Thank you for standing and welcome to the Remitly’s Fourth Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. I would now like to introduce your host for today's program Stephen Shulstein, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon and thank you for joining us for Remitly’s fourth quarter 2021 earnings call. Joining me on the call today are Matt Oppenheimer, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Remitly; and Susanna Morgan, our Chief Financial Officer. Our results and additional management commentary are available in our earnings release, which can be found on the Investor Relations section of the website at ir.remitly.com. Please note that this call will be simultaneously webcast on the Investor Relations section of the company’s website. Before we start, I would like to remind you that we will be making forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws, including, but not limited to, statements regarding Remitly’s future financial results and management’s expectations, and plans for the business. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees and involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to vary materially from those presented here. You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Please refer to our earnings release and SEC filings for more information regarding the risk factors that may affect our results. Any forward-looking statements made in this conference call, including responses to your questions, are based on current expectations as of today, and Remitly assumes no obligations to update or revise them whether as a result of new developments or otherwise, except as required by law. The following presentation contains non-GAAP financial measures. For a reconciliation of each of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP metric, please see our earnings press release, which is available on the IR section of our website. Now, I will turn the call over to Matt to begin.

Thank you, Stephen and thank you all for joining us today for our fourth quarter earnings call. Before I begin, I want to take a moment to acknowledge the heartbreaking events in Eastern Europe. We see the pain of those who are affected, we ache for the lives lost, and the implications of this crisis. There's no easy way to transition now to our prepared remarks, but it's important to me that we pause and make space for acknowledgement and empathy of the situation. With that, I'll now turn to our results for Q4. Remitly is a mission-driven company, focused on transforming the lives of immigrants and their families by providing the most trusted financial services on the planet. We're committed to making business and investment decisions that are rooted in customer centricity. Performance in the fourth quarter demonstrated that our customer-led approach is attracting more and more loyal customers, including a 50% increase in active customers compared to a year ago. Additionally, we saw our approach drive full year revenue growth of 78% to $459 million above the top end of our guidance range. In our last call, we discussed the four pillars that allow us to uniquely serve our customers and gain their trust and loyalty by delivering operational excellence and a seamless user experience. These differentiated pillars that drive customer value are our mobile-centric platform, our global network of funding and disbursement partnerships, our localization at scale, and our data-driven proprietary technology stack. I covered the first two pillars in our last call. So, I'll begin this call with our third pillar, which is localization at scale. At Remitly, we operate under the principle that remittances are global, but customers are very much local. Understanding our customers at a deep local level, and delivering localization at scale…

Thank you. To reiterate Matt's comments, we delivered a very strong Q4, which cast-off a strong 2021. I'm going to structure my comments today around the high level drivers of our fourth quarter performance and will then provide more detail on our outlook for 2022. As a reminder, I will discuss non-GAAP operating expenses and adjusted EBITDA in my remarks. These metrics exclude non-cash items such as stock-based compensation and donation of common stock in connection with our Pledge 1% commitment in all periods. Reconciliations to GAAP results are included in the earnings release. Now, let's turn to our fourth quarter results. Revenue grew 69% to $135 million above expectations, driven both by strength in active customer growth and average revenue per active customer. Active customers grew by 50% year-over-year to $2.8 million. Spend volume grew 64% year-over-year to approximately $6 billion. Our active customer growth was driven by our best-in-class mobile platform, localized customer experience, and by investments in acquiring new customers at strong unit economics. Our five year LTV to CAC for 2021 was over six times and the strength in our unit economics underpins the investments we're making in new customer acquisition. As we've indicated, we will be investing aggressively with a priority on driving long-term profitable growth with an appropriate payback guardrail. We are expanding marketing channels, continuously testing products and incentive of options, and finding more efficient ways to driving this growth. We are seeing success even in a market where customer acquisition costs have returned to more normalized levels compared with unusually low costs during the early months of COVID, when many advertisers pulled out of the digital market. In addition to new customers, our active customer growth is also driven by strong customer retention. The trusted relationships we foster with our customers, the…

Certainly. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Tien-Tsin Huang from JPMorgan. Your question please.

Thank you so much. Great growth here. Great to see it. A couple of questions if you don't mind. Just thinking about the outlook for 2022, any change in thinking around volume versus ARPU expansion as drivers to get to the 32% to 34%, curious of design change there?

Yes, Tien-Tsin good to hear from you. So, in terms of volume, we don't run the business by send volume primarily. We do think that ARPU, it was a driver of the outperformance in Q4 and we do think that increasing ARPU will continue to be a driver for the business going forward. We're seeing really exciting trends in terms of more transactions per customer and really solid customer cohort behavior. And so we would expect going forward to see some modest increase in ARPU in 2022 as well.

Good, good. Glad to hear it. So, just my quick follow-up. I know Susanna you mentioned Q1 should look a little like Q4, I guess, the last couple of years, I know pandemic is tough to read too much into it, but you did see a little bit of sequential revenue improvement first quarter versus fourth quarter. I know we've got geopolitical things going on, FX volatility, and Omicron fading. So, just trying to better understand what's considered here in your call out for the first quarter? Thanks.

Yes, it is -- there's a lot of moving parts here, but Q4 is very seasonal for Remitly as many customers return to send over the holidays and conversely, Q1 does typically represent a slow season. We still think it will be a very strong quarter with high year-over-year growth and after that point, revenue will continue to increase sequentially each quarter after Q1 as we benefit from new customer acquisition and the high retention and engagement of our existing customers.

Got you. Nice work you guys. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Andrew Schmidt from Citi. Your question please.

Hey, Matt, Susanna, Stephen, great results here. Good to see the durability of the model come through. I just wanted to dig in a little bit on the piece sort of the enhanced engagement you've been seeing, is it more a function of newer cohorts coming on that are transacting more and generate more ARPU? Is it expansion across the base as a whole, just curious to get more color on just the increased engagement on the platform because it feels like that's a -- clearly a significant factor on fourth quarter than more significant in 2022 than we previously thought? Thanks a lot.

Yes, thanks Andrew, good to hear from you. We did see more customer activity from existing customers, both old and new compared to historical patterns. So, I wouldn't say it's isolated to a certain cohort or anything like that. In general, what we're seeing is as I mentioned, more transaction frequency and I think we're benefiting from a few programs. We have some customer engagement programs which are informed by the analytics for able to collect and then product enhancements as well that impact loyalty and encourage repeat behavior. As Matt mentioned, the one around sideline races, one example. We also are focused more on direct integrations as an example that has the best, better customer experience. And so we're also seeing higher revenue per transaction in addition to the transaction frequency driven by pricing changes, et cetera. So, I don't think there's one isolated factor, but the most significant factor is that more transactions per customer.

Very helpful. I appreciate that. And then good to see the strong unit economics illustrate in 2021. As we think about 2022, just maybe some comments about how you're thinking about customer acquisition costs on a like-for-like basis. And you do -- is there any -- have you seen any increasing competitiveness there? Obviously, you have a little bit of informational advantage here in terms of customer acquisition, but just curious what the outlook is for CAC heading into 2022? Thanks.

Yes, hey Andrew. Good to see you and appreciate the question. I think that if you look at our LTV to CAC ratios, which window of five years, even though a lot of customers end up staying with us for longer than five years, it's -- continues to be at that 6x LTV to CAC ratio. So, for every dollar we're investing, we're getting $6 back in a five-year window. And I think that that gives us an enormous opportunity to continue to invest in the business at high ROI. And we've seen stability around some of the overall customer acquisition cost and unit economics broadly. But we want to be aggressive there because we think we have approximately 1% of the overall market, we've got great unit economics and we've got a market that's rapidly shifting digital and a clear ROI for capturing that shift and continue to grow the business in the long-term.

Got it. Thank you very much, Matt. Good results, guys. Appreciate the comments.

Thanks Andrew.

Thank you. Our next question comes from a line of Will Nance from Goldman Sachs. Your question please.

Hey, guys, good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions. I just wanted to ask on the guidance. You've seen really nice revenue momentum over the last couple of quarters and so far, your guidance has worked out to be kind of conservative. I just want to know, if you were to outperform your guidance over the course of the year, where would you kind of expect that most likely come from is it? Is it higher? Is it new products? Is it just better customer growth? And then second, how do you think about letting any outperformance flow to the bottom-line versus reinvesting in growth initiatives?

Yes, I'll start answering that. And hey, Will, it's -- appreciate the question. I'll start and then I'll turn it over to Susanna with any additional detail. But I think, yes, we're excited and really proud of to be guiding to $605 million to $615 million, up 32% to 34% year-on-year, which is rapid revenue growth for our stage and size. It's also early in the year. So, we think it's the right guidance on an annual basis and we have high confidence in the guidance that we're providing, especially when you put it into context how we think about our guidance. We have over 90% revenue retention, as I mentioned, and we do a lot of rigorous forecasting at the cohort level. So, we have clear visibility into Q1 as Susanna mentioned, which is up significantly year-on-year. And then we're confident in the guidance as we get later into the year. In terms of the reinvestment and where outperformance could come from, I think the three areas I mentioned of continued to invest at the right unit economics, primarily on customer acquisition, continuing to expand geographically, and then adding additional products are the three areas that we want to invest. And those three areas have a portfolio of timelines of the returns. And so to the extent we're adding more new customers this year, I think that that could -- that that has opportunities for outsized growth. And then similarly, with geographies, new products are going to be further down the road, but we like the portfolio approach. So, we can drive the sustainable rapid growth for the years to come not just in 2022.

Appreciate all the color. And then maybe if I could just ask the question on the transaction margins and just maybe some more intermediate term thoughts on bottom-line. You've seen pretty good year-over-year improvements in the transaction margins, could you just kind of talked about the biggest couple of pieces that are driving that? And how much more progress we could see on better transaction margins? And then more broadly, at a higher level, markets become increasingly focused on profitability in this market. What are you guys thinking in terms of timeline towards profitability? And has anything changed about the thought process around investing, just given everything going on in the markets?

Yes, so I'll start off the question on transaction margin. So, we have seen some nice improvements in transaction margins over time. And generally, the factors that are contributing to that are we're seeing -- we have more scale, so we can negotiate better rates with some of our partners. We're continuing to do more direct integrations with -- which both have a better customer experience and are lower cost. And then the more data we have to feed into our loss models, the more accurate those models get as well, which is one of the other transaction expenses. So, we'd expect to continue to see some modest improvements in transaction margins over time as well, which is good to see that leverage in the business model.

Yes and I can take the question around profitability. Will, I think that one of the things that I really appreciate about our business is the leverage that we've already started to see in it. And you can look at that, if you look again at our -- even our marketing line item for 2021 as a percentage of the amount that we're actually spending on an adjusted EBITDA basis, we're investing in growth, because we see the kind of 6x LTV to CAC ratios that that we mentioned. We're investing in growth in the other two areas, new geos and new products, because of the size of the market and because we want to deliver long-term growth such that when we eventually think about profitability down the road, it's a much larger business that has higher absolute profitability. And so I think the timelines for that depend on those three investments that we make and how the arc of those investments go. But the leverage that we've already been able to produce in the business, the inherent profitability that exists within remittances, and the kind of 20% long-term adjusted EBITDA guidance does not change. It's just about the investments we're making again for the long-term.

Got it. Appreciate all the color. Thanks for taking my questions guys. Nice results.

Thanks Will.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Bob Napoli from William Blair. Your question please.

Thank you very much for taking the question and nice quarter. And I thought the guide was pretty good to start the year. But just any color you can give on the -- I mean you called out the LTV to CAC ratio, but the marketing account per -- cost per account -- the cost of adding accounts, are you -- what kind of changes are you seeing there are? You're still obviously comfortable? We went through unit economics quite a bit, but are you seeing any changes in the unit economics or the cost per count?

Thanks Bob, good to hear from you. So, in terms of CAC, in general, we have talked previously about during COVID, CAC was it a unusually low levels and it has recovered. Q4, we do see some seasonality in CAC as well, it's just a more competitive advertising landscape during the holidays, typically. I'd say despite that obviously; our unit economics remain very strong at the over six times LTV to CAC. And so we feel confident that we should definitely continue to invest in marketing and drive new customer growth as well.

Thank you. Then any -- can you give any color on any business you have around Russia, Ukraine? Or are you affected all by the some of the payment systems there changes in Swift or anything like that? And I just had one short follow-up.

Thanks Bob. Yes, appreciate the question. I think first and foremost, as I mentioned at the outset, just our thoughts are with the individuals whose lives are being significantly disrupted right now. And also supporting our employees and customers across Europe, especially, but really around the globe. So, that's first and foremost, and foundational is to go without saying. From a strictly business perspective, we have minimal exposure to the region, Russia, Belarus, Ukraine are not material, they're less than 1% -- far less than 1% of active customers. And so we've disabled transactions connected to Russia and Belarus and we continue to serve customers in Ukraine, but it’s a negligible part of our business. And most importantly, we're just thinking about those in the region that are affected and our team, employees, families or other connections to the region.

Understood and appreciate that. Then just quickly any update on Remitly for developers, any progress you're making there, any strategic thoughts?

Yes, absolutely Bob. So, Remitly for developers, which most folks know is our B2B offering that gives businesses the opportunity to disperse through our network of billions of bank accounts, hundreds of millions of mobile wallets, and hundreds of thousands of cash pickup locations across the globe. And we have continued to roll out new customers, we have a strong pipeline there. The one you may have read about is our Coinbase partnership that we launched and we're excited about continuing to partner with innovators in the space to capture new use cases and to expand the TAM that we can serve. And I -- what I'd say at a strategic level is we've talked about and you've seen some of the crypto players, which is a great way for us to innovate and stay close to what's happening in the space. But we have a really strong pipeline of other non-crypto players as well. And when we have competed in RFPs and other elements that our network has really differentiated, given how strong we've built it for our customers and how much of a need there are for other businesses to disperse funds in emerging markets and the wide range of ways that I mentioned.

Thank you, Matt. Thank you, Susanna, I appreciate it.

Thanks Bob.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the lobby of Ramsey El-Assal from Barclays. Your question please.

Hi, thanks for taking my question this evening. You mentioned some dynamics around pricing and I was just wondering if you both could give me some more, kind of, commentary on your pricing strategy in terms of the mix between taking specific actions as opposed to just benefiting from favorable geographic mix? And I guess has anything changed in terms of us thinking about pricing as a more meaningful kind of recurring input to your growth algorithm?

I'm happy to start with that, Ramsey. Overall, as we mentioned, our pricing trends have been favorable. Our ARPU, average revenue per user, was up 13% year-over-year. And the other context is that take rates have been very stable, above 2% over the past seven quarters. So, we feel good about our pricing. And the reason why we feel good is because of the fact that we know why customers choose us and continue to come back to us with that 90%-plus revenue retention. And that's because of the peace of mind we deliver, the seamless user experience that's only getting better and better with our scale. And so we've seen strong pricing. As I mentioned earlier, we're not always the best price, we provide a fair price and customers come to us because of the peace of mind and reliability and great service that we provide.

Okay. And then maybe as a follow-up here, could you comment a little bit on Passbook and it -- you sounded pretty confident about it being kind of a longer term ARPU driver, just kind of curious sort of where you are in the sort of rollout and development of the product, kind of, sort of like what gives you confidence about its long-term prospects?

Yes, absolutely, Ramsey. Thanks for the question. So, the way I think about the long-term vision of where we're headed, is really around improving the lives of immigrants and their families by providing the most trusted financial services on the planet. And as we've talked about, as I mentioned, I think that our customers who are primarily immigrants are often underserved when it comes to financial services, products and so Passbook is what we've talked about the most in the past. And I think Passbook is foundational for building broader financial services for immigrants and having that direct deposit account is critical, it's foundational. And the way to think about our longer term vision, what we're doing is yes, we're continuing to invest in that product, but we're also investing in multiple customer centered investments around solving broader financial services, pain points that we see that our customers have. And so when you go through that portfolio of investments, additional products is the one that's the furthest off as is with new businesses and new products. But we're as confident and as excited about offering broad financial services to our customers with Passbook being an important part of that, given the direct deposit, the DDA account being at the center of a lot of customers financial services.

Got it. Sounds like an important future building block. Appreciate your comments here. Thanks.

Thanks Ramsey.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of David Scharf from JMP Securities. Your question please.

So, yes, good afternoon, and thanks for taking my questions. They pretty much all have been addressed at this point. But Matt, I did want to follow-up on one aspect of kind of, the ARPU outlook and how we ought to think about the core drivers. Near term of the revenue guidance and specifically it sounded like frequency was kind of the biggest contributor and I would imagine there's probably a practical ceiling on how often somebody sends money in a single user? Can you also shed light on whether or not corridor mix, particularly among the big three has an impact or how that would impact it going forward as the big three sort of decline as a part of the overall mix. And also whether just given the FX margin, the opposite of the operating leverage inherently associated with just a higher volume percent. And whether we should be thinking about an impact of inflation in the U.S. is impacting revenue per transaction as well?

Why don't I -- why don't you take the initial parts, and then I can talk about inflation at the end.

That’s great. Thanks for the question. So in terms of ARPU, you're right that the primary driver is our active customers sending more transactions. And I mentioned a few things that product enhancements and marketing programs that are actions we've taken to drive that loyalty and engagement. In terms of most of our active customers are transacting at least two times a month and so that's something that we have seen in the past, frequently might be after a payday or something along those lines, and really reinforces that it is a recurring need, and they are supporting their families back home on an ongoing basis. In terms of the question, does this corridor mix impact that much? There's -- there probably are some differences across corridors, but that off the top of my head, it's not significant enough necessarily to call out. We are continuing to diversify away from our top three corridors, which were U.S. to Philippines, we already started, and then Mexico and India, also some of the largest remittance corridors in the world. But I think ARPU is generally quite strong across corridors. And so I don't think there's anything specific to call out in terms of corridor mix impacting that that metric in particular.

Thanks Susanna, and -- go ahead.

No, I'm sorry. Matt, you were going to discuss whether or not inflation is something we should be paying attention to the price of currency?

Exactly, we have not seen an impact on -- from inflation on our customer base is the punch line. And I think that if you look historically, our customer base is incredibly resilient and we've seen them have during economic recessions during various geopolitical, even natural disasters, at times customers and increase the amount that they sent. And our customers, it's important to keep in mind are typically sending money home to their families, and a few $100 goes an incredibly long way and is very high on their kind of use of funds. And so with that context, again, we're not seeing any impact from inflation, it's something we'll also -- we'll obviously continue to watch closely. But we feel good and quite frankly, inspired and honored to get to serve a customer base that prioritizes sending money home, regardless of the economic conditions, given how far those funds go to their families back home.

Just one, one proof point to kind of follow-up on that average, spend per active customer increased to over $2,100 in Q4. So, that was a year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter. So, obviously, our customers are continue to prioritize sending money home during this, this somewhat uncertain time as well.

Great. That's all I have. Thank you and congrats on a just terrific end of the year.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Alex Markgraff from KeyBanc Capital Markets. Your question please.

Yes, hi, everyone. Thanks for taking that question. Just a couple of quick ones. Maybe first, appreciate all the commentary on transaction margin expectations. Just anything to note around the quarterly cadence of OpEx in 2022, thinking about how to, kind of arrive at quarterly EBITDA margins, I'd appreciate color there. And then just to kind of follow-up on the Coinbase partnership, should we think about the kind of revenue model in commercial terms as similar to other partnerships you have announced with crypto companies with respect to RFP?

Sure, I'll let Susanna take the EBITDA question and then I'll talk about Coinbase.

Yes. So, just in terms of -- good to see you ask us your question around EBITDA or expense seasonality. Our investments are front-loaded in the year 2022. So, we would expect EBITDA to be lowest in Q1 and then generally improve during Q2 and Q3, and then Q4, we'll see some impact on marketing expense due to the typical new customer seasonality in Q4, but we would expect Q1 to be the lowest of the year. In terms of other seasonality on other line items, or just in general, marketing expense I've talked about before and just mentioned Q4 is typically higher, the one other it's a non-GAAP item, but in Q3, we will make our Pledge 1% stock donation, which is part of G&A GAAP cost. So, that will be an impact in Q3 in terms of -- not so much on EBITDA, but on the net loss in Q3.

Yes, thanks Susanna. And then on broader RFP, kind of, unit economics, the way that we think about it is -- and the business model is a mix of fee and foreign exchange. Generally, it depends on the specific partner and I can't talk about Coinbase specifically, obviously, but what we like about that business is the fact that from a profitability perspective, it's very advantageous to us and their strategic benefits to more transactions flowing through our system, because it gives it more leverage with our partners, the ability to invest more in our network, which helps both our remittance consumer business as well as the overall RFP offering. So, mix of fee and foreign exchange, generally, with a nice profitability profile on a unit economic basis for that business.

Great. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question is a follow-up from the line of Tien-Tsin Huang from JPMorgan. Your question please. Have your phone unmute. Tien-Tsin, we're not hearing anything. Well, that does conclude our question-and-answer session today. I'd like to hand the program back to Matt Oppenheimer, CEO for any further remarks.

Great, thanks so much and thanks everyone, for the thoughtful questions. And as we do at Remitly, I like to end the meeting by highlighting another of our amazing customers, and this customers name is Mila. She first started using Remitly in 2013, so well over the five years that we mentioned earlier, to send money from the U.S. to her loved ones in the Philippines. And here are her words about Remitly. I am the mother of four children, a wife, and a loving grandmother. I'm working abroad to help my family augment the income that we have. I work hard because I want my children to study, get their degree, and be able to work and stand on their own two feet. It is tough to be away from my family, work is hard as well, but I am thankful for my children who studied well finish their studies, and now they are happy working on their own. I thank Remitly for being there for me and making it easy to send money to my country. So, we thank Mila and we thank the millions of customers that continue to use our platform and we thank all of you for being on the call and being part of the Remitly journey. We are excited about 2022 and we are looking forward to continuing to share our progress as we continue to work to accomplish our mission.

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, for your participation in today's conference. This does include the program. You may now disconnect.