Thank you for standing by, and welcome to the ReNew Power Second Quarter 2023 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. I would now like to hand the conference over to Mr. Nathan Judge. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, and good morning, everyone, and thank you very much for joining us today. On Tuesday evening, the company issued a press release announcing results for its fiscal second quarter 2023, ended September 30, 2022. A copy of the press release and the presentation are available on the Investor Relations section of ReNew's website at www.renewpower.in. With me today are Sumant Sinha, Founder, Chairman and CEO; Kedar Upadhye, CFO; and Vaishali Sinha, Chief Sustainability Officer. Sumant will start the call by going through an overview of the company and recent key highlights. Kedar will then go through the results, followed by an update on ESG from Vaishali. And then we will wrap up the call with Sumant discussing our guidance for fiscal year 2023. After this, we will open up the call for questions. Please note, our safe harbor statements are contained within our press release, presentation materials and available on our website. These statements are important and then to grow to all our remarks. There are risks and uncertainties that could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. So we encourage you to review the press release we furnished in our Form 6-K and presentation on our website for a more complete description. Also contained in our press release, presentation materials and annual report are certain non-IFRS measures that we reconciled to the most comparable IFRS measures, and these reconciliations are also available on our website in the press release, presentation materials and annual report. It is now my pleasure to hand it over to Sumant.

Yes. Thank you, Nathan, and good morning, good afternoon or good evening, everybody, depending on where you are. Let me dive right into the presentation itself. Starting on Page 4 of the presentation. Our core operations fundamentally remain on track, and through the first half of fiscal year 2023, we are in line with our internal targets, excluding the contribution from the 528 megawatt acquisition, which is in process. For the first half of the year, revenues and EBITDA grew more than 20% year-on-year, in line with robust expansion in our commission capacities, bringing the total to 7.7 gigawatts of operating capacity. The total capacity under construction currently is 5.7 gigawatts, which is targeted to be operational by end of the next fiscal year, and that brings our total portfolio size to 13.4 gigawatts currently. Our revenues from customers rose 28% year-on-year in the first half of fiscal 2023 and cash flow to equity increased by 48% in H1 from last year due to higher revenues from operating capacities and improving DSOs. We are making good progress on our accounts receivables and are seeing regular payments coming in from the state distribution companies that have the highest amount of overdues, and Kedar will cover this in greater detail in his section. On to signing of new PPAs on Page 5. We signed 1 gigawatt of new PPAs this quarter, and we have also derisked our growth as only less than 1.5% of our 13.4 gigawatt portfolio now has pending PPAs. That's less than 1.5%. The corporate PPA portfolio itself grew 41% from Q1 and is now at 1.5 gigawatts, almost 247% higher than the prior year with many additional conversations occurring right now, which we would hope to convert to firm PPAs in the coming months. We have signed more…

Thank you, Sumant. Very good morning, good afternoon, and good evening to everybody on the call. Turning to Page 9. As we have highlighted many times over the past year, we have been focused on improving collections on the overdue receivables from the straight distribution companies, and we are pleased to announce that we have made significant progress in this regard. The quarter 2 FY '23 DSO improved over a month compared to the end of Q2 last year as the DISCOMs that have been laid on payments, almost 50% of our receivables, have now been making up payments. Normally, there is a seasonal increase in DSO in the second quarter, but this year, DSO actually improved from quarter 1. The AP, the Andhra Pradesh DISCOM, which presented about 42% of our overdue receivables as on March 31, agreed in June 2022 to pay past due over the next 12 months in equal monthly installments, and they have made about 4 payments out of 12 so far. The other states that were late have also been making payments. We continue to expect a substantial improvement in our DSO by year-end. Through November '22, Andhra Pradesh, as I mentioned, have made 4 out of 12 payments to clear its past balances and other states, including Madhya Pradesh, Telangana, Karnataka and Maharashtra are also making up past due payments. In fact, we improved our cash position by $60 million in the second quarter through better collections in the quarter that normally sees higher accounts receivable balances. It is worth emphasizing that DSO should fundamentally improve over time as an increasing percentage of our sales will be to central government and central government owned SECI, which pays its bills probably around time. Today, with 7.7 gigawatts operating, about 50% of our assets are…

Thanks, Kedar. Hello, everybody, and thank you for joining us today for the earnings call. Can we go to Slide 15? This year has been an interesting year for us from an ESG perspective as we ramped up our efforts significantly, and we disclosed our efforts in our sustainability report for fiscal year 2022. As our community members are important stakeholders, I'm delighted to share that we released the report at one of our CSR sites at [indiscernible] in the state of Rajasthan in the presence of the local community and ReNew's Global Board. The sustainability report is aligned to GRI standards and TCFD guidelines. Given our NASDAQ listing, it is also aligned with SASB. The report has been titled Partnering for Transition, Progressing Sustainably, Prospering Together as we believe that this sums up our approach towards sustainability very aptly. In line with the idea of progressing sustainably, we have restricted our carbon intensity of electricity generation to just 32.83 grams of carbon dioxide per kilowatt hours, which is 95% lower than the Indian power sector average and 94% lower than the global average. Through our clean energy operations, we have avoided 11 million tonnes of carbon dioxide and generated electricity, which is enough to power 4 million Indian households. We've deployed robotic dry cleaning, which has enabled us to save 216,000 kiloliters of water, which is enough to serve the daily consumption of 1.6 million Indians. With a view of partnering together with our employees, suppliers and communities for a carbon-free future, ReNew has taken up the following initiatives. We have derisked our supply chain from sustainability-related risks and have released the sustainability code of conduct for suppliers, which is available on our website for you to see. Our employee strength has also grown by 38% as compared to…

Thank you, Vaishali. With regard to our guidance outlined on Slide 18, the core operations of the company continue to execute as expected this year. As we mentioned earlier, weather has been a headwind year-to-date, but we provided for this in our initial FY '23 guidance. In addition, we continue to work on closing the acquisition we announced, which has had some delays. We are reiterating our guidance at this point with the obvious caveat that our full year EBITDA will depend on normal weather for the remainder of the year and timely completion of the acquisition. Our FY '23 EBITDA guidance is for between INR 66 billion and INR 69 billion, and our cash flow to equity guidance is INR 21 billion to INR 23 billion. On the buyback, we have repurchased about 20 million shares since we implemented the program, which leaves about $120 million of authorization remaining under the program. We continue to see considerable value in our shares with an 11% cash flow to equity yield on our current portfolio. R&W also trades at a meaningful discount to what we can sell assets for. As our shares are one of the highest return investments of scale we can make, we have been actively buying back stock when we believe it will provide the highest return opportunity. I would also like to highlight that we have been added to about six indices this calendar year, including the most recent or [indiscernible]. This not only helps average daily volume, but also increases the awareness of RNW to a broader audience. With that, let me thank you for your patience, and we will be happy, of course, to take any questions. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions]. And the first question will come from Julien Dumoulin-Smith with Bank of America.

This is Morgan on for Julien. Congratulations on a nice quarter here. It seems like you've had some really healthy improvement in the DSO this quarter. Can you talk about your expectations for how this is going to evolve through the remainder of the year? And how does this increased headroom kind of maybe change your latitude for further investments? Any thoughts on that.

Yes. Kedar, why don't you take that?

Yes. Yes. So as we explained, the biggest state which accounted for highest over dues was Andhra Pradesh. And on the 30th September balance sheet, we have got two installments out of the 12 installments. After 30th September, you have got another two installments on day. And till 31st March, which is your question, we will get 6 more. So in total, in this year, we'll get about 8 installments of substantial value and that will improve the DSOs to a level which will go back almost to pre-COVID days, and that will substantially contrast with the elevated levels of the DSOs we have seen for the past several quarters. So I'm a little hesitant to quote a precise number, but I'm confident the DSOs will go down to a level, which is around 175 days or so. In fact, as at October, we have already seen the DSO at 270. So naturally this releases cash and to your point, this allows us to invest more equity to fund future growth, and all of that is part of the plan. So the slide on source and use of financing, which we have included in our debt this quarter, which we referred to during the initial commentary that factors improvement in the receivables as well.

And then, I guess, can you also talk about the co-investment that was announced this quarter in the transmission projects? And how you view these opportunities as a part of your broader capital recycling plan? Any plans to kind of continue these co-investment strategies or any comments there?

Sumant, do you want to take that question?

Yes. Sure, sure. I'll take it. Yes, look, Morgan, we have won a few transmission projects till now, which, as I mentioned in my remarks, are very strategic for us because they link into the renewable energy projects that we are doing, and so therefore, help us with commissioning those projects on time and make the whole project much more predictable from a timing standpoint. Now the investment that you've got from Norfund and the other company, KLP, is basically for partnering with us and to take a 49% stake in the first of those projects with a view that eventually, they will continue to partner with us for other projects as well. So we do have a broader understanding with them for coming into more of our transmission projects. And as we win them and we get them to the point, the expectation would be for us to continue to get them to come in as coinvestors along with us right at the beginning itself. As far as recycling of assets is concerned, as we have stated in the past, that is going to be core to our strategy going forward. We do see recycling of assets as being a very important way for us to derive better value from our own capital invested in those projects and also get capital out, which we can then reinvest to further grow our portfolio. And it also allows us the opportunity of tweaking our portfolio in ways that we think eventually might be better for us from a capital hold standpoint in the longer run. So capital recycling is a fundamental part of our overall strategy. In transmission, as we've said, we've just started off that business and right off the bat, we've got very high-quality partners to come along with us. For our existing other renewable energy assets, we continue to be in conversations with a number of different investors. And as you know, for our first RTC project, we have got Mitsui as a partner with a 49% stake. And we anticipate that we will be selling more assets, potentially both to them as well as to other investors as we go forward.

The next question will come from Justin Clare with ROTH Capital Partners.

So first off here, you signed 1 gigawatt of PPAs just all in the last quarter here, so a pretty significant amount of progress there. So wondering, have you seen a meaningful change in the demand for power and an acceleration in your ability to get these PPAs signed? I was wondering just how broad-based is the demand? And then how should we think about the time it takes to go from winning at an auction to getting a PPA signed given the current environment?

Yes. Justin, look, in the -- yes. Sorry, I was just answering that. Yes, in the 1 gigawatt, there are 400 megawatts worth of corporate PPAs, which we have talked about. And 600 megawatts were PPAs that were LOAs that we had earlier, which have now got converted into PPAs. And so those are the 1 gigawatt -- that's how the 1 gigawat shows up. But fundamentally, I think your question is around the momentum that we are seeing in the market right now in terms of power demand, and therefore, the frequency of bids and therefore, accretion to our portfolio. I think that power demand, as you know, in India has been growing very robustly at about 6% per year right now. And there has been, I would say, a fairly significant shortage of power in India over the last many months and as we look forward that is likely to continue to be the case. And therefore, distribution utilities and corporates are both looking to procure new sources of energy. And renewables being the cheapest source of electricity right now becomes the obvious candidate. Now SECI is now coming up with a number of auctions. In fact, there have been a couple of auctions that we have submitted first on bids for. These are all the round-the-clock power type of projects. So the more complicated projects, and those bids will be happening very soon in the next month or so. And then behind that also we see a lot of other bids that have now been teed up by SECI, working in conjunction with the states with the DISCOMs. And so we talked about the fact that we do see imminently about 5 gigawatts of RTC auctions coming to the market. Some of those, as I said, we've…

Okay. Got it. And then, I guess, just along the lines of the demand that you're seeing, are you seeing any upward pressure on PPA prices, whether they are in the corporate market or at auctions? Is this demand being translated into those PPAs moving upwards?

So Justin what had happened is because there is more uncertainty on the commodity price side and interest rates have gone up. Obviously, those are being passed on in the form of higher tariffs. And so therefore, tariffs in general have gone up in the market, reflecting the higher input costs because obviously, we are passing those on to end customers. So I think that's really what is happening. I think the specific question of returns on these bids really is a function of the competitive intensity, which is a function of the nature of the bid and the potential off-takers. So for example, in the corporate PPA market, as we've said, a lot depends on the kind of solutioning you can provide. So we do see fewer bidders there. And in the down-the-clock power solutions that are getting bid out by SECI, we are again a few bidders there because these are harder to execute more complex, larger sized projects, which all of those play to our advantages. And so in all of these, therefore, we expect to see IRRs that should be certainly within our range of 16% to 20%. I don't want to give you whether it's higher end or lower end of that because obviously, these bids still need to happen. But I can just say that we expect to very comfortably be within our overall IRR range for a lot of these bids that are coming up. And yes, power prices have gone up because of input prices having gone up.

Right. Okay. Great. That's really helpful. And then just based on where you are in the various stages of the projects that you're developing, I was wondering if you could just speak to any notable hurdles that remain to commissioning the 13.4 gigawatts that you're planning by the end of fiscal '24. How are you feeling about how you're positioned with your access to solar panels, given the ramp-up of your manufacturing? And then how are you feeling about the wind supply chain as well?

Yes. So look, as far as supply chain is concerned, in fact, I'll just answer your question more broadly as well, looking at some of the other aspects also. So supply chain, clearly, as I said, in wind, we have pretty much procured all the turbines for these -- for the megawatts that we have to commission. And when I say procured, I mean we've locked in the supply. Of course, the turbines will get delivered at the time that we required to get them installed closer to the time we need to get them installed, but fundamentally, all the turbines have been locked in. As far as solar modules is concerned, a number of these projects are grandfathered with respect to custom duties. And so those -- for those projects were allowed to import, and so therefore, we have locked in those as well. And for the ones that we won subsequent to April of last year, for those of course, we were going to be expecting to have our own supplies of modules. And that is something that we will start getting from the first part of the module plant that we're commissioning in around the Q1, Q2 time frame of next year. So it's -- even module's supply is pretty much locked in as well. So we don't anticipate any equipment issues or any equipment supply issues causing delays in the construction of these projects. As far as financing is concerned, I'll let Kedar answer that question. But I think fundamentally, work is going on a pace right now, and at this point, there might be the usual implementation issues that we have in India around right-of-way problems and so on. Those, of course, will have to solve as and when they come up. But our expectation is that basis -- all the work that we've done so far and the work that we continue to do at sites and including land acquisition and so on, that we will be able to commission the vast majority of the 13.4 gigawatts by the end of next financial year. So we are on track for getting that done. Kedar, if you want to just talk about the financing piece as well.

Yes. Sure, Sumant, sure. Yes. So I think financing is the access and affordability of capital is quite smooth these days. We have taken a target to churn the debt portfolio more in favor of Indian rupees. And some time back, we were almost 2/3 in dollar terms, and now we are almost half. So half of the portfolio is in Indian rupees and half is in dollars. Most of the term sheets that we're getting for refinancing are in the range of 8.5 to 9 on rupee basis, and that's really helping us to build natural hedge. Domestic access to capital, as we said, have improved. There are a couple of government-backed institutions, which are coming forward to lend to companies like us that is also helping. So all in all, good on financing.

And the -- yes, go ahead. Sorry.

The next question will come from Nikhil Nigania with Bernstein.

My first question is on hedging packages. If you could give some clarity on the mix of swaps versus options in terms of the dollar debt exposure. Is it for the entire duration of the debt? And also if it's an option to what exchange rate is ahead there?

Yes. So I think we use a mix of -- yes, Nikhil, we use a mix of instruments. And in our view, when we back tested the effectiveness of hedging practices, that was proven to be quite appropriate for us. Once in a while, if the depreciation of the rupee [indiscernible] in a particular quarter, we have to take an accounting charge, which is noncash. But from a commercial logic, the mix of plain forwards and add the money forwards and cross currency swaps is proven to be useful for us. I can give you offline in terms of the kind of rates that we have been able to lock in, but almost half of the hedges are in terms of plain forwards where we lock in the current rate with a premium on a year-on-year basis. And balance is spread into ATMF options, and as I said, some of these are at 90 or between 90 to 95.

Understood. The second question was regarding the round-the-clock project, which is under construction. There, there was some update that the borrowed debt has been locked. So if you could give us some sense of what was the borrowing cost at [indiscernible] does the IRR guidance still hold for that project?

Yes, the IRR guidance still holds for that. That was a large loan, almost $1 billion, and we had a consortium among more than 10 banks. And that was the USD SOFR-linked loan approximately around 9% or so, Nikhil. And we are still quite in the range of IRRs that we target towards -- for these kind of projects.

I should add, Kedar, that obviously, with the farmdown to Mitsui, the IRR has actually become even sort of a lot better.

Understood. Just one follow-up question on that. The 9% is dollar interest rate, right?

Dollar and SOFR plus spread plus the hedging cost. So 9% is all-in fully loaded cost of...

Got it. Helpful. Yes, and then my last question is regarding storage opportunity. So many competitors have been exploring pump storage opportunities. So I just wanted to understand ReNew's views and if any plans around that?

Yes. So pump hydro is a very long gestation business. And I would say, the first pump hydro projects coming up will probably be in 2025. And that only just really one and the others might take a little bit longer. Having said that, we do believe that pump hydro has a role to play in some of the applications in the country, and so we are looking at pump hydro opportunities. But as I said, it's a long gestation business, and therefore, it will take time for those kinds of projects to come on stream. Our view continues to be also that the batteries will have a very important goal to play from a storage standpoint, and eventually, that is going to get deployed at scale as well. Of course, over the last year or so, battery prices have gone up, but our sense is that, of course, now with commodity price leasing and with government policy is hopefully turning a little bit more supportive, we should be able to see battery prices come down and make them much more competitive with respect to the shorter to medium-term storage activities. So I think both batteries and pump hydro have different roles to play. Batteries, of course, as I said, can be deployed much faster and in a much more modular manner, and therefore, give more flexibility and are less -- in some ways, less grid intensive or transmission intensive. In fact, anything we allow you to use the transmission lines more favorably. Pump hydro is a little bit different because you have to move the power across long distances potentially. And so therefore, longer term, our view still remains that batteries will prevail, but I don't think it's neither or you'll probably have both happening to some extent. And we are looking at pump hydro as well.

The next question will come from Puneet Gulati with HSBC.

My first question is with respect to the wind PLF, which has surprised again this quarter. And I remember last year was a similar event and you had said that you will reevaluate your wind projections. Can you comment on where are you in terms of reestimating the projections there?

Yes, Puneet, we had said -- you're absolutely right that we had said that we wait for this wind, the high wind season to finish and then consider doing a reevaluation depending on the outcome. And I do agree with you that wind has been not on track this year as well. Although every year for the last 3 years, the delta from the long-term mean has continued to narrow. So that at least has been happening, but it has not reverted back to what we have assumed has been the mean. What we will do over the next few months is that we will work with an external agency to relook at all the long-term assessments of our wind projects and try to arrive at, see, in fact, any change needs to be made in those forecasts or not. So that is something that we are starting that process now, and I think over the next few months, we should have some initial views coming in on that. And we'll, of course, then be happy to share that with all of you. Meanwhile, I would say that we have taken into account the performance of the wind over the last 2 years. We have become, I think, a lot more -- I would not say a lot more, but certainly, we've become a lot more mindful of looking at the near-term performance of wind over the last few years when we are making our longer-term forecast. So we are becoming a little bit more careful about the long-term forecast. So that correction to future projects that takes into account the last few years we are making. If -- finally, the last 3 years, is seen more as an aberration to the long-term mean, then so much the better we just came out conservative on big forecast going forward. And of course, if it is, in fact, a change to what we had thought was the long-term mean, then our future bids at least will be more on track. So that's really where we are.

Got it. My second question is on the acquisition, the 0.5 gigawatt acquisition. What's driving in the delays? And this is -- and now you've also segregated your EBITDA estimate between the acquisition and the organic. So is there a risk that the acquisition can get pushed into FY '24 versus '23?

Kedar?

Yes. Yes. So Puneet, we are currently in the process of integrating this acquisition. This is through slump sale route and slump sale route means that you essentially acquire all the underlying assets for land and the PPA and everything, and that's a little longer than the company acquisition. And there are -- obviously, you have to circumvent state level issues, regulatory matters and that is taking a little bit of time. At this stage, it's difficult for us to tell you exactly and precisely what we will end up with in the current year. That's why we have helped you segregate that particular item. There might be some risk, but the quantum and the magnitude will be better placed to tell you by February call. So that's the reason we are saying that the guidance is subject to completion of that acquisition. However, I should add, Puneet, that the lock -- the lockbox date of this acquisition is April, which means once the acquisition is consummated, the cash is secured. The only question is, the recognition in P&L from a revenue standpoint vis-a-vis recognition in balance sheet as a reduction in the capital expenditure. So that's the only thing I wanted to add to it that lockbox date is in April. So the economic interest is secured. The only thing is the accounting whether in P&L on balance sheet.

Got it. That's useful. My last one is on the project Sumant said that you will give up projects where you won't make below 16% to 20% IRRs. Does that mean that there are some projects -- or do you see some projects which have that kind of risk in your portfolio projects where there are low tariffs of 2.18, 2.35. Do you foresee a point where you will just forfeit those projects from your portfolio?

No, Puneet, let me clarify. What I meant to say was, not for our existing portfolio, but for any future bids that we might participate in. If we see that the tariff is coming to a level that we are not going to make the returns that we typically target, which is 16% to 20%, then we will walk away from those bids. We will not go ahead and build those bids in that case. For things that is already there in our portfolio that we've already won in the past, where we've already signed PPAs. First of all, by and large, I would say that most of our projects are within the defined range, and so we don't anticipate any issues. But even if there were issues, having signed the PPA, it would now be difficult for us to walk away, and we will probably not be looking at doing that. In the very sort of -- if there is some untoward situation, which is sort of unforeseeable, one might consider doing that. But you have to be very mindful of all the consequences of relationship with SECI and with the reputational issues and so on. So that's not something that we would do lightly once the PPA is signed. But yes, before we add the bidding process itself, of course, if projects don't meet a hurdle rate, then we will not go ahead and win those projects. And on that respect, we are only very disciplined, and we have been very disciplined over the last many years, and it actually held us in good stead. So in fact, if you probably -- while our market share is the largest in terms of bid wins over the last several years. If you also see the percentage of losses of bids not won, you'll find that we're probably also among the highest.

So projects like 975 megawatts, Rajasthan 4, where you had 2.18 tariffs, you still think you can make 16% to 20% IRRs there. Because some of the peers seems to be giving up those kind of projects with low tariffs. If you can comment on that as well.

No. So in those projects, as I said, in one-off projects, there may be a situation. I don't remember the specific project that you alluding to exactly what the numbers there are. It could very well be that in one-off projects here and there. Finally, by the time you execute the project, the IRR ends up being lower. That is possible. But by and large, as I said, we are able to deliver what we bid towards, and we only bid towards 16% to 20%. And we, therefore, in the vast majority of cases, end up delivering that much or even higher sometimes. For example, the RTC project is a case in point. Post the farm down, we are likely to make more than 20% equity IRRs on that project. So yes, so from an execution standpoint, it does tend to go this way or that way, depending on certain movements in commodity prices or interest rates or the execution issues. But as I said, the vast majority of our projects are -- all of our projects are bid and won at between 16% and 20%, and the vast majority of our projects stay within that range post execution as well.

And just quickly to add to that. Sumant mentioned earlier in his comments that we continue to have a lot of conversations with investors as it relates to capital recycling, and that broadly across the portfolio has the opportunity to improve any particular project's IRRs.

Yes, understood. Understood. And if I can squeeze in just one last one. You alluded that projects before April '21, are now grandfathered. Is that clear now from the government's perspective that there's not a change in law, but more grandfathering?

Four projects that are bid out before April 1, whether it is grandfathering or change in law -- Kedar, do you have a sense of that?

No, I could come back on the specific point, Sumant. We'll take it offline, and we'll come back to you.

The next question will come from Amit Bhinde with Morgan Stanley.

I just wanted to get your view on the offshore wind opportunity that's coming up. There was a news that bids would be tendered be put out for 4 gigawatt in Tamil Nadu. So how are you looking at that opportunity? And what is the preparedness that we have for such a project?

Yes. So look, I think offshore, it's not clear at this point that when -- and when the bid will come and in what form it will come. I think, of course MNRE is working in the direction of trying to come up with something on the offshore wind side, but they haven't yet come out with anything formal from even a discussion standpoint. So it's hard to comment on exactly what the timing will be and what the contours of a bid might be. Having said that, MNRE is also looking to allocate certain blocks of the ocean floor for blocking for the future. And so that is something that they are -- that is likely to come out more imminently. We certainly do intend to participate in those auctions for the as well. And of course, eventually, whenever an offshore win does come out, we'll, of course, be very active participants in that. There are in fact a number of potential partners that we've been talking to, who have been talking to us for partnering on those kinds of bids as and when they come. So I think we'll probably bid for those in collaboration with our partnership with somebody who has specific experience of offshore wind in some other geographies. I should tell you that when -- last time when MNRE was looking at some of these things in 2018, at that time, we have very actively done a lot of work, and we had partnered with at that time a couple of -- one European and one Japanese company to do the bid. Of course, that never progress. So we did not go ahead as well. But as and when the bid comes up, we'll of course, participate very actively.

Right. That's great to know. And sir, on the land availability, I just wanted to understand now what kind of land availability do we have beyond the 13.4 gigawatt commissioning? So do we have sufficient land availability or do we have to look for new land acquisitions, site selections, et cetera?

Yes. So we keep evaluating and making sure that we have a pipeline of development assets that go over and above the PPAs that we already have in hand. And it's not just land acquisition, it's also a question of getting transmission and connectivity. That is equally critical. So we work on both in conjunction. And in certain cases, if you can get the transmission connectivity, then you actually don't need to get the land bought in that area simply because you already block the connectivity out of that area. So the strategies could be different to lock in development pipelines for future. But at any given point in time, I can't give you an exact number because that varies, of course. But certainly, we would typically have a development pipeline in the process, which is typically 2 to 3 years beyond what our contracted portfolio is. So if today a contracted portfolio is 13.4 gigawatts, typically, we would have a development pipeline that could be at least another 2, 3 years out. And it's really on the basis of that development pipeline that we then bid for future projects beyond the contracted capacity that we already have it in hand. So that's a very active program. We have not talked about that in the past, but that is something that we work on constantly because in some ways, that is what gives us the right to keep growing our business. And therefore, there is a lot of effort and a lot of focus that we have in that area. And we also, of course, commit development capital to make sure that we continue to either block the land or the transmission connectivity as appropriate.

There are no further questions at this time. This will conclude our conference for today. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.

Thank you.