Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Repligen’s 2023 Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. My name is Keith, and I will be your coordinator. Please note that there will be a question-and-answer session following the company’s formal remarks. In order to accommodate all individuals who wish to ask questions, there will be a limit of two questions at a time. Please also note that today’s the event is being recorded. I’d now like to turn the conference over to your host for today’s call, Sondra Newman, Head of Investor Relations for Repligen.

Thank you, Keith, and welcome, everyone, to our third quarter of 2023 report. On this call, we will cover business highlights and financial performance for the quarter and year-to-date and provide an update on our full year financial guidance. Repligen’s CEO, Tony Hunt; and our CFO, Jason Garland, will deliver our report, and then we’ll open the call up for Q&A. As a reminder, the forward-looking statements that we make during this call, including those regarding our business goals and expectations for the financial performance of the company are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual events or results to differ. Additional information concerning risks related to our business is included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, and other current reports, including the report that we are filing today and other filings that we make with the SEC. Today’s comments reflect management’s current views, which could change as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The company does not obligate or commit itself to update forward-looking statements, except as required by law. During this call, we are providing only non-GAAP financial results and guidance unless otherwise noted. Reconciliations of GAAP to non-GAAP financial measures are included in the press release that we issued this morning, which is posted to Repligen’s website and on sec.gov. Adjusted non-GAAP figures in today’s report include the following: book-to-bill ratio, base business revenue, revenue growth at constant currency; cost of sales, gross profit and gross margin; operating expenses, including R&D and SG&A; income from operations and operating margin; pre-tax income, income tax, net income, diluted earnings per share; as well as EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA. These adjusted financial measures should not be viewed as an alternative to GAAP measures, but are intended to best reflect of our ongoing operations. Thank you. Now I’ll turn the call over to Tony Hunt.

Hey, thanks, Sondra, and good morning, everyone, and welcome to our Q3 earnings call. As you know, 2023 continues to be a challenging year for our company and the overall bioprocessing industry as we navigate macro headwinds, primarily destocking in the CDMO and pharma sectors overall capital conservatism and China weakness. Despite these challenges, we believe we are beginning to see the first signs of recovery play out here in the third quarter. As noted on our August Q2 call, we highlighted our high probability opportunity funnel as indicative of future order demand and projected that these orders would close in late Q3 and Q4. I’m happy to share that our commercial team closed out many of these late-stage funnel opportunities in the last half of the quarter with the majority of these orders now scheduled for delivery in the first half of next year. Our strengthening order book through the third quarter where orders were up 16% sequentially supports our position that demand for Repligen’s products is starting to recover. Our book-to-bill 1.07 for the quarter was very encouraging and was primarily driven by large pharma accounts, which were up 50% sequentially and modest growth from CDMOs. Regionally, Europe and North America showed the strongest sequential and year-over-year order gains. The highlights in the quarter was gene therapy, which delivered solid revenue and order growth. About 20% of our total revenue in the quarter came from gene therapy accounts representing growth of 11% year-on-year. Within gene therapy revenues filtration chromatography analytics were up in the quarter. More importantly, the average spend from our top gene therapy accounts was upgraded than 25% year-to-date as customers continue to scale. Order growth was also strong up over 50% year-on-year and close to 20% sequentially. The gains in gene therapy are coming from…

Thank you, Tony, and good morning, everyone. First, let me say that I’m thrilled to be a part of the Repligen team. It’s been a busy first month in my role and as you can see and you’ll hear this morning, my focus is on optimizing our spending and rebalancing resources to ensure we are in a better position on margins when we kick off 2024. The team has been great and I look forward to picking up where Jon left off and supporting and continuing to provide clarity on the company’s financial and operating performance. Today, we reported our financial results for the third quarter of 2023 and updated our financial guidance for the year. We expected Q3 to be the lightest quarter of the year, and total revenue came in at $141.2 million with no COVID sales in the third quarter compared to $29 million in COVID sales in the third quarter of 2022. This was a year-over-year decrease of 30% as reported and 31% on a constant currency basis as we continue to navigate through the macro headwinds in our industry. FX provided a slight tailwind in the quarter, and based on current conditions, we expect no significant impact from FX for the full year. Our base business, which excludes COVID related revenue and revenue from acquisitions was down 18% on a reported basis and 19% at constant currency. Tony shared the revenue performance for our franchises, but let me highlight the revenue performance across our global regions. For context, North America represented approximately 50% of our global business in Q3, while Europe and Asia Pacific and the rest of the world represented 34% and 17% respectively. The absence of COVID revenue in Q3 versus the $29 million in the third quarter of last year contributed to…

Yes. Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] And today’s first question comes from Jacob Johnson with Stephens.

Hey, thanks. Good morning, everybody. Welcome, Jason. Tony, you mentioned 2024 that’s clearly the focus of the inbounds this morning. So you’re pointing to sequential growth in the first half. But it doesn’t seem like year-over-year growth and then both year-over-year and sequential growth in the second half of the year. That would imply something below your LRP next year and maybe a wide range at that, should we assume some form of year-over-year growth, I think consensus is looking maybe for something around high single digits organic growth next year, just any way to kind of frame up the magnitude of growth next year understanding it’s early?

Yes, Jacob. I think it’s going to be hard right now to put a number on 2024. I think there’s a high degree of confidence given what we’re seeing in the second half of this year that the first half of next year is going to improve and it’s going to be better. The magnitude of how much better? I don’t know right now. And I can also say that as we go through the year, we fully expect that orders are going to continue to improve. For us, in this quarter though was really key, right? We needed to see some change in the order pattern and it’s early, but I think it was very positive to see pharma up greater than 50%. So it really depends on how Q4 plays out, how Q1 plays out before we start calling. How much growth do we see in the first half of next year versus second half, and then year-over-year? Is that flat? Is that down? It’s hard to tell right now.

Got it. Fair enough. And then maybe for the follow-up, Tony, you all called out strength from gene therapy customers. I think there’s a lot of debate right now about what’s going on in cell and gene therapy. It seems like maybe there’s strength at the later stage of things while maybe earlier stage demands weaker. Just curious kind of what you’re seeing in that market right now and then any changes to kind of your long-term outlook for that opportunity?

Yes, gene therapy, we’ve been pretty consistent as we talk about the gene therapy market this year. Our growth is coming from late stage and commercial wins. And it’s coming from those accounts that we talked about at the – on our Q4 2022 call where we said that we had 20 plus customers that were $1 million plus spend with Repligen. That’s where our growth’s coming from. You’re spot on when it comes to the kind of smaller players in the market, it’s been soft, right? It’s definitely been a lower activity market in 2023 versus what we saw last year. I expect though that that’s going to change. And when you look at a normal bioprocessing year, whatever normal is going to be right now. I would say that it’s a pretty clear that gene therapy can be a 20% plus grower somewhere in that 20% to 30% range. But you’ve got to get back into normal market conditions before you kind of can call that.

Got it. Thanks for taking questions.

Thank you.

Thanks, Jacob.

Thank you. And the next question comes from Conor McNamara with RBC Capital Markets.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the call. Just first on margins, if you look at your margin guide for this year, and it’ll imply a second half margin well below 15% or so. How should we think about that going into next year? And how quickly can you get back to pre-pandemic level EBIT margins?

So, Conor, we’re obviously, as I’ve started, I’ve spent a lot of time getting in the details on our margin and most importantly, understanding what the actions we’re taking and what we need to continue to do. You can see in our guide that we’ll be stepping up in the fourth quarter right from where we were at a low point in 3Q. But I think there’s still a lot of work to do to understand where we are in 2024. Certainly, I think we’ll be able to improve, but right now we’re not going to issue guidance yet on our 2024 gross margins.

Okay. Thanks. And just on the pharma order strength, can you – how much of that strength was from new customers versus continuing projects and just what’s different than what you talked about three months ago in relation to pharma spend?

Yes. We could see Conor right in Q1 that pharma spend dropped off just a little bit. But it wasn’t a trend. And then Q2, it was really weak. I think what we were able to do in Q3 was the high probability funnel that we talked about on our Q2 call. We’re able to close out on that. And what we saw was existing customers some new, but I would say majority are existing customers. Moving forward with Phase 3 in commercial projects and placing large orders with deliveries in kind of the first quarter, second quarter of next year. So I think it’s very encouraging that the order pattern has increased. I’d like to add that having essentially finished the month of October, right, as of today, we can say that the order strength has maintained itself through October. So again, another data point that I think is positive for Repligen.

Great. Thanks for that color, Tony. Appreciate it.

Thank you. And the next question comes from Dan Arias with Stifel.

Good morning guys. Thanks for the questions. Tony, on the order of book improvement, good to hear that come in the way that it did. Are you able to ballpark the percentage of the business where things actually improved? It sounds like it’s pharma gene therapy, not so much CDMOs. So if you were to sort of crystallize or simplify that, what might that look like assuming you have that number handy?

Yes. No, it’s absolutely pharma and CDMO or not CDMOs, but pharma and gene therapy. If you go back to what I said, we were 50% up on pharma on orders sequentially. We were 23% up on pharma on orders year-on-year. Our gene therapy strength in orders again was 50% year-on-year, 25% sequentially. CDMOs inched up a little bit in the quarter. But I would say CDMOs remain sluggish and have not really recovered from where we were in Q3, when it dropped off dramatically in Q3 of last year. So the way I look at it is, if you add up kind of pharma and gene therapy in one bucket, that’s probably about 50% of the revenue the company is coming from those two buckets. And then somewhere between 40% and 50% is coming from CDMOs and what we call integrator/OEM and those – that side of the ledger is just hasn’t moved.

Yes. Okay. That’s helpful. Thanks. And then maybe on Chromatography, can you just touch on resin availability there? And at this point, whether you think that you might start 2024 off with that just no longer being a constraint, that seems like an area where growth next year can be about more than just the backdrop – the industry backdrop. So curious about the way in which you’re thinking about starting off 2024 in that particular segment? Thanks.

Yes. There’s no doubt that resin availability has continued to improve as we’ve gone through the year. I think the piece for us that’s maybe changed is it’s hard to predict what percent of our customers are going to ask us to procure resin to pack the columns, especially outside North America. So kind of Europe and Asia are the two regions where we’ve had more Repligen and that’s impacting the growth that we’re seeing on the Chromatography side. And when we look at like Q3, our volume is up, right? So when you look at the number of columns that we’re producing and shipping, it’s going up and it’s going to continue to go up. When we get into next year, I think you’re right. I think resin availability should be less of an issue. I mean, I think it’ll be normal. For high volume resins, it’s probably going to be in that six week to nine week period. But for large, much larger volumes, it’s going to be probably closer to 12 weeks, 13 weeks. But again, that’s really the discretion of the big suppliers of resins. But yes, I agree more visibility in 2024, and it should be back to a more normal year for our Chromatography business.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. And the next question comes from Puneet Souda with Leerink Partners.

Yes. Hi, Tony. Thanks for taking the questions. And Jason great to have you on Board. And so Tony just wanted to clarify, I think you said first half 2024 sequentially should improve from second half of 2023. And then expecting that you are going to grow further from that in second half of 2024. So I mean, it’s fair to say that 2024 should grow versus 2023. It’s just hard to sort of quantify the magnitude. And I appreciate that. So I just wanted to clarify that. And then ultimately, do you think the 15% to 20% base business growth algorithm that you have for the longer term, is that still intact?

Yes. Maybe start with the 20% base business growth in the longer term. We see no reason why our business can’t grow at that level. We have a highly differentiated portfolio of products. We’re bringing new products to market. We’re seeing traction in the field. We have less competition on a per product basis. So I think long term and normal years for bioprocessing, we should be able to grow at that level. When you talk about next year, it’s just, you’re right. It’s hard to quantify what growth could look like next year. But remember, what we’re talking about is base business growth, not overall, because remember we had some COVID-related revenue in 2023. But yes, look, when we get to the February call, we’ll obviously be telling you exactly what 2024 is going to look like, and we’ll probably – when we get to the three, four months from now we’ll have a much better idea as well about the order run rate. Order run rate is what’s key to the growth. And I think we’re happy that Q3 finished strong and the start of Q4 has been a good start to the quarter for us as well on orders.

Got it. And then on the gene therapy side, just wanted to clarify, when you look at the progression of sort of the Phase 1s to 2s and how the products are getting approved and getting into the commercial, how they’re getting commercialized. Are you feeling confident that sort of as we go into 2024, Repligen will continue to be levered more and more to phase – later phases and later stages of the drugs and continue to see growth from that. I guess the main question is sort of the sustainability of the gene therapy progress that you’re seeing here. And sort of how much of the order book contribution is really sort of coming from gene therapy versus mAbs. Thank you.

Yes. I think on gene therapy, we’re a little bit of a proxy on the industry. Remember, we were in early. We’re well embedded in small, medium, and large gene therapy accounts. So as the progression happens from Phase 1 to Phase to Phase 3 to commercial, we should follow that very much in parallel. I can’t tell you what it’s going to be next year because I think you still have to see what happens with drugs that are up for approval this year. But if you take like the top 25 accounts, they’re all scaling at the average dollar spent of those accounts is going up. So I think that’s also a really positive sign for us.

Got it. Okay. All right. Thanks, Tony.

Yes. Thanks.

Thank you. And the next question comes from Matt Larew with William Blair.

Hey, good morning. If I think about some of the differences between perhaps your CDMO customers relative to pharma or gene therapy, is there anything to call out, whether it’s modality exposure, control of a pipeline, perhaps different level of inventory stocking and now destocking, regional exposure, anything that might point to why there’s sort of that discrepant recovery right now?

Yes. I think on the CDMO side, there was clearly a lot of inventory build, and I think that’s a big part of what’s going on. There is a lot of activity happening at CDMOs. We do expect that as we finish off the year, we get into next year, CDMOs are going to improve. We’re having lots of conversations. There’s a lot of projects out there. We kind of have to close them and I’m just talking about Repligen, and I’m not talking about the market in general, but we have some opportunities in CDMOs. We’ve got to do some execution over the next couple of quarters, and that should really help us in 2024.

Okay. Thanks. And then on China, sort of another couple months since we last spoke to observe what’s going on there. Anything to update either from a competitive perspective, macro perspective, or customer perspective.

Yes. On the macro side, I – not a whole lot has changed. It’s still a tough environment. I think you hear it from all the players on the life science tool side talking about what’s going on in China. We don’t expect any recovery until we get into next year. There’s a few pockets of goodness, but it’s just counterbalanced by stuff that’s not happening. So yes, China hasn’t changed much at all over the last three months.

Okay. Thanks.

Thank you. And the next question comes from Matt Hewitt with Craig-Hallum Capital Group.

Good morning. Congratulations on the improvement that you’re seeing and thanks for the update. Maybe first off kind of digging in a little bit more on the destocking, would you say that we’re pretty close to being done with that process as you speak to your CDMO customers? And at this point, is it more a function of some of the funding and just some of the conservatism by some of the – their pharma customers, or what do you think is maybe the hold up there?

Yes. I do think destocking is getting better. But it’s still there and I think it’s going to take the rest of the year to kind of get out of the hole that we’re all in on dealing with the high levels of inventory. I think your second comment is definitely accurate, which is there’s been conservatism on the pharma side and I know projects have been delayed. We talked about that in Q2, there was definitely project delays and I do think that that is something that kind of hurts the overall industry. What’s encouraging is that Q3 bounce back much stronger than we were anticipating, especially within pharma, and you would expect that that should flow across into CDMO over – CDMOs over the next couple of quarters as well. So we’ll see how it goes. I think we’re cautiously optimistic, Matt.

That’s great. Thank you. And then I realize it’s very early days, but a month in or so, on the Metenova acquisition, how’s the integration going? What has the feedback been from your customers those types of things. Thank you.

Yes. On Metenova, it’s been very straightforward. They have a – the majority of their business is a stainless steel, they call it reuse business. That’s a different channel than we sell through. So we’ve been working very closely with the leadership team at Metenova meeting with their channel partners. We’ve got some meetings next week with a larger group of channel partners. So I expect that that business, it’s right on track to hit the numbers we’re expecting it to hit in Q4 on track for next year. I think the big part that we have to do over the next 12 months is take the technology that they’ve implemented and the stainless steel format and start to move that across into single use, marry it up with the bag technology that we have from FlexBiosys and really become a bigger player in the single use bag side of the market. So that’s kind of our goal. We kind of have to keep two sides of the equation running and we’re really happy with what we have and what we can accomplish.

That’s great. Thank you.

Thank you. The next question comes from Tim Daley with Wells Fargo.

Great. Thanks. So Tony, two earlier questions on orders. You called out order strength has maintained itself through October, and then to another question, you called out CDMO integrator OEM customers orders haven’t moved. So just want to confirm those are both could be interpreted on an October basis as well as a quarterly basis.

Yes, I have not, Tim gone and looked at the October orders by kind of segments. I’m just talking about total orders in and October have remained strong, but I haven’t done an analysis to see is that exactly the same pharma versus CDMO that we saw in Q3.

All right. That’s helpful, but – okay. And then just thinking about pricing, was there any use of promotions or discounting or anything in the quarter has that stepped up? What – I guess what was pricing in the quarter or easier way to guess ask this, was the apples-to-apples price increase in revenues higher than the apples-to-apples price increase in orders?

Yes. I would say that through especially at the end of Q3, we’ve typically run a promotion on some of our small bench top systems. We’ve done that in prior years. You’ll see that on our website. That’s a pretty standard kind of tactic that we’ve used in prior years. Nothing different in 2023 versus what we’ve done maybe two, three years ago. And I would say price, Jason, it’s maintaining towards that kind of 4% or 5% range per the year. So I think we’re on track for what we said we were going to do in price at the beginning of the year. And I don’t think any of the smaller promotions that we’re running really impact price per the year.

All right. Great. Thank you.

Thank you. And the next question comes from Rachel Vatnsdal with J.P. Morgan.

Great. Good morning. Thank you for taking the questions. And so I wanted to follow-up on some of the earlier comments around gene therapy. Obviously, you saw some nice strength there this quarter. We’re getting a number of questions just on that Sarepta data that was released last night where EMBARK failed to meet its primary endpoint. So can you walk us through how meaningful the customer is Sarepta and how big of a contributor was that for 3Q for orders and revenues? And then going forward, how does the EMBARK data and that failure there change anything in your gene therapy expectations going forward?

Maybe I’ll start with the second part of your question. So I saw the same reports probably as you did, and I think it’s in really early. I’m sure the results are disappointing, but there’s still a submission that has to happen to the FDA. And I think we should all sort of wait to see how that all plays out over the next couple of months. We don’t comment on which drugs we’re in. I think what we said, and I’ll probably reiterate, we’re in the majority of the commercial approvals that happened this year. But we have 20, 25 accounts right now that are tracking well in terms of scale up and you’re going to see bumps in the road. And I think when we get to next year, I think it’ll be cure, where are some of the drugs that got approved this year, what their volumes might be in 2024.

Got it. And then just wanted to follow-up on some of the comments around order book trends. So nice to see that orders grew 13% sequentially this quarter. Can you just walk us through the monthly exit rates on that order strength? And then you mentioned that order strength has continued into October, so can you clarify what that means? Was that a continued step up in orders, meaning, growth beyond 13% sequential or is that really stable to the 13% that you saw this quarter?

And Rachel, just to be clear, what your first question was monthly trends in the quarter, is that what you said?

Yes, yes. So exiting like what were order rates in September, for example.

So I would say that July, August and September that each month got better. We had a very strong September. October, if you looked at kind of the average for the year. It’s well above what we’ve seen in other months, but not September. We had a very strong September, as we said in my prepared remarks, second half of the quarter orders picked up. We’ve maintained a strong order trend in October. But I’m not going to comment on, hey, four weeks in October is better than four weeks in July or four weeks in August. It’s significantly better than what we were seeing in Q2.

Perfect. That’s it for me. Thank you guys.

No problem.

Thank you. Thank you. And the next question comes from Dan Leonard with UBS.

Thank you. First question on 2024 framing, I appreciate it’s early to guide 2024 gross margin, but Jason, you mentioned that margins should improve. And was that comment made using the second half of 2023 as a baseline or would you expect gross margins to improve from the full year 2023 result?

Yes. So certainly versus the second half of 2023. So, again, a lot of similar framework that we – as Tony’s talked about for revenue. But so, again, we continue to try to appropriately right size the company. We feel that we’ve got a path to improvement, but again, it’s just an early read in terms of what that looks like for the year in terms of the guide, but certainly a step up from where we were in the second half of 2023.

Understood. And then I have a follow-up on China. Tony, I was wondering if you could comment on order trends in China, specifically, and reflect on how important is that region to the long-term growth algorithm of Repligen?

I think it’s – yes, it’s clearly important. China orders last year or China revenue last year represented about 10% of our total business, but remember about a quarter of that came from COVID. So three quarters came from what we call base. So it’s easy to do the math, it’s about $60 million, we’ll be down probably 20%, 25% this year on base. And we just need to move back into recovery, it’s not a huge number, but it’s an important region and we want to do well in the region and I think we have a really good portfolio of products that are differentiated and there’s no reason why we can’t grow and we’re not overly concerned about local competition. It does exist and what really needs to happen is the macro environment needs to get better. We have a lot of accounts there that we work with, that we like, that like Repligen, so expect that when China turns it should be an improvement for us as well. And orders have remained light in the really – all through this year, it’s been – the order trend has been light. We’ve had a – we had a strong order backlog going in coming into 2023, which made the revenue numbers for China in Q1 and Q2 were much better than what we were bringing in then versus orders. So it should get better as we move through 2024, but it’s all macro driven.

Appreciate that. Thank you.

Thank you. And the next question comes from Justin Bowers with Deutsche Bank.

All right. Good morning and thank you. Just one on the cadence entering 2024 is the 4Q exit rate sort of a good jumping off for 1Q and 2Q of next year.

From a revenue point of view, from a margin point of view, from both?

Yes. From a revenue point of view.

Yes. I think – yes, so the one thing that Q4 has that Q3 and Q2 didn’t have is COVID. So I think you – when we get to our Q4 results, I think the base business in Q4 is a good jumping off point, which will be improved versus Q3. So we’re expecting that things will get better as we move into Q1 and Q2 next year. And I think that’s also reflected Justin in the fact that a lot of the orders that we’re talking about that we got at the end of Q3 and here in early in Q4 are going to get delivered in the first and second quarter next year.

Got it. Thank you. And the gist of that, it was just you were referencing growth over one half of this year versus second half of this year. So I just wanted to just clarify this, the quarterly cadence.

Yes, but it’s based business.

Yes. Okay. And then just in terms of orders, and I know the business has transformed quite a bit over the last few years, but is there – when you look across your accounts, are there differences in order patterns or certain seasonality just either by account or by geography? I mean we see that in some of your peers and just also noting that you do have a unique and different mix of business. But at a high level, is there any way you could characterize sort of like the seasonality, whether it’s by customer or by geography on sort of a normalized basis as such a thing exists anymore?

Yes. It’s a great question. I would say that this is not an – we know it’s not a normal year, so trying to really draw conclusions on order patterns in what’s being like a topsy-turvy year between inventory build and destocking and then conservatism on capital spend and delayed projects. I think the way I look at it, Justin, is a little bit like, are we beginning to see improvements in our funnel, right? And that is what’s the most encouraging piece for me is that, even though we’ve had a good order quarter in Q3, we’ve been able to replenish that 50% and above probability funnel in the same time period. So that’s what’s encouraging is that there’s more opportunities moving through, which is spread across pharma and CDMO and integrators. So that’s what I’m looking to see, what progress do we make in Q4, what progress do we make in Q1? I think trying to draw a conclusion on order patterns as we’ve gone through this year isn’t going to tell us a whole lot about what the future’s going to look like.

Got it. Okay. Thanks, Tony.

Thank you. And the next question comes from Brandon Couillard with Jefferies.

Good morning. Jason talked about some SKU rationalization planned. Can you just touch on which segments that will affect and whether it’ll be a headwind to revenues? I imagine that’s not for programs that are already commercial, but any more color and share on that? Thanks.

Yes. Brandon, it’s really just focused on the COVID related business that we had. So it’s at a SKU level that we’re either it was COVID or demand is no longer there, so nothing that affects any go forward from a base business perspective.

Mainly filtration. Okay. And Tony, what do you expect to cell and gene therapy customer base to do in terms of revenue growth in 2023 now? I think that had been flat. I’m just curious if that changed.

I think – and I don’t have the exact number, but I would say, it’s probably flat year-on-year, which is not bad considering the rest of the market’s been this year.

Thank you. And this concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to return the conference over to Tony Hunt for any closing comments.

Great. Thanks everybody for joining us. Look forward to chatting with everybody in a few months time and hopefully close out 2023 and talk about improvements in 2024. So look forward to catching up then. Thank you guys.

Thank you. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending. Today’s presentation. You may now disconnect your lines.