Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Beacon Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2022 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Daniel, and I will be your coordinator for today. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded for replay purposes. I would now like to turn the call over to Binit Sanghvi, Vice President, Capital Markets and Treasurer. Please proceed, Mr. Sanghvi.

Thank you, Noel. Good afternoon, everybody and thank you for taking the time to join us on our call today. Julian Francis, Beacon’s Chief Executive Officer, and Frank Lonegro, our Chief Financial Officer, will begin with prepared remarks that will follow the slide deck posted to the Investor Relations section of Beacon’s website. After that, we will open the call for questions. Before we begin, please reference Slide 2 for a couple of brief reminders. First, this call will contain forward looking statements about the company’s plans and objectives and future performance. Forward-looking statements can be identified because they do not relate strictly relate to historical current facts and use words such as anticipate, estimate, expect, believe and other words of similar meaning. Actual results may differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements as a result of various important factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth in the risk factors section of the company’s 2021 Form 10-K. Second, the forward-looking statements contained in this call are based on information as of today, February 23, 2023 and except as required by law, the company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any of these forward-looking statements., this call will contain references to certain non-GAAP measures. The reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP measures is set forth in today’s press release and the appendix to the presentation accompanying this call. Both the press release and the presentation are available on our website at becn.com. And finally, I just want to remind everybody, that we changed our fiscal year end to coincide with the calendar year end. As a result today we’re reporting our calendar year 2022 results as our fiscal year, as well as the result of our fiscal fourth quarter which is comparable to our transition period in the prior year period. Now, let’s begin with opening remarks from Julian.

Thanks, Binit and good afternoon, everyone. Let’s begin on Slide 4. I'm very pleased to report that we finished the year with another outstanding quarter. The team delivered fourth quarter record sales records for net sales, net income and adjusted EBITDA. Sales per day were up 14% year-over-year as pricing execution drove higher net sales across all three lines of business, despite volume being lower by mid-single digits. While we did see progressively weaker demand through the fourth quarter, pricing held up and remained stable sequentially. Residential volumes were lower as compared to a strong prior year and markets exposed to higher volume of new residential construction did slow more sharply. But I remind you that 80% of our sales come from repair and replacement activity. Non-residential demand remained solid despite destocking at the contractor level and commercial roofing supply chain problems eased with lead times on the majority of products returning to more normal levels. This helped us to unlock more of the backlog that has built up over the past 2 years. We delivered higher-than-expected gross margin and recorded our 12th straight quarter of year-over-year increase in adjusted EBITDA, continuing our track record of profitable growth. We also delivered our best quarterly cash flow since the second quarter of 2020 as we focused on rightsizing our inventory and getting to jobs that have been delayed due to supply chain problems, as we said we would on both our second and third quarter calls. We used the cash generated in the quarter to invest in value-creating initiatives towards achieving our Ambition 2025 targets while maintaining steady net debt leverage, preserving our balance sheet flexibility. During the fourth quarter, we made two acquisitions: Coastal Construction products and Whitney Building products. Whitney is a distributor of commercial and multifamily waterproofing and…

Thanks, Julian, and good evening, everyone. Turning to Slide 8. Let me start by reminding everyone that we had 1 less day in the quarter versus the prior year quarter. We achieved nearly $2 billion in total net sales in the fourth quarter, up more than 14% on a per day basis year-over-year as higher average selling prices for our products drove sales growth in all three lines of business. In the aggregate, price contributed approximately 17% to 18% to revenue growth. Our backlog conversion was a highlight in the quarter. And while it remained elevated compared to pre-pandemic levels, it continued to come down from its peak in the second quarter and continues to be weighted toward non-residential orders acquisitions, including Midway wholesale and coastal construction products are performing well and more than offset the divestiture of our solar business on December 1, 2021. As a reminder, the results of the solar business are reflected in our prior year numbers as part of continuing operations. Strong year-over-year pricing drove residential roofing sales per day, higher by approximately 7%. I also want to highlight that the average selling price was stable sequentially from the third quarter to the fourth quarter. As mentioned earlier, weakness in demand from our single-family homebuilding customers caused shingle volumes to be lower by high single digits year-over-year. Please keep in mind that the prior year comparable was a strong volume quarter, largely attributable to the late onset of winter allowing for additional roofing days last year. Non-residential roofing sales per day were up 27%, driven by price execution. Single-Ply volumes per day were higher year-over-year as the non-res supply chain began to normalize during the quarter. However, destocking at the contractor level and tight material availability of certain accessories continue to impact project cycle times,…

[Operator Instructions] The first question comes from the line of Kathryn Thompson of Thompson Research Group. Please proceed.

Thank you for taking my question today. Just a clarification on what you said in your prepared commentary and how it also bakes into your outlook. You had indicated that you had seen an improvement in trend. Could you just flesh that out a little bit more in terms of what is -- what are the factors that are driving this observation? And then against that backdrop, you do have inventories are up year-over-year about 13%. How much of that is volume versus price? And where do you think we are right now in light of the current balance of supply and demand with your inventory tonne. Thanks very much.

Thanks, Kathryn. There was a lot wrapped up in the question. I think that the first part of it was related to the trends that we're seeing in the marketplace and a sort of belief in our optimism. Look, obviously, we said that we believe that volumes will be down year-over-year. We think that, as we indicated in prior calls as well, that is primarily related to new residential construction that we think will be down double digit plus. We do think the reroof market on the residential side will be down mid-single digits, give or take. And commercial, we still believe that we're going to see about a flat market. We are anticipating we've had lower levels of storm over the past couple of years, and we're expecting that. The way we're forecasting it is to return to the 10-year average. So we see a little bit of it lift in that. And obviously, with the storms we saw in Florida at the end of last year, the weather that we've seen in California over the winter and sort of continuation of some of the storms that hit the Midwest, the Upper Midwest last year. We expect all of those markets to be relatively stronger. Obviously, the sentiment coming out of the first month of the year. I think there was a lot of commentary about the builder show being much more positive. Certainly, our contacts in the builders in the building community are much more positive than they were perhaps two or three months ago. So we're seeing that trend come through. I would say we're not seeing that in the business today. It's still obviously down, but it is also February. But I think, overall, what we're also seeing is execution on our initiatives. We're seeing the traction that we expected to see that we got from the plans that we announced and the actions that we've been taking. We're seeing great results. We're seeing terrific results from the acquisitions. We were terrifically pleased to add 10 green -- sorry, 12 greenfields in the fourth quarter. I don't know that we can keep up that target pace for a whole year. I'm not sure that would be the right answer either. But those are going to contribute more this year than they did last year, and we're going to add additional greenfields in this year. So we've got lifts from those activities as well. So overall, I feel like we're executing very, very well. I think that we're seeing the customers respond to the improved service levels we're delivering on. And overall, it's a healthy market. I mean, the overall levels of market demand, while down from the last year, 2 years, there's high levels relative to pre-pandemic and we think they're constructive markets. I'll let Frank weigh in on inventory levels. But overall, it's pretty positive.

Kathryn. So you're right, it's up $160 million year-over-year. When you break that down, about $200 million is inflation, about $40 million to $50 million is M&A and greenfields. So you're looking at at least $80 million from lower units. If you just look at it year Q4 ending year-over-year. In terms of the forward view, obviously, we're balancing a couple of different things. We want to make sure we have the products available for our customers. We also want to improve our turns in 2023 relative to where we were in the last couple of years. And then supply chains are normalizing. They're not normalized, but they are normalizing. So we want to take advantage of the lower lead times. I would expect us to continue to rightsize inventory, maybe not as much in Q1 just given the lower sales level, but you should continue to expect us to get a little bit better on inventory as we progress to the midpoint of the year, obviously, assuming we get a decent sales season in the spring .

Thank you. The next question comes from Michael Dahl of RBC. Please proceed.

Thanks for taking my question, A lot in here. I guess just a follow-up, Julian, that was helpful, the additional color on the end markets. I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like you're planning then for a volume environment that's down maybe mid- to high single digits on a blended basis, you're guiding to sales growth of 2% to 4% acquisitions adding a few percent. So I guess the delta has to be some combination of price/mix and the greenfield contributions. So maybe can you help walk us through your expectations for price mix contribution, if you could, by segment? And then if you could maybe help us just ballpark all these greenfields, what the cumulative contribution is expected to be this year?

You're right. There is a lot in that. We'll -- I'll touch on it in general. I know Frank will have a little bit more detail for you and -- but yes, I think as we think about the greenfield to start there, we see the sales begin on day 1. We had a ramp that was built into forecasts that sort of led to stable, normalized business after 3 to 5 years. I think in the last 12 months or so with the greenfields ramping up and the demand environment that we've seen, we probably had a little bit of a quicker ramp in many of these branches that we anticipated. So they've been more productive sooner than we're anticipating for sure. Obviously, the demand environment, the pricing environment has been positive to that as well. We would expect to see that roll off. As we said, we continue to see a good demand environment. I mean, if you look back historically, this type of market would have been productive for both price and volume. So we're expecting to see sort of relatively sideways movement on most of the business. Volumes will be down. We'll have price carryover in all segments of our business in all the lines of business. So that will give us a little bit of a lift as well with that price carryover. Obviously, that will come mostly in the first quarter and the first half, will ease off given how pricing shaped up last year. But -- the one area, I think, that I can elaborate a little bit more on might be in the commercial roofing segment. I mean one of the things that we saw there and we've emphasized this a few times now, is that as the supply chain really locked…

Mike, I'll try to unpack a little bit more for you. In terms of the market, I take this as a proxy for volumes to the point you were making, it's probably on an ex storm basis, something in the down mid- to high single digits. -- resi's probably more toward the upper end of that commercials relatively flat, as Julian mentioned. And then complementary is obviously a blend in that 70-30 that we mentioned in the prepared remarks, so probably down in the mid-range. -- once you start from there, then we start to build a bit, the storm planning assumption that we have is the 10-year average, so that adds 2% or 3% there. You've got Ian, you've got the hailstorms in the Midwest from last year and then the California rainstorm. So we're expecting some lift there. Relative price stability is certainly helpful. The Ambition 2025 initiatives, which would include the greenfield initiative, the customer experience, the sales workforce improvements and additions that we're doing probably add something in the mid-singles range there, order of magnitude for the greenfields. In an absolute sense, we were at about $35 million in Q4. If you look at that on a year-over-year basis because we did have a few greenfields in the prior year was about 30%. We're going to begin to lap some of those later in the year given the pace of Greenfields openings that we did this year. Coastal and some of the smaller acquisitions that we did in 2022 should add about 2% or 3%. We'll get 10 months' worth of coastal that performed quite well for us in Q4. And you put all that together and you're looking at that 2% to 4% revenue growth that we mentioned in the prepared remarks. And then remember, we are going to continue to be acquisitive. So future acquisitions in 2023 are not part of this guide, not understanding exactly when the timing and the magnitude of those will be, it's hard to bake those in. But just know that those are not in there at present.

The next question comes from the line of Ryan Merkel with William Blair. Please proceed.

What is your outlook for gross margin in '23? And then what is your estimate for price cost?

Yes. Ryan, I'd say mid-25s on gross margin, down obviously about $100 million -- excuse me, 100 basis points, apologies, about 100 basis points against last year. The big driver there is inventory profits. I mean we're going to roll off something around 130 basis points. And most of that's going to be in your price cost. It's not that the selling price is impacted. It's just that the cost catch-up finally given all the manufacturing increases last year. But that's going to be partially offset by a couple of different things, the structural improvements that we are making in the bottom quintile branches, digital private label, et cetera, and some accretion from the acquisitions. Coastal is a margin-accretive acquisition for us. And then we likely will have, especially in the second half of the year, higher commercial mix impact as well. So you roll all that through, and you're going to see the inventory profit roll off show up largely in price/cost.

The next question comes from Garik Shmois with Loop Capital.

I'm just wondering how to think about operating expenses in 2023, given all the puts and takes...

In the overall, I think I would put it in the -- if you looked at an OpEx to sales ratio, Garik, I think it's somewhere in that 17% to 17.5% range. As Julian mentioned, we're going to continue to focus hard on productivity. If and when volumes go one way or another, we're going to have to varabilize with those, we're resetting the bonus to targets. -- inflation is still in the business on the cost side. So we've got a lot of stomach there. And I read off a litany of things in the prepared remarks. Those are going to be the same inflationary items as we go forward into next year. And we did say and believe strongly that we need to continue to invest through the cycle. So you're going to see us invest in the A25 Ambition 2025 initiatives. So the greenfields, the sales and sales support teams, the M&A teams, the service capabilities that we're creating, branch optimization, OTC. I mean, all the things that you've heard us talk about, we're going to continue to invest in those. If volumes take a dramatic step down, obviously, that will pull up the old Covi [ph] playbook and work from that. But we don't see that happening in 2023. So managing them, but also investing is going to be the important thing for us to do.

Yes. As a part of our Ambition 2025 plan, we've committed to OpEx levels of productivity to get us there. So it is something that we're focused on, but we remain confident that we can deliver against that plan and that sort of level of spending relative to sales.

The next question comes from Truman Patterson of Wolfe Research.

I wanted to discuss the bottom quintile branch performance. I think EBITDA benefit was $36 million in 2022. Is that purely on kind of the relative improvement versus other branches? And how are you all thinking about the potential there in 2023 improvement to your bottom line?

Truman, so good call out on the VQs. So yes, $36 million and again, on the backs of, I think, $50 million or more million last year and $25 million in 2020. So that initiative continues to bear fruit on an annual basis. That is the year-over-year change in bottom line dollars, profitability dollars of that same set of branches in the prior year versus that same set of branches in the current year. So it is true bottom line improvement from that group of the bottom quintile branches. If you unpack that a little bit, the EBITDA margin improvement was over 200 basis points in those branches. So we did a really nice job of driving that. It is both on the gross margin percentage line as well as on the OpEx leverage line, probably a little bit more on the OpEx side in those set of branches in 2022. And interestingly, the sales growth in those branches on a full year basis was higher than the company average. So those branches really did a nice job. We still think there's a ton of opportunity there. There's hundreds of basis points difference between the bottom quintile and what we call the performing branches, so the other 80% of the branches. So we still think there's a lot of fruit there.

The next question comes from the line of Philip Ng with Jefferies.

Congrats on another strong quarter, great execution. Julian, you mentioned that you're seeing some destocking at the contractor lever on the commercial side. Can you expand on kind of where you guys are in that process, seeing any other areas where you're seeing destocking? And certainly, on the commercial side, the reason why I asked is because pricing has been so explosive, -- any concerns that you can see some degradation there this year?

Yes. So it's a great question, Philip. And the visibility in contractor inventories, which is, first of all, not something that I would have been saying 3 years ago. It's just an unusual situation that they would be taking in inventory and managing. That's -- I just think that emphasizes how different this environment has been. So -- we believe that the first quarter this year, you'll see a good deal of destocking there. I don't think the contractors particularly want to hold that. The information that we have suggests that they took out short-term leases on warehouse locations in order to stock they're stocking at job sites, which has risk to it as well. So we think this will be a relatively short-lived phenomenon. We should be through it, hopefully, certainly by I think the middle of the year, we would expect to see the majority of that get worked through. But it is something that we're not -- it's not been typical to see. I do want to emphasize, there was a good deal of destocking in Q4, both at the contractor level and at the distributor level. I think that's reflected in the manufacturer shipment data that you saw. And again, your question related to the pricing. I mean pricing was pretty stable year-over-year and sequentially. The other thing is that we're seeing is that as I keep emphasizing the end markets are pretty slight. We expect a pretty good year in both the commercial markets and the residential markets. We think there'll be a little bit of a move away from new construction to repair and replacement. In both of those markets. I think that on the commercial side, particularly, that usually benefits us in that a lot more goes through warehouses as we fulfill replacement roofs as opposed to some of the direct ship that goes to new. So we believe we saw a shift there. So like I said, I think it's been positive. You're right, there has been explosive growth in the pricing in the commercial arena. But so far, we've seen a relatively constructive market. I think that the fact that there is a bunch of inventory out there creates some incentives to make sure that you don't see degradation in that level of pricing. So overall, look, things can change, but we believe today that we're seeing a pretty constructive market with good end-use demand and generally a positive environment.

The next question comes from Keith Hughes of Truist.

You talked on the first quarter guidance about the level of OpEx, which puts up a good bit year-over-year, similar to the fourth. Can you talk about what's driving that up? And does any of those costs abate to get to this mid-'17 number you're talking about as a year as well?

Keith. So yes, I think if you go back and look at the prepared remarks on Q4, you're going to see pretty much the exact same set of factors in Q1. As Julian and I both mentioned in our remarks, holding on to employees in what is still a very persistent labor market, especially in the trucking and warehouse and helper all the folks who deliver for us every single day. I mean, that job market is still tight, and we don't want to put ourselves in a situation where we make a short-sighted decision in the winter and end up coming out in the spring and not having enough folks to handle the demand that we would expect on a kind of a normal spring construction season basis. Maybe one data point that might be helpful in the implication of about $40 million year-over-year, about half of that is going to be the payroll and benefit side and half of that is going to be from M&A. So don't forget about the fact that we've got M&A and greenfield, et cetera, that are going to continue to add to the OpEx line. We will begin to cycle some of those investments as we go throughout the year. Obviously, we're not going to run a 20 or 21 leverage throughout the year in order to get down to 17% to 17.5% that I mentioned in response to the earlier question.

The next question comes from the line of Trey Grooms of Stephens.

So Julie and Frank, you mentioned on the guide there. New res down double digit plus. I think I heard that right, which makes sense. And Red reroofing down, I think it was high single digits, give or take. But given the highly nondiscretionary nature of reroofing and some storm-related demand you talked about, is this pullback in reroofing in '23 more of a function of some pull forward of demand over the last few years? Or are you starting to see homeowners start to try to delay some of these repairs or replacement projects given the uncertainty and higher cost to borrow. If you could just help us understand kind of some of those drivers on the weaker reroof portion of the business.

Yes. Look, I think that the last couple of years have been pretty unique in terms of what we've seen with people being literally forced to stay at home. And I think there's been a little bit of work that got done there, that was perhaps more discretionary than nondiscretionary. The nondiscretionary ports it's nondiscretionary. So we would continue to see that. The storm-related demand is -- we do think that is up, that's in our guide. As we said, we always go back to the 10-year average there. So that is a little bit of a lift. I don't know that we're seeing consumers pull back, I think, was the word that you used. But inevitably higher rates when a lot of roofs are refinanced is going to have an impact at the margin. I think that we see that. The other thing that you would typically see is part of the reroof demand is created by the turnover in housing. So as has changed hands, that's when you do the inspection, the inspection comes back and says, the roof is old, you should do that. As houses turn over less, and obviously, there is a little bit of jam-up in that market as you don't want to leave your 3% mortgage home and get one right now because you're going to pay 6%. So that crimps you. So we're going to see -- we think we're going to see a little bit of lower turnover in the housing stock, and that will lead to slightly lower level of demand as reroof gets done on turnover. So that's really it. So I don't see that as consumer pull back and saying, I was going to do a roof. I'm not going to do it now because I'm trying to something. It's more related to housing stock turnover and the ability then of the homeowners to get the house inspected and to drive that. So that's where I think this forecast is really coming from. And hopefully, that's helpful.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of David MacGregor of Longbow Research.

Yes. Good afternoon, everybody. And Julian, congratulations on all the progress. It's really remarkable, which you've confused to you in the last couple of years. I guess I wanted to ask you about price discipline and Beacon's obviously demonstrated over the past couple of years the positive impact of disciplined on pricing. But at the same time, we all realize it in a more challenging volume environment, promotional programs are going to become more pervasive. So how do you balance the need for price discipline and a slower macro would we need to maintain or grow your market share?

Yes, it's a great question. And I think it comes back again to -- look, we actually think demand is pretty good. If we were looking at this demand environment coming from a 35 a number and the ABI index from lower coming up, we'll be talking completely differently about business. And I think that what we see is that the reality of the marketplace is that when you get that type of price competition is when people are like, I can't cover them a fixed cost, and I'm worried about this, the manufacturers are making movement. I don't think you've got that environment. The overall demand levels are pretty good. Yes, they're down, but that is still higher than it was pre-pandemic. And I think other than 2017, which was a big storm yet, I think we're all in the frame of mind that this is probably going to be as good a year as we've had in the last 15 other than maybe 2017 and the last 2 or so. So I do think that we've got a little bit of a sort of distorted perspective on what's going on in the market. I think it's a constructive environment. I think that it's not we're starting for volume, and we need to cover fixed costs. I don't think that we're facing that. I don't think any of the manufacturers are facing that. So I think the environment is probably more supportive than I think people are managing, given that we're talking about double-digit declines in new housing. Now we're watching it carefully. Obviously, the run-up in pricing has been incredibly supportive. But also remember, this is inflation that ran through raw materials as well. It's -- yes, we've enhanced our margins. I think the manufacturers have probably enhanced this as well. But we're not talking so far out of sort of historical norms that it's just inevitable that it's going to come back down. I still continue to believe that it's going to be -- there's going to be a sense that this is a sustainable market. Our costs are up. I think a lot of what we've seen, particularly at Beacon in the last 2 to 3 years. The inflation has masked the improvement that we've done our self-help initiatives. So it's -- like I said, I can't -- I'm not going to look into the crystal ball and say it will never happen, but the environment just doesn't seem to me to be conceive disruptive actions in the marketplace right now.

One other point maybe is just what we did on inventory. I mean we took a very constructive view on inventory in the middle of 2022, realized that things were likely going to soften up as the Fed engaged in its pace of rate increases. And as you can see, we methodically worked that down over the past couple of quarters, and I think have it in a much better place than it was in the middle of the year in 2022. And that framework and that methodology that we use, I think, was very constructive to where things are from a pricing perspective.

Yes, we saw destocking throughout the fourth quarter, not just in us. Volumes are down, manufacturing shipments were down and prices were stable sequentially. So I think that's an element of that is a proof point of what we continue to believe the market will bear.

The next question comes from Ketan Mamtora of BMO.

Congratulations on a strong 2022. I just wanted to ask sort of where you are seeing the most M&A opportunity within your portfolio? And how do you think about it in the context of sort of balance sheet leverage, given at least the economic environment is looking uncertain.

Thanks for the question, Ketan. It's still, Look, I think that the opportunities are manifold across all segments of our business. I think the acquisition of Coastal was a little bit of a game changer in the sort of waterproofing and the repair markets for those product lines. I think that has sort of increased the opportunities we have in that space, obviously, shortly after that, we completed another acquisition in that area of our business. So we're seeing the opportunities there, perhaps ramp up a little bit. Obviously, we've had several terrific years in all of our markets. And I think it's -- as we start to think about what the future holds, we believe there's going to be M&A opportunity in a lot of different areas, I think, in the segments. Obviously, we committed to being disciplined. We're very conscious of our trading multiple and the commitment that we made to ensure that we were a synergized levels, we could get acquisitions done at reasonable costs. We're going to remain disciplined. We believe that we're still a great buy in this marketplace, and we've got a share buyback program now that is enhanced. So our capital allocation approach is flexible. If we don't see the opportunity to do what we believe is significant accretive M&A, then we've got the option to toggle more towards share buybacks, and we think that's the right approach. But it's really across everything. I would say that the acquisition we made in the waterproofing space has probably opened up a little bit of our aperture there.

Ketan, I think on the M&A side, you should just know that as we have said in prior quarters, we have a very active pipeline and are involved in a number of both bilateral as well as process-oriented conversations with potential sellers. Your leverage question, just like we said at the Investor Day, we are going to be very disciplined in terms of capital allocation. We are going to stay well within the 2 to 3 times range. We're at 2.0 coming out of the prior year. We've got a strong cash generation year ahead of us in 2023. So we feel like we have some deployable capital. And as Julian mentioned, we'll toggle back and forth between M&A and buybacks just depending on the availability and the time frame.

The next question comes from Stanley Elliott of Stifel.

Can you talk a little bit about kind of what's happening with the national accounts. My math -- if my math is right, I mean, you're basically at the $1 billion number almost right now. Some of that is with the move into coastal and water remediation piece, what sort of having more of a national footprint is helping that? And really just curious do you have on the national accounts.

Sure. Look, our national accounts business has been terrific. They're executing very well. And I think that the value proposition that we bring as a national supplier is being recognized by those accounts. You're right, we set out a $1 billion number and the broadly add $1 billion. Obviously, we're going to push them to raise their numbers so that we can continue that growth. But we do think that it is an area where our competitive advantages that we articulated at Investor Day around the scale advantages that we have, the network model where our branches act as a market, as a team in a market and our ability to make sure we can serve customers market to market. That is a tremendous advantage to national account type customers. And then the investments that we make in private label digital. These are things that the national account customers value greatly. So I think that that has been a tremendous success. Obviously, inflation has also played a big part in that growth. So that I won't discount that. It's not been all volume related, but we're very pleased. Now inside of that, I would tell you that the large homebuilder segment is a part of our national accounts team. So we're watching that very carefully. Obviously, we've seen it down in terms of volume. The more positive sentiment starting the year has been good news. But again, we believe we provide tremendous value. In terms of the waterproofing segment of the business post coastal -- we were very, very thoughtful in going into this. As we thought about our portfolio a couple of years ago, obviously, we divested interiors, we divested the solar business. We were very conscious about keeping our existing waterproofing business that we had, primarily on the West Coast. We believe this was a great segment for us to invest in. We thought the market dynamics were going to be pro-growth. We did not see any of the players on a national basis. And we thought we had the opportunity to build the nation's leading waterproofing specialty distributor. The overlap with the roofing business is high. There's a lot of back and for on that. But the Coastal acquisition has opened our aperture and I think we believe that there's probably more opportunity now than we thought going in. It's a terrific team. It's a very technical sale. It's a highly specified sale, and that tends to lead to good repeat business. And given like you said the trends climate-related moves, certainly, the tragedy in Florida with the collapse of the condo building that was related to waterproofing. All of these, we believe, point to a segment of the market that we'll see enhanced growth over the next several years, and we believe now that we're the leading player in the market.

And our final question comes from Michael Rehaut with JPMorgan.

Doug Gordon for Mike. I was just wondering, regarding your 2023 EBITDA guidance, how much contribution are you assuming from Ambition 2025, particularly as it relates to lower quintile performance, the digital initiatives and private label, if you can just add a little bit of color around those 3 points?

Yes. I think the easiest way to dimensionalize it for you is to just think through the revenue element of things and then you can imply a fairly standard EBITDA margin to it. But if you think about greenfield OSRs, the customer experience initiatives, things that are excluding M&A, you're probably in that 4% to 5% revenue growth range. And then you think about M&A that we've already done, how that carries over into the year 2023 would be in that 2% to 3% range. So I think if you took that and dimensionalize that into dollars and then implied your sort of average contribution to the bottom line, you get to a pretty good number.

Thank you. And with that, we will conclude our question-and-answer portion of today's call. I would now like to pass the conference back over to the management team for closing remarks.

Thank you, Daniel. I appreciate all of the questions today and all of you attending it. I do want to reflect on what was a really terrific 2022 market conditions were obviously helpful, but the execution that our team demonstrated, I think, was really outstanding and delivered results that I think were well beyond what was anticipated 12 months ago. We're certainly excited and I want to offer my sincere thanks to all of our 7,000-plus team members for a really outstanding 2022. Thank you all on the call for your interest in Beacon, and we wish you the best in this year.

And with that, we will conclude today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect your lines.