Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to LiveRamp's Fiscal 2023 First Quarter Earnings Call. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to your host, Lauren Dillard, Senior Vice President of Finance and Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good afternoon and welcome. Thank you for joining us to discuss our fiscal 2023 first quarter results. With me today are Scott Howe, our CEO; and Warren Jenson, President and CFO. Today's press release and this call may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. For a detailed description of these risks, please read the Risk Factors section of our public filings and the press release. A copy of our press release and financial schedules, including any reconciliation to non-GAAP financial measures, is available at liveramp.com. Also, during the call today, we will be referring to the slide deck posted on our website. At this time, I'll turn the call over to Scott.

Thank you, Lauren, and thanks to all of you for joining us today. I'm going to dive right in to our quarterly performance. There was a lot to like about our Q1 performance and I'll share some of the highlights. But there were also some things we didn't like and I'll talk about those areas also, and importantly, what we're doing to improve our performance for the future. Q1, again, exceeded guidance across all metrics. Total revenue grew 19% and Subscription revenue was up 20%. Marketplace & Other grew 18%, driven by our Data Marketplace business, which was up 29% in the quarter. We ended the quarter with $409 million in ARR, up 20% compared to the same period last year. On the new business front, we would have liked to report stronger net adds which came in at only 5 for the quarter. New business in the US is simply not where I would like it to be. During the past quarter, we put a real emphasis on building earlier stage pipeline, onboarding additional sales reps and developing our partner and cloud channels, but these activities are inherently longer lead time initiatives. While disappointed in volumes, we remain very encouraged by the quality of new customers we are adding. For example, in the quarter, we continued to see particular strength in our large enterprise customer segment as a result of increased adoption of our enterprise data enablement platform, Safe Haven. Our $0.5 million to $1 million customer count was up 28%, and our $1 million-plus customer count grew to 90, an increase of roughly 30% compared to the prior year. In the quarter, we signed a notable new deal with a major automotive manufacturer to help support the launch of its new global vehicle services and distribution business. This…

Thanks, Scott. And good afternoon, everyone. And thanks for joining us today. Q1 was a solid quarter and in line with our expectations. Today, I'd like to focus my remarks on two areas: first, share a few highlights for the quarter; and next, provide guidance for Q2 and update our guidance for the full year. For the quarter, total revenue was $142 million, up 19%, and Subscription revenue was up 20%. International revenue was up approximately 40%, and adjusted for FX was up 49%. Marketplace & Other increased 18%. Data Marketplace, which represents roughly 80% of ongoing Marketplace & Other revenue, was up 29%. Subscription and platform net retention were both 113%. While net Subscription customer accounts increased by just 5 this quarter, our $1 million customer count was 90, up 29% versus the prior year. Current RPO or our next 12-month contracted backlog was $295 million, up 15% year-over-year. ARR ended the quarter at $409 million, up 20%. To be balanced, as anticipated, our bookings were soft in Q1. International bookings, however, did remain strong. Beneath the top line, our business model continues to deliver. Gross margin was 75%. Operating income was $4 million, our ninth consecutive quarter of profitability. And operating cash flow was negative $33 million. Please remember that Q1 is a seasonally low cash flow quarter due to annual incentive comp payments. In addition, the year-ago quarter benefited from the prepayment of certain expenses in Q4 of FY 2021. These prepayments were made in order to optimize tax refunds provided for in the CARES Act. And finally, we continue to return capital to shareholders. In the quarter, we repurchased 2.1 million shares for $60 million. And fiscal year-to-date, we have repurchased $80 million. Please turn to slide 5. Before moving on to guidance, as always, would…

[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Elizabeth Porter with Morgan Stanley.

Hey, guys. This is Chris Quintero on for Elizabeth. Just wanted to touch on your guidance. Talked about elongating sales cycles and just curious if any of that has to do with the cookies, they're lying and delayed as marketers might feel less pressed to look at alternative solutions like yours in the near term?

No. 100% macro environment. We don't see an impact on Google's deprecation delay in our business at all. If we see one, it would be absolutely negligible. And as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, regardless of whether someone is committed to cookies or already prepared to move away from them, in either case, we're going to support them.

Your next question comes from the line of Kirk Materne with Evercore. Please go ahead.

Hi, guys. This is actually Peter Burkly on for Kirk. So I guess first -- hey, Warren. I guess first one, just last quarter, you guys kind of mentioned that the forward guidance, you're baking in a bit of conservatism around largely the usage portion, I guess, and a little bit in the Marketplace. Just given new commentary, I assume, the net change in the guide here, is that really just -- I mean, the macro has certainly deteriorated over the last quarter or so. Assuming that, that changes, it's really just entirely incremental conservatism as opposed to anything maybe negative you saw in the quarter.

Peter, let me try to address that. The first thing that I would say is I would never just say it's incremental conservatism because we call them like we see them. But I think you've pretty much answered the question yourself. What's happened? A lot has changed since we last spoke in May. If you think about it, a couple of quarters of negative GDP growth, inflation continues, very strong rate hikes. Now we're hearing of layoffs and some of the largest corporations and most important corporations in America, if not, not the world. And then finally, I would just say we've had a lot of conversations with our customers. So based on the overall macroeconomic backdrop, we just felt it prudent to really hedge going into the back part of the year.

Okay. Great. That's helpful. Maybe just one more, if I could. Yes, you guys mentioned hiring last quarter and you kind of brought it off again this quarter saying had some strong hiring in the quarter. And that onboarding program to sort of shorten the ramp time for the reps is pretty interesting as well. So just curious, as you guys stand here today, how do you feel about the current head count? Are you kind of more back in line with where you want to be or are you going to continue to hire pretty aggressively kind of throughout the areas?

Yes. It's really a mixed bag. So I would tell you, number one, we're really happy with our ability to add 20 sellers and get them ramped up quickly. We think that's going to help going forward, even against the economic recessionary pressures that we expect. And we'll continue to hire selectively in key engineering areas where it's really critical for our product development. But in other areas of our business, as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, we are really using the recessionary pressure that everyone's feeling to take a hard look at our own cost structure. And so, in a lot of other areas, we expect to unlock operational efficiencies.

Your next question comes from the line of Shyam Patil with Susquehanna. Please go ahead.

Hi. I just had a few questions. Warren, just back to the answer that you just gave, I'm just curious, in your outlook for the fiscal second half, are you guy’s actually seeing things getting worse or are you just kind of assuming things will get worse based on all the external news right now?

Boy, that's a really good question. Obviously, our quarter, Q1, was pretty much as is to our guide. And our Q2, if you look at again the guide, is pretty much un-impacted. Where we are seeing and really feel the need to really adjust our estimates is really all in Q3 and Q4. So I'd say again, what has changed, I'd say it's the macroeconomic environment. It has, I would say, gotten worse since we spoke in May. I think that's definitely worse. I'd say, our customer conversations are talking -- they're talking to us about a lot of the things that they're concerned about. So what I would say is, again, it's a backdrop to what I said, those are things that -- those are conversations we've been having this quarter, and taking those things into account really caused us to lower our bookings outlook going into the second half of the year, and as a consequence, lower our overall estimates.

Okay. Got it. Got it. And Scott, in your prepared remarks, you talked about certain industries seeing softness and then talked about SMBs. Was just curious on the SMB side, how big is that as a portion of your Subscription business? And then which industry types are you guys, I guess, forecasting downward revisions for the second half of your fiscal year?

Yes. The SMBs, give or take, call it 20%, 25% thereabouts of our business. That said, obviously, our real strength is with the larger enterprise clients. I look at the SMB, Shyam, as a potential opportunity for us longer term. And why I say that is, historically, we haven't always been able to have kind of an affordable cost to serve for smaller type clients. I think that's where the channel partnership opportunities could really help us out. If you think about how those SMBs are buying, so often they're turning to, say, their marketing clouds or their public cloud partners and thinking about LiveRamp as part of that bundle. So to the extent that we can reach them through a Snowflake or through a Salesforce or through an Azure, that could be a real opportunity for us longer term. That said, short term, we feel like we've lived this before and it wasn't that long ago, right? If you think about the first couple of quarters of COVID, the conversations we had with clients then are very similar to the ones we're having now. They were scared. They didn't know what to do. Now long term, we had a playbook and we saw that -- we think we did really well in that recession, particularly pulling out of it because we're able to talk to our clients about, in a recession, it's more important than ever that every marketing dollar be accountable and addressable. The only way you can do that is through LiveRamp. So we think we'd become more important as a recession deepens. But at the very start of it, I'd just tell you, everybody's scared, everybody's nervous, and no one has certainty as to what the next couple of quarters will look like.

Got it. If I could sneak in one more quick one. In your Marketplace & Other line item, it seems like the outlook is a bit more optimistic. Just curious, I mean, I think we've all assumed that it's more sensitive to macro than Subscription business. Just what gives you guys that maybe relatively more optimism there?

I'd say a couple of things. First of all, we did lower our estimate from 25% growth to, call it, roughly, 20% growth. So we did bring down our outlook. However, underneath that, there's some really interesting things going on. First of all, in Data Marketplace, by the third quarter, we should have Data Marketplace integrated into Safe Haven. We think that's a big deal. And it's actually one of the top use cases that our customers are asking us for. We are introducing tools for better discoverability and believe that we can increase our brand attach rate. And then finally, really the integration of Data Marketplace into more destinations, think like the mini walled gardens. So while, yes, you're 100% correct, there's some real positive things also going on inside the business. And then finally, one of the real bright spots is our service business. While still small today, we're expecting that this business will roughly double in FY 2023. And so far, based on all of our bookings and everything that's gone on in Q1 and what's expected for Q2, we're off to a great start. So yes, I'd say, comment, 100% correct. Estimates have been slightly lowered. But at the same time, there's some real positive things going on underneath the hood.

Your next question comes from the line of Jason Kreyer with Craig-Hallum. Please go ahead.

Thank you, guys. Scott, you made some indications in your comments just on some of the early signals you're seeing. So I think you referenced like the longer sales cycles, lower conversion rates, things like that. Can you unpack that a little bit more like how broad based that is or if it's just kind of early indication from a few clients? Just anything more there would be helpful.

I'd say, early indications as opposed to a trend line, trend lines formed over weeks and quarters and we're still in the very early stages. I would tell you, the softness we saw in our new logo is really a continuation of what I started talking about last quarter. And that is, having enough selling capacity and then also building pipeline. I only know one way that sales works and that is one conversation, one sales rep, one day at a time. And you just got to rinse and repeat and keep doing that. And so, we are really kind of relentlessly focused on continuing to hire and onboard, continuing to build pipeline. We've rolled out some lead-gen programs, and then really pushing hard on this channel partner strategy. So short term, we think that we're going to face these recessionary headwinds. But long term, we're pretty optimistic that the investments we're making right now will pay dividends in the coming quarters.

Okay. And then, Warren, you'd referenced the waterfall on slide 16. So you've got like $22 million in scale and efficiencies. That's down from, I think, $32 million that you called out last quarter. So I think the scale component makes a lot of sense with a lower top line. I just wanted to double click on that efficiency component. So when you talk about like protecting the bottom line over the course of this year, do you anticipate seeing more there or should we expect that to be revised? Or are there different elements baked into that efficiency component?

Well, I wouldn’t take our guidance for what it is. But at the same time, I'd just reiterate what Scott said as we're looking at all elements of our cost structure. I think this represents a good time again to do that as we always have in the past, too. We're being tight on hiring overall. But that said, again, to repeat what Scott mentioned, we're going to continue to fund our growth initiatives and make investments in our sales force and in engineering and elsewhere because we are playing for the long term. But at the same time, we're going to take this as an opportunity to really avoid some costs and continue to right size our overall expense base. And then finally, I mentioned this in my prepared remarks, we're also doing this with an eye toward FY 2024. So we're looking at not only the impact of what this could mean for this fiscal year, but also setting ourselves up, hopefully, for success as we move into the next year.

Your next question comes from the line of Tim Nollen with Macquarie.

I hope you don't mind if I harp on the guidance one more time, and then I've got another question as well. But just to be clear, is it more the discretionary spending element within Subscriptions and also obviously on the Marketplace side that leads to the reduction? Or is there some of the fact that you were a little behind in your hiring due to COVID times and therefore your new business is a little bit slower than you would like? Is it a mix of both or one or the other for the guide for this year?

I would say, if you mean the discretionary element, utilization, I think we've pretty much had that right, Tim, when we gave our guidance in May. We've seen it basically really hold up. I mean, we were 12% obviously in Q1. And everything that we can see, our initial guide, give or take, of roughly 11% seems like it's the right guide. So really where we're seeing it is in booking softness. So as I mentioned, we, on our last call, talked about booking softness for the first half of the year. We now believe that booking softness is going to increase through the back part of the year. And then as you would expect looking at the overall macro backdrop, we've also increased our estimates for contraction, and so the combination of those two things is really what's driving the lowering of our Subscription forecast.

Okay. Yes. I guess I'm wondering, is it more on elements of spending that clients can be discretionary on, as in spend versus not spend.

Got it.

More [indiscernible] staff element of the business, which --. Really, I'm glad you pushed on that a little bit. Where we're seeing the pressure are on things really media related. So think about activation and targeting related use cases. So that's where we're seeing the pressure, both in terms of bookings and expected contraction.

Yes. That's what I was looking for? That's what I was expecting. Okay. Thanks.

Good. No, thanks for pushing on that.

Okay. Can I ask one other question as well? You mentioned International being relatively strong. On your last call, you talked about this Trade Desk EUID relationship and you talked about this Carrefour win. Is the International optimism deriving from those things? And is it more in Europe or is there more to it than that?

I would say, yes and yes. I mean, those are all positive things. And we're really looking forward to our global partnership with Trade Desk. There are two things going on internationally is, I think, for everybody, if you recall, two years ago, we really shifted our strategy and we sell one thing and it's basically Safe Haven. So I think we've really over the course of the last couple of years, really been able to build our enterprise sales muscle internationally as it relates to Safe Haven. And we're benefiting from that across the board. The second thing, and Carrefour by far is one of the linchpins here, is the retail flywheel is just working, and is more advanced in Europe than it is in the US. So that's the second element from which we are benefiting. So those would be the two factors I would call out.

Your next question comes from the line of Nicholas Zangler from Stephens. Please go ahead.

Yes. Hi, guys. I know you touched so many advertising channels. So is there any way to delineate if there are any channels in particular where we're most likely to see such a pullback in the back half of the year, whereas maybe others might be less impacted? I'm kind of talking about social media versus TV versus connected TV. Just anyway to parse out what you might see in the back half there?

It's an interesting question, and we can answer that. I don't have the data at the tip of my fingers right now because where we would see that is in our distributions and how the mix has changed over time. And so, we have seen in the past, for instance, when there are shifts between the walled garden and the open web or CTV, we see that in our numbers. And I just haven't run it to have the data at my fingertips. But we will do that and get back to you on that because it's a great question.

No. That's fine. I'm also just curious about your exposure to political ad spend. We've seen some strong early commentary from some broadcasters in TV. So I was just curious, if you're -- how would you describe your exposure to that, if at all? And just your thoughts on the impact, I guess, for what is your 2Q and likely your 3Q?

Yes. Very little year-to-date. But I will tell you, historically, we have been involved and both on issue levels and with parties. And so, I would expect we would participate in that going into calendar Q3 and the elections yet again. But that would be baked into our guidance.

Your next question comes from the line of Robert Coolbrith with Wells Fargo.

Great. Thank you for taking our questions. First, wondering if you could talk to client urgency with respect to ATS with the deprecation deadlines being pushed out again to 2024. I understand you have the benefits of the product versus cookies, so just wondering if you could speak to motivation you're seeing in way of your [Inaudible] customers right now. And then on the Safe Haven side, Scott, I think you've talked to differentiation versus competitors, but in the past few calls you touched on it but I think with respect to the public clouds in your comments earlier. But just wondering if you could maybe revisit the topic of competitive differentiation for Safe Haven, who you're going head-to-head with, if anyone, on a consistent basis? And what is driving customer decision in favor of Safe Haven? Thank you.

Sure. I'll take the first one and Warren maybe you can take the second on Safe Haven. With respect to -- sorry, lost my train of thought. Remind me of the first question again.

Sorry, just on the client urgency around ATS --.

ATS, yes.

Considering that cookie deprecation deadlines are being pushed out further.

Yes. So on that, what I would tell you is sophisticated advertisers see an opportunity because they're actually generating a pretty significant lift. Remember that, roughly, 45% of US ad traffic has already moved off of cookies. That is Microsoft Edge, it is Firefox, and it is Safari. And so, if you want to advertise effectively on those browsers, you have to authenticate. And we're seeing phenomenal lift there. So sophisticated advertisers recognize that, and they view this as a first-mover advantage to really reach audiences that haven't been addressable in a few years. On the publisher’s side, it's interesting. I was at a publisher summit last week on addressability, and some of the biggest publishers in the world were there with us. And without exception, without exception, they have seen strong results from ATS the kind of lifts that Microsoft has publicly reported of 40% improvements in yield are par for the course, and in many cases, much better. However, what they all were talking about is how do they work together to further accelerate advertiser demand? Because while the sophisticated advertisers see the opportunity, that is not necessarily yet the case with everyone. Now all that said, let me just reiterate one final point here. It's what I said in my prepared remarks, we actually don't care. And whether an advertiser wants to use cookies or whether they want to use authenticated measures, doesn't matter to us. We're going to support both. As long as different identifiers exist, we're going to support different identifiers. The only reason we really care is because it's creating confusion in the market and with investors. And so often, we get the question of what's the impact on your financials? Couple of years ago, people said, hey, we're concerned that cookies are going away. Now the same investors are saying, hey, we're concerned that cookies aren't going away. And so, we'd just like some finality to this, so we can take that risk off the table altogether because we don't believe there's any risk here.

And then let me jump in on the Safe Haven question. It's a really good one. Why are we winning? And I would highlight really five things that differentiate Safe Haven from the rest of the market. And if you quickly dive under the requirements that a brand has for their environment, cleanrooms aren't just cleanrooms. You have to have a lot more than that. And I'm going to highlight really five things. The first thing is our neutrality. We don't buy or sell media, so we're agnostic. The second point here is we're cloud-agnostic. We can partner with anybody. Two, privacy. This has been a hallmark of LiveRamp is our privacy standard. And if you think about privacy-preserving technology, we are really at the forefront of defining that. The third thing is it just doesn't work without identity. And we are the global leader in identity and the standard, whether it's in the cookie world or in the cookie-less world. Fourth, with ATS, if you're a global brand, we're futureproof, given ATS. And then finally, it's the ability to handle permissions at scale. So taken together, those are five requirements that any brand out there thinking about Safe Haven deployment really asks about and are critical to having the sort of capabilities that they need. But more importantly, each of those elements fall right into the sweet spot of LiveRamp.

Awesome. Warren, just on the cloud-agnostic point. Fair to say that the move or shift to multi-cloud and hybrids doesn't benefit you, given your cloud-agnostic stance?

100%.

This concludes the question-and-answer session. I will turn the call to Warren Jenson.

Great. Well, everybody, again, thank you so much for joining us. And let me just conclude with some of the same remarks I made in the prepared remarks. For us, while it's disappointing to reduce our back-half guide, we feel like it's the appropriate thing to do given the trends that we're seeing and that we're sensing. That said, we would 100% also separate the short term from the long term as we're highly confident in our long-term opportunity. Rest assured that while we're tightening our belts, we're also taking steps to ensure that we're also continuing to invest for our future, but at the same time, protecting our bottom line and setting us up for the years ahead. Again, on behalf of everybody here at LiveRamp, thank you so much for joining us today.

This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect your line.