Good morning and welcome to the New Residential First Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Bohe Yu . Please go ahead.

Thank you and good morning, everyone. I’d like to thank you for joining us for New Residential’s first quarter 2022 earnings call. With me today are Michael Nierenberg, Chairman, CEO and President of New Residential; Nick Santoro, Chief Financial Officer; and also Baron Silverstein, President of NewRez and Caliber. Throughout the call, we are going to reference the earnings supplement that was posted to the New Residential website this morning. If you have not already done so, I’d encourage you to download the presentation now. I’d like to point out that certain statements today will be forward-looking statements. These statements by their nature are uncertain and may differ materially from actual results. I encourage you to review the disclaimers in our press release and earnings supplement regarding forward-looking statements and review the risk factors contained in our annual and quarterly reports filed with the SEC. In addition, we will be discussing some non-GAAP financial measures during today’s call. Reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures can also be found in our earnings supplement. And with that, I will turn the call over to Michael.

Thanks, Bohe. Good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining us. As we all know, there is lots of pain and suffering in the world. As we think about everyone who is in need of help or a payer, we send out our warm wishes and hope for healing and then end to the war as soon as possible. Now on to business, despite the volatility in the markets, our company had a very good quarter. As we have mentioned during prior calls, we have positioned our company for a higher rate environment, taking all the necessary actions to protect our portfolios and operating companies from rising interest rates. During the quarter, our book value increased to $12.56. Currently, our book value sits at approximately $13.50. We have interest rate hedges in place, which protect our long duration assets, along with our MSR portfolio, which should only help to increase our book value as we go forward based on expected Fed actions. We have increased our cash and liquidity levels to $1.7 billion. We will be patient as we look for opportunistic investments across the financial services sector. We believe patience will be rewarded in these markets and the first quarter was a great example of our diversified business. Regarding our operating companies, the integration of NewRez and Caliber will be done by the end of Q2. As we previously mentioned, we expected sales in the area of $175 million to $200 million. As we go forward, we believe that number is light and we will likely have more sales in excess of the $200 million number. We initially mentioned, as we think about our homeowners, we are looking for more ways to be able to offer them loans, products and other ways to support our homeowners as we go forward. As…

Thanks Mike. Good morning, everyone. As Michael mentioned earlier, the current macro environment has changed dramatically over the last few months. Sharp increase in interest rates has certainly slowed refinance volumes and are pressuring origination margins overall. However, for NewRez and Caliber and coupled with our partnership with NRZ, the market environment proves the benefit of a balanced origination and servicing business. It’s shown in our performance for the first quarter with pre-tax income of $787 million, which includes an MSR mark-to-market gain of $631 million. We originated approximately $27 billion in funded volumes, which is a 29% decline quarter-over-quarter and increased our servicing portfolio to $497 billion notional servicing balances. With our reduction in originations, our MSR and sub-servicing will continue to provide the stabilization in a higher interest rate market. Over the past two quarters, we have been talking about our integration progress of NewRez and Caliber and we continue to see successes through implementing best practices between both companies. We expect to exceed our initial run-rate synergies target of $175 million to $200 million by the end of the year and we will have finalized our origination channel integration by the end of the second quarter, as Michael talked about. But now our focus has shifted to aligning our business to the current environment. We continue to take steps to lower our overall cost and be disciplined in managing our capacity, while ensuring we deliver the best experience for our employees, customers and partners. But even with the current origination headwinds, we continue to evaluate opportunities in our sector to maximize the value in our platform. Turning to Slide 19, the origination division ended the first quarter with approximately $26 million in pre-tax income and approximately $27 billion in pull-through adjusted lock volume, which is a decline…

Thanks, Baron. Just two quick slides or a couple of quick comments. Page 23 is really just about our operating companies. This will grow over time as – again, as I pointed out, we will be in the commercial space. Once the markets settle down, we have a couple of things we’re working on that we’re very excited about. And then finally, on Page 24, how we think of ourselves and set ourselves apart. We like to think of ourselves as not just a REIT, but really an investment manager allocating capital appropriately across different investment strategies. No need to continue to talk about the MSR portfolio. Cash and liquidity, I think this is a really important note. $1.7 billion of cash and liquidity today. If you go back a couple of years ago, if we deployed $1 billion of that $1.7 billion and just think about it this way, if we deployed that, let’s call it a, even use a 12% levered return, that would be an extra $120 million a year in earnings. So if you think about that with roughly 480 million ish shares of 470 million shares, it’s substantial – that would be a substantial pickup to core earnings in our business. We’re just simply not going to go there because we do think we will be rewarded having a much larger cash and liquidity on our balance sheet today as we go forward. Our ability to manufacture assets, I think that truly differentiates us. We will be extremely prudent. We are in a horrible market for mortgage origination. It’s only going to get worse. Gain on sale will only get worse. And I think you’re going to see a lot of folks actually have to really pull back in that business. Thus, that will create some great opportunities for us on the MSR side. We haven’t seen a ton of it yet, but I do think that will come going forward. And then as we think about our track record, being a steward of shareholder capital, we really care about making returns. Our numbers are good. And with that, I’ll turn it back to the operator, and we can open up for Q&A.

And our first question will come from Bose George of KBW. Please go ahead.

Hi, everyone. Good morning. Thanks for the book value update. I was just curious, what does that imply in terms of servicing valuations? And then how much room is left for further MSR valuation increases, if we see rates continue to trend up?

So at the end of the quarter, Bose, our weighted average MSR multiple was approximately 4.5 or 4.49. As we look forward, taking the 10-year treasury rate, which at the end of March 31 was 2.34. If we go up 100 basis points, now I quoted a book value of approximately 13.5 today, up 100 basis points, we project an MSR multiple of about 4.89, and the change in book value would be $700 million. So of that, some amount of that is already captured, but you’d likely get to somewhere between $14 and $15 in book value on the company.

Okay. Great, thanks, that’s helpful. And then on your subservicing contract with Ocwen that ends, I think, in July. I mean is there any benefit to moving that stuff to your own platform or is that just too delinquent? Or just how do you think that plays out?

Obviously, we have a good working relationship with Ocwen. I think there is more to come. We will likely keep the portfolio with Ocwen. We have discussions with them frequently on that, and I think you’ll see something hopefully in the near future come out on that.

Okay, thanks. And then just actually one more. On servicing technology, have you made plan about consolidating onto one platform or where is that progressing?

So we’re currently on two different platforms. One is Service Director, which is the legacy Shellpoint system. And then when we acquired Caliber, Caliber essentially fired Sagent and went to MSP. We’re currently in discussions, as you could imagine, with a number of different parties regarding what would be best for our company and what we think will be best for the market and there could be some equity component that comes along with that. We’ve had discussions with all the likely players in the marketplace, and we will continue to do so, and we hope to have a decision on that shortly.

Okay. Great. Thanks a lot.

The next question comes from Kevin Barker of Piper Sandler. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Thank you. Could you discuss some of the initiatives that you’re putting in place to reduce operating expenses in the origination channel? And whether you’ve considered bigger structural changes, whether that’s reducing the amount of channels you’re in or just focusing on retail and correspondent? I was just wondering if there is anything structurally you’re looking at on the origination side in order to sustain profitability? I understand you have a significant amount of cost synergies that are coming in place from the Caliber merger. You also alluded to additional cost saves there, but obviously, it’s a very difficult environment. Anything you can add as far as what you’re looking at on the origination side?

Look, everything – Kevin, everything is on the table from the perspective of us to make sure that we maintain profitability. Our view is, and that includes from our technology perspective, from – and how we evaluate each of our businesses. So we like the ability to be in all four channels. We want to make sure that each of our channels are profitable on a fully loaded perspective. And that is where we are today and our expectation is that, as I talked about, as we continue to drive additional products, as we continue to build out additional partnerships with our existing partners and continue growth is the way that we will continue to – the way we will succeed.

And Kevin, just on that front, Baron spoke about fully loaded units. Every single day, we look at each channel to say, does that break even or make money? And part of the calculus when you think about where we are in this business, we will get – we’ve gotten significantly smaller over the first quarter and into the second quarter on the origination business. Each unit we produce, we want to make sure that the channel in that unit is making money when you fully allocate corporate and all expenses to that channel. So to the extent that we don’t think we can make money in that channel, we will either pull back much more significantly or will get out. And I think where we are now is we pulled back significantly, our volumes are down a lot. In my earlier comments about this being a horrible market for mortgage origination, I think that continues as we go forward because there is so much capacity in the system, as we all know, and people are going to be fighting for units. That’s not going to be us. We will roll out different products. I mentioned before about – Baron mentioned – I mentioned HELOC, Baron mentioned HELOC, we have non-QM jumbo and maybe some of the other things. I would like to see us become a real full-scale financial services company, roll out other types of products to our customers, which I think could offset the decline you’re going to see in gains in the origination business. But we’re not going to do something for the sake of doing it to compete against some of the larger originators in the market. We don’t need to compete for a conventional loan or a Ginnie Mae loan, unless – the other – the flip side of that could be is we love the MSR value and we think it’s going to go up limits. Now on the MSR value side, we all know at some point that they get capped because they have negative convexity they only go up so high. Where we are now, in Bose’s question about, essentially our market 4.5, we think there is plenty of room to go. But at some point, we will be extremely mindful that we don’t think they are going to go up a ton more and the risk-reward is skewed to the downside.

I mean just a follow-up on those comments. The servicing multiples that we’re seeing in the market today approaching 5x, in some cases, transactions that are pushing 6x servicing fee. I mean do you feel like it’s – you’re getting to a point where you could start hedging or putting in place some type of instruments to protect the value given that we’re, I would say, probably the highest servicing multiples we’ve seen post financial crisis?

Yes. No, it’s a good question. The – there is room to go. New production MSRs have, I think, have a five handle right now on the conventional side. If you think about it, if you put a hedge, if you get long an instrument against that and the 10-year goes to 4%, the Fed funds go to – I’m looking at some charts this morning, Fed funds – one of our economists see short this morning that shows Fed – their projection is that Fed funds rate goes to north of 4% in 2024. And if you look at the Fed futures, the implied Fed futures, we go to 3.5% in the middle of, call it, ‘23, getting along a fixed income asset that has duration will just go down in value. It will protect you if the market obviously goes the other way. I think in that case, I’d rather keep more cash reallocated to, I pointed out, in the investment business. You could generate – we think right now, if we deploy capital with proper financing, we’re going to be able to deploy capital in kind of a mid-teens type returns. So I think we need – and this is where we go back to being really an investment manager and not a REIT. We have to think about how we deploy capital across the different paradigms. So we’re not just going to originate mortgages to originate mortgages and take on undue risk.

Yes. I’m just saying like could you buy a significant amount of ADC MBS at this point and – by utilizing that cash to buy those assets that would probably have a countercyclical type asset class versus the MSR while still retaining some yield?

Well, think about it this way. You’re originating an MSR, let’s say, 5.5 you get long a Fannie 3% coupon, that 5.5 will go to 6 and your Fannie coupon is going to go down 10 points. So I don’t – I mean at some point, we may get there if we think we go into recession, quite frankly. But I don’t – right now, we’re not going to fight the Fed and we’re not going to fight what treasury is going to do around the mortgage basis.

Okay. Thank you for the questions. Thank you, Micheal.

Thank you.

The next question comes from Eric Hagen of BTIG. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks. Good morning, a nice quarter. Do you guys have any perspective on the liquidity and capital rules which FHFA and Ginnie Mae are in the process of modifying right now? And how that might drive the approach to capital management, if at all?

Why don’t we let Nick handle that one?

Sure. So I’m sure you’ve read the FHFA all the comment letters that have gone back. As the industry has put out the expectation is as written, the rules would increase capital, call it, 3x current requirements, we believe the FHFA is listening to the industry and those requirements will come down. We’re comfortable with our liquidity position in meeting the requirements as written, and the requirements as we ultimately think will align.

Great, thank you. And then with MSRs appreciating in value, is there the opportunity to achieve a higher advance rate on those assets with secured funding? And can you remind us of the current secured funding, how much is fixed versus floating?

So the answer to your first question is yes, right? As the value of the asset goes up, theoretically, your LTV is going down. So you could create more equity. Thus, when you look at our $7.1 billion of net equity at the end of the quarter, a lot of that’s been due to the MSR asset. When we look at our funding, essentially most of it is – it’s either – most of it’s in the capital markets that’s fixed. We do have some stuff with some of our banking partners, which is either locked in with fixed or it is floating. And then on the other side, we have strategic interest rate hedges on our own balance sheet, which offset the rise that we’re seeing in the Fed funds rate. So, leading to that same question in my comments earlier about us hedging our fixed rate or assets that have duration with interest rate swaps. Our entire balance sheet has interest rate swaps, which will protect us towards higher rates. That also is applicable to our Genesis business where when you look at those loans, they are fabulous. They are give or take, 8% coupon, initially your 7%, 8% floating rate loans. As they sit on our balance sheet, we get ready for their securitization or working with our banking friends from a financing standpoint, we have hedges to protect us in the front end as we do believe Fed funds are going to continue to increase. So across all of our different asset classes that we have, we’re biased more to the short side, but – and then going back to Kevin’s thing, if we thought we’re going to enter into a recession, we would just – we’d immediately adapt to a longer rate bias. But right now, I think everything is protected on the balance sheet from an interest rate hedge standpoint, our financings with our bank friends are protected as we have these assets on our balance sheet with front-end swaps, so we feel that we’re more than covered or more than protected for the rate environment we’re in.

That’s very helpful. Thanks you, Michael.

Thanks, Eric.

The next question comes from Doug Harter of Credit Suisse. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Michael, I was hoping you could just help quantify, you said you want to run with kind of more liquidity, just I guess how should we think about how much of that $1.7 billion of cash and liquidity today is kind of investable? How much of that are you kind of saving to be opportunistic if there are deals that come around or would you kind of put it into the teens returns that you see available today?

Yes. I think – listen, I mean of the $1.7 billion, could it be $1 billion that could be investable, yes. Would we invest $1 billion in today’s market, the answer is no. I am not sure that the worst of what we have seen is over. I am just looking at some quotes as we are on this call, Paul Tudor Jones said, “This is the worst investing environment,” he thinks, for bonds and equities that he has seen based on the Fed being in play and what’s going on in the world. So, we are likely not just going to go out and spend money. I do think we will diversify away from some of the single-family residential stuff over time. The commercial space, again, I keep harping on that, we are going to be very patient in that space. We are making some strategic investments there, small amounts and some commercial real estate debt and things like that. But it’s going to be patients we want to get rewarded. We want to think about our balance sheet today as when we do put out that capital, one is the financing has to be great and two is that the rewards have to be 15% to 20% returns as we go forward.

And just on the commercial, something you have talked about. I guess do you feel like you have the right investment team kind of in-house already or is that something that might require kind of an investment in – or an acquisition to kind of get the right team?

Yes. No, there is – listen, we have great resources on the NRZ side. But the investing in the commercial real estate space will come with some folks. So, people that we know for a long time who have a great proven track record, who know how to make either LP’s money or shareholders’ money. So, our team here is terrific, but it’s going to – we will bring you more expertise around the business.

Great. Thank you.

Thank you, Doug.

The next question comes from Stephen Laws of Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning. I wanted to follow-up on Kevin’s question about the expenses. The sequential decline, can you talk about how much of that is tied to variable compensation related to the decline in loan originations? How much of that decline was the synergies that you guys have been able to achieve so far? And as we think about from here, are there other steps you can take or what the industry kind of overcapacity, should we expect to see more formal headcount reductions kind of across the sector with where the outlook for mortgage volumes are today?

Yes. Why don’t I take the last part of your question, and then I will refer to Baron and Nick on the – on what we have realized so far. The mortgage origination business, when we look back to 2020, we were hiring 500 people a month to keep up with volumes. And most of those folks sat at home from a remote perspective, because you needed folks to process loans, because volumes as we – if we look at last year, we did $180 billion of origination. This year, we will do $80-ish billion or something, and I don’t want to just quote a number there because it’s going to be about profitability. If we thought we can make money and reduce our costs, we would originate more mortgages. So, I do think that the industry itself every day, you read another snippet, whether it would be on Housing Wire or some other bridge that people are letting people go. It’s going to get smaller. There is just too much capacity in the system. And for those of folks that don’t reduce their headcount, what you are going to see is they are going to compete for units to try to make up for, or to substantiate headcount. As a result, there is no money. There is going to be very little money to be made per unit. So, we have taken the approach to making sure, one, we reduce our headcount, two, synergies. One thing we didn’t mention before and I think we probably mentioned in a prior call, we hired Neenu Kainth from – who has a lot of experience. She worked with Cooper on the digital marketing side. She is leading our effort there. So, when we think about our ability to either reduce costs or drive saves in technology, Neenu coupled with our Head of Technology, Dino Lack, we are pretty pumped about those two folks in those groups. So, you got to get synergies out of your business. You got to create more efficiency, but you are going to see headcount get smaller across the industry. We have made significant cuts. We don’t want to be those folks, but we need to get our business right-sized for the current environment and just move forward. So – and then as far as sales maybe you guys want to take that kind of where we are?

Yes. So, Michael did talk about it as where we were at $140 million, what I call run rate synergies. You obviously see even in our origination business, our overall expense rate from a run rate perspective is down $90 million quarter-over-quarter. We expect to see that number continue to drop with our – as we continue to forecast out where we think originations are headed for the rest of the year. With respect to what I will call the fixed versus variable, what I would recommend is just having a follow-up call and we can have a discussion on that.

Excellent. Look forward to that. As a second question, it looked like you did your first SFR securitization, your first residential transitional loan securitization. Can you talk about market reception for those? Obviously, the volatile rate spread environment, how you look at those markets and availability and pricing there going forward as you continue to grow in SFR and the resi transitional loans?

Yes. I think one is the reception to our securitization was great. The advance rate on those assets creates a truly – once you are fully leased up, north of a 20% ROE for that pool of assets. The one thing that’s really important, Stephen, is that when we look at our business, we want to make sure that we assume the capital markets are shutdown. So, when we look at the volatility that we saw in the first quarter, and that’s why we called, I think $80 million in loans, when we think about volatility, we want to ensure that all of our financing is extremely buttoned up that if there is no capital markets, how do we protect our balance sheet. And that’s the way that we are running our business today. We will have another securitization probably in the – either late this quarter, probably into the third quarter as we acquire more units. But just to be clear is, we are – right now, from an overall unit standpoint, we are roughly 3,500 units. We are very, very small. The amount of total equity in the business is small today. But we are really looking to grow that. we are in some talks with some folks about adding resources, adding operating capacity. We have some very good relationships in the industry, and this will be a big growth area for us as we go forward. We would like to – with housing affordability decreasing, we do think that cap rates need to go up a little bit. So, our entry points, we think are going to be in a very good way as we go forward.

I appreciate the comments this morning.

Thank you.

The next question comes from Giuliano Bologna of Compass Point. Please go ahead.

Good morning and congrats on a great quarter. One of the areas I was curious about just picking your brains on those – on the custodial deposit side. I am curious if you disclosed the size of your custodian deposit portfolio on the servicing side. And the reason for that is just to get a sense of how big it is and how – and kind of the direction of the size of that portfolio to get a sense of what kind of upside you might be able to have from short rates moving higher and obviously getting some additional carry income on those deposits?

Hi Giuliano, it’s Nick. Our custodial balances, we don’t disclose them in our financials, but they do run about $13 billion to $15 billion on average.

To your question, if the Fed is more aggressive and raises rates in a more, we will call it, extreme fashion you will see higher float income off our deposits.

That’s right. That was kind of what I was going to the – just like to get some of the different pieces of the model, that’s an upside and yes. As short rates move higher, obviously, if we move 150 bps to 200 bps, that’s a material impact on $13 billion to $15 billion.

And the pickup in value, Giuliano, as you know, is embedded in our MSR value.

That’s right. And then shifting topics a little bit. I realize that a couple asked very similar questions around potentially hedging or how they think about MSR values as they reach kind of closer to peak values from – in terms of looking back over the last 10 years to 15 years or so. I would be curious from your perspective, there are a lot of platforms out there, there are even a handful of public companies that are out there that have MSR portfolios may be interesting that are marked by market lower than where you have your MSRs marked and you also have some unique origination platforms showing a discount. Would you – do you have a have a preference or do you have any interest in adding more origination capabilities, or do you need something very unique on the origination side to add more capabilities there, or are you more asset focused at this point?

We have all the pieces that we need at this point. If there was a great kind of distressed opportunity on the origination side, of course, we pursue it. I think it goes back to some of your earlier comments capital allocation matters. We are not a mortgage company. We are an investment manager. We are not a REIT. So, as we think about deploying capital across financial services, for example, we have a property preservation business, named Guardian, which has a lot of third-party clients. And those guys do a great job. And that’s an example of something that’s not where we need to go out and just buy assets, so we need to go out and buy another operating company, that company will grow. Assuming that if the economy does go into a recession at some point, the earnings in that company will continue to grow, and that’s just a cash-on-cash business. So, I think the most important thing that I would like to get across or one of the more important things to get across on this call, we are sitting a lot of cash and liquidity. We don’t need to just go spend it. Our core run rate will likely be in the area of where we currently are and book value should continue to grow. But capital allocation is a big deal. Just because you are in the mortgage business, it doesn’t mean that you have to take $1 billion and go buy another mortgage origination platform or buy MSRs at a six multiple. If the opportunity comes our way, we will do that. But it’s more about how do we diversify, one. Two, and how do we deploy capital in a more meaningful way that’s going to drive higher core earnings and higher returns for shareholders. And I think that’s the point to get across.

That’s great. I really appreciate the answer and questions. And I will jump back in queue.

Thank you.

The next question comes from Trevor Cranston of JMP Securities. Please go ahead.

Hey. Thanks. One more question related to MSR valuations. You mentioned the possibility of more MSR coming out for sale as mortgage companies potentially struggle more over the course of the year. Can you talk about how much upside you guys would have for adding sort of the low coupon MSR that’s been originated over the last couple of years? And more generally, kind of how you would see returns on bulk MSR purchases today versus other asset classes you might be able to deploy capital into? Thanks.

Trevor, it all comes back to returns. You know it’s – are we going to buy a 3% gross WAC MSR at 6.5 multiple, I don’t think so. But if we could buy them at the right levels and we think we could get mid-teens returns because we think we can deploy that same capital in a different way in a mid-teens returns, I think that’s really what it’s going to come down to. We will add MSRs if we think the value is there, but we don’t need to add any more. We got $625 billion between excess and full. Can we grow that, the answer is yes. Will we, yes we can grow it organically through our origination business. And one of the things we look at every day is we say, “Okay, what’s our breakeven on the MSR portfolio, where can we originate that unit? And how do we think about the macro environment going forward?” If we think the macro environment is going to sell off, then it just comes down to saying, “Okay, can we produce that unit fully loaded at this yield? And how does that compare to, for example, when Charles Sorrentino is looking at the broader NRZ investment universe, how does that compare to him deploying capital, for example, in a AAA security on a levered basis, that’s going to be 15?” So, it all depends on – and again, it goes back to the capital allocation thing, or is there an operating business that may be in the commercial real estate side or on the consumer side that we think we are going to generate 20%-plus outsized returns. So, it’s not just a growing MSR business, it’s not just to grow mortgage companies, it’s not just to grow a single-family bond business. It’s really how do we create value for shareholders think of us as a total return manager with your capital.

Yes. Okay. It makes sense. Thank you.

Thank you.

The next question comes from Courtney Bahlman of Barclays. Please go ahead.

Hey guys. Thanks for the time here and for the questions. Really just getting in the weeds, is there any color that you might be able to provide with regards to how the quarter panned out with regards to monthly cadence pertaining to origination volumes? Obviously, the first quarter was super volatile. We started the quarter with a third year, it was 3.25%. Throughout March, we averaged about 4.5%, huge difference there and one of the things that the market and I am trying to gauge just how sticky this consumer is on the purchase side? In the past, we have seen demand drop off around that 4%, 4.5% area, and this consumer seems much more resilient to me. Do you guys have any thoughts there? And then also, any color on how April is trending so far? Really appreciate it. Thank you.

I think on the consumer side, yes, it’s – the consumer is resilient. If you look at home price appreciation for the first quarter, I think the numbers were like 13% or something across the country. I – listen, I am not an economist, and we – obviously, we read a lot into where we are. The unemployment rate continues to remain lower. People project that to go even lower as folks drop out of the workforce because they don’t want to work or they are of age and retiring. I do think right now, mortgage rates are in and around 5.5%. If you think about it this way, going back to the fourth quarter, mortgage rates have doubled the average payment for a homeowner is double and home prices are up 13% in the first quarter. I do think at some point that will impact the consumer, and you will have some slowdown. That’s just my own personal opinion. So far the trends have been, I think where the consumer is pretty strong, you have seen a lot of folks rush into, I think acquire homes in the first quarter with the expectation that mortgage rates are going up. But right now, the consumer seems pretty healthy. The flip side of that is you couple a $5 cup of coffee at Starbucks, $5 a gallon for gas, mortgage rates double, I think at some point, it has to impact the consumer. And one of the things that if you look at the mortgage banking industry with the amount of folks that are actually leaving the system, I do think at some point it plays on the consumer. We haven’t seen it yet. The consumer remains strong, probably worth looking at the data from like a BofA or JPMorgan have a large swath of data around their card business.

Alright. Thank you. Any color with regards to monthly cadence in the quarter? Anything even directionally would be appreciated. Thank you.

Relating to the consumer?

Relating to origination volumes.

Yes. I mean…

We put in the forecast already that our expectation is that our funded volume will be somewhere between 17 to 22. We expect to be somewhere in that higher end of that range. But that’s the guidance that we provided.

And it’s what related to profitability, it’s not about the volume number. We did $25 million in the first quarter. We project $80 billion to $90 billion or something like that for the full year. And that number could be 50, that number could be 150. It depends – we have the machine to do it. It just depends on how much money that we think we can make for shareholders on each unit and what kind of service we can provide to the homeowner.

Yes. Understood. Thanks guys.

Thank you.

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Michael Nierenberg for any closing remarks.

Thanks to everybody for your questions and joining the call this morning. Look forward to hopefully performing for everybody as we go out through the course of the year, stay well, and we are around for any follow-up questions. Have a great day.

The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. And you may now disconnect.