Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Welcome to the RADCOM Ltd. Results Conference Call for the Second Quarter of 2023. [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded and will be available for replay on the company's website at www.radcom.com later today. On the call are Eyal Harari, RADCOM's CEO; and Hadar Rahav, RADCOM's CFO. Please note that management has prepared a presentation for your reference that will be used during the call. If you still need to download it, you may do so through the link in the Investors section of RADCOM's website at www.radcom.com/investor-relations. Before we begin, I would like to review the safe harbor provision. Forward-looking statements in the conference call involve several risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the company's statements about its full year 2023 revenue guidance, the potential to scale up to a midsized software company, levels of gross margin, operating expenses and head count, expected growth in 2023 and beyond, expectations regarding the enterprise market for telecom operators, including trends in the market and the effect of general economic conditions, continued investment in and benefits from research and development, as well as sales and marketing. Its expectation to gain further interest from operators and play an important role in facilitating the transition to 5G, the potential to leverage continual technology and products to the benefit of RADCOM, its expectations about its pipeline opportunities, leadership position, AI and cloud strategies, increase in market share and momentum, further demand for its products and growth, the company's expectations with respect to its relationships with AT&T, Rakuten, DISH, and potential grants from the Israeli Innovation Authority. The company does not undertake to update forward-looking statements. The full safe harbor provisions, including risks that could cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements are outlined in the presentation and the company's SEC filings. In this conference call, management will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures, which are provided to enhance the user's overall understanding of the company's financial performance by excluding certain noncash stock-based compensation expenses, acquisition-related expenses and amortization of intangible assets related to acquisitions, non-GAAP results provide information helpful in assessing RADCOM's core operating performance and evaluating and comparing the results of operations consistently from period to period. The presentation of this additional information is not meant to be considered as substitute for the corresponding financial measures prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Investors are encouraged to review the reconciliations of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures included in the quarter's earnings release available on our website. Now I would like to turn the call over to Eyal. Please go ahead.

Thanks, operator. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for our second quarter 2023 earnings call. This quarter, we achieved several all-time financial records, and continued investing in our solutions to drive future growth. Revenues for the second quarter were $12.4 million, the 16th consecutive quarter of year-over-year growth. We significantly improved our bottom line, achieving net income for the second quarter and first 6 months of 2023 that hit a 5-year high. The improvements in our profitability KPIs continued our strong momentum and are driven by strong execution and revenue increase. At the same time, with a robust business model, our software-centric company delivers high gross margins and recurring revenues, driving the business and providing good visibility into the future. A note on the business strategy, we announced last month the nomination of Mr. Andre Fuetsch to the Board of Directors. His nomination will be voted for at the AGM tomorrow. Andre has served in various senior executive positions at AT&T, the most recent of which was the Executive Vice President and CTO of Network Services. We are excited that Andre has accepted our invitation to be nominated. And I believe he will contribute significantly to the company's strategy and future growth. Turning to the 5G market. With uncertainty around the macro economy, some operators may take longer than others to roll out 5G, expand on transition to stand-alone 5G. Still, the market direction is clear, and we believe our position as a leading assurance provider for 5G will continue to drive positive returns. Not only does 5G complexity require assurance to help manage the networks with extensive automation, but operators also work in a highly competitive environment. They are under pressure to control costs and streamline their processes. So they also look to assurance and automation…

Thank you, Eyal, and good morning, everyone. To help you understand the results, I will refer mainly to non-GAAP numbers, excluding share-based compensation. Now please turn to Slide 8 for the financial highlights. We achieved record revenues in the second quarter, reaching $12.4 million, representing a 16th consecutive quarter of year-over-year revenue growth and an increase from $12 million in the first quarter of 2023. Second quarter revenue grew by double digit with year-over-year growth of 11.2%. This resulted in non-GAAP net income for the quarter of $2.1 million, a 6-year high. At the same time, we continue to manage our expenses while investing in the business strategically and efficiently. Our gross margin on a non-GAAP basis in the second quarter of 2023 was 73%. Please note that our gross margin may fluctuate between the quarters depending on the revenue mix. We expect that the third quarter will remain at a similar level. Our gross R&D expenses for the second quarter of 2023 on a non-GAAP basis were $4.4 million, a decrease of $290,000 compared to the second quarter of 2022. We received a grant of $180,000 from the Israel Innovation Authority during the quarter compared to $197,000 in the third quarter of last year. As a result, on a non-GAAP basis, our net R&D expenses for the second quarter of 2023 were $4.2 million compared to $4.5 million in the second quarter of 2022. We expect the Israel Innovation Authority grant in the third quarter to be on a similar level. Sales and marketing expenses for the second quarter of 2023 were $3 million on a non-GAAP basis, an increase of $480,000 compared to the second quarter of 2022. G&A expenses for the second quarter of 2023 were $929,000 on a non-GAAP basis, an increase of $88,000 compared to…

[Operator Instructions]. The first question is from are Arjun Bhatia.

Yes. Perfect. Eyal, you called out in your prepared remarks that the macro might have -- might be starting to have some impact on the 5G rollout at some telcos. Can you just elaborate that on a little bit? What are you seeing? How might that impact your business from a downstream perspective? And how severe or minimal are these pushouts?

So yes, as mentioned in the prepared remarks, we all see the macro economic pressure on -- in general, and we see some operators reporting reducing some of the CapEx spend as part of their alignment to the new conditions. In general, we are still confident on the market evolving into 5G, and we still see a demand for our products. And as we executed well this quarter, we expected our growth journey to continue. We do still see that 5G is strategic to top operators, and they are still progressing with their 5G programs and continue to spend into evolving to 5G stand-alone, and by that, creating the demand for our products. We are seeing 2 -- I would say, 2 separate influences. One is that our solutions with automation and AI are helping operators to save and be more efficient with their staff. And under this environment, this is highly required. And this is 1 of the things that enable and excite our customers and potential customers, would drive more demand to our requirements. And in parallel, we see some operators spending less on the 5G, which obviously we are targeting those operators, and it might slow things down. So I think those 2 things are kind of balancing, and we continue to see the demand is solid. We still have a solid pipeline, and we will continue to monitor the market advancement into 5G, but what's important is that strategically, it's all going towards the right direction.

Okay. That makes sense. That's helpful. And when you think about some of the newer capabilities that you've launched, you launched VDT with Continual, what does adoption of that look like? How do you think that plays out over time? And is that something that you incorporate into your core platform, something you might have separately? How are you thinking about the strategy there?

So we are continuing to add more and more innovation around analytics and automation, and the newly announced offering with a virtual drive test or VDT is definitely part of it. It also aligns with what mentioned before, our operator desire to find better ways to manage the operations and do things in a more advanced way, in a more efficient way. And VDT is definitely answering this news. We already started and we are in a good shape with the integration between the Continual product lines and RADCOM, and this is all going to be part of our portfolio, while we are still offering the VDT as a stand-alone application on top of existing data sources the operator where you can provide. And obviously, you can get more value while you take the full package integrated with RADCOM ACE. We start in this stage, we just concluded the acquisition in May. And in the last few months, we are marketing this new offering. We are meeting our existing customers, new customers, and overall, the message is very positive. We really have new opportunities in our pipeline. As we know, sales cycle in telecom is taking time, and we expect to see some of the results in 2024.

Okay. That's helpful. And just last 1 for me on the Google Cloud partnership. It sounds like you have some customers that are live with ACE on GCP already. How does your customer base differ between the 3 big clouds you have all 3 now? Is there 1 that you have more exposure to? I'm trying to figure out, I guess, how big of an opportunity this is now that you have GCP in addition to Azure and AWS on your platform?

So first, our vision, our strategy is that we are aiming to be the leading solution in the cloud environment, and hence, we want to be available for any cloud choice that the operator is preferring. We know different operators we choose strategic partnerships with different cloud providers, some with AWS, some with Azure, some in Google. And we want to be -- to have our portfolio available for all of them. We build a product and architecture, so it will be cloud native and by that easily available on all different platforms. And we see in some cases that some operators are using the mix. They want to have multiple cloud providers in order to have sometimes best-of-bread into different applications, sometimes in order to have to minimize the strategic risk backing all the workloads into 1 cloud platform. So we are -- our approach is to be available on all the leading platforms to expand our market -- addressable market and availability. Google is very powerful in Europe. They are also very powerful in the analytics space. We are happy to see Google now added to our portfolio, and this new partnership is also extending the activity that was done around continued product lines in the last couple of years. And our -- the fact that we are now available also on the Google marketplace is opening us more dose. We are not betting, as I said, on 1 direction. We are looking to continue maintaining the integrations with the key cloud providers. And every one of them that is successful is good for us as all the migration into cloud is major and accelerate of adopting our technology. As when operator move from legacy architecture into play, this is what drives the opportunity for us. So we will be happy to cooperate with all cloud providers and more success for them is usually more success for us.

[Operator Instructions]. The next question is from Alex Henderson of Needham & Company.

So great quarter, and thanks for the nice prints pretty consistently. I'm looking at the number here and thinking you've got an acquisition that's adding 6% to the OpEx line. And I'm wondering if there was some of that in the June quarter or was that more of a sequential increase into the September quarter? What you think OpEx should look like in both the third and fourth quarters? Is this going to be 5% or 6% above the $8 million that you just did or what?

So thank you, Alex. We already incorporated the operational expense of the acquisition in both. The results are better than expected due to both some advantage of the ForEx and the weakening of the shekel, we gained some benefits as well as higher than usual gross margin. We are expecting operational expense ForEx to be in a similar level with some increase, as I mentioned before, that we are continuing to invest into sales and marketing. But we already, let's say, the step function that we mentioned last quarter is already in most -- in the numbers.

So am I thinking then that given the run rate revenues in the back half of the year is going to be at the midpoint guidance -- it should be higher in 3Q and 4Q? Or is there some offsets because you're running well ahead of Street expectations for the year so far.

So we reiterate our guidance in terms of revenue, and we are still looking to do in the $50 million to $53 million range, which means that we are likely to have higher second half of the year in terms of the revenue. And if no change in the ForEx, and we execute on our plans, then we continue to perform strongly for the rest of the year. And we also see similar trend on the bottom line.

Right. So I mean, mechanically, that would suggest that you're going to crack $1 million in profit at the operating level in both 2Q and the ups from the first half EPS level. Is that a -- point?

This makes sense. Again, under the current environment and ForEx conditions, it definitely give us this potential.

That's helpful. In terms of the end markets, and I certainly get the macro impact commentary. But we are actually hearing that there's a deeper root problem with the 5G open core -- cloud-native core, that there's operational challenges that have come up that have undermined the ability of the service providers to continue to ramp their business. There was obviously very weak results at both their products and in Nokia in the 5G, particularly in the U.S., where U.S. operators are more cloudified than international operators. We've heard that they're cutting back on spending in 5G because of that and specifically cutting back even on the RAN investments because of that. Can you comment on what you're seeing in terms of the efficacy and the performance of the existing 5G core technologies? And whether there is any change in the willingness of the key customers to continue to push down that path given what we're hearing from the field is some operational challenges.

So overall, and I think this is the most important, operators are strategically investing into 5G stand-alone. This direction continues. We don't see any operators happy taking with that. And actually, we are seeing more and more operators joining into this strategic investment with more and more commitment. This being said, it's true that this is a very complicated technology. It requires the cloud environment. It's introduced some complexity that the telecom industry still didn't solve. But it's also important to add that we are -- the complexity means that there is more need and more value for our solutions. And therefore, while things are taking time and are likely to take time, as an industry, we are still trying to figure out how to play smartly in the 5G network. We see that it's moving forward. We see companies like DISH and Rakuten continue to be very bullish with 5G and with others. This is something that is as an industry will be solved. And later operators that during the game, it will be easier and easier for them. I think that most of the weakness reported by companies like Nokia and Ericsson is driving from less spending to the radio, which is they covered a lot of the sales sites in North America, where the -- most of the population are based and maybe the higher value customers are based. And due to the economy, they are slowing down with their implementations. But in the cold, we are continuing to invest. This is eventually what would drive new services and new revenues. And what remains now is the complexity, and I'm positive that this is something we will overcome as an industry, and we'll continue to do so and identify those use case that create a return on investment.

One more model question. The interest income line rates have been going up -- a similar sequential increase in the interest income line as we saw in each of the last couple of quarters where it's gone up pretty nicely, a couple of hundred thousand dollars plus sequentially? Or should we flatten it out at the current level?

Alex, where we experienced decline of the interest rate. So we expect the financial income to be lower in the next quarter.

Expect the interest income to come down a little bit in the September quarter?

Yes, of course.

More along the lines of the first quarter level. Is that right?

Yes.

The next question is from Charles Elliott of Inflection Point.

I'd like to ask a specific question about VDT, virtual drive test. At the moment, I understand that companies, including Google, Apple, HIA, TomTom have vehicles driving around gathering data for 3D map making, and this is a major investment. Would you be selling to those companies, selling in competition with those companies? And would your channel be the mapmakers or the telecoms companies and the telecoms companies then go into competition with the mapmakers?

So the virtual drive test application is still offered to our traditional customers, the mobile operators, the 5G carriers that are looking to optimize and ensure the customer experience on their network. They are traditionally, we're using vehicles in order to go around different geographies of the country in order to see what is the quality of service. This is very tedious, very costly, not so green. And we are adopting an approach that is taking the analytics and base use available data points in order to emulate and create what we call the virtual drive test, which not only save on costs and more green, but also provide you much more information in terms of 24/7 analysis and in much better coverage. So go-to-market approach is very similar to our port with our RADCOMize product. We see synergies between the 2 products so definitely going into our installed base and other prospects as an add-on and is an advantage and is our key approach as well as continue to promote it as a standalone solution as it complements the RADCOMize, but it can continue to run as a stand-alone leveraging the valuable data that the operators already can provide.

I'm sorry. So it's an extension of your quality assurance. It is not a mapmaking device?

Yes. The extension of our quality assurance that could be as a standalone or is an add-on.

And second question is on R&D. At the gross and net levels, this is still very high R&D spend, but it's down year-on-year. Why is that?

So the R&D expense is, as mentioned, we are looking to maintain on a similar level. We do see that percentage-wise, we will see increase. As we increase the revenue and keep the R&D level in a similar number, the percentage-wise, we invest less in R&D. This quarter, we had a onetime increase in the level due to the acquisition of Continual and the onboarding of their R&D into our teams. This is why we have the incremental expense that should be our new working level. But we are looking to maintain the R&D level in similar numbers, again, taking the consideration of fixed FX. And while we continue to grow on the top line, this should be allowing us to see improvement as we proved in the last couple of years significant improvement on the bottom line.

I see the leverage around the R&D. But 3 months ended June '22, your GAAP R&D number was $5.15 million, and it fell to $4.77 million in the latest quarter. Is that just currency making for having a funny impact? Or has there been a -- in any way a cut in your R&D spend?

It's primarily FX change, that the shekel weakened, and therefore, our numbers in dollars are a bit lower. With some optimizations we did -- along the beginning of the year, as I mentioned in previous calls.

This concludes the RADCOM Ltd. Second Quarter 2023 Results Conference Call. Thank you for your participation. You may go ahead and disconnect.