holdings Second Quarter 2021 Financial Results Conference Call. Thank you. I would now like to turn the call over to Josh Yankovich, Investor Relations. Sir, please begin.

Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for our second quarter 2021 conference call. With me on the call today is Matt Flake, our CEO; and David Mehok, our CFO. This call contains forward-looking statements that are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including the future operating and financial performance of Q2 Holdings. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by these forward-looking statements, and we can give no assurance that such expectations or any of our forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements are included in our periodic reports filed with the SEC, including our most recent quarterly report on Form 10-Q and subsequent filings and the press release distributed yesterday afternoon regarding the financial results we will discuss today. Forward-looking statements that we make on this call are based on assumptions only as of the date discussed. Investors should not assume that these statements will remain operative at a later time, and we undertake no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements discussed in this call. Also, unless otherwise stated, all financial measures discussed on this call will be on a non-GAAP basis. A discussion of why we use non-GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP measures is included in our press release, which may be found on the Investor Relations section of our website and in our Form 8-K filed with the SEC yesterday afternoon. Let me now turn the call over to Matt.

Thanks, Josh. I’ll start today’s call by sharing our second quarter results and highlights from across the business. I’ll then turn it over to David to discuss our financial results in more detail as well as guidance for the third quarter and updated full year 2021. In the second quarter, we generated non-GAAP revenue of $124.2 million, up 26% year-over-year and 6% sequentially. We also added over 500,000 users sequentially, resulting in a year-over-year increase of 16%. That brings us to more than 18.8 million total registered users on our digital banking platform. Overall, we had an encouraging quarter of activity across the business. We signed key deals across our product lines, announced an important new offering that we believe will build on our competitive advantage in the market. And we continue to execute at a high level in delivering our solutions. Although we continue to see uncertainty around the timing of purchasing decisions, we believe that a return to more normalized living and working conditions will help the market improve, which we are already beginning to see by an increase in customer evaluations of digital solutions and growth in our pipeline. So we’re pleased that we’re seeing expansion in the number of opportunities across all areas of our business. And as we look ahead to the back half of the year, we are optimistic that overall deal activity in the space will begin to return to pre-pandemic levels. We also saw a resurgence in M&A activity within the banking space in the first half of the year, which we view as a positive for our business. Of the 22 mergers or acquisitions announced in the first half that involved a Q2 digital banking customer, we were on the acquiring side in all but one instance. This reinforces a belief…

Thanks, Matt, and good morning, everyone. As we hit the halfway mark of the year, we’re pleased with our execution and effectively bringing deals to revenue and our ability to deliver organic growth in the business, which has helped yield strong overall revenue growth, exceeding the high end of our guidance. We continue to grow investments in our solutions, support, delivery and people while driving efficiencies, which have resulted in adjusted EBITDA, also exceeding the high end of our guidance. I’ll begin by reviewing our results for the second quarter of 2021 in more detail and conclude with updated guidance for the third quarter and full year 2021. Total non-GAAP revenue for the first quarter was $124.2 million, an increase of 26% year-over-year and up 6% sequentially. Both the year-over-year and sequential increase in revenue was largely the results of growth in subscription revenue, driven by new customer go-lives and organic user growth. In addition, the year-over-year increase was also due in part to go-lives associated with cross-sold products. Year-over-year and sequential revenue growth also benefited from the contribution of ClickSWITCH, which we acquired on April 1. Transactional revenue represented 14% of total revenue for the quarter, consistent with the prior year period and previous quarter. Within transactional revenue, we’re seeing an increasing contribution associated with the BaaS business, which includes interchange as well as pass-through fees for debit transactions. This increase in revenue from the BaaS business, combined with continued slowing growth in traditional bill pay revenue has resulted in transactional revenue as a percentage of total revenue remaining constant. Turning to backlog. We ended the quarter with approximately $1.3 billion in total backlog, a 4% increase year-over-year and a sequential decline of $15 million. The year-over-year increase in backlog was largely result of bookings added through renewal opportunities…

Thanks, David. In closing, we continue to see signs of improved business momentum. We had important sales wins across our lines of business, adding strategic new clients in digital banking, loan origination and pricing and banking-as-a-service, while continuing to expand existing relationships and execute on cross-pollination opportunities. We continue to further differentiate our solution portfolio with products like Q2 Innovation Studio, which enable financial institutions to design, develop and distribute innovative solutions to their end users more quickly than ever before. Looking ahead, we’re encouraged that our market is beginning to improve. We’re engaged in more and more sales opportunities creating a strong pipeline, and we expect prospect and customer decision-making time lines to improve through the end of the year. Thank you. And with that, I’ll turn it over to the operator for questions.

Your first question comes from the line of Tom Roderick with Stifel.

Matt, I wanted to kind of -- maybe put a little bit of a finer point on the backdrop of the business environment here. I mean I’m looking at the numbers they’re very good. You’re beating expectations, you’re raising guidance and a lot to be excited about there. But it did seem like perhaps in your comments, you’re pushing a little bit of caution and maybe that’s just near-term decision-making versus the pipeline building and things of that nature. And then David, I’m just trying to marry that to backlog that would be down sequentially. So can you put a little bit of a finer point on what you’re seeing with respect to new deal activity and the pace of decision-making versus what’s in the pipeline and enthusiasm for what might be coming in the second half?

Yes. Thanks, Tom. So we are being cautious about -- this is our fifth quarter, I guess, in the pandemic, and we’ve had to adjust and deal with the distractions that come with that. But we are beginning to see -- we had a good quarter. If you look at it as an enterprise deal, 2 Tier 1s had a really a Tier 2 on the digital banking side that looked like a -- resemble a small Tier 1. So there’s good activity, had some wins. But at the end of the day, we’re beginning to see people coalesce around decisions in the Tier 1 space and the Tier 2 space on the digital banking side. It’s also starting to come together on the lending side as well in North America. So it’s just -- it’s kind of, I guess, 5 quarters of explaining that we’re in a pandemic and trying to be cautious, but it certainly feels like we’re beginning to see some decisions come together in the back half, as I said in the prepared remarks, should look like pre pandemic numbers, and we’re hoping to build on the momentum from that into ‘22. So just trying to be cautious and transparent with what’s going on, like we’ve always been but it feels like things are starting to come together. I’m only going to do this once, but I got to put the delta variant caution out there. So -- and whether it’s that or the response to it, and that will be different depending on the geographies you’re in, but that would be the only thing that I would say I can’t forecast that piece. But it feels really good. I like the activity that we have, the pipeline numbers just because I’m sure they’re going to come up. We’re up 36% -- our demos were up 36% from the fourth quarter of last year, we’re looking at much better numbers. RFPs are up 14% sequentially, 40% over the fourth quarter of ‘20. So we’re beginning to see that activity come together. I feel like we’re well positioned in a lot of the deals, and we’re also -- we continue to talk about this expansion opportunity within the existing base of customers that we’ve built. So all of those things feel good. Just want to have the pandemic caution that we’re going to get back to what normal looks like or pre-pandemic looks like. So it looks good. David?

Yes, Tom. And on the backlog side of things, we talked last quarter a little bit about the fact that we thought backlog would be pressured this year, we saw an unprecedented number of renewals. We renewed about 1/3 of our customers last year ends. When you look at the mix of renewals of bookings overall. Historically, if you go pre-pandemic, we’ve had approximately 2/3 to 3/4 of our new bookings coming from either new business or cross-sell. That was down close to 50% last year. So what we’re seeing now is we’re back in that pre-pandemic historical range. So we feel good about how the business is trajecting at this point, but that’s sort of some of the drivers of backlog. With the CARES program and some of the renewals we did last year, we certainly feel like this year is going to be a little bit pressured from a backlog standpoint.

Yes, makes good sense. That’s really helpful. One quick follow-up. So the banking-as-a-service, the BaaS piece it’s hard not to be enthusiastic when you talk about some of these different wins in different verticals. I think last quarter, you talked about Credit Karma. At what point does this start to move into a place where it impacts the numbers a little bit more? And I guess even in particular, David, I’d ask you about the gross margins because I think about pass-through and interchange those seem to be sort of pure margin. So it would seem like you’ve got the pieces on the chessboard and sort of just waiting for the transactions to turn on a little bit. What drives that? And when do we sort of start to see an impact that might even start to move gross margins up a little bit.

Yes, Tom, it’s a good analogy actually with chess because it isn’t checkers, this is going to take longer to play out. But the way that this typically transpires is we win one of these opportunities when they launched the program. We talked about that pretty extensively last quarter. When these programs are launched, what’s going to happen is there’s going to be a decent amount of pass-through fees that we have. And so those are obviously low margin, in fact, no margin. And then once those pass-through fees happen, you start to see a gradual increase in mix over time of interchange fees, which are going to be based upon the transactions that are taking place with the cards that are issued. We saw the program launches that we had referenced happen in Q2, and we’re obviously still seeing it now. So there’s a larger percentage now of those pass-through fees happening. But over time, we feel like we’re going to have a much more meaningful lift to gross margins associated with the interchange fees, but it is going to be a 2- to 3-year time horizon as we start to see this become more and more meaningful. It’s not something that’s going to happen over the course of a few months or even a few quarters.

Your next question comes from the line of Terry Tillman with Truist Securities.

Matt, it’s always good to hear about new innovation. And so I would love to hear a little bit more about the Innovation Studio. Is this kind of like a low-code framework? And just a little bit more about the studio technology and the monetization? And then I had a follow-up for David.

Yes. Terry, thanks for the question. For us, really excited about it. This isn’t something we did last quarter. We’ve been working on this for quite some time. If you think about it, it really does four things for us and our clients, in particular. #1 speed to market allows us to get -- they’re able to get whatever technology they want integrated up and running faster, whether we do it, they do it or a third party does it. That helps drive differentiation and unique experiences to their users, whatever it might be, whether it’s for a business function or retail function. So you’re driving a unique experience that allows them to drive their brand. Third thing is driving more engagement. It will drive more utilization of the product. It will drive more logins, more activity, different activity. It could be accounting software, it could be payables, it could be CRM that we’re going to integrate to. And on the technology side, it’s basically SDK, it’s open to third parties to work with. But one of the parts that’s very interesting here is the revenue piece, which is, there is a revenue share that goes on between the providers, the financial institution and us. And so we are moving this model from I’m going to extract as much money as possible out of a bank or a credit union, which we are trying to help exist, compete and differentiate and be a part of this economy to now we are talking about how much revenue where we are going to split from products that they’re selling to their customers or they’re generating revenue from. So as others are really pushing to drive ARPU up by selling more products and taking more money from their clients, our conversations have shifted to, we can help you generate revenue, which is very important in this interest rate environment that we’re in, noninterest income, it gets the CEO’s ears. So very excited about this. It’s early, but there’s a lot of activity in it and a very strong reception to it in the marketplace. So very excited about it.

That sounds great. It sounds like it’s competition to Jonathan’s BaaS business here, a healthy competition.

Jonathan is overall, the emerging market stuff. So he’s saying he’s going to compete with himself on it.

Yes. Then I just had a quick follow-up for David. Can you -- the deal closed in April with ClickSWITCH, I totally understand the value prop for the banks and credit unions. But if you could shed any more light on just kind of the size of the business or what it did in the quarter. And then when you do these new deals like for things like ClickSWITCH or even in the past Gro, is that a notably faster time to revenue recognition versus just a big digital banking or lending deal?

Yes, Terry. Good to hear from me and absolutely, there’s a much quicker time to revenue for a business like ClickSWITCH. And we had given you some of the guidance when we closed ClickSWITCH that we thought this was going to be for this year, it was going to be low to mid-single digits in terms of revenue contribution and low to mid-single-digit negative EBITDA for the year. We still believe that’s the case. One proof point of success is we’ve seen a few dozen ClickSWITCH opportunities enter the pipeline for our existing digital banking customers. So we’re really pleased with the activity that we’re seeing right now and the ability to cross-sell that solution into our existing base.

Your next question comes from the line of Sterling Auty with JP Morgan.

So I want to go back to Tom Roderick’s question kind of ask it this way. How should we think about -- traditionally, we listen for win, especially Tier 1 wins, think about 9 to 12 months off for implementation, and that’s when you get the revenue contribution, maybe reacceleration in revenue. With the decline in backlog and all the elements you talked about 5 quarters into the pandemic, how should we think about the potential as we move forward? And within the context, you’ve only given guidance -- limited guidance, but what should we be looking for on our side to indicate when we might see a reacceleration of the top line? Should it be when backlog starts to grow again? Or is there any other indicators we should look for?

Sterling, it’s David. And what I’d say in answer to that question is, first and foremost, remember, and you stated this, it takes about 3 to 5 quarters from bookings to revenue. So that creates a natural revenue air pocket, we’re just now starting to work through. And as Matt mentioned, we’ve had 5 straight quarters of COVID impacted demand. So the improved bookings environment that we’re expecting in the second half, that’s really going to benefit our revenue trajectory in ‘23. So what you’re going to start to see is improved backlog over the course of a period of time, not quarter-to-quarter, with the mix of new becoming more and more, which we’ve already stated, we’re seeing an improvement in that mix in the first half of the year relative to last year. And then obviously, that starts to manifest itself into revenue trajectory, the end of ‘22 and more importantly, into ‘23.

All right. Understood. And then one follow-up. When you talk about the Top-30 bank loan origination win -- loan origination for some investors is hard to wrap their head around because you’ve got mortgage loan origination, all these other pieces. You’ve got different players from the old Ellie Maes to the Encinos, where does this fit in? So what are the vendors that you’ve competed against if you’re willing to name them or at least conceptually tell us who you’re competing against for that type of business. And how might you be able to extrapolate to more wins moving forward?

Yes. So Sterling, this was a leasing opportunity. So they do lease -- this is a leasing division of the bank where they roll out leasing products to their customers. The competition was both internal and external. I don’t need to go through the names, they can do it themselves. And so for us, it’s just a matter of you go -- we have a pretty strong leasing book on the Cloud Lending side internationally. And so for us, it’s just an opportunity for us to expand within the financial institution. We also sold ClickSWITCH to that same entity at the same time. So it’s a way to get your foot in the door and sell more and more of it. And a lot of these financial institutions are in leasing and doing more and more leasing. So it’s an opportunity there, but it’s a workflow that we put in front of them from the ability to originate the lease from the borrower all the way to the bank to simplify the process.

Your next question comes from the line of Brian Peterson with Raymond James.

So Matt, it was kind of an interesting point on what you mentioned on M&A, where a lot of your customers want the acquiring in. I’m curious how quickly do they make kind of IT or vendor decisions post that M&A. Is that something that you’d expect in the second half? Or does that get pushed into 2022? I’m just curious how quickly those decisions are made as we think about kind of the revenue and backlog impact.

Yes, Brian, thanks for the question. It’s -- It was something we’ve never really gotten into it, but we looked at the data, 22 acquisitions, and we were the buyer on 21, total customer base, it was a little bit more than 50, and we were the buyer on all but 3. So that’s -- and as you work into different products, it may have a different impact. But the thing that the top line on that or the headline on that is our customers, our strategic customers thinking about growth of our top -- of our Tier 1 customers, 20 of them have grown into becoming Tier 1s through acquisitions. And so this is a pattern that we think what we’re going to see continue to happen. So as far as when you see that hit the revenue line for us, it’s really tricky because you have regulatory approval you’ve got to go through some banks want to do it as soon as it gets approved, they want to do the conversion. Some banks want to sit and wait and figure out how to put these together. And the larger they are, the longer they take to consolidate these systems. But I think the point is this is just a tailwind for us that creates more opportunity within the base to go cross sell more products and expand. And I think your time to revenue is probably going to look at anywhere between 12 to 18 months from the announcement of it. If it’s a really small one, obviously, we won’t have that big of an impact. It will happen a little faster. But a really interesting stat that we found, and I don’t know that there’s many other vendors that could tap those numbers.

And Brian, the only other thing I’d add is it also gives us an opportunity to sit down with the customer and extend the existing contractual duration one. And then two, there’s opportunities as well a cross-sell at that point.

Exactly, exactly. That’s kind of what I was getting to there. So that’s great to hear. But maybe a follow-up for me, Matt, I know you gave a lot of comments on the second half and some optimism there. I’m curious, the third quarter typically isn’t as big of a bookings period as the fourth quarter. COVID seasonality kind of gets thrown out the window, right? But any clarity on what you’re expecting kind of third quarter versus fourth quarter, understanding that we’re still trying to figure this all out here.

Yes. I mean that’s typically true. I would anticipate a bigger fourth than third quarter. But I feel good about where things are in the third quarter. I think you’ll see on the digital banking side, I think you’ll see more deals going down. I would anticipate more activity in the Tier 1 side of things, hopeful we could get 1 or 2 of those by the end of the year. So there’s a lot of good activity there. We’re going to continue the path of 7 years of doing this and under promise and over deliver on those. But I feel very good about the pipeline, where we are in deals, both in Tier 1, Tier 2 and even some Tier 3 stuff. And then on the lending and the BaaS side of the business, there’s a lot of interesting things happening there as well. So it -- your point around the third quarter is a little tricky. I think it’s probably the biggest vacation summer in the history of summers or at least in my lifetime, that somebody’s gone when you’re trying to get a deal done. But ultimately, I think they’re all going to return here in the coming weeks, and we’ll start to get some of these deals wrapped up. But I feel good about our pipeline and the activity and then where we are in the decision-making cycles. And I think you’re going to see a strong back half of this year from us.

Your next question comes from the line of Robert Napoli with William Blair.

Maybe just a follow up. I know we’ve beat around this quite a bit. But what is -- as you look into 2022 with your backlog, the trend in your backlog currently, and I think you’re suggesting we’ll see different numbers by the end of the year. How confident are you in attaining your organic growth targets in 2022 on the top line, if you would. And which products are adding most to that? Is it -- is it BaaS? Is it PrecisionLender or Cloud Lending? Or is it going to be just the pure digital banking piece?

Yes. Bob, it’s David. And just to sort of add a little bit more color on my earlier comment about that. We are really looking forward to seeing the second half trajectory, but we have to keep in mind that this -- the time to delivery is an important variable to factor in. And the long-term growth framework that we put in place, we still believe in that long-term growth framework, but that’s over a period of time. And when you have air pockets like this, you can see a period of 3 or this case, 3 to 5 quarters, where you do have some compressed growth. But what you end up seeing is a reacceleration from that once you work through that air pocket. So as you know, we’re not giving guidance at this point in time for ‘22, but we do think it’s important to make sure you understand the flow of revenue from bookings and the fact that we’re just now seeing a reacceleration coming out of the COVID-impacted quarters. So as you’re thinking about how this trends over the next couple of years, that’s going to -- those are going to be important variables to factor in.

Okay. And then just on the gross margin, again, the BaaS -- the transaction revenue, the interchange, are you recognizing that gross or net? I mean if it’s gross, that would, I guess, that would pressure gross margin, if it’s net, it would be accretive.

It’s gross, Bob. And that’s why we called it out in the prepared remarks in regards to gross margin because it did have an impact on some gross margin compression. Again, it’s a good thing overall because it shows that these programs are launching effectively. Cards are getting out in the hands of the end users and eventually, they’re going to transact on those cards. But it does have a short-term impact.

And then just lastly, on PrecisionLender, if you could give any update there? And how that’s progressing, not only in the U.S., but I think Europe internationally is a huge opportunity. But any changes or any commentary around how PrecisionLender is doing?

Yes. No, they had a really good quarter considering they did the 2 Tier 1 wins in the quarter. I like the pipeline that continues to be very active. The existing customers, there’s growth in the cross-sell side of things. I would anticipate us having a little more consistency quarter after quarter after 2020 in North America on PL, the pipeline looks good. Europe is still lagging maybe we get one in, in the back half of the year, in Asia is as well. So those places are just -- they’re just behind where we are in North America, but very optimistic about the PL pipeline and the activity that we’re seeing. And also, it’s beginning to become part of net new deals that we’re signing as well as part of the cross-sell motions that we’re putting out there. So very pleased with it. The team is doing a great job, and it’s such a differentiated product, but I think you’re just going to continue to see growth in that business.

Your next question comes from the line of Andrew Schmidt with Citi.

I was hoping you could elaborate a little bit on the impact of gross margin. Talk a little bit about the investments you’re making there? Is it technology infrastructure? Is it delivery teams. A little more color on the investments on that line would be helpful.

Andrew, good to hear from you. Yes, so there’s a few pockets of investments there. One is invest to grow. Obviously, that’s investing in the technology stack and the capabilities. A lot of focus on the data solutions that we have, which is what our customers are asking for, a lot of focus on the customer experience. But what we’re doing is also investing the scale. And what I mean by that is finding ways that we can invest to have long-term benefits to our overall margin profile. As an example, we’re investing in ways to have continuous automated delivery. And what that means essentially is we’re going to be able to upgrade customers in a much more seamless fashion, reducing the workload by north of 50%. So it does require some short-term investments, and we’re seeing that right now flowing through the P&L. But as we start to get into next year and the following years, we feel we’re going to scale much more effectively in regards to things like delivery and you start to see the benefits of these investments at that point in time.

Got it. Very helpful. And then on the Cloud Lending side, give to see the big win marquee win should help from a pipeline perspective. But has anything changed there from a go-to-market perspective, from a product capability perspective or simply a function of just getting the marquee clients and continue to build the pipe.

I mean we continue to enhance the product. We’re doing a lot of integration into the digital banking platform. You think about treasury onboarding that is resonating with our prospects and customers, how do you make it easier for our corporate customer to become -- to move from a competing bank to your bank or credit union to your credit union, it’s highly differentiated. Other people don’t have it, where it integrates the digital banking solution. You tie it in with PrecisionLender, it makes for a very compelling offering. So we’re continuing to build out asset classes, feature functions and making sure that it’s tying together with our entire suite that manages both sides of the balance sheet for the bank or credit union. So just continue to invest in it. We’re taking customers live. We had a couple of really nice go-lives in the quarter on the Cloud Lending Solution for commercial or small business and commercial functionality. So just continue to make progress one step at a time and really happy with the team and the progress they’re making there.

Your next question comes from the line of Matthew VanVliet with BTIG.

I wanted to ask about the BaaS business. It sounds like there’s been a little bit of an expansion in terms of what the end user is after, obviously, the NYDIG announcement was interesting on the Bitcoin side. But curious in terms of how wide of a net you’re sort of casting on that opportunity? What kind of maybe less banking-focused types of fintechs are getting involved in wanting to at least add some services on the banking side? And then in addition to that, on some of these neobanks, are you having the lending conversations with them as they try to get into a more full suite of solutions?

Thanks, Matt. For us, last year, I think we pointed out that we were -- we had an environment where the smaller fintechs that are starting up and a little -- maybe just trying to get their sea legs. We have them going into our sandbox, and it’s a very lightweight piece. So we’re still doing those deals, but we’re not focused on that as much, those are inbound for us as much as Tier 1s and then others that blue chip companies that may not be in -- may not be a bank, it may be an embedded finance place. So you can look at HR, payroll, retailers, of all different sorts that we’re talking with on the Tier 1 side. So whether it’s brands or Tier 1 fintechs, there’s a lot of activity out there. We have a very unique value prop to these. We have a credible group of references that are large brands that we can use to talk about the products as well as our banking network. So we have really expanded our net to cover more than just banks, fintechs and neobanks, but we’re also chasing some of these Tier 1 players, like I said, that I think could have some really interesting implications for us in ‘22 and beyond. If you think about some of the ones we’ve referenced, their amount of retail customer -- the amount of customers that they have in their marketing and acquisition engines are just incredible. So it’s been obviously, a growth area for us, but the opportunity to expand in the space and our unique value prop is very differentiated, and we’re seeing a lot of good momentum there.

Great. And then on the Centrix side, curious if you could give us some kind of update in terms of the total penetration in your customer base that are using a number of these solutions? Obviously, phishing attempts and other cyber crime is certainly on the rise, unfortunately. But just curious on how much of an attach rate you have there and how frequently that’s coming up in conversations as you go to these renewals and upsell, cross-sell opportunities?

I just want to make sure, you said Centrix.

Yes.

Yes, yes. So Centrix, I don’t know the exact attach rate, I would think we have a couple of hundred. We have partnered with those guys since we started before we even acquired them. So I think we’d have a couple of hundred. But also keep in mind, that our risk and for our data analytics product in 2008 and ‘09 that we rolled out that began looking at commercial transactions to see who you’re paying, when you’re paying, how often you’re paying and the amount is a risk and frog tool that we continue to use, enhance and protects our customers. So all of our risk and fraud technology, whether it’s Centrix or whether it’s our machine learning stuff is top -- it’s one of the top 3 or 4 cross-sells every quarter for us. And with 2020, as people move more digitally, you saw more fraud, unfortunately occur. And so it’s just -- it’s a staple for us in our sales process and it’s just a rock-solid product that we continue to enhance, and the team up in Lincoln just does an incredible job with it. So it’s obviously -- it’s always been important, but even more as more people come online and use the product.

Your next question comes from the line of James Faucette with Morgan Stanley.

This is Jonathan on for James. Appreciate the optimism around the sales environment. Barring anything delta variant related, how are you thinking about potential customer churn as the sales environment improves?

That’s more churn.

Yes.

I think with the -- as far as a logos perspective, from a retention perspective, what we did last year, renewing 1/3 of our customers plus our NPS scores are as high as they’ve been in a while. We’ve just really doubled down on diving in with our customers and solving problems, thinking about how we can strategize together. We had 5 Tier 1 visits, 3 CEOs in this quarter -- in the second quarter that came to see us and talk about strategy and direction. So I feel good about our churn number as far as the revenue churn number, it should be in line, 5% or 6% like it typically is. And keep in mind, some of that’s M&A, some of that’s product churn. And so feel very good about the -- where we are and excited about the pickup that we anticipate seeing in the back half of this year.

Helpful color. And last one on M&A. Can you walk us through your approach M&A going forward? How are you thinking about valuations in the current environment? And do you think there are still opportunities to be opportunistic with capital allocation?

Absolutely. Yes. We look at a lot of deals that are out there. Valuations are high right now. It just depends on what the product and the opportunity is. If we look at plugging it into our model, whether it’s for lending, whether it’s for digital banking, whether it’s for commercial functionality for data, for retail functionality, all those are opportunities for us, including opportunities maybe on the BaaS side. And so as we continue to think about having the customer base that we have, the M&A environment that we’re seeing our customers doing the M&A and how we’re on the winning side of that so much. The opportunity to go expand within our customers and to build a product set out, whether it’s for deposit side of the house, the lending side of the house are all interesting for us and then the ability to go and cross-sell more into the base is a huge opportunity for us. So we’re evaluating them. We’ll be judicious in that. We’ll be thoughtful in the deals that we do. But there’s nothing to report right now on M&A, but we are active in looking at things that are out there that could add value to the business of our customers. I think that’s all the questions. So thank you, everybody. Hope you have a great day. We look forward to seeing and talking to people during the quarter at the investor conferences.

Thanks, everyone.

Ladies and gentlemen, that does conclude today’s conference call. We thank you for participating. You may now disconnect. Goodbye.