Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Beacon Roofing Supply's Fiscal Year 2014 First Quarter Conference Call. My name is Marquitta, and I will be your coordinator for today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes. This call will contain forward-looking statements that fall within the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding future events and the future financial performance of the company, including the company's financial outlook. Bear in mind that such statements are only predictions, and actual results may differ materially as a result of risks and uncertainties that pertain to our business. These risks are highlighted in our quarterly and annual SEC filings. The forward-looking statements contained in this call are based on information as of today, February 7, 2014, and except as required by law, the company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any of these forward-looking statements. Finally, this call will contain references to certain non-GAAP measures. The reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures is set forth in today's press release. On this call, Beacon Roofing Supply may make forward-looking statements, including statements about its plans and objectives and future economic performance. Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors, including, but not limited to those set forth in the Risk Factors section of the company's latest Form 10-K. The company has posted a summary financial slide presentation on the Investors section of its website under Events & Presentations that will be referenced during management's review of the financial results. On the call today for Beacon Roofing Supply will be Mr. Paul Isabella, President and CEO; and Mr. Joe Nowicki, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Paul Isabella, President and CEO. Please proceed, Mr. Isabella.

Thank you. Good morning, and welcome to our first quarter call. We begin the year by reporting another record sales quarter with revenue of $552 million. The quarter started off with strong sales in October and was impacted by harsh weather in November and December. Despite that, we still ended at a strong 7.5% total growth in the quarter year-over-year. Diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended at $0.30 versus $0.37 in the prior year. This was below our internal expectations, but given the weather conditions and pricing pressure, we feel good about the start of the year. Given the nature of our business, there will always be fluctuations in sales and EPS due to factors such as demand in our markets and weather conditions. Our focus is and always has been on our full year financial outlook and achieving our long-term strategic growth objectives as we work to achieve our monthly and quarterly goals. Q1 gross margin ended at 23% versus 24.7% in 2013. It was also fairly consistent with the 23.1% delivered in Q4. While we see the overall market growing for the full year and are optimistic about future price increases, we did see price down slightly in the quarter, which impacted gross margins. In addition, we saw an increase in the mix of Commercial and Complementary business this quarter, which had a slight negative impact on margins. In the near term, we are working closely with our vendors and are planning spring price increases. We are pleased with the level of cost control exhibited during the quarter. Operating costs within our existing markets ended below 18% of sales and below last year's rate. Costs grew 1.1% versus organic sales growth of 3.3% in the quarter, good leverage and good performance, especially considering that approximately 2%…

Thanks, Paul, and good morning, everyone. Now I'll highlight a little more detail on a few key financial results and metrics that are contained in our earnings press release and also the first quarter slides that were posted to our website this morning. Total sales for the quarter increased 7.5% with a first quarter record of $552 million. $21.6 million of that growth was from prior acquisitions. Our fiscal 2014 first quarter organic sales increased by 3.3%. By product group, the increase was as follows: Residential Roofing sales, up 1.4%; Non-residential Roofing, up 6.6%; and Complementary Product sales, up 1%. Complementary sales trends continue to be encouraging as it further expands on our product diversification. For comparison purposes, there were the same number of days in Q1 2013 as in Q1 of 2014, 62 days. Sales were steady despite an overall colder and wetter quarter. We started out very strong in October, but weather had a significant impact in November and December. In our geographic regions, as Paul described, our Southeast region achieved the highest organic sales growth of almost 21%, while our Midwest region also had an increase of over 12%, and in the West, we saw almost 15% organic growth. As in our prior quarter, our biggest challenge this quarter was gross margin, which decreased to 23% from 24.7% last year. This drove the majority of the unfavorable impact on our year-over-year financial performance. The lower gross margins this quarter due primarily to an increase in the net product costs of our Residential Roofing sales, combined with a slight decrease in our selling price. Overall, average selling prices in comparison to last year's Q4 were down slightly less than 1% due to a challenging pricing environment. The declines were across all lines of business. Existing market operating expenses,…

[Operator Instructions] We'll take our first question from David Manthey with Robert W. Baird. David J. Manthey - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: First off, Paul, when you talk about the October, November, December daily sales growth numbers and then that adding up to 3.3%, by my math, that would only work if each of those months were equally represented across the quarter, and I guess I'm under the impression that October would be a better month for you than December in any quarter. So could you tell us what percentage of the quarter are represented by October, November, December just to get an idea of the weighting?

Yes. I don't have the sales, Dave, in front of me by month. I mean, we did the math, and we know it's correct. And the big weight, of course, was -- Joe's kind of looking it up. The big weight was the 11% gain we had in October and that at least positive in November. December dropped off quite a bit. David J. Manthey - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: But December was only minus 3, is that right?

Yes, yes. David J. Manthey - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: Okay. I guess we'll have to talk about that off-line.

I don't have the numbers in front of me. If we get them as we go through the call, we can shout them out. Joe just kind of pulls them.

Yes. So the sales for the month in October were around $220 million, and in November, $170 million, and in December, around -- it looks like $127 million. That gets you close to -- and again, this is existing market sales, which gets you close to that $520 million, which is the existing market sales right now[ph] . David J. Manthey - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: Okay. I'll have to work the numbers, but I don't think that the -- that those numbers make sense relative to the 11.1% and minus 3% summing to 3%. Just if you weight them by these revenues you just gave me, it would seem like that number in the December month would -- that'd be much, much more down than 3%. But we can take that off-line, I guess.

And I'll be happy to work through it with you, Dave. David J. Manthey - Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, Research Division: Okay. Great. Second question, on the price increases, I guess, the shingle price increases from the manufacturers, and that will have its own track, but I'm wondering about the 5% to 8% price increase you are doing unilaterally, I guess, you said, relative to some of the costs that you have that you're trying to offset. Definitely, it's good that you're showing price leadership here. How confident are you, I mean, in an environment where shingle prices alone have been hard to pass through for the channel? How confident are you, you can get 5% to 8% kind of unilaterally, just showing price leadership in the market?

Yes. I'm confident, Dave. There has been -- there have been other distributors, large distributors that have also announced similar increases, nondirect material-related. So I think all of distribution saw input costs go up last year. It seems to me they all felt -- we all felt the pain of that on the P&L. I don't have any direct evidence of it, other than what I hear in the marketplace. And so I have confidence that this year, there's going to be much less reluctance to give up on pushing both the manufacturer direct material price increase that's coming down the pipe for the most part in mid-April and then these -- the March increases. Now typically, as you announce a price increase, whether it's now or a month ago for, let's say, a March 1 launch, there's typically a number of weeks before that would -- any of it would get out into the market. So it's difficult for us to calculate what that impact is in the full year. But we're going full bore with the pressure to recoup the cost, not just from what we're going to see in '14, but of course, what we saw Q3, Q4 and then, of course, the Q1 numbers.

Hey, Dave, by the way, I do have the answer to your specific question on the math. When we do these calculations, it's also the -- adjusted for the number of exact days of the month, right? So not only is it for the months, but it's also adjusted for the days in the month as well, too. And we had a difference in days. Even though for the quarter it was the same, it varied, the days, for each of the months. So the weighting is slightly different. That's probably what you're not getting right in the math, but I can walk you through the exact days per month off-line and get you to the calculation.

And we'll take our next question from Kathryn Thompson with the Thompson Research Group.

The first is on price being -- it's our understanding in talking to the field that winter -- and this is for Residential Roofing, winter buy programs have been extended, which would beg the question or, I guess, would be helpful if you could give -- clarify what you're seeing in terms of trends, and how this could impact the shingle price increase that has been announced for April.

Yes, Kathryn. I don't -- I can't necessarily define extended. This year really isn't that much different than prior years. I mean, the manufacturers typically come out and announce the increases, which they typically do every year for the spring, and then there's some prebuying, right, as a result of the fact that prices are going to go up at some point. Last year, we know that the issue was not being able to get pricing in a soft market. So we have not seen any difference. The only real difference, I guess, is that last year, increases were announced in early December and a lot of buying was induced, much more buying than this past year, in the December period. This year, things have been a little more -- they were announced late in the year. The buying really didn't start until maybe a little later in December, but very little, and then into January. So I -- in terms of an extension of the window is open longer, I mean, we're not seeing that. In terms of our view of distribution buying big, one, it's difficult for us to see that anyway, right, because we can't see in folks' P&L. We're going to do what we typically do every year and be prudent about the kind of money we spend on the inventory based on what we think the market's going to do. So you could see us maybe buy a little more inventory than we did last year because we think -- we just believe that the markets -- very difficult to think that the market's going to be as flat 2 years in a row or to think that any kind of normal storm volume won't return. That's the best way I can answer that, Kathryn.

Okay. And maybe clarify what trends you're seeing in pricing for your Residential product versus your Non-res product and give a little bit more color on what you're seeing with Non-res trends and how that's changed versus a year ago.

Yes. I think -- Yes. We'll start with volume. The volume we saw in Q1 on Commercial was very encouraging. So we are, in generally, encouraged for the full year on the volume side. And hence, I have confidence that we will see price. ISO or insulation price increases were announced, some put into effect in January, others, March, April. I think -- I'm confident that we'll be able to see solid growth commercially for the year, and I also believe we'll be able to attain price.

And color in terms of where you're seeing your -- the volume growth, either geographically or end markets.

Yes. I don't have much data on end markets, but there's no doubt, our strength commercially is in the Northeast, parts of the East Coast and the Upper Midwest, where we have a big relationship with Carlisle, and we also do an awful lot of business with Firestone, right? We were growing also in other regions, but the percentage would be higher, the dollar value would be lower. And there's no doubt there's more optimism about improved levels of Commercial construction also, which are going to help us, we believe.

We'll take our next question from Ryan Merkel with William Blair. Ryan Merkel - William Blair & Company L.L.C., Research Division: Want to follow-up on the pricing commentary. So given the actions we've talked about today, what is your price assumption as it relates to the 5% to 10% organic growth guide?

Yes. It's a good question, Ryan. As we talked through it, as I said, it's been very difficult to try to peg a number, given last year where we had virtually no price -- negative price in Q1. I think if -- to be realistic, we're in the 1% to 2% pricing range, because if we thought we were going to get 5% on each of these actions, whether it's -- well, the manufacturers would be to keep even, right? But our own price increase is to really recoup all the cost increases we have seen. But 1% to 2% is I think a reasonable, conservative expectation.

Plus, keep in mind that timing and when that gets factored into is what also turns it down to the 1% to 2% for the full year, Ryan, because these price increases will come in effect in third quarter and fourth quarter, right, so the later part of the year when we'll really see them. Ryan Merkel - William Blair & Company L.L.C., Research Division: I'm glad you mentioned that because that was going to be my follow-up. If you got 5% for the insurance and benefits increase, and you also got 5% from the OEMs, I was going to try to figure out how that would get to 1% to 2%, but your answer there would be that would be a timing thing.

Just trying to anticipate your questions in advance, Ryan.

And remember, the manufacturer piece is really this -- for the most part to stay even with that input cost increase coming, right, which we weren't able to do, and I think most of the distribution, as I said, wasn't able to do last year. Ryan Merkel - William Blair & Company L.L.C., Research Division: Well, let me ask you this. You mentioned other large distributors that announced nonmaterial price increases. Do you have a -- can you share with us what those price increases were? Was it similar to the 5% to 8% that you're going to go out with?

Yes. Sure. Yes, right in that range, which I think that's at least 5%. Well, I've been here almost 7 years, that's the first time I've seen that. And so I'm encouraged, I'm encouraged. I think it's important for distribution, which is an important piece of the whole supply chain, to be very realistic about their P&L, our P&L, and we need to recoup. Ryan Merkel - William Blair & Company L.L.C., Research Division: Well, I'm sure a few of them have.

Those have been announced, Ryan. They're in the market. They're not speculation on my part. We've seen the documents, so they've been announced. Ryan Merkel - William Blair & Company L.L.C., Research Division: Okay. Well, I'm sure a few of them are listening to the call today, so let's hope that everyone kind of agrees there. I guess, the next question is if you get the 1% to 2% price, wouldn't price costs then be finally positive for you guys, and wouldn't that help kind of push the gross margin up towards the 24% range, or is that really going to be driven by mix?

No. You're spot on. The price, the 1% to 2%, whatever that ends up being, is going to drive that to the upper range of the 23% to 24% that I said, exactly.

We'll take our next question from Sam Darkatsh with Raymond James. Sam Darkatsh - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: So your inventory levels were up pretty meaningfully on a year-on-year basis, particularly versus your Residential sales growth, and I know your inventory is mostly Residential or largely Residential. And that's even despite the fact that last year in the December quarter, there was much heavier prebuying. So where do you peg your inventory levels versus where they should be, and where do you peg the industry inventory levels, and why shouldn't this also potentially adversely affect pricing heading into the spring?

Yes. It's a good question. Industry, I'll start with the one I can't answer real well. Industry inventory levels are very difficult to answer, right, because I can't see into what folks are doing. The word, from a number of different sources, mostly manufacturers, is that the buy is slightly below last year. But again, that's without any data. If you look at our inventory, yes, we did do a little bit of -- just a very slight load. $20 million of the number is acquired businesses. So we had about an $18 million increase, which isn't all that unusual given the quarter, given our view that we thought maybe the November, December time frame was going to be a little better, and we wanted to be prepared. We don't see the inventory as an issue, and it isn't the case where we overbought. So we believe we're in really good shape. And actually if we wanted to, we could add inventory if it made sense. I don't think, Sam, from what I've heard and seen, it'll have any material -- the industry will have any material impact on pricing. I think demand is going to gate that and then the constitution of us, let's say, I can't speak for anybody else, to attempt to get price in the market, whether it's to take the manufacturer increase, which I know they're going to pass that down, and we should pass it along. And then our increase for the increased cost we've seen in just about every area, right, we're getting continued pressure on. So I don't think the inventory buy is going to have any impact on price at all. I think it's -- normally, there's that delay we talk about always, 30 to 60 day gap. That's been normal. Last year was abnormal, and I think it's because of the lack of storm volume, lack of demand, in general. But I think if we have a normal market, normal storm volume, there'll be demand, I think there'll be price appreciation. That's our view right now. Sam Darkatsh - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: And then my follow-up question. The 1% to 2% assumption for realized pricing this year, what's the sensitivity of your gross margin assumption to that realization? Is it 1 for 1, is it less than that, and how should we factor in the sensitivity of pricing to gross margins?

Yes. I don't want to get into too much detail. But if, obviously, we're at 1% or below, we're going to be closer to the 23%, and we're going to do everything we can, obviously, to avert that. If we do 1.5%, we're going to be closer to 23.7% or so. And if we do 2%, we're going to be at 24%, 24.2%, something like that. There's other factors, obviously, in the gross margin make-up. But if there's any kind of a mix shift, which could occur because Commercial seems to be fairly strong. And given the -- what we're seeing weather-wise, there's a lot of optimism in cold-weather climates that there's going to be a fairly large spring breakout, especially on Commercial, not that there wouldn't be residentially, but there's going to be a lot of roofs damaged commercially, I think.

And we'll take our next question from Michael Rehaut with JPMorgan. Michael Jason Rehaut - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: The first question I had, I guess, just goes to your last couple of comments there, Paul, about some of the optimism and just trying to make sure I understand it right and the fact that you're deriving some of your optimism in terms of being able -- in terms of hopefully passing along the manufacturer price increase, as well as your own. It seems to be from 2 factors. One, the fact that in 2013, there was a down year, and you're still kind of in the middle of this housing recovery, and as well as the stronger Commercial demand. And I guess, number two, obviously, the harsh weather over the last couple of months may be driving some incremental storm-related demand relative to last year. Is that the right way to -- am I interpreting that right in terms of the source of your optimism?

Yes, I think it's close. It encompasses most of the big ones, housing recovery, commercial construction recovery, storm volume from the things that are going on now, and then if we just have a normal, let's say, storm year related to hail and events like that. And the other thing, Michael, I think it may be as equally important is that my belief, and I know how we feel at Beacon, '13 was a tough year for us to take, not being able to push price through. And I got to -- I have to believe majority distribution feels the same way, and I just think the appetite now to be tougher on getting price, like we normally do every year anyway, I think it's there. And then, of course, internally, we don't just sit back, wait for the cash register to ring and then see what the ticket looks like at the end of it. We have an awful lot of process improvement going on internally. I'm not going to get into detail on that, but just an awful lot related to gross margin improvements across all of the branches, whether it's pricing, whether it's cost input. So that fuels that optimism. Michael Jason Rehaut - JP Morgan Chase & Co, Research Division: Well, great. That's very helpful. I guess, second question, just some of your comments on your acquisition focus. And obviously, there hasn't been, I guess, much announced recently. As you see the market over the next couple of years, I mean, these are obviously the acquisitions that can't be controlled, you have timing, you have certain sellers that may be more willing or -- and price. I mean, would you characterize the recent lull in activity more driven by difference in pricing, or is it just the process of some of the sellers from a family standpoint or nonfinancial-related factors, that kind of, I guess, underscores your continued confidence that this acquisition focus will continue to be realized at a pace similar to the last 2, 3 years?

Yes. I think there's always going to be, of course, personal factors within the -- these businesses, right, because they have to make their decision, and they have to be ready, they have to understand their own succession planning within the family, et cetera. I do think, one, there's just a normal cycle anyway. We've seen it. If you go back to 2000 or 2004, we've had big years, we've had off years. And we're in a 4-quarter-plus since we did Ford and CMS December last year, right, where we haven't announced one. Doesn't mean our intent, our effort, all of that is diminished, as I said. It's still very strong. I think the other reality is '13 wasn't the greatest year, so a lot of the distribution didn't put up good numbers. So they're waiting to put up better numbers. So yes, pricing is better in their mind. So pricing is a piece of it, too. But I also just think there's a normal cycle of when some of these things occur. We're not going to just go out and buy any business, right? So we're selective, because if you look at the businesses for the most part, a large majority of the businesses we purchased are very, very strong businesses in their own right before we purchased them, and that's been our strategy. So we're somewhat selective. And as I've said before, we're definitely not going to overpay. We're very careful about use of our debt, use of cash. So I think we're just in a little bit of a lull. And so at the same time, to offset that, we're going to continue to focus very hard on the greenfield piece, which we have -- we've had very good success with, and we'll open, I said, this approximate 25 number. Last call, I was -- in the last 2 calls, I was talking about 15 to 20. We have confidence we can do 25. And next year, I've said 20 minimum. But ideally, I'd love to do 30 or more because I think it's -- we want a national footprint. We believe we should be in more states than we are and believe in -- we should be in more cities where we even have 1 branch, bigger cities. So it's an opportunity for us to provide value for contractors, and that's where we're going to keep pushing.

[Operator Instructions] We'll go next to Neil Frohnapple with Longbow Research.

Just a follow-up on the new branch discussion. So the 25 greenfields you're now targeting this year, you mentioned new branches should add 2% to 3% growth for the full year. So are the openings more first-half weighted? Because I thought a new branch on average generates around $2 million in sales in year 1. So that would imply growth from that would be more like 1% or 2%. So just -- can you provide any thoughts there?

Yes. No. I mean, when we talk about greenfields, we talk about it the same way we calculate acquired markets, that definition we have in the Q of the 4 quarters of existing business. So there's a few that we launched that are in that number, we launched in the Q4 of last year, of course, because they're still "green" as part of the organic piece. As we said, we opened 4 in Q1, so you're going to see, to varying degrees, full year sales. There will be, though, a number of them, if you look at them, I'm not going to go through the details of Q2, 3 and 4, but it somewhat equally plays for those quarters of when they're going to open. And there will just be some that are opened, obviously, in Q1, are going to have less sales because of Q2. The Q2 will be pushed down a bit, and then pop back up in Q3 and 4, if they are in Northern markets, although we have a number opening in Southern markets. So as we -- it's -- we do pro formas on all of these, just like we would analyze an acquired market. We have an estimate of what their sales are going to be by month as we open them. So as we do the math, that's what we come up with, is rough 2% to 3% for the ones that we open. Pretty much last year fourth quarter, most of those weighted towards the September time frame because we had a much bigger rush to push them through the back part of the year, and then the new ones that we'll open, and it works up to about that 2% to 3% or so.

That will be the difference that Paul was just describing. We -- remember, we did I think, yes, there was 7 of them in the last quarter, the fourth quarter of last year. We had a lot of them that go -- went in during that time frame. Those will be with us as part of the greenfield numbers we talked about for this year. So it's not just the 25 that we're opening this year, but it's also the other ones that we opened last year as they go through the year, too.

As I said, we use the same calculation method as we do for acquired markets, just to be consistent.

Great. And then maybe a question for Joe. I believe, last quarter, you broke down the year-over-year gross margin decline from mix, price and product cost increase. And just wondering if you're able to do that again for the December quarter. I'm wondering if a part of the gross margin decline was due to the increase in mix of direct Non-resi product sales and what that contributed as well.

So I can give you a high-level, Neil, of the gross margin rate. So last year, the first quarter, we were at that 24.7% rate. This year, we're at 23%. So how did we kind of go from one to the other? And then you could do some of it. I have the math as well, too. So the 3 big pieces to it, as we talked about, one of them kind of the price element, as Paul said; one of them, the mix issue; and then one of it, some of the cost issues. So on the price part, as Paul said, it was somewhere around 70 to 80 basis points on the gross margin impact, so around $4 million. The mix impact did have an impact to us, but not a lot of dollars, about $1 million, so somewhere around 20 basis points. And then the input costs, as Paul talked about, were somewhere around a $5 million impact to us, which is around -- somewhere around an 80-basis-point number. So that walks you from the 24.7% down to the 23% number. Does that help?

Yes, appreciate it.

So mix actually played less of an impact than in previous quarters. The bigger mix change was on our acquired businesses, and you could see that in the GM rate. And it's nothing systemically that's changed. That's just -- we're getting into where Ford is contributing more, which is the acquisition we did in northern California, they're heavy commercial, and then Western PA, that acquisition -- the later acquisition we did has got a heavier Commercial, Complementary kind of mix, which impacts the gross margins there.

And then Paul, just one clarification. And as you go forward, will that cost headwind of $5 million that you guys saw in the quarter, will that moderate in the March quarter and as we go through the year? How should we be thinking about that?

Yes. That's a good question. It should moderate, as best we can calculate. Remember, the -- for the big month we had in October, those sales were inventory we bought 3, 4, 5 months earlier, right, and that was -- that in the heat of when we were taking that material in at a higher -- yes, at a higher rate when we couldn't get to price out, right? So as we go through time, we're burning through -- we burned through most of that inventory, and we are into a different level of inventory in terms of cost-wise. So yes, it should moderate. But it's still important for us to get the price that we're talking about to get us to this higher range of the 23% to 24% gross margins.

And we'll take our last question from Brent Rakers with Wunderlich Securities.

I wanted to follow up on the potential, I guess, distributor price increase. How was that planned on being implemented? Is it a list price increase to customers? Is it a surcharge?

It's -- well, we don't -- we wouldn't talk -- typically talk list. It'd be current prices we're charging, be it price list at the branch level, are going to be increased, that range, and that's what we're going to be pushing out to the customer base.

Okay. And then if you could maybe comment...

[indiscernible] dollar -- I'm sorry. If we're charging a dollar, we're going to charge $1.05 or $1.08, or go in between, $1.065.

Okay. Fair enough. And then if you could maybe talk a bit about -- you talked about the January month, I think, down 13% year-over-year. What is the typical contribution to the overall March quarter from the January month?

That's a good question. I don't have the percentage in front of me. I don't know if Joe has it. If not, we could follow up. I know typically it's the one of the lowest months in the year, but I don't have the percentage in front of me.

Okay. And then I'm sorry, just one last question, if you could just -- it's just a housekeeping question. I know you had some items last year affecting the interest expense line. Could you maybe provide what -- the current quarter run rate? Is that a good number to use on a per-quarter basis for the remainder of the year as well?

Yes, I'll give you a quick breakdown. So in the interest expense, financing charge or other category, there's really 3 items in there. So the interest expense itself was around $2.4 million. We had a loss on FX. Again, this has to do with the Canadian exchange rate, as you guys know, changed pretty dramatically through the course of the quarter and still is today. That was around a $600,000 impact. And then we had actually some gain on some asset sales in there, so -- of around $300,000. That's what's gives you that $2.665 million number. And you asked the interest expense number, so the good news, as you probably saw from looking at our balance sheet, we are successfully able to minimize, in fact, eliminate. So our revolver, down to 0 at the end of the quarter, and you saw our cash balance grow as well, too. That helped us with a pretty good kind of interest number for the quarter.

And Brent, a rough number, I guess, to use, I don't have the exact, so January is probably in that 20% to 25% range at the quarter.

That does conclude the questions. Now I would like to turn the call back over to Mr. Isabella for his closing comments.

Yes. Let me just go through a few of the highlights for the quarter in our release. As I said, sales were a record at $552 million. We're pleased with that. Of course, we were shooting for something higher, but that represented 7.5% total growth. And it does demonstrate our ability to execute in somewhat difficult market conditions. Organic growth was 3.3%, and 2% of that, as I said, was attributed to the new branches we've opened. We opened up 4 new branches, and we're planning on the 25 for the full year. And again, as I said, that should be in the 2% to 3% organic growth. We're going to continue to be active in the acquisition market. This portion of our growth strategy has always been uneven, but we're still very positive about making additional acquisition. As Joe said, cash generation was solid in the quarter at $56 million, above last year. Cost control continues to be something we do very well, with existing markets coming in less than last year. We have a very solid debt ratio, so we're doing a good job of controlling how we're spending money. And lastly, and maybe most importantly, we're planning on these 2 price increases for the spring to offset costs we're seeing. I want to thank all of our investors for their interest in our company, as well as our customers, employees for their loyalty. This concludes our earnings call, and I'm available for calls here in the Herndon office. Thanks, and have a good day.

That does conclude today's conference. We appreciate your participation. You may now disconnect.