Vikas Mehta
Analyst · Zachary Gunn from FT Partners
Zach, I'll take that, and I'll start in the reverse order. Let me start with the second part of your question and then move to first. Look, if you think about the take rate part of your question, I would go back to what we have shared over the last, call it, 4 quarters, which is our North Star metric is the long-term RLTE or Revenue Less Transaction Expense dollars. And that's a much better indicator of our business. And the reason is, to some extent, all the things you mentioned, like take rate is impacted by a lot of different factors from transaction size to corridors to pay-in, payout types to customer segment mix. And especially, as you may have seen, we have made a few important bets over here with Remitly business with the high amount senders. And even as Matt was saying, the innovator's dilemma point, we have been able to be aggressive as we think about high amount senders. That's an area where, as we mentioned, we have been more experimental where we have made price investments. And there's nothing we have to lose over there because it's a new market for us. So overall, we feel that long-term RLT dollars is a much better metric, and that's where, as you pointed, even though our gross take rate went down, our year-over-year RLT dollars grew over 23%. Moving to your other question with regards to Q4 and FY '26. I'd say a couple of additional comments in addition to what we had shared earlier. The first one I'd say is that H2, and we've talked about it before also, in general, it is a much tougher comp. And if you look at Q3, Q4 last year, we had very strong revenue growth. And that is a tough comp to go against. So that's one reason. The second is, if you look at EBITDA and the expense side of the guide for Q4, Q4 is an important quarter. This is where we'll be making important marketing investments and setting up for a strong FY '26. Again, we'll be measured, we'll be disciplined. But hopefully, that gives you some additional context.