Good afternoon. And thank you for attending today’s SentinelOne Earnings Conference Call. My name is Jason, and I will be the moderator for today’s call. All lines will be muted during the presentation portion of the call with an opportunity for questions-and-answers at the end. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to past conference over to our host, Doug Clark.

Good afternoon, everyone. And welcome to SentinelOne’s earnings call for the third quarter of fiscal year 2023 ended October 31st. With us today are Tomer Weingarten, CEO; and Dave Bernhardt, our CFO. Our press release and shareholder letter were issued earlier today and are posted on our website. This call is being broadcast live via webcast. And following the call, an audio replay will be available on the Investor Relations section of our website. I would like to remind you that during today’s call, we will be making forward-looking statements regarding future events and financial performance, including our guidance for the fourth fiscal quarter and full fiscal year 2023, as well as certain long-term financial targets. We caution you that such statements reflect our best judgment based on factors currently known to us and that actual events or results could differ materially. Please refer to the documents that we file from time-to-time with the SEC, in particular, our annual report on Form 10-K and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, including our filings for Q2. These documents contain and identify important risk factors and other information that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in our forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements made during this call are being made as of today. If this call is replayed or reviewed after today, the information presented during the call may not contain current or accurate information. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements publicly or to update the reasons the actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements even if new information becomes available in the future. During this call, unless otherwise stated, we will discuss non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. A reconciliation of the GAAP and non-GAAP results is provided in today’s press release and in our shareholder letter. And with that, let me turn the call over to Tomer Weingarten, CEO of SentinelOne.

Good afternoon, everyone. And thank you for joining our fiscal third quarter earnings call. We reported another quarter of triple-digit revenue and ARR growth combined with significant margin expansion, meaningfully ahead of our guidance. Once again, we achieved a Rule of 60, we were raising our full year revenue and margin expectations. While the impact of macro challenges has become more pronounced, cybersecurity remains mission-critical. Most importantly, our autonomous technology is best-in-class. Our platform is purpose-built for leading efficacy, cost efficiency, scalability and ease of use. We remain well positioned to help enterprises stay protected and realize a superior return on their cybersecurity spend. On today’s call, I will focus on two key areas; one, details of our quarterly performance including customer growth and expansion, as well as the broader demand and macro dynamics; and two, the actions we are taking to enable our path to profitability and execute in today’s environment. Financially, we have taken a more prudent approach to investments like moderating new headcount growth. And operationally, we are streamlining our teams to unlock higher productivity and performance. Let’s first turn the discussion to our quarterly performance. We once again delivered triple-digit revenue and ARR growth fueled by the adoption of our Singularity XDR platform across endpoint, cloud and identity. We are taking market share and we achieved a Rule of 60 again in the third quarter. We have consistently combined rapid growth with meaningful margin improvement, showcasing strong unit economics and scalability of our business model. We have expanded operating margin by over 25 percentage points year-over-year for five consecutive quarters. We expect that to continue in Q4. Let me highlight some of the key strengths of our business from the quarter. Around the world, we are protecting more enterprises than ever before. We added over 600…

Tomer, thank you. I will discuss our quarterly financial highlights and provide additional context around our guidance for Q4 and fiscal year 2023. As a reminder, all margins discussed are non-GAAP unless otherwise stated. We once again delivered high growth combined with meaningful margin expansion, showcasing the efficiency of our business model and strong unit economics. We are raising our full year revenue and margin expectations again. In the third quarter, we achieved year-over-year revenue and ARR growth of 106% and ARR grew to $487 million. We had a net new ARR of $49 million in the quarter, driven by a combination of new and existing customers. Compared to our expectations, the lower net new ARR was largely due to macroeconomic conditions impacting the timing and size of new enterprise deals. In general, these are not lost opportunities. In many cases, we have either closed the deals in our fourth quarter or secured technical wins and are awaiting deal closure. We saw similar dynamics across geographies with international markets facing incremental FX related pressure. Nonetheless, we are still delivering significant growth. We achieved a healthy mix of new customer additions and existing customer renewals and upsells. Our customers with ARR over $100,000 grew nearly 100% year-over-year to 827, much faster than the total customer count and growth from customers with ARR over $1 million for even faster. One reminder on customer count is that we count each MSSP as a single customer. Therefore, with some direct SMB customers facing budgetary pressures, much of that impact is offset by the strength and shift to our MSSP ecosystem. Our ARR per customer increased sequentially, reflecting the strength of our business among large enterprises and the adoption of more of the Singularity XDR platform in spite of recessionary concerns. There were no outsized…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Saket Kalia with Barclays. Your line is now open.

Okay. Hey. Good afternoon, guys. Thanks for taking my questions here. Tomer, maybe just for you, a lot of helpful commentary around the macro, and clearly, it’s hitting everyone. So probably not much of a surprise either. But I was wondering if you could just talk a little bit about the competitive landscape a bit, and in particular, Microsoft. I am wondering if you see them more in customer evaluations and how you think customers are viewing a Microsoft Defender option versus a specialist tool like Singularity or like other next-gen solutions out there, any thoughts?

Yes. I think that, by and large, the competitive dynamics stays relatively the same as we have seen in the past few quarters, past couple of years. All in all, folks look at best-of-breed security pretty much in the same token as they have had. It’s also worth mentioning that while Microsoft offering as it pertains to the software piece might be included and perceived as free. If you look at integration costs, management costs and then DDR services or any affiliated service that actually bumps up the price in a pretty significant manner. So if you look at the overall TCO, it stays relatively comparable with best-of-breed offerings. The second dynamic I want to highlight is that we have seen more and more Microsoft displacements, customers rebounding from Microsoft offering. Some citing it as eventually an eventual cost terms, the most expensive solution they had to manage over the years. So we feel the competitive environment versus Microsoft is relatively sustained. We haven’t seen any major shift, and again, if at all, we are seeing more displacement. And we feel that better be security, even in an environment where people focus on cost will still prevail in a lot of the cases.

Got it. Got it. That’s really helpful. I was going to direct this next question to Nick. I am not sure if he’s on the call, but my congrats to him on his next phase. So, Tomer, maybe I will make the follow-up for you as well. A lot of good stuff to talk about there with the MSSP channel. Could you just -- can you just talk about to what extent are they selling some of your newer emerging products and what kind of revenue opportunity could that be?

Of course and we wish Nick all the best. He’s not on the call. MSSP for us, again, it’s a highly strategic go-to-market motion. We haven’t even started to unlock the other revenue line possibilities we have with the MSSP ecosystem. For the first time, we have actually enabled them to sell new modules that happened last quarter for the first time. So it’s just the first innings of that opportunity. Right now, we are still laser focused on addressing core security needs like EDR and EPP. We are now extending it to Ranger and MDR as well as a resell. So, all in all, we feel that’s going to be a sustained and resilient part of our business, especially as you see SMBs trying to avoid not the technology and software costs, but really the overhead in recruiting more and more headcount into their security teams and are looking to offset that by procuring direct services, scale services from the MSSP ecosystem. Obviously, that bodes well for us. We have a complete multi-tenanted solution for that MSSP ecosystem that actually allows them to be more productive in what they do. So, again, even in this environment, MSSP is definitely a shining point for us.

Very helpful, guys. Thanks very much.

Our next question comes from Alex Henderson with Needham. Your line is now open.

Great. Thank you so much. You gave a guide -- preliminary guide, I guess, is the right way to say it for FY 2024, 50% ARR growth. The question I have for you is really without giving a forecast, can you give us some sense of the way you are thinking about the OpEx spend in that environment, will you still produce at a 50% type growth rate, the same or a similar degree of leverage or do you think the leverage becomes a little bit more muted as a result of the slower growth before the reacceleration?

We think that the ARR, let’s call it, tentative guidance for next year is really a floor. When I think about it, we believe it’s conservative. We are looking at it as something we can build from. In terms of our OpEx spend, we have always said and you have definitely seen this over the past couple of quarters where we beat by 17% and 14% in terms of operating margins. A lot of our spend is highly elective and we will invest when it makes sense and we will pull back when it doesn’t. We are always going to map towards our long-term projections in terms of profitability. So if you look, we have made great strides in the years past. We basically cut down our losses by about half every year and I would anticipate that to continue into next year. Our long-term goals and our path to that is unchanged, no matter what the growth is.

The second question I’d like to ask is, can you talk a little bit about the linearity of demand over the course of the quarter? It seems like business is really decelerating very sharply from September to October and then October into November, broadly. Is that consistent with what you are seeing or is the resigning giving you some variance from that? Thanks.

What we are seeing is that a lot of the linearity -- generally, linearity is something that is also under our control. So when we look at our deal inspections, when we dive deep into what we see in the pipeline, we reckon that at the end of the day, a lot of the ability to progress linearity lies within our hand. It’s something that we can, to an extent, mitigate by just performing better and it’s something that as we kind of enter Q4, we see it as something that is much healthier than what we have seen in previous quarters. Some of it is also our changes. What we are doing to actually make sure we can achieve linearity even under decelerating macro conditions. So to us right now, we feel pretty confident in the guide that we gave for Q4. To us it embodies every factor that we have seen in the past couple of quarters, and once again, we feel, given our seasonality, given our linearity is something that we can stand behind.

Great. Thanks so much for taking the question.

Our next question comes from Hamza Fodderwala with Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open.

Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. A couple of questions. Tomer, I think, you alluded to some deals that slipped out of Q3, but closed in fiscal Q4 and these were some pretty large deals. Can you help us quantify how much those deals contributed or would have contributed to Q3? And then secondly, for Dave, you mentioned, operating profitability in fiscal 2024. I just want to be clear, is that for the full year of fiscal 2024 and would you expect free cash flow breakeven to proceed that by about four quarters? Thank you very much.

When we look at the deals that slipped, several millions closed in the days that follow. To us we kind of saw two different dynamics. One are these deals that slip. They contribute somewhat to the next quarter. But I think what is safe to assume is that now we are seeing this as more of a part of our business and not just slip deals. The second one we are seeing and oddly enough, we have actually added more and more large deals this quarter than ever before, more large logos than ever before. But at the same time, deal sizes have changed in nature given to the pressures on budget. So, all in all, we kind of feel like we are recalibrating around the new realities in our market. But once, again, we feel highly confident that we can continue to operate in this environment.

And Hamza, to answer your second question, we have talked about timing of free cash flow, in creating free positive cash flow. We are still expecting that to happen at the end of next fiscal year and then what we are hoping for and really working to achieve is how to get breakeven in fiscal year 2025. So the following year. So we do expect free cash flow to hit before profitability and then those two will be much more mapped together.

Thank you.

Okay.

Our next question comes from Jonathan Ho with William Blair. Your line is now open.

Hi. Good afternoon. Just wanted to start out with, maybe a little bit of additional color on how you think about driving more productivity out of your existing sales teams, while also driving this additional cost savings. I just want to understand how do you think about sort of balancing that effort and your confidence level around being able to achieve both?

Hey. I think we have mentioned that, we have just recruited a ton of great talent in the past year and a lot of these folks, especially on the sales side, are actually ramping and still ramping. We are now working to enable them faster. We are working to get them productive sooner. And naturally, as they progress down the line, as you can imagine, people that have been in the company less than a year are not as productive as people that are in the company for year and a half or two. So naturally, we expect more productivity. With that, we have also combined the solution engineering and sales engineering to create a more, sorry, and the sales organization to create a more curated experience for customers. We put a new leader in North America and we are putting more and more emphasis on how we sell to the highest enterprises to the largest global that we have in our pipeline. All of those have already started to show great signs of success and we will continue doing that. As more and more of our business is moving upstream, that to us remains, again, a strategic go-to-market element and avenue that we feel is just getting stronger and stronger for us. Again, there are many other initiatives that we are taking. But, all in all, the ramp, enablement and eventually the changes we have made in our go-to-market organization are already yielding results for us and we are going to continue and drive that into the future.

Got it. Got it. And then just in terms of a follow-up, can you talk a little bit more about the deal resizing that you are seeing out there, like, are these deals typically more being phased in, are they being reduced in size and scope or are you actually seeing anything in terms of renewals, durations changing at all as well? Thank you.

The most prevalent dynamic we are seeing out there is really just right-sizing by customers. I mean, they just want to procure for now versus any aspirational note counts that they might have planned for the future and that to me is the prevailing dynamic. I mean, we are not seeing multiphase deployments. People buy for what they need and they come back for expansion. That to me, once again, is the main thing we are seeing out there. We are also seeing it is really more of a future upsell opportunity. I mean these customers are now choosing the core components of our platform and later on as they progress with time, we have the ability to go back and upsell them on adjacent models, on more seat counts and really stay true to what customers need in this environment versus just trying to sell them more and more. That’s our entire philosophy.

Great. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Fatima Boolani with Citi. Your line is now open.

Good afternoon. Thank you so much for taking my questions. Tomer, start with you just with respect to some of the items that you itemized around the go-to-market and sales operations changes. So the first one is, I am just curious about a potential succession plan post Nick’s transition and how we should think about his transition in terms of overseeing the broader operations of the sales organization impacting the way you thought about the 4Q execution and the topline guidance? And then, Dave, for you, kind of building off the last question, you talked about cash conservation and cash management sensitivity in your customers. So when I look at your deferred revenue performance, it was a little bit lighter than we were looking for. So if you can maybe shed light on what you are seeing from a contractual and invoicing behavior standpoint as it relates to that cash management sensitivity, I really appreciate it? Thank you.

Yes. So on Nick’s succession, you might recall about 6 months ago, we have added Vats Srivatsan as our COO, and by now largely we moved a lot of these functions that were under Nick under Vats as well. The second part is that, obviously, I am taking a more active role in the go-to-market organization, and as a whole, we have put more emphasis on executive sponsorship throughout the entire process. So we are putting go-to-market front and center is the topmost priority for the company right now and for myself. So we kind of worked to that succession both in terms of continuing the transition that we started about 6 months ago. But at the same time, we also remain opportunistic and if we feel like we can inject another highly tenured sales executive, we might hope to do so in the future.

And Fatima, to answer your second question in regards to free cash flow, what -- I think you are seeing two dynamics. You are seeing, one, where customers just aren’t prepaying for multiyears, which was more prevalent in the past and then you are also seeing the shift to MSSP, where they tend to be paying quarterly versus larger upfront deals. That dynamic we expect to continue for a while.

Our next question comes from Brad Zelnick with Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open.

Great. Thank you so much and it’s good to see the strong execution in this kind of environment. I have got one maybe for Tomer and a quick follow-up for you, David. Tomer, I was intrigued by the customer win you mentioned that chose Singularity Cloud despite running a competitor on their endpoints. Can you maybe mention who the competitor is, what was the circumstance and is this something that we can expect might be more common in the future?

Absolutely. We have seen that dynamic now play for a few good quarters. It’s a strategic go-to-market revenue yet another one for us where we go in and unlock accounts that otherwise have been running some models on the endpoint side. And as you can imagine, we have got two main competitors, you can pick each one of them that you wish for the purpose of illustration. But at the end of the day, it allows us to come in with a truly unique offering right now for cloud workload protection that is far superior to what any other endpoint vendor can provide on the cloud side and on those merits we come in, we secure the cloud environment. It’s not the first one. We have had quite a few of those in the past couple of quarters and it remains, again, competitive advantage that we have, not only in our own existing accounts, not only is now a wider platform, wide offering that spends endpoint and cloud and serves as another differentiator. But once again, in the standalone situations, you are sometimes looking at footprints that are in the cloud are actually bigger than the footprints on the endpoint side. So for us, more cloud deals and the more cloud deals that we can do, it’s incredibly serving to our go-to-market motion. Cloud was again our number one fastest-growing module, and we just invest more and more in an offering that right now is a leg above what anybody else can offer in the space.

That’s really helpful. And David, just a follow-up for you. I appreciate the color you gave for Q4 and ARR for at least 20% sequential growth. Others in the broader market are calling for no seasonal budget flush, no Christmas this year, even sequential declines in Q4. And I know you have a number of benefits, including the deals that pushed from Q3, strong net retention trends, ramping sales productivity and a really strong value prop, but is there any way to maybe further frame and characterize the confidence that you have that underpins your view into Q4? Thanks very much.

Well, we are assuming that the macro conditions continue and persist into Q4. We -- we are still expecting to grow sequentially. This 20%, it’s due to a few things. One, we have a higher concentration of larger deals historically in Q4. Two, we have a record pipeline. We just need to go out and close deals. We are highly confident in the 20% sequential growth and we are hoping to outperform that. We believe this is historic. This is much better or much more conservative versus our historical guidance. If you look traditionally, we were about 40% sequential growth. We are assuming it’s about half that and I think that’s where we are -- that’s how we are looking at this to reflect more conservative guidance around Q4 and we are hoping to build off that.

Yeah. Just to add to that, I mean, we feel like we have got all the raw materials to get there and right now we are just kind of re-rating on our ARR. So to us it feels like we are taking the right step to make sure that we are guiding towards what we feel is absolutely doable. That’s the right thing to do. And with that, as Dave mentioned, record pipelines entering into the quarter, better linearity than last quarter that I mentioned just a few moments ago, all of those give us increased confidence that we can hit the Q4 number, potentially even do better.

And I think another thing to consider is that we have never been benefits of a budget flush. I think we have just traditionally seen deals that closed. We have never been a company, I think, that have companies just come to us and say, hey, I have got a bunch of budget I need to spend it. When customers work with us, we are trying to do what’s best for the customer and we are trying to make sure that we provide a solution for them. So the idea of a budget flush just isn’t something that we are expecting will affect us.

Yeah. I concur by the way. We have never seen that phenomenon for better or for worse.

Okay. Makes total sense. Thank you so much, guys.

Our next question comes from Gray Powell with BTIG. Your line is now open.

Hi, Gray. Are you on the line. You might be unmute.

There we go. Looks like analyst stay on, not hard to hit the mute button. So thanks for taking the question. So a lot of good detail in here so far. So when we think through your outlook for 50% ARR growth next year, how do you think linearity plays out relative to this year and prior years, should we expect that the net adds next year to be more back end loaded?

I think, generally, I mean, it will be typical to our business. I mean I wouldn’t expect any major departure from how we have been operating in the past couple of years. It might be a bit more smoothened out, but again, at large, I would say, it remains relatively the same.

Okay. Great. And then just my other question would be, I know you are not breaking out Attivo anymore, but just how has growth there been relative to your original expectations? And as you get that product more into your sales motion, do you see an opportunity to accelerate growth in the product from that original 50% growth rate that we were talking about at the beginning of the year?

As we look into next year, we believe that’s going to be one of our stronger propositions. I mean to us, being still in the early days of our integration, we believe we haven’t fully unlocked the potential in that acquisition and in identity security in general. We have generated record pipeline for identity security this past quarter. So we feel better about the overall prospectus of what this could look like in the years to come. With that, obviously, macro impacts everything and identity is no different. We always expect highly and we may be expected more. But, generally speaking, as we go into next year with a fully-integrated offering. We feel that’s the best way to unlock the identity perspective, both in terms of the go-to-market and our sellers being able to sell identity as a holistic part of the platform and also technologically speaking, the product will be completely integrated into our endpoint technology. So it wouldn’t require any additional configuration and that would again unlock and remove more friction.

Understood. Okay. Thank you very much.

Our next question comes from Joseph Gallo with Jefferies. Your line is now open.

Hey, guys. Really appreciate the question. How should we think about macro impact at the lower end of the market? I know you said the large deals is where it was more pronounced. Is the lower end of the market seeing strength or is that partially being masked by the MSSP channel?

It could be. It’s a bit hard to tell. I mean, just given that dynamic that MSSP to an extent masks some of these things from us. But as we look at our own direct contribution in MSSP, it remained relatively in line with past trends. So we haven’t seen anything too dramatic going in SMB, but what we have definitely seen is MSSP on the rise, MSSP taking more customers from the direct business. So even if you look at kind of our customer count as an example, a lot of these customers that we have added in the quarter are actually masked by one master MSSP service provider that basically onboard-s all of these customers. So, all in all, we feel that between MSSP and our direct strength in SMB, we have seen largely consistent execution, and we feel that should continue into the future as well.

Awesome. I appreciate those comments. And then a lot of the congos we have had with cyber professionals, has just been around -- the next real frontier is IoT, which remains a lot West. Can you just give an update on Ranger and is that viewed as a must-have or a nice-to-have in an intensifying macro environment? Thanks guys.

Sure. If you ask me, it’s a must-have, I don’t know that’s the same in the eyes of customers just yet. I think there’s still a lot to still work on in terms of security fundamentals in EDR and EPP are still not prevalent enough. In the frontier, the real frontier is still with EDR and EPP. With that, we are seeing good traction with Ranger. We have been seeing traditionally good traction with Ranger. I think market education always lags the tiny bit the threat landscape, but we believe that as you kind of go into more and more of this need to actually map out your entire asset environment, all your devices and get a grasp on your entire network, Ranger is one of the imperatives that can help customers fast to map out their environment and then provide for better protection and better hygiene. So it remains, again, a leading module for us and one that I hope we will see even more contribution in the next couple of years.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Roger Boyd with UBS Securities. Your line is now open.

Great. Thank you so much for taking the question. Tomer, lots going on with macro, but I have an update on what you are seeing in terms of customer interest around the broader XDR strategy and the data set product. And as we look to calendar 2023, where do you think those kind of security analytics projects stack up in terms of CSO priorities? Thanks.

Absolutely. It’s actually one of the top most priority for a lot of enterprises out there just on the account that these XDR projects when they deal with two data ingestion, like the proposition that we have with Singularity XDR are actually means to offset cost away from legacy data processing solutions. So we have a lot of conversations out there to leverage the already preexisting platform that they own in Singularity XDR and into a full log ingestion mechanism that offsets costs away from traditional SIM providers. So especially in this macro environment for true XDR data down solution and especially if it’s one that already exists in your environment, if you are a user for Singularity XDR or for our EDR or for EPP, you can start ingesting data into it and save cost. We are now building more and more into a realistic business value proposition that ranges from endpoint protection and consolidating away the endpoint security controls that you have now and all the way to cost saving on the log analytics side for security analytics. So expect more of that to happen. Still very, very early in that cycle, still applicable to just a narrow band of use cases. But as we go and execute towards next year, we are adding more and more use cases for customers to be able to enjoy the cost benefit, but now also make sure that there’s a business outcome that’s associated with it across security and all the way to finance and business operations.

Great color. Thanks again.

Our next question comes from Andrew Nowinski with Wells Fargo. Your line is now open.

Okay. Thanks. So I have a question on the FY 2024 guidance. So you talked about gaining market share, seeing more Microsoft displacements, your pipeline is at an all-time high, your preliminary outlook for ARR suggests that net new ARR is only going to grow by 8%. Can you just talk about the factors that you think are going to get worse next year than they were this year to where that net new only grows 8%?

Yeah. I mean, a, we are really, really looking to put some form of a conservative prediction at a time where we don’t believe we can predict anything really. We don’t have a crystal ball. We don’t have a way to know how the economy would look like. Our assumption is that things are not going to get better anytime soon, and just on the account of that, we want to make sure that we don’t put two aspirational target out there for our growth. And as Dave mentioned, to us, we have always been incredibly nimble, incredibly agile in how we spend and how we expect growth, and we will continue keeping an eye as to when we can maybe press more on the gas pedal and maybe accelerate growth versus taking a more prudent and conservative approach to our growth. So, all in all, this just to us means that we want to make sure that we are being responsible custodians and are giving the conservative view of the most that we can see, and right now, to be perfectly honest, there’s not much that we can predict to next year, so we are taking that view.

Okay. Fair enough. And then on the fed side, you said you secured three new agencies. I am just wondering, are those agencies exclusively using SentinelOne for endpoint protection or might they be using other vendors as well? I am just trying to understand the magnitude of those three deals in the fed you mentioned? Thanks.

Of course. Each one of them is slightly different. Some of them do use another vendor out there. Some of them use us exclusively. For all of those, I mean, this is an initial land. I mean, obviously, these agencies are sometimes just incredibly sizable, and for us, I mean, even the initial land is a massive deal, but all of them are just initial lands that will grow over time. For some, there’s another vendor out there, but to us, it’s just a massive, massive win and we continue to see traction in the federal, which is the most important part.

That’s great. Thanks, Tomer.

Our last question comes from Rudy Kessinger with D.A. Davidson. Your line is now open.

Yeah. Thanks for squeezing me in. Really just one for me. You talked about customers kind of right-sizing deal size and taking the number of endpoints they really need today as opposed to kind of buying more endpoint coverage based on some prediction of what they will need in the future. But I guess I am curious, are you also seeing customers may be taking Singularity core or control as opposed to complete and then as you look at the emerging products, it certainly it sounds like cloud security remains very high, but if you just had to look at cloud, identity, Ranger IoT, data protection, just kind of rank order which products are still seeing the most demand versus which have seen maybe a bigger impact to the macro and are getting pushed to the side?

Singularity Control is still the number one package we have and we haven’t seen people shift away to Singularity Core or, I am sorry, Singularity Complete is the number one package that we have. We haven’t really seen anybody move into Singularity Core or Control. To us, it really is about the adjacent modules on top of Singularity Complete that sometimes folks would choose to not spend on right now. These could be adjacent capabilities like remote script execution, endpoint firewall controls that are not always the bare necessities. But when you look at the core needs, obviously, EPP and EDR remain front and center. And the second part there is that, obviously, anybody that has transitioned or started transitioning to the cloud and is now using the cloud as a production environment must deploy workload protection, run and protection into those. So those become a must-have. So across these two functions as well as more demand for MDR services and managed services. Those are kind of the, call it, the bread and butter of what we sell on today. Data retention is one that I highlight as well. Again, that’s actually a cost saver to many folks out there where they can retain data with the Singularity platform versus maybe putting it in another costly data lake. So those to us have seen the most success and continue to grow. I think for some of the other offerings that we have had, especially if you kind of look into endpoint management, that’s where sometimes people choose to pause and really focus on the ones that matters most.

Got it. Great. Thanks for taking the question.

And our final question is from Tal Liani with Bank of America. Your line is now open.

Hi, guys. I have two questions. Thanks very much, by the way, for squeezing me in. The first one is, if I look at prior down cycles, there was always an issue for smaller companies to maintain the pace, because some customers are looking at balance sheet strength and are looking at cash flow, cash burn, losses and are shifting business to companies who are more financially stable. Your case is a little bit different because you are a leader in your space and I am wondering if you had this kind of discussion with your customers or if you had this kind of consent, how you address them if it’s a consideration at all? That’s my first question. My second question is about large customers. We are seeing across the Board that companies are talking about slowdown from smaller customers or push outs and push out is always the first step before slowdown. And the question is, are you concerned that what you are seeing today is only the short-term, meaning smaller companies just react really quickly to what’s happening in the market and slowing spending and we could see larger customers doing the same thing at the beginning of the year. So that means we haven’t hit the bottom yet in terms of spending. So the question is as much as you can say, it’s not qualitative -- it’s not quantitative question, it’s more qualitative, as much as you could see. How do you -- what’s your view of larger companies, those who are working on annual budgets. What kind of discussions you have with them when it comes to how will next year look like? Thanks.

First, on the first question, honestly, we haven’t seen that and our cash balance is incredibly strong by I think any degree. So we haven’t heard that from customers at all. I think customers still look at us as a very cost effective solution and one that on the TCO perspective helps them more than almost any other vendor out there and that comes again on the back of a public company with transparent financials and that has been, I think, just a stellar for in cybersecurity. To the second question, I think, we are seeing large enterprises react and they react by really right-sizing. I think if you couple the pipeline, you really understand that the customer intent is still there. Cybersecurity is not something they can push or punt. They actually want to buy it, but they want to optimize on costs at the same time. So if you couple the pipeline strength and you couple the trends in deal right-sizing, I think, that’s the right dynamic that you are going to see and it’s something that we have seen, I think, even starting a little bit last quarter, it did show up this quarter even in a more pronounced way and now we are kind of factoring it in. So, all in all, I don’t feel like you are going to see large enterprises saying, I don’t want to spend their security. They have to spend on the security, whether it’s with the incumbent that they currently have or with a new vendor that can supply better security, probably, right around the same cost structure, they are going to have to spend it. So I don’t foresee any further tapering or any further slowdown in how they are thinking about purchasing. I think we will see a continued trend to right-size deals. And I think that SentinelOne is very well positioned to deal with that. We have always been the more cost-optimized solution in the market. It bodes incredibly well with our business model. That’s why you see us, even in this macro environment improving on gross margin. That couldn’t have happened if we haven’t had really robust and healthy pricing to couple with that.

Great. Thank you.

There are no more questions. I will pass the call back over to the management team for closing remarks.

Thank you, everybody. Really appreciate your time today.

That concludes the conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.