Hello everyone and welcome to Revitty’s third quarter 2024 earnings conference call. My name is Lydia and I will be your Operator today. After the prepared questions, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. If you’d like to ask a question during Q&A, you can do so by pressing star followed by one on your telephone keypad. I’ll now hand you over to Steve Willoughby, Head of Investor Relations to begin. Please go ahead.

Thank you Operator. Good morning everyone and welcome to Revitty’s third quarter 2024 earnings conference call. On the call with me today are Prahlad Singh, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Max Krakowiak, our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. I’d like to remind you of the Safe Harbor statements outlined in our press release issued earlier this morning and also those in our SEC filings. Statements or comments made on this call may be forward-looking statements which may include but may not be limited to financial projections or other statements of the company’s plans, objectives, expectations or intentions. The company’s actual results may differ significantly from those projected or suggested due to a variety of factors which are discussed in detail in our SEC filings. Any forward-looking statements made today represent our views as of today. We disclaim any obligation to update these forward-looking statements in the future, even if our estimates change, so you should not rely on any of today’s statements as representing our views as of any date after today. During this call, we will be referring to certain non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of the measures we plan to use during this call to the most directly comparable GAAP measures is available as an attachment to our earnings press release. I’ll now turn it over to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Prahlad Singh. Prahlad?

Thank you Steve, and good morning everyone. Revitty’s strong execution was again on display during the third quarter, which enabled our total revenue, adjusted operating margin and adjusted EPS to each come in better than we had anticipated. Our strong execution led to our adjusted operating margins increasing by 80 basis points year-over-year to 28.3% in the quarter, which shows the positive impact our productivity initiatives are having on our cost base and incrementals. We also had another great quarter from a cash perspective as well. We generated $135 million of free cash flow in the quarter, resulting in 100% conversion to our adjusted net income so far this year. Given our strong cash performance, we remained aggressive with our share repurchase program and returned over 100% of our cash flow in the quarter to shareholders via buybacks and dividends. As we look ahead to the final quarter of the year, we expect our diagnostic businesses to continue to perform at a very strong level, and we are continuing to experience positive momentum in our life sciences, reagents, and software businesses. In addition, given that as of September, we lapped the one-year anniversary of the most significant pharma industry pressures seen in many years, we remain optimistic that market trends are continuing to stabilize and that the worst of the headwinds are likely behind us. However, since we have yet to see a more material conversion of our funnel into orders, we are now factoring in a more subdued end-of-year spending environment for instrumentation from our pharma customers as compared to our previous expectations. This is in part due to the continued delays with instrument purchasing in China as stimulus has still not yet begun to meaningfully flow, resulting in customers remaining on the sidelines while they wait to receive…

Thanks Prahlad, and good morning everyone. As Prahlad mentioned, we performed well in the third quarter and were again able to exceed our earnings expectations for the quarter. I was also extremely pleased to see our focus on cash generation continued as our free cash flow conversion to adjusted net income remains 100% year-to-date, which is truly outstanding performance. Pharma biotech demand continued to remain stable with year-over-year growth returning for our life sciences reagents, while instruments continue to remain under pressure, particularly in China, and was down more than we had anticipated overall. This was offset by strong performance in our diagnostics businesses across both reproductive health and immunodiagnostics. As we look ahead, we continue to feel that the worst is likely behind us in the markets which have been under pressure over the last two years, as the demand recovery is continuing its path towards more normalized growth rates in the future. Our diagnostics and software businesses continue to perform at a very high level given their strong underlying market trends, significant innovation, and consistently strong commercial execution. As we had suggested a quarter ago, we became more active with our buyback activity in the quarter, which we anticipate will likely continue given our strong balance sheet and cash flow performance this year. Our future remains extremely bright and we believe being more aggressive with our repurchases in the near term will provide significant returns for our shareholders. Now turning to the specifics of our third quarter performance, overall the company generated total adjusted revenues of $684 million in the quarter, resulting in 2% growth in organic revenue, which was line with our expectations. FX was neutral to growth and we again had no incremental contribution from acquisitions. As it relates to our P&L, we generated 28.3% adjusted…

Thank you. [Operator instructions] Our first question today comes from Mike Ryskin with Bank of America. Your line is open, please go ahead.

Great, thanks for taking the question, and congrats on the quarter, guys. Max, maybe first one for you. You just touched on it a little bit there in terms of the moving pieces in the quarter and how that impacted your 4Q outlook. I just want to clarify a couple things - you know, you touched on instruments a couple times, you touched on pharma and biotech, you touched on China. Could you break those down a little bit and maybe de-convolute for us what changed in the quarter and how that’s driving your new view, just how much of it is instruments in China versus instruments globally, pharma and biotech in China versus pharma and biotech globally? Just want to get a clearer picture of what changed and what’s really behind the increased caution for 4A.

Yes, hey Mike. As we looked at our full year outlook as a result of the third quarter performance and the expectation for the fourth quarter, really the change in our organic growth assumptions of going from the 2% to the zero to 1% range was all driven by the instrumentation assumptions, so it was the slightly weaker performance in the third quarter and then a reduced outlook on the return to the normal seasonality in the fourth quarter, so that is really the fundamental driving change. I would say as you look at the pharma biotech dynamic, that is a majority of where our instrumentation is sold to, so that is the biggest end market; and I think as you look at it globally, China was definitely a bigger piece than we had anticipated - as we mentioned, customers are pausing as they await for stimulus. U.S. and Europe, I would say were relatively in line to maybe slightly lower than our expectations, but the U.S. is definitely probably the one market that continues, I would say, to return to normal faster than the other regions.

Okay, that’s helpful. Then for my follow-up, I know you don’t typically guide to 2025 at this point, but maybe I’ll just ask sort of a framing question. A couple of your counterparts have given some early commentary on 2025, just given it’s still a very fluid environment. You’re exiting this year at about 4% organic for the fourth quarter. Your LRP is 6 to 8. Just given everything you said about China and instruments, it doesn’t seem like 2025 is going to be a normal year. Is 4% to 5%, maybe 4%, kind of where you guys are in fourth quarter, is that a good starting off point for us to think about next year for organic growth, and what are the puts and takes for that? Thanks.

Hey Mike, this is Prahlad. Let me help with that question. You know, we will provide guidance on 2025 at our 4Q call, but I will say that it appears that the worst is behind us and demand has started to recover. What we just really need to see is what is the rate of recovery and how quickly it normalizes. Our plan is to take the next couple of months to have the best read as possible at the time, and I really feel strongly that normalization will likely take us into the first quarter or the first half of 2025.

Okay, thanks a lot.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Vijay Kumar with Evercore ISI. Please go ahead.

Hi guys, thanks for taking my question. Prahlad, maybe my first one on what happened in the quarter phasing, where it looks like instrument’s applied genomics was the major delta, was that--did things worsen as the quarter progressed or was this more perhaps the lack of recovery towards the end of the quarter, and what does Q4 assuming for instrumentation applied genomics, and if the guide here can deliver enough, in your mind?

Yes Vijay, good morning. As we said in our prepared remarks, the fact is that we are seeing sequential improvement quarter-over-quarter, which is a very good sign that we see continued stabilization, and as I said to Mike’s question, we really feel that the worst is behind us. But the fact is that the path to normalization may take a little longer than previously expected, which is primarily the reason for us lowering our instrument expectations for 4Q24. Specifically as Max mentioned, the instruments in China were worse because of the pause or the delay in the expectation from our customers as to when the stimulus funding comes, is when they will release it, which we now see into the first half of 2025 or more--you know, going into the first quarter of 2025. That’s the way I would calibrate. I don’t think--things are not going worse, things continue to sequentially get better. Probably the path to it is more, I would say, gradual than as we would have expected an uplift coming into the fourth quarter. Max, anything to add there?

No.

Understood. Maybe a further follow-up here, I think the share repo stood out with the new authorization. Your $150 million in repo implies the average share price of around current levels - $120-ish. I guess given where the stock is right now, how should we be thinking about the pacing, will Revitty be more opportunistic around share repurchases in the near term, and--sorry, just to clarify, is applied genomics and instrumentation expected to grow in Q4? I know some of the comps get easier. If you could clarify that, thank you.

Yes, I can clarify on the numbers before Prahlad can jump in on the share repurchasing, Vijay. From a numbers perspective in the fourth quarter, we now expect instrumentation on the life sciences side to be declining mid single digits, and for our applied genomics business, we anticipate roughly flat levels to what we saw here in the third quarter.

Thanks Max. On the share repo, Vijay, as I said in our prepared remarks, we continue and the board continues to be very optimistic about our future performance and what it will mean for our company, and we plan to remain active with our purchasing activity on the share side. As you mentioned, the board recently approved the billion dollar repurchase authorization for the next two years - you know, the new authorization and its size should speak for itself about the confidence and what you saw with our strong cash flow performance and the balance sheet stability, but also more importantly recognizing the potential that we have in front of us and from an investor awareness and understanding perspective.

Understood. Thanks guys.

Our next question comes from Dan Leonard with UBS. Please go ahead.

Thank you. I want to make sure I better understand the trends in reproductive health. That, I think it was a low double-digit growth rate in newborn screening. How much of that was China compared to growth worldwide, and what does that look like in the Year of the Snake as opposed to Year of the Dragon?

Yes, let me start with the horoscope part first, Dan - good morning.

Good morning.

The Year of the Dragon definitely helped, but it was--you know, we have started seeing improvements in births, but we haven’t seen it to the level, for example when the last Year of the Dragon happened, which was--you know, whenever it was, this is more subdued than that, and we expect the improvement or the increase in births to China to continue. The government has taken a lot of measures and continues to be very diligent, and it’s something of extreme focus for them. We do expect it to gradually improve, but not going back to what it was the last time this happened, and the next year is the Year of the Snake, which is considered a smaller dragon, so we expect that to be a positive trend.

Yes, I would just say as we look at the new reproductive health performance overall, to your point, Dan, it is driven by the strong performance in our newborn business globally growing low double digits. China grew in the high single digits in the quarter, so the rest of the globe grew a little bit faster than that. I think it’s a combination of two things: one, we continue to see traction on our commercial initiatives around geographic and menu expansion for our reagent portfolio, and then secondly there were some, I would say higher level instrument placements in the period as some customers refreshed their budgets, based on their fiscal calendar.

Okay, thank you. Just to stick with China diagnostics for a moment, can you comment on immunodiagnostics performance in China and what is the outlook there? A couple of the peers have flagged incremental headwinds.

Yes, so as we look at the China immunodiagnostics performance, it was right in line with expectation. The Q4 assumption has not changed for that business. For the full year, we anticipate that business to be growing roughly around mid single digits in China, and so I think for that, it’s kind of steady as she goes. Again, I think we’ve mentioned that our immunodiagnostics business in China is not like the other diagnostics players, so I would caution referencing their commentary and linking it directly to our business.

Perfect, thank you.

Thank you. Next in queue, we have Andrew Cooper with Raymond James. Your line is open.

Hey, thanks everybody. Good morning. Maybe just a quick one - you know, last quarter we spent a little bit of time talking about some of the innovation in TB in terms of the additional automation. Would love just sort of an update there, how that’s trended through the quarter, and where we are in terms of U.S. launch, hopefully, with that updated automation, and then I have a follow-up as well.

Hey, good morning Andrew. On the TB, we expect the launch now to be more in first quarter of 2025, so it did get pushed out from what we expected it to be in the fourth quarter with some questions that we are going back, responding to, and be more of a 1Q 2025 launch.

Okay, helpful. Then I’m sure we’ll talk more in a few weeks about it, but just given the size of the repo authorization over the next few years, should we be reading anything into how you think about M&A and capital deployment from that, and maybe just in addition to that, what are you seeing in the M&A pipeline in terms of seller behavior? Any changes in terms of activity in the environment or anything you could call out there would be great.

Yes, it’s a very good question. Look, I have said this before and I’ll say it again, we will continue to remain active and diligent on building a strong pipeline on the M&A. It’s just that the targets that we are looking at and the valuation expectations, I don’t think have changed a whole lot, and I think from our perspective, we see a lot more value right now within our own valuation and we want to make sure that we take advantage of that opportunity.

Okay, I’ll stop there and hop back in the queue. Thank you.

Thank you.

The next question comes from Luke Sergott with Barclays. Please go ahead.

Great, thanks guys. Good morning. I just wanted to dig in here on the drug discovery side. A lot of mixed signals coming here from various CROs and then from the other tools players, especially when we have the midyear cuts and pipeline rationalizations continuing, especially on large pharma, so could you guys just give us a view of how you guys are seeing it, any impacts there to the quarter and to the updated outlook? Reagents came in a lot better than we expected. Just kind of want to understand the puts and takes there.

Yes, hey Luke. I think we’ve covered it broadly in the script, as well as some of this initial Q&A, but really the change in the market versus what our anticipation was coming into the third quarter is really related to, I would say, just the instruments normalization not happening as quickly as we had anticipated. Things are definitely not getting worse, but it is a slower rate of recovery. I think as you look at the other areas of our business that are exposed to the preclinical--you know, drug discovery areas, reagents performed well in the period, again returning to mid-single digits growth that was relatively in line with our expectations, and as you look at the fourth quarter, we’re expecting a similar volume level from our reagents business. I think also on the software side, our software business continues to perform well. We anticipate that business potentially here growing low double digits for the full year and we’re excited about the potential of that business over the next two to three years.

Great, thanks. Then I guess when you guys think about the China stimulus, I didn’t think you guys had much stimulus baked into the prior guide, and so now that you’re--when you’re talking about the instrument weakness particularly in China around the stimulus, kind of resulting in the guide down, give us an update, like what happened there, and more longer term, how do you guys view this stimulus flowing through and how your funnel is building there?

Hey Luke, you’re right - our expectations were not much, but actually the performance came out worse in the sense that customers who we expected [indiscernible] stimulus also have taken a pause to see if they’re able to get funding, and that’s where we saw worse performance in China vis-à-vis the stimulus.

Okay, great. Thanks guys.

The next question comes from Dan Brennan with TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Great, thank you. Thanks for the questions. Sorry to go back to the fourth quarter, but I just want to fully understand what’s changed, if I can just run through some quick math. If instruments are 12% of revenues, and I believe previously you were thinking kind of a nice recovery in 4Q, maybe the mid-teens, that would get you to your total company growth rate, which is around 10%, and now if you’re saying instruments are down 5, I would assume there’s changes to the other parts of the business, otherwise I would need instruments to be down 30 to get to your new guidance of 4. Can you just maybe walk through beyond instruments, kind of what else maybe might have changed in terms of the applied guide for the fourth quarter?

Yes, hey Dan. I think the other piece you’ve got to factor in too is the applied genomics business as well, if you’re just looking at the life sciences instrumentation piece of the overall business. The other piece I would mention as well is, look - as you look at the second half guide, as I mentioned, really the only thing that has fundamentally changed is our assumptions on the life sciences instruments and applied genomics. The rest of the business is in line with our expectations and for what we had set out for the second half of the year.

Okay, that’s fine. We can cover it maybe offline too as well, Max. Thank you. Then maybe just a high level one, the election’s tomorrow, just wondering if Trump is elected, just wondering how we might think about possible implications. Who knows what ultimately will pass, but he’s talking about super high tariffs on imports from China, 20% tariffs on rest of world, and who knows what kind of reaction China would have. But we have a predicate a little bit going back to the last time he was president, so Prahlad, I know you were just over in China, just how we think about the possible impacts and any planning strategies that you could make to mitigate some of this. Thank you.

Good morning Dan. You know, the last thing I want to do is speculate on elections at our quarterly earnings call. The results will be what the results will be. From our perspective as a company and as most of our peers and the whole industry, we all prepare for all scenarios. I think it would be best to see what the results of the elections are, and we have an investors call coming up in three quarter. Long term from China’s perspective, as you know very well, Dan, what we have done is we have--you know, our strategy has been in China for China, and that has worked during all the election cycles, and we’re very confident in the ability to continue to execute for our customers in China from China.

Great, thank you.

The next question comes from Puneet Souda with Leerink Partners. Your line is open.

Yes, hi Prahlad. Thanks for the questions. The reagents business was up mid single digits, and I’m sure we’re going to get more details on that at the investor day; but just can you elaborate what’s sort of behind that from the BioLegend customers? Peers are still down in the REO antibodies business, so obviously this is better versus the peers, but just you talked about North America and Europe being positive, but biopharma and academic were both down low single digits, so just trying to parse out what’s happening in the reagents business and maybe what customers or applications where you are seeing the traction, or is it just largely comps?

Hey, good morning Puneet. No, I think it’s continued sequential improvement as you look at it through quarter by quarter, and I think that speaks to somewhat on the diversity of our portfolio on the reagent side. Obviously you mentioned BioLegend, but there’s RNA from Dharmacon, our HTRF [indiscernible]. The whole portfolio continues to do very well globally, so I think it’s not just one segment that I would call out that outperformed. Our overall reagents business in pharma biotech continues to perform to our expectations, and I would say that speaks to the strength and the diversity, and it relates to pharma programs, whether it’s around GLP-1s or others, where we continue to see traction with that portfolio.

Got it, and then in China, just wondering given the challenges you’re seeing with instrumentation and your recent visit there, what’s your sense and the level of confidence about instrumentation purchases if the stimulus was to come through; and again, the timing of that hasn’t been super clear, but just wondering if you can elaborate more there on the instrumentation side of China. Thank you.

Sure. You know, we’ve continued to remain very optimistic on the stimulus program and overall on the pipeline and the portfolio that we have. The number of proposals that the team is working on day and night in submitting on the stimulus programs gives us a strong degree of confidence irrespective of the yield that we would get out of the stimulus. Look, the government is serious about ensuring that the economic activity takes an uplift. They are strongly supportive of the life sciences and diagnostic tools sector, and that behooves well for us and our peer group. I would say the way I would assess this and calibrate it is that, yes, it did not happen in 4Q of 2024 and it’s more of a 2025 activity, but at the same time, it also gives you a sense of seriousness and diligence that both the government and those that are applying for these loans are putting in place, so we expect this to be a driver for growth in 2025.

Got it, thank you.

Next, we have Dan Arias with Stifel. Your line is open.

Hey, good morning guys, thank you. Prahlad, I wanted to actually take the opposite side of that China question there. Just based on your visit, what are you hearing from customers and your sales teams when it comes to 2025 demand outside the stimulus dynamic and outside of the instrument dynamic? I know it can be hard to separate out the government health component, but I’m just curious about overall sentiment on reagents, budgets, etc. specifically as it relates to the next 12 months or the next 14 months, more than the multi-year. I know everybody still feels okay about the multi-year outlook.

That’s a great question, Dan. As I said, just two weeks ago, I spent a week in China meeting with government officials, customers. We have a strong KOL and advisory board, and we spent four hours with them going through market trends, end markets, what’s happening, and most importantly with our team. I will say this unequivocally, the sentiment remains strong especially in our sector. There’s a lot of optimism. There is a clarity on the government side to infuse elements that help to ensure that the economic recovery continues to be robust, and more importantly our customers are telling that the products that we have put in place, the pipeline that we have coming out both on the diagnostic and the life sciences side are something that is relevant for the market and will gain traction. I think at a high level, what I’ll leave you with is that our strategy of in China for China is working and is one that we will continue to deploy. As I mentioned in my prepared remarks, we just launched the Revitty innovation center in Taicang - it’s a facility where we now have a fully contiguous competency and capability around early discovery development, manufacturing, and we’ve put all these elements in place over the last several years to ensure that irrespective of the insulation that the market has to--if the market has to go through, our team in China is fully enabled to execute on its own.

Okay. Max, just really quickly, do you have a regional forecast for China for 4Q?

Yes, I think as we look at the fourth quarter for China, we anticipate it growing in the mid single digits - that’s predominantly driven by our diagnostics performance in the fourth quarter, as we had previously mentioned that we do expect diagnostics to perform well in the fourth quarter. We also have a little bit of easier comps. We’re not really assuming any change in the market environment on the life sciences side.

Okay, thank you.

The next question comes from Matt Sykes with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Prahlad, maybe a high level question for you first. Given that you kind of launched the transformation of this business into an increasingly weaker environment, we haven’t really been able to see the power of that transformation. We know that the recurring revenue is significantly higher than it had been in the past, but as you think about going into recovery and the operating leverage that this new business has, is that why some of the recovery that we’re seeing could be more gradual, just because of that level of recurring revenue, or do you feel like the operating leverage is still there in this business with a smaller portion of instrument, but still there? Just kind of how are you thinking about what revenue looks like into a recovery as we think about ’25?

Hey, good morning Matt. I think maybe just to take a step back, yes, I fully appreciate that the market conditions have been weak and we launched Revitty in the midst of that; but I do want to make sure that we don’t lose sight of the fact that despite, I would say, anemic organic growth, we’ve increased our operating margin 80 basis points year-over-year in the quarter and that that shows--I mean, if you look at our cost basis incrementals, our strong cash flow performance, this is all because of the strategic aspects that we put into the place, and it is a direct result of that. If we are able to execute, Matt, at such a strong level in an anemic market environment, imagine what the strength of the portfolio will be when the markets turn around. In regards to the market, I will say that if you look at the reagents portfolio performance in the quarter, it is starting to show signs of stabilization and improvement, and as I have said earlier, the reagents are the first peek into the recovery, that’s why I keep going back to the fact I’m saying that we have started seeing stabilization, we feel that the worst is over. I think obviously the instruments are a big swing factor, and that’s the impact that we are seeing; but overall, we see the reagents essentially coming back to what we hope in 2025.

Got it. Thank you for that. Max, just drilling a little bit more on the life sciences side on the margins, you mentioned that margins were pressured obviously due to lower volumes, but also investments. Can you maybe talk about what some of those investments are, and in terms of how we should think about Q4 and beyond, will those investments start to trail off a little bit as we continue the volume recovery to get a bigger level of margin expansion?

Yes, hey Matt, in terms of the investments on the life sciences side, a couple of the more strategic areas of investment have been, one, around the GMP facility which we’ve talked about. Those that will be out in San Diego with us for the investor day will get a chance to see it, which will be exciting. I think the second piece is around ecommerce and getting to one platform for us as a company; and then the third one is really around our signals portfolio. We’ve launched a couple products in the first half of this year, we continue to have a road map with additional launches here over the next couple years, and so that business will continue to be in a heavy investment cycle. As I step back again, and maybe just reiterating some of the comments Prahlad mentioned in terms of our overall operating margin, we’re maintaining our full year 2024 operating margin despite cutting our organic growth here around 2% to now the zero to 1% range. You could read into that and argue that if we had held the organic growth guidance, we would have already been at the upper end of our operating margin, if not above it, and I think that that gives you a little bit of insight into, one, the execution the team is having on our productivity initiatives and driving our integration synergies, but also the power and potential of our incrementals in the business once we return to a more normalized market environment.

Thank you very much.

Our next question comes from Brandon Couillard with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.

Thanks, good morning. Two questions for you, Max - hopefully I can squeeze them both in here. You talked about tax planning initiatives and the effective rate continues to trend below target. Do you think [indiscernible] assumption going forward? Then secondly for cash flow conversion, obviously it’s been solid year to date. Do you still think there’s more juice to squeeze from working capital as you move into ’25? Can you maintain 100% conversion next year? Thanks.

Yes, hey Brandon. First, I’ll start with the tax planning question. Again, we had revamped our tax team coming into this year, and I think we’ve seen the fruits and the benefits of that team and their execution. We have now lowered our full year expectation to 19%. I would say that most of those benefits we’ve received this year are structural in nature, and so we have essentially lowered our tax rates going forward, so that has been encouraging progress year to date. I would say on the second one from a free cash flow conversion, again this year it’s been incredibly strong performance. I do think there is still room to go from a working capital improvement standpoint, although the team has made tremendous progress this year with the increased focus, as well as improving some of our operating processes and leveraging more digital capabilities. As we look into outer years, we’ve already gone over that this business should be normally running at greater than 85% free cash flow conversion. We’ve also mentioned that we’re going to continue to have a step up in capex, which is offsetting, where we’re basically self-funding some of that step-up in capex with the improved working capital performance is probably the best way to think about it.

Great, thanks.

The next question comes from Patrick Donnelly with Citi. Your line is open.

Hey guys, thanks for taking the questions. Max, maybe a follow-up on some of the margin conversation a minute ago. I guess when you think about, just high level, the moving pieces into next year, obviously the growth should hopefully come back a bit. I would think the mix, particularly from reagents, picks up a little bit - I know that’s a higher margin business for you guys, it would be beneficial. Could you just talk about high level tailwinds, headwinds in the margin piece? You know, other companies have talked about things like incentive comp coming back, so would love to just talk about that high level bridge and make sure we’re thinking about it appropriately.

Yes, hey Patrick. You know, again I think we’re going to reserve official 2025 commentary until our Q4 call. I think as you look at some of the dynamics that will play out next year, one is, I think, really just the biggest assumption of what market environment we’re going to look into. I think we’ve been out there and mentioned that if we are growing in line with a normalized market environment, we’ve talked about 75 basis points of operating margin expansion. If it’s a little bit lower than that, something in the 2% to 3% overall market range, we’d probably be closer to a 50 BPs operating margin expansion. I think we’ve already put those framing comments out there. I wouldn’t say there’s anything I would have to call out in terms of a known headwind for us next year. I think we’ve already normalized our cost base as we’ve headed into this year.

Okay, that’s helpful. Then maybe just a follow-up on some of the reagents conversations earlier. We’ve gotten a bunch of questions as the quarter went about things like the preclinical side - I think Luke touched on that a little bit. Can you just talk about your exposure on that front, what you’re seeing from that customer base, and just the right way to think about what the recovery path in reagents looks like - again, nice to see it back to mid single digit growth here. Just trying to think about the go-forward just given some of the noise, particularly from the early stage customers, what your exposure is there would be helpful. Thank you guys.

Let me help with that one - hey, Patrick. As you know, the majority of our reagents are in the preclinical side of the business, given that our focus is on discovery and early discovery with pharma biotech. To your point, I think that’s why it’s a lot more encouraging to see that business coming back to growth and the reagents starting to perform well. As I mentioned earlier to, I think it was Luke’s question, we’ve seen broad-based recovery across our different business lines on the reagent side, so it’s not that I could highlight one product line or one business line and say that has done well. I think that is why--that is what we feel encouraging about the portfolio there, that whether it’s Eliza, STRF, or BioLegend, Dharmacon, all of these product lines have done well.

Our final question today comes from Jack Meehan with Nephron Research. Please go ahead.

Thank you, good morning. Was wondering if you could unpack the low double-digit newborn growth in the quarter. What were you seeing in terms of prenatal in China and just how that’s folding into the expectations for newborn screening? Thank you.

Yes, so I think again as we look at the reproductive health performance in the quarter, Jack, I would say it’s strong performance really globally. Newborn screening globally again was up low double digits growth. I think as you look at prenatal, it was also a strong performance in the period. I think part of that--again, I had mentioned some of that was capex related and some instrument placements, but then also there were pockets of actual underlying reagent growth and increase in screening. China was one of those geographies that also had the increase in screening, which again is linking to our expectations around the newborn business in China for the fourth quarter.

Got it, and then can you give us an update how did Revitty Omics perform, and I know you’re not giving 2025 thoughts now, but maybe just any color on how the pipeline is shaping up there. Thanks.

I’ll start with the pipeline. The pipeline continues to be extremely robust. I think it’s something that we’re incredibly excited about over the next couple years. I think as we look at the performance of the business, Jack, last year was down 40% almost. I think for this year, we’ve returned to positive growth. I think it’s been relatively consistent over the course of the year. It adds a little bit of tailwind to reproductive health overall, but it’s definitely not driving the strong performance.

Thank you. We have no further questions, so I’ll hand back to Steve Willoughby for any closing comments.

Thank you Lydia, and thank you everyone for your time this morning. We look forward to seeing everyone in a few weeks on November 21, either virtually or hopefully out in person in San Diego. Have a good day.

This concludes our call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your line.