Good afternoon, and welcome to the Republic Services Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2024 Investor Conference Call. Republic Services is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol RSG. All participants in today's call will be in a listen-only mode. Please note that this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Aaron Evans, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

I would like to welcome everyone to Republic Services' fourth quarter and full year 2024 conference call. Jon Vander Ark, our CEO, and Brian DelGhiaccio, our CFO, are on the call today to discuss our performance. I would like to take a moment to remind everyone that some information we discuss on today's call contains forward-looking statements, including forward-looking financial information, which involve risks and uncertainties and may be materially different from actual results. Our SEC filings discuss factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. The material that we discussed today is time-sensitive. If in the future, you listen to a rebroadcast or recording of this conference call, you should be sensitive to the date of the original call, which is February 13, 2025. Please note that this call is the property of Republic Services, Inc. Any redistribution, retransmission, or rebroadcast of this call in any form without the expressed written consent of Republic Services is strictly prohibited. Our SEC filings, our earnings press release, which includes GAAP reconciliation tables and a discussion of business activities, along with the recording of this call, are available on Republic's website at republicservices.com. In addition, Republic's management team routinely participates in investor conferences. When events are scheduled, the dates, times, and presentations are posted on our investor website. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Jon.

Thanks, Aaron. Afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. The Republic team finished the year strong. We delivered world-class service and innovative solutions for our customers and executed our strategy to profitably grow the business. As a result of the team's efforts, we delivered adjusted EBITDA, EPS, and free cash flow that exceeded our full-year guidance. During 2024, we achieved revenue growth of 7%, generated adjusted EBITDA growth of 12%, expanded adjusted EBITDA margin by 140 basis points, delivered adjusted earnings per share of $6.46, and produced $2.18 billion of adjusted free cash flow. We continue to be well-positioned to capture new opportunities and create long-term value for our stakeholders through our differentiated capabilities, customer zeal, digital, and sustainability. Regarding customer zeal, our focus on delivering world-class essential services continues to support organic growth and enhanced customer loyalty. Our customer retention rate remains strong at more than 94%. We continue to see favorable trends in our net promoter score due to the value of the offerings and quality of our service delivery. Fourth-quarter organic revenue growth was driven by solid pricing across the business. Average yield on total revenue was 4.4% and average yield on related revenue was 5.3%. This level of pricing continued to exceed our cost inflation and helped drive 110 basis points of EBITDA margin expansion during the quarter. Organic volume on total revenue declined 1.2% in the quarter. Volume losses were concentrated to shedding underperforming contracts in the residential business and continued softness in construction and certain manufacturing end markets. Turning to our expanding digital capabilities, we continue to advance the implementation of digital tools to improve the experience for both customers and employees. Deployment of EMPower, our new fleet and equipment management system, is underway. EMPower is designed to increase maintenance technician productivity and…

Thanks, Jon. Core price on total revenue was 6.1% in the fourth quarter, core price on related revenue was 7.3%, which included open market pricing of 9.1% and restricted pricing of 4.5%. The components of core price on related revenue included small container of 9.6%, large container of 7.4%, and residential of 6.8%. Average yield on total revenue was 4.4% and average yield on related revenue was 5.3%. As expected, average yields stepped down sequentially as we fully anniversary the impact of new fees implemented in late 2023. The fees relate to overfilled containers and recycling contamination and were enabled by our digital platform. In 2025, we expect average yield on total revenue of approximately 4% and average yield on related revenue of approximately 5%. Fourth-quarter volume on total revenue decreased 1.2% and volume on related revenue decreased 1.5%. Volume results included a decrease in large container of 4.6%, primarily due to continued softness in construction-related activity and certain manufacturing end markets, and a 2.8% decrease in residential due to intentionally shedding underperforming contracts. In 2025, we expect organic volume growth in the recycling and waste business in a range of negative 25 basis points to positive 25 basis points. Moving on to recycling, commodity prices were $153 per ton during the fourth quarter. This compared to $131 per ton in the prior year. Recycling processing and commodity sales increased revenue by 20 basis points during the quarter. Full-year 2024 commodity prices were $164 per ton. This compared to $117 per ton in the prior year. Current commodity prices are approximately $145 per ton, which is the baseline used in our 2025 guide. Fourth-quarter total company adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 110 basis points to 31%. Margin performance during the quarter included margin expansion in the underlying business of 110 basis…

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. In the interest of time, we ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up question today. If your question has been answered and you would like to withdraw your request, please press *2. Your first question today will come from Bryan Bergmeier with Citi. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the questions. So ES was obviously really strong last year, and I think you've said ERP implementation was kind of ongoing throughout the year. So with that now completed, is it fair to say there's almost another sort of leg up for this business since it's fully integrated? Or you maybe just help me frame what comes next for ES? Having hit, you know, 24% margins and seemingly cleared a bit of a hurdle.

Yeah. Onward and upward with the business. We continue to remain very positive on our prospects there. Great year last year and you're right, lots of heavy lifting by the team in terms of IT integration. We certainly have most of that behind us. There's certainly some work we're gonna work on the rest of the year. But we will mostly pause M&A in that area last year just to give the team time to breathe and integrate. And so, you know, we see opportunities certainly for M&A growth coming in that space in 2025, as well as more organic growth. Right? This a lot of the IT work enables us to do more cross-sell, better visibility, more clarity on product line profitability. And so we will see that ramping up throughout the year in 2025 and certainly beyond as well.

Got it. Got it. Thanks for that detail. And then was just wondering, Jon, if you could touch on the margin bridge year over year for 2025. I think we're looking like 20, 30 basis points increase year on year, and think you saw in the last call, you know, long term, you're trying to get to maybe 30 to 50 as opposed to 20 to 30. So just a little bit of detail on your margin expansion would be great, and I'll turn it over. Good luck on the quarter.

Yeah. Thanks. Yeah. We kinda say across if you look across the cycle, kind of 30 to 50 basis points a year. In any given year, it could be a little more outsized or a little more muted on that front. Obviously, coming off an incredibly strong year in 2024 of 140 basis points of margin expansion. And then as you get into 2025, listen, you know, the end market, construction particularly and then parts of manufacturing, are still, you know, pretty soft. So we're looking for those to come back. Manufacturing is showing some really good early signs on that front. Construction where interest rates are in terms of impact on mortgage rates in the ten year I think that's gonna be delayed here from a progress standpoint. So that certainly feeds into that. I know it Dell had in. Yeah. Brian, you know, to your point, when you take a look at the midpoint, you're looking at approximately 30 basis points of margin expansion. But if you unpack that, you take a look, we took the current price of commodities and we held that flat for the entire year. So that's approximately $145 per ton. If you compare that to the $165 average we had in 2024, about a 10 basis point headwind year over year. As well as then some deal and integration costs we have on the acquisition front. We look at that as about a 10 basis point headwind as well. So the underlying business is growing approximately 50 basis points plus. That 50 basis points is also overcoming what I would consider kind of some unique items. For example, we are not assuming that CNG tax credits are renewed. That cost us about $20 million or 10 basis points on a year over year basis. So if you really look at the strength of the underlying business, you're in a 60, 70 basis point of margin expansion as compared to the headline which would suggest something closer to 30.

Your next question today will come from Tyler Brown of Raymond James. Please go ahead.

Hey. Good afternoon, guys.

Hey, Todd.

Hey, Ron. Great detail on the bridge. But hey, Jon. I'm interested in the billion dollars in acquisition commentary. I know that's not included in the guidance. It's probably just a placeholder, but you must feel pretty good. So what do you kinda see out there on the M&A front? Are you looking at traditional solid waste, or could there be some more specialty hazardous waste type stuff in the pipe as well?

Yeah. I think for the last few years, we've put a marker out there more, like, $500 million. And we're typically, let's get an indicator. We're always gonna look at deals that pass due screens, our strategic filter and our financial filter. The outsized number this year is predicated off a really strong start already. So we feel really good about the momentum the team has and things that are either closed or nearly closed on that front. So we've got a big head start and that gives you a better indication of where we're gonna end up. In terms of where it's come from, plus we got a really good pipeline on ES and recycling and waste. I would expect that pipeline looks a little heavier slanted in the first half toward the ES. And then over the back half, probably heavier more heavily slanted toward recycling and waste. But we'll see all of those things play out.

Okay. So, Ron, is there a material M&A benefit in 2025 based on what has been closed today in Q1? I'm more confused on that.

Well, if you just take, I'll put it in terms of revenue. If you take a look at rollover, which was pretty insignificant from deals in 2024, but including what's closed to date, we've got about a full point of revenue growth from those deals.

Okay. Okay. That's helpful. And then back on the flattish volume, is there any benefit from wildfires or hurricane cleanup in there? Is that just not material, or would that be upside, or how should we think about that?

We didn't bake it in. Right? I think there will be over time. I think it TBD, how that plays out. I mean, we're certainly on the ground right now with our ES teams, supporting those communities and getting the household hazardous waste cleaned up. And that will ultimately matriculate into some forms of hazardous waste and certainly plenty of special waste that ends up in the landfills exactly where and how that ends up? We don't know yet, so that's not built in.

Okay. Okay. That's very helpful. Thanks, guys.

Your next question today will come from Noah Kaye with Oppenheimer. Please go ahead.

Great quarter, guys. Thanks for taking the questions. The 5% yield and related revenue in the guide, can you comp that to cost inflation expectations on related? Are you looking, like, for the 3.5 and maybe 150 of spread? Right way to think about it?

Yeah. I think we're probably closer to 4 on the cost side. If you layer employee wage increases, benefits, etcetera, inflation on maintenance. So that takes us right about 4 and then 5 on related.

Okay. Great. And then I just had to think about seasonality for the year. You know, I think there are certainly on things like commodities, more favorable comps within the year. It's not that big of a headwind for you. But you also have, as you mentioned, some M&A benefits. So just give us some rough guidelines on how you think about at least sort of EBITDA cadence for the year.

Yeah. I would say just think about from the perspective of margin expansion. We would see it more balanced, you know, this year than maybe what you've seen over the last couple years. Maybe a little bit more heavily slanted towards the first half of the year than the second. But, you know, you can think of it relatively consistent for, you know, by quarter. First half, second half with margin expansion in all quarters. And across all business types.

That's super clear. I'll turn it over. Thank you.

And your next question today will come from Jerry Revich with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Yes. Hi. Good afternoon, everyone. I'm wondering if you just talk about how the polymer centers are performing, Jon. Are you folks hitting the efficiency rates that you had targeted and, you know, what's the level of contribution, Brian, that you folks are embedding in the guide from the polymer centers plus the RNG plants? Can you calibrate us on that?

Yeah. I'd say, you know, listen, some learning and start-up costs in terms of uptime on equipment and getting that dialed in. Certainly, some learnings on getting the specification right with each of the individual customers. There's some uniqueness there and some learning associated with that. The good news is, right, all of our assumptions on run rate in terms of price, cost, volume, willingness to pay, right, really strong and really positive on those assumptions. So feeling good about the place that Las Vegas is right now, we're taking all those learnings, obviously, and feeding those into Indianapolis. And so, you know, on our marks and I don't wanna report, and I'll let Brian cover the specifics.

Yeah. So for next year, you know, across our portfolio, sustainability investments, we're looking at incremental revenue around $70 million and incremental EBITDA of $35 million.

That is clear. Thank you. And then, Brian, I just wanna go back to your comment on the weighting of margins, the downside of having a really good performance in 2024 and really good fourth quarter is maybe a bit of a tough comp. So, you know, if we were to apply normal seasonality to the fourth quarter margin run rate, think it would imply first-quarter margins that are up 150 to 200 basis points year over year, and it sounds like you're guiding to just more modest margin improvement on a year-over-year basis in the first quarter? Is there anything lumpy in the fourth quarter? Can you just expand on that? Because it felt like you've built momentum across the businesses over the course of 2024.

Yeah. But, you know, Jerry, if you step back and you think about a normal level of seasonality, and you think about the distribution where you generate the amount of earnings and relative margin expansion, Q1 is seasonally your lowest quarter. You've got the winter months. You also have the highest percentage of employee-related taxes. So that tends to be your low watermark. And generally followed by Q4. And then Q2 and Q3 are relatively similar, but I would put Q2 as third and Q3 as far as meaning it's or Q3 is the highest level of margin expansion for the year. So, sequentially, going from 31% in the fourth quarter, to something that steps down modestly, is not gonna generate 100 basis points of margin expansion on a year-over-year basis. If you recall, margin was 30.2% in the first quarter of 2024.

Appreciate it. Thank you.

Your next question today will come from Trevor Romeo with William Blair. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good afternoon. Thanks so much for taking the question. I wanted to ask to follow-up on the environmental solutions business. Really nice quarter of growth there. Just in terms of the revenue performance, just wondering if you could, I guess, talk about the pricing environment for hazardous waste for one. And then just kind of maybe split out what you're seeing between the treatment and disposal versus the field services business and how you're thinking about each of those pieces moving into 2025?

Yeah. Obviously, lots of positive impact on margin performance over the last two and a half years since we did the US Ecology acquisition. And that's come through a number of different levers. That's come certainly through customer mix. Of getting attractive customers who are willing to pay more and shedding, you know, work that's less profitable. That's come from, you know, pricing the work that we do. It's come from cost management and being more efficient and utilizing resources. And so if you think about our movement going forward, we're not gonna expand margins at the same rate as we have over time, but we're kicking continue to expand margins. In that space because and we think there's value of the work that we're delivering. And as we continue to build that out, we'd be have a more differentiated set of products and services. So you'll see pricing on both of the post-collection on assets as well as the field service and, you know, that's good. Will look more like single price increases a year more ratable like we do in recycling and waste. Versus multiple price increases within the year. But we expect continued momentum and contribution in 2025.

Okay. Great. Thanks for that, Jon. And then wanted to follow-up on the labor environment a little bit. I think you mentioned turnover was 150 basis points lower in 2024. Was just wondering, you know, one, where does that place you relative to kind of your historical averages? And then two, any sort of new initiatives you're putting in place in 2025 and, I guess, how much runway you think you have to decrease turnover further? Would be great.

Yeah. I don't we don't have, you know, 30-year numbers on turnover, but this is a decade low. Right? We are really performing at a high level from a turnover standpoint. And it starts with leadership, employee engagements, very, very strong. And a lot of good things happen when you get turnover into that spot, which is you're servicing customers at a very effective rate. Those customers are happy with the service, and they pay more, and they stay longer. When you do that, we certainly looked for room to improve turnover. Unlike say where your goal is zero. The goal in turnover is not zero. Some level of turnover is always natural and healthy. And so I don't think we're gonna get the same leap and improvement in 2025, but we're gonna continue to grind out a few more basis points of improvement. We think the team is capable of that.

Great. Thanks so much.

Your next question today will come from Sabahat Khan with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks, and good afternoon. Just a quick question on, you know, similar to the ES pricing and margin question earlier. I guess on solid waste, as you look across your portfolio, how is the pricing sort of discussion with the clients going? Is there, you know, more pushback, less pushback at this point in the cycle? Are you kinda get those of feedback, like, on that front? Just wondering, after fears of sort of higher pricing, things do seem to be moderating. Are customers still kind of okay with the spread? Just any feedback would be great.

Yeah. I mean, our pricing is obviously coming down from an ab when you look at our yield, over the past couple of years, but also our cost inflation is coming down as well, which we mentioned. And we're maintaining that spread. I think there was some fear that as price was gonna come down, cost wasn't, we were gonna get a price cost squeeze and we certainly haven't seen that. And a 3% inflationary environment is a really good spot for us to operate on that front. And, you know, we measure how much of our price sticks or retention rate, and that's remaining very, very healthy. On that front. So we're We got a lot of tools and sophistication in terms of who we price and how we price them. The team is doing a great job of giving customers, again, a price that they'll take, but also state. Because we wanna maintain that high level of loyalty that we have with our customers. Going forward. And I'd say the one opportunity we have on pricing, which continues to be, is in the municipal space. That's one on the restricted side. And that's just an area of the business in general where, you know, customers on balance are not paying their fair share. Right? We put an enormous amount of innovation, capital, and labor into that equation. And we have many attractive customers and contracts, but not all of them. Meet our standards. And so you'll continue to see us optimize that portfolio over the

Great. And then just one on the RNG facilities. I think we're looking for four to come online. I think two came online. Is that just the timing thing, or how are you thinking about the rest of the RNG facilities?

Yeah. It's more of a timing thing. There's a little bit of a rollover we would expect those two to come online in the first quarter. And so, again, from a contribution perspective, they're think of it like a 90-day delay.

Great. Very much. I'll pass the line.

Your next question today will come from Tobey Sommer with Truist Security. Please go ahead.

Thank you very much. With respect to the, you know, kind of employee attrition level, you said decade low. How much juice do you think is left in that lemon to kind of squeeze out? Because anytime you're at kind of a metric is at an unusual period, either peak or trough. I'm kind of curious what you might look to as leading indicators to signal that we might be approaching the end of that as a tailwind to margin.

Yeah. I mean, you think about that. You normally say, well, you know, achieve that in a very, you know, high unemployment environment. Where people are gonna have a hard time finding jobs externally, and so they're gonna keep the job they have. But we're at 4% unemployment. So you know, that labor market is still tight relative to, you know, a 20 or 30-year period. And I think a lot of it has to do with engagement. Right? It's how we compensate our general managers. Right? We think about paying them to achieve a financial outcome, to achieve a and to achieve an employee outcome. And they really put a lot of energy in making Republic a great place to work. And so, again, I think we've got the rate of improvement won't be 150 basis points this year. Right? I think it'll be more narrow than that, but we think we can continue to make progress.

And your next question today will come from Stephanie Moore of Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Sorry. This is Harold Antonoff, Stephanie Warren. So you guys talked about, you know, how to finish from overflowing bins. So I just wanna get a sense for how far you are through that process, implement those additional fees and that. How are conversations going with customers as you move from fixed rate contracts to alternative indices?

Yeah. Let me start with the latter as far as on the alternative indices. Since the beginning of when we started this initiative, we're 63% of those contracts have either been moved to an alternative indices like water sewer trash or garbage trash or a fixed rate that we would consider favorable.

Got it. Thank you for that color. And I guess just on the regulatory side, given your administration you guys are looking at or any other regulations.

On written prices, we assume very conservative assumptions on our project as we move forward. And you've seen your RINs prices come down, but now they're trending back up here over the last couple of weeks. On that front. So we remain enthusiastic about our landfill gas energy pipeline and the set of projects we're gonna have come online this year and in future years on that front. And then, you know, PFAS was a PFAS is a broad issue that society wants to address and take care of regard of regardless of political administration. There's still a lot of TBDs on kind of timing and pace of recovery. But we feel very good about our team and our capabilities in terms of our ability not only to catch it and treat it on the landfill side from a solid waste perspective, well, even more importantly, the opportunity upside to help customers from an ES standpoint. A solution standpoint, to take care of their issues, remediate facilities, and then ultimately find a final disposal for the material.

Thank you. I'll turn it over.

And your next question today will come from Brian Butler with Stifel. Please go ahead.

Hey. Thanks for taking the question. On the first one, just when you think on the RNG and sustainability adding kind of the $35 million in EBITDA in 2025. What? What's the capital spend with that? And then beyond 2025, what's remaining from a capital as well as an EBITDA contribution from future projects?

Well, if you remember, Brian, so we are developing our polymer centers as wholly owned facilities. So really, the only thing that's running through our CapEx is the investment in the polymer centers. Which is, you know, obviously embedded into our free cash flow guide. So for 2025, we look to spend another $75 million on polymer centers, which is relatively consistent with what you've seen over the last several years. So really not much of a change from what you've seen in the baseline. The other investments that we're making are more in the JVs, the partnerships themselves and in both the landfill gas to energy projects, as well as with Blue Polymers, we have a minority interest. So that investment comes through the statement of cash flows, but more like an acquisition would. As an other investing activity. And so if you take a look at next year, we would look to spend combined about $100 million in the investments in both of those JVs.

Okay. That's helpful. No. I get most of my questions answered, but I one out there. I mean, fundamentals look really good. A lot of know, fixed stuff on a lot of the programs you have internally. What are some of the risks out there that you see kind of strategically going forward from where we are today?

I think broader macro environment. Listen, we've lived through a pandemic and high inflation and war at the shore of Europe and other elements. So you know, macro slowdown in the economy, what happens with tariffs and impact on inflation, none of those things I would say, keep us up at night. But we're watchful and mindful of the macro environment in which we operate. On that front, in terms of what we can control, safety is our number one priority, so that's what we get up every day and focus on. And outside of that, we feel like the things in the business and in front of us are great.

Thank you.

And your next question today will come from Tony Bancroft with Gabelli Funds. Please go ahead.

Hey, gentlemen. Congratulations. Very well done. And just this one sort of runs along the lines of you know, your environmental solutions acquisition is obviously turned out very well and has a lot of potential opportunity going forward. Is there anything out there that you could see that could be a transformational type of acquisition that's either in, you know, in your space or maybe something different, something more on the sustainability side that you could see maybe this sort of longer term, maybe three to five years or longer?

Yeah. We maintain a perspective on everything and everybody, and know, any deal or opportunity of consequence, we're gonna have a perspective on. That being said, those things often are opportunistic and uncertain. So we don't build our strategy hinged on some type of bigger deal. And I think what you've seen over the last five years is we've driven a lot of value in the business by small and medium-sized deals and then really good execution organically as well. And I think that will be more of the same. It will keep our eyes open. And if there's big opportunities, we'll be certainly aggressive in considering those, but nothing is imminent.

Great. Well, great job. Thank you so much.

Thanks, Tony.

Your next question today will come from Konark Gupta with Scotia Capital. Please go ahead.

Thanks for taking my question. Know, I think a lot of questions have been asked here, but some sensitivity. You know, the commodity price environment is obviously not highly predictable right in think, like, the way you are kind of assuming your commodity price is for 2025, it seems like it's gonna be a decent headwind in 2025. If the commodity prices kind of start to move up higher than where you think they should be, you know, how should we think about the sensitivity to your earnings from that?

Yeah. Just and we disclosed this that on average, a $10 move in recycled commodity prices on our basket of goods is approximately $10 million of annual EBITDA. So even when you take a look at what recycled commodities are right now, $145 and we maintain, we assume that they stay flat throughout 2025, relative to the $165 average. It's down $20 million when you think about the EBITDA contribution, which isn't insignificant. But it's not overly material either. And so, again, just to give you an idea, if you see, you know, commodity prices moving, again, it's on our basket. You have the sensitivity, and you can expect that impact. From both the revenue and an EBITDA perspective for that $10 move.

Okay. That's great. Thanks. And if I can follow-up quickly on CNG tax credits. Apologies if I missed that comment before. I guess you're not assuming the credits for this year. And if so, they come through, what is a realistic set of assumptions there?

Yeah. On the CNG tax credit, again, it's approximately $20 million per year. For us, and we did not assume that those are renewed. So right now, that is not embedded in our 2025 guide.

Your next question today will come from Kevin Chiang with CIBC. Go ahead.

Hey. Thanks. One good afternoon, and thanks for taking my questions. Congrats on a strong end of the year. Here. You noted, I think, in your prepared remarks just, you know, some of your unique strategy. You know, your fleet's growing there. But I think earlier this year, California withdrew its waiver to the EPA, you know, related to some of its more stringent zero-emission vehicle policies. Just wondered, does that change how you think about EV spend? And I know some of these vehicles have gone into California. And do you throttle that back a little bit and maybe a more or less stringent regulatory environment as we vehicle emission.

No. It has not slowed down our pace there. There's lots of customer interest, lots of customer demand. There's certainly incentives, state and local that support us going in that direction, and we'll continue to deploy there. And more broadly, we're gonna be mindful. We have no locked-in EV strategy in terms of the exact number of vehicles they're gonna purchase by year. We're gonna make sure that it's a superior product. Right? It says zero-emission vehicle that's quiet, safe. It's great for our employees as well. And so we're gonna make sure that where that's deployed, the municipal space, that we're getting a premium offering, a premium price for that product. And we see a good line of sight to customer demand that front, and so we'll go where customer demand takes us. But confidence that even with any administration change here, there's a path forward on EV.

Okay. And then just maybe on turnover, great job there. But I guess, you know, a lot of the headlines we're seeing around this changes in US immigration policy. You know, you are seeing or we are hearing from some companies, and they are seeing an impact. I'm just wondering, are you seeing or are you envisioning downstream impacts? Like, I can imagine your direct employee base isn't impacted by this, but know, in markets that get tighter in terms of labor, there could be a downstream impact, which is the overall labor forces. It's trending. Just wondering, are the markets that you're trying to see some of this? Potential downstream impact? And guess it's not floating to your numbers today, but anything that you're keeping an eye out for or regions that might become a little bit more problematic from a labor availability perspective?

Yeah. In terms of our own labor force, or where we do have third parties that support us, the compliance has always been a huge part of our culture, so we don't see that as any type of threat or challenge. I think more broadly, if you look at the end markets we serve, right, there's been a lot of talk about construction. Right, in that part. And I think the biggest driver there is gonna be mortgage rates. Labor supply could be an issue on that front too. We'll see how that develops. So we'll keep an eye toward that. But I don't think that's gonna be a major concern for us.

That's great color. Thanks. And best of luck as you execute on 2025 here.

Thanks.

Your next question today will come from James Schumm with TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Hey. Thanks. Good quarter, guys. Can you just one quick one for me. Can you give an update on the truck supply chain? Is that fully resolved? Are you still seeing any issues getting your trucks? And then sort of related, like, where are you now in terms of your ASL conversions and then, you know, CNG truck conversions. How are you guys thinking about that? And, you know, if there's additional opportunity for margin expansion over the next couple of years.

Yeah. The supply chain is caught up in terms of what they're delivering. And kind of getting back. We have a very ratable replacement philosophy with our vehicles and fleet, and we find the optimal kind of CapEx OpEx trade-off for when to retire vehicles. And we'll kind of be hitting that mark by the throughout this year and certainly by the end of the year, we'll be at our optimal point. So really thankful for our suppliers who have been able to help us over-deliver over the last 18 months to get caught up in that respect. You know, on automation, we're about 77% automated. We have a few points of opportunity over time. They'll come with specific contracts or more in the onesie-twosie environment. So that's not gonna be a huge driver of performance. But we'll continue to go there. And then CNG, we've maintained CNG fleet in the last five years we believe electrification is a superior product. CNG is better than diesel for the environment, but it's not a zero-emission product, and we think electrification is much more beneficial for the environment, and that's where we see customer pull. So that's where we put our energy.

Okay. Great. Understood. Thanks, guys.

Your next question today will come from Devin Dodge with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Yes. Thanks. Good afternoon. Just one clarification from me, and apologies if I missed it, but of the $1 billion plus M&A spending target in 2025, it sounded like the deals completed say, in the first six weeks of the year are included in the guide. Just one, is that correct? And two, if that is correct, can you give us a sense for how much that $1 billion has been deployed already?

Yeah. So for deals that have been completed through today, that revenue contribution and the, you know, the related financial outcomes are included in our guidance. So, basically, anything closed through today is included. Anything thereafter that we would complete is not. So and right now, if you think about the billion-dollar spend, a good portion of that has been spent already at this point. So, again, we feel really good about that target for the full year. And we'll give you the details obviously in April after Q1 results come up.

Alright. Sounds good. Thank you.

This time, there appear to be no further questions. Mr. Vander Ark, I'll turn the call back over to you for closing remarks.

Thank you, Nick. I wanna thank the Republic Services team for their great work in 2024. Their focus on safety, sustainability, and exceeding customer expectations led to another year of great results and positions us well for continued growth. Have a good evening, and be safe.

Ladies and gentlemen, this will conclude the conference call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.