Welcome to the Range Resources Third Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. Statements made during this conference call that are not historical facts forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements. After the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question-and-answer period. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Mr. Laith Sando, Vice President Investor Relations at Range Resources. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Operator. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining Range 's third quarter earnings call. Speakers on today's call are Jeff Ventura, Chief Executive Officer; Dennis Degner, Chief Operating Officer; and Mark Scucchi, Chief Financial Officer. Hopefully, you've had a chance to review the press release and updated investor presentation that we posted on our website. We'll be referencing certain slides on the call this morning. You will also find our 10-Q on Range's website under the Investors tab or you can access it using the SEC's EDGAR system. Please note, we'll be referencing certain non-GAAP measures on today's call. Our press release provides reconciliations of these to the most comparable GAAP figures. For additional information, we've posted supplemental tables on our website to assist in the calculation of EBITDA s, cash margins, and other non-GAAP measures. With that, let me turn the call over to Jeff.

Thank you, Laith, and thanks, everyone, for joining us on this morning's call. Range continues to make steady progress in the third quarter 2021 towards our key objectives, improving margins through cost controls and competitive marketing strategies, generating free cash flow and organically reducing debt and leverage, operating safely and efficiently, and ultimately positioning the Company to return capital to shareholders in the near future as the most efficient natural gas and NGL producer in Appalachia. I'll touch briefly on these before turning it over to Dennis and Mark to cover in more detail. Starting with margins, margins improved by nearly $1 versus the prior-year quarter, driven by higher pricing and unit costs that were in line with expectations. Strong liquids pricing in an improved natural gas differential drove ranges pre -hedged, realized price for the quarter to $4.37 per MCFP, which was $0.36 above than NYMEX Henry Hub price of $4.01. This premium to Henry Hub is a major differentiator for range and as a result of our liquids optionality and diversified marketing portfolio. Through a consistent and efficient operations coupled with strong prices, Range generated healthy free cash flow in the third quarter, and this is expected to expand materially over the coming quarters at current strip pricing. In the third quarter, Range produced 277 million in cash flow. And with capital spending coming in at just 96 million, Range generated strong free cash flow that again reduced debt outstanding. Mark will provide more detail shortly. But the expansion of Range's free cash flow over the coming quarters and years is significant. At strip pricing, free cash flow in 2022 is an excess of $1 billion. And with recent improvements, the pricing in 2023 and beyond, we see a high degree of repeatability and a large free cash…

Thanks, Jeff. Third Quarter LN capital came in at $96 million with drilling and completion spending totaling approximately $92 million. Capital spending for the first three quarters of the year totaled $322 million or approximately 76% of our original annual plan. During our prior calls covering the first and the second quarter results, we touched on the operational and capital efficiencies that drive these results. And once again today, we plan to expand on these during our operations update, further showing their repeatable and durable nature. Looking forward, our activity cadence in the fourth quarter will reduce as planned with one horizontal drilling rig and one frac crew operating through year-end. We expect our projected activity coupled with secured service pricing and repeatable operational efficiencies, will place us approximately $10 million below our original all-in budget of $425 million. even as we start to observe cost pressures for areas such as steel, labor and logistics in the broader market. Production for the third quarter closed out at 2.14 BCF equivalent per day, representing a 1.5% increase over the second quarter production and a 3% increase from the beginning of the year. We anticipate a similar production increase in the fourth quarter resulting in a midpoint production guide for the year of 2.125 BCFE per day, an approximate 1% change to our previous guidance. Adjustments to our 2021 production are the results of year-to-date unplanned upsets, mainly comprised of third-party gathering and transportation outages, temporary impacts from force majeure events resulting from heat, storms, and power-related downtime, along with elevated line pressure experienced in a portion of our dry gas operating area. Despite these factors and their impacts to production, we've remained disciplined and committed to our activity and capital spending plans and we remain on track to deliver our operational…

Thanks, Dennis. During the third quarter, Range continued to be intently focused on delivering against stated objectives. Cash flow from operations of 276 million before working capital, compared to $96 million in capital spending, resulting in free cash flow of approximately $180 million. Significant improvements in free cash flow compared to past periods were driven by a 129% improvement in pre -hedge realized prices per unit of production versus the prior-year period. We've realized price per unit reaching $4.37 in the third quarter. This realized unit price is $0.36 above NYMEX Henry Hub, driven by 109% increase in NGL price per barrel, which reached $34.5 before hedges. Realized NGL price on an MCFP basis equates to $5.68. If Henry Hub natural gas prices rose, Range's diversified portfolio of transportation capacity and customer contracts also maintained basis differentials, such that the total per unit price received by Range is a premium to Henry Hub. Hedging results for the industry have understandably been a focus item for investors to assess near-term opportunity costs, while also looking to future strategy and retained participation in improved prices. Near-term, our strategy of reducing risk through an active hedge program remains. For 2022, we seek to generate very competitive returns on capital employed, generate free cash flow directed to absolute debt reduction, and to be balanced in our risk management so as to not hedge away improved fundamentals. NGLs are hedged typically on a rolling 3 to 6-month basis, meaning exposure to higher NGL prices is retained with improving average hedge price by quarter. For perspective, Range's production mix is approximately 30% liquids, both NGL s and condensate. Range's quarterly revenue from Liquids over the last year has averaged between 40% to 48%. As a result, the carefully considered cadence and structuring of natural gas hedges…

Operator, we'll be happy to answer questions.

Thank you, Mr. Ventura. The question-and-answer session will now begin. [ Operator Instructions ] The first question is from Josh Silverstein with Wolfe Research.

Hey, good morning guys. You talked a little bit before about the ability to shift some capital around. Can you talk about what you're thinking for this environment right now? Obviously, we're in a high gas price environment, but also NGL price environment. How much flexibility do you have within the program right now? Obviously, we're going to see what would -- what winter may do, but how much flexibility do you guys have to shift capital around?

Yes. Good morning, Josh. This is Dennis. We maintain a -- what I'd say is a reasonable level of flexibility in the program. And part of that's because of the consistent track record we've had with moving back in the pad sites with existing production. That certainly allows us the ability to move into whether it's the liquids side of our portfolio, or move over to the dry gas assets and have further development. So we think, as a planning exercise, we always leave a fair bit of optionality in the program, so that allows us to react appropriately. But also say this, we certainly make it a goal to put together what we think is our best plan for an upcoming program year. When you look through the slide deck, the economics are incredibly competitive across all three areas of the field that we have designated. So it allows us not only to have that flexibility, but also to capitalize on let's just say movements in the liquids market, which you've -- you certainly heard Alan touch on in the past. So we leave a fair bit of flexibility, we like how it shapes up for our program. And again, moving back into those parts with existing production really allows us that flexibility.

Great. And then, how much incremental capacity does Range have to continue supporting liquid's growth, given the infrastructure and then the firm transport in the export capacity that you guys have? How much further can that really get to? And then locally next year, there's Shell 's ethane cracker coming in. I just wanted to see if you have any direct sales into that.

Sure, Josh. I'll start, then I'll take over to Alan. But as we think high level, we really see that there's an option for additional, not only gathering, but also processing capacity will just stay right there in our backyard associated with our producing assets. A part of that we feel is going to come with other co - exhaustion and quality of the inventory starting to expire for maybe some of the regional producers. We feel like we're poised with two-thirds of our inventory being in that liquids-rich portion of our assets, really sets us up nicely to be able to take advantage of producing into that space. From a, let's just say, NGL export optionality standpoint, I'll turn it over to Alan. But before I do, we have always left the optionality for us to both put barrels on not only pipe but also on rail depending upon where we can get our molecules to most premium markets. So in some cases that very well could be getting it to a shell cracker type facility, in some cases it's clearly getting it on a water-borne export. Whereas, if you look at this year, about 80% of our propane and butane is actually getting over to a ship and heading to a foreign price point. So with that, I'm going to turn it over to Alan.

Hey, Josh, this is Alan. So on the ethane in particular, as Dennis was saying, we do have a lot of flexibility. We're fortunate in standpoint that we've got a really unique position with production out of Houston, out of Majorsville, and out of Harmon Creek. And we can get into all 4 ethane takeaway pipelines. So given all that, in the flexibility we have within our program, we're in a pretty unique position where we can take advantage of ethane opportunities, and we optimize around that flexibility on some of the daily basis. And I think that shows up in our relative premium to the market index on ethane.

And I would just add in, given our long core inventory, and there's a slide in there on slide 15, we can do that for a long, long time as others exhaust theirs.

Great. Thanks, guys.

Thanks, Josh.

Our next question is from Doug Leggate of Bank of America.

Hey, guys. Good morning. I hope you can all hear me Okay. Jeff, I want to hear on the maintenance program. And the thing that really jumps out to us when we think about your investment case relative to your peers, it's the depth of the inventory. So when you talk about multiple decades of an inventory, you're obviously talking about sustaining level. Is that how we should think about your base business model was, the primary objective holding flat, not just for one year, but for multiple years. So that's kind of my first question. My second question is what are the implications therefore, on the underlying decline rate on the sustaining capital that goes along with that? Because presumably, both of those decline over time if you stick to that maintenance level. I'll leave it there. Thanks.

We'd just say yeah, we think that is a differentiator, again, on slide 15, having the longest core inventory. And also important is we have the lowest base decline rate of anybody in the Basin, so -- which leads to best maintenance capital. But yeah, clearly we're going to be at maintenance for next year. And when we have been, we have a little bit of flexibility to be at maintenance long-term or to the extent the market indications, whatever be there, the backend of the curve comes up as much. So backwardated that we would have the option to increase at low single-digit growth if we wanted to. So we can keep at maintenance and generate significant free cash flow for a long, long time. And again, we have a great operations team that has class-leading cost to drilling complete. So, I think we're in good shape under either program, but clearly going to be looking at maintenance for next year, for sure.

To be clear, the compass guide grows up a little bit this year and you addressed on your prepared remarks regarding the activity in the fourth quarter. But I'm really focused on the fourth 25 you talked about all-in capital. I think your declined rate is high teams currently. If you stick to that program, where do those two numbers trend I guess is my question. I do actually have a follow-up if I may.

Yeah, the decline rate with time in a maintenance program should shallow, so the 19% would become even lower. In terms of capital, Dennis, you might hit a little bit on the capital program and looking forward into next year?

You bet. Doug, I'll -- I know you've probably seen it, but I'll reference slide number 8 in our slide deck. It's a good example of shifting from, we'll call it the spreadsheet exercise of capital required under current cost-type scenarios too, then shifting over to what does it look like when you start to move into real life development. So that gets you from the 350 million to closer to the 425, which is what we've been communicating throughout the year. We expect to see some inflationary effects. We're seeing them now. We're seeing them in areas like labor, steel, and some other materials. The positive is that the team just continues to find creative ways to look for additional efficiency gains. We tried to touch on some of those in the prepared remarks today, both from water savings to the drilling team really hitting a home run in adding additional footage drilled in the lateral by 16% versus just the prior quarter. So those all turn into real dollars for us that we can turn back at the end of the year. When you look at them on a quarter-by-quarter basis, they may be smaller, but by the time you do get to the end of the year, it's allowing us to communicate that capital reduction for this year. As we look forward, I think a reasonable bandwidth is 425 to something that's higher depending upon what we harvest through this inflationary effect. We're in the throes of our bid process right now that we go through every fall. So difficult to communicate what we're anticipating to see for a maintenance capital guide today. We'll provide more color and clarity on that in our next call in February. But know that wherever we land through that, when you look over the past 4 years, we're now on our fourth year in a row coming in under our capital guidance, delivering on our plans and leading our peer group from a capital efficiency standpoint, and we don't tend to give up that position.

Doug, this is Mark.

[Indiscernible] Go on, Mark.

As we think about what the valuation implications are of your question, what we're talking about when we or any investor is looking at Range in a simple maintenance mode is you're evaluating a Company and doing evaluation in a bond-like or an annuity-like fashion, such that you're building what is, I might argue, a floor to the evaluation. So by doing that, we may not get all the value baked into the type of model for the contractual declines in GP&T costs. There are certainly inflation considerations in this market, as Dennis pointed out, but there's also optionality you get in the rising commodity prices and a free option on the industry's finite inventories that may, at some point, lead to market share growth for Range or at some point when the market dictates that growth. So using the maintenance capital case and maintenance mode, there is some efficiency and the declining base decline. But in essence, when I step back and look at how that frames and does it capture the entire valuation of Range's multi-decade inventory, I think it provides a good reference at a floor level, at which point you're still getting optionality on price and duration of Range's inventory that's not comparable to peers.

As you know, Mark, that's exactly how we think about your evaluation. I've taken up enough time. So thanks so much, guys.

Thanks, Doug.

Our next question is from Michael [indiscernible] with Stifel. Michael O’keeffe: Good morning, guys. Maybe just get -- I want to get some further thoughts on hedging. Mark, you talked about protecting some of the cash flow without hedge the upside. You did add some 22 hedges, looks like you've got about 60%-year, gas production hedged for next year. Now, are you comfortable with that level or as gas prices continue to rise here or plan to add more, and maybe thoughts on hedging further out into '23?

Yeah, it's a fair question. I think stepping back just to talk a little bit further about what the objective is, I think our objective for the end goal is highlighted on the slide deck on slide 14. When we look at that slide and the iterations over the course of this year, early this year, we were talking about strip pricing and hopes of being substantially below three times leverage at the end of 2021. A quarter or two ago, we said we thought we'd be at mid times 2; well, now strip pricing, along with our incremental hedges, we're talking low 2 times. And fast forward into 2023 strip pricing, including our hedges, Europe potentially sub 1 times levered. So our objective has always been, again, to generate that value -- take that enterprise value and shift it over to the equity holder and just reduce risk. By reducing the absolute debt level, you create additional flexibility in the hedging programs such that the historical trend of hedging between 70% to 80% may or may not represent the best plan going forward. You would certainly have the choice of reducing some of that hedge profile to participate directly in commodity prices. Again, we studied the markets, we studied the supply-demand fundamentals, and what indicates for realized prices. But our objective here, reduce absolutely debt, that as I mentioned in the opening remarks, also positions Range at a point at which we achieve our target leverage levels to announce a framework for returns of capital. So getting back to your very specific question on what is our target percentage hedge for 2022, 2023, I don't think we're going to give a specific number. I think with these strip prices generating and getting us to our target levels, it would make sense to continue to move slowly to continue to use structures, like collars that continue to retain upside exposure. I'd point out that the additional positions that were added, particularly for 2022, were well above $4. So it's our goal to hang on to that upside, not hedge it away. As for '23, again, your reduced absolute debt, you have greater optionality. We'll continue to study fundamentals. But It's about returning value to shareholders.

And I would just add in, about 45% of our revenue comes from NGLs. Sure you remember that. And the NGLs are very likely to hedge and we're very constructive what NGL pricing is and will be. Michael O’keeffe: Pretty good. Dennis, you talked about some of the delays and weather issues that impacted production in your fourth-quarter guidance. Just want to see if you can provide any additional detail there. And do we expect any of those issues to any kind of lingering impacts on next year?

Yeah, we really don't, Michael. And I think the way we would phrase this is very seasonal short-term in nature. And some of that same, if you look back over the balance of the summer, we saw some of our warmer - than -normal average temperatures in Appalachia. And that no doubt resulted into some effects from time-to-time on runtime for equipment, which we saw translated itself through our production. We also had some storms come through the area, and those also created some impact. So we expect this to be more short-lived and be back to business as usual here in the quarters ahead. Michael O’keeffe: Thank you, guys.

Thank you, Michael.

Our next question is from David Deckelbaum of Cowen.

Thanks for taking my questions today guys.

Sure. Thank you.

I just have 2 just 1 given the increases and pricing and your view that you're going to be potentially sub one-times levered at strip pricing next year. And the emphasis on having this long inventory life has that changed how you think about potential core and non-core asset dispositions with, should we generally think that there isn't necessarily an endeavor that bring forth net value by selling other packages at this point?

This is Mark. I'll start with that. At this stage, we are very happy with the inventory and the infrastructure and the business and the contracts that are overlaid on top of that. There is optionality across the play, there's good infrastructure, and we are left with a high-quality inventory. So that is a very good thing. I think that's a distinguishing hallmark that allows a bit more predictability and more confident modeling and evaluation of the Company. So at this point, the motivations behind selling inventory; do you need capital? Can you harvest some additional value incrementally and pull that forward model? I don't think that's a significant driver of value for Range. So at the time being, I'd say any divestiture initiative would not be a priority.

I appreciate that. And then my follow-up would just be just around pricing. And I think Jeff, you alluded to some optionality in the future to maybe grow single digits when the market warrants. As we think about going into next year, you're obviously focused on maintenance mode free cash generation. In the event that we get into winter and then targeting first-quarter of next year, there is hyper-volatility in pricing or price spikes, is it fair to assume that there really isn't much that Range would do to respond to near-term price actions such as field level, choke management solutions, things like that?

Yes. Thank you. We've been pretty clear in the report next year, we're going to add maintenance -- and it's important. We've talked about it a few times. We think core exhaustion, or inventory -- core inventory isn't evenly distributed. It's one like Mark said, one of the distinguishing features of Range, that we can do that for a long time, and very -- very long time, very predictable, that creates a lot of value, to the extent you see core exhaustion from other people, and we can fill that long, long term. We'd get a chance to maybe capture a little bit of market share. But again, we're -- that's a longer-term thing. We're focused on -- yes, we're excited about next year's plan, generating well in excess of a billion dollars of free cash flow, driving leverage down to below 1 times.

Certainly.

This is getting us in -- and one thing I'll just retouch on is we look at it also as when will we see production arrive when we do this -- have the discussion around growth? And clearly, as you start to plan and consider your options, it is about a 9 to 12-month on average cycle time -type decision. By the time you get permits, your well's identified, you've got room in the gathering system, and then you turn that into executable we'll just say molecules that will turn the sales meter. The first 15% of that EUR is going to get captured in the first 12 months. But after that, when you look at the backwardation in the curve, it's something we have to really take into consideration, and if that's the exposure that we want to put forward in the program at this time. So it's multi-pronged as we evaluate this for sure.

Thanks for the clarity there. Thank you, guys.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Neil Mehta of Goldman Sachs.

Thanks, guys, and good morning. I want you to take some time to walk through how you're thinking about the NGL price outlook on a more structural medium-term basis. Do the bullish drivers that have led us to this price point here sustain themselves? And walk us through the individual products, particularly propane and ethane, and how you're seeing the balances.

Yeah. Good morning, Noel. I'll start here and then I'll hand over to Alan. But I think as we look forward, there is a lot of reasons to be optimistic about NGL pricing. And Alan will dive into a few of the deeper -- clearly the deeper details. But part of it is when you look at where supply and demand have really been over the balance of the last few years with operators administering capital discipline over the balance of the last year, year-and-a-half, clearly, that's taken some supply and supply growth out of the conversation, especially as you start to think about the contribution of associated gas NGL type contributions as well. All throughout that exports have really remained strong, and with odd remaining open so. With our optionality that we touched on a little bit earlier for us to either keep molecules on the NGL side, either domestically through pipe and rail or get them on a waterborne export. It's continued to create a balance that we've been able to take advantage of. And then, I think, lastly, when you look at the incremental demand that continues to get commissioned, whether it's infrastructure or really just also has done -- Jeff touched on his prepared remarks, remarks. It's really getting these energy source to other countries that really need it. And so I'm going to hand that over to Alan because -- but we remain really optimistic looking forward about ongoing NGL prices.

Thanks, Dennis. And Neil, this is Alan. I'll touch on ethane and propane and just give you a little bit of flavor what demand looks like and what potential upside still is. On ethane, right now ethane going into making ethylene is one of the most competitive feedstock that you can use. So from that standpoint, there is a fair amount of margin, actually, a lot of margin that's still available for ethane going into ethylene. We've got, just through the end of this year in the U.S., two new facilities that are coming on that are going to add roughly 175,000 barrels per day of new demand. So that's Bayport Polyolefins and then the joint venture between ExxonMobil and SABIC that's coming on. We get into next year; you've got roughly 75,000 barrels per day of new export demand. That's expected to come on as the Orbit terminal ramps up in supplying satellite petrochemicals, second cracker in China. And then between Shell Nova and DowDuPont, you've got maybe another 175,000 barrels per day of new ethane demand. The margin right now between -- for an integrated producer of polyethylene in the U.S.is about $1.70 per gallon. So again, that just gives you an idea of how much more upside there is for ethane. Flipping over to propane, propane is already out of the steam cracker -- ethylene steam cracker feedstock portfolio. It's been a portfolio globally since about July. So that demand has disappeared. But there's still a lot of demand from the PDH standpoint, from ethylene crackers that have to crack propane and butane, as well as from the risk-on standpoint. And if we look just simply at residential and commercial, let's say in the U.S., propane can compete a little bit with heating oil. Heating oil is at 234 per gallon, I think closes business one day. So with propane at about 40, that leaves over $0.80, $0.90 of upside there. If we look at LNG, let's say whether it's in Europe or in Asia, let's use Asia for an example, LNG is $32 per MMBTU. FEI or Asian propane is at around 850 per ton. That translates to 18.50 per MMBTU. So that leaves upside of 13.50 per MMBTU. Sorry for all the numbers, but if you convert that, that gets you to about 23 per gallon of upside on the propane price. So given the combination of new demand that's coming on plus margin that's still available in relative to competing materials, were still really bullish that there is a lot upside in these products.

Neil, this is Mark. Just to add on one, maybe summary comment if I could. With that level of detail, sometimes it's challenging to market -- to grasp and to model the NGL component of a producer's revenue streams. So for reference in the appendix, there's a buildup of Mont Belvieu pricing by stream because of the barrel weighting and so forth. At current strip pricing for the fourth quarter, you get to a Mont Belvieu estimated price of $41.50 per barrel. That equates to roughly $6.50 per MCFE. So again, perspective on Range's uplift, positive pricing above Henry Hub, and the outstanding margin expansion Range is experiencing driving free cash flow.

That's great although they are really big numbers in those terrific perspective, if I can drill down into micro here, next year, it looks like you guys are going to be in a position to talk about capital returns. Obviously, the big part of the story at this year has been about deleveraging next year, you'll have an opportunity to evaluate whether its dividends or buybacks most likely. You've seen some of your peers implement a variable dividend model. Do you have any initial reactions to that? Do you think that makes sense in your business model as well? And, have you gotten any investor feedback on that this far?

Yeah. We certainly listen and discuss all of these types of matters in the business with our investors trying to understand what is most valued and desirable for them. There are obviously different impacts on different portfolios depending on their personal tax jurisdictions and so forth. Taking a step back for Range, as you point out with our leverage heading into target zones, it would be a logical next step for us to announce perhaps next year what that framework might look like. I think the programs that the industry has spoken of, in general terms, makes sense. This is a commodity in capital-intensive business; there is cyclicality to it. So a modest base dividend makes sense, a variable component makes sense. I think the variable component, from a mathematical perspective ought to have flexibility. Again, commodity prices move around, the capital investment can move around. Some framework around it should give comfort to investors. But that said, it's also a mathematical exercise of whether it should be share repurchases or incremental dividend and what is most valued by investors. But I would also add that we view it as we have been returning capital to investors for quite some time. With absolute debt reduction of 1.3 billion as of today, basically, since the peak in late 2018, with the repurchase of 10 million shares, this has been a commitment of the strategy of the business for some time. So, there may be further iterations as we announce a framework in coming quarters, whatever the time maybe. But suffice it to say, that has been our focus today.

Thanks, Tim.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

We are nearing the end of today's conference. We will go to Arun Jayaram Morgan Chase for our final question.

Good morning. This first question is for Dennis. I was just trying to think about your 2021 -- or 2022 [Indiscernible]. Dennis, any sense of how much footage that Range is executing this year with the 60 wellbores versus I think you did 67 last year. So I'm trying to get a sense of footage this year versus last year and what this could mean for 2022, assuming a maintenance - type program.

Good morning, Arun. I think it's fair to -- from an assumption standpoint, our average lateral length that we target from a planning perspective is around 10,000 feet. So as you think about translating that back from a well -count perspective, there's always going to be a little variability there. You've no doubt seen our numbers continue to increase on lateral footage basis. But it should be really similar when you think about how much will both drill complete and turn in line for 2022 on a maintenance-type level program. This is one of the reasons why we've talked about similar capital levels, given the current cost assumptions might've seen inflationary effect. So similar capital efficiency, and really should be a similar program all the way.

Fair enough. And then just my follow-up, you touched on some of the inflationary pressures the industry as a whole is seeing. Dennis, have you yet begun the tendering process? I know that Range is focused on some of the more ESG -friendly frac and drilling equipment, so I'm just wondering if you could give us a sense of how those leading-edge conversations are for your frac and drilling needs for 2022.

Well, it's certainly -- yes, we are in the throes of that process and difficult to share the results today because we're still in the process of harvesting those and evaluating the numbers. So too early to share what those details will look like at this time. But what we are seeing is that service providers that historically wanted to align with Range that we have good partnerships with, they want to continue to do so because of our efficiency models, which we know that helps keep, let's just say, their side of the ledger in the right direction. It also keeps our cost low because we capture those costs through efficiency gains and other measures. So we're optimistic about what we're going to capture, but we are seeing some inflationary effects come our way.

Great, thanks a lot.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. This concludes today's [Indiscernible] answer session. I'd like to turn the call back over to Mr. Ventura for closing remarks.

We just appreciate everybody taking time to listen to our call and ask questions this morning. Please feel free to follow-up with our team afterwards. Thank you.

Thank you for your participation in today's conference. You may disconnect at this time.